Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Customer Service Rep Just Won't Take No For an Answer

RevWaldo writes: The Verge and other sources report on how AOL's Ryan Block ultimately succeeded in cancelling his Comcast account over the phone, but not before the customer service representative pressed him for eight solid minutes (audio) to explain his reasoning for leaving "the number one provider of TV and internet service in the country" in a manner that would cause a character in Glengarry Glen Ross to blush. Comcast has now issued an apology.

401 comments

  1. We're sorry we got caught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's probably what they meant...

    1. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      yeah, and claiming that isn't how they train their representatives doesn't make sense either, as i've gone through that exact same conversion with comcast multiple times as i moved around the country in and out of their territory.

      comcast is evil... the call center representatives are ignorant megalomaniacs.

      the internet is not worth dealing with them.

    2. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by JMJimmy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pretty much.

      Here's the actual link to the apology instead of a random blog. http://corporate.comcast.com/c...

    3. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. PR apologies are nice, but they don't really mean anything unless the business changes how they operate, and that's not going to happen.

    4. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, the irony that someone from AOL had trouble cancelling service. Karma's a B****.

    5. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well since a company cannot feel the emotion of grief, what they really mean is that by saying this they think they can make slightly more money than if they said something else or nothing at all.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in what the hold time for the customer retention department versus technical support. You can be pretty sure 8 minutes is a lot more than the tech support is allotted per customer to make their quotas.

    7. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      "The way in which our representative communicated with them is unacceptable..."

      True.

      "The way in which our representative communicated with them is unacceptable and not consistent with how we train our customer service representatives."

      Cough cough BULLSHIT cough cough

    8. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by sd4f · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure if it's identical around the world, but certainly here in Australia, many of these customer service people have their performance measured by how many people they convince to stay or attract. So while they might not be trained to be aggressive or like dogs with a bone (i.e. just don't let go), and companies like comcast can ignorantly claim what they did, for every worker, the reality is there's that KPI looking over their shoulder and they'll go to those lengths themselves to either not get sacked or make bonus.

      A worse thing that happens in Australia, and it particularly happens with insurance companies is that they usually hit renewing customers with higher fees. It sometimes gets referred to as the 'lazy tax' where most customers will just habitually accept and pay it, whereas if they shopped around, and called back, they would usually get a fair chunk knocked off their bill for literally no reason except that the company wants the customer to stay. They know that in doing it this way, they make more money because a big enough proportion of people don't question the bill, and those that do, it's better to get them to pay less than not at all. I know that your ISP's and cable companies are notrious for treating their customers like shit (south park covered it well).

    9. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by drcagn · · Score: 1

      I agree with this and it's probably why he kept suggesting for him to go to the Comcast store in person to cancel instead of canceling over the phone. Canceling over the phone would mean he lost a customer, getting him to go to the store in person wouldn't count as a cancellation on his numbers.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    10. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by bangular · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Comcast makes it seem like this was a rogue employee. He's not. In fact, I don't even blame him for what he did. His directions most likely came from the top. "Don't let a customer go for any reason." Then, when he follows those directions, they play dumb and claim "we would never have a service rep do this."

      From the sound of the call, it sounds like he was following his training to the "t." He kept his cool. Kept reminding the customer of their market standing as #1. Suggested he could give them a better price. Never took no for an answer.

      Besides training people to do this, most of the time they economically incentivise this behavior as well. I doubt he's paid much over minimum wage and any pay that would bring him to a living wage is tied to bonuses for not losing customers. If he loses enough customers I'm sure he'll lose his job.

      Bottom line, he's trained and paid to do this from some corporate drones with pay scales far outside of his. What we really need to do is call out the corporate drones that make their reps play hardball to keep their jobs.

    11. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by weszz · · Score: 1

      They do... With all the cable companies now you get the base rate, then you get promotions that expire... (i just went through this with Uverse)

      so promos expire and you call in, the first person offers to take something like $30 off the bill a month for 6 months or a year. you say no and talk to retention, tell them you are looking at time warner, comcast or whoever because $200 a month is ridiculous for internet and cable, and then they knock $70-80 off with a year contract, and in a year you do it again. If you don't like to press the issue, work during the time that retention is open, or for whatever reason don't call, they bend you over every month.

    12. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by weszz · · Score: 1

      I also did tech support for Real Networks back in the day (dirty dirty company) and the way they ran cancellations wasn't much better. for every "Save" you got you earned an extra dollar. being in tech support we didn't fall into that pay scheme, but we felt it.

      It went something like this, you go online to cancel the subscription you didn't know you agreed to, unless you said you have windows 95, it said you had to call in.

      you call in and the person offers free tech support, a few months free etc... then eventually they get to well, how about i give you 3 months free and send you an email. if at any point you decide that you want to cancel, just reply to the email and we will cancel it, but i can only do that if you agree to the email. Thinking you are getting 3 months and canceling anyway, you agree, they get their dollar, you then have to watch for the email to cancel.

      it isn't easy...

    13. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the new spate of commercials? Where they're promoting customer satisfaction "guarantee?" I made the mistake last year of trying to save money by dropping satellite TV and going with Comcast, since I already got internet through them. It was a f#!king nightmare. I did have the forethought to set a cancel date for satellite far enough in the future (several weeks) to ensure some overlap... and was able to cancel the cancellation in time. For two missed appointments, hours on hold (unceremoniously being dropped after waiting 90 minutes at one point), and a multitude of unkept promises... for my "gaurantee" I got $20 credit.

      I bend over and keep getting comcast for internet because there's no viable alternative where I am... nothing fast enough to allow me to work from home, but I won't give them the chance again for anything else, and I'm biding my time for when I can dump them entirely.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    14. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      If so, perhaps they their script from when I quit Comcast. I quit because they couldn't or wouldn't fix a very unreliable connection; don't get me wrong, the service sucked. But canceling it took a few minutes; they asked me why, and I told them, and that was it. They didn't try really hard to retain me.

      Perhaps the frequent complaints I'd made popped up a box saying "Customer is a pain in the butt, let them go" or "Customer is at the end of a long last mile with outdated equipment, and it would cost more to fix their problem than we'd make in payments, so give it up." Or maybe it was just my very definite answer about why I was canceling. But it didn't take me very long and I got no real pushback on it.

    15. Re:We're sorry we got caught? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Corporations can do emotions now. At least I assume so; since they can be religious, I assume they can at least do guilt, shame, and self-righteousness.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by fang0654 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is this, backwards day?

    1. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ryan recently joined AOL when they purchased GDGT, although I am pretty sure he appreciates the irony of an AOL VP complaining about not being able to easily cancel service, as a VP he probably can't express that in public...

    2. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      Indeed, this is really hilarious that an AOL guy has trouble discontinuing service with a provider... I'm betting that AOL was much tougher than Comcast back in the day

      --
      Have a Day!
    3. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by IronOxen · · Score: 1

      AOL was easy to cancel service back in the day but they financed their build out with interest free loans ( and shall we call them grants?) obtained by "forgetting" to stop charging your credit card for a few more months.

    4. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish everyone using the expression, "back in the day" would fall into a volcano. I find it really idiotic when you young guys say that.

    5. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      How old does one have to be to use the phrase? Back in the day, one had to be talking about the Great War, or prohibition to use the expression. But since the dawn of internet time, when discussing "back in the day," I take it to mean about 20 years ago.

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    6. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by owski · · Score: 1

      Back in the day we used to wish they would get run over by a bus, you young whippersnappers are pretty retro.

    7. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      In the before times, in the long-long-ago? heh. "back in the days of dialup" (in the voice of the narrator for TA -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J...)

    8. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish everyone using the expression, "back in the day" would fall into a volcano. I find it really idiotic when you young guys say that.

      I know right? Back in the day we used to say "four score and seven years ago".

    9. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ryan recently joined AOL when they purchased GDGT, although I am pretty sure he appreciates the irony of an AOL VP complaining about not being able to easily cancel service, as a VP he probably can't express that in public...

      Well of course not. We claim free speech is an inalienable human right and all of that fluffy talk, but it's okay for it to be censored on a routine basis as long as it's not the government doing it. I mean this is a CORPORATION we're talking about here. Surely that's more important than truth or honest opinions!

    10. Re:From AOL having trouble cancelling service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ryan recently joined AOL when they purchased GDGT, although I am pretty sure he appreciates the irony of an AOL VP complaining about not being able to easily cancel service, as a VP he probably can't express that in public...

      ... or maybe he can.

  4. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... companies don't want you to stop sending them money? Who woulda thunk!

    1. Re:So... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I would have just said "Look, you know that I want to terminate my contract, so if you keep going this way, I'm gonna end this discussion and just not pay your company's bills anymore. Is that really the way you want this to go, or can we do this properly?".

    2. Re:So... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sadly, then the company will send your unpaid bills to a collection agency who will hound you for payment and which will ruin your credit score. The burden will be on you to prove that you told them to cancel your service and they didn't. It won't be impossible, mind you, but you'll need to fight to clear your credit because some company refuses to stop billing you in the hopes that you'll just send them more money because it's easier than trying to cancel.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:So... by fulldecent · · Score: 4, Informative

      The correct hard ball approach is: I am recording this call and forwarding to my local cable franchise authority.

      This is the entity that your local franchise must go through to offer service in your area and they are the ones that set rules like the number of seconds you may be placed on hold until you get a human without them having to pay a fine.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    4. Re:So... by njnnja · · Score: 2

      The correct hard ball approach is: I am recording this call and forwarding to my state attorneys general

      FTFY. Large companies generally aren't afraid of most government agencies, due to regulatory capture. But tell them that you might be in touch with the office of an ambitious politician with subpoena power and suddenly they become very helpful.

    5. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually...if you use a credit card, and dispute the charge after you tell them you want to cancel, it goes a bit better than that.

    6. Re:So... by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      Sadly, then the company will send your unpaid bills to a collection agency who will hound you for payment and which will ruin your credit score.

      Some people made the point that they can't ruin your credit score because they never extended credit -- a loan of money -- to you.

    7. Re:So... by taustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "This call may be recorded for quality assurance purposes" means that you have their permission to record it, too, even in California.

      "Cancel my account."

      "I can't do that unless you give me a reason."

      "I'm recording this conversation, so I have proof that the account has been canceled. If I receive any more invoices, the next phone call will be from my lawyer, or the police."

      Click.

      The better method, though, is to do it in writing, by registered mail. End of equation.

    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nothing like having a recording you can play for the court. Then you can sue for attempting to collect a fraudulent debt.

    9. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you tell them you're recording they immediately hang up. I've had that happen to me a few times. Now when they do their "This call may be recorded for quality assurance purposes" blurb I quickly respond that I'm also recording for legal purposes and tell them to stop their recording. No one has complained...

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, they will send your unpaid [bill] to a collection agency who will [not notify] you for payment and [six months later, finally notify the credit bureaus] and ruin your credit score.

      How do I know? Been there, done that. Beforehand, I'd only heard horror stories of Comcast's treatment of their ex-customers. Now I have a lowered credit score to prove it.

      Bottom line: if you're a current customer of Comcast, you'd might as well go ahead and lawyer up now...

    11. Re:So... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I did exactly this a couple of times and my credit wasn't ruined. I just attached the little protest note they let you attach and then no one gave a crap about my $50 argument with Verizon. I suppose my score would have been higher without that on there, but it was by no means ruined.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    12. Re:So... by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Regulatory capture can and does happen but is not a rule so much as it is a possibility.

    13. Re:So... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's only because your local agencies lack teeth. In some countries they are most definitely afraid of them, and best of all the agencies often act as consumer advocacy groups.

    14. Re:So... by odie5533 · · Score: 1

      The better method, though, is to do it in writing, by registered mail.

      Who are you going to send the letter to? I don't believe Comcast has a method to cancel your account in writing. Usually in the contract they state you must call them to cancel your account.

    15. Re:So... by odie5533 · · Score: 1

      I just attached the little protest note they let you attach and then no one gave a crap about my $50 argument with Verizon.

      Could you elaborate on this?

    16. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of you realize you're dealing with a CSR, right? Tell them you're recording it and then whatever comes after that probably doesn't matter to them.

    17. Re:So... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      In the USA at least, if there is some black mark on your credit report the credit agency has to allow you to put a comment on it. In one of my cases I put "Verizon told me I could get DSL, then later told me I could not, and still expected me to pay a setup fee"

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    18. Re:So... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Just a quick link for more details here

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    19. Re:So... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      One more thing. I didn't mean to say that no one gave a crap because of my consumer statement, I meant that no one gave a crap because it was a $50 dispute with Verizon

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    20. Re:So... by taustin · · Score: 2

      That's why you don't tell them until after you've told them to cancel the account. If they reserve the right to record it - which they did before the human came on the line - there is no expectation of privacy, and you don't need to tell them. You only tell them at the end to reinforce that you can prove you did.

    21. Re:So... by taustin · · Score: 1

      Contract provision or no, they're a corporation, and that means they are required by law, in every state, to have a business address published (usually with the secretary of state for the state they're incorporated in).

      They'll claim the contact prohibits notice by mail, but that's unenforceable to begin with, and when you describe the phone call - their flat refusal to accept the cancellation - or play the recording of it, even if it were technically enforceable the contract would be ruled unconscionable.

      You can believe in the ultimate, unchallengeable power of the Mighty Corporation(tm) all you want, but their only real power comes from your belief. If you stand your ground, and bother to know what the law is, it's on your side.

    22. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it goes to a collection agency that will ruin your credit score.

    23. Re:So... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      that they can't ruin your credit score because they never extended credit

      Do you pay up-front for your service BEFORE they give it to you? If not (hint: no you don't), they're extending credit to you, EVERY SINGLE MONTH.

      I like the pre-paid model, and it works well for any predictable bill like "unlimited"-anything plans. But for something billed based on consumption (electric, gas, water, etc.) it's somewhat impractical.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:So... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Or... You could just say two words: "Too Expensive". Comcast asked me why I cancelled my service 2+ years ago, and that's the answer I gave them. Apparently, they believed me, and I was a comcast customer for longer than 9 years before I cancelled.

      Now here is the interesting part: Ryan Block is an internet celebrity, and his wife is Veronica Belmont, also an internet celebrity. I would not be surprised if Comcast had a note of this in his file, and that is why the rep was so adamant about getting a good reason from him. It's almost like Aquaman calling the local water works company and telling them that he doesn't want water anymore. They wouldn't believe him.

    25. Re:So... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I did exactly this a couple of times and my credit wasn't ruined. I just attached the little protest note they let you attach and then no one gave a crap about my $50 argument with Verizon. I suppose my score would have been higher without that on there, but it was by no means ruined.

      I suspect your score is indeed lower, and that companies will take that bad report into account (and ignore your protest letter).

      Your credit history doesn't just impact your ability to get loans - it also impacts the interest rate you pay on those loans. So, disputed charges can cost you real money - quite a bit of it if you're talking about a mortgage.

      Big companies don't care whether you had a legitimate reason to dispute a charge. When they want to impose some illegal contract change on you they don't want you legitimately disputing their charges either.

    26. Re: So... by gmack · · Score: 1

      Been there done that, I sat down with a friend who was dropping AOL because the computer store he bought the computer from never mentioned that "3 free months of Internet" meant that they took his credit card and signed him up for AOL. The credit card company started from the assumption that since AOL was an established company that they would not need to charge back and we should talk to AOL about it.

      Que an endless "no sir we had no way to know you never used your account since we don't go into customer accounts without permission"

      The credit card companies are not always on your side.

    27. Re:So... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      If you just stop paying the bills and they don't cancel your service, they'll just send you a bill every month. Eventually, they will turn these bills over to a collection agency which will hound you for payment and which will, in turn, ruin your credit score.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    28. Re:So... by njnnja · · Score: 1

      Yes clearly my recommendation is jurisdiction-limited. In most countries they would probably wonder why you are talking about a state attorney general in the first place, as I doubt it's a common title outside of the US. Of course, a customer service rep in plenty of countries would probably wonder why you are speaking in English to them in the first place.

      But seriously even if I had the choice between a bureaucrat in a well-functioning regulatory body versus an aggressive American lawyer I would still pick the attorney general to best protect my interests.

    29. Re: So... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I believe there's a standard resolution policy that requires mail.

      Whenever dealing with cancellations or things like that, always use registered mail and keep the receipt. I've had problems with companies ignoring regular mail.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructions by KingTank · · Score: 2

    Probably something like "as you wait for confirmation that the service has been terminated, continue your attempts to save the customer". With no consideration given to the fact that it takes 8 fucking minutes.

  6. For those of us who didn't see it... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    How much do guys in Glengarry Glen Ross blush?

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    1. Re:For those of us who didn't see it... by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      See the movie. It's pretty good and is a perfect portrayal of slimy salesmen.

    2. Re:For those of us who didn't see it... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      That's not a particularly good selling of the movie.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:For those of us who didn't see it... by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      FYI my original post said "blanch", which is the exact opposite of "blush". Not complain', I'm just sayin'.

      But check out the film. Think Twelve Angry Men but about real estate sales instead of juries.

      .

    4. Re:For those of us who didn't see it... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      That's not a particularly good selling of the movie.

