Slashdot Mirror


TI vs. Calculator Hobbyists, the Next Round

An anonymous reader writes "Texas Instruments has struck back against Nspire gamers and hackers with even stronger anti-downgrade protection in OS 3.0.2, after the TI calculator hacking community broke the anti-downgrade protection found in OS 2.1 last summer and the new one in OS 3.0.1 a month ago. In addition to that, in OS 3.0.1 the hacker community found Lua programming support and created games and software using it. Immediately, TI retaliated by adding an encryption check to make sure those third-party generated programs won't run on OS 3.0.2." But if you want it, you can get OS 3.0.2 here.

301 comments

  1. Why? by burisch_research · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would TI want to do this? Seems they are just shooting themselves in both feet.

    --
    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I believe it's related to them being certified tamperproof.. allowed in exams.. academia, their main customers etc etc

    2. Re:Why? by gtch · · Score: 5, Funny

      *everyone* is trying to copy the iPhone these days

    3. Re:Why? by burisch_research · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK, so then perform an integrity check at boot. If the checksums don't match, display a message for 10 seconds. Invigilators can then confirm that the examinee has a clean device.

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    4. Re:Why? by squall14716 · · Score: 1

      If you hack a calculator to cheat on an exam, you deserve that advantage, IMO.

    5. Re:Why? by Robadob · · Score: 1

      But the weak model of nSpire has 2 modes, one where some light shows to prove that it is in exam mode and then doesn't show when its got memory features etc enabled (iirc). And the more advanced model of nSpire which i have is just outright banned from exams. So stopping programming for the reason of allowed in exams just doesn't seem like a valid answer, I for one doubt my university would let me use the weaker model with some way of saying whether i have it in 'exam mode' or not.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing i can see outright different between the nSpire series and other TI calculators would be their teaching ability. Because asfar as i know there is some form of wireless system where a teacher can use some module to see what is on the screen of each calculator in a classroom, i may be wrong because i could never find a great deal of information. But there was always some form of implied wireless ability in their adverts for 'Use Them To Teach in Class!'.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a professor who had that mentality. I showed him how to program a calculator as a freshman, and he not only said that I deserve that advantage if I can write a program to compute a riemann sum, but if I wrote the source code on the exam he would count it as showing my work and give partial credit if I got the wrong answer.

    8. Re:Why? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a non-programmer, which the test creators and proctors likely are as well, here is my train of thought:

      1) Cool. Good solution.
      2) Wait, that means we have to check every calculator.
      3) There were ~100 students taking the SAT/ACT tests when I took them. About 20-30 students in my low level math courses in college. Decent time sink to have each student turn on the calculator, wait for the checksum, verify it, move to the next student. Waiting for students to turn off their calculators because there will always be some who jump the gun.

      I had a TI, I loved the customization some could pull off. I just can't blame TI for wanting to perfect their device for their marketing niche. Still, couldn't TI just make a "Academia Certified" version with extra protection and their normal model for those who don't need it?

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    9. Re:Why? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      i majored at university in mathematics and *never* used a calculator during exams. Something suggests examiners are doing it wrong.

    10. Re:Why? by somersault · · Score: 2

      I read before of a guy making a program that fakes the boot sequence to get around that kind of check..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Why? by sohmc · · Score: 1

      When I took the SATs, you we were given a calculator. A few tests I took, you could only have non-graphing calculators.

      I suppose they could do the same thing here and avoid the whole issue.

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    12. Re:Why? by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 2

      If you hack a calculator to cheat on an exam, you deserve that advantage, IMO.

      The person who implemented the hack, sure, but what of the thousands afterwards who do nothing more than install it?

    13. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it's related to them being certified tamperproof.. allowed in exams.. academia, their main customers etc etc

      It's a good theory, except that the HP graphing calculators are allowed in all standardized exams while still being hacker-friendly.

      The TI managers are just being PHBs. They're non-technical people who think not being in complete control of hardware that they view as "theirs" even after the sale is a bad thing. After all, somebody might add new features, and then how are they going to convince people to buy the newer model if they can just add an extra program to their old model for free to get the same functionality?

    14. Re:Why? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to check EVERY Calculator already to look for firmware revision. So how is this a problem? It's not like the older version added wrong, so running a older firmware will give me advantages that lazy test administrators will not bother to look at.

      OH how about simply supplying the calculators for the test? Sounds like a better solution that all these highly educated nimrods cant seem to think of on their own.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were ~140 students taking the matriculation exam math section when I took it. We left the calculator we wanted to use in the exam at the school the previous day and the supervisors cleared their memories before the exam.

    16. Re:Why? by Linker3000 · · Score: 2

      Just think about it for a moment; if someone managed to deliberately or accidentally bypass the maths integrity checks they could actually divide by zero and the whole universe would collapse in on itself - this would really ruin everyone's day.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    17. Re:Why? by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In high-school I wrote an arbitrary problem approximating algorithm for the TI-82 in its horribly broken calculator basic. Also, we wrote applications to play solitare, reversi, tetris, and a really crappy overhead shooter without resorting to assembly.

      If you have ANY ability to program your calculator exposed, you have zero test integrity. Anything less than that is delusional. Whether that's Ti-Calculator Basic or a more modern programming language doesn't really matter.

      As another example, the TI-92 I had in College was banned from the SAT's for having a QWERTY keyboard, yet the TI-89's shared the same internals without a keyboard and were OK. The difference? You had to press the "Function" key to type with a QWERTY equivalent. It's security theater.

    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, these calculator hobbyists are not TI's target demographic. Academia is.

      However, this battle is fascinating from a programmer's standpoint. It demonstrates how hard it is to lock down a device effectively.

    19. Re:Why? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      OH how about simply supplying the calculators for the test? Sounds like a better solution that all these highly educated nimrods cant seem to think of on their own.

      This will only work if the school buys calculators for everyone at the start of the year that will be identical in operation to the ones handed out during exams. Else students risk having to spend the first part of an exam learning how to operate a new calculator.
      Say $120 per calculator, plus $20 per year for service / replacements. Multiply by number of students at the high school.
      Then add the exam calculators, which have to be either bought new or re-flashed and inspected before the exam (what if a last year's exam evil genius hacked his exam calculator and added an overloaded function giving wrong results for a certain type of operations? Too bad for next year's student)

      Seems like you have hit on a viable but very expensive solution. Good luck getting the vote for that over, say, books or replacing broken chairs.

    20. Re:Why? by jmauro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because their main customers are academic test producers who mandate TI calculators for use with the scan tron tests because they're less "hackable". This causes every student in high school to be forced to go out and buy one for use on the exams.

      The enthusiast crowd isn't even a rounding error in that market, so it makes sense for TI not to care about them.

    21. Re:Why? by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And why should anyone trust that message? Can you be sure it was generated by the trusted firmware?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    22. Re:Why? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      How long does certification take? Because that may explain this: http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/1996.png

      I love my TI-89. I couldn't imagine doing too much without it. Yes I can do it all by hand, but it's much faster with the 89. Dec to Binary or Hex. Unit conversion (And you can give it weird inputs like how long to move x ft using m/s^2, etc). rref with large arrays to solve linear problems. (And I don't always have Matlab with me).
      But some stuff takes forever to do. We have portable devices that are cracking 1gHz now and the TI-89 is 16 MHz. I'm sure there are chips out there that run faster with less power, especially since the TI-89 came out in 2004. The Nspire series is more on par with a 83/84 replacement than an 89.

    23. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have ANY ability to program your calculator exposed, you have zero test integrity.

      Not really. It's all about memorization, anyway. And your education.

    24. Re:Why? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Remove and reinsert the battery. After that I'm sure you'll get a real boot.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    25. Re:Why? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Have you seen tuition fees lately? $120 is a drop in the ocean compared to all the plasma TVs and sports stadiums.

      --
      No sig today...
    26. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different SATs, kid. These aren't the Stanfords.

    27. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it works then one have to ask what the point of the exam is. If the exam is representative for the course then whatever the school teaches has already been automated by one of the students and is outdated. If not then the exam is pointless.

      TI's blocking is a way to cover up a symptom of a symptom of a symptom of a potential problem. If you are going to cover shit up, at least do it at the source.

    28. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    29. Re:Why? by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They have to dumb it down these days. They don't teach kids how to graph by hand and identify the key points (zeroes, inflections, maximum/minimum) by the function itself anymore

    30. Re:Why? by bytesex · · Score: 1

      They cost 10 Euros where I live.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    31. Re:Why? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

      So, now you'll have test administrators spending up to, say, 15 seconds with each student verifying that their calculators are not hacked. Let's see... in a room with 300 students, you spend 15 seconds with each...

      Why 15 seconds? Time for the student to pull out the calculator, hand it to the administrator who would turn it on (because you would be able to program a passable "firmware OK" screen and conveniently run it before handing it over), review it, and hand it back to the student, who might then make some snarky remark regarding a "waste of time".

      --
      I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    32. Re:Why? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a tamper proof device. Any attempt to market such a device is fraudulent.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    33. Re:Why? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      What will stop a hacked calculator from displaying this message as well?

    34. Re:Why? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      What about those using it for mathematics, physics, and many other subjects that have nothing to do with programming? Does being good at programming give you a free pass to cheat those as well?

    35. Re:Why? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      In my high schools a solution you couldn't argue for was considered failed because it could have been calculated by a calculator.

    36. Re:Why? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Not only that but enthusiast crowd actually works on actively harming the goals of main target audience (schools, doing only what it is designed to do and nothing else). As a result TI has no choice but to stop hacking by any means necessary.

    37. Re:Why? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If they want them to be tamper-proof, I think they had better change the design a bit. Get rid of that pesky data port for loading on programs. And encase the circuitry in black epoxy. If you are just going to wipe the calculator before the exam, you don't need a data port to program it. Maybe if the school is really that worried about it, they could have their own set of certified calculators that they hand out at the beginning of exams. Always make sure to have a few extra in case they break (not that I've ever seen a calculator break, but you don't want students using that as an excuse). They would probably last quite a few years, given that they'd only be used for exams. This is probably the only way to prevent people from having hacked calculators. I mean, if someone was really determined, they could replace the entire innards with their own custom hardware, and probably fool just about anybody who came around to clear the calculator contents.

      There's really only 3 solutions here.

      Solution 1, No calculators period.

      Solution 2 No calculators above TI-30 allowed, this is what most classes in my university did. actually they specified about 3 models of TI-30s that were allowed. Most people got the one with the 2 line display, but that's about as complicated as they got.

      Solution 3. Allow TI-86 or whatever the student wants to bring, and assume that the exam is basically open book at that point. Design your exam accordingly.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    38. Re:Why? by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Math students don't deal with numbers. Often though, science students and other disciplines do.

    39. Re:Why? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      For mathematics this is probably completely possible. The more mathy courses I took Algebra & Geometry, discrete math, and others didn't require a calculator. It more stuff like science, physics, and engineering classes that tend to lean more on the calculator usage. Granted in many of those cases you don't need anything more complex than a basic scientific calculator, but in many cases it really helps. Plus, it prepares you for the real world, where you'll be using a calculator for most of your work. I say, just let them use the calculator, and write the exam as though it's open book.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    40. Re:Why? by sternmath · · Score: 2

      Remove and reinsert the battery. After that I'm sure you'll get a real boot.

      the Nspire CX and CX CAS have hard-installed Li ion batteries -- not easily removed

    41. Re:Why? by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      Unless you have better exams to suggest, I wouldn't try to discard those in place so quickly. Between these and nothing at all, I'd rather keep the former.

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    42. Re:Why? by profplump · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why are we teaching children to do jobs that can be done by computers? Computers are terrible and math and really good at calculation -- why don't we divide the effort (and hence the instruction) along those lines.

      I'm not saying we shouldn't teach children to do arithmetic, but there's a limited amount of math instruction time available, and I don't think we should waste it being sure Johnny can manually calculate large bits of long division instead of teaching him what division might actually accomplish.

      If you want to be sure Johnny understands the calculation, have him write a program for his calculator that does it. Once he can do that he clearly understands the manipulation required so there's no reason to make him keep doing manually it when there's a $0.03 device that can do the same thing faster and more accurately.

      To me this all seems equivalent to teaching kids to farm using ox-powered plows rather than tractors -- yes, it's important to understand how it works, but it's not important to be able to actually do it efficiently once you've got that understanding.

    43. Re:Why? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      As another example, the TI-92 I had in College was banned from the SAT's for having a QWERTY keyboard

      Perhaps there's a reasoning behind that: programming a calculator without QWERTY is a rather hellish experience if you need to do it quickly, as in a test. So if the memory is cleared before the test, the TI-89 is fine while the 92 wouldn't be.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    44. Re:Why? by definate · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      While there are 10-20 students in my maths classes at university, there are about 500 of us in the program, and all 500 of us sit the exams at the same time, in the same building, with approximately 2,500 others at exactly the same time, in exactly the same location.

