Slashdot Mirror


User: pgmrdlm

pgmrdlm's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
819
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 819

  1. Re:Oh please on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0, Troll

    Its also a way to identify fucking bigots. Just watch the fucking bigoted comments that appear on this forum.

    How many Niger comments do you see posted here. How many people are openly anti gay.Sorry, bull shit argument. To many posters here should never be hired because of their bigoted attitudes. And all you are doing is supporting them.

    By stating that things they make public should not be public to the companies they work for. Double standard here?

  2. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0, Troll

    You do realize coward that the parent is a primary example of why companies SHOULD be data mining FaceBook and other web sites about their employees. MaskedSlacker is a primary example of someone that should not be hired based on his online postings.

    Postings such as that show the possibility of hostility to fellow workers or customers because of their sexual preferences. How many customers will be lost because of this hostility. Will MaskedSlacker attack someone they work with because he doesn't agree with their sexual preference.

    But in typical slash dot mentality, nobody cares about that. But everyone here will be the first to complain when masked slacker or someone like them does cause law suits or harm to someone. The company should have recognized the behavior. The company should have never hired the person.

    Your an idiot.

  3. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why? Because I don't hold your views? To bad coward.

  4. Re:Oh please on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0

    Provide links. Prove it.

  5. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  6. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0, Troll

    Typical hypocrite slash doter. Run to bigoted comments when all else fails.

    Do you type Niger and fagot as a AC because your a fucking coward to?

    This I freely say and am more than willing for anyone to see, including where I work. The only good bigot is a dead one. I would pay to watch the people you seem to hate so much kill you in the most painful way.

  7. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And you should be the first to be worried about companies checking online postings. You freely admitted to backing illegal activities. Hope you lose your job over your postings. Public postings are for anyone to read.

  8. Re:The new "rationality" test. I support this test on "Pre-Crime" Comes To the HR Dept. · · Score: -1, Troll

    Why don't you tell that to the families of people that have died from work violence. You know, the type that show up with a gun and start shooting people. Want to bet many had good job performance reviews?

    Bet you don't care about those people though do you. Let them die is your motto. Just don't fuck with anything that YOU consider private. EVEN if you post it online.

    I can understand the argument of people getting set up. All I have to do is look at fuck wads like you to see that possibility. But to arrogantly say, all that matters is job performance?

    Asshole. Seriously, what a mother fucking asshole.

  9. Re:Sheesh! on NASA Data Reveals China's Industrial Air Pollution · · Score: 1

    Who's angry. Your a pussy and not worth the trouble.

  10. Re:Perverting the course of justice. on Man Gets 12-Year Jail Sentence For Planting Child Porn On Enemy's Computer · · Score: 1

    Again, no links for consideration and verification.

  11. Re:Sheesh! on NASA Data Reveals China's Industrial Air Pollution · · Score: 1

    Your momma ever tell you she wished your father cum on her face instead of in her pussy because she knew you would grow up to be a pussy yourself.

  12. Re:Sheesh! on NASA Data Reveals China's Industrial Air Pollution · · Score: 1

    Ok asshole, your rebutal.

    We wanted the population to be free, not repressed.

    They still arn't free, and they still are repressed.
    Repression and Violence Against Journalists in China on Increase
    http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/42042/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/movies/01spring.html

    CENSORSHIP has long been a fact of life for filmmakers in China, but in recent years no director has clashed with the Chinese authorities as often, or as visibly, as Lou Ye. At two of the last five editions of the Cannes Film Festival, with the global media spotlight trained on the south of France, Mr. Lou, 45, has walked up the red carpet to present a movie that was being screened, in competition, without the permission of the Film Bureau in Beijing.

    Every one of those were easily found by doing a google search.

    Now along with having the largest population in the world still not being free, they are all becoming sick from all the polution from their industrialization.

    China's 'cancer villages' reveal dark side of economic boom
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/07/china-cancer-villages-industrial-pollution

    Would you like to try again with your comment about westerners and china.

  13. Re:actually, towns aren't all-powerful on Long Island Town Enacts Tough Cell Tower Limits · · Score: 1

    1). No harm has been proved by those radio emissions. There is not a credible report anywhere stating otherwise.

    2). If they felt there was an issue(the city), they should have never allowed cell service allowed in the city. Please see other individual posts regrading the placement requirement of cell towers.

    3). How many of the individuals that supported this ordinance own cell phones and place said devices right next to their heads. They have by these actions removed all credibility in their arguments about the cell phone towers. If you can show me that every individual of the town counsel and the parents that proposed this ordinance do not use cell phones. Than I wouldn't consider them hypocritical in their position.