      So does he at least still get the set of steak knives?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:For those of us who didn't see it... by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      He can't help it, the leads were weak.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:For those of us who didn't see it... by zildgulf · · Score: 1

      SPOILER ALERT - Summary of movie:








      Scroll down for the Summary









      New Boss: CLOSE, D*mm*t, CLOSE you lazy b*tts!!!
      The Salesmen: The leads are weak.
      New Boss: I can get closes off your leads, but here is a list of my leads. You don't get my leads because you can't close ANY leads!! I will keep the top two of you guys and the rest of you will pound pavement in a week!
      The Salesmen: (Whispers: We got to get those leads and sell them for top dollar).

  7. why would anyone cancel comcast? by alen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    where else can you get hundreds of channels of TV i hate and crappy internet for one low price of $200 a month?
    what else would i do if i didn't have 400 channels of TV? how else would i watch commercials?

    1. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      where else can you get hundreds of channels of TV i hate and crappy internet for one low price of $200 a month?
      what else would i do if i didn't have 400 channels of TV? how else would i watch commercials?

      We changed comcast TV to the lowest package that you can get - just the local stations, and if we want something else we watch Netflix. Even with just the local stations there is still too much crap on TV.

      However if we could have gone a la carte for less price than a package, then we would have carved out the crap. Of course that will never happen.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      where else can you get hundreds of channels of TV i hate and crappy internet for one low price of $200 a month?
      what else would i do if i didn't have 400 channels of TV? how else would i watch commercials?

      We changed comcast TV to the lowest package that you can get - just the local stations, and if we want something else we watch Netflix.

      You're not really paying a cable company to provide you with content you could get for free OTA, are you?

      I've thought about signing back up for cable so I can watch Animal Planet (big fans of Caesar and Jackson in my household), but they won't let me de-couple the $30-50 fee for "local broadcast channels."

      So fuck 'em.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      A growing number of people don't live where they can get decent OTA reception. I'm close to 40 miles from the DC stations, not even accounting for terrain issues. OTA isn't viable at the outer reaches of a city...which is now bustling suburbs. I don't know of any stations that have multiple transmitters around major cities so the signal area is relatively fixed.

      Or in NYC, just getting a signal through all the buildings is a challenge.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    4. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      It's not about having the 5 or so useful local channels in your average market available to you, it's about having them in the same interface as the rest of your channels. Flipping back and forth between CNN and NBC should require another HDMI input, a cable box AND an antenna.

      It's fine to cut the cord, and of course we all want a la carte programing, but you're ultimately paying for the convenience of everything in one place.

      [Aside, this is one of the reasons I like my One. It honestly is the "One" device attached to my TV.]

    5. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      I guess living in the midwest, where it's not uncommon for a person to put a big-ass antenna up on their property.

      Hadn't considered the space limitations of those residing in cattle chutes, er, I mean, cities.

      If that's the case, just sign up for Aero! *snicker*

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Funny

      where else can you get hundreds of channels of TV i hate and crappy internet for one low price of $200 a month?

      $200 a month? That is a heck of a deal. I've got the $99 Cox Bundle and that costs about $250 a month.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      Agreed DTV has pretty much killed OTA, before then yea ok it might have been less than optimal reception, DTV makes it into a impossible to watch slide show of garbled up images and staccato sounds

    8. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you why I have Comcrap: when I first signed up, it was only $30/month, for 6 months, for just internet service. It then rose up to its present price, about $75/month. The speed is better than Verizon, and it's fairly reliable. Yes, the price sucks, and I'm not looking forward to cancelling when I move out, but what choice do I have? It's either this or Verizon. Verizon isn't any cheaper; it's about the same price actually, unless I sign up for some 2-year plan (which is a bad idea since I most probably will not be living here that much longer), the speeds are slower, and Verizon doesn't exactly have a great reputation either. Also, my neighbors have Verizon and they have a lot of problems with it going out.

    9. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Sounds like someone else lives on the outskirts of a metropolitan area surrounded by tree covered hills. I had the big antenna on a 16' mast attached to the chimney but that still wasn't enough to get much of a digital signal, but when the analogue broadcasts were still happening I got all of the channels. When I last tried to watch TV I could sometimes get the primary FOX and NBC station but nothing else so I just basically gave up on TV. Between Netflix, Hulu, and the existing collection of DVDs if I want to watch something I probably can.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    10. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I live a bit out of town but not out in the boonies, and yea with analog and just rabbit ears I could pick up stations 2 hours up the road from the neighboring state

    11. Re: why would anyone cancel comcast? by Amtrak · · Score: 1

      When I lived in a Chicago apartment I got unwatchable reception on every channel but pbs and WGN even though I could see the antennas on top of sears and Hancock towers out my window. Sometimes living in a concrete canyon works in the cable company's favor.

    12. Re:why would anyone cancel comcast? by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      Agreed the FCC and it's greed for more licensing fees has pretty much killed OTA...

      FTFY

  8. The worst company in the world by briancox2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comcast simply will not accept being second place in the competition for the worst company in existence.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    1. Re:The worst company in the world by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I listened to the whole thing. It was amazing, and not in a good way. Keep in mind that this was also TEN MINUTES into the conversation already when he started the conversation. Unbelievable. I'm guessing these guys are financially rewarded for re-subscribing customers who call to cancel. It should be blindingly obvious that this would be the inevitable result of that.

      It reminds me of an experience I had with EA when trying to unsubscribe to the wholly unremarkable MMO "Earth and Beyond". I was bored to tears with the game and no longer wished to pay each month for the privilege of not playing, but soon discovered I actually had to call and talk with a "customer representative" (i.e. someone paid to convince me not to cancel my subscription), rather than simply allowing me to do it over the internet as when I signed up. While the experience was nowhere near as bad as this poor schlub's, it was not a comfortable or pleasant experience either, and I vowed that I would never sign up for an EA MMO or ever give them my credit card again. It will be a cold day in hell before Origin is ever installed on my system.

      It's probably true that such a system can convince a certain number of customers to continue subscribing, but it's harder to factor in how such a poor customer service experience will damage a company's reputation in the long run. Fortunately for gamers, the videogame industry is still reasonably competitive compared to the cable industry, and as such, has a harder time devolving into the infuriating sorts of customer experience witnessed here.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:The worst company in the world by lgw · · Score: 1

      Hey, now, Origin performs a vital service to the community - it keeps EA games off out Steam, so that folks don't accidentally buy one!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:The worst company in the world by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have sworn off shopping at Canadian Tire ever since the month that they tried to sell Canadian Tire bank accounts by putting someone in the store on commision.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:The worst company in the world by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      Comcast simply will not accept being second place in the competition for the worst company in existence.

      They may try, but at eight minutes they pale in comparison to my experience with AT&T. It was at least 10 years back, but in trying to cancel an AT&T DSL account it took me four freaking hours. And no that's not hyperbole. It took so damn long that the cordless phone I had at the time went from fully charged to near dead (it started beeping near death).

      It went sort of like this - call DSL dept, "I want to cancel"... Oh you have to talk to billing, let me transfer you... 10 minutes later, billing says "No that's a DSL service, you need to talk to DSL dept", let me transfer you... Transfer .. Wait .. Repeat .. Transfer .. Transfer .. Disconnected .. Repeat again. Went through over a dozen people, and apparently they were taking notes along the way, by the time I finally got to someone with authority she said "Looks like you talked to just about everyone in the company". Yeah, no shit, you think!?

      It was such an aggravating experience, I have not had AT&T service of any kind since, and never will again.

    5. Re:The worst company in the world by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Hey, now, Origin performs a vital service to the community - it keeps EA games off out Steam, so that folks don't accidentally buy one!

      Heh, yeah, it's sort of inadvertently had that effect for me. I wasn't necessarily trying to boycott EA altogether, but that was the end result for PC titles at least. It probably hasn't hurt them much, though. The increased profits from their own store probably offset losses from people like me.

      Honestly, though, Valve isn't necessarily the white knight in the Steam/Origin powerplay either. They already take a pretty massive cut of the game's initial purchase price. Then on top of that, Steam's DLC policy basically means that companies that rely on large amounts of DLC for additional revenue and use their own in-game DLC store won't be publishing on Steam. It's a somewhat draconian policy, except perhaps if the game in question was completely free to play, in which case it makes some sense to share the revenue. After all, what business is it of Valve's what DLC transactions are made inside a game that they sell? Were they hemorrhaging money from lost DLC sales? Pfft, hardly - they just wanted a cut of that action, and since it's their store, they make the rules.

      I'd argue it demonstrates why it's probably a bad thing in the long run to have a single company completely dominate any field, like... oh, Comcast, perhaps?

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:The worst company in the world by lgw · · Score: 1

      DLC policy basically means that companies that rely on large amounts of DLC for additional revenue and use their own in-game DLC store won't be publishing on Steam

      For me, that's just as nice as Origin. Games will just have to make money without selling Smurfberries to 8-year-olds. Ultimately, GoG is the only one I'm rooting for, but Steam isn't terrible.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  9. nobody ever won a war with their customers by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    don't understand why this is not more widely understood.

    1. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except AT&T

    2. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS wins every year.

    3. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, some managed to bribe the referees.

      For reference, see copyright.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why am I cancelling? Because Comcast has assholes like you in customer service!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by rsborg · · Score: 3

      don't understand why this is not more widely understood.

      Problem is, we aren't Comcast's only customers. Also the meaning of "customer" changes when a monopoly is in place (which is very much the case in many areas - Comcast may provide the only viable internet or subscription TV).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    6. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS, and by extension, the Government are your employees. You aren't a client, you're the boss.

      Maybe not the best, or smartest or even competent employess but.... hmm

    7. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because customers don't immediately respond to questions like "why should we discontinue your service?" with responses such as "because I have informed my credit card provider that we are no longer doing business together, and they will refuse all further charges and will charge back any they don't refuse, at cost of $35 per false charge to Xfinity Inc."

    8. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS doesn't have customers.

    9. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      The IRS doesn't have customers.

      That's correct.. They have victims.. They're bad enough as the "extortion arm" of the US government, but WAIT till they get fully spooled up with your health care... Things are gonna get REALLY bad...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    10. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by praxis · · Score: 1

      When I pay the IRS I get something for my money. If I were to choose to pay Comcast I would get a rebroadcast of what I already receive over the air. I don't mind paying for something, I would mind paying for nothing.

    11. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS doesn't have customers.

      That's correct.. They have victims.. They're bad enough as the "extortion arm" of the US government, but WAIT till they get fully spooled up with your health care... Things are gonna get REALLY bad...

      The people who work for the IRS are generally as helpful as someone can be when their job it to read you excerpts of an 800,000 page manual, written by lawyers, which changes every year, which no one reads until April 14th and which enough lawyer power can get the SCOTUS to change the definitions on demand.

      The IRS doesn't charge you taxes, they just tell you what Congress says you owe. The IRS doesn't get to keep the money, like when cops steal your cash as "evidence". Much less your car or computer. If you don't like the service you get from the IRS (or DMV, etc), vote for someone else. If the ballot box isn't working, try the ammo box if you feel so strongly, starting with your own local officials and work your way up.

      Me? I like clean air, water and roads that a bus can drive on, so I'm not happy with what I get, but I'm content enough.

    12. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to blame Obama and the AGW crowd.

      Also, you forgot to explain how you've got guns and we don't need government because you can protect what you've worked hard to get and everyone else can go fuck themselves, even if there are more of them than you, and you will be killed by them.

    13. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Right. When comcast starts to get money from Netflix and maybe hulu, then what is the incentive for them to treat the consumers with respect?

    14. Re:nobody ever won a war with their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This X eleventybillion. I have NO viable alternative... Until october. Thanks to the Rural Broadband Initiative my local phone company (TDS Telecom) is in the process of running fiber. There's a massive spool of it on the pole in front of my house. I cannot f'ing wait to send comcast their modem back with a knife through it. Now all I need to do is come up with a viable alternative to Verizon Wireless...

  10. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by internerdj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone astutely put it somewhere else that a cancelation is probably a "failed customer problem resolution" and negatively impacts a performance review or bonus consideration.

  11. 105 megabits per second by Vermonter · · Score: 0

    If I am hearing correctly, this guy was signed up for 105 megabits per second... Do you know how hard it is to use 105 megabits/second? Netflix in HD only uses up 5... unless this guy has a family of 20, with each person watching HD content, 105 Megabits/second is a waste of money. I mean granted, maybe some people here can tell me how a single family home can use that much bandwidth (downloading several dozen torrents simultaneously?), but my family doesn't even use half of our 30 Megabit/second bandwidth.

    1. Re:105 megabits per second by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

      I mean granted, maybe some people here can tell me how a single family home can use that much bandwidth (downloading several dozen torrents simultaneously?), but my family doesn't even use half of our 30 Megabit/second bandwidth.

      Two words: Minecraft Server.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:105 megabits per second by alen · · Score: 1

      marketing gimmick for nerds to think they have a big penis
      just like giant SUV's, graphics cards that give you 10,000 FPS in some game, etc

      i was visiting some family with comcast and netflix on their 5mbps service was better than my 20/2 time warner at home. same with youtube. and same result with other family i have with cablevision.

      comcast has a direct connection to netflix and is youtube HD certified. cablevision has open connect. having an ISP that links directly to your content will give you better results than some number that only works on speedtest.net no matter what the network neutrality morons will say

    3. Re:105 megabits per second by manquer · · Score: 1

      Netflix Ultra HD requires 25 Mbps per stream. Also that 105 Mbps is basically the connection between his house and the ISP. The actual speeds you will get depends on where the data is, and the peering agreements, Netflix's of-quoted data on comcast before and after their deal is itself good example

    4. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix SuperHD is more than 5, but yea, I get by with 25 megabits quite fine.

    5. Re:105 megabits per second by radish · · Score: 2

      It's not about average usage, it's about instantaneous usage. Most of the time my connection is pretty idle, but when I want to download something big (e.g. multiple gigs) I don't really want to wait around for it. That's what I'm paying for - not having to wait.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:105 megabits per second by phizi0n · · Score: 2

      You don't know how he uses it or what his income is or if he's even paying for it (work might reimburse it) so how could you possibly know if it's a waste of money. Maybe he needs to download gigs of data for work... Also download speed isn't the only aspect of a connection, perhaps they wanted higher upstream bandwidth or lower latency.

    7. Re:105 megabits per second by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      TL;DR: I don't need it, therefore no one does.

    8. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most servers can't serve data that fast to a single user.

    9. Re:105 megabits per second by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      TFA says he's a producer at AOL. Seeing as how he's an AOL employee, he probably needs a lot more bandwidth than you do, as you're someone who probably just works in I.T. Go figure. I don't understand anything about AOL either.

      Obviously he needs way more bandwidth than he can get via an (AOL) dial-up modem, which explains why he's been with Comcast for the last 9 years.

      Someone that works from home might opt for a larger package to obtain greater uploading bandwidth. I did that to advance from 1.5 to 6 Mbps recently myself, and I'm glad I did.

      Maybe this is just AOL picking a Telecom fight with Comcast. Seriously, since when is it ever legal to record a call like this? But I suppose it becomes legal when you're on hold and the recording played to you says they'll record you first.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    10. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting about data caps and Comcast has them. Comcast like most ISPs that have caps scale the size with the speed making speed only half of what you need to consider.

    11. Re:105 megabits per second by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Upload is what matters. He is married to an internet personality who probably uploads video often. The ability to upload hd video in 1/20 the time is a big benifit. You don't want to wait 20 min to upload a 20 min vid. Not when it can take 1 minutes. The 19 min difference can get your content out before other sites.

    12. Re:105 megabits per second by hypergreatthing · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had a 150Mbit connection and i found uses for it all. Having that much extra headroom is very useful.
      Just because you can't find a way or can even fathom why someone would want that speed doesn't mean there aren't good uses for it.
      I really don't understand the need to say no one needs more than 640k of memory. It plainly makes you look dull.

    13. Re:105 megabits per second by robot256 · · Score: 1

      One word: Bittorrent.

    14. Re:105 megabits per second by robot256 · · Score: 1

      I meant to add, boy is it fun maxing out my 150Mbps connection, getting 15 Mega BYTES per second on a 1GB file.

    15. Re:105 megabits per second by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I'm seeding a couple of torrents and they use up my 500mbps connection quite well (current upload speed 52MB/s).

    16. Re:105 megabits per second by bobbied · · Score: 1

      It's not about average usage, it's about instantaneous usage.

      For some of us who play peer to peer games, it's not really about bandwidth usage but how long it takes to get the packet from here to there and back. It's about latency. Generally higher bandwidth means lower latency, but it's not a hard and fast rule.

      If you are just downloading or streaming stuff, it's all about bandwidth then because a latency of even a few seconds won't matter much.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    17. Re:105 megabits per second by tboulan · · Score: 1

      Netflix is a direct competitor to comcast. You need pay for 105 megabits/second just to keep the low def buffering to a minimum.

    18. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure Netflix Ultra HD only requires 5Mbps per stream...

    19. Re:105 megabits per second by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      If I am hearing correctly, this guy was signed up for 105 megabits per second... Do you know how hard it is to use 105 megabits/second? Netflix in HD only uses up 5... unless this guy has a family of 20, with each person watching HD content, 105 Megabits/second is a waste of money. ..

      Unless you are paying his bill, what is it to you what level of service he decides to get for himself?