      Each proctor is in charge of monitoring about 100 students, which isn't hard since they keep their heads down, and there's a space of just under a meter in between each person to the next closest person.

      So, while you think your time is bad, imagine the time it would take at my uni!

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    45. Re:Why? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      ... so how long until students catch on to what model of calculator will be used for the test. That's an easy swap as the instructor finishes passing out exams/calculators. The real fix, IMHO, is to design the problems so that no calculator is needed. Or have the student reduce calcs to their simplest form without running the numbers.

    46. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need a calculator, then it's not a math exam, it's an arithmetic exam. I recall a lot of arithmetic questions on math exams even into my last year of my physics undergrad. The solution is simple. Stop re-testing arithmetic all the time! Quit being lazy and write a proper test. I agree that it's important to be able to do arithmetic, but the amount of time many students waste doing it manually is foolish. This is a worthless skill in the real world, computers are just so much better.

    47. Re:Why? by Lionel+Debroux · · Score: 1

      Actually, one of the older versions, OS 3.0.1, released at the beginning of April 2011, _did_ have a number of wrinkles in the math functionality that were not present in 1.x-2.x OS versions :)

    48. Re:Why? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      You are assuming here that TI actually cares about hobbyists; clearly they do not and they would rather just make it harder to hack the device than to shift the burden onto exam proctors.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    49. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are also a lot of corporate, research, and government type programs that demand highly audited and certified secure equipment.
      For example, if TI is selling calcs to engineers working in nuclear industries or secret government projects, they want to be able to prove that nobody slipped literal Spyware onto a unit. Or some type of Worm that wrecks your nuclear production facility...

      TI isn't interested in the enthusiast crowd because they know those people are running powerful math applications on much better hardware which can already vastly outperform anything those old chipsets can dream of. That leaves just a few people who simply like to hack anything for the fun of it, and school students who are curious or trying to cheat.

    50. Re:Why? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 0

      While I would agree with that if you wrote it, it also seems obvious that you could download answers and programs to deal with this sort of thing.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    51. Re:Why? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Love doesn't sell calculators. Mandatory restrictions imposed by colleges sell calculators (at huge markups).

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    52. Re:Why? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      The mathematics required for any undergrad and probably many phd level degrees has not changed in what..100? 200 years? Depending on your age, what worked for you parents (or grandparents) and theirs before is just as valid today as it was then. Personally, I would remove calculators from every exam as they encourage plug and chug instead of thought.

    53. Re:Why? by timbos · · Score: 2

      Why do students need graphing calculators to sit exams? My University specified a standard model for exams (I studied Physics), which they supplied during exams. You could buy one the same (cost was approximately $20, since it didn't do graphing or anything clever) if you wanted, but since all one needs is trig functions, perhaps some stats, and basic arithmetic. Everything else should likely be understood/remembered by the student since that's what exams are there to test.

    54. Re:Why? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that: In every college exam where I've been allowed a calculator so far, no one cared about the model of calculator. Their attitude is, time spent playing with the calculator, attempting to cheat or to exploit some advanced feature for an edge, is time wasted by not actually doing the math or physics you need to do. The exams where they would care, they just disallowed all calculators to make things easier.

      Now, I barely hacked my calculator to help with the exam -- I just put a few physical constants in more-accessible locations, might have written a few macros for formulas which were easy to remember but tedious -- but I did deliberately buy an HP so I could hack it if I wanted to.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    55. Re:Why? by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Actually, they do. And it's pretty obvious that a student used the calculator when you get answers like 0.707...

    56. Re:Why? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      ...which is why I was so surprised that not a single professor I've had so far who allows calculators has asked for a specific version, or even a specific company. HP is much kinder to enthusiasts, but no one even blinks when I bring a high-end HP model.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    57. Re:Why? by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Ti has a long history of screwing with homebrew apps, especially ASM apps.

      They only started supporting ASM on their calcs when they couldn't stop zshell and fargo devs from getting the most out of their 85 and 92 calcs, and then the SDK was crippled with a stupid code signing scheme that limited code size, which the community hacked around.

      As for their current offerings, I swear that Ti anymore builds their calcs based on high school teacher input instead of Math professors and scientist input. Teachers want familiarity with older calcs they've been using for years, pretty graphics and ease of use while professors and scientists want raw power and calculation expandability. Teachers don't want programming capabilities because in their mind it turns them into a gameboy (Completely ignoring the fact that programming takes math to make a game work right not to mention gets students interested in computer programming) while professors want programming to solve complex problems without having to enter 20 equations manually each time in an inexpensive handheld package.

      I think this is the same reason the Ti-82 OS keeps living on and on and the Ti-85 OS is dead. Even though the Ti-85 OS was much more superior in many aspects and ran on basically the same hardware as an 82 with a slightly bigger screen, it was too different from the 82 so teachers shunned it. The Ti-92 is the last calc OS they made with Both Teachers and Math Professionals in mind. Thankfully they haven't snuffed it like they did the Ti-85/6 yet but who knows, they'll probably replace it with the Ti-84 super saiyan edition anytime now with bright flashing yellow case, 16 MB of flash and the same limitations and 24K Ram Footprint the Ti-82 has had for almost 20 years now.

    58. Re:Why? by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, they use grade averaging when the exam ends unexpectedly.

    59. Re:Why? by daedae · · Score: 1

      Mod parent +1 too-obvious-and-smart-to-ever-be-put-into-practice(-again).

      I remember in Calc 2 in college one test where I used my graphing calculator as a crutch, since I had some extra time and had no idea how to solve the problem. It had something to do with finding a curve that was less than or greater than another, so I just started punching stuff in until something looked good. (Naturally, the professor didn't give me any credit for it; his comment on the test was "maybe, but why?")

    60. Re:Why? by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that it limits the functionality of the device for such a small use of it's design life. I mean seriously, how many times are you going to take a standardized test?

      On top of this, The Nspire has a test mode called Press to test that can be used to limit functionality. It even has a light on some models that blinks when it is active to tell proctors that the mode is activated. Now with this in mind, In theory they shouldn't need to cripple the calc with lack of programming functions so much because if you're taking a test, you just turn on press to test and the calc cripples itself for the duration of the test.

      Of course with ASM level programming you could fake the test mode and lights so that the calc is live, but looks like it's crippled. But then Ti could just focus on hardening the press to test mode from attack instead of making their entire built up programming community of over 20 years stand up and beeline for the nearest Casio or HP calc they can find.

    61. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowledge is power...

    62. Re:Why? by WorBlux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because it strengthens the part of the brain that does symbol manipulation. Learning to do long division quickly and accurately sets up the brain so it can do more complex algorithm's involving variables quickly and accurately.

    63. Re:Why? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, as someone who taught HS and college level math. So do many teachers. The problem is parents don't agree. Every time math educators try and make the curriculum less computational parents and voters object strongly.

    64. Re:Why? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      OK, then TI could add a hardware "cut power" button (or simply a hardware power on/off switch). OK, in principle people could mess with the hardware as well, but if the button is installed in a way that it's hard to manipulate it without breaking or visibly damaging the calculator, it should be sufficiently tamper-proof.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    65. Re:Why? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      Same here... you didn't explain the result, you didn't get the point.

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    66. Re:Why? by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      It's working for Apple

    67. Re:Why? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      And once youdo, glitching or tapping the bus lines of the hardware usually gets around it.

    68. Re:Why? by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Actaully you'd just overflow the stack.

    69. Re:Why? by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      it's important to understand how it works, but it's not important to be able to actually do it efficiently once you've got that understanding.

      How else do you test whether a student really understands how math works, if not by a proctored test free of computational aids?

      I owned multiple graphing calculators in high school and college, and always had simple programs for some of the most common tasks (e.g. quadratic formula), which were immensely useful for checking my work (and occasionally a useful shortcut around actually doing anything, since the teachers didn't always look very closely). They're terrific tools, and I certainly wouldn't ever want to do quadratic equations in my head again. But what we're testing isn't the ability to do computation quickly, it's the ability to apply mathematical knowledge to solve a problem. If the tests are too computational, the solution is to make them more applied, not to dumb down the schooling even more. Besides, any student smart enough to program formulas into a calculator should have no problem doing them manually in a test setting; I certainly didn't.

    70. Re:Why? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      And why should anyone trust that message? Can you be sure it was generated by the trusted firmware?

      That makes no sense. Why would someone want to display the "this calculator fails the integrity check" message on purpose?

      You display a message if it's been tampered with, and NO message if it's clean. That way there's no "This calculator passed the integrity check! All good!" message to fake.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    71. Re:Why? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      "Hello world! This is legit version! Yah!"

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    72. Re:Why? by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      No one in an undergrad glass will be allowed a CAS for a test.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    73. Re:Why? by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2

      I majored in physics. After freshman level courses we were NEVER asked to calculate a number. Everything was derived symbolically and the answer to a problem was a formula. That's really the hard part after all; plugging in numbers and getting a numerical answer is trivial.

    74. Re:Why? by Spykk · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your Casio...

    75. Re:Why? by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      Well if you actually wrote it I would say yes, you can't write a program to do something, without having a solid understanding of what that something is. Of course that still doesn't justify the 500+ people afterwards that may just download and install the program made by the author, or even possible trades from programmers. (I understand geometry enough to write a geometry program, you know physics enough to write a physics program, lets swap).

    76. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say $120 per calculator, plus $20 per year for service / replacements. Multiply by number of students at the high school.

      $10, if you're willing to provide calculators with plenty of functionality but without advanced programming capability.

      http://www.amazon.com/FX-300MS-Scientific-Calculator-10-Digit-LCD/dp/B004HX80J4

      Calculators like this do everything that is needed for any reasonable exam. The only things it lacks are things that you don't want to provide to students taking a test in the first place.

    77. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you fail to understand why the 92 was banned from the SAT and the 89 allowed. It's not because you could type letters, it was because of the QWERTY layout itself. The college board is concerned about people being able to re-type the entire SAT into their calculator and steal the questions. You can type much faster on a QWERTY keyboard. The assumption is that you wouldn't be able to type fast enough on the ABCD style to copy as much information. With practice I suppose you could get fast but you can really only type with a couple of fingers on those keyboards instead of with all 10 on a QWERTY so you'll probably never be as fast.

    78. Re:Why? by hjf · · Score: 1

      I still own an HP 50g, I don't use it anymore, because I don't need to. I learned to do all the basic math in my head. The guy next to me needed to do even the simplest multiplications in his calculator because he didn't bother memorizing anything.
      The problem with graphing calculators is that you need to LEARN to use the calculator, but before that, you need to LEARN your maths. It doesn't do everything for you. I mostly used it to check simple integrals which I didn't quite remember (we were allowed to have the basic integrals and derivatives tables on paper anyway).
      I always got straight 10's (we grade from 1 to 10 here), and the class was always whining that I passed because of my calc. So one day I did the exam with NO calculator - just pen and paper. Took a while to figure out a long division and a square root, but I passed with a 10 anyway. That shut them up for good.

      Bottom line: if you don't study, you won't pass. the calculator is not going to solve things for you if you don't know how to use it.

    79. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How else do you test whether a student really understands how math works, if not by a proctored test free of computational aids?

      By starting to ask questions on tests about how you do it instead of asking for numbers. Many, not all, math teachers would be shocked by it but it's how we assess conceptual understanding in most other subjects. There is no reason students can't write sentences on math tests. Just ask the student to explain how to do something with words instead of asking them to do it (you might want to ask them that too, but more to verify they can plug in the numbers).

    80. Re:Why? by mr1911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Great plan, except you are one generation away from having no one capable of creating new algorithms for computers. If one cannot do it, one cannot tell the computer how to do it.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    81. Re:Why? by JAZ · · Score: 2

      we all did that in highschool.... the teacher would come around and reset each of our calculators, but we had an app that faked it so we wouldn't loose all the work we had been doing writing video games for the thing.

      --


      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -- Homer Simpson
    82. Re:Why? by ThatFunkyMunki · · Score: 1

      I was allowed a ti89 for almost all of my classes past my Jr year of high school

      --
      If patriotism is racist, is racism patriotic?
    83. Re:Why? by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I also did the same in high school. It was a horrible idea in hind-sight because I didn't actually learn my math, but I passed my math classes in a breeze. I'd simple make programs for whatever formulas we were using and have simple inputs for whatever numbers given and it would spit out the answer. I was always the first one done and nearly always received at least a B (rarely showed any work). If they're going to require you to use calculators they'd just as well hand them out on the day of the test and collect them back at the end to ensure kids aren't just skirting around doing the math themselves.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    84. Re:Why? by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      ...but we had an app that faked it so we wouldn't loose all the work

      Clearly, you failed spelling.

    85. Re:Why? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Why do students need graphing calculators to sit exams?

      They don't, but they need a calculator they are familiar with.
      Quite often, the maths teacher will want them to use a graphing calculator throughout the year.

