If you're asking someone to absorb fluff (like nonsense about aliens) then perhaps it's a good idea to manufacture 'disfluency' with odd fonts and the like.
If you're asking someone to absorb difficult material (like Knuth or advanced physics) then you want to minimize other sources of 'disfluency'.
You might see instances of vexatious surveillance. Imagine a group of people like the fine folks at 4chan with their hands on this technology, using the tech to stalk individuals the 4chan group mind has decided to go after.
Some people will be getting much more attention from this system than others, I'm guessing.
The brits are using a time-proven formula to make their citizens demand previously unpopular policies. It's called Problem-Reaction-Solution.
Once a problem is allowed to get bad enough (say, crime) there will be a reaction from the enraged populace, and they will eagerly embrace the solution (say, snitching) offered by the people who engineered the problem to begin with.
Governments do it again and again because the public falls for it every time.
It's practically a given that TEMPEST-like capabilities moved to satellites, decades ago.
Combine that with ECHELON or something like it, and everything that everyone is displaying on their screens (Internet-connected or not) is probably being hoovered up by at least one intelligence agency. Including what's on the screens of those precious Blackberries.
ReadWriteWeb blogged about FaceBook and was promptly overwhelmed with confused FaceBook users who, apparently, are in the habit of getting to the FaceBook login screen by way of Google. Read the comments - it's hysterical.
In theory, you'd think this would be the case. In practice, most people filing on April 15th are filing to get their money back, not send money in.
There are actually no incentives for governments to make it easier for taxpayers to get refunds. Taxpayers can create those incentives by reducing their withholdings to $0 so that they owe the government on April 15th rather than the other way around. Given California's problems, that seems like a pretty good idea anyway.
use Trauma Based Mind Control to split off multiple personalities. Interrogate the terrorist all you want; you'll never get the information because the memories are hidden in another alter.
Assange and his staff are probably experiencing COINTELPRO style conspicuous surveillance and harassment campaigns (sometimes misleadingly called "organized stalking"). The agents would be going out of the way to let Assange's people know that they were being followed and surveilled, using techniques such as public messages that conveyed highly personal information from their lives. The highly personal and embarrasing information revealed in the conspicuous surveillance would be of such a nature that the target(s) would not want to talk about the details.
That would explain why they were being 'vague' and 'conspiratorial' in their explanations.
RF radiation affects tissues differently from, say, infrared or X-ray radiation. For example, the Active Denial System (at 95 Ghz) acts on water just beneath the surface of the skin because the extremely high frequency RF vibrates electric dipoles more quickly. A microwave oven's RF (2.45 Ghz) penetrates a couple of inches. 30 Mhz RF, of the type that doctors use to deep heat body tissue, penetrates all the way through.
The bottom line is that we have environmental hazards which have not existed except for the last 50 years in a very long evolutionary history. The upper atmosphere filters out most of the kinds of RF that we now willingly bombard ourselves with. There's very little data one way or the other. The fact that the cellphone companies are resisting even the tiniest concession to consumer demands for more information suggests that the cellphone companies are afraid of that information. Maybe they know something you don't.
You're wrong. Shielding which is effective against high frequency electric fields can also be effective against high frequency magnetic fields. The changing magnetic field induces eddy currents in the shielding which creates opposing magnetic fields, shaping and directing the intruding magnetic field.
Lower magnetic fields can also be shaped with high permeability materials.
Here is a helpful link which explains the issues surrounding electric/magnetic shielding in more detail.
"A 2002 study by Genesis Laboratories Inc. does lend some credence to the ability of electronic repellent devices to repel certain pests in controlled environments. Preliminary study of white-footed mice behavior in the test apparatus demonstrated a significant preference for the non-activated chamber among both sexes."
Also, how do you think your microwave oven works? It uses dielectric heating to rapidly vibrate (and thereby heat) the water molecules in food. Guess what - dielectric heating works on you too, and there is no cut-off range; even low frequency RF has some dielectric heating effect on the water and some body tissues.
And dielectric heating can cause cataracts.
Just throwing some actual facts into this discussion.
The purpose of such clothing is not to afford the wearer absolute protection or provide a cloak of invulnerability, as it were. The purpose is to neutralize the weaponry - which is intended to inflict invisible pain on the recipient. If induction heating causes the shirt to burst into flames, the pain is no longer invisible. That sort of thing doesn't look good for the cameras.
The article says iron-laced ink or paint. So, actually, if you were in a building with conductive paint coating the walls, your eyes would be protected too.
It's not just about 'bad guys'. It's about the web of control you get sucked into.
Re:If you knew what was really going on...
on
A History of Wiretapping
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
I don't have secret knowledge about the government. I just have personal experience with stuff that most people don't believe exists. And there are quite a few others in my boat. This experience is a form of 'secret knowledge', perhaps, but unlike secret knowledge it can't be transfered because until you share my experiences, you can't really understand it.