    20. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I am hearing correctly, this guy was signed up for 105 megabits per second... Do you know how hard it is to use 105 megabits/second? Netflix in HD only uses up 5... unless this guy has a family of 20, with each person watching HD content, 105 Megabits/second is a waste of money. I mean granted, maybe some people here can tell me how a single family home can use that much bandwidth (downloading several dozen torrents simultaneously?), but my family doesn't even use half of our 30 Megabit/second bandwidth.

      I have a far faster home connection than I ever need for more than 90% of my internet usage.

      But when I instal a new Steam game that wants a 10 gig download, its nice to be able to pull on a hilariously fast connection and not wait half an hour to start playing my new game.

      Not many places will let you max out your pipe. Steam is one of them, and its useful.

    21. Re:105 megabits per second by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Seriously, since when is it ever legal to record a call like this?

      Firstly, only 12 of the 50 States require that all parties to a telephone call consent to it being recorded. To quote wikipedia, those States are California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii (in general a one-party state, but requires two-party consent if the recording device is installed in a private place), Illinois (debated, see next section), Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana (requires notification only), Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington.

      Secondly. one of the first things you get when you call a customer service department for any large telecom is a recording that states that the call may be recorded.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    22. Re:105 megabits per second by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      Per their help page, HD is 5Mbps, Ultra HD is 25 Mbps.

      https://help.netflix.com/en/no...

    23. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      our family of 3 struggles on a bonded 40 megabit. training kids to not have constant android app crap updates and their over the top messengers going constantly is an uphill struggle. one of us is on xbox live constantly (and has no idea how big a 6GB game download really is regardless of what we say) and the rest of us expect to watch catchup tv when we want. paying 4x the typical household rate for our connections is actually easier than trying to manage on less and going round to each persons devices and pissing them off with trying to control what they do. i QOS what i can, i run local media servers to lighten that load, a 6 tuner ArgusTV server for the stupid fucking soaps people watch and miss. the thing is the baseline of what is necessary to work keeps moving, it's unavoidable 'progress'

    24. Re:105 megabits per second by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      You are oversimplifying. In tech we reach plateaus of 'good enough' for the time and resources involved.

      --
      Good-bye
    25. Re:105 megabits per second by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Local compression is faster than the internet is most places. Compress 10:1 or 8:1 and transmit. I get what you are saying, but there are many ways to skin that cat that dont rely on pure brute bandwidth.

      --
      Good-bye
    26. Re:105 megabits per second by swillden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I am hearing correctly, this guy was signed up for 105 megabits per second... Do you know how hard it is to use 105 megabits/second?

      Sigh.

      Slashdot, how far you have fallen.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    27. Re:105 megabits per second by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Impose quotas and QoS. Establish your nerd dominance.

      --
      Good-bye
    28. Re:105 megabits per second by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      ...and in case you missed the implication of what Rockoon is saying, once they say they're recording it, even in a two-party state, you've got their consent. They already know they're being recorded, so no issues.

      There's some caveats about not being in the same state as the person you're recording, and it generally means you have to use the most restrictive law of the two states.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

      IANAL, TINLA

    29. Re:105 megabits per second by praxis · · Score: 1

      Generally higher bandwidth means lower latency

      Could you explain how that is, please?

    30. Re:105 megabits per second by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      They already know they're being recorded, so no issues.

      Also, due to the ambiguity of words, they are giving permission. "This call may be recorded..[by you]"

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    31. Re:105 megabits per second by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you write a multiplayer video game using TCP/IP with minimal client side prediction.

    32. Re:105 megabits per second by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Hitting 100Mbit/s peak? Well, today I bought Divinity: Original Sin on Steam and of course that was faster. And it's July, if I want to go to our cabin (no fixed line, barely 3G w/mobile cap) I need to download anything I'd like to bring with me for a rainy day. After a trip with some friends I sent him the videos we'd made (raw 1080p/60 from the camera) and that maxed my line.

      Of course, I didn't need 100 Mbit for any of that but on the other hand what's the savings to the ISP if I up/download the same number of GB slower? Across many thousands of subscribers in my city it evens out anyway and they still have to maintain the fiber line and modems at each end so there's no last mile bottleneck, in fact they can switch speeds at will with a simple software update. I suppose with higher speeds I might become a bit more careless about bits and bytes but for the most part it's just convenience, not total throughput.

      I think that's reflected in the pricing too, the lowest they offer here is 5/5. Next level: +400% bandwidth, +30% price. After that: +150% bandwidth, +23% price. Finally to reach 100/100: +100% bandwidth, +18% price. Unlike water, electricity or other utilities the higher speeds you got, the faster you're done and the line returns to idle and the premium is not even remotely close to the theoretical increase in bandwidth.

      Over the next couple years they'll be rolling out gigabit Internet, do people need it? Of course not, but it's nice to have. I'll probably get it if the premium is not too high, with fiber it could become as standard as GigE on motherboards and all you really pay for is bulk bandwidth. I ran into that on my cell phone this month (vacation time), cap used up so I'm on slooow connection until next month rolls around or pay more this month for increased cap.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    33. Re:105 megabits per second by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      In tech we reach plateaus of 'good enough' for the time and resources involved.

      And then someone comes up with some kind of outlier use case that exceeds the requirements of "good enough", and sometimes that use case becomes more and more common over time. "Good enough" is constantly redefined.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    34. Re:105 megabits per second by bobbied · · Score: 2

      As a general rule, higher bandwidth connections are "faster" end to end, this is NOT universally true, just normally. Consider the latency of sending 100 bytes over a 2400 baud modem verses the same latency noted on a gigabit link (extreme example, I know). It will take a LONG time to transfer that 100 bytes over the modem link then receive a similar reply just because the physical layer takes so long. Higher bandwidth will lower latency.

      How much difference is this physical layer delay considering say 10BaseT to 100BaseT? Minor but measurable, all things being equal. But, in general, getting higher bandwidth means newer equipment, which means lower latency, at least on your link.

      There is also the "store and forward" part of switches/routers, which if a link is saturated may queue up packets where having more bandwidth will result in less saturation of the link, and thus less queuing. So again, bandwidth can lower latency.

      Normally the biggest driver for latency is router performance and the number of links between the two points, unless there is a saturated link, then you will see queuing delays being the major driver. There are lots of special cases... But that's what network admins are paid to understand and deal with.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    35. Re:105 megabits per second by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      For some of us who play peer to peer games, it's not really about bandwidth usage but how long it takes to get the packet from here to there and back.

      ...Until you sit down ready to play your game and it decides to download a big patch instead of letting you log in.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    36. Re:105 megabits per second by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      That's why I think internet speed should be measured in Gigabytes per month. Seriously. About once per week I get snailspam from CenturyLink, wanting me to upgrade from 7 bullshit units to 20 bullshit units. Except each "plan" is the same number of Gigabytes per month. So how it is an "upgrade?" Oh, if I give you more money, I'll be able to hit my cap faster? That's silly.

      Now if you're telling me my cap will change from 200GB to 571GB, that is an upgrade I might be willing to pay for. Because then you'd be talking actually-relevant numbers.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    37. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the first things you get when you call a customer service department for any large telecom is a recording that states that the call may be recorded.

      Careful. In some states, people have been caught by that. Courts ruled that my informing you that I'm recording you doesn't give you permission to record me. This is, in part, because their message gives you a notice that you can opt-out of their recording (as required by law), but you are not providing an equivalent notice to allow them to opt out of yours (as required by law).

      (IANAL, IIWALTINLA, TCMBRFQATPPIYCSRIYDNWTBR)

    38. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're also paying for not having to wait?

    39. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring the fact that it's "up to" 105 and that you normally don't get that, Comcast forces you to upgrade in order to get a tiny increase in upload bandwidth. Upload bandwidth does matter to a lot of people.

    40. Re:105 megabits per second by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The notice doesn't usually say anything about them recording you... It literally says "this call may be recorded". In English, that's expressly granting permission.

    41. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tor Exit node!

    42. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To fall, you have to be high at some point. Slashdot has always been a pandering to the freesource zealotry.

    43. Re:105 megabits per second by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      There are other things to do on the internet other than watch Netflix. I can saturate my 80mb/s connection fairly consistently without thinking about it when doing GIS stuff.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    44. Re:105 megabits per second by swillden · · Score: 1

      To fall, you have to be high at some point. Slashdot has always been a pandering to the freesource zealotry.

      There's nothing low about "freesource zealotry", particularly among those who actually contribute their time and skills to free software. Quite the opposite, in fact.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    45. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 50mbps and I can tell you that it is *very* useful.

      If I had 10mbps it would take me 5ish hours to download a large game like Rage from Steam. With 50mbps it takes less than an hour, Steam usually maxes out my connection. Not sure if it would max out 105mbps but if it did we'd be looking at half an hour.

      So in other words, it isn't that difficult to max 50mbps. I don't think the value is there for 105mbps, but if I could get Google Fiber and get gigabit speeds for $70 a month I'd do it in a heartbeat. Now *that* is so much speed that I don't know what I'd do with it.

    46. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, 640k of RAM should be enough for everybody.

    47. Re:105 megabits per second by praxis · · Score: 1

      It will take a LONG time to transfer that 100 bytes over the modem link then receive a similar reply just because the physical layer takes so long. Higher bandwidth will lower latency

      Latency is the measure of how long a signal takes to reach the other end, no? High latency will reduce your throughput, but throughput has little (not none) effect on your latency. Is my thinking incorrect?

    48. Re:105 megabits per second by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Think about what you just said for a few... Latency is about how fast you can get some piece of information from one point to another, so if you are only interested in "it's on" or "it's off" then what you say is true, it's about the physical layer and how long the signal takes to propagate physically down the link. But, for networking, we generally send data in "packets" which are always more than one bit. Modulation schemes exist that can send multiple bits per unique signal state (can send more than one bit at a time) but even a small "ping" packet will exceed what can be encoded in one signal state.

      In the case where you have to send more than a one unique signal state to send your "packet" of information then the link rate matters because it says how long it takes between unique states at the physical layer. Think of it as sending each bit down the wire, one at a time, the faster you can put the bits on the wire and still receive them at the other end the shorter the transmission time for the "packet" will be.

      So, to send 100 bytes on a 14.4Kbaud modem takes longer than the same 100 bytes on the ADSL link going over the same lines. Physically the speed of the signals going over the wire are the same, being electrical signals going over the same wires, but the 100 bytes go faster (and have lower latency) on the ADSL link because they get on and off the wire faster.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    49. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely mean it when I say: Go fuck yourself, Luddite.

    50. Re:105 megabits per second by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yes - it wasn't that long ago that VHS-quality video streaming was an edge case.

    51. Re:105 megabits per second by praxis · · Score: 1

      Physically the speed of the signals going over the wire are the same, being electrical signals going over the same wires, but the 100 bytes go faster (and have lower latency) on the ADSL link because they get on and off the wire faster.

      That's why I said it has little effect. I'm convinced that latency has a large effect on throughput but I am unconvinced that throughput has a large effect on latency. I get 16ms latency on my ADSL connection, which is 1.5Mb/s. I don't know anyone with 20+ Mb/s cable connections that has much lower latency than my connection. On the other hand, if you go to something like a 2400 baud modem then latencies are up noticeably.

      So, am I misunderstanding? Gigabit fibre should have significantly better latency than a lowly 1.5Mb/s ADSL link? I am not sure it does (haven't tested one).

    52. Re:105 megabits per second by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would expect that in general a gigabit fiber link would be lower latency than a 1.5Mb/s ADSL link.

      I don't think I disagree with your last statement. Except to say that there are reasons for higher bandwidth links to be lower latency which are related to the actual time it takes to get a data packet physically on and off the link (which was what I originally claimed) AND for other reasons which are not directly related to the link's speed (bandwidth). In order of increasing importance:

      1. Link propagation delay (Cannot go faster than the speed of light, so how long is that path? If you have a satellite hop to a geostationary connection and back, you have a LOT of latency dictated by physics alone.)

      2. Physical throughput/Bandwidth (how fast can we encode and decode data on the physical links).

      3. Congestion in Switching (Higher throughput means less "store and forward" is happening. Buffering data increases latency.)

      4. Number of network hops (Each hop means the packet got taken off the wire and put on another, which takes time. Routers look at the data, which takes even more time. Higher bandwidth equipment usually has faster hardware too.)

      5. Driver/System software delays (Kernel time of the operating system. Higher bandwidth usually come with faster hardware and processors.)

      So are we good?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    53. Re:105 megabits per second by praxis · · Score: 1

      I don't think we ever weren't good. I was just learning because what I learned in signals and systems did not jive with what you claimed. It turns out you and I were using latency differently.

    54. Re:105 megabits per second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I had a 150Mbit connection and i found uses for it all. Having that much extra headroom is very useful."

      Yet, you did not cite even one example of that. The extra headroom is useful in what way? Your reply is plainly dull and worthless.

      I suspect the biggest use of a 150Mbit connection is to say "I have a 150Mbit connection."

  12. Only sorry they got caught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're only sorry they got caught.

    As for instructing the bot to personally apologize, that wouldn't cut it with me. If a rep were to call me after I just got through firing his company. He will never get a chance to apologize. And yes my coworkers have heard me do things like that to other reps who have called after their companies were fired.

    1. Re:Only sorry they got caught by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their apology was sincere. They even offered to continue his service at a 'special rate'.

    2. Re:Only sorry they got caught by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh? How much are you going to pay me to use your service?

      Well, that's what I'd have asked...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Only sorry they got caught by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Their apology was sincere. They even offered to continue his service at a 'special rate'.

      Sounds to me like an admission that they're overcharging everyone else.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Only sorry they got caught by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like an admission that they're overcharging everyone else.

      Well we dont know what they were charging him, but we do know that one of the final desperate attempts by the customer service guy was to offer to save the man over $100/month on his service. My cable company cannot offer me that because I pay less than $100/month, so its an admission that they're overcharging him but not so much an admission that anyone else is being overcharged.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Only sorry they got caught by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I did this when I cancelled my Comcast TV service.

      Comcast rep: "would you be willing to continue your service if we give you a discount?"

      Me: "Sure, if you can make it cost $0 or less!"

      Comcast rep: "..."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Only sorry they got caught by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      They sent reps door to door in my neighborhood to get people to "switch back". They know no bounds.

  13. Very typical of them by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They've done this to me. They interurpt you, they refuse to let you speak until you scream. They just keep talking. They make excuses, they contradict themselves. They are just unbelievable.

    This recording is a great example of how Comcast representives are trained to talk you. Obviously, a monopolist can just abuse you and treat you any way they want.

    1. Re:Very typical of them by retchdog · · Score: 2

      it all sounds familiar.

      i was waiting for "what are your crimes?"

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    2. Re:Very typical of them by Art+Challenor · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the "Invisible Hand", and appealing, and also completely wrong theory. What market strategy gave the world Comcast and similar monoplies in the first place? Contrast this with the heavily regulated and much superior services in most of Western Europe.

    3. Re:Very typical of them by mi · · Score: 0

      What market strategy gave the world Comcast and similar monoplies in the first place?

      It was not a market strategy. It was a government's decision to only allow one cable-TV company to serve a particular area. Much like the previous decision to only allow AT&T to provide telephone service... In exchange to getting this government-enforced monopoly, the companies were expected to "behave", but, as any monopoly would, did not...

      My point was, however, that monopolies suck. In that I was in agreement with bigsexyjoe. What he didn't understand, however — judging by a link to pro-big government blog in his signature — is that the government, being the largest monopoly, sucks the most. With Comcast, at least, you can cancel your service, after all. Now try canceling your Social Security membership...

      Contrast this with the heavily regulated and much superior services in most of Western Europe.

      If you know something about the broadband in Europe — and their customer-satisfaction — you failed to share the link(s).

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Very typical of them by houghi · · Score: 1

      Listening to it, it clearly is a management issue. The call agent probably will loose his job over this, becayuse he was the one that got taped, while management was pushing them to do this.
      Somewhere it will be written that call agents should not be doing this, but get payed for retention and are trained to do it that way.
      If bonusses are directed towards retention, then retention is what they will do, no matter what. These agents do what most people would do. See how they can make the most money. That is why they get incentives for retention, because that is what the management thinks is important.
      If they would not think that is important, they would not put the money there.

      Obviously the 'quick action' will be firing this guy. However what is actualy needed is not a quick action, but rather a slow action. This means first looking what your priorities are and what your goals are as management and be seriosu about it. If it is money, OK, then do this and back up the people on the phone. Tell them he did a great job.

      If it is customer service, find what you think actualy IS good customer service, without forgetting you also want to make money. (Yes, you can do both.)
      Good service (or Quality for most managers) is something where if you ask 5 people, you get 6 opinions, so you need to have the definition ready that everybody in higher management will defend.

      Next work your way down. This might need a complete change of mindset for the company and will take 2 to 4 years for a company the size of Comcast IF management agrees on it.

      Told you what is needed was a slow action.

      If _I_ were Comcast, I would go for the money and buy a couple of new houses. Much easier to fire a call agent, his trainer and is supervisor than doing this change your mind shit for 4 years.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Very typical of them by Rockoon · · Score: 0

      It was a government's decision to only allow one cable-TV company to serve a particular area.

      Indeed. The Statists will admit that Government enables these monopolies to exist, but they still blame it on Corporations, but change the topic to the influence of Money on Government.

      They cannot form an internally consistent argument that includes both the Good People in Government that wont allow Money to dictate Policy and the Bad Corporations that use their Money to influence Policy to exist simultaneously.

      Even dictatorships are great when the Dictator is one of those Good People.

