No problem. Unless you want to sell anything over here in Europe because simply saying "selling this as-is, no warranty, if you break it, you get to keep both parts and that's that" works for software, but nothing else.
This is why our law over here recognizes two distinct cases with these stickers: Parts and assembly (more to the point: warranty and guarantees).
The warranty of parts cannot be voided by removing the stickers (unless you start removing stickers from the parts themselves), but the warranty on the assembly can be voided. Or at least it would be on your to prove now what the CPU cooler was mounted the wrong way after you cooked off your i7. With intact stickers, there is no way the shop can weasel out of paying for it because obviously THEY made an assembly error. With the stickers gone, you have a hard time proving that it wasn't you trying to "improve" something in the way they put it together, botching it and toasting your CPU.
No, because the law recognizes that if you do not have the proper skill or equipment to repair a device and break it in the process of an attempted repair due to faulty equipment (like, say, using a non-clean room), you're allowed to keep both pieces but that's it.
And living in a sensible country I can as well, knowing that pretty much all in the EULA is null and void due to being a contract only presented after the deal has been sealed, which is illegal.
Well, then it's case closed. I mean, when have you ever felt that you actually own a console (or hell, a game) you bought? DRM is at the point where you should be lucky that it at least plays... at least for the time the maker allows it to, that is.
The difference is maybe that the data breech in those other cases was a damage to the ones losing the data, too, while Facebook's very business model is based on doing just what happened.
Say, how exactly do you connect to the internet? Could it be that your modem connects using a username and password? You might not have seen it, ever, but that doesn't mean it ain't there. And can be abused for nefarious activities that will finally be pegged to you, the rightful user of that account.
Or are you afraid of going deaf because of the volume of the "OH HELL NO!" that will be yelled at you?
Are you nuts? Seriously, I'm asking. Are you nuts? Who is idiot enough to, after the past YEARS of identity theft and privacy abuse, even suggest something like this? And how much faith in the idiocy of humanity does it take to expect people to actually WANT this?
I'm not even going for the obvious "identification != authentication". It's been shown time and again that it's trivially easy to bypass biometric scans, at least user-grade devices that do it. And you want me to trust my banking to something like this?
Slashdot Mirror
Just to think, we get hate speech eliminating AI and cold fusion in the same year!
I can print any TOS on one A4 page.
Provided I have a good enough printer with enough resolution, that is...
No problem. Unless you want to sell anything over here in Europe because simply saying "selling this as-is, no warranty, if you break it, you get to keep both parts and that's that" works for software, but nothing else.
Oh please, their own hardware is so easily fooled that anything you could replace it with can only be an improvement in security.
This is why our law over here recognizes two distinct cases with these stickers: Parts and assembly (more to the point: warranty and guarantees).
The warranty of parts cannot be voided by removing the stickers (unless you start removing stickers from the parts themselves), but the warranty on the assembly can be voided. Or at least it would be on your to prove now what the CPU cooler was mounted the wrong way after you cooked off your i7. With intact stickers, there is no way the shop can weasel out of paying for it because obviously THEY made an assembly error. With the stickers gone, you have a hard time proving that it wasn't you trying to "improve" something in the way they put it together, botching it and toasting your CPU.
Yeah, yeah, grenades are a lot like a marriage.
Ring gone - house gone
Not everything. He ain't been in office long enough for that.
But it's curious, a lot of things that he did backfired badly.
No, because the law recognizes that if you do not have the proper skill or equipment to repair a device and break it in the process of an attempted repair due to faulty equipment (like, say, using a non-clean room), you're allowed to keep both pieces but that's it.
And living in a sensible country I can as well, knowing that pretty much all in the EULA is null and void due to being a contract only presented after the deal has been sealed, which is illegal.
So they only tell you in the second semester that laws trump contracts?
Well, then it's case closed. I mean, when have you ever felt that you actually own a console (or hell, a game) you bought? DRM is at the point where you should be lucky that it at least plays... at least for the time the maker allows it to, that is.
If you're giving fake answers you can as well look like a fake.
You left out "or have friends that use facebook".
The difference is maybe that the data breech in those other cases was a damage to the ones losing the data, too, while Facebook's very business model is based on doing just what happened.
It is.
Out of curiosity, do you pronounce your first name h'cs or hc's?
Are you sure?
Zuck is beyond getting the benefit of doubt. If it looks like he's weaseling out of a question, he's weaseling out of a question.
...if your provider lets you control it. More and more you're forced to use your provider's modem and they, not you, decide whether your WiFi is on.
As long as we let idiots run our companies and even the world, how could you resist?
And 5, it's not loud enough.
Well, you should be good for 9 changes. The tenth could be a bit hard unless you're from Alabama.
Say, how exactly do you connect to the internet? Could it be that your modem connects using a username and password? You might not have seen it, ever, but that doesn't mean it ain't there. And can be abused for nefarious activities that will finally be pegged to you, the rightful user of that account.
Or are you afraid of going deaf because of the volume of the "OH HELL NO!" that will be yelled at you?
Are you nuts? Seriously, I'm asking. Are you nuts? Who is idiot enough to, after the past YEARS of identity theft and privacy abuse, even suggest something like this? And how much faith in the idiocy of humanity does it take to expect people to actually WANT this?
I'm not even going for the obvious "identification != authentication". It's been shown time and again that it's trivially easy to bypass biometric scans, at least user-grade devices that do it. And you want me to trust my banking to something like this?
I have to ask again: Are you stupid?
Or do you just think I am?
So because roads may be used by everyone I have to let everyone use my parking lot, too, and can't limit its use to my customers?
Dammit, I neglected something that could be nitpicked about.
Do you really care how much the "power plant" of your home weighs? I mean, beyond the capabilities of the foundation you put it on, of course.