Patiently trying to explain to you and other readers, who haven't experienced what I and others like me have experienced, what's really going on... well, that'll blow what tiny scraps of credibility I've managed to accumulate in this thread.
There will be developments in the coming months that will be cause for me to post more information about this program, because the public's awareness will be broadened. Slashdot hasn't seen the last of me. (Is that a threat, or a promise? Cue the Slashdot laugh track...)
I guess this is another one of those techie witticisms I was warned about before I posted here.
I do have good news for a few people on this thread. The targeting isn't random. It either happens to you because you cross the wrong person - and that doesn't happen when you spend 24/7 futzing with computers at work or at home and eating cheetos - or because you're ex-military and you get selected for experimentation, or because you're beholden to no one and unusually gifted.
I've been browsing selected comment histories and I think I can safely say, you're not going to be targeted under this program as it's being run right now.
So go back to sleep.
Re:If you knew what was really going on...
on
A History of Wiretapping
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
If your government turned into a dictatorship, would there be an announcement to that effect in the papers or on TV? Why would they do that, when it is so much more effective to convince everyone they're still free, and get their enthusiastic cooperation for free? The handful (actually more than a handful) of dissidents and other troublemakers who want true freedom can be targeted.
If there were armed soldiers following your politicians everywhere they went with guns to their heads as they signed papers, you'd immediately recognize it as a military dictatorship. But what if the guns are several hundred or thousand miles away, and the gunshot is invisible? What if heart attacks or strokes can be induced electronically at will, and the only consideration is whether the target will comply with the implied threat, and if not, whether the target can be killed with deniability? Would that fit your definition of a military dictatorship?
When Dick Cheney had his well publicized heart problems in office, maybe you should revisit what message was really being sent. Maybe the people who order Dick Cheney around like an errand boy were telling the world, "If Dick died on the operating table, nobody would question it. His life is in our hands. We own him."
Maybe the government doesn't work the way you think it does. Maybe your leaders aren't in control and can't possibly be in control. Maybe the smart ones understand this, and decide to make the best of a bad situation by selling out.
That's all I'm prepared to say today. There's a lot more to the high tech persecution/torture/blackmail/murder angle than I've alluded to here.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're asking someone to absorb fluff (like nonsense about aliens) then perhaps it's a good idea to manufacture 'disfluency' with odd fonts and the like.
If you're asking someone to absorb difficult material (like Knuth or advanced physics) then you want to minimize other sources of 'disfluency'.
And isn't high frequency electrical noise carried over high power lines a threat to our health?
http://areyoutargeted.com/fighting-back/public-relations/making-your-case/eh-and-health/
You might see instances of vexatious surveillance. Imagine a group of people like the fine folks at 4chan with their hands on this technology, using the tech to stalk individuals the 4chan group mind has decided to go after.
Some people will be getting much more attention from this system than others, I'm guessing.
The brits are using a time-proven formula to make their citizens demand previously unpopular policies. It's called Problem-Reaction-Solution. Once a problem is allowed to get bad enough (say, crime) there will be a reaction from the enraged populace, and they will eagerly embrace the solution (say, snitching) offered by the people who engineered the problem to begin with. Governments do it again and again because the public falls for it every time.
Uh, the intelligence sector is way ahead of what the public gets to read about. They've had it for some time.
Right, what they're really annoyed about is being left out of the spying loop.
It's practically a given that TEMPEST-like capabilities moved to satellites, decades ago. Combine that with ECHELON or something like it, and everything that everyone is displaying on their screens (Internet-connected or not) is probably being hoovered up by at least one intelligence agency. Including what's on the screens of those precious Blackberries.
It's
ReadWriteWeb blogged about FaceBook and was promptly overwhelmed with confused FaceBook users who, apparently, are in the habit of getting to the FaceBook login screen by way of Google. Read the comments - it's hysterical.
It won't get you "into trouble", but you may owe a 10% penalty on the underreported taxes if the amount is large enough.
In theory, you'd think this would be the case. In practice, most people filing on April 15th are filing to get their money back, not send money in.
There are actually no incentives for governments to make it easier for taxpayers to get refunds. Taxpayers can create those incentives by reducing their withholdings to $0 so that they owe the government on April 15th rather than the other way around. Given California's problems, that seems like a pretty good idea anyway.
Where's the money in that?
Whereas there's always money in war profiteering and the latest thing, security profiteering.
(Until the money runs out...)
use Trauma Based Mind Control to split off multiple personalities. Interrogate the terrorist all you want; you'll never get the information because the memories are hidden in another alter.
What if someone powerful or wealthy is an exact match, and really needs some healthy organs? Think accidents can't be arranged for the right price?
Assange and his staff are probably experiencing COINTELPRO style conspicuous surveillance and harassment campaigns (sometimes misleadingly called "organized stalking"). The agents would be going out of the way to let Assange's people know that they were being followed and surveilled, using techniques such as public messages that conveyed highly personal information from their lives. The highly personal and embarrasing information revealed in the conspicuous surveillance would be of such a nature that the target(s) would not want to talk about the details.