      The problem isnt that corporations seek influence over government. A core ideal of a free society is in fact that the potential to influence government does not discriminate. Black, White, Male, Female, Church, Charity, Business, ... The problem is that those in government are generally not Good People, and when Bad People form policy, regardless of the intentions that support policy change, you get Bad Effects.

      It used to be that every single representative everywhere in the country was a White Man. It took a long time for Blacks to attain the right to vote, and even longer for Women to attain the right to vote. The Bad Policy wasn't dictated by Bad Corporations, just the White Men of government that werent Good People.

      Government is the problem. It is a necessary evil, but still always and forever evil. The Statists that so casually cry out for more government influence are supporters of evil.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Very typical of them by sd4f · · Score: 1

      This recording is a great example of how Comcast representives are trained to talk you.

      Or the worker just watched 'wolf of wall street' and saw that as a salesman, if he behaves that way, he can get promoted and eventually snort coke out of a hooker's arse...

    7. Re:Very typical of them by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The Statists will admit that Government enables these monopolies to exist, but they still blame it on Corporations, but change the topic to the influence of Money on Government.

      Nah. They will point to the fact that some areas of business are just natural monopolies. Don't get me wrong - regulatory capture makes it even worse than it would be otherwise, but even though it is fairly free from regulation and many of the last mile problems I don't see 47 companies offering satellite cable.

      The corporations are doing what they always do - charge whatever the market will bear. Regulation is required anytime you have a monopoly, no matter how it got there. Obviously regulation that encourages competition so as to minimize the need for future regulation should be preferred.

      I'd argue that the best solution is to break up the vertical integration. Have a traditional utility (cost-plus basis) own the last mile wires. Then let anybody sell services over them. The service providers would not be allowed to own the utilities, but otherwise they would be free from regulation. The utilities would just charge you a monthly fee to maintain the lines, and would charge a flat rate to anybody renting rack-space to provide services - they wouldn't be in a position to choose winners/losers/etc.

      The idea is that regulation of some things is necessary, but we should try to structure regulation so that we minimize its scope.

    8. Re:Very typical of them by mi · · Score: 1

      some areas of business are just natural monopolies

      "Natural monopolies" — a pro-government excuse like "market failure". If Tokyo has competing subway lines, why can't New York City have any?

      Regulation is required anytime you have a monopoly, no matter how it got there.

      The primary focus of the "regulation" is to try to ensure the presence of healthy competition — which is by far the best regulator there can be. No government-created monopolies (like AT&T's) and no duopolies either, please (as there were with cell-phone service in the 90ies).

      Thus, it does matter, "how it got there" — if it was government-orchestrated in the first place (as AT&T was), for example, it may need to be forcibly split-up. If it grew up on its own (like Microsoft), it just needs to be watched so that it does not use its monopoly position to against competition.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:Very typical of them by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      some areas of business are just natural monopolies

      "Natural monopolies" — a pro-government excuse like "market failure". If Tokyo has competing subway lines, why can't New York City have any?

      Well, why don't you go build one? Just spend a few billion of your own money - I'm sure you'll make a profit in no time, despite not being able to charge your full costs due to the presence of an established company that has paid for these sunk costs.

      Regulation is required anytime you have a monopoly, no matter how it got there.

      The primary focus of the "regulation" is to try to ensure the presence of healthy competition — which is by far the best regulator there can be. No government-created monopolies (like AT&T's) and no duopolies either, please (as there were with cell-phone service in the 90ies).

      Thus, it does matter, "how it got there" — if it was government-orchestrated in the first place (as AT&T was), for example, it may need to be forcibly split-up. If it grew up on its own (like Microsoft), it just needs to be watched so that it does not use its monopoly position to against competition.

      I agree that one of the best ways to use regulation is to create competition, thus minimizing the scope of regulation.

      However, I don't think the origin of the monopoly matters at all. Obviously if a monopoly resulted from poor regulation that should be fixed, simply because it is poor regulation. However, all monopolies will tend to use their position to block competition and extract maximum economic rent. That is just the nature of business. It is only the fear of regulation that might cause companies to avoid it at all. If they didn't do these things in the US the directors could probably be sued for it.

  14. Had to stop after a minute... by Chas · · Score: 1

    I listened to this earlier today. I had to stop listening after about a minute because just listening to it made me angry enough to want to break things and kill people (not exaggerating).

    Had I been the caller, I'd have been frothing at the mouth at this jackass. Or I'd have hung up before I threw the phone, and called back to talk to someone else.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually don't see what would be wrong with just explaining that you didn't feel that the service was a good value, and that you feel they don't display respect for their customers.

      Like, it's a drop dead easy question, and there is no good reason to keep that private.

    2. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds scary if you would actually break objects or kill people just over some ISP account. It's not worth it, man.

    3. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by gman003 · · Score: 1

      And there is no good reason to make it public, either. If I want to stop doing business with anybody, I do not have to give them a reason.

      They aren't really interested in the reason - at least, the CSR doesn't give a single fuck about it. I'm sure management is interested in the numbers, but even then I doubt they care too much. The CSR was just using it as a ploy to make it harder to cancel.

      Had it been me, I would have said this:
      "If you continue to refuse to cancel my service, I will be forced to take legal action. This call is being recorded and may be used as evidence. I don't know how bad your employers penalties are for letting a customer leave, but I imagine the penalties for giving a customer grounds for a lawsuit are far worse. So I will say this one last time: cancel my service immediately."

    4. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I actually don't see what would be wrong with just doing 5 jumping jacks like the checkout person asked.

      Like, it's a drop dead easy , and there is no good reason to not stay in shape.

    5. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Dins · · Score: 1

      But did you LISTEN to the audio...? I don't think a jury in the world would convict him.

      (yes, i'm kdding, but hot damn that was awful)

    6. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually don't see what would be wrong with just explaining that you didn't feel that the service was a good value, and that you feel they don't display respect for their customers.

      There's nothing wrong with doing that. There's also nothing wrong with not doing it.

      Like, it's a drop dead easy question,

      Doesn't matter. Just because a question is easy doesn't obligate you to answer.

      and there is no good reason to keep that private.

      It's a personal decision. Any reason to keep it private is a good one.

    7. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      A lot of bank are now asking you questions when you withdraw a larger amount of $$$. They claim its the gummint making them... IF for some reason, I still did business with banks, my reasons would be "Nunya Bidness"... Thankfully, all of my accounts are (and have been for years) in a local credit union... Banks can kiss my a$$....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    8. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Try something out of left field that they're unlikely to have an answer for (from marketing, anyway.)

      "I'm opposed to Comcast's position on net neutrality" would be a good one. You can kinda feel good making it, and they're not going to add long drawn out political positions to their anti-churn script.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or I'd have hung up before I threw the phone, and called back to talk to someone else.

      I think that was pretty much the point: have the cancellation of service be on the tab of a different support person.

    10. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Like, it's a drop dead easy question, and there is no good reason to keep that private.

      Are you the Comcast rep in the recording?

    11. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      I actually don't see what would be wrong with just explaining that you didn't feel that the service was a good value, and that you feel they don't display respect for their customers.

      What's wrong with it is that it opens a time-wasting conversation that doesn't need to happen. Comcast doesn't care why you're dropping, they just use the question as a ploy to engage you so they can give you a sales pitch.

    12. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually don't see what would be wrong with just explaining that you didn't feel that the service was a good value, and that you feel they don't display respect for their customers.

      Like, it's a drop dead easy question, and there is no good reason to keep that private.

      If you actually visit the soundcloud page, he explains that the call starts 10 minutes into it and they tried that already. The rep wouldn't accept the answers and they gave up trying.

      From the page:

      This recording picks up roughly 10 minutes into the call, whereby she and I have already played along and given a myriad of reasons and explanations as to why we are canceling (which is why I simply stopped answering the rep's repeated question -- it was clear the only sufficient answer was "Okay, please don't disconnect our service after all.").

    13. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you continue to refuse to cancel my service, I will be forced to take legal action. This call is being recorded and may be used as evidence. I don't know how bad your employers penalties are for letting a customer leave, but I imagine the penalties for giving a customer grounds for a lawsuit are far worse. So I will say this one last time: cancel my service immediately."

      "Okay, I've started to cancel your service. Our computers have been a little slow today. While we wait, could you tell me is there something we could be doing to keep other customers like you using our service?"

      I believe it was Earthlink that tried the "slow computer" trick on me.

    14. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Chas · · Score: 1

      No. Those really ARE government regulations.

      It's a 1970 Anti Money Laundering act known as the Bank Secrecy Act.

      Any sums $10,000 or greater must be reported by the bank.
      This includes aggregate withdrawals.

      So, if you withdraw $5K from one branch, then head to another branch, and withdraw another $5K, it triggers a report to the IRS.

      Additionally, banks must ALSO report on transactions they believe were designed to skirt the withdrawal limit. Such as $9,999 or $9,990.

      The only time there's any skirting of this rule is for establishments that regularly deal with large sums of cash. Such as stores that regularly withdraw money for deposits in excess of the limit.
      In those cases, there's paperwork the banks fill out to establish a reporting exemption with the IRS for these transactions. Said exemption needs to be renewed every year.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    15. Re:Had to stop after a minute... by Chas · · Score: 1

      Not over some ISP account. Over that sort of rude, obsequious just ASININE treatment.

      You act like that to someone's face, you're getting an ass-whupping.

      You do it over the phone, you better hope like HELL they can't identify/track you in any way, shape or form.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  15. Same business model, different business by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Exactly like the slimeball "sales manager" at a car dealership who tries to sell you the extended warranty and other overpriced crap after you've agreed to a price. He demands that you justify your refusal, because he knows that if he can get you on the defensive, he can bully you into submission.

    I once tore up a negotiated deal in front of one of those. That wouldn't work in this case, because this customer was already cancelling service, but it might be fun to say "Why I'm cancelling is none of your damned business. I will pay no more bills. Remember when your robot told me this call would be recorded?"

    1. Re:Same business model, different business by manquer · · Score: 1
      I find a standard answer works everytime when it comes to this sort of deals.

      I am broke / I have only this much cash / I cannot afford it despite your "attractive" financing / My wife/girlfriend/partner won't allow me to..

    2. Re:Same business model, different business by gman003 · · Score: 5, Funny

      But that's boring. There's so many more fun responses you could give. CSRs don't argue as much with "crazy" customers so it even makes things easier for you (plus, it messes with their statistics).
      "That information is classified."
      "The stars are in alignment. The prophecy must be fulfilled."
      "I'm moving to Elbonia."
      "The NASCAR team you sponsored keeps losing, so I'm switching to a winner like AOL."
      "I got assigned an IP ending in .666. I refuse to support any company with such obvious anti-christian leanings."
      "I finished reading the whole internet, I really don't see any point in keeping it once I've read it all."

    3. Re:Same business model, different business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find a different standard answer works even better. Turn and walk away, taking and ripping up anything you might've already signed before the abusive behavior begins. If that requires causing physical harm to the salesman to do so, act without guilt.

    4. Re:Same business model, different business by Dins · · Score: 1

      ... it might be fun to say "Why I'm cancelling is none of your damned business."

      He did actually say that. Repeatedly. If you haven't listened to the audio give it a try. Bet you can't make it through the whole 8 minutes. I got pissed off beyond belief after about 2.

    5. Re:Same business model, different business by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I got assigned an IP ending in .666. I refuse to support any company with such obvious anti-christian leanings."

      Brilliant.

    6. Re:Same business model, different business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly like the slimeball "sales manager" at a car dealership who tries to sell you the extended warranty and other overpriced crap after you've agreed to a price. He demands that you justify your refusal, because he knows that if he can get you on the defensive, he can bully you into submission.

      Actually, that one is easy to handle, if you have the right credit score and you are making the purchase with cash: tell them that you will take the car as is with no adds or deletes and that is final. If they continue to press the point, walk away. Their manager will be mighty pissed if they allow cash to walk out the door because the deal fell through at the end over an extended warranty.

      I once tore up a negotiated deal in front of one of those. That wouldn't work in this case, because this customer was already cancelling service, but it might be fun to say "Why I'm cancelling is none of your damned business. I will pay no more bills. Remember when your robot told me this call would be recorded?"

      When I dropped Comcast I was asked the standard "but why?" question. I just told them that I was no longer needing their service and left it at that. I guess my answer did not fit into their canned spiel, except perhaps under "other". It's not my job to clue them in one why people are fleeing from their crappy service and I certainly don't feel obligated to debate them on my reasons for leaving.

    7. Re:Same business model, different business by billstewart · · Score: 1

      Last time I went to buy a car, I got an offer from the weekend sales manager at one dealer*, but told them I was going to check with several other dealers for the same brand to see what they had in inventory. (It was September, and the cars from the new model year were trickling in randomly.) Came back the next day to buy the car, and the weekday sales manager said he couldn't sell it to me at that price, wanted $500 more. I told him no, we had a deal. He said, ok, then, I can sell it to you at that price if you buy this extra crap. Nope. Ok, then, let me see what I can do, goes in the back, comes back with a contract that has a different $500 of extra crap in it. I walked. Went over to the other dealer, spent $500 less for a car with $500 less in options (some of which I had actually wanted), so they ended up with about $200-300 less in profit and were happy to sell it to me.

      *Premier Kia/Nissan/Etc. in Fremont, if you're in the San Francisco Bay Area. A year later they sent me an email advertising a big sale on cars, and I pointed out that I already had a new car of the brand they sell, and that not only would I not buy another car from them, if my car breaks down right in front of their shop I'll have AAA tow it somewhere else to get fixed. Six months later they sent me another email :-) Next time I'll have to check whether the US CAN-SPAM law or the California anti-spam laws still let me sue them for $500 in small claims court, like they did for a while.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    8. Re:Same business model, different business by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      it might be fun to say "Why I'm cancelling is none of your damned business. I will pay no more bills. Remember when your robot told me this call would be recorded?"

      That's way too polite. I've once told a Comcast rep something to the effect of the following:

      Me: "the answer to your question is 'because I said so'. I am not obligated to give a reason; however, you ARE obligated to accept my response and do what I'm telling you to do. Now, do what I asked you to do and DO NOT ask me the question or any similar question again! Do you understand?

      Rep: "But..."

      Me (interrupting): "Do you understand?"

      Rep: "But..."

      Me (interrupting): "DO YOU UNDERSTAND, YES OR NO?"

      Rep: "Yes, but..."

      Me (interrupting): "DO NOT ASK THE QUESTION AGAIN!"

      Rep: "...ok"

      This is the way that anyone who has gone through Comcast's training and still consents to work there deserves to be treated. If I manage to torment the rep to the point that he reconsiders his choice of vocation, I consider myself to have done him a service!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Same business model, different business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's boring. There's so many more fun responses you could give. CSRs don't argue as much with "crazy" customers so it even makes things easier for you (plus, it messes with their statistics).
      "That information is classified."
      "The stars are in alignment. The prophecy must be fulfilled."
      "I'm moving to Elbonia."
      "The NASCAR team you sponsored keeps losing, so I'm switching to a winner like AOL."
      "I got assigned an IP ending in .666. I refuse to support any company with such obvious anti-christian leanings."
      "I finished reading the whole internet, I really don't see any point in keeping it once I've read it all."

      If my IP address had 666 anywhere in it, I'd be worried too. Anything over 255, actually.

    10. Re:Same business model, different business by pz · · Score: 1

      "The little yellow rabbits with the red eyes told me to cancel. There are so many of them here now."
      "I need to tie up some loose ends before heading over to the Comcast office with my AK-47."
      Switch to German. If the CSR speaks German, switch to French. Then Portuguese. Russian. Greek. Etc.
      "Oh, that's really interesting, please tell me more [wait for reply] REALLY? That's so interesting. Please tell me more. [wait for reply] I didn't quite understand that, could you repeat it? ..."
      "Zorg said it must be done."
      "The CIA keeps sneaking into my house through the Internets to read my mind while I sleep."
      "What did you say your name was? [type, type, type] OK, then, I've updated your Facebook page for you. Hope you like the new photos -- boy that sex toy sure is big!"
      "Oh, can you wait a sec? There's someone at the door." [leave phone on table by loud, badly tuned radio, and walk away for a good 40 minutes]
      Go to the bathroom and make appropriate noises as if defecating with some difficulty and repeatedly flushing, but continue to hold the conversation.
      Hand the phone to your 5 year old.
      Aim an air horn at the microphone.
      "Each time I try to move the cable box, the electrons keep spilling out."
      "When I use the Internet at my friend's house, it's OK, but at my house, all the photos are upside down."
      "I need to spend more special time with my hamster."
      "I'm dead."
      "I've just had enough of the sparks."
      "It interferes with my hair dryer."
      "This chick said she'd sleep with me if I cancel my cable."
      "The Internet is too big."

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    11. Re:Same business model, different business by gman003 · · Score: 1

      That's part of the joke. If they're able to catch it, you get even more fun - accuse them of switching to IPv5, on the logic that IPv6 uses hexadecimal but 666 won't fit into IPv4, so it has to be whatever's in between.

    12. Re:Same business model, different business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more ways to represent ipv(4) than as 4 octets separated by dots. 39.188.134.170 == 666666666

    13. Re:Same business model, different business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm moving to Elbonia."

      I had trouble disconnecting my service with them when I told them I was moving out of the country, and I actually was. They tried to get me to keep it so it would "be easier for me when I came back in a few years". That seems like a reasonable decision--to pay a hundred-plus dollars a month for a service I am physically not able to use.

