As above, that issue is not Netflix, that is your ISP. Netflix looks like a Bluray on my TV running through the Tivo as a player on Verizon FiOS 75/75Mbit, so if you have those issues on your Gb, your ISP is intentionally throttling Netflix to decrease your experience with them and shift you to their offerings.
As for other people putting up their work, that should be handled by a DMCA takedown according to the official procedures, but Alphabet is kind enough to offer the compromise of Content ID with personalized settings on how to share the profits.
Yeah, but when you refuse to takedown items after being notified of infringing content, you should kind of expect to be prosecuted under the local laws.
Did I say anything about age of consent? It is always illegal for an adult to have sex with an underage person, but what does that have to do with 12 year olds having sex with each other?
I find it absolutely hilarious you call me regressive-left...clearly you haven't read any of my history.
Nobody is encouraging 12yo boys to go fuck girls. That would be 'rape culture', 'un-feminist' and 'hetero-normative'. There is no reason to ban a non-existing practice.
No, that wouldn't be rape, two 12 year olds having sex is perfectly legal in the US, there is no rape involved unless someone is forced against their will. Statutory rape is involved when an adult is having sex with an underage person, but that is due to power imbalance. There is no law against two consenting children having sex with each other.
Although there is a trend to incite children, especially boys, to be homosexual or trans.
Um, no, there is no incitement, there is an allowing kids to do what is normal for kids to do. If they are attracted to the same sex, who are you, or the Russian government to tell them they are not allowed?
Promoting homosexuality and trans-fetish to children is how they grow their rank to secure political gain. It is basically state sponsored child abuse.
No one is promoting anything but you, you are promoting disinformation. The kids are ALREADY GAY, not being perverted into being gay, no one forced them to be gay.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Privacy is a specifically enumerated right, just like the right to bear arms. It isn't any less or more of a right, it is the right of every single US citizen. HOWEVER, nothing in that amendment states that the external contents of a letter (the to and from addresses, etc) are protected. In this case, the FBI is asking for the ability to read the outside of all the envelopes you send through the internet to your friends (etc).
"Towing being necessary for my Boy Scout troop, I bought a truck."
That isn't the only reason for my truck, just one of the reasons. Where in the sentence you quote does it say there are no other reasons?
Also, the Militia was every able bodied male aged 12-60, so sure, let's restrict the second to those people, after all, that is more people than current laws allow to carry.
If the 12 yo boy is gay, who is to stop them? That is like saying that a 12 yo isn't allowed to date the opposite sex because you think that dating is wrong. 12 Year olds are old enough to have started puberty and to know which way their sexual orientation is.
Well, just look who Russia labels terrorists. They label people in Syria terrorists who are rising against a vicious dictator who was killing their people. Putin supports said vicious dictator as he is as much a vicious dictator when it comes to the Caucasus, Crimeans, Chechens, and other groups. Maybe they should just ban any group that starts with C...
You bring up all these things about Trump, without even an acknowledgement that Hillary is just as bad, if not worse. She has done all these things and more, so what is your point?
I'm not moving the goalposts, the homosexual lobby is moving the goalposts. It wasn't good enough to have Civil Unions allowed, it had to say marriage contract on the sheet of paper. Marriage is a religious ceremony in the Christian church, it is not a secular thing. It doesn't matter if the US has adopted the term, it is still a religious ceremony that the US government has no authority over, so shouldn't be ruling one way or another.
Freedom of religion is a thing in the US, not freedom from religion.
If marriage is a secular thing, why did they steal the term, and why is there a distinction between civil unions and marriage?
You are arguing about something from the side of ignorance. You claim that civil unions are the same as marriage, but clearly they aren't or there would be no need for homosexual marriage instead of homosexual civil unions. Civil unions date back to 2000 in the US state of Vermont. Homosexual Marriage is a new thing in the past few years. They are separate things that were supposed to be equal, but never achieved this, but yet rather than fix the issue, marriage was taken away from the Christian churches and forced to be open to homosexuals. Marriage is the term for the ceremony in Christianity, Kiddushin for the contract and Nissu'in or Chupah for the ceremony in Judaism, why not use those terms? The terms in Islam are nikah and zawaj, why not use those? Why take the Christian terms and use them for a civil ceremony with no religious backing?
I doubt it is even possible for a presidential candidate to get 269 electoral votes to tie for the presidency. Or did you think the popular vote elected presidents?
Slashdot Mirror
Um, Apple scammed everyone, Amazon was forced to sell books for higher prices. Amazon, B&N, etc didn't break the law, Apple did.
You were scammed by Apple, even if you were buying a book from one of the other sellers.
How do you know how much you received? I got notified by B&N but nothing from Amazon.
How would it be possible to evade any taxes? It isn't like Musk can go sell the new Tesla stocks and not pay any taxes on them.
As above, that issue is not Netflix, that is your ISP. Netflix looks like a Bluray on my TV running through the Tivo as a player on Verizon FiOS 75/75Mbit, so if you have those issues on your Gb, your ISP is intentionally throttling Netflix to decrease your experience with them and shift you to their offerings.
Blame your ISP, that isn't a Netflix issue.
I would say they are engaging with YouTube pretty strongly:
https://www.youtube.com/user/t...
https://www.youtube.com/user/U...
https://www.youtube.com/user/k...
https://www.youtube.com/user/P...
Not sure why they are whining, but if I were Alphabet, I would remove all the music from every one of them until this dispute is settled.