That would explain why they were being 'vague' and 'conspiratorial' in their explanations.
RF radiation affects tissues differently from, say, infrared or X-ray radiation. For example, the Active Denial System (at 95 Ghz) acts on water just beneath the surface of the skin because the extremely high frequency RF vibrates electric dipoles more quickly. A microwave oven's RF (2.45 Ghz) penetrates a couple of inches. 30 Mhz RF, of the type that doctors use to deep heat body tissue, penetrates all the way through.
The bottom line is that we have environmental hazards which have not existed except for the last 50 years in a very long evolutionary history. The upper atmosphere filters out most of the kinds of RF that we now willingly bombard ourselves with. There's very little data one way or the other. The fact that the cellphone companies are resisting even the tiniest concession to consumer demands for more information suggests that the cellphone companies are afraid of that information. Maybe they know something you don't.
You're wrong. Shielding which is effective against high frequency electric fields can also be effective against high frequency magnetic fields. The changing magnetic field induces eddy currents in the shielding which creates opposing magnetic fields, shaping and directing the intruding magnetic field.
Lower magnetic fields can also be shaped with high permeability materials.
Here is a helpful link which explains the issues surrounding electric/magnetic shielding in more detail.
http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/emc/tutorials/Shielding02/Practical_Shielding.html
There's some evidence that high frequency noise or high frequency RF has biological effects even if it's non-ionizing. For example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_pest_control
"A 2002 study by Genesis Laboratories Inc. does lend some credence to the ability of electronic repellent devices to repel certain pests in controlled environments. Preliminary study of white-footed mice behavior in the test apparatus demonstrated a significant preference for the non-activated chamber among both sexes."
Also, how do you think your microwave oven works? It uses dielectric heating to rapidly vibrate (and thereby heat) the water molecules in food. Guess what - dielectric heating works on you too, and there is no cut-off range; even low frequency RF has some dielectric heating effect on the water and some body tissues.
And dielectric heating can cause cataracts.
Just throwing some actual facts into this discussion.
The purpose of such clothing is not to afford the wearer absolute protection or provide a cloak of invulnerability, as it were. The purpose is to neutralize the weaponry - which is intended to inflict invisible pain on the recipient. If induction heating causes the shirt to burst into flames, the pain is no longer invisible. That sort of thing doesn't look good for the cameras.
The article says iron-laced ink or paint. So, actually, if you were in a building with conductive paint coating the walls, your eyes would be protected too.
Here's how to create microwave-resistant clothing.
To control something, you have to watch it.
It's not just about 'bad guys'. It's about the web of control you get sucked into.
I don't have secret knowledge about the government. I just have personal experience with stuff that most people don't believe exists. And there are quite a few others in my boat. This experience is a form of 'secret knowledge', perhaps, but unlike secret knowledge it can't be transfered because until you share my experiences, you can't really understand it.
Patiently trying to explain to you and other readers, who haven't experienced what I and others like me have experienced, what's really going on... well, that'll blow what tiny scraps of credibility I've managed to accumulate in this thread.
There will be developments in the coming months that will be cause for me to post more information about this program, because the public's awareness will be broadened. Slashdot hasn't seen the last of me. (Is that a threat, or a promise? Cue the Slashdot laugh track...)
I guess this is another one of those techie witticisms I was warned about before I posted here.
I do have good news for a few people on this thread. The targeting isn't random. It either happens to you because you cross the wrong person - and that doesn't happen when you spend 24/7 futzing with computers at work or at home and eating cheetos - or because you're ex-military and you get selected for experimentation, or because you're beholden to no one and unusually gifted.
I've been browsing selected comment histories and I think I can safely say, you're not going to be targeted under this program as it's being run right now.
So go back to sleep.
If your government turned into a dictatorship, would there be an announcement to that effect in the papers or on TV? Why would they do that, when it is so much more effective to convince everyone they're still free, and get their enthusiastic cooperation for free? The handful (actually more than a handful) of dissidents and other troublemakers who want true freedom can be targeted.
If there were armed soldiers following your politicians everywhere they went with guns to their heads as they signed papers, you'd immediately recognize it as a military dictatorship. But what if the guns are several hundred or thousand miles away, and the gunshot is invisible? What if heart attacks or strokes can be induced electronically at will, and the only consideration is whether the target will comply with the implied threat, and if not, whether the target can be killed with deniability? Would that fit your definition of a military dictatorship?
When Dick Cheney had his well publicized heart problems in office, maybe you should revisit what message was really being sent. Maybe the people who order Dick Cheney around like an errand boy were telling the world, "If Dick died on the operating table, nobody would question it. His life is in our hands. We own him."
Maybe the government doesn't work the way you think it does. Maybe your leaders aren't in control and can't possibly be in control. Maybe the smart ones understand this, and decide to make the best of a bad situation by selling out.
That's all I'm prepared to say today. There's a lot more to the high tech persecution/torture/blackmail/murder angle than I've alluded to here.