    14. Re:Same business model, different business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually an ip address would never have an ordinal higher than 255

    15. Re:Same business model, different business by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to the experience I had when shopping for my current car. On dealer has what from the picture appeared to be a nice E46 330ci with a manual transmission and the asking prices was in the range for what should be immaculate vehicle. So I go to check it out and the vehicle was off at the shop next door being serviced and I was told that I could wait about 10 minutes and then check it out. After the little wait the guy goes and gets the car and pull up in it. There isn't a single piece of trim that is lined up correctly on this car. At this point I am informed that it pops out of 3rd, but not to worry because "this is a common problem on these cars" and am asked if I would like to take it for a test drive which I do. On the drive it does pop out of third, but there is noise coming from both front wheels indicating bad bearings, lots of suspension rattles, clunks from the differential when shifting, and the VANOS makes the whistling noise indicating that it is fairly far along in the process of failing. I got done with the test drive and the guy ask what I thought of the car to which I responded "It's a piece of junk". The next question was what is wrong with it so I responded with the list. The rest of the conversation went:

      Salesman: Well what would it take to get you in this car?"
      Me: $3000 and a new transmission installed
      Salesman: I paid more than that for it.
      Me: Not my problem that you bought a piece of crap. You are asking a pristine vehicle price for this car and even paying $3000 for it with a new transmission it would still cost me at least $6000 in parts to fix everything that I know is wrong with this car and who know what else I will find when I get into it. This car had a very hard life and was not maintained at all, I have walked away from much nicer vehicles.(I then proceed to walk off)

      I'm sure I found some young sucker to buy that car since it was a black 2 door BMW who couldn't see anything beyond that but that isn't my problem either.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    16. Re:Same business model, different business by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      "Say But again! I dare you!"

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    17. Re:Same business model, different business by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I know that. That's WHY it its brilliant.

    18. Re:Same business model, different business by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If they know the bounds of IPv6 addressing, they'll be somewhat likely to know that IPv5 used the same addressing as IPv4.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...

    19. Re:Same business model, different business by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Car dealers are the worst. I once left a message asking for a quote on a repair. They never called me back....until they tried to sell me a car 6 months later.

    20. Re:Same business model, different business by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I filled out a "give me a quote" form on a web site that appeared to exist explicitly to quote prices on new models of cars. The follow-up email was a long string of "we've got this that and everything come in and I'll show you around." Not those literal words, but the lack of punctuation is accurate, as is the complete unawareness of the question I asked. I responded with "I asked for a specific quote for a specific model of car" and restated what I wanted. His follow-up email was again jumbled and boiled down to "we have that model, come in or call".

      At that point I gave up trying to talk to the guy. If they can't respond to a simple question in a reasonable fashion, I'm not going to try to actually do a large financial transaction with them.

  16. ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been telling my friends and neighbors about dumping cable and just streaming and using bunny ears for TV - and the only way to get REAL HDTV is by antennae, btw.

    EVERY single one says something like "But I love my sports!" - read, I love ESPN.

    I solved that problem: the networks rebroadcast many things and I got off my ass and actually DO sports and lost a bit of weight doing it too.

    And when it comes to many sports - like tennis and softball - you meet single (fit) women or women who have single friends.

    Cable is one of the biggest money wasting ripoffs in our society.

    1. Re:ESPN by alen · · Score: 1

      i like sports too, but hate ESPN since it's mostly college sports which i don't follow

      but the NY Yankees and Mets suck this year. the knicks will suck for years to come. Nets are so so. same with the Giants.

      only reason i'm paying is i'm on a bundle and i ran the numbers and it's cheaper than buying a la carte cartoons for my kids that netflix doesn't have

    2. Re:ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and the only way to get REAL HDTV is by antennae, btw.

      Explain this one, I don't get it.

    3. Re:ESPN by beltsbear · · Score: 2

      In an area with good over the air reception the signal is not compressed heavily as it is over cable. Here, Comcast is the worst, followed by the satellite services. FIOS has the least compression but I still see it on some fast moving stuff.

      Over the air can be as good (to me) as BluRay.

    4. Re: ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because comcast and the like compress the HD, where as OTA and C Band arent jacked up like what the cable co's etc do.
      I tested it with plain old rabbit ears vs comcast. Both were "HD" of a college football game off the local ABC affiliate. The OTA was sharper with less artifacts and what appeared to better colors

    5. Re:ESPN by substance2003 · · Score: 1

      I think he means that Over the air (OTA) broadcast is a pure uncompressed signal of HDTV 1080i quality. The cable company has to compress the signal to get so many channels to get to the subscriber. Some feel there is a loss in quality vs OTA but depending on who you talk to it's not something people will notice.

    6. Re:ESPN by kheldan · · Score: 2

      Explain this one, I don't get it.

      It's the dirty little secret of cable TV: Pixel resolution and compression are two different things. You may be getting a channel in 1080, but by the time a cable company delivers it to your TV, it's be recompressed so much that it being 1080 doesn't matter anymore. You see it most when things in the picture are moving, they get blocky, and in aliasing around things like text on the screen. They do this to fit more channels into the available bandwidth of their network. Over-the-air from local stations isn't recompressed within an inch of it's life; you're getting the highest quality you can get that way short of having an actual digital copy of a program physically sent to you on some sort of storage medium. I suspect that satellite TV compresses the hell out of things, too, for the same reason: fit more channels into the available bandwidth, so they can make more money. Try paying attention to all this the next time you're watching cable or satellite, you'll notice the compression artifacts. Sorry in advance for ruining it for you, BTW. Then go watch TV where it's using an antenna for OTA broadcasts, you'll see the difference.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    7. Re:ESPN by alen · · Score: 1

      it's not a problem where they got rid of the analog channels on cable like time warner in NYC. as soon as time warner got rid of the analog channels they got more bandwidth for internet service and the picture quality is better now

    8. Re:ESPN by devjoe · · Score: 2

      About 4 or 5 years ago, all the broadcast TV in the US changed over to a digital format, and the digital format includes HDTV broadcasts. If you have an HDTV and an antenna, and you live in a place where you can receive the signals, you can get the HDTV of all the broadcast networks over the air (OTA) with no cable.

      It has been reported that Comcast re-compresses the digital HDTV streams, cramming them into a smaller digital channel in their cable system, in order to fit more channels in. This leads to reduced quality in the picture you view on Comcast compared to the OTA HDTV broadcast. I don't know about other cable systems. Here is one such report, though it seems to be specifically about other non-OTA HD channels (where the FIOS broadcast was used for comparison).

    9. Re:ESPN by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I play hockey. I also like to watch hockey. I don't live near Canada.

      Please explain how you'll solve my problem.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:ESPN by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Cable services re-compress signals in order to cram more channels into whatever transmission capacity they have. Sometimes they even monkey around with the size of the frame. This is all to save space/bandwidth.

      What you get off of an antenna is the pristine version of whatever that broadcaster sent out.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:ESPN by praxis · · Score: 1

      Back when I last had Comcast (around 2005 or 2006) the quality of PBS over the cable was so much worse than OTA. It was full of compression artefacts, dropped frames, audio distortion. I called them several times and they always told me their digital picture was perfect. It got even worse when they increased their compression ratio to up their cable modem bandwidth (I never used their internet service, I used DSL because Comcast didn't want to sell me service with a static IP and unfiltered ports) so it was a net loss for me and was the last straw. I cut the cord a week after they rolled out their faster internet service I wasn't using which made my television unwatchable.

    12. Re:ESPN by praxis · · Score: 1

      Would going to a hockey rink and watching people play solve your problem or is your problem more specific than "I also like to watch hockey?"

    13. Re: ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NHL GameCentre Live, still cheaper the cable.

    14. Re:ESPN by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      I think he means that Over the air (OTA) broadcast is a pure uncompressed signal of HDTV 1080i quality. The cable company has to compress the signal to get so many channels to get to the subscriber. Some feel there is a loss in quality vs OTA but depending on who you talk to it's not something people will notice.

      No, OTA is also compressed video (you have to compress it).

      It's just that in a 6MHz channel, most OTA stations only broadcast one channel, so it gets the full 20Mbps available of that channel.

      In a cable system, each 6MHz channel also gives around 20Mbps. however, instead of just having one channel take the entire bandwidth, they squeeze in three, four or more HD channels in that slot, so they get 6, 5 or less Mbps each. Even more now that they're switching to h.264 on a bunch of channels.

      This results in much over compression as there just aren't enough bits left so picture quality degrades.

    15. Re:ESPN by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It's just that in a 6MHz channel, most OTA stations only broadcast one channel, so it gets the full 20Mbps available of that channel.

      Every OTA in this area that I know of has at least two, and usually three, streams on one channel. Why wouldn't they? With relatively moderate compression the bandwidth becomes free and they can charge advertisers double or more.

      In a cable system, each 6MHz channel also gives around 20Mbps. however, instead of just having one channel take the entire bandwidth, they squeeze in three, four or more HD channels in that slot, so they get 6, 5 or less Mbps each.

      I've seen typically 2 or three HD per "channel", so they're doing as well as or better than most of the OTA.

    16. Re:ESPN by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Back when I last had Comcast (around 2005 or 2006) the quality of PBS over the cable was so much worse than OTA. It was full of compression artefacts, dropped frames, audio distortion.

      In my area they can't even bother to get the aspect ratio correct for PBS! Unless you pay to rent a HD set-top-box, you end up with that channel being letterboxed (or maybe "windowboxed" -- I can't quite remember since I cut the cord months ago). The commercial channels, however, display in correct widescreen 480p; it's only the public station that Comcast doesn't give a shit about.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:ESPN by almitydave · · Score: 1

      Some feel there is a loss in quality vs OTA but depending on who you talk to it's not something people will notice.

      Comcast subscriber here, and I can definitely tell in some programs. There are certain types of scenes that the compression algorithm doesn't handle well at low bitrates, notably when there's a lot of detail changing from frame to frame. I was watching "Planet Earth" and when it showed a large flock of birds taking flight, the TV looked like a checkerboard pattern of flickering grey squares. So it's usually ok, but often noticeable, and occasionally ugly. I may hook up our old rabbit ears for the OTA channels.

      As for the customer service nightmare, I guess my experience has been anomalous, as I've never had a problem with them, even canceling TV service once or twice in the 6 years I've subscribed (TV+internet currently). I rarely have to call, though; service here in Chicago has been extremely reliable. It is very expensive, though.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    18. Re:ESPN by Entropius · · Score: 1

      They also oversharpen the shit out of it.

      The worst is grass, where the blades are close to the limiting resolution. The compression algorithm can't decide whether it's worth it or not to capture the detail in the grass blades, so you either get a smeary mess or holy shit oversharpened artifacts.

    19. Re:ESPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang out with Canadians in your city ... we have a way of figuring out how to play hockey and watch hockey in almost any location if we have to stay there for more than 6 months or more.

    20. Re:ESPN by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      You haven't priced NHL tickets lately, have you? Or hockey equipment/ice time/league fees.

      Cable's cheaper.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    21. Re:ESPN by evilviper · · Score: 1

      In a cable system, each 6MHz channel also gives around 20Mbps.

      No, thanks to the higher S/N ratio of cable versus OTA broadcasts, less error correction is needed, and much more aggressive and efficient modulation can be used that provides more bits per symbol. So in the same 6MHz, they might be able to fit 40Mbps of content, not just 20Mbps. See:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Cable companies still compress the video to hell and back, because 2X as many channels isn't good enough for them... They want MORE, MORE, MORE. It's so bad that 1080i broadcast over cable often looks worse than a 480i DVD.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:ESPN by Alioth · · Score: 1

      How do they get 40Mbps in a 6MHz channel? That sounds like it would be above the Shannon limit unless the SNR is ridiculously good.

    23. Re:ESPN by praxis · · Score: 1

      I did not realize you were specifically talking about the NHL, your original statement was more generic. One would think that telecasts would be cheaper as they can accommodate more people than a rink.

    24. Re:ESPN by omnichad · · Score: 1

      When I moved into my current apartment, I discovered that Charter forgot to install a TV filter. I compared two TV's side by side - one OTA and one cable. And the difference was like VHS vs. DVD. Even from 10 feet away you could easily see blurry macroblocking on the cable source, and virtually no artifacts on OTA. On top of that, the contrast was missing, so the signal probably went through some analog equipment before being re-compressed.

      OTA is compressed too, but you typically get one "main" virtual channel per real channel. PBS is one exception to that, but with NBC I get probably 15Mbps of picture quality on the main channel, and 1Mbps on the weather subchannel.

    25. Re:ESPN by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Cable usually has a very good SNR, but VSB is not used by cable - at least not without a cable box. The link they posted clearly says everyone's using QAM. And QAM-64 is going to put them at around 26Mbps.

    26. Re:ESPN by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I think it's worth restating. You will never get a better picture from cable than OTA. Cable uses the existing broadcast stream that already has compression artifacts - the best it can do is preserve that as-is, but that's not realistic.

    27. Re:ESPN by evilviper · · Score: 1

      QAM-64 is going to put them at around 26Mbps.

      But (like 16-VSB) QAM-256 will put them at around 38Mbps.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    28. Re:ESPN by evilviper · · Score: 1

      How do they get 40Mbps in a 6MHz channel? That sounds like it would be above the Shannon limit unless the SNR is ridiculously good.

      QAM-64 needs a SNR above 23, while QAM-256 needs a SNR above 28.

      Modern cable systems are fiber-optic to the neighborhood, and only there do they switch to coax for a relatively short distance, so the SNR is actually very high.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    29. Re:ESPN by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it will. Is QAM-256 in that wide of usage? That might explain why my cable Internet has been so flaky at times. There's a good bit of line noise where I'm at. I'll admit to not looking at my modem to see what modulation it's using.

    30. Re:ESPN by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I'm probably wrong - but a quick back of the envelope calculation would suggest the Shannon limit for a 6MHz channel with SNR of 28 would only be of the order of 20Mbit/sec

    31. Re:ESPN by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Is QAM-256 in that wide of usage?

      It seems to be. Not exactly a definitive study of the subject, but plenty of user reports out there, even from quite a few years back, saying QAM-256. And would you really doubt that cable companies will do anything to squeeze double the channels into the available space?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:ESPN by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I think it's great as long as they can keep the SNR in-margin. The problem is that at certain times of the year, my cable service is just plain unreliable - especially for VoIP - even when uncongested.

      I don't subscribe to TV, because they really overcram. I wish they were just using better QAM, but they're also overcompressing the channels on top of that.

    33. Re:ESPN by evilviper · · Score: 1

      a quick back of the envelope calculation would suggest the Shannon limit for a 6MHz channel with SNR of 28 would only be of the order of 20Mbit/sec

      Quick and dirty... I get ~48Mbit/sec.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  17. ...and by SeNtM · · Score: 1

    ...and a free month of service. Just call to cancel if you don't wish to continue.

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom." -George W. Bush
  18. They must pressure their reps to act this way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to believe the customer service rep acted in this way simply because he wanted to.

    It's far more likely Comcast phone reps in charge of customer retention have some sort of quota or other incentive that all but compels them to speak with people in such a belligerent fashion.

    I'm sure the poor rep was fighting for his livelihood, why else would he so aggressively press the customer to stay with Comcast?

  19. It changes nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They apologized, but have they changed the script they give their customer service reps to follow.

  20. Same thing happened to me by richard4507 · · Score: 1

    Where is my apology and when is comcast going to re-sod my lawn?

  21. It's very simple: by kheldan · · Score: 3, Informative

    You don't have to 'explain' a goddamn thing to them or anyone else, and you damn well TELL them that. You are paying them, not the other way around, and if you want to cancel your service with them or anyone else for that matter, it's not their place to badger you or bully you. Being asked, once, politely, why you're unhappy enough to cancel is one thing, but if you don't wish to explain why then they MUST accept that. Arguing, bullying, badgering, or any other hard-sell tactics, is just plain bullshit. Anyone gives you that kind of guff? You tell them you want to speak to their supervisor, RIGHT NOW, and YOU don't take 'no' for an answer, either. Their supervisor is being a hardass about it, too? Go over their head. And so on. The only way you get shithead companies like Comcast to knock it off is to not sit back and take shit from them.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  22. Just move by BigT · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had little or no problem cancelling Comcast recently when I moved. I used the phrase "moving out of the Comcast service area" when they asked why I was cancelling, and they put it right through. Had a little more trouble returning their boxes, however.

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
    1. Re:Just move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    2. Re:Just move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, or say you're moving out of the country. I've used this and it skips the entire script their call center has for users wanting to leave for the competition.

      This method also works well for most other services. It's a quick no-more-questions method of terminating any service. I've canceled phone, cable, etc this way since the first time I did it for the actual reason of moving out of the country.

    3. Re:Just move by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience! Them idiots sent me 2 boxes to return 4 items, with 1 shipping label.. Asked them many times to send me labels and boxes, but they said they couldn't. Many harassing calls saying I owed them money. Finally someone called me asking me why I hadn't returned the equipment and managed to get me what I needed. Almost. One shipping label short, but I shoved everything in 1 box and was done with it.

    4. Re:Just move by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      When I moved to a new city, I had to cancel my newspaper subscription. When they asked why, I told that I was moving out of their delivery area.