      Of course, this is 2011, and what I'd like to see is a calculator emulator running on the student's laptop that's 100% compatible with an approved calculator they'll be given for exams.

    86. Re:Why? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      I bet that they had an app for English class as well.

    87. Re:Why? by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with programming calculators and whatnot, but I keep finding these stories baffling. Why can't TI just have a hard reset switch that clears writeable memory and reads the OS from ROM?

      Or, to save invigilators having to pen the switches, sell an "academic" and "normal" version? This is an obvious route for TI as they can better target price-discrimination against their captive market while still having a model that can face up to competition. I'd assume manufacturing to be virtually identical, a one-button change between batches.

    88. Re:Why? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Why do students need graphing calculators to sit exams?

      You're obviously old. I had a similar reaction when my kid was doing his high school Algebra II homework. The problem involved finding a linear regression for a curve. He whipped out the TI, and I told him to do it longhand. I didn't want him to use the calculator as a crutch, I wanted him to practice doing it himself, like he'd have to on the exam. He couldn't do it. I flipped through the book to see how it was teaching them to do it and found this:

      "(1) Enter the points into your graphing calculator. (2) Press the 'Fit Curve' button."

      I gave up trying to help him.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    89. Re:Why? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a question of "does TI care about hobbyists", but a question of protecting their position as the default calculator for education.

      I did my high school math in the mid-90s (when graphing calculators were just starting to show up), and I wasn't allowed to use a calculator in class at all until we started Trig (and one teacher made us use the lookup tables in the back of the book instead!). Once you were deep into exponents, roots, squares, and so on, then we got to use the calculator (and depending on the class, graphing calcs still weren't allowed).

      When I helped my friend's kid with math a few years back, I was appalled to see that the examples in the textbook actually *assume* you have a particular model of TI calculator: the how-to was literally "enter this number; now hit the [picture] key" and so on.

      Having textbooks assume that you're using a TI brand calculator means tons of extra business - I'm not surprised that they'll do anything required to ensure they don't lose that business.

      I also won't be in the least surprised when hackers figure out how to either spoof the software, or just figure out how to put the guts of one model inside an "approved" model casing.

    90. Re:Why? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      While I would agree with that if you wrote it, it also seems obvious that you could download answers and programs to deal with this sort of thing.

      Changing times, I suspect - my teachers generally had the same reaction, but at the time (mid-90s) you didn't have the easy search capabilities that we do today. I would expect a teacher today to ask for a bit more in that regard (and it can be as little as spending five minutes asking a few pointed questions to make sure the kid actually knows the details of the software)

    91. Re:Why? by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      But the whole point is not to try and get people to perform complex algorithms faster. Those are best handled by a computer. People should be dealing more with the logic and reasoning needed to determine said algorithm and then getting a computer to calculate their algorithm.

      For example, there are various methods/algorithms for approximating the area under a curve that a computer can use to rapidly and fairly accurately calculate that area. In My Calculus class last millenium, we spent a few days on these algorithms and then a huge amount of time on symbolic integration and the fundamental theorem of calculus. Much more useful information to know. A true integration also has the added benefit of getting the exact area under a curve and not an approximation.

    92. Re:Why? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      How do you know that "academic" model isn't just the shell of the academic model with the guts of the normal version? They'd have to make it dissimilar enough to make it very work intensive to swap parts which would be more than a one button change between batches. (Or they just do as they have been doing and say "Bugger off hobbyists, we don't want your business nor will we cater to you, at all."

    93. Re:Why? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      Laptop input is nowhere near as fast or convenient as purpose built input pad like there are on graphic calculators.

    94. Re:Why? by WorBlux · · Score: 2

      Symbolic integration requires a certain amount of 1. constancy and 2. ability to apply rules for symbol manipulation. Long division requires a certain amount of 1. constancy, and 2. ability to apply rules for symbolic manipulation. Symbols being just numbers rather than just numbers and variables, but a very similar process. You would not have been allowed in that class if you hadn't mastered long division. You practice Long division until you can do it quickly and accurately so you have the mental foundation and focus to move up. You don't teach long division because you need a student to do particularly well with Long division any more than Mr. Miyagi really needed his car waxed.

    95. Re:Why? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      What does writing a program have to do with mathematics, physics and so on?

      Calculators are used for more then computer sciences (in fact CS usage is but a marginal fraction of their usage), and computer sciences apply but a small fraction of mathematics and physics.

      You're essentially advocating cheating in one subject if you're good in another. Something no school worth a damn will ever accept. Else you would have to accept that a person with ability to write killer essays should be allowed to cheat on mathematics and physics as well.

    96. Re:Why? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. You have one big advantage: copy/paste.

    97. Re:Why? by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      No I'm saying to solve problems in one field you have to write the program for it. Writing a program to solve a trigonometry or physics problem doesn't just depend on your computer programing skills. You obviously have to know the algorithm yourself in order to make a computer execute it for you. By the time you've researched something, and converted the complicated algorithms into something the calculator can execute, odds are you've worked with it so much the formula itself is committed to memory anyway. I believe there was an old show where a kid spent all night copying down facts onto his shoes to cheat on a test, then when he got to the test he realized he spent so much time copying the stuff that it was committed to his memory anyway and didn't need to look at them. Same principle applies only most likely much deeper, because odds are you have to do a bit of troubleshooting and debugging, which requires you to repeatedly go over the steps to figure out which step is getting the wrong information.

    98. Re:Why? by mattventura · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. The firmware could be modified to not display that message.

    99. Re:Why? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      No it couldn't. Make it part of the boot ROM. Unless they guy is good at desoldering surface-mount chips...

      See TiVo and why it's not at all easily hackable (flash/replace OS). Same thing.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    100. Re:Why? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Currently the schools already dictate what calculator students are expected to buy (or rather, their parents are expected to buy). When I was in high school, it was the TI-82 (later the TI-83). And yes, the school had a case full of the things that I sometimes had to use during a test. Now, you could, at least when I was in school, use whatever calculator you wanted for regular classwork, but if you were given the approved TI model for a test you were expected to know how to use it.

    101. Re:Why? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Decent time sink to have each student turn on the calculator, wait for the checksum, verify it, move to the next student. Waiting for students to turn off their calculators because there will always be some who jump the gun.

      Why is that a problem? That'll only affect those students who choose to use a calculator. Those who are quicker to do the work long-hand or using log tables will have a trivial amount more work to do (trivial because you'd still be required to write down the intermediate stages of your calculation) compared to those who choose to invest around 10 minutes of their exam time queueing (metaphorically, not literally) for their computation devices to be validated.

      And in any case, you should spend the first 5-odd minutes of any exam READING THE FUCKING PAPER. You can perfectly well do that with one hand while waving your turned-off calculator in the air with the other. And if you can't spot the "easy points" questions to occupy the next 10 minutes, then you probably shouldn't be doing the exam.

      Disclaimer - before I was allowed to take the home's calculator to school, I had to prove to my father that I could handle logarithms perfectly adequately. I don't know what year the school allowed calculators, because that rule wasn't relevant. If I were incredibly to have children of my own, or found myself looking after someone else's sprog, I don't see any reason to not follow the same rules.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    102. Re:Why? by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      http://xkcd.com/768/ They're rediculously overpriced for such cheaply manufactured hardware. I can buy an xbox for less than a TI84.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    103. Re:Why? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      How about we rewrite these tests so you don't need a programmable calculator at all? There'd be no problem with cheating and it'd be cheaper for students.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    104. Re:Why? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Invented/discovered within the last 200 years or so:

      • Pretty much all of modern algebra (e.g. groups, rings, fields).
      • Pretty much all of statistics (which all sufficiently sciency undegraduates have to do).
      • Differential geometry, variational calculus etc.
      • Anything with the prefix "eigen".

      Invented/discovered within the last 100 years or so:

      • Pretty much all of post-classical formal logic (required for any computer science or philosophy degree).
      • Pretty much all of the maths required of modern physics (e.g. Lie algebra, operator calculus).
      • Pretty much all of the work on undecidability (Hilbert, Goedel, Turing).
      • All varieties of hypercomplex algebra (e.g. quaternions, Clifford algebra, Grassman algebra etc).
      • All of theoretical computer science.
      • All of category theory and, crucially, all of the language that comes with it.

      That's off the top of my head.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    105. Re:Why? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Why are we teaching children to do jobs that can be done by computers?

      Someone needs to teach the computer how to do it, and everyone needs to verify (even if only as an estimate) that the computer got it right. Do you really want a generation of kids who grow up to be Carol from Little Britain ?

      To me this all seems equivalent to teaching kids to farm using ox-powered plows rather than tractors [...]

      More like teaching kids how to play music on violins rather than MIDI sequencers.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    106. Re:Why? by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Invigilators are, for the most part, not equipped or trained to do all this. I was shocked when I was invigilating an exam last semester and the students DIDN'T have hacked calculators. I mean really, what self-respecting student, knowing that they were going to need a certain set of tools that they were not supposedto have in their calculator would not load it in knowing that they wouldn't be checked? I was told that our students are too lazy to cheat. Yeah right, but they weren't cheating it seemed. What is the world coming too?

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    107. Re:Why? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      I think you need to go back and check your history and what was what when. Eigen everything extisted before 1900 but just didn't have the German name. Prob. and Stats were well developed prior to 1900. Clifford? Dead before 1900. Etc. By your choices you have pretty much proven my point - that the math required for any undergrad and many PhD's has been around at least 100 years. And almost all of your choices are not applicable to the topic - using TI calculators. 'Algebra' in the college level is something that few students will see. and will they be using a calculator? Further, many of those higher level maths listed are applicable to only a very small subset of all PhD's (how many physics phds in a year? CS? Math? Not a large %)

    108. Re:Why? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      You need to look at the post more carefully, because I carefully split everything into "the last 200 years" vs "the last 100 years". The only one I screwed up was hypercomplex algebra; for some reason, I thought that the infamous piece of graffiti was only around 100 years old instead of 150.

      For example: Probability was indeed invented before 1900, but almost all of a first year undergraduate statistics course (which everyone from physicists to sociologists have to do) was invented within the last 200 years, and large swathes of it are 100 years old or less. The chi-squared test and t-test, for example, are only about 100 years old.

      I don't know where you did your degree, but if you didn't study any maths in your first year of undergraduate work that was less than 50 years old at the time, I'd demand a refund. That goes double if it was a computer science degree, where pretty much everything is less than 50 years old.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    109. Re:Why? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      That's what I mean by security theater. Because of the awkwardness of typing on a QWERTY layout keyboard with your thumbs, it was far faster to type on the TI-82. When you spend 4 years of math with a keyboard layout, there isn't much you can't do on it. You'll note that certain people can type faster than 60 WPM on cellphones.

      The QWERTY restriction is arbitrary.

  2. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I mean... Why? Why doesn't TI acknowledge the love that people have for it's products and create an API or something? If you constantly beat down the enthousiast crowd, I would think you shoot yourself in the foot in the long run.

  3. Well this is disappointing. by superslacker87 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember when the community broke the TI-92. What did TI do then? Release an upgraded version of it and made it easier ton write in assembly. What happened, TI? I no longer need your calculator products, but this is a sad thing to see.

    --
    I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    1. Re:Well this is disappointing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids these days can hack their Iphones and Android phones. Why waste your time hacking a calculator that looks like it's from 1999?

    2. Re:Well this is disappointing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get out of here. seriously.

    3. Re:Well this is disappointing. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      What happened to TI? They had a visit from Sony executives... after the doors closed all anyone heard was screams and a fight, the doors opened and all the TI execs said, "everything is all right, no need to be alarmed.... DRM is holy... DRM is good... All Hail the DRM....."

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Well this is disappointing. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Because only a idiot that does not know math at all would even TRY To do advanced mathematics on a touchscreen keypad/keyboard.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Well this is disappointing. by schnell · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that their calculators won't be allowable in standardized testing environments anymore if there is a likelihood that users are modifying the devices. I have never been part of the market for scientific calculators, so I'm not sure whether this is really a huge market for TI or just an excuse.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    6. Re:Well this is disappointing. by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Maple has a feature that lets you draw symbols with the mouse and select the corresponding function from a menu. This is unfathomably useful, and a far superior interface to the TI method of remembering which sub-menu contains the desired function, and then trying to deduce the syntax with no online manual.

    7. Re:Well this is disappointing. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I no longer need your calculator products

      And that is the rub, the main customers left for high end* calculators are students. They buy them because they aren't allowed to take laptops, smartphones etc into exams but in at least some institutions they are allowed to take in particular models of high end calculator.

      However high end calculators can also be used as cheating devices. Information that the students are supposed to remember can often be stored as can programs to do things the students are supposed to be able to do manually. Calculator vendors have responsed by introducing "exam modes" where the user is denied access to all memories and with some visual indication to allow invigilators to check the device is in exam mode. However this breaks down if cheaters can replace the firmware with one that pretends to be in exam mode but doesn't actually enforce the restrictions.

