Really? I moved from a MacBook Pro to a T430S a couple of years ago, and I really like it. The trackpad isn't as good as the MBP, but it's pretty damn usable... I don't have any issues using it at all.
Not running M$ bloat OS tho, maybe that's why? Does Linux have a better trackpad driver than M$? And I still have the eraser mouse if needed.
I am extremely happy with the Lenovo and recommend it any time someone asks. I can get the proc I want, the amount of memory I want, and it's still reasonably priced (in my case, an I7 and 16g). When I got it the only other company that could match the specs I wanted was Alien, at twice the price and weight, and a 17" screen.
I was a little worried moving from a metal case (on the MBP) to a plastic case, but it has survived very well and the body is still very stiff with the metal (magnesium?) inner skeleton. No issues at all. And, I believe that the Fn key was swapped with the Ctrl key to make it easier to find in the dark, to turn on the backlighting... I know, kinda lame, how hard is it to find the SECOND button from the left in the dark, but I do appreciate it at those times.
And Lenovo's support is EXTREMELY good, the one time I needed it. Getting anything back the day after you send it in is unheard of in my neck of the woods... Normally the shippers aren't that good here.
Honestly, I prefer the Slashdot method: community voting based on popular perception.
Contrast that with site regulation, where a certain group of moderators determine the content of the "acceptable" posts: for instance, any anti-gun facebook group. The problem with this type of moderation is it completely destroys discussion, arguement, and discourse in favor of preening and ego stroking. There is no way to correct misinformation, or to have a meaningful debate about the subject at hand.
I am not in any way promoting extreme trolling (such as the example of posting rape porn on a rape victim support site), and I think any rational person would be able to easily pick out this type of abuse and would agree that it is not acceptable. But the act of disagreeing and stating an opposite viewpoint or opinion about a topic is *not* trolling, though it's called that on many, many discussion boards. And that is what I am against: the PC version of troll blasting, where it interferes with honest and even sometimes heated debate. The best that I have seen is the Slashdot type of voting, along with a point of no return, where there are so many negative votes that the comment is hidden but still available to the reader to view and decide on his/her own whether the post was properly modded down.
I'm less fine with government curtailing freedom of expression, regardless of how offensive it may be.
Totally agree. This should be done "For the People, By the People", not "For the People, By the Gubment". The Gov should NOT be in the business of censorship, and in the US that falls under the 1st Amendment. Even the whole child porn illegality to me feels like a slippery slope (even though, morally, I fully support the arrest, conviction, and forced rape by an angry silverback for those who produce that shit), because it could lead to other censorship based on precedence and someone's personal, moral judgement (just like me and the child porn example). I think there's a line that shouldn't be crossed, but the arguement always is, "Who determines the line?" It's always a good arguement to have, and I hope that type of arguement always continues to be had.
To be fair, though, a sentence is MUCH better than your dog's name or your birthdate... So, don't totally discount it as insecure. It's much more secure than my examples, simply because of the number of characters and punctuation involved.
I do like your interactive experience idea... A nice, big database of answers to pre-asked questions, chosen randomly during each "experience", so they aren't duplicated in an order. Not questions based on facts that are retrievable, like your mothers maiden name, your first car, or your 5th grade teacher, but questions based on an opinion or something. Good idea.
I have to completely agree with this. I've been using LastPass for the last 6 months, and it has totally changed the way I use passwords. Now, every password I have is a long, random generated string of characters, but I only need to remember one, very long and easy to remember password to access all of them. And since it's device and OS agnostic, it works everywhere. It's saved my ass a couple of times already.
It doesn't matter (to me) what manager you use, just use one. It completely changes the way you treat passwords.
If you kill off... I mean, the poor and minorities die out or leave, who's gonna:
-Mow your lawn
-Clean your pool
-Cook your food
-Clean your house
-Make your Big Macs (or Whopper, or whatever your fast-food kick is)
-Wash your car
-Make your coffee
-Clean your car windows (at traffic lights)
and all the other menial chores that are below your station? Gotta think about the possible future negative impacts and keep a few around, even though it's distasteful...
It's not ethical to shoot someone who is drunk and yelling at you.
FTFY. There's no "probably" about this. The drunk yelling at you has not escalated the encounter to the point where you need to defend your life or anyone else's. You don't have the right to shoot someone unless there's a life in danger, and don't think there won't be repurcussions even if it was completely self-defense. There will be a court appearance if you shoot someone.
Just because you can do unethical things with a tool doesn't necessarily mean you should get rid of the tool.
That's what I thought at first as well, but then I realized it doesn't have to do with the OS but the hardware itself, which is what IOS vs Android is.