      They immediately added me to their telemarketing list, calling from all sorts of questionable numbers, completely oblivious to the fact that I would not be able to accept any offers they could give me.

  23. This is why you tell them you're moving abroad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to get rid of your service quickly:

    1. Pick a country where you know they have no service (typically something like Sweden or Finland are great, since very few multinational US companies operate there...)

    2. Call the customer service and tell them you're moving to the country you chose in (1), because you got a permanent job there. To sound convincing, tell them that you don't have a permanent address there yet and are temporarily going to stay at a hotel. Ask them for a confirmation number that you owe them nothing. If they can't do that tell them to write on your file that any bills they send must be e-mailed to you.

    3. Watch them cancel your service no question asked.

    I've moved out of the US twice and each time I've been able to cancel all of my services in less than two minutes after I managed to get through the wait when calling them.

  24. And so the pot calls the kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An AOL exec eats his own dog food.

  25. Great time to call to reduce my monthly bill by gunner_von_diamond · · Score: 1

    Normally threatening to cancel always results in a lower bill, but man, after hearing that, I should be able to really get a low rate! All the reps probably have a quota per day of how many people they can turn around from wanting to cancel. We can use that to our advantage!

    1. Re:Great time to call to reduce my monthly bill by Dins · · Score: 1

      That 8 minutes of audio was brutal to listen to. But that aside, yeah, my wife used to call Charter every year and say we're canceling because we're switching to ADSL. We weren't, but they reduced our rates for another year like clockwork. Next year when the rates went back up again, lather, rinse, repeat.

    2. Re:Great time to call to reduce my monthly bill by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Service providers are getting wise to that trick and cutting back on reductions for people claiming they're canceling.

  26. Ha! by armahillo · · Score: 2

    Does anyone else remember the AOL Cancellation video from years ago? I just now noticed that it was an AOL person trying to cancel their account. COMEUPPANCE.

  27. Maybe they issued an apology, but if they fired by spads · · Score: 1

    this customer service rep, I would eat my hat! :)

    --
    Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
    1. Re:Maybe they issued an apology, but if they fired by Falos · · Score: 1

      If they think it'll be good damage-control publicity, they will. The only thing more disposable than him (probably tier-2 retention) is the tier-1 slaves.

    2. Re:Maybe they issued an apology, but if they fired by Dins · · Score: 1

      They probably publicly reprimanded him, then privately promoted him...

  28. Corporate doublespeak by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We are very embarrassed by the way our employee spoke with Mr. Block and are contacting him to personally apologize. The way in which our representative communicated with him is unacceptable and not consistent with how we train our customer service representatives. We are investigating this situation and will take quick action. While the overwhelming majority of our employees work very hard to do the right thing every day, we are using this very unfortunate experience to reinforce how important it is to always treat our customers with the utmost respect.

    If you read this carefully, they aren't sorry for the content, merely the delivery.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Corporate doublespeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think the last thing this guy wants is to get another phone call from fucking comcast.
      My solution to this BS is usually to just say I'm moving somewhere were the service doesn't exist.

    2. Re:Corporate doublespeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read it carefully, there is no apology. They're "embarrassed" about this "unfortunate experience" and they're contacting Mr. Block to apologize. The apology to Mr. Block will go something like this: "Sir, we are sorry that rep was mean to you. Is there anything we can do to make it up to you? How would you like the Comcast complete business package for the family package price? It is really quite a good deal...."

    3. Re:Corporate doublespeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup! Public Relations dept. was all over this response.

      And why wouldn't they be. They're probably paid really well!

  29. My experience cancelling AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in the early 2000s because they had trouble porting my phone number from T-mobile. Anyways, customer service representative didn't take no for an answer for like 15 minutes even though I agreed to pay the early cancellation fee. The 2G phone didn't work right. The customer service representative was like: "Are you sure you want to cancel your service? The computer is down. It should be back up in a few days." I said, "Yes, cancel my service and bill me for this month." Then she asked me what was wrong with the phone service. Uh.. I already told her that the phone doesn't work right because I can't call in or out with AT&T. The number porting didn't work right. x.x I think she is hard of hearing or something.

    I eventually stayed with T-Mobile and kept my phone number. But AT&T had better reception back in the 2000s where I live. Reception is still kinda spotty with T-Mobile. Maybe I'll switch to Verizon.

    I still have that $99 2G AT&T phone but the battery is nearly useless. Maybe I'll recycle it some how.

    Yeah, kinda off topic but I wanted to share my experience.

  30. Once the user cancels, you have lost by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Companies don't want to hear this, but that's just the way it is. People are lazy. They don't go around and call you to fake-cancel their accounts hoping to get a better rate. The few that do are well known and blacklisted. So when a long time customer calls you and cancels, you might want to test the waters and ask for a reason, maybe he got a better deal that you can still beat (though if you did that with me, my reaction would be to cancel on principle because you ripped me off all the time, if you can lower your rate now, why couldn't you before? And I certainly have zero reason to continue business with a company that very obviously has no problem with ripping me off). But that's pretty much all you could possibly do.

    If you continue afterwards, be prepared for abuse. It is actually amazing how civil the person remains. "This is a simple yes or no question, even a monkey can answer that so I'm kinda hoping you could as well: Can you cancel my service? Yes or no. No other option available. CAN. YOU. CANCEL. MY. SERVICE?"

    Every answer besides yes or no will be met with verbal abuse, followed by the repetition of the question.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually amazing how civil the person remains. "This is a simple yes or no question, even a monkey can answer that so I'm kinda hoping you could as well: Can you cancel my service? Yes or no. No other option available. CAN. YOU. CANCEL. MY. SERVICE?"

      This, of course, has nothing to do with him knowing that he was recording this call and was supposed to publish it on the internet?

    2. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      (though if you did that with me, my reaction would be to cancel on principle because you ripped me off all the time, if you can lower your rate now, why couldn't you before? And I certainly have zero reason to continue business with a company that very obviously has no problem with ripping me off)

      Presumably, if you're paying a particular rate in exchange for service, that's because you believe that the service has at least that much value to you. As long as that's the case, then the company providing the service isn't "ripping you off."

      As a customer, there's going to be some upper limit to how much you're willing to pay for a service. For the company, there's some lower limit to the price that they can afford to offer. Obviously every customer would like the price to be set at that lower limit -- so skewed as much in the customer's favor as possible -- but it's not unethical for the company to set their pricing elsewhere.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by Dins · · Score: 1

      People are lazy. They don't go around and call you to fake-cancel their accounts hoping to get a better rate.

      We used to do exactly that with Charter every year. Worked like clockwork.

    4. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2

      They don't go around and call you to fake-cancel their accounts hoping to get a better rate. The few that do are well known and blacklisted.

      I looked around for a bit, and couldn't find a source for this. Mind providing one?

    5. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Presumably, if you're paying a particular rate in exchange for service, that's because you believe that the service has at least that much value to you. As long as that's the case, then the company providing the service isn't "ripping you off."

      This argument might make some sense if we're talking about a business where there's something like competition. However, at least where I live, there isn't. If you want broadband internet, your choice is Comcast, Comcast, or Comcast. In that situation, Comcast is absolutely ripping me off by charging an absurdly high rate (not to mention using my money in order to effect legislation that is harmful to the internet) even though I continue to do business with them. The alternative is to not have broadband at all -- which isn't an option for me.

      Fortunately, I'm moving soon to an area where I'll have another option. And I'll take that other option.

    6. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      The alternative is to not have broadband at all -- which isn't an option for me.

      In other words, you value having broadband very highly.

      I don't blame you for wishing prices were lower, but there's nothing unethical about a company charging what you're willing to pay.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    7. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To sum up Libertarians. The monopolies are righteous angels for setting their prices as high as possible, the customers are simply lazy subhuman garbage for wanting a lower rate.

    8. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sum up" does not mean "make up a strawman".

    9. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope. I hate assholes on principle.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Once the user cancels, you have lost by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No. In other words, the market is distorted by the existence of a government-sanctioned monopoly, so the normal rules of supply and demand DO NOT APPLY.

      What is unethical is that Comcast has BRIBED the government to enshrine themselves in a privileged position, where the threat of physical violence is used to support their business model. For example, if I attempted to run cable down the street in order to compete with Comcast, men brandishing legal authority and firearms (i.e., the police) would come and physically restrain me from doing so.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  31. Re:they don't give a fuck by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was thinking more along the lines of ...

    . /Oblg. South Park - Cable Company

  32. Easy technique ... by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

    Just stop paying the damn bill. Eventually, it will be terminated and then you get a bill. Pay the bill and do not look back.

    1. Re:Easy technique ... by Dins · · Score: 1

      That's fine unless they report you to a credit agency. Yeah, you could clear yourself of that, but it would be a PITA.

    2. Re:Easy technique ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dirty little secret of credit is that you can just ignore it all and it goes away. At least in the US.

    3. Re:Easy technique ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That's fine unless they report you to a credit agency. Yeah, you could clear yourself of that, but it would be a PITA.

      Only time can clear you of it. The most you can do is put a protest letter in your file, which everybody will ignore. Everybody who accesses your credit report plans on behaving just like Comcast did in this call anyway, so the fact that you stood up to them is hardly going to inspire them to give you a nice deal.

  33. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am i leaving your service..... a 50Megabit plan with a ping that would make a 14.4 boca proud.

  34. Lots of angry customers today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast's main web page has a link to the "Comcast Customer Guarantee". That page implies that they're trying hard to serve their customers well.

    But look at the "Help and Support Forums" web page. Lots of angry customers today (July 15).

  35. AOL isn't much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did a free trial of AOL's music service 10 years ago. I spent longer than 8 minutes talking to the customer service rep to the point I was screaming at me to cancel my service. It wasn't until I said "Put me through to your supervisor right now" that he went through with the cancel.

  36. Burn in Hell by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    Comcast can burn in hell. I really really hope the merger with TWC is blocked.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Burn in Hell by Dins · · Score: 1

      Being a current Time Warner subscriber, all I have to say is: Holy shit, me too! Time Warner isn't a whole lot better, but they are a little, IMO.

    2. Re:Burn in Hell by gewalker · · Score: 1

      But if the merger goes through, I get divested out of ComCast.

      On the one hand, expletive of choice Comcast

      On the other hand, expletive of choice, no more Comcast, woot!

      Clearly my loyalties are divided on this issue.

    3. Re:Burn in Hell by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Comcast is buying Time Warner, not the other way around.
      No one is getting away from Comcast with that deal, quite the opposite actually

    4. Re:Burn in Hell by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Under the proposed terms of the merger, the combined Comcast / Time Warner will divest themselves of some of their users due to anti trust concerns. I am in that group to be divested.

  37. Customer service in a nutshell. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

    Imagine Customer Service as the Early Space Program.

    You have Astronauts and you have Monkeys.

    Astronauts have problem solving skills that can ultimately sink or swim a mission. They hear orders from mission control but can offer suggestions or even take direct action based on spacecraft feedback if necessary for overall success. They're the guys you send to the moon and back to get moon rocks.

    Monkeys see a red light on a console initiated from mission control, which corresponds with pressing a red button on the console. If they press the red button when the red light is on, they get a banana. if they press the button when the light is off, or press any other button when not instructed to, they get shocked. This continues with multiple lights corresponding to multiple buttons to get the desired result. In no way does the monkey have any say so in the control of the spacecraft lest he gets shocked.

    Most CSR tier 1 centers consists of Monkeys. The keyword to tell is if you hear "I'm sorry" or "Thank you" a lot. They're saying that cause their screen says to say it. Usually a robot like script reading session follows the keywords. the "Shock or Banana" is the Feedback call / Survey you get after calling one of these CSR's. you vote 1 he gets schocked (fired) and if you vote 10 he gets a banana (paycheck)

    CSR tier 2's Still have monkeys but a Astronaut may be lurking around somewhere. The Astronaut is going to sound like a normal human being. he may converse with you outside of the issue at hand. he may skip a few steps to get to the actual problem if he feels that he can without causing issues. This is who you dream of as a CSR. A human with real problem solving skills.

    Tier 3 Consists of mostly astronauts. Getting here takes some time but it's your best bet to get your issue resolved.

    Just Remember that you have to go through the Zoo first before you can get to NASA.

  38. Shouldn't need to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't need to say anything.

  39. Easiest way to cancel service from any ISP... by thevirtualcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Me: "Hi, I need to cancel my service."
    Rep: "Oh? [insert marketing speak that boils down to 'Why do you want to cancel our awesome service?']"
    Me: "I'm moving out of your service area and I'm already set up in my new place."
    Rep: "Oh. Okay then."

    Doesn't matter if it's true or not. There's not really much they can say to that. They might fish for details about where you've moved to. Just don't be stupid enough to bite.

    1. Re:Easiest way to cancel service from any ISP... by harl · · Score: 1

      If they fish for details simply ask if they provide service in random foreign country.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    2. Re:Easiest way to cancel service from any ISP... by ledow · · Score: 2

      You shouldn't have to lie to cancel service.

      Why do you want to cancel?
      Because I fucking do.

      But why?
      Because you shits don't get that when a customer wants to cancel, you cancel.

      But why?
      This is your official notice that I've cancelled. I've recorded it. Send me a bill for anything past and I'll take you to court.
      Goodbye.

    3. Re:Easiest way to cancel service from any ISP... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sometimes helps to let them think you'll re-subscribe in the future. Ie, you're being deployed to Afghanistan for 6 months, or you're relocated temporarily to the Residence Inn in another state (tell them it's New Mexico and they'll think it's a foreign country). Or claim you're getting a divorce.

      Don't just say you're moving though. Many of these cable and satellite companies have relocation plans, and they'll try to sell you on their IP phone service, bundles, etc.

      Remember, you're not calling customer service when you cancel, you're really calling the sales department which is disguised as customer service.

    4. Re:Easiest way to cancel service from any ISP... by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

      Oh, they tried the "relocation plan" on me.

      Me: "Your service isn't available where I'm going and I don't have your phone service, so that really wouldn't help me at all."
      Rep: "Oh. Okay."

      If you do have the phone service:
      Me: "Sorry, My new provider is wireless and disallows competing IP phone services on their network."
      (You'll probably make the rep insanely jealous when you say that...)

      Sometimes, after it's all said and done, they want a forwarding address to send the final bill.

      Rep: "We offer service in that area, though."
      Me: "Yeah, but the complex I'm moving into has an exclusivity agreement with [provider that's not them]."
      Alternatively, if it's a single-family home:
      Me: "I'm actually moving out the country and that's my grandmother's house. She doesn't need the internet for her typewriter or her rotary dial phone."

      But by the time they get to the "forward address for the final bill" question comes up, you've already cancelled and they're just fishing for a new sale.

    5. Re:Easiest way to cancel service from any ISP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't have to lie to cancel service.

      And you don't. But it's a lot faster if you do.

  40. A success story by Primate+Pete · · Score: 1

    When I needed to cancel Comcast a few years ago because I was moving to a new apartment, they wouldn't let me go without giving them a forwarding address, which I did not want to provide. (The bill was already paid in full.) The solution I finally found was to lie to them. I called and told them that I'd found Jesus, and he didn't want that filth in my house anymore. They let me cancel without complaint or argument.So there are two lessons here: (1) find an excuse they don't want to fight with, and (2) don't tell them you're moving unless you want them to stalk you.

  41. What I have done by midicase · · Score: 1

    Gather all the equipment up.
    Go the local service office at the busiest time of the day.
    Wait in line.
    Turn all the equipment in and cancel on the spot.

    The is no "customer retention service" there.

  42. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is bad, because it's Comcast's shitty service and policies that are causing the cancellations. The call center employees are being thrown under the bus when it's the policy-makers within the company that need to be shown the door.

  43. Poetic justice for an AOL employee? by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2

    In the last 15 years, AOL has been pulling the same thing on customers wanting to cancel their services. Hurts to wear the shoe on the other foot, eh?

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:Poetic justice for an AOL employee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised more people haven't pointed this out.

      Bet you the Comcast employee knew he had an AOL management employee on the line.

  44. Not just Comcast by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    I cancelled XM a while back and the rep kept trying to get me to stay with various free offers. He kept asking "Don't you want free service for 2 months?" and English was clearly his 5th language because he failed to understand NO. I finally got him to cancel by asking for a supervisor since she couldn't seem to do a simple cancellation. I must have caught him when he was on the edge of losing a bonus. Had he simply said "Hey. Help me out. If you cancel I lose a bonus. How about hanging up and calling back" I would have don that. Wouldn't with Comcast because it takes 20 minutes and multiple phone trees to get to human.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Not just Comcast by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

      I had a similar experience canceling XM several years ago.

    2. Re:Not just Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      CS agents are (partly) scored on sales. Sales typically equals number of new signups + new enhancements - number of leavers. Get too far below the target number and you'll be looking for another shitty minimum wage job.

      Next time you get hung up on when you're close to cancelling, now you know why. Sucks ass. I tend to give the company one shot and if it seems like a hassle, I call back and ask for an address (if they can't provide one, I've asked for one where I can send legal documents---the supervisor will have something handy). Mail them a letter, sit back, and it'll get done with zero bullshit.

    3. Re: Not just Comcast by functor0 · · Score: 2

      I doubt the rep can say that there's the chance that s/he will get fired if the call ever gets reviewed.