      My department at uni doesn't allow high end calculators in exams at all . Personally I think that is the way to go as it's perfectly possible to test what needs to be tested without any questions that require a high end calculator to answer. The calculator vendors certainly wouldn't like that endgame though.

      * by which I mean anything with more features than a basic "scientific" calculator.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:Well this is disappointing. by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Its a huge market. It might be something like 90% of the market for the better stuff. Teachers want to prepare students for the tests, which means they want them to be used to what they'll be using.

    9. Re:Well this is disappointing. by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      >> And that is the rub, the main customers left for high end* calculators are students.
      >> ... this breaks down if cheaters can replace the firmware with one that pretends to be in exam mode but doesn't actually enforce the restrictions.
      >> ... it's perfectly possible to test what needs to be tested without any questions that require a high end calculator to answer. ...
      >> * by which I mean anything with more features than a basic "scientific" calculator.

      Mod parent up. It gives all the rationale and the current state of calculators. I've always hate TI's, and loved my HP 48. There used to be a webpage (probably a geociteis or angelfire type) that had the "typical" EE: Khakis, MATLAB, and an HP48.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    10. Re:Well this is disappointing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hacked TI calculators could be used to cheat during exams where their models have been deemed "safe". If Ti doesn't aggressively fix these hacks, they may lose their standing as an allowable model.

  4. Even more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus making these TI products even less desireable.

    1. Re:Even more... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      For hackers, gamers and cheaters. None of whom are TI's target audience.

      On the other hand it makes them more desirable for target audience, schools.

  5. Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist friendly by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist friendly? Is there something out there that does allow hacking and programming?

  6. Why try to build a better mouse trap? by sohmc · · Score: 1

    I've said this a couple of times now but if manufacturers are so keen on not allowing the hacker community to do whatever they want with their property, why don't they just license the damn things? Seems to be a better way to get users to not tamper with the electronics (at least legally) and provides a legal recourse should they do so.

    Outside of warranty, what incentive is there for a company like TI or Apple to continue to build better mouse traps when the hacker community usually just cracks it within days for the sheer fact that TI and Apple don't want them to?

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
    1. Re:Why try to build a better mouse trap? by Arlet · · Score: 1

      To properly license something, it needs to have periodical payments or something like that to make a proper distinction between a sale. You can't just sell something, and call it "licensing".

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/11/28/us_court_ruling_nixes_software/

  7. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by tepples · · Score: 1

    Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist friendly?

    Archos 43. Or any other Android-powered device for that matter. But don't expect to be able to use it on standardized tests.

  8. Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

    This kind of behavior is why my wife got a HP 50G for her birthday, rather than the TI-92. As far as I know, HP doesn't care one whit about what you do with their calculators, just as long as you give them money for the initial purchase.

    1. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by lavagolemking · · Score: 1

      That's great an all, except for when you can't take that calculator into an exam. Texas Instruments gets a guarantee of business from schools in return for fighting innovation, which is why their prices are so high.

    2. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't take a TI into any exam that matters.
      Fuck this HS bullshit. I used my 82 maybe twice in college. For everything else I had to use my FE approved calculator: A $10 HP.

    3. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by cgenman · · Score: 1

      You also can't take the TI-92 into exams.

    4. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      One of the things exams test is ability to solve certain kinds of problems on your own. If your calculator is too advanced, and can solve the problem for you, it nullifies the point of the exam.

    5. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      except for when you can't take that calculator into an exam.

      For NCEES stuff, you can't use any nice calculator.
      Given their list, I'd choose the HPs.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Then the point of the exam has already been nullified, and they need to stop giving that exam forever.

      It's like saying that every carpenter needs to be able to make their own brace and bit, and use that to drill holes. They don't learn that any more, they don't need to, they have some very lovely power drills that can do the job hundreds of times faster.

      If the function of doing something by hand has already been replaced by a machine, teach how to use the machine. Don't bother with the cruft that people will never use again, and know they'll never use again.

      And sure, there will be a few people who want to do it the old way. We call these people hobbyists, and they'll learn how to do it on their own. That goes for the mathematical functions, and the old brace and bit. We don't need to be testing it, and we certainly don't need to be emphasizing it in any sort of mandatory class.

    7. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You're strawmanning the argument, with straw being a molecule sized one. It's extremely obvious that mathematics, physics and other scientific subjects are incremental - a pupil needs a good base, on which he can build understanding of more advanced aspects of the subject.

      You are claiming that this is in fact false, and that we should just (to make an extreme example) skip teaching addition and multiplication and just go to teaching kids integral mathematics right away. Except that isn't possible, as kids won't have the base to understand what the hell integration is.

      The main difference between teaching something, and applying something is that when teaching you need to go to basics, and teach those first and then advance from there, whereas when applying you do not have to go through basics and can apply advanced techniques right away. You just attempted to superimpose application over teaching while talking about teaching. If you are a teacher, this would be the point where you should consider going back to school and going over the basics of what teaching is all about.

    8. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      I am not strawmanning the argument.

      And I would argue that arithmetic has very little to do with advanced mathematics, and doesn't need to be taught as a base, short of a very cursory explanation, given that once one understands the concept of how it works, there's no need at all to keep doing it by hand, and in fact even before one understands the concept, the tool (a calculator) should be taught. Follow the "here's how you do this" with "here's how this works" rather than the other way around.

      The way we've historically tried to "build the base" doesn't work for the VAST majority of humans. Mathematics education is a dismal failure, except for the very few students who learn that way. It's time to fix it.

      And if another multiplication table is never memorized, the world will be none the worse for it.

    9. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You would do well do educate yourself in how our brain's abstraction capability works if you ever want to even touch someone's education. For otherwise, it would be whoever you teach that will end up paying the price for your ignorance.

      Perhaps then you would understand why "basic arithmetic" is necessary for teaching advanced mathematics, and why basic singe digit multiplication table is taught all over the world before advanced mathematics.

    10. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What exams that disallow the HP-50G also don't disallow the TI-89?

    11. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Your concept of "how our brain's abstraction capability works" is clearly incomplete, as that's a current area of research where we really don't have anywhere close to a complete picture. If you're claiming that it's something that one can educate oneself about by looking at a textbook, you're sadly mistaken.

      And if you're actually claiming that rote memorization of a multiplication table is in any way applicable to advanced mathematics, you're absolutely incorrect, and it is actually harmful to many students.

      Current mathematics education techniques are very successful with a very small percentage of students, and an abject failure with the vast majority. And a big part of that is the fact that basic arithmetic has very little to do with advanced math.

    12. Re:Customer Abuse = Customer Refuse by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Then you're claiming that education system that essentially made over 99% of population in industrialized countries capable of reading, writing, performing basic mathematical necessities like calculating their own budget, managing bank statements and taxes, and served as a platform to enable almost a third of all people in industrialised countries to get a highly specialised education is a "failure"?

      You sure have some strict requirements to call something a success.

      And on subject of math, yes, multiplication table is also taught in countries that have over 70% of total working population have a bachelor's or master's degree at least like Nordic countries, or South Korea. I'm not just talking about USA.

      And personally I find it hard to imagine how I would be able to manage anything more then basic mathematic formulas without having double digit multiplication table learnt. As in I could, it's just that solving would take me several times longer as I would have to abstract the math instead of just using the numbers I learnt already.

      It's comparable to writing an essay in a foreign language where you understand the language structure and basic words, but have to go through the dictionary for almost every word you write. It's doable - it will just take you many times longer. And in the end, you'll just end up memorizing it anyway, because that's how our brain works - memorized things are accessed fast and do not tax our ability to perform complex abstractions such as higher level mathematics, while actually abstracting every concept and calculating taxes our brain severely rendering it's ability to perform other similar tasks, such as higher level math itself unavailable until the other similar task has finished.

      This is a well known and researched flaw in our brain, originating from the fact that it is a specialized computing system designed for needs of a caveman - not a modern person. As a result it can only run one similar task that requires abstraction (such as calculations) at a time efficiently, and any attempt to multitask destroys the performance. And that is why modern successful school system works around it by getting student to memorize things they will need often - so in case of advanced mathematics they can perform tasks that require basic math and advanced math to be done at the same time efficiently.

  9. They do license the damn things by tepples · · Score: 1

    I've said this a couple of times now but if manufacturers are so keen on not allowing the hacker community to do whatever they want with their property, why don't they just license the damn things?

    Companies do "license the damn things", but sometimes only to other established companies. One example is Nintendo, which requires a dedicated secure office and a previous commercial game on another platform out of any licensee. And even when they do license to individuals, people complain about the $99 per year fee to run your own programs on your own hardware that Microsoft pioneered (App Hub) and Apple standardized (iPhone developer program).

    1. Re:They do license the damn things by sohmc · · Score: 2

      IANAL but if, for example, Apple says, "You aren't purchasing an iPhone. You're purchasing a license to use the iPhone. By using it, you agree not to jailbreak the phone. If you do, we'll take you to court and you will have to pay us $2000 and can not use any other Apple products for five years."

      While not very customer friendly, I don't see the difference between this and constantly trying to outsmart the hackers.

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
    2. Re:They do license the damn things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jailbraking iphones (or other cell phones) in the USA is legal, it has an exception in the DMCA, nothing Apple can do about it through the courts. You are not signing any agreement when you buy a pre-owned iphone. They may block you from buying through their store and try to reflash the FW if you connect to itunes, but that's about the limit.

    3. Re:They do license the damn things by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      The difference is legal. If you jailbreak an iPhone which you own, there's not much they can do beyond trying to make it harder to jailbreak it. If you jailbreak an iPhone which you license, they can just legally say: "You broke our license, give back the iPhone!" And they can even enforce it.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:They do license the damn things by afidel · · Score: 1

      Because first sale doctrine means they get to go pound sand. They ARE selling me a physical thing which means I own it, not them. I really am disturbed that anyone reading Slashdot would think that what you're proposing is a good or possible idea.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:They do license the damn things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The corporations would love that. But, it can't happen in the USA ... yet.

  10. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by bmo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The HP series of graphing calculators allow hacking and programming.

    On the 50g, you can write in RPL, Saturn Assembly, C and ARM Assembly. It uses an ARM processor to emulate the Saturn processor that came in the 48.

    While the 50g is not as nice physically as the 48gx in terms of keyboard, it's miles ahead of the 49. Stay away from the 49 and the 48gII.

    --
    BMO

  11. TI - dead technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and working hard to stay that way...

    Why would I want to buy a product from a company that so hates it's customers?

    1. Re:TI - dead technology... by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would I want to buy a product from a company that so hates it's customers?

      Two reasons: 1. If you don't buy one you can't do the homework and quizzes and thus fail the class. 2. If you pull out an Android device during downtime in class (even in flight mode) it gets confiscated by faculty, but if you pull out a TI product you're fine.

    2. Re:TI - dead technology... by khallow · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help but notice that most people don't have homework or quizzes. They don't have "faculty. Surely, it wouldn't cripple TI to make models that aren't intended for the limited purpose of taking tests.

    3. Re:TI - dead technology... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Surely, it wouldn't cripple TI to make models that aren't intended for the limited purpose of taking tests.

      And those models would be intended for...what, exactly? What purpose does a TI calculator serve these days that could not be better served by an Android phone, a tablet, or a netbook? Calculators today are for people taking tests who are prohibited from having connected or truly capable devices. They have no other purpose.

    4. Re:TI - dead technology... by khallow · · Score: 1

      What purpose does a TI calculator serve these days that could not be better served by an Android phone, a tablet, or a netbook?

      It's specialized role as a calculator, of course. It's far cheaper, it's better at the role than the tools you mention, and it has much longer battery life.

    5. Re:TI - dead technology... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Calculator apps can be had for Androids, tablets, *and* netbooks. People are not going to spend money and cart around an extra piece of junk that's only a calculator. And they don't.

    6. Re:TI - dead technology... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Calculator apps can be had for Androids, tablets, *and* netbooks.

      But which such device has 20 to 40 hotkeys for mathematical functions at the user's fingertips?

      People are not going to spend money and cart around an extra piece of junk

      ...that's only a battery. How long does a TI product last on one set of four NiMH AAAs?

    7. Re:TI - dead technology... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Calculator apps can be had for Androids, tablets, *and* netbooks.

      And they are less capable at that specialized role.

      People are not going to spend money and cart around an extra piece of junk that's only a calculator. And they don't.

      I always haul along a calculator (solar powered too). I don't have much less haul a smartphone or other gear you mentioned. It's only "junk" if you don't use it.

    8. Re:TI - dead technology... by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      People are not going to spend money and cart around an extra piece of junk that's only a calculator. And they don't.

      In which field are you working ? In mine (aerospace), they do.

    9. Re:TI - dead technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many calculators do you suppose are sold by TI to schools or schoolchildren compared to being sold to others? People outside of schools don't even make a blip on TI's radar.