So, even though Android has 52% of the OS market share, it has that share based on many, many different models of phones by many manufacturers. Whereas the 41% that Apple has (funny, 41% of OS market share *and* 41% of hardware market share) is spread out among three or four models *total*, all made by Apple. The test had to do with hardware and battery longevity, not necessarily OS issues, though OS issues can indeed contribute, which makes my arguement even more pertinent.
So Anubis does have a good point, and it would have been a more stable test than the one that was done.
OK, got it. That makes sense in that light and I get what you are saying. But, I blame both in my mind, and lay a larger weight on the Gov't's shoulders, as they are using OUR money to screw around with. There should be huge repurcussions for the private sector company who screwed up while earning public dollars.
You know what I mean?
They don't like spending money *over and over again*. That's how Sony and M$ should use this case. Tie the fuckers (AARC) up in court for so long they go outta business. Bury them. Then let all the other trollers know they aren't afraid of doing it again if they are threatened.
You'd never see that if Mobile did a new middleware upgrade that wasted $300M and never worked.
And the issue here isn't Lockheed Martin's incompetence in delivering the contract, but the Government's in poorly managing a vendor.
The hypocrisy is that the government is always blamed.
You had me until that last line... Let's recap: the Gov't is poorly managing it's vendor(s), but it's hypocritical to blame them for it?
Nobody should ever be logging in as root remotely. That's what sudo is for.
Servers are infected through the execution of a hypertext preprocessor (PHP) script that establishes Mayhem on the victim computer and sets up a communications channel with a command and control server.
Bullshit. I work for a telco that is doing exactly that in an extremely rural population, and other rural telcos in our region are already 100% done with their deployments. To all their customers! Wireless is a joke for professional WAN use (ISP, telco, cellular backhaul, etc.) no matter what the US cellular industry says. Upkeep is minimal compared to antenna systems and power requirements for those installations.
Curious why you posted your crap AC, if you truly belive what you say and aren't just a troll.
Is the real, raw data even available to the public? From any type of research? I don't know, I am genuinely curious... I thought a lot of that was proprietary info and not generally available.
And my cynical, paranoid side agrees with your fear, especially with GCC data: that it's been "cleaned". "Trust us! We're the professionals!"
You are perfectly right... I will not do my own analysis, and that is truly because I am not qualified. I fully admit that. However, I also do not believe that those who are doing it are qualified either, based on the horrible data that they are espousing.
There are very many proven cases of improper baseline issues, poorly collected data, actual changing of raw data, and use of data without adjusting for local environmental changes. This is known but ignored (and even worse, denied) by pro-GCC pundits. It is simply a huge money pit, and there are those who are profiting heavily in both the scientific community and the money-providing foundations. It's all about money. Everything is about money.
Oh, and there is no mud slinging here... As I stated in my previous post, it's bullshit that's being slung.
Climate is not weather but the statistical analysis of weather.
And right there is where the bullshit starts gettin' slung. In the right hands, a good statistician can prove anything with statistics. Which is why you see, so often, GCC graphs that have arbitrary X and Y axis bases, making the change much more marked than in reality.
Which then makes those charts suspect, which throws suspicion not only on the particular researcher who is giving out flawed interpretations, but also on the entire idea of climate change. Meaning, bullshit.
EVERYONE also believed in eugenics, in the beginning of the 20th century. It was a scientifically proven concept, that EVERYONE could see the value of. Those who didn't were called crackpots and ostriches. Don't give me the BS about how EVERYONE agrees about GCC. It's a really good money maker right now, and is happily filling lots of scientific coffers. Everything in this world is based on money, and it's financially profitable to PROVE aspects of GCC right now. So, therefore, it's all suspect.
I have copyrighted the term "gorilla computing". Your "geurilla computing" is much too close auditorily to my copyrighted term that I forbid you to use it in any commercial or non-commercial way, without paying me for the use of it of course. Anything for a dollar, or any other recognized form of payment, including but not limited to bitcoin, Galactic Credit Standard and gold-pressed latinum.
My Mother in law cost over 600 thousand dollars the las two years of her life.
...I've visited a number of nursing homes, where people are racking up astounding amounts of money in medicare.
And this practice is what keeps the economy running and why the nanny state is flourishing, getting rid of all those bad things. Your mother was a bad influence on the economy, because she did harmful things to her body and then expired in a blaze of glory. But did not help the economy as much as your mother-in-law. I am sure your mother did not spend 600 grand in smokes and booze in her last two years.
Remember, it's all about the Benjamins. Everything is about the Benjamins. Everything. Including health care, scientific research, everything. I know that's a cynical view, but if you don't believe it, you should work at your job for free for the next year.
Slashdot Mirror
Ahh... Cultural and language barrier crash... :)
LOL... GLUEons! I see what you did there.
Germany -- where the best meat wurst.
FTFY.