    4. Re:Not just Comcast by jsm18 · · Score: 1

      I saw this with Tivo recently too. They asked me if I knew anyone who wanted to take over my account because I apparently had a grandfathered $13/mo account rather than the current $15/mo rate. As if that made the device worth its weight in gold and it was my obligation to find a new home for it.

      In the end, I just told the sales-lady that at the end of the call she will cancel my account. How long the call took was entirely up to her. Seemed to work, though I don't enjoy being rude like that.

    5. Re:Not just Comcast by antdude · · Score: 1

      It seems like all(?) companies are like this. [sighs] :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Not just Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, Sirius deserves their own special ring in hell. I bought a new car and it came with Sirius, and I stupidly signed up for the free trial. No payment was exchanged, so I didn't have to cancel, but then came the onslaught of sales reps. I'm not exaggerating, they were calling me three times a day. I actually told them if I said I wasn't interested this morning and this afternoon, what makes you think I'd be interested this evening.

      They ignored the do not call list, the ignored my requests to be removed from their calling lists, everything. I filed complaints with the FCC, nothing. What finally got them was demanding to speak to a manager, explaining that they were calling me three times daily, and if they thought that a court would issue a restraining order for criminal harassment for such behavior. How do companies think this sort of behavior will get me to sign up for their services?

    7. Re:Not just Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ. XM is the only company on earth I hate more than comcast. I love XMU on Sirius but holy shit do they make it impossible to quit. Calling customer service (at least at the time I went though hell with them) required through a queue which had a wait time of more than an hour every time I called. Finally speaking to the CSR I find out that they can't terminate service you have to speak to a retention specialist. After another queue of 45 min the hard sell begins. I'm firm and I state that I don't want the service anymore. The connection mysteriously goes dead. So I tell my credit card company not to process anymore charges from them and wait. Sure enough after the charge won't process they call. I tell them I don't want their service anymore. They try to pawn me off on a retention specialist again. Long story short, I had to threaten them with getting the attorney general's office involved to get them to stop service. Here's the best part. 6 months later they try to bill me again because apparently they did a deal with Subaru to re-enable service in subaru cars as a special promotion. They seem to feel that if they turn the service back on for you that they can charge you for it if you don't call them and opt out. Opt out?! I told them to bill Subaru as I didn't authorize it and that if they ever turn my service back on I'm getting a lawyer.

  45. Another way to end the call by gurps_npc · · Score: 2
    If you don't feel like saying "I am moving out of your service area." there are two other ways to other ways to handle it.

    1) "Because every time I call you guys, you try to get me to change. You give me a run around and refuse to provide the service requested.

    2) "Because whenever I turn on the TV, it tells me to carve up people that don't do what I tell them to do. So my psychiatrist told me to stop watching television."

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  46. This hits close to home by istartedi · · Score: 1

    I recently moved out of Comcast's service area and am in the process of trying to have improper charges removed. Fortunately I live within a reasonable drive of their SA, where there is a physical office. Thus, I was able to employ the tactic of actually meeting a rep face-to-face. Like I said, I'm still in process though. She said I'd get a check. Both of us were very polite, because of being in person. She even did as I asked and printed a screen capture of her terminal, gave me her name so I would be able to properly document this in case the check never arrives and/or the charges aren't cancelled.

    It's sad that you have to do this. I pity those who can't drive back into the SA and employ this tactic. They will probably have a much harder time.

    BTW, allegedly the first rep that I cancelled with only changed my address, didn't cancel the account. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense to change address outside the SA without cancelling. (sarcasm).

    According to another source (not sure if this is true) reps get a +1 when somebody signs up and a -1 when somebody cancels. If this is true, then it's easy to see how the rep would be tempted to just change the address so that their rating wouldn't be affected. These aren't sales people, they are just order-takers. Sales incentives like that have no place in such situations, since the best sales person in the world cannot provision outside the SA!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  47. That's nothing! by Toasterboy · · Score: 1

    They bounced me around through escalation teams for 45 minutes before letting me cancel. I bought a house in an area that isn't serviced by them and they tried to get me to agree to paying $200,000 to run cable to my new house. Bastards!

    1. Re:That's nothing! by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to understand why you wouldn't want to pay $200,000 for the best cable and internet service in the country, sir.

  48. Why call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write a letter. Fax it, then send it. Goes for dealing with any large organisation, including government but also big corporates.

    Calling is just an excuse for them to abuse you, like sharing their taste in hold music, putting up a labyrinth of phone menus, and yes, mouthing off. Why expose yourself to that? Your time wasted on the phone is much better used wording the letter, and if that's hard on you, even just "I hereby cancel your service" will do. Why bother with the phone? There's an analogue of penny wise, pound foolish going on here.

  49. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    call center employees are being thrown under the bus

    but it's a really nice bus that the CEO's are riding...does anything else really matter?

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  50. Comcast Internet good, customer service not by Clomer · · Score: 1

    My experience with Comcast as an ISP is that the service itself is actually pretty good, if a tad expensive. I have a high-speed, low latency connection with native IPv6. However, I cringe whenever I have to contact their customer service for any reason. Their policies seem designed to make any customer interaction as painful as possible, and I have never had a positive experience when I have had to call them. This recording does not surprise me at all, as the representatives that cancel service probably have metrics that state they must save a certain percentage of those that call to cancel (my guess is that particular rep had been threatened by his boss that if he didn't do better in that regard that he'd lose his job).

    If they want to fix their bad CS, they need to make fundamental changes to the way they approach customer service. A good starting point is to give their reps more authority to deal with issues themselves and not be beholden to policy. If the company doesn't trust their employees to make good judgement calls on what's good for the customer and the business, then they shouldn't have hired them in the first place. When someone calls to cancel, it is OK to politely ask why once, but if the person refuses to answer it should be left at that. Remove any metrics that are in place about how many saves a rep must perform.

    --
    Intelligent responses welcome, flames will be met with marshmallows.
    1. Re:Comcast Internet good, customer service not by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      My experience with Comcast as an ISP is that the service itself is actually pretty good, if a tad expensive. I have a high-speed, low latency connection with native IPv6. ....

      I would agree with this. The internet service is quite good, if pricy. And having IPv6 dual stack is very nice.

  51. Re:they don't give a fuck by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The premise of the parody was funny. The delivery of it was too over the top to be funny after the 2nd F-Bomb was dropped.

    And the word of the day is: Amature

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  52. Just hang up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why argue? Just hang up and, if something remains undone, call back later.

  53. Not 8 minutes by jcochran · · Score: 4, Informative

    This same article was recently posted on Techdirt. The call wasn't 8 minutes. The RECORDING was 8 minutes. There was 10 minutes of call prior to the recording even starting.

  54. That's why it's called the RETENTION department... by mdelcorso · · Score: 1

    This happens to everybody every day... The poor SOBs in the retention department (notice the name), are rated based on how many people they can RETAIN. They can be fired if they have a bad day and a whole bunch of folks actually manage to cancel.

  55. Re:they don't give a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and the word of this day is: Amateur.

  56. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by internerdj · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it gives Comcast the wiggle room to say exactly what they said.

  57. Max Headroom Reference: by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Police officer: Oh my god, this guy's TV has an off-switch!
    Other officer: He'll fry for that!

    For those of you who never got to enjoy this fabulous series from the mid-1980's Max Headroom took place is a dystopian society where TV ruled the land, and being able to shut it off was illegal. Even political offices were voted on via ratings. Being "blank" (unable to be tracked via computer, no credit history, no marketing history) made you a terrorist. 20 minutes into the future my friend.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Max Headroom Reference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Blank is beautiful!

      /favorite and most prophetic episode of the entire series.

  58. Rep meet the underside of the bus. by AdamHarrison · · Score: 2

    I suspect the Comcast Rep was following his script just as he was instructed. But the Rep is an easy scapegoat for Comcast.

  59. Welcome to the modern CRM experience by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    After listening to this call I'm just laughing because I've been experiencing this for years. It's all about maintaining those subscribers and it shows that the Comcast rep was probably a used car salesman in a prior life. Maybe he's going back there after this episode but who knows. What's funny is that people are actually surprised about this because every major company in the US, especially those who sell subscription based services, have these kinds of last ditch sales people to keep you hooked up. It's all about customer relationship management 101, keep them in the relationship.

    This guy from Comcast represents once again while consolidation in the telecom and cable industries is a bad thing. Plus with Comcast controlling NBC and all its subsidiaries we now get such great entertainment as "Sharknado 2", this isn't better its worse.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  60. My Cancel experience with Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a piece of cake. I took my DVR and all of my various HD and SD convertor boxes to my closest Comcast office. The lady took them all and scanned them. She said our records indicate this is everything you had from us and that you have your own cable modem, are you keeping internet service? I said yes. She handed me a receipt for the turned in equipment and I walked out. My next months bill arrived, it was prorated and I was only charged charged for internet.

    Not a single word was spoken about trying to retain me as a cable subscriber. It was a very easy experience.

    1. Re:My Cancel experience with Comcast by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      Yes - this exactly. I did the same. The lady that helped me was quick, courteous, and clearly not a trained sales person. Saving me as a customer wasn't in her job description. Getting things done quickly and efficiently in order to help the next customer in line was. If you have a Comcast service center in your area this is the only way to go (not to mention it makes equipment returns much easier).

  61. Where is my apology from Comcast?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We went through something similar and eventually got to canceling the service.... then there is the matter of returning the equipment – keep a copy of the documentation because after a few months we had multiple calls from a third party that was assigned to do "equipment recovery" and they were even a worst pain than the Comcast harassment department.

    We should get reimbursed for the time and trouble they put us through and actually filed a complaint with the Minnesota Attorney General's office of Consumer Protection. While I don't expect our case to make much of a difference, after a few thousand complaints they might change their procedure to rob us in a more gentile manner.

  62. Among other things wrong with this ..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    The suggestion by the service rep. that the 105 mbit speeds were "guaranteed" is insanity!

    Even in cases where a customer pays about 2x the normal price for Comcast's business class service, the speeds are absolutely NOT guaranteed! My workplace uses Comcast in a couple of our offices (pulled it out of others, where better options were available), and we suffer fairly regular service interruptions/outages which are very disruptive because our internal phone system runs over VoIP. Comcast never credits us a dime for the time the service is down, and even when it's simply under-performing, they'll remind us that "cable broadband is a best-effort delivery mechanism; not a guaranteed level of service".

    If you're on a residential connection? Good luck with even reaching a live person to voice a service complaint! Unlike the business customers, residential users typically get tossed into a call queue that requires a 45 minute to 60 minute hold time to speak with someone.

    I'm using Comcast broadband at home, myself (again, because no other options exist where I live except for Verizon's 6 mbit DSL - which IMO, hardly even qualifies as an option). I've found that the service is reasonably good at delivering what they promise (although I'd say it averages about one outage per month), but everything from customer service to sales is lousy. They've changed around programming packages so often, it can be difficult to even figure out which high speed options are offered in your area. (I initially wanted something at least comparable to the 85 mbit FiOS service I used to have at my old address, but the Comcast literature all claimed my options were getting 50 mbits with a "Blast" package, or paying somewhere close to $200 per month for some kind of 150 mbit "Extreme" package. Gritting my teeth, I decided to just pay the high cost and try the 150 mbit service, only to be told I wasn't even able to buy it if I was doing a "self install" (using my own cable modem), which I was trying to do. Comcast wanted to charge me $250 or so for a guy to come out here and do the installation, which there was NO WAY I'd pay for since the place was pre-wired from the previous homeowner and I had the best-in-class Motorola modem ready to use.

    So THEN I found out if I just went with that 50 mbit Blast package, I'd actually get 100 mbits with it because Comcast "recently doubled the speeds, for free, in most of the Northeastern U.S.". Great, I guess?! But what lousy marketing to hide that from people and trick some people into paying far more to get the overpriced 150 mbit service they might not have even really wanted.

    1. Re:Among other things wrong with this ..... by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      Even in cases where a customer pays about 2x the normal price for Comcast's business class service, the speeds are absolutely NOT guaranteed!

      I was a comcast customer and I hate them. The guarantee is a guarantee of the max speed, not minimum. I went round and round with an idiot CS rep for about 5 minutes on that one before I basically told him to STFU and move on to the next BS question on the menu.

  63. Not just Comcast by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    This is nothing new or unique to Comcast. Anytime you try to cancel service with anybody these days you get the hard sales pitch. No one wants to take "no" for an answer anymore. Customer service departments are really sales departments. Notice that you can never unsubscribe to anything online, you have to call a person.

    Cancelled DirecTV and it sounded like the other guy was ready to cry because I was leaving. Asking what he could do to keep me around (well given that I was down to two shows I watched, he could have dropped the price to $10/month).

    Cancelled the local newspaper and they gave me the hard sell too. Finally insisting they gave in and kept the deliveries until the current payment period ran out. Except that it didn't quite work, they didn't quite realize I had unsubscribed. When the payment period ended they left voice mail saying that my credit card was not validated and could I call them back to give them a good number, then a got the mail bill saying "First Notice" that I hadn't paid. Unlike their customer support website, the bill actuall had an email address so I sent an angry letter (I sort of regret it) and promptly had things cleared up.

    And again, this is not new, it's been around for a long time. I cancelled ebay once, after a single purchase, and was told that cancelling my account would also mean me losing my buyer rating... A lot of online sites hide their unsubscribe information. Push a couple buttons on the remote and I can add HBO to my service for a month, but I have to phone up in person to get it cancelled again.

  64. Have you ever tried to cancel VOIP service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck with that. I know cable TV and phone companies have terrible CS but the three or so VOIP companies I've dealt with a FAR WORSE. Blatantly lie, ignore calls, never respond to emails and will keep charching you even after you go through every hoop to officially quit. I even had one charge my card again and then dispute my dispute of the charge. Same thing happened to me with Sirius satellite recently.

    I did not know that even with an expired or a new number CC, companies can still put through a charge if they can establish with the CC company that you already had an account with them and a prior relationship. I asked AMEX about this over my Sirius dispute and they pimped it as a perk for my benefit. Their theory was I had a made payments monthly or quarterly with Sirius in the past so they allowed them to continue charging using my expired card (Sirius did not have my new number) so my service would not be interrupted because I forgot may have forgot to give them my new number. I've been receiving the Washington Post newspaper every Sunday for almost 6 years from a CC number they have that I have not had in over 5 years.

  65. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ESPN will have 14 hours/day of the British Open this Thu & Fri. When soccer was on, full coverage of it. How do you figure it is all college sports?

  66. More than 8 minutes by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

    ...but not before the customer service representative pressed him for eight solid minutes (audio) to explain his reasoning for leaving "the number one provider of TV and internet service in the country"...

    Slight correction: the customer service representative pressed him for a further eight solid minutes.

    He'd already been on the call for ten minutes before they started the recording!

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  67. The sad thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that I would love to be a Comcast customer, but they don't offer service in my building in Seattle. I'm stuck with 640 kbps (no DOS jokes, please) from CenturyLink. They're the only choice we have, and with the fifty+ year-old phone wiring, that is the fastest DSL we can get. A friend down the street has 10 Mbps Comcast. I'd kill for that. The worst thing is that he pays less than I do for my barely over half a megabit per second pitiful connection. The only good thing is that it is rock-solid unlike his Comcast connection that goes down for several hours a day. I'd be willing to live with that for a connection over ten times faster. CenturyLink has only been down a couple of times I've lived here the past seven years.

    1. Re:The sad thing... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      How the heck can you browse slashdot on a 640kbps connection? Ah, I kid the Slashdot.

      I feel for you, limited online gaming, and slow youtube cat videos. I'm with Mediacom, their "Prime" 15/1 service, which is never actually 15/1...for some reason it's always faster, more like 17/2.5 most of the time. The price is at the "sweet spot" too. They do offer a 50/5, but it's not at the sweet spot yet.

      Mediacom has effectively no competition for internet, not because they don't have any competitors...it's because their offering is just simply so much better than any other locally available service. You can "maybe" get 6mbps DSL...if you're lucky enough to live where the wiring is really new.

      It's bad enough that one of the dish based TV providers now partners with Mediacom in a combined satellite/internet package. Did I mention t hat Mediacom is a cable company?

  68. "I want to speak to your manager" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    When I reach resistance to a reasonable request, I begin chanting my mantra. You cannot help me, I need to speak to your manager. Sometimes there is an "obviously" inserted after the first word of the mantra. If I am not handed off after three repetitions or less, then I hang up and play again.

    No one should ever waste eight minutes of their life talking to a sadistic phone monkey.

    I've done phone support, it's not an excuse to be an ass. In fact, you have a responsibility to the customer, even if they are becoming a not-customer. They've paid for your time already.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. Just another comcast script by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I became - not entirely by my own choice - a comcast customer last summer (I previously lived in a place with a different cable company who had vastly superior service in every aspect). Every time I have called for support I have had to deal with operators who were running on obvious scripts. I expect the 8 minute hard sell to try to prevent the customer from leaving was only another script.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  70. AOL by Revek · · Score: 1

    They used to make it impossible to disconnect from their service.

  71. True to their own website by houghi · · Score: 1

    From their website at http://customer.comcast.com/he...

    If you are looking to completely cancel your XFINITY service, we ask that you call us at 1-800-XFINITY (1-800-934-6489). We want to make sure weâ(TM)ve done everything we can to give you the best experience, price and package. We would also love to hear any feedback you have so that we can improve our service.

