You do realize that when you go off the handle like this, it just proves his point, right?
He said nothing negative about hosts file usage, or your software, he merely pointed out that you have a tendency to be rather abusive, which you have to admit is rather true of your posting history. If you have issues with what he said, perhaps you should look deep down and reconsider the path of your life.
Did you actually take the "test" to see what you would block vs what they blocked? They blocked things that were critical of anything, including a comment talking about how the Guardian has really gone downhill in their sports reporting as they seem to like some player so much who is just ok. Their idea of things that need to be blocked are so far skewed, that they could easily be talking about how everywhere should be a safe space.
“stupid ugly woman writes stupid ugly steaming pile of dog-shite”
as it brought nothing to the conversation, but even that would be acceptable in some places. I saw no cases of actual abuse in their examples. If you can't take people criticising you, don't publish on the internet.
Did the space nutter AC just out him(her)self? No, we are not space nutters for trying to push the envelopes of science, and no, not all science fiction is impossible.
Also, that Washington post article you posted along with your claim that Nixon wasnt a moderate has nothing to do with Nixon. It's an article about Obama. Just because it has Nixon's name in it a single time doesnt mean it's about him.
Perhaps before talking about what an article does and does not talk about, you should try reading it? Half way down the page we have a pretty liberal vs conservative graphic which shows that indeed, Nixon was conservative!
Perhaps there is a reason for that. Immigration should not be taken lightly, it is a tremendous decision, and it is something that harms the country you are leaving. It should not be easy to just leave your country of birth and move to another just because you don't like your home country anymore.
A study for the National Foundation for American Policy estimated that to hire someone on an H-1B visa, a U.S. employer has to pay about $2,500 in legal fees; a $1,500 training fee; a $1,000 “premium processing” fee; a $500 antifraud fee; a $190 immigration service fee; around $125 in additional incidental costs; and a $100 visa fee. That totals almost $6,000. Complicated immigration cases can cost eligible applicants $10,000 or more in legal fees alone. Meanwhile, even unauthorized immigrants from Central America pay between $7,000 and $10,000 in smuggling fees to get across the border, according to Alex Nowrasteh at the Competitive Enterprise Institute—often more than once, because they get caught, thrown out, and try to return.
So, a difficult immigration can cost around $10k, however, people are paying that amount to come in illegally in smuggling fees. So it must not be an issue how much it costs. The $6000 they list for hiring a H1B sounds pretty fair too, it costs around that to hire a citizen instead.
Adoption costs around this much, and it is just as much of a decision.
You missed the recent lies told about the abortion comments.
NBC's Chris Matthews asked Trump, if abortion was illegal, should women who get abortions be arrested? Then every report on this seems to conveniently omit the original question when trying to cast him as hating women.
All three of those articles fail to mention the bolded part above, all Trump was saying is "if it is illegal, of course your should get punished for it", they are all making it out to be that he thinks all women who get abortions should be punished, when he didn't even say that.
FYI, punching someone who spits on you is in many places considered a measured response. If someone spits on you, that is an assault, in cases of assault, you are within your rights to defend yourself. The 70 year old man will win out in that case, it is just a matter of time for the case to be heard.
Being caught on film spitting on a 70 year old man is not too wise.
When Trump and his four brothers inherited their father’s real-estate business in 1974, the company was valued at an estimated $200 million. Trump’s share would have been worth $40 million. According to Vox.com, if Trump had invested that $40 million in an S&P 500 index fund in 1974, and reinvested all the dividends, not cash out and paid no fees, by August of 2015 he would have been worth $3.4 billion.
As far as the bankruptcies, taking risks is exactly that, risk. Companies fail all the time, blaming someone who probably had very little actual contact with a company for its failure is silly. He has many more than 4 companies that succeeded, so his success rate is also way higher than yours.
It appears that industry is attacking it from the other side. You can have your distractions, we'll do the driving for you.
Personally, I think it will be great, how do you pull someone over for DWI if the car is doing the driving?
Even being able to drive 8 hours to visit family would be so much better if you could just sit and watch movies with the kids while the car drives itself.
