Other popular countermeasures (or ordinary calming techniques) like deep cleansing breaths, etc. are also going to result in the examiner flunking you.
So someone who is uncomfortable with the process is going to fail every time.
This sort of "presumed guilt" bullshit has a long history of prejudicial application via the implicit biases of the glorified chimps doing the evaluation
It's the Salem witch trials all over again, with a different kind of "witchcraft"
which would make one believe he had a reason for attempting to evade it.
Did you see the word "alleged" up there? You can say anything you want in a press release. For reference read the copious police reports of "resisting arrest" that end up as bullshit. Nobody but the parties involved has any clue about what actually happened.
He found vulnerabilities in our intelligence-gathering.
How many other people have tricked the FBI? There is no way to tell. With his data they can try to figure out if other polygraph interviews have been "tainted" by a skillful victim.
So even if someone uses an Xcode that is compromised, there's not very much gain you are going to get by having malicious code in the app except for what that app is working with.
how about adding an extra hidden recipient to all your emails? there's no way any security system is going to stop that.
how about a bank app that transfers money to the malware author instead of the intended recipient? again how do you stop that with security?
The problem is that having shit available for others on the internet costs money. Your options are a pay-wall or ads.
NO, there are other alternatives
you can sell stuff from your web site you can host your own ads that won't be blocked if you have a brick and mortar presence then the website will direct customers to your store you can do it out of the kindness of your heart (if you have the money) you can ask for donations from your dedicated fans
I'm sure there are many more ways to have a web site pay for itself.
why would you assume this? USA has the most stringent diesel emissions requirements on the planet, these cars are probably perfectly legal in other parts of the world.
According to the previous article about this, the cars are still LEGAL, they are just nowhere near as clean as they claim. It's not a "clean" or "dirty" question, all cars are dirty to a certain extent.
they are only legal because the alternative would be chaos
Slashdot Mirror
Other popular countermeasures (or ordinary calming techniques) like deep cleansing breaths, etc. are also going to result in the examiner flunking you.
So someone who is uncomfortable with the process is going to fail every time.
you work for a fascist enterprise that's focused on prosecuting political crimes.
I like living in a country where political crimes are prosecuted. Why don't you?
This sort of "presumed guilt" bullshit has a long history of prejudicial application via the implicit biases of the glorified chimps doing the evaluation
It's the Salem witch trials all over again, with a different kind of "witchcraft"
Since most people don't have access to a polygraph, this means that polygraphs actually work pretty well most of the time, on most people.
How exactly do you sort out the people who have trained from those who have not? Do you hook them up to a polygraph to get the answer?
if someone is nervous that their lies are going to be detected they will potentially show other visible signs in behavior or answering of questions
or it could be a nervous system disorder
or they could be freaking out because their 14 year old daughter has discovered sex
or any one of a hundred other things that make people worry or get nervous
which would make one believe he had a reason for attempting to evade it.
Did you see the word "alleged" up there? You can say anything you want in a press release. For reference read the copious police reports of "resisting arrest" that end up as bullshit. Nobody but the parties involved has any clue about what actually happened.
Even if that "someone" is a veteran FBI agent? Don't think so.
I said "could" for a reason, instead of "will"
hooking someone up to a machine with wires is a good way to scare the crap out of them, the "polygraph" machine could be an empty box.
He found vulnerabilities in our intelligence-gathering.
How many other people have tricked the FBI? There is no way to tell. With his data they can try to figure out if other polygraph interviews have been "tainted" by a skillful victim.
How easy is that to do for someone other than the developer of the mail app?
what if the developer IS developing a mail app?
because as a developer builds an app, they are often monitoring network traffic or otherwise examining app activity
if (strcmp(username, "suckerDeveloper")) {
do_nasty_stuff();
}
the app won't do anything differently when it's running on the developer's computer
So even if someone uses an Xcode that is compromised, there's not very much gain you are going to get by having malicious code in the app except for what that app is working with.
how about adding an extra hidden recipient to all your emails? there's no way any security system is going to stop that.
how about a bank app that transfers money to the malware author instead of the intended recipient? again how do you stop that with security?
but penalizing sites that use them responsibly is horrible.
A perfectly competent and well-run web site can still be hosting malware from third-party web sites.
The problem is that having shit available for others on the internet costs money. Your options are a pay-wall or ads.
NO, there are other alternatives
you can sell stuff from your web site
you can host your own ads that won't be blocked
if you have a brick and mortar presence then the website will direct customers to your store
you can do it out of the kindness of your heart (if you have the money)
you can ask for donations from your dedicated fans
I'm sure there are many more ways to have a web site pay for itself.
Nobody's forcing you to click on clickbait ads. Read the text, don't blindly click on pictures.
You do have to download them. If you're browsing from a phone, you are paying for the ads even if you ignore them.
Web publishers should get together to make a "Reader's Charter" that pledges to stop clickbait and intrusive ads.
and remove their #1 source of income? those are the ads that pay the best. why oh why would they do that?
Any ad that make a site to perform badly or change the page layout in an unsual way should be ban in first place by the website owner.
You do realize that the ads are coming from a third party and the webmaster really doesn't have a lot of control over this.
Adblocking would never have become a thing if they had stuck to image only banner ads and such and never introduced 'punch the monkey' type ads.
I think ad-delivered malware probably plays a role too.
I have yet to see a study which shows that this actually produces less pollution
https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/
the original point I was making is that VW has been selling questionable cars for many decades
I would assume that numerous nations
why would you assume this? USA has the most stringent diesel emissions requirements on the planet, these cars are probably perfectly legal in other parts of the world.
http://www.volksworld.com/tech-guides/technical-information/air-cooled-vw-engine-oil-system-31531
"it took 40 years, and the advent of the so-called Type 4 engine, for VW to include a proper oil filter system in its design."
According to the previous article about this, the cars are still LEGAL, they are just nowhere near as clean as they claim. It's not a "clean" or "dirty" question, all cars are dirty to a certain extent.
they are only legal because the alternative would be chaos
If there was a button in the car where they could push "better mileage, worse emissions" I'd bet most of them would have pushed it.
if the button told the truth and said "markedly reduced engine life" would people still be pushing it?
I still owe more than it is worth.
this is why it's profoundly stupid to buy a new car