    10. Re:TI - dead technology... by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Calculator apps can be had for Androids, tablets, *and* netbooks.

      And they are less capable at that specialized role.

      Technically true, but getting less so all the time. And if you don't need the extra tools, there is a benefit to using your android/tablet/netbook - namely, you're using the tool you already carry with you.

      Kid might forget his calculator at home, but he's less likely to forget his iPod.

  12. Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendly by syousef · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    http://www.libreoffice.org/features/calc/
    http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/
    http://maxima.sourceforge.net/
    http://www.scilab.org/
    http://www.scicoslab.org/
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_programming_language

    Fuck desktop calculators. Fuck nostalgia from 70s engineers and programmers who think RPN is the shite because it works like a computer stack. Repeating anything if you get even the slightest thing wrong, or heck, even checking it is a time consuming nightmare on any desktop calculator. Spreadsheets and programmable math environments have FAR superceded dinky desktop calculators.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  13. Does anyone even use these any more? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    I remember being FORCED to buy a TI graphing calculator in order to pass a college mathematics course. I remember all we needed it for was to plot graphs, which could have been (and probably should have been) done on paper. I didn't really learn anything by using it, except how to use the calculator. I used it for a couple months and then promptly sold it when I was done with the course.
    What a scam by my college and TI.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Does anyone even use these any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember a case where in school I had a TI Voyage 200 calculator and was working on an engineering degree, part way through the program some genius in the engineering department figured ti would be a good idea for the mechanical engineers to get a BA in addition to the masters. so having completed calc 3 and various other math courses I was required to go back and take a statistics course under the purview of the business school not the math department.

      the class required a TI 84+ or better

      I failed this course due to not being able to say to solve this program i press button x then button y and menu option c with variables x,y,z
      I was actually doing the math and the teacher could not figure out how I was getting the correct answer with out using the built in apps.

      The flowing semester the course was amended to say Requires a TI 84+. I never did pass the course or get the BA but I still got my licence.

  14. Huh by Lord+Lode · · Score: 2

    So it's a programmable calculator, but users are not allowed to actually programmed it?

    I think calculators started to such around the point where the target audience was students doing exams that impose certain restrictions on calculators, instead of engineers.

    1. Re:Huh by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      s/programmed/program
      s/such/suck

    2. Re:Huh by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but most people in technical fields just use PC software to do the same things. Our tools are now much more powerful AND more configurable (depending on what tools you use). For the most part, graphing/programmable calculators really don't do anything but help with tests these days.

      --
      The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
    3. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think calculators started to such around the point where the target audience was students doing exams that impose certain restrictions on calculators, instead of engineers.

      Well, yes. The engineers prefer MATLAB at their office or in a company laptop, should they need to visit the shop floor. Seldom there is need for such a mobility and independence of electric grid that graphical calculator is the only tool available.

    4. Re:Huh by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      You can program it, but only in TI-BASIC, not assembly. TI-BASIC is an interpreted language, so naturally it's very slow and limited to textual I/O. The assembly programs were powerful enough to make clearing the calculators a problem, since they could run virtual consoles that didn't clear the memory as instructed.

      IMO, the requirement to clear the memory of a graphical calculator is ridiculous. I live in Australia, and every test/exam I've had in secondary school and uni either allowed graphical calculators and was open book, or was closed book and allowed at most a scientific calculator. It was expected that we would use programs during the math exams to speed up things like the Euler method for approximation.

      Clearing the calculator's memory is incredibly labour intensive - if you're not going to provide the calculators used for the tests, you may as well admit that you have no control over them. When you're looking at something like a state level exam (we now have national ones) that allows a range of different calculators, training those invigilators (who are usually senior citizens with nothing better to do, since letting teachers supervise for a national exam runs the risk of bias/turning a blind eye) further increases the difficulty involved.

      To insist on rote problems that can be easily solved by the simple application of logic (and thus an extremely basic program) is to remain in the past - as technology develops, the focus should be increasingly on understanding how to state the problem using mathematical notation. e.g. understanding area is expressed through integrals, then letting a calculator/computer actually calculate that integral. Where there is a need to learn those basics (such as how to calculate the integral), it makes sense to have a closed book/tech free exam. For the last years of secondary school in Australia, each math subject has 2 exams - one which allows the use of notes and a graphical calculator, and one which does not. The one which allows the use of notes is consistently recognized as the more difficult of the two, since it requires students to actually understand what they are doing rather than simply reciting formulae.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  15. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by bmo · · Score: 1

    Half of the utility of a calculator is a decent keyboard and layout. Sorry, but an HP48 from 1993 or 41cx or even a 15c from the 1980s wipes the floor with all PDAs and phones.

    Indeed, there is going to be a reissue of the 15c this June.

    --
    BMO

  16. But are they pocket friendly? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Fuck desktop calculators.

    And then you go on to list a bunch of software that turns a desktop computer into a desktop calculator. Have you any recommendations for a counterpart to Maxima designed to run on a handheld device?

    1. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by syousef · · Score: 0

      Fuck desktop calculators.

      And then you go on to list a bunch of software that turns a desktop computer into a desktop calculator. Have you any recommendations for a counterpart to Maxima designed to run on a handheld device?

      Calling what I listed "a bunch of software that turns a desktop computer into a desktop calculator" is about as asinine as you can get. The software goes so far beyond what a handheld calculator can do that it isn't funny. You might as well compare a donkey drawn cart to the Space Shuttle.

      It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      [quote]It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.[/quote]
      No, it isn't. Unless your level of geekdom is over 9000, that is.

      --

      Your head a splode
    3. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      [quote]It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.[/quote] No, it isn't. Unless your level of geekdom is over 9000, that is.

      Absolutely. If I go down to the supermarket I might have to compare unit prices, total cash etc - so a small calculator in my pocket is a good idea. I am unlikely to come across anything needing a laptop's power or find it worth carrying one. At geek levels of 8500 or more you may well not be able to resist trying to optimise the queuing at checkouts or simulate the airflow for optimum placement of air-conditioning outlets, freezers and doorways.

    4. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Er, I wasnt aware you could do 3d graphing on LibreOffice calc, factor algebraic equations, solve for x, or any of the other basic things a good decent TI-82 equivalent can do (and those things are like 20 years old).
      Octave appears to be a programming language, that is, that I cant simply plug in Y=3x+z^2 and get a graph. Hooray for reducing simplicity! Hooray for complexity for its own sake!

      Seriously, it sounds like youre either trolling, or have never used a TI-82+ equivalent. They are easy enough for a budding 7th grader to use, powerful enough for real world use, and have a quite nice BASIC programming function (which I credit for getting me into the world of computers). And honestly, I dont know what math class would allow you to bring a laptop in, or why its fair to compare a $100 (new) TI or HP calc to a $450 laptop.

    5. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by syousef · · Score: 2

      Er, I wasnt aware you could do 3d graphing on LibreOffice calc, factor algebraic equations, solve for x, or any of the other basic things a good decent TI-82 equivalent can do (and those things are like 20 years old).
      Octave appears to be a programming language, that is, that I cant simply plug in Y=3x+z^2 and get a graph. Hooray for reducing simplicity! Hooray for complexity for its own sake!

      Seriously, it sounds like youre either trolling, or have never used a TI-82+ equivalent. They are easy enough for a budding 7th grader to use, powerful enough for real world use, and have a quite nice BASIC programming function (which I credit for getting me into the world of computers). And honestly, I dont know what math class would allow you to bring a laptop in, or why its fair to compare a $100 (new) TI or HP calc to a $450 laptop.

      There's not a lot that one of the pieces of software I listed can't do.

      Octave requires 4 lines for a 3D plot
      http://math.jacobs-university.de/oliver/teaching/iub/resources/octave/octave-intro/octave-intro.html#SECTION00052000000000000000

      But I LOVE the way you gibber on that I can't possibly have used a TI calculator having just dismissed Octave without doing a simple Google search. Way to be logically consistent.

      There is a SHITLOAD of math software out there. Many of these pieces of software will overcome almost any limitation of your TI calc.

      Here's a good one for simple graphing that I've used extensively some time ago (almost 2 decades! i started on the DOS version). Doesn't seem to be supported anymore but still works.
      http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~meredith/X(PLORE)/xplorepg.html

      As for cost, a laptop will do a lot more than your calc - unless you're telling me your calc will edit photos and let you write email? So that extra couple of hundred dollars is well spent.

      As for exams and laptops not permitted it isn't my fault or problem that Uni examinations are idiotic and set by lazy academics who don't know or care what counts in the real world - they're the same idiots who can't kick their 70s thinking that I was talking about in the first palce. By all means buy a calc to pass the test...but then don't complain the fucking thing isn't hackable.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by syousef · · Score: 1

      [quote]It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.[/quote]
      No, it isn't. Unless your level of geekdom is over 9000, that is.

      Absolutely. If I go down to the supermarket I might have to compare unit prices, total cash etc - so a small calculator in my pocket is a good idea. I am unlikely to come across anything needing a laptop's power or find it worth carrying one. At geek levels of 8500 or more you may well not be able to resist trying to optimise the queuing at checkouts or simulate the airflow for optimum placement of air-conditioning outlets, freezers and doorways.

      For that simple arithmetic use the calc on your mobile phone - you're not going to want to carry a TI or HP calc around just to add grocery bills.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by syousef · · Score: 1

      [quote]It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.[/quote]
      No, it isn't. Unless your level of geekdom is over 9000, that is.

      For basic math use your goddamn mobile phone, not a HP or TI calc!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      Well, of course, but where did I say otherwise? I keep me HP48G on my desk at home.

      --

      Your head a splode
    9. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by tepples · · Score: 1

      For basic math use your goddamn mobile phone

      Two years of smartphone service cost far more than a TI or HP calculator plus two years of dumbphone service.

    10. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      [quote]It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.[/quote]
      No, it isn't. Unless your level of geekdom is over 9000, that is.

      Absolutely. If I go down to the supermarket I might have to compare unit prices, total cash etc - so a small calculator in my pocket is a good idea. I am unlikely to come across anything needing a laptop's power or find it worth carrying one. At geek levels of 8500 or more you may well not be able to resist trying to optimise the queuing at checkouts or simulate the airflow for optimum placement of air-conditioning outlets, freezers and doorways.

      For that simple arithmetic use the calc on your mobile phone - you're not going to want to carry a TI or HP calc around just to add grocery bills.

      What about the calculator in your head? Someone talking about 'geek level' shouldn't need a calculator for simple arithmetic.

    11. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      My "dumb phone" includes a calculator. It's clunky, but it's there, and it's already paid for. It's possible to own a dumber phone (Moto F1, e.g.) but you don't get a discount for extra stupid phones.

    12. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a cell phone. Get a graphing calculator program for the phone.

    13. Re:But are they pocket friendly? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. If I go down to the supermarket I might have to compare unit prices, total cash etc - so a small calculator in my pocket is a good idea.

      Or just learn to do that kind of simple everyday math in your head. An exact value is almost never needed - just a rough estimate. If you're calculating unit prices and you have to start carrying more than 2 sigfigs, they're close enough (a few pennies). If you're buying so much that it matters, well you'd be sitting at your desk with a spreadsheet and arranging discounts that way.

      It's kind of a pity people seem to nee dot whip out a calculator for even basic math of not-very-big-numbers, or lack the ability to estimate. Hell, one should be able to look at the change in their pocket and figure out that if they don't have exact, still figure out what would get them to a convenient amount (e.g., if you have two pennies and the price ends in a "7" you can use the two and get a nickel back rather than 3 pennies). I never understood the jars full of coins - and always detested when I had a pocket full of change of various denominations and knew there was no way to make convenient change.

      It's why we use the 1-5-10-25 system for coins - it's algorithmically simple to make change ("greedy" algorithm) and adds really quickly.

      And while I don't calculate the exact totals, I know roughly how much everything costs and add tax, so I have a ceiling amount - if it costs more, something's wrong. (A bit tricky with groceries since some of it is taxed and some isn't, but if you're determining ceilings, it works).

  17. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by bmo · · Score: 0

    >all desktop applications

    Yeah, try dragging a PC or even a laptop with you as you swing a machete with 40-50 pounds of gear on your back.

    Or try stuffing a PC into your toolbox.

    Not everyone works behind a desk.

    You're an ivory tower weenie. Shut up.

    --
    BMO

  18. Asked and answered by tepples · · Score: 2
    Anonymous Coward wrote:

    Why waste your time hacking a calculator that looks like it's from 1999?

    I answered that in this comment.

  19. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forgot sage.