    Look, if I thought people were becoming sick from cell towers and or the cell phones that use them. I would not arguing the points. I don't want anyone to become sick. Hell, I wouldn't continue owning a cell phone or using one.

  14. Re:why would you think that? on Why Warriors, Not Geeks, Run US Cyber Command Posts · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You really haven't a clue do you? Seriously? You would insult someone because of the job they choose? How about this, I think your a racist based on your coming to this forum.

  15. Re:actually, towns aren't all-powerful on Long Island Town Enacts Tough Cell Tower Limits · · Score: 1
    What was once available has now been removed. I would sue the city because they had willfully degraded a service previously provided.

    If the cell phone companies never provided service, nothing would have been lost.

    You have no argument.

  16. Re:waaaaaah waaaaaahhhhh on Long Island Town Enacts Tough Cell Tower Limits · · Score: 1

    I'll take you up on that. Give me your email, and I will email you both my name and address. Bring a gun, because I will be waiting with one.

  17. Re:actually, towns aren't all-powerful on Long Island Town Enacts Tough Cell Tower Limits · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Move back into your cave. Get that rotary phone out because that is all they will have for communication after these types of votes. Better yet, everyone buy a radio for their car because nobody will be able to call 9/11 when they have accidents.

    Thank you fucking asshole mike for making it much more possible for people to die. Fucking cunt.

  18. Re:The Fall Classic and 2" quad on Bing Crosby, Television Sports Preservationist · · Score: 1

    What, you trying to prove your a real geek and don't like any sports? Bet your in the minority here. But wait, the NAACP will protect you.

  19. Re:Perverting the course of justice. on Man Gets 12-Year Jail Sentence For Planting Child Porn On Enemy's Computer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Prove it, back up your statement with statistics(government) to prove thats where all those millionaires came from. Please have the decency to provide the same credible sources to back up yours.

  20. Re:Perverting the course of justice. on Man Gets 12-Year Jail Sentence For Planting Child Porn On Enemy's Computer · · Score: -1, Troll
    Another pussy pissed off because he wasn't one of the new millionaires that were created during the Reagan years. Thus, the pussy is pissed off at everyone else that got ahead during that time and is now trying to take their achievements away from them.

    Here you go dumb fuck. Statistical data showing the explosion in millionaires starting during the Regan years. Notice it's the IRS web site. Scroll down to Tax Return Filers with Salaries and Wages from Forms W-2 Its an excel sheet.

    It's your own fault that you are not part of that select class of new millionaires, just like it's my fault that I am not either. But unlike you asshole, I am not jealous. Want to know why the numbers didn't go down during the Clinton years? Unlike you asshole, he recognized something that worked.

  21. Re:Immature and Gun Happy on Hunters Shot Down Google Fiber · · Score: 1
    But most non Americans are fucking bigots and racists when it comes to middle east cultures. Should I look up all the anti Semitic web sites, news stories from other parts of the world to prove my point? Or rather, should I point out all the other nations of the world that are infringing on the rights of Muslim women and how they dress by passing national laws against what they wear?

    And I'm spouse to give a shit what a bunch of racist cock suckers think. Yup, what ever

  22. Re:Why would they do this? on T-Mobile Facing Lawsuit Over Text Message Censorship · · Score: 1
    Fair question. I should have worded my question differently. I should have stated.
    Do you find it acceptable for these types of censorship?

    In a lower post, where I actually asked the question of the correct individual. They responded. The crutz of their answer was yes, it is acceptable. They are able to view the contents of the spam bucket and they are the installer of the anti virus.

  23. Re:Who I origionally tried to reply to on T-Mobile Facing Lawsuit Over Text Message Censorship · · Score: 1

    Ok, so as long as you have a choice to accept or deny. It is not censorship. Works for me, thanks.

  24. Who I origionally tried to reply to on T-Mobile Facing Lawsuit Over Text Message Censorship · · Score: 0, Troll
    So are you saying any form of spam filtering is censorship?

    Do you consider all spam filtering companies as censoring companies? Do you consider anti virus software as censorship software?

    All of the examples I have given will restrict what you see. By your definition, that is censorship. Correct or no?

    If you answer yes to all of these being censorship. Are you stating they should be illegal?

  25. Re:Why would they do this? on T-Mobile Facing Lawsuit Over Text Message Censorship · · Score: 0, Troll
    So are you saying any form of spam filtering is censorship?

    Do you consider all spam filtering companies as censoring companies? Do you consider anti virus software as censorship software?

    All of the examples I have given will restrict what you see. By your definition, that is censorship. Correct or no?

    If you answer yes to all of these being censorship. Are you stating they should be illegal?