Perhaps if he had paid his parking tickets he wouldn't have that issue. There was nothing there about the lack of wisdom of an iPhone cookie, just the lack of wisdom in baiting the police while having a warrant out for your arrest.
To leave the place in a better position than you found it.
In which case no war in history was ever won. Glad to hear how you feel, it definitely puts your opinion in perspective...as not meaning a damn thing.
What would be the conditions of winning in your world?
If Iraq wasn't a whole lot worse than it was when Saddam was running the place. Afghanistan is still going and the insurgency is just as strong as on day one 15 years ago. If that's your version of victory you're a fucking idiot.
I'm sure I'm the fucking idiot here, considering that by all measures the Taliban isn't in power, and are being forced to the negotiation table to lay down their arms, much like the FARC in Colombia.
It seems odd that that chart indicates resources as high, as in the cloud layer there are nearly no resources and getting to the ones on the surface would be difficult (to say the least...).
I want to know what ride service is being offered for men where they won't be accused of rape without reason, and where they aren't at risk of being raped by man or woman. Also, I particularly have issue with the implication that only men can rape, and apparently this service believes that all men are rapists, so can't be trusted to drive women around. What is to stop a woman from raping another woman anyways?
Slashdot Mirror
You do realize that when you go off the handle like this, it just proves his point, right?
He said nothing negative about hosts file usage, or your software, he merely pointed out that you have a tendency to be rather abusive, which you have to admit is rather true of your posting history. If you have issues with what he said, perhaps you should look deep down and reconsider the path of your life.
Did you actually take the "test" to see what you would block vs what they blocked? They blocked things that were critical of anything, including a comment talking about how the Guardian has really gone downhill in their sports reporting as they seem to like some player so much who is just ok. Their idea of things that need to be blocked are so far skewed, that they could easily be talking about how everywhere should be a safe space.
Agreed. I would have only blocked the last one:
“stupid ugly woman writes stupid ugly steaming pile of dog-shite”
as it brought nothing to the conversation, but even that would be acceptable in some places. I saw no cases of actual abuse in their examples. If you can't take people criticising you, don't publish on the internet.
Also probably thinks the power will work like Qi.
Did the space nutter AC just out him(her)self? No, we are not space nutters for trying to push the envelopes of science, and no, not all science fiction is impossible.
http://www.dictionary.com/brow...
There is, but not the way we normally use the phrase never mind.
Until someone is convinced of violating the law it is just another data breach.
You can't convince me to break the law!
I think you mean convicted?
Also, that Washington post article you posted along with your claim that Nixon wasnt a moderate has nothing to do with Nixon. It's an article about Obama. Just because it has Nixon's name in it a single time doesnt mean it's about him.
Perhaps before talking about what an article does and does not talk about, you should try reading it? Half way down the page we have a pretty liberal vs conservative graphic which shows that indeed, Nixon was conservative!
https://img.washingtonpost.com...
Perhaps there is a reason for that. Immigration should not be taken lightly, it is a tremendous decision, and it is something that harms the country you are leaving. It should not be easy to just leave your country of birth and move to another just because you don't like your home country anymore.
A study for the National Foundation for American Policy estimated that to hire someone on an H-1B visa, a U.S. employer has to pay about $2,500 in legal fees; a $1,500 training fee; a $1,000 “premium processing” fee; a $500 antifraud fee; a $190 immigration service fee; around $125 in additional incidental costs; and a $100 visa fee. That totals almost $6,000. Complicated immigration cases can cost eligible applicants $10,000 or more in legal fees alone. Meanwhile, even unauthorized immigrants from Central America pay between $7,000 and $10,000 in smuggling fees to get across the border, according to Alex Nowrasteh at the Competitive Enterprise Institute—often more than once, because they get caught, thrown out, and try to return.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...
So, a difficult immigration can cost around $10k, however, people are paying that amount to come in illegally in smuggling fees. So it must not be an issue how much it costs. The $6000 they list for hiring a H1B sounds pretty fair too, it costs around that to hire a citizen instead.
Adoption costs around this much, and it is just as much of a decision.
