I was merely pointing out that children use insults to belittle others. That or you never progressed socially since around middle school. So, the question is, who is acting more like an autist here? You insult someone you don't even know for no apparent reason, or me for pointing out your needless insults as coming from someone who is socially still in middle school.
I knew about piezoelectric effect in high school too, wow, aren't we special together. But I don't go around throwing insults at others to make myself feel better, while you do.
you nimrod high-school dropout.
I point out your needless insults, and you think I am insulting you? It is only an insult because you think you are being insulted, instead realize you are the one acting abnormal here, and I am the one trying to have an adult conversation. Perhaps when you learn the difference, maybe you can join the adult table.
It is good to hear they were cleared. That seemed like the politician/managers faithful fallback "someone must be to blame!" I hadn't heard about the outcome of the trial yet, thanks for the information.
What exactly makes me an acolyte to Mr D? When I posted, there were no visible comments, are you just jealous of us or something?
Show me a graph of the "electrical field" for a week before, during, and a week after, and prove your position. Science doesn't work on intuition, that is mysiticism. If you feel so strongly about this, PROVE IT!
Physics. the force that gravitation exerts upon a body, equal to the mass of the body times the local acceleration of gravity: commonly taken, in a region of constant gravitational acceleration, as a measure of mass.
The force being exerted on a boat or sub by gravity is not zero. The same amount of force is exerted on it if it is submerged, floating, or just sitting on the ground. However, the forces are in equilibrium, just as you standing on the ground are at equilibrium, and not sinking into the ground or floating away.
A Sub weighs an enormous amount, it doesn't matter if it is floating, sinking, or sitting on the ground, it weighs the same on Earth to a certain percent. It however will weigh differently on Mars, Jupiter, or floating in space. Therefore, SI defined mass, which does not equal weight. Weight changes based on the local gravity field, but mass does not. This is why mass is measured with a scale comparing two items, while weight is measured versus a deformation. Weight can be measured in water just as in air, you just measure the amount of water displaced.
I am glad you feel you can speak for the international scientific community, however, it seems that they don't agree with you. Weight is not equal to mass, it is defined based in Earth gravity for conversion, but that doesn't make them equal. Do you honestly expect things to weigh the same on the moon as Earth?
What the hell does that have to do with the FAA being interested or not in subs and other water craft?
FAA doesn't require certification of subs...because they don't fly.
Also, subs are not weightless even when floating, or else they would float up into the sky.
You are the one talking about the buoyancy of watercraft and trying to claim:
If buoyancy were included, ships and submarines would be weightless. As it is defined, ships weigh hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Even when floating, ships weigh a tremendous amount, they surely are not weightless or they would float off into the sky. They buoyancy only counteracts some of their weight, as they weigh less than water, but that hardly makes them weightless.
So, care to correct the facts I responded to in my first reply?
in the same way that the president doesn't have the authority to create executive orders
Of course the president has the authority to create executive orders, who else would you expect to create them? Now, he doesn't necessarily have the authority to write certain EOs, such as the most recent immigration one that tried to counteract federal law, but he most definitely has the authority to write EOs as that is how he lets executive agencies know how he wants them to run.
Also, subs/ships are not weightless, as they aren't floating in the air, they are floating in the water which means their weight can easily be measured.
We are talking about the FAA and their registration requirements, so, unless submarines or ships are flying through the air, the FAA just doesn't care about them. You could claim that they are flying through the water, but it doesn't matter, FAA only cares about >500ft above the ground/water.
Except the people claiming that the documents were classified have been shown to not only be lying about the classification level of the information contained in the documents, but even going so far as to alter documents then claiming that they contain classified data.
So, you have seen the actual classified reports? I am so glad you are privy to TS/SCI information, it makes me feel so much safer seeing someone posting all about it in a public forum. Quit while you are behind, you have nothing.
The purchase came with a contract requiring him to not publish the album for 88 years. Unless he is willing to break a contract where the other party is the Wu Tang clan, he has no choice but to not publish it. I wouldn't want to cross them, they are scary people.
She absolutely has no power to declassify material on her own that someone else classified. As an original classification authority, she would have the authority to classify (or not) material the state department produced, but not to declassify for instance surveillance produced by other departments. She wouldn't even be involved with the normal declassification process.
Don't make shit up, you just make yourself out to be ignorant.
Perhaps you should try reading more than CNN or MSNBC? There has been many emails that have been subsequently classified, as well as many emails that contained information that other agencies have indicated were marked as classified at some point. It isn't as cut and dried as "she did nothing wrong". I am glad that you have such insight into all of this that you can claim to know for fact that she did nothing illegal, however even the article I link here states this:
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
Slashdot Mirror
I was merely pointing out that children use insults to belittle others. That or you never progressed socially since around middle school. So, the question is, who is acting more like an autist here? You insult someone you don't even know for no apparent reason, or me for pointing out your needless insults as coming from someone who is socially still in middle school.
I knew about piezoelectric effect in high school too, wow, aren't we special together. But I don't go around throwing insults at others to make myself feel better, while you do.
you nimrod high-school dropout.
I point out your needless insults, and you think I am insulting you? It is only an insult because you think you are being insulted, instead realize you are the one acting abnormal here, and I am the one trying to have an adult conversation. Perhaps when you learn the difference, maybe you can join the adult table.
I think your tin foil hat might be a little tight.
No, mods can't tell who ACs are. I would assume you are the same person as it is a common thing being done by ACs.
It you want to differentiate yourself, make an account, otherwise you are the amorphous blob called AC.
