What if every citizen says "This unlawful, come in here and I'll shoot you!"
That's a VERY good reason to announce your presence. The police are too stupid to understand that, and blame their obvious error on the homeowner who was just trying to defend himself. This is not how a free society is run.
I agree. If you read the memo, installation of the "malware" requires authorization from the user. If you choose to do that, the OS vendors hands are clean. Apple isn't responsible for removing software you installed.
The Indiana Supreme Court wrote "We believe however that a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence."
It is abundantly clear that modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is incompatible with the Fourth Amendment.
This is absolutely correct. It is easier to find an object in a 1d list than a 2d matrix. With a list, you start at the top and move down. You are guaranteed to find your item. With a matrix, you have to reposition your eyes frequently.
Sorted lists are objectively better for usability. Period.
And for godsakes keep it offline 'cause it's insecure as heck now.
Firewall it. Use Dillo as the browser. With no ports visible to the internet, and a browser that doesn't even support javascript, there's very little surface area for an attacker to find a hole.
The PS2 is a bad example. What about the Xbox? It's a fairly standard X86 box with a custom windows 2000 build. Why hasn't anyone hacked VirtualBox into VirtualXbox yet?
Kids aren't interested unless you're interested. Don't go "hey kids look at this old crap!", that won't work. Play with it while they're around and they will be interested in what you're doing. It's monkey see, monkey do with kids.
Actually, I just pulled out my old PI and PII systems, after most of a decade in the closet. Putting Dos on the one and 98SE on the other, and playing some of the games I missed. It's been a *lot* of fun.
Nearly all men will get prostate cancer if they live long enough. It's slow growing and asymptomatic, so it might not even be the worst health problem grandpa has.
No you can't. A capitalist state with no social spending would have no brakes on the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few. Let that go on unfettered and you're just begging for a revolution. The French kind, not the warm and cuddly American kind.
Capitalists in America complaining about social spending is like bitching about the food you have to feed the goose that lays the golden eggs.
Slashdot Mirror
The police have a right to work safely.
And I have a right to be safe in my home.
What if every citizen says "This unlawful, come in here and I'll shoot you!"
That's a VERY good reason to announce your presence. The police are too stupid to understand that, and blame their obvious error on the homeowner who was just trying to defend himself. This is not how a free society is run.
There is no such thing as a tamper proof device. Any attempt to market such a device is fraudulent.
I still use XBMC4XBOX every night. I will enjoy this immensely. Thanks!
I agree. If you read the memo, installation of the "malware" requires authorization from the user. If you choose to do that, the OS vendors hands are clean. Apple isn't responsible for removing software you installed.
Which is another way of saying we have no protection against unlawful entry at all. This is clearly not what was intended by the 4th amendment.
Everyone knows holes exist. Every non-trivial piece of software has holes in it.
Why would Siemens bother fixing holes nobody knows about?
Throw it in the trash and get a superior CRT. Shouldn't cost more than $10.
The Indiana Supreme Court wrote "We believe however that a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence."
It is abundantly clear that modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is incompatible with the Fourth Amendment.
This is absolutely correct. It is easier to find an object in a 1d list than a 2d matrix. With a list, you start at the top and move down. You are guaranteed to find your item. With a matrix, you have to reposition your eyes frequently.
Sorted lists are objectively better for usability. Period.
If you really want a hard core browsing experience, try UZBL.
this change will simply help facilitate that ignorance.
I think that's actually Google's intention. Make a browser the ignorant can use.
Who's using a resolution of 1280x1024 these days? I run my 10 year old CRT at 1600x1200.
Nice. A completely wrong post, and self-reply correcting it in one line nets you +5 insightful and +5 interesting. Good job.
And for godsakes keep it offline 'cause it's insecure as heck now.
Firewall it. Use Dillo as the browser. With no ports visible to the internet, and a browser that doesn't even support javascript, there's very little surface area for an attacker to find a hole.
The PS2 is a bad example. What about the Xbox? It's a fairly standard X86 box with a custom windows 2000 build. Why hasn't anyone hacked VirtualBox into VirtualXbox yet?
Kids aren't interested unless you're interested. Don't go "hey kids look at this old crap!", that won't work. Play with it while they're around and they will be interested in what you're doing. It's monkey see, monkey do with kids.
Actually, I just pulled out my old PI and PII systems, after most of a decade in the closet. Putting Dos on the one and 98SE on the other, and playing some of the games I missed. It's been a *lot* of fun.
If you were native to the US, you used AIM. If you were native to Europe, you used MSN. If you were native to the internet, you used IRC.
If you have more IPs than computers, then no you absolutely do not need NAT. A simple firewall would be more effective and cause fewer problems.
The only reason NAT is common today is that there are more devices than ip addresses.
Nearly all men will get prostate cancer if they live long enough. It's slow growing and asymptomatic, so it might not even be the worst health problem grandpa has.
No you can't. A capitalist state with no social spending would have no brakes on the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few. Let that go on unfettered and you're just begging for a revolution. The French kind, not the warm and cuddly American kind.
Capitalists in America complaining about social spending is like bitching about the food you have to feed the goose that lays the golden eggs.
Communist? Marx was actually a supply sider.
That's what DNS is for.
I certainly can't claim to have never done anything stupid. But isn't it funny how I never did anything stupid when LILO was the popular boot loader?
Sure, i'll cop to being an idiot. In fact, that's my whole point. LILO was idiot proof, Grub is not.