Really? I moved from a MacBook Pro to a T430S a couple of years ago, and I really like it. The trackpad isn't as good as the MBP, but it's pretty damn usable... I don't have any issues using it at all.
Not running M$ bloat OS tho, maybe that's why? Does Linux have a better trackpad driver than M$? And I still have the eraser mouse if needed.
I am extremely happy with the Lenovo and recommend it any time someone asks. I can get the proc I want, the amount of memory I want, and it's still reasonably priced (in my case, an I7 and 16g). When I got it the only other company that could match the specs I wanted was Alien, at twice the price and weight, and a 17" screen.
I was a little worried moving from a metal case (on the MBP) to a plastic case, but it has survived very well and the body is still very stiff with the metal (magnesium?) inner skeleton. No issues at all. And, I believe that the Fn key was swapped with the Ctrl key to make it easier to find in the dark, to turn on the backlighting... I know, kinda lame, how hard is it to find the SECOND button from the left in the dark, but I do appreciate it at those times.
And Lenovo's support is EXTREMELY good, the one time I needed it. Getting anything back the day after you send it in is unheard of in my neck of the woods... Normally the shippers aren't that good here.
I'm fine with sites regulating trolls.
Honestly, I prefer the Slashdot method: community voting based on popular perception.
Contrast that with site regulation, where a certain group of moderators determine the content of the "acceptable" posts: for instance, any anti-gun facebook group. The problem with this type of moderation is it completely destroys discussion, arguement, and discourse in favor of preening and ego stroking. There is no way to correct misinformation, or to have a meaningful debate about the subject at hand.
I am not in any way promoting extreme trolling (such as the example of posting rape porn on a rape victim support site), and I think any rational person would be able to easily pick out this type of abuse and would agree that it is not acceptable. But the act of disagreeing and stating an opposite viewpoint or opinion about a topic is *not* trolling, though it's called that on many, many discussion boards. And that is what I am against: the PC version of troll blasting, where it interferes with honest and even sometimes heated debate. The best that I have seen is the Slashdot type of voting, along with a point of no return, where there are so many negative votes that the comment is hidden but still available to the reader to view and decide on his/her own whether the post was properly modded down.
I'm less fine with government curtailing freedom of expression, regardless of how offensive it may be.
Totally agree. This should be done "For the People, By the People", not "For the People, By the Gubment". The Gov should NOT be in the business of censorship, and in the US that falls under the 1st Amendment. Even the whole child porn illegality to me feels like a slippery slope (even though, morally, I fully support the arrest, conviction, and forced rape by an angry silverback for those who produce that shit), because it could lead to other censorship based on precedence and someone's personal, moral judgement (just like me and the child porn example). I think there's a line that shouldn't be crossed, but the arguement always is, "Who determines the line?" It's always a good arguement to have, and I hope that type of arguement always continues to be had.
To be fair, though, a sentence is MUCH better than your dog's name or your birthdate... So, don't totally discount it as insecure. It's much more secure than my examples, simply because of the number of characters and punctuation involved.
I do like your interactive experience idea... A nice, big database of answers to pre-asked questions, chosen randomly during each "experience", so they aren't duplicated in an order. Not questions based on facts that are retrievable, like your mothers maiden name, your first car, or your 5th grade teacher, but questions based on an opinion or something. Good idea.
I have to completely agree with this. I've been using LastPass for the last 6 months, and it has totally changed the way I use passwords. Now, every password I have is a long, random generated string of characters, but I only need to remember one, very long and easy to remember password to access all of them. And since it's device and OS agnostic, it works everywhere. It's saved my ass a couple of times already.
It doesn't matter (to me) what manager you use, just use one. It completely changes the way you treat passwords.
If you kill off... I mean, the poor and minorities die out or leave, who's gonna: -Mow your lawn -Clean your pool -Cook your food -Clean your house -Make your Big Macs (or Whopper, or whatever your fast-food kick is) -Wash your car -Make your coffee -Clean your car windows (at traffic lights) and all the other menial chores that are below your station? Gotta think about the possible future negative impacts and keep a few around, even though it's distasteful...
Well done.
It's not ethical to shoot someone who is drunk and yelling at you.
FTFY. There's no "probably" about this. The drunk yelling at you has not escalated the encounter to the point where you need to defend your life or anyone else's. You don't have the right to shoot someone unless there's a life in danger, and don't think there won't be repurcussions even if it was completely self-defense. There will be a court appearance if you shoot someone.
Just because you can do unethical things with a tool doesn't necessarily mean you should get rid of the tool.
Fully agree with this.
That's what I thought at first as well, but then I realized it doesn't have to do with the OS but the hardware itself, which is what IOS vs Android is.