  20. (OT) Your sig. by mrthoughtful · · Score: 1

    char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}

    Okay, so a source-self-replicator is nice - it got me thinking - how about a self-replicator with an awareness of it's generation-count?

    long x=0; char*f="long x=%u; char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,x+1,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,x+1,34,f,34);}

    Each successive generation is identified by x

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:(OT) Your sig. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}

      Okay, so a source-self-replicator is nice

      What would happen if that code was run on an EBCDIC machine?
      (Oh, and using printf without previous declaration is not allowed in standard C.)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  21. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a plan, please tell the administrators that I need to have a laptop for taking my exams....

    MORON.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  22. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. Have you just been unfrozen?

  23. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by syousef · · Score: 0

    >all desktop applications

    Yeah, try dragging a PC or even a laptop with you as you swing a machete with 40-50 pounds of gear on your back.

    Or try stuffing a PC into your toolbox.

    Not everyone works behind a desk.

    You're an ivory tower weenie. Shut up.

    --
    BMO

    How old are you? 3? How am I suppose to respond to "You're an ivory tower weenie. Shut up.". Schoolyard taunt? Grow the fuck up.

    Last time I checked a hiking backpack and a small laptop were an option for most. You can even get toughened notebooks. You'd know that if you ever held a machete you arrogant ass. But I somehow don't see an image of you walking through the jungle with a machete in one hand and your HP or TI calculator in the other even semi realistic.

    Go troll somewhere else, and make it believable.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  24. Biting the hand that feeds you by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    Why do companies so despise their customers?

    1. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Because there is a profit in it?

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by senorpoco · · Score: 1

      touche

    3. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      Isn't there more profit in not despising customers? I mean, if the product is better people are more likely to want it and such...

    4. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Short term profit may come with lifetime rejection (Sony, are you listening?).

    5. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gamers, hackers and cheaters aren't their target customers. Schools are. TI loves schools. Hence it does everything to please them. Such as preventing tampering.

    6. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do companies so despise their customers?

      Because you mistake who the customer really is. You are not the customer, the US school systems are. They are trying to corner the educational calculator market. If you can customize the calculator, it can do things that a teacher will not be able prevent/know about such as hiding notes and more.look at what calculators are permitted for use on standardized tests...and look at which ones try hardest to prevent hacking.

    7. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Lionel+Debroux · · Score: 1

      Or at least, "trying to prevent tampering" and "trying to make regulation authorities believe that we're preventing tampering"... but as a matter of fact, persistently failing at preventing tampering :)

    8. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the problem may well be related to standardized tests.
      TI will obviously want to claim that no-one can install any other OS than theirs, as if one could do that, one could make the calculator, say, not delete all memory when told to do so before the exam. However, apart from that, I see no reason why one should not allow them to be programmed, it is standard procedure to clear all memory on such a calculator before a standardised test.

    9. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as Facebook's customers are not their users but their advertisers, so TI's customers are not the students who buy the calculators but the schools and school boards that make them compulsory.

      TI has very little to gain by making their products hacker-friendly, and it has a lot to lose: if their calculators are not considered safe enough for use on a standardized test, they will not be allowed anymore, resulting in a huge drop in revenue.

      Of course, any dedicated hacker will interpret anti-tampering measures as a challenge. Thank you, software publishers of the 1980s, for giving a whole generation of nerds a reason to learn assembly language: cracking copy protection schemes.

    10. Re:Biting the hand that feeds you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why don't they just burn their software to ROM and only supply enough RAM/flash to store some variables? And let the schools buy the things and store them in school? If you make the device read-only and inaccessible you don't have these problems.

  25. Spurious analogy time. by senorpoco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just bought a pork joint, now the instructions on the packaging are very clear on how to roast the thing but I was going to dry rub it and then smoke it for a few hours. Does anyone know if pork comes with DRM to stop me doing that or will I get a DMCA takedown notice halfway through smoking?

    1. Re:Spurious analogy time. by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Yes. The pork DRM package is called Trichinella Spiralis. If you trigger the DRM by using the pork in ways not specified in the pork EULA, well... have you ever seen the movie "Alien"?

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Spurious analogy time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm not so sure the pig would think too highly of your plans, but it's a little late for that, I suppose...

    3. Re:Spurious analogy time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just bought a [...] joint,[...] I was going to [...] smoke it for a few hours. Does anyone know [...] will I get a DMCA takedown notice halfway through smoking?

      You'll probably get a DEA takedown very shortly.

      (This editing brought to you by James E. O'Keefe III)

    4. Re:Spurious analogy time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a pork joint, now the instructions on the packaging are very clear on how to roast the thing but I was going to dry rub it and then smoke it for a few hours. Does anyone know if pork comes with DRM to stop me doing that or will I get a DMCA takedown notice halfway through smoking?

      No, but a member of the RIAA (Recipe Industry Association of America) will be visiting your BBQ, uninvited, to taste said pork in order to determine if you are offering an unauthorized recipe reproduction to your neighbors.

      If, as far as the RIAA can tell, you are pork-sharing with your neighbors, the homeowner of record will receive a threatening letter from Home, Robbers & Owing demanding that you admit you have infringed on their pork recipes, cease and desist from all neighborhood pork-sharing and pay 200x the cost of your pork at once.

      Should you not pay up, the RIAA and HRO may take you to court for your unauthorized distribution of pork, claiming that their recipe rights have been violated. As damages in previous cases have reached 62500x the cost of the original pork, you may be inclined to settle.

      If you rent, or are otherwise not the homeowner of record, they may have to refile their "John Doe" lawsuit to name you--but rest assured, they will leave no coal uncharred in their pursuit of your infringing neighborhood pork BBQ.

      Let the message be clear: You and your pork will be smoked out.

    5. Re:Spurious analogy time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a minute, I thought the drug trade had come up with a new Islamic-unfriendly mary-jane product... but no... it's food. That's what happens when I don't have enough coffee in the morning...

    6. Re:Spurious analogy time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but that pork joint you purchased did not come with dry rub compatibility. In an attempt to prevent losses from our dry rub enabled product line we have coated the surface of your pork joint with a chemical enforcer. The high temperature environment of roasting ensures our honest customers remain unaffected, while any other use of this product will result in severe flu like symptoms. We assure you however that this chemical is safe and will not disrupt your normal eating seqence in any way.

  26. Disappointed by pgn674 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am disappointed with TI. My first programming language was TI-BASIC on the TI-83 Plus. My second was assembly for the Z80 processor on that calculator. Both were supported by TI (the program used to transfer assembly programs from a computer to the calculator was produced and distributed by TI). It is the reason I chose to pursue computer science in college, and has made me the happy programmer I am today. It is sad TI does not want to allow today's youth the same opportunity through the same means.

    1. Re:Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I started programming on a regular basis on my TI-89, in 2000. I had already done a bit of C before, but I did TI-BASIC for a while, and then I switched to C and 68000 ASM. Thousands of people working today in IT industry can relate the same kind of experience as you and me can.

      Nowadays, the choice of student-accessible platforms with programming ability is wider than it used to be ten years ago. And these platforms are much more powerful than even Nspires are. But programming for mildly resource-constrained platforms such as calculators remains important for getting some sense of the hardware's capacities and limitations. Neither CPU nor memory are seemingly infinite resources, and it's valuable to be aware of that.
      Pushing the envelope of the platform is a rewarding challenge, certainly more than being a programmer among millions doing stuff in high-level highly abstracted languages on '2011 smartphones.

    2. Re:Disappointed by Gkeeper80 · · Score: 1

      Same here, thought I started on the TI-85 a few years earlier and even tried to build my own connector cable to my PC (failed miserably). The manual for that calculator was the only time I've completely cracked the spine of a book from over use and writing programs was the one thing that kept me interested in high school math. I guess the supported programming language is still available, but researching the Z80 instruction set was the first time I really understood what computers did.

    3. Re:Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A happy programmer?

      No way! That's not possible today!

    4. Re:Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my first language too; I programmed all equation for algebra to calculus, and had it do unit conversions for me too.

    5. Re:Disappointed by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I long ago tired of TI kkkeey bbounce on my TI-55, then one day during a dynamics & equilibria test one segment died on the display of my TI-55 II, and I had to multiply many of my answers by 10 to see if the exponent changed (10^-5 vs 10^-6). After that I tossed the thing and my sister chipped in so I could get an HP 15C. Twenty-eight years later, the HP looks and works like new, and is on it's lifetime *second* set of batteries. I never understood the appeal of a graphing calculator.

  27. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by JosJuice · · Score: 0

    The TI-84+(SE) is the best for programming - lots of possibilities, lots of existing programs, and very few limitations. They aren't the most powerful ones when it comes to math, but they're good enough.

  28. Sharp EL-9000 by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    I own one of those, and calculators were *never* allowed in my avionics classes, besides 4-function ones

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    1. Re:Sharp EL-9000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      four functions? Surely two would suffice. Subtraction is the same as addition and Multiplication is just a nice to have to stop you having to press the 'equals' key 655246 times in a row.......

    2. Re:Sharp EL-9000 by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Hah! You got a addition and multiplication? ALL we got was one flip-flop and a lookup-table book written in cuneiform.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    3. Re:Sharp EL-9000 by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Well in an avionics class I'd hope they'd at least let you use your E6-B. Last calculator you'll ever need!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    4. Re:Sharp EL-9000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got a whole flip-flop? All we got was a bucket full of NOR gates. And we had to find our own wire!

    5. Re:Sharp EL-9000 by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      :)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  29. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by c0p0n · · Score: 1

    Ditto, I still use regularly my HP48G, best calculator I've ever owned hands down. Once one masters the reverse polsih notation there's nothing better to do calculations.

    --

    Your head a splode
  30. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't people got anything better to do than hack a calculator? Hasn't TI got any better ideas than worrying about calculator hacking? Sheesh.

  31. Where are the open source calculators? by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Rather than watching this fascinating game of ping pong year after year, when will someone finally make a move and introduce a scientific calculator that runs on an open platform?

    Instead of whining about what TI won't let you do, why not apply those skills and help create a calculator that will let you do whatever it is you want to do?

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Where are the open source calculators? by Lionel+Debroux · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that this idea has already surfaced over the years, and multiple times at that ? ;)
      But the fact remains that no viable "open source calculator" model ever surfaced.

    2. Re:Where are the open source calculators? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I would submit though that we are getting closer to that day. With open source CPU cores being announced and the plethora of ARM devices, all that is needed is a keyboard and display. I suspect that with e readers eventually being blister-packed, that all the components will soon be readily available.

      Though they may not real world practical for students as they probably will not be allowed into exams.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  32. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by bmo · · Score: 1

    >You'd know that if you ever held a machete you arrogant ass. But I somehow don't see an image of you walking through the jungle with a machete in one hand and your HP or TI calculator in the other even semi realistic.

    It's called land surveying. Get out of your basement.

    --
    BMO

  33. the law says you can hack you phone and unlock it by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    the law says you can hack your phone (for any app) and unlock it (for any network) as well.

  34. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    If you think you can toughen a laptop, with a 10+" screen, large keyboard, large LION battery, heatsinks, fans, and all, up to the same standard you can with a 2" by 4" calculator, you are sadly mistaken. Larger more complex devices are by nature harder to ruggedize, especially when the screen gets large enough to be able to flex and break.

    Not to mention ruggedizing it (adding a solid steel frame to the screen, for example) would add quite a bit to the weight and cost, so all of a sudden we're talking about a $1500 laptop weighing 3kg, vs a $100 calculator weighing 250 grams. And for what gain? To use an OS not designed for mathmatics, on a device with 1/50th of the battery life?

  35. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >all desktop applications

    Yeah, try dragging a PC or even a laptop with you as you swing a machete with 40-50 pounds of gear on your back.

    Or try stuffing a PC into your toolbox.

    Not everyone works behind a desk.

    You're an ivory tower weenie. Shut up.

    Another tough guy on the Internet. I've done it, and I was a Cav Scout for six years.

    In the Army you're almost guaranteed to have a guy hauling computer equipment nowadays. And they've had guys hauling electronics back when it was made with vacuum tubes.

    For a while, I was the CO's RTO (radio / telephone operator) and while training our unit was stuck with old SINGCARS radios. (Not surprisingly, all the newest stuff goes to the front lines.) These are the big 20 pound radios that get loaded into a pack, and were probably pretty cutting edge in the '70s. But I loaded that into a ruck, along with another 20 pounds of crap, and a rifle strapped to my leg, and then jumped out of an airplane.

    Some people would bring laptops and playstations on training exercises if there was a lot of downtime and the command didn't care. Obviously you'd wrap it up in trashbags, but it's just like taking care of anything else that's not waterproof.

    When I deployed, I took my laptop with me all over Iraq. Nothing toughened or any of that crap, just a regular MacBook Pro. A few times I popped it open to blow out sand w/ compressed air while doing the same to clean my rifle.

    We obviously had tents full of computer systems. Some of them were in big green tough containers, but there were plenty of regular PCs, too. It takes some doing to get all that stuff set up, power is a PITA, the horrible sand there requires constant cleaning, but you can certainly do it.

  36. I don't see why this is such a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's cool if you can hack into something and re-purpose it, but...