    The call agent was just true to what Comcast told him to do. To be SURE everything has been done possible.
    Fun thing is that when you go up one level to http://customer.comcast.com/he... you won't find the information on how to cancel. In fact I needed google to find the page.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  72. Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I recently had the promo period for my service expire and the price go up $40. I had to yell at the rep for five minutes just to get him to admit that they had lower price tier packages. His excuse was "Well normally people don't want to lose any speed." Yeah? What part of "I don't care about speed I just need a lower price" didn't get through your thick skull?

  73. Know whats really sad by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Know whats really sad is that kinda stupid blind company support will get him nothing...... Here,s a guy who really love the company he works for, but Comcast would lay his ass off in a heartbeat to bring costs down. This Guy must be a new hire because only a new hire talks and acts in such blind support of his/her company. Sad, corporations take advantage of such blind support.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:Know whats really sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are truly awful at listening, if you think that poor sap was expressing any genuine enthusiasm for Comcast or its service.

  74. Oy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Posting AC to avoid the embarassment that I was once an AOL customer.

    The irony of some person from AOL having difficulty disconnecting from Comcast is just awesome.

    Back in the deep dark past of the 90's, I had an AOL account for a few months. My bills were a lot higher than they should have been.

    All I got from AOL was a curt "That must have been what you used".

    Then I found out that instead of the X amount of time I got every month, they were charging me for every minute I was online in addition to my monthly fee.

    Then the fun began. Trying to find the number to call was trial number 1. It was hidden within deep dark recesses of their documentation. Calls to AOL on their regular numbers only got me told that it was "in the documentation", and they couldn't tell me. Then it was "oh - your a day past the billing date - you'll have to pay for an entire month if you disconnect now. There were a few other jerks I had to deal with before I could actually disconnect. Took about a month.

    Then the stalking began. Telephone calls and emails and snail mails "We want you back" for well over a year. If they had only spent 10 percent of the effort actually fixing my problem, I might have remained with them.

    All I can say is how's it feel AOL Asshole?

    1. Re:Oy by Kryptonian+Jor-El · · Score: 1

      Ryan Block is a writer you retard. He works for AOL because the company he was writing for got bought out by AOL. Its not like he's some executive for the company

      --
      All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
  75. Because Breaking Up is Hard to do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast needs a marriage counselor

  76. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Sure, but when I say that my reason for cancellation is I'M MOVING OUT, stop hounding me.

    Also, when I call to inquire at my new residence, telling me that your downstream speed is 25 megabytes/sec is a good way to make me ask "Ma'am, do you mean megabytes, or megabits?"

    An answer of "Oh, we mean megabytes! Our competition measures their speeds in megabits but we have megabytes, which are eight times as much!" won't inspire confidence.

  77. Not just Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried cancelling Megapath (formerly Speakeasy) service some years back. You could only do it via a web form they had hidden. They wouldn't accept it over the phone. And the web form did absolutely nothing. I finally got out of it when my credit card expired and I had to use the fact that I wasn't going to authorize any payments with the lady on the phone to make the cancellation work (which it mysteriously did only when I was on the phone complaining to someone...).

    I also learned to keep better records of cancellation in the future. Next time I fill out a form, I will keep timestamped screenshots and verify them against an external service, because I only realized later that they were expecting me to deny the charges and they were going to lie about me not cancelling if I fought the charges with my CC company.

    In the mean time, I will never, ever do business with Megapath again. Though they'll probably just buy some other once-decent company like Speakeasy and destroy their once good name and abuse their customers. The sad thing was that Speakeasy was once an awesome, helpful internet service. When Best Buy bought them out, they eventually had the name changed and went to hell.

  78. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by AudioEfex · · Score: 1

    That is *exactly* what would have been happened. Companies call them "missed opportunities". This is an internal culture/training/systemic issue, not a rouge agent. Unfortunately, it's likely only that agent that will suffer.

    While I agree the whole thing was ludicrous, but one thing that stuck with me when I first heard about this was the recording - it's not legal everywhere to record a call without letting the party know (it varies wildly by state), and even if the other side notifies you they are recording (like most customer service) I think in some places it would have to be notified on both sides. Not a big deal, just something that made me think. I also find it a little odd that they had a recorder hooked up - I have one I use for occasional phone interviews with subjects, but I don't have it hooked up all the time.

    Again, probably nothing to that - and in any case, it's an issue Comcast should be held to address internally regarding retention, no excuses for that, but if can't shake the nagging "this is very convenient, isn't it?" questions, either.

  79. My experience cancelling AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look into Ting.

  80. Poetic justice for an AOL employee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading about this elsewhere. Some of the AOL 'retention reps' were making 90k+ a year to keep customers and often earned even more.

  81. Easy solution ... provide a better excuse by failedlogic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't tell them you're transferring to a competitor. That gives them all the excuses to 'save' your account.

    My father was canceling his cable Internet service and reconnecting with another provider. I knew about all these tricks they use to retain customers. He had tried calling before and was put on hold, transferred, then spoke to someone for a few minutes and was again put on hold. He ended up hanging up the phone in frustration.

    My solution to him was provide a different reason to cancel.

    Told my father a better excuse. The next call lasted less than 1 minute. No transfers, no retention reps. A CSR cancelled the service. The reason: carpal tunnel syndrome. As soon as he said he can't use the keyboard/mouse anymore they immediately cancelled no other reason needed.

    Hope this helps others! :)

    1. Re:Easy solution ... provide a better excuse by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to resort to lying, or begging or pleading to get my service canceled.

      I will make one call, give them maybe 30 minutes max, and if they don't cancel my service, no problem... I'm just not paying my next bill. Problem solved.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Easy solution ... provide a better excuse by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Firstly, remember they WILL resort to lying, begging or pleading to get you to keep the service.

      Secondly, unless you keep a record of you telling them you are cancelling, either in a recording or registered mail, they will send your unpaid bills to debt collectors, and your credit rating will take a nosedive.

      So either lie to them, or record the phone call, make it last 5 minutes. "Hi I'm calling to cancel my account, here are my customer details... I am keeping a recording of this call for my records. Have a nice day"

  82. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by penix1 · · Score: 1

    If you read what he posted as well as listen, you would see that he hooked it up 10 minutes into the call already. So the first 10 minutes are not recorded.

    As for recording in general, you are correct that it varies wildly from state to state. Some have no requirement to inform, some have a requirement that at least one party be informed and others have it that all parties must be informed. That is why that recording saying, "This call may be monitored for quality assurance" is always given out on customer facing lines.

    It should be noted that there are exceptions to the notification requirement most notably 911 and other emergency services phones don't have to notify callers that they are being recorded.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  83. Do not 'phone - write by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Send a letter to their registered head office stating that you do not want their service from xxx date. Then cancel the payment with your bank. Job done.

    Your new provider can do whatever work is needed to take the line over. Send them a copy of the letter that you send to your old provider.

  84. 2G is going away; recycle it if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've got a car charger for it, you might keep it around as an emergency backup phone for calling 911, but 2G is going away. My Garmin GPS was using it for traffic data and Google searches, and their contract for 2G/2.5G data service ends next March so their newer GPS's can't sign up for the feature (as I found to my great annoyance when replacing one with a cracked screen.)

    Disclaimer: This is my opinion as a grumpy Garmin owner; as an AT&T employee I'd have to tell you to look at the corporate website if you want more details about exactly when 2G gets shut down. And coverage really has improved since the early 2000s :-)

  85. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by owski · · Score: 1

    In his defense on the recorder, it does sound like he's simply recording a speaker phone with something, such as another cell phone. At the beginning of the recording you can hear a bit of him fumbling around to get it going.

  86. Re:they don't give a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The premise of the parody was funny. The delivery of it was too over the top to be funny after the 2nd F-Bomb was dropped.

    Yeah when you find out the rest of the Internet doesn't support, accomodate, and coddle your prudish, ever-so-tender Victorian "sensibilities" and hang-ups, that's a real bitch, huh?

    My God, in other news, women nowadays are showing their ANKLES! What lewd, lecherous, naughty HARLOTS they are! A scarlet letter for them all, says I!

  87. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Fuck the employees. Call center employees I've talked to are always on the side of the company, and will defend it to the death. They're not just working for a paycheck, they really believe the shit they spew. We like to believe that most employees really are just working to make ends meet and feed their families, but it's really not true; most people become emotionally invested in the power structure they're part of. It's the same phenomenon that drives patriotism, defending "your side's" political candidate, etc.

  88. Just tell them that you died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hi, I need to cancel John Doe's Comcast account."
    "Blah blah blah why?"
    "He died. This is his attorney. The house is being sold."
    "ok"

    1. Re:Just tell them that you died by stiggle · · Score: 1

      "I'll need a copy of his death certificate and proof of your power of attorney over the estate as I'm not permitted to deal with anyone other than the account holder, or authorised by the account holder"

  89. The most important thing to know when dealing with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switching from Cablevision to FIOS I too had the extreme run around. Despite contracts clearly stating my existing number was to be ported they claimed it was somehow lost (Verizon blamed Cablevision and vice-versa). Hours on the phone with customer service resulted in ever ruder agents, who would not give their name or escalate to their superiors.

    It all changed once a filed a complaint on the FCC website (very simple, just fill some data and send some scanned contract paperwork). Within two days BOTH companies were falling over themselves with their "Chairman's Executive Resolution" teams fixing the previously "unfixable" problem, and even following up to make sure I was completely satisfied.

    I highly recommend the FCC complaint site!

  90. Ah the Comcast apoligy by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 1

    I bet when they apologized to him they offered him 1/2 price service for 3 months.

  91. Re:they don't give a fuck by dohnut · · Score: 2

    We need to get this dude (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj2oXMdZ4sk) and this rep from Comcast on the same line.

    --
    Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
  92. bandwidth delay product by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Aside from the general rule that newer, faster network equipment tends to be faster, there's also the bandwidth delay product. The bandwidth delay product means that as bandwidth increases, it high latency tends to cost the ISP money.

    Assume you have a 1mbps link and a 100mbps link.
    Let's say they both have latency of 100ms. If you're pushing 1mbps and there is 100ms worth "in the pipe", that's 0.1mb stored in the router queues. At ten times the throughput, 100ms of data is ten times as much data stored in very expensive Cisco routers at any given time.

  93. Comcast is horrific by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    No, really, I mean they actually horrify me. It's special.

  94. Re:they don't give a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of course, The famous 1976 sketch We don't care; we don't have to. We're the phone company.

  95. Re:they don't give a fuck by antdude · · Score: 1

    And note http://i.imgur.com/77HxH2g.png (one second long from the video) that it is on Time Warner Cable (TWC).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  96. Comcast billed me for imaginary hardware, twice by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    Completely unsurprising. Comcast billed me for imaginary hardware, twice.

    I set up cable Internet service with Comcast at a vacation home with no TVs in it about two years ago, just to be able to surf the web, etc., while there. Sometime around December, 2013, Comcast apparently decided that we needed TV service and shipped a set top box to the address, where it apparently sat, covered with a light dusting of snow for months (it's a vacation home). And, of course, they billed us for TV service and a rental fee for the box for months. I got that straightened out, and a credit issued.

    A couple of weeks ago, I looked at my bill from them, and, lo and behold, they have been charging me an $8.00/month modem rental fee. I bought my cable modem from Fry's for less than the $96/year that would have ended up costing me.

    As far as I can tell, when they removed my non-existent TV service and took back their set top box for the imaginary TVs, they stuck on a modem lease fee.

    I have finally gotten that straightened out, and, no doubt, will have some new billing failure from them in a few months for hardware or services I did not request, own or otherwise purchase from them.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
  97. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by Clever7Devil · · Score: 1

    Many areas with NO second choice for broadband

    +

    Many people with no second choice for employer

    =

    Unhappy customers on the phone with unhappy employees who REALLY need this gig, and could be replaced before close of business

    --
    "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -Gary Larson
  98. KILL The Rep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Comcast Rep is findable, targetable and killable.

    Just Do It; Kill The Rep.

    I demand Comcast CEO, CFO and BOG to suck my dick and pay me $130 billion dollars USA not to kill the Rep.

    NOW.

  99. Re:they don't give a fuck by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Nice find !

  100. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    I doubt that. Suppose after 7 minutes, the customer agrees to keep the service? Then you already have a pending deactivation in the queue, and the service would be cut, possibly BEFORE the customer hangs up. If the customer finds out that his service has indeed been cut even after agreeing to keep it, that would just give him more reason to cancel the service.

  101. Older by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "We're the Phone Company. We don't care; we don't have to." -- Lilly Tomlinson, pre-AT&T monopoly break-up

  102. we are comcast by executioner · · Score: 1

    You will be assimilated into the collective.. resistance is futile.

    --
    "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  103. Re:they don't give a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you assume that he didn't intend to write Armature?

  104. Make Them Pay by gordguide · · Score: 1

    I had a little hassle with my Cable Company over cancelling my service, so I just hung up and redialed. The second call was to "remove the cable drop" because the "house was being demolished". They actually gave me a little grief over this, so I said "either you remove it or I will, and I won't be careful". This costs them (around here) about $200 because they contract this to a third party company. Don't worry if you want cable again in the future, they will happily re-install the drop. Costs them ANOTHER $200). You can do this any number of times you want. They will always remove and reinstall at their expense.

  105. Re:We're sorry he so faithfully followed instructi by BVis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a former call center worker (multiple centers), I can tell you unequivocally that that is bullshit. Your average CSR does not give a single fuck about the company they're working for (or the company that their company has a contract with). They're paid to absorb anger and read scripts. There is no intellectual input other than saying what they're told accurately. The first time your manager at the call center chews you out for doing a fantastic job and resolving the problem to everyone's satisfaction, but going over your handle time by 3 seconds, you run out of fucks to give.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  106. Hello, Ma! by kallisti5 · · Score: 1

    Not surprised. This is what happens when you let monopolies grow unregulated. Comcast is the new Ma-Bell. We need to demand congress break up the cable giant.

  107. the kettle calling the pot black by gary_johnson_53 · · Score: 1

    When I tried to cancel AOL (over 15 years ago) they were just as bad,if not worst.

  108. Need a new service by sjames · · Score: 2

    What we really need is a corporate breakup service as part of a credit/debit card. They can send a nice letter like

    Dear Comcast, We are sorry to inform you that John Smith wants to end his relationship with you. He feels that you're growing in different directions and the chemistry isn't the same. In short, he's just not that into you.. He wants to see other cable providers.

    Then to avoid any boiling rabbits and such, they should refuse all further charges from them to their ex-customer's card. As a premium service, they should also file a restraining order keeping the ex's marketing department at least 500 feet away at all times.

  109. Just say the account owner DIED. by realsilly · · Score: 1

    Even simpler solution:

    Act all distraught, make it sound like you're sobbing just thinking about it, and explain that you're cancelling the service for the account user who has recently Died.

    Any telemarketer calls I've ever gotten I start sobbing and claiming I don't have time for them because I just lost my family to some tragic accident of type . I get an apology and my number is removed from the lists immediately.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  110. How Brazil handled it by dafradu · · Score: 1

    In Brazil we had a new set of rules in this regard issued by ANATEL (like the FCC). They made it so your can cancel your service through the internet or choosing a menu item on the call center, no need to talk to a human.
    They also have to call you back if you get cut off, you can request and get the recordings using the internet, special packages must apply to new and old costumers etc.

  111. The actual apology rather than some blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-statement-regarding-customer-service-call

  112. Easy to get it over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tell them that you are moving to Japan and getting Ftth service. Their competition is offering 1Gbps fiber at just under $59.00 US (6000 yen) per month. Can they beat that?

  113. This is sad. by messymerry · · Score: 1

    I reviewed as many comments as I could stand and it seems that a common solution is to "lie through your teeth". Is this really what the conduct of what should be routine business come to? It's no wonder there is no trust in the world anymore. This will be our undoing. It may actually turn out that AI instead of offing us may be our salvation. Welcome home Gort...

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
  114. so no one remembers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how hard it was to cancel an aol account?

  115. Tell rep. falsely, that you're recording call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it legal to not record the call, but to falsely tell the representative that you are recording it?

    Tell him/her that you are recording the call, you will post the recording on your web site, and you will tell news media about the recording. Hopefully then the rep will be more helpful.

    Tell the rep. that you will put their name on the web site, as well as the recording. (You got their name from the beginning of the call, when they said, "Hi, my name is XYZ, how may I help you?")

  116. Same thing happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I tried to cancel my cable service with them. I said, "There's nothing on TV I want to watch" and the person on the phone kept trying to convince me I hadn't watched enough TV to know that. I've decided if I ever need to do something like this, I'm going to say that I have changed religions and God does not want me to have these services.

  117. I have a hit on my credit report because of this - by choke · · Score: 1

    I was moving out of my house and needed to cancel cable service. I called them, and was put on hold and transferred around and spent no less than 45 minutes trying to get ahold of the right person to cancel my account and was disconnected twice.

    In complete frustration, I transferred my cable bill to a separate credit card and cancelled that card. It was all I could do to get rid of comcast without another hour on the phone that I didn't have while packing the house and getting everything ready to go.

    The experience was incredibly frustrating.

    --
    "No good deed goes unpunished"
  118. Law: cancel the same way you signed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be a new FTC ruling to force providers to allow you to cancel with the same method you signed up. If they can take a new subscription by web, by golly they must take a cancelation in the same way.