Nobody is claiming they're superior genes. They offer a different trade-off (greater cancer risk, greater autoimmune disease risk in exchange for a lower risk from a selection of viruses and bacteria).
I know it's supposed to be funny, but I'll bore the socks off people by noting we have only found one hybrid who had a homo sapien father. Every other archaeological specimen we know of has a Neanderthal father.
No, homo sapiens met Denisovans in Indonesia, on the path out of Africa.
This conveyed superior capacity for low temperatures and low oxygen.
Humans only met Neanderthals 55,000-60,000 years ago.
Many hybrids, such as those in the Red Deer Cave, went extinct.
There is no superiority. Stronger immune systems are why Europeans suffer from far more severe autoimmune disorders, conditions barely known in Africa.
It's always a trade-off. We are all specialists, adapted to local needs, as always happens with evolution.
Since the guy has slandered his accuser and openly stated that he will rule against democrats on principle, your statement applies to the accused as much as anyone else.
But I doubt you care as long as you win. Winning matters, not doing what is right, right?
Odd that the hearsay predates this by a couple of years and has been backed by witnesses.
Odd that less evidence has been used by Republicans to harass Democrats. You don't get one-sided rules, if harassing Democrats is fine then you lose the right to complain.
Most people worthy of being judges would be different. Very few are. Open hatred of women and democrats is not acceptable in a judge. Open hatred of anyone is not acceptable in a judge.
But I wouldn't expect those who stand to profit to understand or care.
Slashdot Mirror
Typical science writer error.
He's a biologist. I don't get my astrophysics from biologists any more than I get my biology from astrophysicists.
This has been explained countless times.
Vectors aren't additive that way.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.g...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.g...
https://opentextbc.ca/physicst...
In a nutshell, relative velocity alters space and time. It's the Lorenz Contraction. This throws in the extra term into the equation.
When insults are the only things listened to, expect to listen only to insults.
Sorry, you can't blame science writers for copying a broader trend. Blame the trend, or better still fix it.
The speed of light is a constant, time and space change under the Lorenz contraction in a way that keep light fixed.
(Technically, light only happens to travel at C in a perfect vacuum. C is not otherwise related to light.)
Nobody is claiming they're superior genes. They offer a different trade-off (greater cancer risk, greater autoimmune disease risk in exchange for a lower risk from a selection of viruses and bacteria).
I know it's supposed to be funny, but I'll bore the socks off people by noting we have only found one hybrid who had a homo sapien father. Every other archaeological specimen we know of has a Neanderthal father.
No, homo sapiens met Denisovans in Indonesia, on the path out of Africa.
This conveyed superior capacity for low temperatures and low oxygen.
Humans only met Neanderthals 55,000-60,000 years ago.
Many hybrids, such as those in the Red Deer Cave, went extinct.
There is no superiority. Stronger immune systems are why Europeans suffer from far more severe autoimmune disorders, conditions barely known in Africa.
It's always a trade-off. We are all specialists, adapted to local needs, as always happens with evolution.
Ahhh, no.
Denisovans branched off from Neanderthals, so if they're not on the list, we would be able to date when the mutations arose in Neanderthals.
They're structurally different, have different composition and formed differently at a different time.
So every intrinsic property differs.
I don't need an arbitrary definition, just one by scientists.
The GOP has stable popularity according to Nate Silver's weighted average of polls.
Besides, life isn't about being popular, it's about being right and doing right.
Since the guy has slandered his accuser and openly stated that he will rule against democrats on principle, your statement applies to the accused as much as anyone else.
But I doubt you care as long as you win. Winning matters, not doing what is right, right?
So only you have free speech? Only you get to dispense it to the righteous?
And you call them morons?
Openly supporting a candidate opposed to your business is probably bad.
You don't know much about the left. Or diversity.
Only those you like get free speech? And you seriously wonder why people are angry?
Agreed, the Republicans don't like democracy at all.
The allegations haven't changed in two years. What makes you think they changed before then?
In America, that's legal and commonplace.
No, leftism is about fairness.
Fairness states that if the right get to be abusive, the right don't get to hoard the abuse to themselves.
The left is about equality
The right had no problem trashing left-wingers, the left are simply making things equal.
The right believe in the Bible. The Bible says do unto others what you'd have others do unto you. The left honour your beliefs and oblige.
If you don't like this, treat others decently and others will do likewise to you.
Odd that the hearsay predates this by a couple of years and has been backed by witnesses.
Odd that less evidence has been used by Republicans to harass Democrats. You don't get one-sided rules, if harassing Democrats is fine then you lose the right to complain.
They can and they do. It's common. Sorry you've missed the past hundred years.
No way to speak about Republicans.
Most people worthy of being judges would be different. Very few are. Open hatred of women and democrats is not acceptable in a judge. Open hatred of anyone is not acceptable in a judge.
But I wouldn't expect those who stand to profit to understand or care.