    TI is not selling you a bag of programmable chips or a development platform. They are selling a finished product. They have every right to put hardware and software together any way they choose and if you buy it you should expect it to work as advertised. If you manage to put your own firmware in it and pwn the device, then it essentially becomes the bag of chips and you can do what you want. But now you must support it, not TI. Don't expect to install their OS releases and keep your custom code. They have no obligation to legitimize modifications to their device.

    1. Re:I don't see why this is such a big deal by Lionel+Debroux · · Score: 1

      You're partially missing the point ;)
      On the one hand, of course, TI is actively trying to block arbitrary native code execution on the platform - and failing at it.
      But on the other hand, Lua programming is about using something that TI themselves (silently) put into the OS. And TI broke what we had been using so far, documents made of compressed+encrypted part copied from TI's own documents and a part merely compressed. We're back to a situation where only TI can _easily_ generate Lua documents that OS 3.0.2 understands... until the encryption of all document parts is documented and replicated by third parties...

  37. Not allowed to even use nspire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I can tell (starting college this summer) I'm not even allowed to use an Nspire. Has to be a ti-83 or 84 (plus/silver) I think 89s are allowed too but not sure. My mother-in-law bought what I expect is an nspire (hasn't found it yet ;) for my sis-in-law who never used it, but I bought an 84plus on ebay for the class. (this will be for an algebra class)

  38. Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if we could build an open source calculator that would be compatible with various TI builds. I can imagine even in low quantities you could get the price under $100.

    1. Re:Alternatives? by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Why, if you won't be able to bring it into an exam anyway? Might as well just install a graphing calculator simulator on your laptop instead.

  39. It's the teachers! by louic · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just ask exam questions that require an actual understanding of the subject instead? Oh wait, the teachers don't understand it well enough themselves.

  40. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by taricorp · · Score: 1

    Casio calculators provide some programmability. There's an official SDK for the FX-9750, and unofficial support for writing your own programs on the newest FX-CG is in progress.

    TI's own response to that development was the Nspire CX, which basically adds a color screen to the device without addressing any other complaints.

  41. The Cos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would Bill Cosby say??

    1. Re:The Cos by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      What would Bill Cosby say??

      "Waah! They killed my son. Sob sob."?

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  42. Re:What is "licensing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes sense for software, but for hardware couldn't they simply demand you give it back at the end of the license term? That's what's always happened for me with DSL and cable modems. Once or twice they've told me they were waiving my requirement to return it, making it mine.

  43. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by syousef · · Score: 0

    >You'd know that if you ever held a machete you arrogant ass. But I somehow don't see an image of you walking through the jungle with a machete in one hand and your HP or TI calculator in the other even semi realistic.

    It's called land surveying. Get out of your basement.

    --
    BMO

    How many fucking people do land surveying? How many more do Science, Finance and IT in an office? Your ego trip about doing something outdoors is pathetic. Get a fucking clue.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  44. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by syousef · · Score: 1

    If you think you can toughen a laptop, with a 10+" screen, large keyboard, large LION battery, heatsinks, fans, and all, up to the same standard you can with a 2" by 4" calculator, you are sadly mistaken. Larger more complex devices are by nature harder to ruggedize, especially when the screen gets large enough to be able to flex and break.

    Not to mention ruggedizing it (adding a solid steel frame to the screen, for example) would add quite a bit to the weight and cost, so all of a sudden we're talking about a $1500 laptop weighing 3kg, vs a $100 calculator weighing 250 grams. And for what gain? To use an OS not designed for mathmatics, on a device with 1/50th of the battery life?

    Last time I checked there were specialised laptops for the battlefield, carried by troops.

    No calculator is going to allow you to check or fix mistakes with the ease that even the simplest spreadsheet software will. Punching in long tedious calculations by hand is not something anyone should do in this day and age.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  45. An environment that forbids small laptops by tepples · · Score: 1

    Calling what I listed "a bunch of software that turns a desktop computer into a desktop calculator" is about as asinine as you can get.

    Then I must have misunderstood what you meant by "desktop calculator". You may have meant a four- or five-function. Please allow me to clarify my point: a desktop computer running Maxima or Octave or NumPy is confined to a desk.

    It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get

    Unless you're in an environment that forbids possession of small laptops. Much of TI's market has to spend seven state-mandated hours a day in such an environment. In addition, a dedicated calculator starts the math application within one second of turning the power on, unlike (as I understand it) a laptop computer.

  46. Good point by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    [quote]It is well worth carrying a small laptop instead of a pocket calculator for all the added power you get, unless you're doing simple arithmetic.[/quote] No, it isn't. Unless your level of geekdom is over 9000, that is.

    Absolutely. If I go down to the supermarket I might have to compare unit prices, total cash etc - so a small calculator in my pocket is a good idea. I am unlikely to come across anything needing a laptop's power or find it worth carrying one. At geek levels of 8500 or more you may well not be able to resist trying to optimise the queuing at checkouts or simulate the airflow for optimum placement of air-conditioning outlets, freezers and doorways.

    For that simple arithmetic use the calc on your mobile phone - you're not going to want to carry a TI or HP calc around just to add grocery bills.

    You're right, that's what I do usually. I do take a calculator if I am doing something like buying carpet and tiles and need a lot of calculations, its much more usable than my built-in phone calculator.

    1. Re:Good point by toastar · · Score: 1

      You're right, that's what I do usually. I do take a calculator if I am doing something like buying carpet and tiles and need a lot of calculations, its much more usable than my built-in phone calculator.

      Dude.... how old is your phone? Pretty much every carrier has a free android phone, just download a spreadsheet app.

    2. Re:Good point by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Free*

      *with $100/month for 2 years contract.

  47. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Since when does "How many people do X?" become an argument for "Fuck X."

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  48. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by afidel · · Score: 1

    The TI-89 and TI-92 are essentially embedded Maple with a decent keyboard interface, much faster for most tasks then even a laptop with full Maple installed.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  49. TI's archane policies by mknewman · · Score: 1

    TI totally blew the consumer market. Back in the 80’s it was the gawd awful TI-99/4A computer, horrible hardware and software but totally neutered by TI’s patent protected methods of locking down the software so that it had to be bought through them, so no outside markets developed. Apple is playing the same game today with the IPad and IPhone. Interesting to see that TI, after all these years, still hasn’t gotten the message that when someone buys a computer they want the ability to run programs on it, ANY program they want, not just the ones that the company ‘authorizes’. The very best software has ALWAYS come from hobbyists, doing it in their spare time. Linux came that way, even Apple 1’s were hobbyist hardware and software, directly out of the computer club scene.

    1. Re:TI's archane policies by jbolden · · Score: 1

      TI has been the dominant calculator seller for decades at the higher end. How exactly can you call that "blowing it"?

  50. Ask the professor. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I suppose it depends on the school and the professor, but in every class I've taken so far where I'm allowed to use a calculator on the exams, I've gone out of my way to ask if anyone cares what calculator I use, and no one does, so I've happily kept my HP 50G through all of them.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  51. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by bmo · · Score: 1

    The only troll here is you.

    Where do you get off raging about how calculators and other handhelds are fucking useless and then hopping up and down about how great desktop applications are when people do real work with calculators because a laptop is completely fucking unsuitable for the environment or job?

    Why do I need a fucking laptop in the shop to run a CAD program so I can calculate a dimension a client left off a drawing when I can simply take the calculator and run my COGO program? Or similarly (in my other life) save time by not having to cut down a fucking tree that's in the way?

    Similarly, my cousin Sue is not going to be lugging a fucking laptop through a fucking swamp (she's a biologist) to do data collection. Not gonna fucking happen. She's going to use her HP48 and a fucking notebook and a machete (or sandvik bush axe). Because even a Panasonic Toughbook can't take a tumble down a cliff (the HP will).

    No, fuck you. Take your troll thread and go the fuck home.

    --
    BMO

  52. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm $3000 for a rugidized laptop v.s. carrying a frigging calculator. Different tools for different folks. Personally I think my Voyage 200 is the cat's pajamas. Laptops just aren't small enough and don't carry the battery life for serious unaccompanied work in the field. Now if they could put the TI CAS onto the Kindle 3G, or better yet an early version of Mathemtica, that would be the cat's trousers.

    I also love the fact that we can get into a shouting match over calculators.

    -Color is for fagots. Real men program on black and white screens, while chopping paths through jungles while being chased by cannibals.

  53. Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is TI trying so hard to keep people from hacking their calculators? It's a calculator! It's not like this is some system-critical piece of equipment. It doesn't even hold important user information. It's a freaking calculator!

  54. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by bmo · · Score: 1

    >totally miss point

    The point, sweetie, is that if I'm gonna haul a total station and a couple of wooden tripods (aluminum ones suck for vibration), water for the day, and lunch on my back, I'm not going to increase the weight with a fucking laptop if I don't have to.

    Nobody except the most insane will bring a laptop in the field if it's not required.

    Come at me, bro.

    --
    BMO

  55. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by mlts · · Score: 1

    HP 50g?

  56. TI - what a bunch of douches by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like TI is run by a bunch of ego-maniacal Texan control-freaks with typical ego-maniacal control freak personalities. I mean it's not like a pocket calculator is even that *relevant* anymore. Christ, bc on the unix command line can practically do everything your basic TI can do. For everything else there's your basic run-of-the-mill desktop calculator. Seems like TI should be focusing on how to stay alive, rather than frustrate it's users. I don't understand how they are even in business.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:TI - what a bunch of douches by nzwasp · · Score: 1

      58008

      translation somewhat lost on font :/

    2. Re:TI - what a bunch of douches by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      In a previous life I worked with many ex-TI people who described the company much as you do above. It came across as a place to get a job right out of college, maybe sticking in long enough to take advantage of their generous tuition reimbursement to get an MS, then move on to somewhere more palatable.

  57. Why is TI afraid of their market? by kawabago · · Score: 1

    It makes no sense for a company to be issuing software updates to stop people from playing with hardware they own outright. How can it possibly injure TI if someone plays a homebrew game on a TI calculator? In a troubled economy, how can a company squander resources on hardware they have already sold? This is like a baker who sues you for making toast with his bread! It's absolutely ridiculous! Don't investors look at this say, "TI, what the duck are you doing?"

  58. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by WorBlux · · Score: 1

    No calculator is going to allow you to check or fix mistakes with the ease that even the simplest spreadsheet software will. Punching in long tedious calculations by hand is not something anyone should do in this day and age.

    That;s why calculators let you program in basic. You then just punch in the variables and get an answer. And you can in fact create simple spreadsheets on a TI graphic calc and visualize them by *gasp* graphing. Every graphing calculator has a memory where you call back to see and edit at least the last dozen calculations you did. Learn how the tool actually works before you criticize it. And the battlefield is not the back country. Soldiers carry up to 100 pounds of gear for short periods. If they are carrying a laptop it's because they absolutely need a laptop, not because their too stuck up to carry around a calculator, they would love to lighten their load if they could. A laptop while powerful is simply overkill in many situations. Why use a chainsaw when a pocket-knife will do, especially when you have to carry your tool to the workplace?

  59. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by dr2chase · · Score: 1

    Just FYI, I am pretty sure they make specialized calculators for surveyors, even tougher than HP equipment. A friend of mine worked on them, one of the amusing problems he described was waking the device up from 40 below. (Wake up with a slow clock, figure out the temperature, based on that, slowly boost the clock rate as the batteries warm up from the current draw).

    And though I have never worked as a surveyor, I HAVE been paid to hack through a swamp with a machete, so that my parents would not need to pay the surveyors 5x what they were paying me for the very same work. I would also use an HP calculator for that, which does affirm the usefulness and durability of HP calculators, but doesn't exactly support complaints of "I can't hack my TI calculator".

  60. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by gatzke · · Score: 1

    HP 15C FTW! Best evah.

    Graphing is for pansies. Landscape is where its at!

  61. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

    I'd at Matlab to the list. For a student, it costs less than a TI calculator, and the package you get is worth over $5000 (Matlab + Simulink + toolboxes).

  62. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by dziban303 · · Score: 1

    >all desktop applications

    Yeah, try dragging a PC or even a laptop with you as you swing a machete with 40-50 pounds of gear on your back.

    Or try stuffing a PC into your toolbox.

    Not everyone works behind a desk.

    You're an ivory tower weenie. Shut up.

    -- BMO

    How old are you? 3? How am I suppose to respond to "You're an ivory tower weenie. Shut up.". Schoolyard taunt? Grow the fuck up.

    Last time I checked a hiking backpack and a small laptop were an option for most. You can even get toughened notebooks. You'd know that if you ever held a machete you arrogant ass. But I somehow don't see an image of you walking through the jungle with a machete in one hand and your HP or TI calculator in the other even semi realistic.

    Go troll somewhere else, and make it believable.

    Dude. You just told Bear Grylls to grow the fuck up. Better get your house in order. You are not long for this Erf.