It is good to hear they were cleared. That seemed like the politician/managers faithful fallback "someone must be to blame!" I hadn't heard about the outcome of the trial yet, thanks for the information.
Exactly!
What exactly makes me an acolyte to Mr D? When I posted, there were no visible comments, are you just jealous of us or something?
Show me a graph of the "electrical field" for a week before, during, and a week after, and prove your position. Science doesn't work on intuition, that is mysiticism. If you feel so strongly about this, PROVE IT!
Says the AC that apparently isn't even old enough to graduate yet.
So, you seem to think that you get to define what weight it. SI doesn't define weight, physics does. In physics, weight is defined as:
http://dictionary.reference.co...
Physics. the force that gravitation exerts upon a body, equal to the mass of the body times the local acceleration of gravity: commonly taken, in a region of constant gravitational acceleration, as a measure of mass.
The force being exerted on a boat or sub by gravity is not zero. The same amount of force is exerted on it if it is submerged, floating, or just sitting on the ground. However, the forces are in equilibrium, just as you standing on the ground are at equilibrium, and not sinking into the ground or floating away.
A Sub weighs an enormous amount, it doesn't matter if it is floating, sinking, or sitting on the ground, it weighs the same on Earth to a certain percent. It however will weigh differently on Mars, Jupiter, or floating in space. Therefore, SI defined mass, which does not equal weight. Weight changes based on the local gravity field, but mass does not. This is why mass is measured with a scale comparing two items, while weight is measured versus a deformation. Weight can be measured in water just as in air, you just measure the amount of water displaced.
I am glad you feel you can speak for the international scientific community, however, it seems that they don't agree with you. Weight is not equal to mass, it is defined based in Earth gravity for conversion, but that doesn't make them equal. Do you honestly expect things to weigh the same on the moon as Earth?
No.
By what mechanism do they expect stresses in rocks to produce electric fields?
What the hell does that have to do with the FAA being interested or not in subs and other water craft?
FAA doesn't require certification of subs...because they don't fly.
Also, subs are not weightless even when floating, or else they would float up into the sky.
You are the one talking about the buoyancy of watercraft and trying to claim:
If buoyancy were included, ships and submarines would be weightless. As it is defined, ships weigh hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Even when floating, ships weigh a tremendous amount, they surely are not weightless or they would float off into the sky. They buoyancy only counteracts some of their weight, as they weigh less than water, but that hardly makes them weightless.
So, care to correct the facts I responded to in my first reply?
Please show me your legal basis for saying:
in the same way that the president doesn't have the authority to create executive orders
Of course the president has the authority to create executive orders, who else would you expect to create them? Now, he doesn't necessarily have the authority to write certain EOs, such as the most recent immigration one that tried to counteract federal law, but he most definitely has the authority to write EOs as that is how he lets executive agencies know how he wants them to run.
Also, subs/ships are not weightless, as they aren't floating in the air, they are floating in the water which means their weight can easily be measured.
We are talking about the FAA and their registration requirements, so, unless submarines or ships are flying through the air, the FAA just doesn't care about them. You could claim that they are flying through the water, but it doesn't matter, FAA only cares about >500ft above the ground/water.
Snowden has never been accused of terrorism. If you are going to make claims like that, back your shit up with citations.
Same goes for Assange.
Making shit up to attack is silly when there is so much to point out that doesn't need to be made up.
The OPM breach seems pretty bad, it is all past and current applicants.
I got one of those small mailings with the tear off edges about this, it is around 2" x 6" if that helps.
If buoyancy were included, ships and submarines would be weightless. As it is defined, ships weigh hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Last I checked, Subs don't float in the air, and airships, while being a thing, aren't the type of ship you are speaking of.
The states force you to register and title a 1 lb aircraft now?
The FAA charges fees to register things in Canada?
Those geese must be nervous.
Except the people claiming that the documents were classified have been shown to not only be lying about the classification level of the information contained in the documents, but even going so far as to alter documents then claiming that they contain classified data.
So, you have seen the actual classified reports? I am so glad you are privy to TS/SCI information, it makes me feel so much safer seeing someone posting all about it in a public forum. Quit while you are behind, you have nothing.
http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...
They don't? Since when did this robot cease existing?
The purchase came with a contract requiring him to not publish the album for 88 years. Unless he is willing to break a contract where the other party is the Wu Tang clan, he has no choice but to not publish it. I wouldn't want to cross them, they are scary people.
Who else do you think works for minimum wage?
Do you realize that Walmart pays well over minimum wage to new employees? McDonald's gives you a raise above minimum after a few months.
She absolutely has no power to declassify material on her own that someone else classified. As an original classification authority, she would have the authority to classify (or not) material the state department produced, but not to declassify for instance surveillance produced by other departments. She wouldn't even be involved with the normal declassification process.
Don't make shit up, you just make yourself out to be ignorant.
http://www.politifact.com/trut...
Perhaps you should try reading more than CNN or MSNBC? There has been many emails that have been subsequently classified, as well as many emails that contained information that other agencies have indicated were marked as classified at some point. It isn't as cut and dried as "she did nothing wrong". I am glad that you have such insight into all of this that you can claim to know for fact that she did nothing illegal, however even the article I link here states this:
This is not to say Clinton’s email setup was allowed or appropriate -- for example, it skirted open records laws and presents challenges to archivists. And subsequent investigations may yield surprises or other unexpected evidence. But because of the way classification works and because of the incomplete record of her emails, we continue to reserve judgment.
in the developing world 70% will die from it or its complications and in the developing world 45%...
Did you perhaps mean developed on that second one? Otherwise I have to ask, which is it?