Are you assuming some specific definition of planet? Because it's not going to be one planetary scientists recognize. If it were, you'd not be so sure.
Generally, evangelical Buddhists aren't much of an issue. Evangelical atheists tend not to care. Evangelical heathens will sacrifice a chicken to Woden before reading the entrails and declaring they don't give a damn.
Those kids waiting... And waiting... And waiting... And ending up serially abused when they're 18, penniless and vulnerable suggests your list of adopters may be very short or seriously unethical.
The worst I face is purgatory for a thousand years, according to the Bible, although early Christian texts on which Matthew was based say Hell no longer exists.
If God does exist, it will be the Christian right who will be asked to explain themselves.
I'm not prejudiced to new theories, I would have been one of those 50 years ahead of you prior to relativity, after all, and I'm still that far ahead now.
I just don't pick up the first theory I encounter. What you pick up could leave you with a rash.
I've made it clear QI is interesting and should be tested, not shunned or treated like a religion.
I've also made it clear dark matter and MOND have problems, that I'm not ok with theories only valid with a rail card, but that experiments should decide and experiments alone. Prediction and falsification are acceptable, correlation after the fact is bad science.
I'm referring to specific predictions made by string theorists in 1986 at the 300 Years of Gravity symposium, specific predictions regarding supersymmetry, specific predictions regarding leptons and specific predictions regarding supergravity.
Why should I care about string excitation when the falsification of any of the above would falsify string theory?
You're also looking at magnets at the time of the SSC. Those at the LHC are superior. Upgrade your numbers to where the supercollider would be now not then.
String theory requires certain testable things to be true, so if any are false then string theory is false.
String theory makes some direct predictions regarding the nature of leptons and the effects around strings. These are also testable. If false, string theory is false.
These are matters of fact. Opinions, even by scientists, are just opinions.
Slashdot Mirror
Probably a capture. But it's the density of the host planet - ten times Jupiter's - that is really interesting and being largely ignored.
Why?
Are you assuming some specific definition of planet? Because it's not going to be one planetary scientists recognize. If it were, you'd not be so sure.
Well, I'm sure some fans of Freddy would be asking that.
It's true or it's false. Neither option is liberal.
It was Virginia law until early this year.
If a child was raped but forced to marry the perp, it wasn't rape under Virginia law.
Many ways to make vaccines.
The oldest was blood taken from people with related diseases.
Current methods use animals with similar immune systems, or deactivated pathogens.
Nobody has died from the vaccine.
Thousands have died from anti-vaxxer propaganda.
I want those responsible in court. Since they knew the effect and knew there was no risk from vaccines, second degree murder seems appropriate.
The data shows otherwise.
Ultimately, if you stay otherwise healthy, you will die from either cancer or exhaustion of stem cells.
The latter occurs at age 120.
So eliminating cancer raises the average life expectancy to 100.
They're generally right-wing Christian, the anti-vaxxers.
Any Buddhist who objects isn't much of a Buddhist. They're certainly not Enlightened.
I tend not to worry about fictional people.
Except for The Doctor and Gandalf. Both of whom would be in favour.
Generally, evangelical Buddhists aren't much of an issue. Evangelical atheists tend not to care. Evangelical heathens will sacrifice a chicken to Woden before reading the entrails and declaring they don't give a damn.
Doesn't leave a whole lot of others.
If they did, they'd have adopted kids already.
Those kids waiting... And waiting... And waiting... And ending up serially abused when they're 18, penniless and vulnerable suggests your list of adopters may be very short or seriously unethical.
I can guarantee you'll die young and stupid. It is also not socialism. But one out of three ain't bad.
Doubt it happens much, if at all.
Hyperactive autoimmune disorders do, and they're mostly caused by ultra-sterile conditions, unhealthy foods and unhealthy environments.
Fix those and vaccine "safety" will reach new levels.
As long as that involves a direct order banning illegal bulk collection of data and weakening of any encryption.
Yip. Total fabrication. And scientists have studied this, too.
You can make up your own mind, but you don't get to make up your own facts.
There's no evidence of dire side effects from vaccines, hyperactive immune systems can cause problems
HPV does cause cancer, that's the latest from science.
We might disagree on theology, but I respect your philosophy and your right to believe. I wish more were as tolerant as you.
Why should I fear the possible existence of God?
The worst I face is purgatory for a thousand years, according to the Bible, although early Christian texts on which Matthew was based say Hell no longer exists.
If God does exist, it will be the Christian right who will be asked to explain themselves.
Vaccines aren't about your body, they're about everybody.
And in most of the US, abortion is becoming de facto illegal, so your complaint isn't valid anyway.
He does benefit. HPV can kill men, and men can spread the virus to women (I assume a living significant other is still regarded as a benefit).
The only way the next gen could be less prejudiced would be if they treated science as a religion of the week. Would that be useful to anyone?
I'm not prejudiced to new theories, I would have been one of those 50 years ahead of you prior to relativity, after all, and I'm still that far ahead now.
I just don't pick up the first theory I encounter. What you pick up could leave you with a rash.
I've made it clear QI is interesting and should be tested, not shunned or treated like a religion.
I've also made it clear dark matter and MOND have problems, that I'm not ok with theories only valid with a rail card, but that experiments should decide and experiments alone. Prediction and falsification are acceptable, correlation after the fact is bad science.
I'm referring to specific predictions made by string theorists in 1986 at the 300 Years of Gravity symposium, specific predictions regarding supersymmetry, specific predictions regarding leptons and specific predictions regarding supergravity.
Why should I care about string excitation when the falsification of any of the above would falsify string theory?
You're also looking at magnets at the time of the SSC. Those at the LHC are superior. Upgrade your numbers to where the supercollider would be now not then.
Opinions are not evidence.
String theory requires certain testable things to be true, so if any are false then string theory is false.
String theory makes some direct predictions regarding the nature of leptons and the effects around strings. These are also testable. If false, string theory is false.
These are matters of fact. Opinions, even by scientists, are just opinions.