  63. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by dr2chase · · Score: 1

    The OS designed-or-not for mathematics is not compelling. fdlibm, good stuff.

  64. Why this behavior from TI? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    I don't understand TI's behavior. It would seem that an enthusiastic hacker backing would get lots of calculators sold.

    The only possible thing I can think of is that there is no hardware difference between their cheap calculators and their expensive calculators and they don't want that fact exposed.

    Any ideas why TI is doing this? Why is it in their economic interest?

    1. Re:Why this behavior from TI? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the hobbyists behavior.

      At what point will they get a clue that they're not wanted, and go enjoy a better platform?

      Or homebrew their own platform?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Why this behavior from TI? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      The hobbyists are having fun. That's an easy one to answer.

    3. Re:Why this behavior from TI? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that TI's execs are willing to take the risk that alienating *both* members of the basement-dwelling-calculator-hacker community will not lead to their bankruptcy.

  65. Thank you by tepples · · Score: 1

    My "dumb phone" includes a calculator.

    And now that I check, my Audiovox 8610 from Virgin Mobile USA has a four-function calculator too (Menu 8 3). Thank you for the tip. But I guess for a scientific or higher calculator, I'd need to upgrade to a smartphone.

  66. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by anotheryak · · Score: 1

    I cannot believe the CS crowd that still uses TI calculators, or that anyone takes them seriously. Where I went to school, algebraic calculators were for high-school kids and English majors. If you were math, science or engineering, you had an HP and used RPN. Anything else is kids stuff.

  67. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    Ditto ditto on the 48G! You can pry it from my cold dead hands! ... Though I rarely use it ;)

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  68. An open comment to TI calculators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As far as I understand, your main business is selling calculators for use in exams. You want the teachers to know that the calculators haven't been tampered with.

    May I make a recommendation?

    Make an external unit that quickly wipes a calculator's memory and resets the programming to factory default. For teachers that need a standardized calculator, this will be a deep blessing.

    The students can bring home the school's calculators, to get used to them. Before an exam, the calculators can be wiped and re-passed out among students.

  69. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TI calculators are a few hertz, with a few kilobytes of memory, and a black and white screen utilizing terribly low resolution. and these things cost a fortune. By comparison, people have cell phones with color screens, capable of making phone calls, storing far more data, and utilizing far more faster processors for around equivalent prices. While there are apps to turn some cell phones into graphing calculators, are there any graphing calculators out there that actually have a worthy amount of memory, speed, and screen resolution?

    1. Re:Question by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, they're called "netbooks"...

    2. Re:Question by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      You do realize the average smartphone costs $500+ with no contract right?

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Question by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      You do realize you can now buy a low-end Android phone for under $100 with no contract, right?

  70. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Duradin · · Score: 1

    Good luck getting your point across. Some (well, a lot of) people just don't get the "less is more" idea nor that most times a specialized tool will beat a general one.

    If they can't put linux on it it's not a tool basically.

  71. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're missing the best one! Sage, at sagemath.org, is comparable to Mathematica in features and has Python, a real programming language, instead of some toy bullshit.

  72. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Fuck desktop calculators.

    Battery life. I use two calculators (not as much as I did in the field), both HP models. One gets months out of a single set of AAA batteries. The other has had the same little button cell for a couple of years now.

    Visible in sunlight. You can read the simple LCD display in the bright sun. If I'm outside working in the bright sun, a typical laptop is not going to work - even if it had infinite battery life.

    Theft. No one has ever tried to grab my calculator. Laptops have to be watched with a keen eye, even at work.

    I use MATLAB and Excel like crazy at work indoors, and no calculator would approach those tools - but I'm not sure what you have against calculators... they certainly beat the pants off of hauling a laptop and charger around all the time. A lot of people still work outside and on construction sites where lack of power, dirt, water, theft, and other factors make laptops a huge liability.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  73. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by bmo · · Score: 1

    > I am pretty sure they make specialized calculators for surveyors, even tougher than HP equipment

    Not really. There are dedicated data collectors, but look at this:

    http://www.stakemill.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1618
    .
    Basically, it's a 50 with a bunch of software, ruggedizing, 1700 foot bluetooth, and better batteries. It's pretty sweet. The price is eye-watering for joe consumer, but not if you compare to other data collectors.

    I've written my own COGO software since the 80s on various programmable calculators. It's helped with both land surveying and machining (which is why I said toolbox back there). My 48 has been through thick and thin - dropped off rocks, skidded across the shop floor, etc. If I had to replace it, I'd get the 50. My ideal calc would be the 50 with a 48 keypad.

    >not replying to the overall thread about not being able to hack the TI

    I know, it's just that the kid back there got my hackles up.

    TI calcs are pretty much useless to me. Until TI implements RPN and RPL, I'll never buy one.

    >humpin' through a swamp with a machete so you don't have to pay the surveyors to do it.

    If only more people did this.

    "No, I don't wanna pay for a woodcutter"
    "Oh.... oh kay..." (you really want to pay for 3 people to waste their time cutting bull briars (my scars, let me show you them) instead of measuring your property? really?)

    --
    BMO

  74. Why don't they just release 2 versions... by AC-x · · Score: 1

    A specially marked hobbyist version, and a locked down certified exam version? That way people who want to tinker can get the open version, people who need to use it in an exam can use the certified version and TI doesn't have to play cat and mouse trying to prevent people from hacking it.

  75. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by bmo · · Score: 1

    Ignore the "not really" bit up there. I was thinking of something totally different and edited badly.

    --
    BMO

  76. ob xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://xkcd.com/768/

    Why do people still buy TI calculators?

  77. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked there were specialised laptops for the battlefield, carried by troops./quote
    My statements stand, you will NEVER be able to get a laptop weighing several kilos and over a square foot of material, as well as a non-embedded OS, to be as Rugged as a TI-82, which costs around $40 or so on ebay right now (unless your pricetag and materials start to get rather exotic). TI82 needs no cooling, has no moving parts, and has an embedded OS. I am not aware of the OS being able to be permenently disabled with anything other than a hardware failure.

    As for fixing mistakes, I really suspect at this point youve never used a basic graphing calculator. Somehow correcting mistakes was never a problem in high school on the TI-8x line of calculators; they always made it a cinch to work things out.

  78. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, TI has been gouging customers with their calculator prices for years. It's the exact same thing for the same price as it was 10 years ago and further back. If I bought a TI in 01 for $100 then the one that gets bought in 2011 better be ten years ahead in technology for the same price. It's not. So who's surprised that they're gonna start screwing their customers more? I'm not.

  79. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Relying on Windows | Linux graphical drivers et al to be functional-- along with all the other unnecessary-to-math- cruft that comes along with the OS-- in order to do calculations doesnt seem like its less reliable than an embedded single-purpose OS? Or perhaps that it might be slower and clunkier to shoehorn switching between functions in the math program onto the general purpose OS?

  80. Protecting their status by director_mr · · Score: 1

    I would guess they are preventing these changes in their calculators to preserve their status as a preferred calculator at high schools and Colleges. I would speculate they are preventing possible cheating on tests with their locking down of the calculators. Completely understandable as if they aren't the preferred calculators in schools, they lose most of their revenue stream.

  81. Dodged the bullet... by Gibbs-Duhem · · Score: 1

    Wow, I'm glad that my TI-89 from literally 1998 still works perfectly... I use that thing *all* the time at work. I would be furious if I could no longer use the eigenvalue and eigenvector solving software. Did they cripple it in any other ways since then? As is with the stock OS I can solve fairly complex integrals without even simplifying them...

  82. really? trying to stop it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't they be happy people are doing things with their calculators? these things are expensive and way underpowered compared to phones these days. I think they should encourage software development for these things.

  83. They are trying to protect their customers by rabtech · · Score: 1

    Their customers are the schools, standardized testing companies, colleges, etc that still only allow these sorts of calculators (and not smartphones, etc) precisely because they are "locked down" and only support a known set of functions (or can be put in a testing mode that does this).

    If the protection is broken and TI doesn't respond, their real customers will start prohibiting TI calculators and then their market will dry up. After all... who uses one of these outside of high school / college situations? I carry a graphing calculator program on my phone that does everything these calculators can do.

    It seems like adopting a different design would be a win-win for everyone; have test mode firmware that is digitally signed and protected. When certain buttons are held down during a reboot, the hardware physically prevents access to the user-programmable firmware and will only run the test mode firmware. When not in test mode, have zero restrictions on what software can run. I doubt most people using these as small computers will care - they have full access to the hardware and can do what they want with it. Plus the primary "customers" get a locked down test mode that guarantees no tampering.

    Or schools could go another route... order "school" editions of the calculators that have permanently burned firmware in ROM that only supports the features they want. The only way to change the program is to physically swap the ROM chips. Then the school can just provide the calculator and be certain no one is using it to cheat.

    This is all reminiscent of the PS3/OtherOS issue. If Sony had just left well enough alone, there wouldn't be any need to attempt to bypass the security system.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  84. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by dr2chase · · Score: 1

    I think the actual mathematics are pretty much unaffected by all the cruft. I know that experts did the math on the HP calculators (I've met some of those people, I think I worked with some of those people). Experts also did fdlibm, also did gdtoa, and they've been extensively tested. If you go open source, gcc is pretty good on arithmetic (because it is used and tested by many people, including math weenies).

    Interesting thing is, this does not argue for hacking your calculator at all, because "hacking" is at least as bad as "cruft" in terms of introducing unreliability. If you fear the cruft, you should fear the hacking, too. The testing required to get this stuff right is non-intuitive, and I actually am an expert.

  85. TI-55 by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    This will show you my age, but back in the day, I had a TI-55 and every time I went to Kansas City to take an FCC test, they made us remove the batteries and turn it on without the battery, as to make sure we didn't have any short cut formulas pre-programmed. Ah....the "good ole days"....LED display, short battery life, not much functionality. Oh well, it made us THINK a little more I guess. 73's

  86. TI is trying to be like SONY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only people wanting to do things to their calculators, are the only ones willing to put their calculators in any kind of jeopardy by erasing software and whatever. Those not interested, or scared, won't. TI is behaving very much like SONY in this regard. It was stated quite a while ago but I will repeat it here: there might be very smart people working for your company, but you don't have all of them. Its almost certain in fact, that there are more smart people not working for your company, than there are people in your company. People who sell bricks, or shovels, or beer long ago stopped worrying about what people were going to do with their product. TI sells calculators (and chips and whatnot). The calculators have software on them. Software is usually changeable (one of the reasons they call it software, and not hardware). People who are bent on changing it, will change it. They have time, patience, and numbers greater than all of the people who work for TI. Some do it for practical reasons, others do it for sport (the challenge of doing it). In any event, SONY and TI will never be able to stop them. The real question is why they would want to in the first place.

  87. Re:Math environments are hackable hobbyist friendl by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Im referring to the fact that booting up a PC has a remarkably long and complex chain of processes that must execute correctly for you to be able to use it at all-- BIOS functioning, hardware initializing properly, working VGA, working controllers, non-screwed up MBR, non-screwed up bootloader, non-screwed up core system libraries....
    There are scads of things that can and do go wrong with Windows computers. Roughly 50% of my job is essentially helpdesk stuff, where i get to see all the ways that computers malfunction (and only about 1/4 of the time is it user error). The more complicated you make something, the more ways it can fail; PCs may be more capable than that calculator, but theyre also orders of magnitude less reliable (esp if theyre using rotational media).

    How many times have you gone to turn on a TI or HP calculator and had it spit out "Please insert System Disk" or beep several times at you and fail to power on?

  88. gah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they are doing the same with the ti-84, although on a lesser scale. with the ti-84 they are making the crummiest OSs you would think a 8-year-old wrote it >.>

  89. Programmable Slide Rules.... by sl149q · · Score: 1

    Its time to go back to when men were men and engineers used slide rules....

    Pretty much impossible to hack and re-program.

  90. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP's newest offerings are the 20b and 30b financial calculators. When you open the battery door on those calculators, you'll find a JTAG connector that allows you to rewrite the whole calculator firmware. Its use is documented and encouraged, and on the Museum of HP Calculators forum, there are HP insiders showing how it's done.

    Right now, some dedicated hackers are working on a new firmware for the 30b that will make it into a very powerful programmable scientific calculator. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/wp34s/ . It's very usable already, and I am looking forward to the finished version. Visit the aforementioned forum for more information: http://www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/hpmuseum/forum.cgi .

  91. Re:Which calculator is powerful and Hobbyist frien by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

    I don't carry mine around any more as I don't really have the need, but I do use the Droid 48 emulator for my Android phone. Runs the original roms (that HP have released, kudos to them). Ah, the memories, and having a proper calculator on your phone that you can trust to boot. Recommended.

    --
    Stefan Axelsson
  92. Why do they care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious Question: Why the hell do they even care if people use those things for whatever they want? With Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo I get it, but... calculators?