So, even though Android has 52% of the OS market share, it has that share based on many, many different models of phones by many manufacturers. Whereas the 41% that Apple has (funny, 41% of OS market share *and* 41% of hardware market share) is spread out among three or four models *total*, all made by Apple. The test had to do with hardware and battery longevity, not necessarily OS issues, though OS issues can indeed contribute, which makes my arguement even more pertinent.
So Anubis does have a good point, and it would have been a more stable test than the one that was done.
OK, got it. That makes sense in that light and I get what you are saying. But, I blame both in my mind, and lay a larger weight on the Gov't's shoulders, as they are using OUR money to screw around with. There should be huge repurcussions for the private sector company who screwed up while earning public dollars. You know what I mean?
They don't like spending money *over and over again*. That's how Sony and M$ should use this case. Tie the fuckers (AARC) up in court for so long they go outta business. Bury them. Then let all the other trollers know they aren't afraid of doing it again if they are threatened.
You'd never see that if Mobile did a new middleware upgrade that wasted $300M and never worked. And the issue here isn't Lockheed Martin's incompetence in delivering the contract, but the Government's in poorly managing a vendor. The hypocrisy is that the government is always blamed.
You had me until that last line... Let's recap: the Gov't is poorly managing it's vendor(s), but it's hypocritical to blame them for it?
What?
Nobody should ever be logging in as root remotely. That's what sudo is for.
Servers are infected through the execution of a hypertext preprocessor (PHP) script that establishes Mayhem on the victim computer and sets up a communications channel with a command and control server.
...it doesn't need root to operate.
RTFA, AC dumbass troll.
Agreed the FCC and it's greed for more licensing fees has pretty much killed OTA...
FTFY
Bullshit. I work for a telco that is doing exactly that in an extremely rural population, and other rural telcos in our region are already 100% done with their deployments. To all their customers! Wireless is a joke for professional WAN use (ISP, telco, cellular backhaul, etc.) no matter what the US cellular industry says. Upkeep is minimal compared to antenna systems and power requirements for those installations. Curious why you posted your crap AC, if you truly belive what you say and aren't just a troll.
Is the real, raw data even available to the public? From any type of research? I don't know, I am genuinely curious... I thought a lot of that was proprietary info and not generally available.
And my cynical, paranoid side agrees with your fear, especially with GCC data: that it's been "cleaned". "Trust us! We're the professionals!"
You are perfectly right... I will not do my own analysis, and that is truly because I am not qualified. I fully admit that. However, I also do not believe that those who are doing it are qualified either, based on the horrible data that they are espousing.
There are very many proven cases of improper baseline issues, poorly collected data, actual changing of raw data, and use of data without adjusting for local environmental changes. This is known but ignored (and even worse, denied) by pro-GCC pundits. It is simply a huge money pit, and there are those who are profiting heavily in both the scientific community and the money-providing foundations. It's all about money. Everything is about money.
Oh, and there is no mud slinging here... As I stated in my previous post, it's bullshit that's being slung.
Climate is not weather but the statistical analysis of weather.
And right there is where the bullshit starts gettin' slung. In the right hands, a good statistician can prove anything with statistics. Which is why you see, so often, GCC graphs that have arbitrary X and Y axis bases, making the change much more marked than in reality.
Which then makes those charts suspect, which throws suspicion not only on the particular researcher who is giving out flawed interpretations, but also on the entire idea of climate change. Meaning, bullshit.
EVERYONE also believed in eugenics, in the beginning of the 20th century. It was a scientifically proven concept, that EVERYONE could see the value of. Those who didn't were called crackpots and ostriches. Don't give me the BS about how EVERYONE agrees about GCC. It's a really good money maker right now, and is happily filling lots of scientific coffers. Everything in this world is based on money, and it's financially profitable to PROVE aspects of GCC right now. So, therefore, it's all suspect.
Amen.
I have copyrighted the term "gorilla computing". Your "geurilla computing" is much too close auditorily to my copyrighted term that I forbid you to use it in any commercial or non-commercial way, without paying me for the use of it of course. Anything for a dollar, or any other recognized form of payment, including but not limited to bitcoin, Galactic Credit Standard and gold-pressed latinum.
Learn that food stamps are a temporary fix and not make them a permanent fixture in your life.
You do not have to make laws to change society. You just need to change the people.
Well said.
My Mother in law cost over 600 thousand dollars the las two years of her life.
And this practice is what keeps the economy running and why the nanny state is flourishing, getting rid of all those bad things. Your mother was a bad influence on the economy, because she did harmful things to her body and then expired in a blaze of glory. But did not help the economy as much as your mother-in-law. I am sure your mother did not spend 600 grand in smokes and booze in her last two years.
Remember, it's all about the Benjamins. Everything is about the Benjamins. Everything. Including health care, scientific research, everything. I know that's a cynical view, but if you don't believe it, you should work at your job for free for the next year.
LOL... Nice and concise. Well put.