I have this issue. My desk is 5 feet from a thermostat that does nothing, and my desk is ALWAYS cold. In the summer I wear a sweatshirt to be comfortable. I would prefer that HVAC guys would actually do their job, as the point of climate control systems is to be comfortable, not make people work in too cold or too hot temperatures.
Unfortunately, fusion research has been laughably underfunded since that quote (which I can't seem to find on the internet, but someone has it I am sure).
My guess would be that most consumers don't even realize that it is not normal to have the reflections. They wouldn't even realize that a matte screen discourages reflections on the screen, thereby improving the picture in most lighting situations.
To most consumers, it is normal to watch movies in a darkened room without any other light sources.
First world is NATO aligned countries, second world is Soviet aligned countries, and third world is non aligned countries. You don't rise into the first world by improving conditions in the country, you do it by joining alliances.
Nobody else was allowed to nominate anybody in those categories.
That is entirely untrue.
Anyone could nominate, it just happened to be a voting bock of 300 who got a few slates nominated. The answer is not to have no award (despite good entries being nominated) by 3000 people (out of 5000).
So in other words, for 3 years of Clinton's time in State, it was well documented that ALL email was to be retained? Pretty different from the comment I was replying to that it was after she left State that the rules changed.
Her last day as Secretary of State was February 1, 2013.
Hint for you, unclassified is a classification. TS and S are also classifications. Anything marked with one of these labels is considered classified, Unclassified has much less handling restrictions though.
Did any of the republicans that supposedly did this transmit classified email over their personal servers after removing the classification markings (or having an aide do the federal law breaking part of removing the markings)?
I am getting very tired of this argument being trotted out like you know anything about the records retention laws. They have been around a VERY long time.
Except all the ones they found that were marked TS and were then somehow unmarked that this whole investigation is about, but I guess willful ignorance is what you prefer.
Really? Those being called out as SJWs are the ones I see marginalizing other's viewpoints. The whole thing about GG and anti-GG was the anti-GG people trying to shut down the other group rather than even discussing what they were saying. In this thing, you have the same thing, those who have subverted the voting system in order to shut down another person's viewpoint. These are the SJWs, the ones preferring to vote no award because they don't like the politics of those that were nominated. Hell, many of them didn't even read the entries and were bragging about it. How can you vote in a best of award without even reading the material?
Because you are a douchbag, no one should believe anything you say.
That is the fallacy being used above. "I don't like this source, so the information MUST be untrue!" It is a false statement, either the information is true or false, but the source doesn't make it either.
Keep reading the rest of the amendment, and you will find that it actually prevents congress from restricting anyone's ownership of "arms". Arms being the nebulous term it is for very good reason.
Slashdot Mirror
I have this issue. My desk is 5 feet from a thermostat that does nothing, and my desk is ALWAYS cold. In the summer I wear a sweatshirt to be comfortable. I would prefer that HVAC guys would actually do their job, as the point of climate control systems is to be comfortable, not make people work in too cold or too hot temperatures.
They could always equip the court room with 802.11 that is randomly turned on and off.
You can't have stored wind or solar for anywhere near the cost of fission, why set the goal posts so low for fusion?
Energy storage is very expensive, it isn't just around the corner from being affordable.
We're also not the professionals that keep telling us it's 30 years away
with a certain amount of funding. Without the funding, the researchers have said it will never happen.
http://focusfusion.org/index.p...
Unfortunately, fusion research has been laughably underfunded since that quote (which I can't seem to find on the internet, but someone has it I am sure).
If she had, the case would be destruction of evidence and illegal records destruction (under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 33)
My guess would be that most consumers don't even realize that it is not normal to have the reflections. They wouldn't even realize that a matte screen discourages reflections on the screen, thereby improving the picture in most lighting situations.
To most consumers, it is normal to watch movies in a darkened room without any other light sources.
17% dividend of what? 17% of the GDP/person? Where would the money come from?
System? 2.2 Sqm is the size of individual mirrors in the system, not the whole system. There are 100 mirrors in the system (at least).
When did South Africa join NATO?
http://www.nato.int/cps/en/nat...
Oh, it didn't.
http://www.nationsonline.org/o...
First world is NATO aligned countries, second world is Soviet aligned countries, and third world is non aligned countries. You don't rise into the first world by improving conditions in the country, you do it by joining alliances.
Nobody else was allowed to nominate anybody in those categories.
That is entirely untrue.
Anyone could nominate, it just happened to be a voting bock of 300 who got a few slates nominated. The answer is not to have no award (despite good entries being nominated) by 3000 people (out of 5000).
So in other words, for 3 years of Clinton's time in State, it was well documented that ALL email was to be retained? Pretty different from the comment I was replying to that it was after she left State that the rules changed.
Her last day as Secretary of State was February 1, 2013.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
An water efficiency law being voted on for the EPA?
What does that have to do with records retention laws that were in place before Hilary took over as Secretary of State?
Hint for you, unclassified is a classification. TS and S are also classifications. Anything marked with one of these labels is considered classified, Unclassified has much less handling restrictions though.
Did any of the republicans that supposedly did this transmit classified email over their personal servers after removing the classification markings (or having an aide do the federal law breaking part of removing the markings)?
I fully intend to vote Deez Nuts for president!
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/21/...
Bull Shit.
I am getting very tired of this argument being trotted out like you know anything about the records retention laws. They have been around a VERY long time.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
The documents were not classified at the time.
Except all the ones they found that were marked TS and were then somehow unmarked that this whole investigation is about, but I guess willful ignorance is what you prefer.
Really? Those being called out as SJWs are the ones I see marginalizing other's viewpoints. The whole thing about GG and anti-GG was the anti-GG people trying to shut down the other group rather than even discussing what they were saying. In this thing, you have the same thing, those who have subverted the voting system in order to shut down another person's viewpoint. These are the SJWs, the ones preferring to vote no award because they don't like the politics of those that were nominated. Hell, many of them didn't even read the entries and were bragging about it. How can you vote in a best of award without even reading the material?
http://whatever.scalzi.com/201...
http://whatever.scalzi.com/201...
Yes, there was an organized "vote no award" block.
Because you are a douchbag, no one should believe anything you say.
That is the fallacy being used above. "I don't like this source, so the information MUST be untrue!" It is a false statement, either the information is true or false, but the source doesn't make it either.
shall not be infringed
I am thinking of the cannon used in the war and trying to figure out how you would hunt with them. Chain shot?
That has got to be the funniest thing I have read today. Thank you.
You got the joke I was trying to make though.
Keep reading the rest of the amendment, and you will find that it actually prevents congress from restricting anyone's ownership of "arms". Arms being the nebulous term it is for very good reason.
Are you giving evidence in agreement with what AC said? That ruling should be looked at in that way as it is essentially what the Justice said.