In this case, since the artist themselves puts up their videos, don't you think they have already agreed to the profit sharing that Youtube offers?
https://www.youtube.com/user/t...
https://www.youtube.com/user/U...
https://www.youtube.com/user/k...
https://www.youtube.com/user/P...
As for other people putting up their work, that should be handled by a DMCA takedown according to the official procedures, but Alphabet is kind enough to offer the compromise of Content ID with personalized settings on how to share the profits.
You mean like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Look at the description, contains all the links for iTunes, Google Play, etc.
Yeah, but when you refuse to takedown items after being notified of infringing content, you should kind of expect to be prosecuted under the local laws.
Did I say anything about age of consent? It is always illegal for an adult to have sex with an underage person, but what does that have to do with 12 year olds having sex with each other?
I find it absolutely hilarious you call me regressive-left...clearly you haven't read any of my history.
Nobody is encouraging 12yo boys to go fuck girls. That would be 'rape culture', 'un-feminist' and 'hetero-normative'. There is no reason to ban a non-existing practice.
No, that wouldn't be rape, two 12 year olds having sex is perfectly legal in the US, there is no rape involved unless someone is forced against their will. Statutory rape is involved when an adult is having sex with an underage person, but that is due to power imbalance. There is no law against two consenting children having sex with each other.
Although there is a trend to incite children, especially boys, to be homosexual or trans.
Um, no, there is no incitement, there is an allowing kids to do what is normal for kids to do. If they are attracted to the same sex, who are you, or the Russian government to tell them they are not allowed?
Promoting homosexuality and trans-fetish to children is how they grow their rank to secure political gain. It is basically state sponsored child abuse.
No one is promoting anything but you, you are promoting disinformation. The kids are ALREADY GAY, not being perverted into being gay, no one forced them to be gay.
Except, that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to the external contents of a piece of mail, or in this case email to and from and date.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/co...
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Privacy is a specifically enumerated right, just like the right to bear arms. It isn't any less or more of a right, it is the right of every single US citizen. HOWEVER, nothing in that amendment states that the external contents of a letter (the to and from addresses, etc) are protected. In this case, the FBI is asking for the ability to read the outside of all the envelopes you send through the internet to your friends (etc).
Bullshit.
"Towing being necessary for my Boy Scout troop, I bought a truck."
That isn't the only reason for my truck, just one of the reasons. Where in the sentence you quote does it say there are no other reasons?
Also, the Militia was every able bodied male aged 12-60, so sure, let's restrict the second to those people, after all, that is more people than current laws allow to carry.
With an area between them and the US that closely resembles Mad Max.
If the 12 yo boy is gay, who is to stop them? That is like saying that a 12 yo isn't allowed to date the opposite sex because you think that dating is wrong. 12 Year olds are old enough to have started puberty and to know which way their sexual orientation is.
So, you are saying that the proper course of action is to instead force a child that knows they should be female from being who they believe they are?
You don't understand this, this is allowing the child to live a happy life, not forcing the child to do something against their will.
Well, just look who Russia labels terrorists. They label people in Syria terrorists who are rising against a vicious dictator who was killing their people. Putin supports said vicious dictator as he is as much a vicious dictator when it comes to the Caucasus, Crimeans, Chechens, and other groups. Maybe they should just ban any group that starts with C...
You bring up all these things about Trump, without even an acknowledgement that Hillary is just as bad, if not worse. She has done all these things and more, so what is your point?
Feel the Johnson!
Julian Assange raped a woman, trying to claim it is a honeypot is so far from the truth to be completely laughable.
Noone is praising Russia, you drooling moron.
You haven't been reading MobSwatter's posts have you?
I'm not moving the goalposts, the homosexual lobby is moving the goalposts. It wasn't good enough to have Civil Unions allowed, it had to say marriage contract on the sheet of paper. Marriage is a religious ceremony in the Christian church, it is not a secular thing. It doesn't matter if the US has adopted the term, it is still a religious ceremony that the US government has no authority over, so shouldn't be ruling one way or another.
Freedom of religion is a thing in the US, not freedom from religion.
If marriage is a secular thing, why did they steal the term, and why is there a distinction between civil unions and marriage?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.legalmatch.com/law-...
You are arguing about something from the side of ignorance. You claim that civil unions are the same as marriage, but clearly they aren't or there would be no need for homosexual marriage instead of homosexual civil unions. Civil unions date back to 2000 in the US state of Vermont. Homosexual Marriage is a new thing in the past few years. They are separate things that were supposed to be equal, but never achieved this, but yet rather than fix the issue, marriage was taken away from the Christian churches and forced to be open to homosexuals. Marriage is the term for the ceremony in Christianity, Kiddushin for the contract and Nissu'in or Chupah for the ceremony in Judaism, why not use those terms? The terms in Islam are nikah and zawaj, why not use those? Why take the Christian terms and use them for a civil ceremony with no religious backing?
I doubt it is even possible for a presidential candidate to get 269 electoral votes to tie for the presidency. Or did you think the popular vote elected presidents?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
That video appears to tell you what happens in a tie situation, if it were to ever happen.
http://www.etymonline.com/inde...
Look into the history of the word.
Religion is a red herring in this and an attempt to shift the goalposts.
You mean like shifting the goalposts from civil unions to marriage?
No one was forced to buy non voting shares or shares with less of a vote than Zuck's shares.