Slashdot Mirror


User: ironjaw33

ironjaw33's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
259
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 259

  1. What about the post office? UPS and FedEx never complain about that, yet the Post Office has a mailbox at every business and home and services each 6 days per week. I remember someone writing an op-ed piece about how the Post Office should get into the ISP business. I don't see how delivery of bits differs that much from delivery of snail mail in terms of the US Constitution.

  2. Re:So if you post on any forum you need to pay $30 on Philly Requiring Bloggers To Pay $300 · · Score: 3, Funny

    TFA is a bit confusing on this point -- it mentions something about income on a tax return, but that's about it. I'm deducing that if you bring in any ad revenue from a blog and you report it in your tax return, you're obligated to purchase the $300 business licence. Since US income taxes are limited to state and federal, I'm not sure how a municipality would enforce this. Also, I keep an informal blog that isn't ad supported -- it costs me money to run. If I were a Philly resident, would I be expected to get a business licence for that?

  3. Re:A mild defense of Kurzweil on Ray Kurzweil Does Not Understand the Brain · · Score: 1

    it may not be possible for a mind to understand a mind of equal complexity, i.e., humans may lack the necessary intelligence to duplicate their own intelligence

    We have self hosting programming languages.

  4. This "illness" must be spreading quickly... on 'Wi-Fi Illness' Spreads To Ontario Public Schools · · Score: 1
    Just this week, someone wrote in to the editorial section of my town newspaper complaining about WiFi affecting his health:

    “I find it regrettable that we are seeing a proliferation of Wi-Fi networks in public and private buildings. As one of a small but growing number of people for whom such networks represent a health hazard, I nevertheless recognize this is inevitable. However, I do vehemently object to their installation in exterior environments. I recently noticed a sign in a flower bed at a local shopping area identifying it as Wi-Fi hot spot. Can’t the city and counties prohibit the extension of these networks into outdoor spaces?

    I just wonder just what sort of "health hazard" this guy has and who is spreading such disinformation. Plenty of other electrical devices, such as a household microwave, emit just as much EM radiation in the 2.4 GHz range as an 802.11 AP. In fact, spending a year within the interference range of an 802.11 AP exposes you to as much radio energy as having a cell phone conversation that lasts only a few minutes.

  5. Another fine example... on Colleges Risk Losing Federal Funding If They Don't Fight Piracy · · Score: 1

    Another fine example of federalism (i.e. extortion) at work...

  6. Re:free internet connectivity is a hotel filter on HotelChatter's Annual Hotel Wi-Fi Report 2010 · · Score: 2

    I don't much care about wifi. I bring an airport express with me... But I refuse to pay for internet connectivity in any hotel. period. I once stayed at the BirgerJarl in Stockholm and was checking my IP address and lo-behold, I was handed an IPv6 address! Next time I went through the lobby, I mentioned how impressed I was to a lady at the counter and she replied that if I liked, she could give me an IPv4 address instead and to just let her know ...

    It's a small world: I stayed at the same hotel a week and a half ago (and was stuck there due to the volcanic ash cloud). When I checked in, I asked about charges for wifi and the concierge stifled a laugh.

  7. What are... on Bluetooth 4.0 Devices To Make the Scene Later This Year · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bluetooth cats?

  8. Re:Finally, someone gets it. on Lord Lucas Says Record Companies "Blackmail" Users · · Score: 1

    Members of nobility elected for life? Sounds a lot like the U.S. Senate...

  9. Re:How would that work on Police Arrest Man For Refusing To Tweet · · Score: 1

    So it was the same group of idiots? That explains a lot, actually.

    The police or the crowd?