I have no idea what the mentioned 'master key' is supposed to be.
AFAIK the actual exploit is using duplicate filenames which aren't checked against hashes upon installation of apk...
Blackadder: Baldrick, I have a very, very, very cunning plan.
Baldrick: Is it as cunning as a fox what used to be Professor of Cunning at Oxford University but has moved on, and is now working for the UN at the High Commission of International Cunning Planning?
Blackadder: Yes, it is.
If intention was to keep those web sites alive they'd better also obtain applications and databases. The way as I understand this is being done it will be just another archive.
With Firefox 3.6.10 on win 7:
- visited evercookie page
- Tools -> clear recent history
- close browser
- run ccleaner
- visited evercookie page again and got new cookie ID
I'd say it is not as persistent as it says...
Hi.
SecurID tokencode is calculated from current time + seed fed to the (AES) crypto algorithm. I believe that without knowing the seed it is quite hard to predict next tokencode...
10. Why the fsck would you want to ping 2001:0db8:85a3::8a2e:0370:7334 when you have that DNS thingie?
9. As *most* of organizations migrate to IPv6, IPv4 universe is gonna be a lonely place
8. Ok, let me get this... Simpler (no header chksum, no fragmentation on router), fixed length headers need more processing power on router? Try again.
7. As already said in previous post... you're gonna have a hard time re-training your entire IT staff when you migrate from Win95
6. What? Your network hardware is more than 10 years old? BTW many vendors started IPv6 support in late 90's (previous century)
5. Sure. Especially in case of monkeys with typewriters.
4. Even if that was true the remaining 5% is worth the move.
3. I'm sure telcos will find other sources of revenue, don't you?
2. Nothing prevents those organizations from using IPv4 or IPX or whatever in their internal networks.
1. It *is* broken. I've got one word for you - NAT.
You've been obviously sleeping for quite some years now. I think you're gonna wake up in desert.;)
10. Why the fsck would you want to ping 2001:0db8:85a3::8a2e:0370:7334 when you have that DNS thingie?
9. As *most* of organizations migrate to IPv6, IPv4 universe is gonna be a lonely place
8. Ok, let me get this... Simpler (no header chksum, no fragmentation on router), fixed length headers need more processing power on router? Try again.
7. As already said in previous post... you're gonna have a hard time re-training your entire IT staff when you migrate from Win95
6. What? Your network hardware is more than 10 years old? BTW many vendors started IPv6 support in late 90's (previous century)
5. Sure. Especially in case of monkeys with typewriters.
4. Even if that was true the remaining 5% is worth the move.
3. I'm sure telcos will find other sources of revenue, don't you?
2. Nothing prevents those organizations from using IPv4 or IPX or whatever in their internal networks.
1. It *is* broken. I've got one word for you - NAT.
You've been obviously sleeping for quite some years now. I think you're gonna wake up in dessert.;)
You can always use fc00::/7 (Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses) addresses in your IPv6 network.
From RFC 4193:...defines an IPv6 unicast address format that is globally
unique and is intended for local communications, usually inside of a
site. These addresses are not expected to be routable on the global
Internet.
Slashdot Mirror
I have no idea what the mentioned 'master key' is supposed to be.
AFAIK the actual exploit is using duplicate filenames which aren't checked against hashes upon installation of apk...
Wait until a *sandworm* comes along! :)
Where are my mod points when i need them? :P
Even if we don't bring out the Betteridge's Law of Headlines ...
With current candidates I'd say - no.
Blackadder: Baldrick, I have a very, very, very cunning plan.
Baldrick: Is it as cunning as a fox what used to be Professor of Cunning at Oxford University but has moved on, and is now working for the UN at the High Commission of International Cunning Planning?
Blackadder: Yes, it is.
Sorry. I couldn't help myself.
If intention was to keep those web sites alive they'd better also obtain applications and databases. The way as I understand this is being done it will be just another archive.
...People for the Eating Tasty Animals (PETA).... There, I fixed that for me....
...People for the Eatig Tasty Animals (PETA)....
There, I fixed that for you....
Why would I even want to watch TV?
True. I noticed that to but I hit Submit first. :P
With Firefox 3.6.10 on win 7: - visited evercookie page - Tools -> clear recent history - close browser - run ccleaner - visited evercookie page again and got new cookie ID I'd say it is not as persistent as it says...
That happened a while ago in Slovenia.
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iprom.si%2Fnews%2F2086%2F25%2FBrskalnika-Internet-Explorer-in-Firefox-po-priljubljenosti-izenacena.html&sl=sl&tl=en
What this country needs is a good $5 plasma weapon.
Hi. SecurID tokencode is calculated from current time + seed fed to the (AES) crypto algorithm. I believe that without knowing the seed it is quite hard to predict next tokencode...
Shoot him.
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/google_opt_out_feature_lets_users
10. Why the fsck would you want to ping 2001:0db8:85a3::8a2e:0370:7334 when you have that DNS thingie? 9. As *most* of organizations migrate to IPv6, IPv4 universe is gonna be a lonely place 8. Ok, let me get this... Simpler (no header chksum, no fragmentation on router), fixed length headers need more processing power on router? Try again.
;)
7. As already said in previous post... you're gonna have a hard time re-training your entire IT staff when you migrate from Win95
6. What? Your network hardware is more than 10 years old? BTW many vendors started IPv6 support in late 90's (previous century)
5. Sure. Especially in case of monkeys with typewriters.
4. Even if that was true the remaining 5% is worth the move.
3. I'm sure telcos will find other sources of revenue, don't you?
2. Nothing prevents those organizations from using IPv4 or IPX or whatever in their internal networks.
1. It *is* broken. I've got one word for you - NAT.
You've been obviously sleeping for quite some years now. I think you're gonna wake up in desert.
10. Why the fsck would you want to ping 2001:0db8:85a3::8a2e:0370:7334 when you have that DNS thingie? 9. As *most* of organizations migrate to IPv6, IPv4 universe is gonna be a lonely place 8. Ok, let me get this... Simpler (no header chksum, no fragmentation on router), fixed length headers need more processing power on router? Try again. 7. As already said in previous post... you're gonna have a hard time re-training your entire IT staff when you migrate from Win95 6. What? Your network hardware is more than 10 years old? BTW many vendors started IPv6 support in late 90's (previous century) 5. Sure. Especially in case of monkeys with typewriters. 4. Even if that was true the remaining 5% is worth the move. 3. I'm sure telcos will find other sources of revenue, don't you? 2. Nothing prevents those organizations from using IPv4 or IPX or whatever in their internal networks. 1. It *is* broken. I've got one word for you - NAT. You've been obviously sleeping for quite some years now. I think you're gonna wake up in dessert. ;)
You can always use fc00::/7 (Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses) addresses in your IPv6 network. From RFC 4193: ...defines an IPv6 unicast address format that is globally
unique and is intended for local communications, usually inside of a
site. These addresses are not expected to be routable on the global
Internet.
[snip] only idiots commit crimes in front of cameras.Obviously, another question is how many crimes simply moved to areas without cameras.
How about... If I'm going to commit a crime in the area covered by cameras I'll just wear a baseball cap
Well... Why wouldn't Wikipedia adopt slashdot-like moderation system? Could do good if implemented properly.
!pr0n? Obligatory tag on 90% of slashdot posts.
I don't have too many good things to say about RSA but they actually do have challenge-response capable tokens. http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1311
The OTP on RSA tokens are still valid only for a period of time - usually current time +-1 minute.
And you definately don't need much delicacy to make a torturebot, so what here is really terrifying?
Actually I think it requires quite a bit more of delicacy to make a torturebot than a killbot...