This site says that some Visas cost as little as $465, so it is just too much money!
http://www.theguardian.com/mon...
You missed the recent lies told about the abortion comments.
NBC's Chris Matthews asked Trump, if abortion was illegal, should women who get abortions be arrested? Then every report on this seems to conveniently omit the original question when trying to cast him as hating women.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/tr...
All three of those articles fail to mention the bolded part above, all Trump was saying is "if it is illegal, of course your should get punished for it", they are all making it out to be that he thinks all women who get abortions should be punished, when he didn't even say that.
It is modded down as he is espousing positions that Trump did not take.
FYI, punching someone who spits on you is in many places considered a measured response. If someone spits on you, that is an assault, in cases of assault, you are within your rights to defend yourself. The 70 year old man will win out in that case, it is just a matter of time for the case to be heard.
Being caught on film spitting on a 70 year old man is not too wise.
Considering that many experts estimate his net worth in the Billions, it would appear you are the one who is wrong.
http://247wallst.com/media/201...
Forbes: $4.5 billion
Bloomberg: $2.9 billion
Even the starting amount you give is wrong:
When Trump and his four brothers inherited their father’s real-estate business in 1974, the company was valued at an estimated $200 million. Trump’s share would have been worth $40 million. According to Vox.com, if Trump had invested that $40 million in an S&P 500 index fund in 1974, and reinvested all the dividends, not cash out and paid no fees, by August of 2015 he would have been worth $3.4 billion.
As far as the bankruptcies, taking risks is exactly that, risk. Companies fail all the time, blaming someone who probably had very little actual contact with a company for its failure is silly. He has many more than 4 companies that succeeded, so his success rate is also way higher than yours.
It appears that industry is attacking it from the other side. You can have your distractions, we'll do the driving for you.
Personally, I think it will be great, how do you pull someone over for DWI if the car is doing the driving?
Even being able to drive 8 hours to visit family would be so much better if you could just sit and watch movies with the kids while the car drives itself.
Perhaps if he had paid his parking tickets he wouldn't have that issue. There was nothing there about the lack of wisdom of an iPhone cookie, just the lack of wisdom in baiting the police while having a warrant out for your arrest.
No, but the top of my tailgate is above the roof of most police cars.
What are your conditions for winning?
To leave the place in a better position than you found it.
In which case no war in history was ever won. Glad to hear how you feel, it definitely puts your opinion in perspective...as not meaning a damn thing.
What would be the conditions of winning in your world?
If Iraq wasn't a whole lot worse than it was when Saddam was running the place. Afghanistan is still going and the insurgency is just as strong as on day one 15 years ago. If that's your version of victory you're a fucking idiot.
I'm sure I'm the fucking idiot here, considering that by all measures the Taliban isn't in power, and are being forced to the negotiation table to lay down their arms, much like the FARC in Colombia.
Because she won't let him anywhere near her with that cock...he must have been to the cat house.
What I want to know is does Kepler have a fetish for gas giants or what?
I know I do...those sexy sexy gas giants. Oh, you were talking about the planets, nevermind.
This so much deserves a +1 troll mod, you just totally epically trolled a Slashdot employee. I tip my hat to you sir.
Already been investigated, it was found that men can't perform in zero G because of lack of blood pressure, so it is a no go.
It seems odd that that chart indicates resources as high, as in the cloud layer there are nearly no resources and getting to the ones on the surface would be difficult (to say the least...).
When you identify as a male to your wife and family, and identify as a female only at sports events
That sounds backwards. I can't imagine why anyone would want to be female at a sporting event, after all, it is the male bathroom that has no lines!
Out of curiosity, and because I really don't know the answer;
As a trans woman
Does that mean that you were born with danglies and would prefer you weren't? I am never sure which way this terminology goes.
I want to know what ride service is being offered for men where they won't be accused of rape without reason, and where they aren't at risk of being raped by man or woman. Also, I particularly have issue with the implication that only men can rape, and apparently this service believes that all men are rapists, so can't be trusted to drive women around. What is to stop a woman from raping another woman anyways?