Good news to me, too, I don't live in the US and when they try it with us we can point and say "Look what it did to the country that pretty much invented the internet!"
You do not trust Microsoft? What OS do you use? You do not trust Google? What search engine do you use?
"Trust", in the way it is used in security, means that you have a certain expectation towards a certain resource and you are willing to believe it to perform a specific service with specific license provided by you. In a less abstract way, you use Google as a search engine and you trust it to provide you with reasonably matching results to the search terms you enter, and you also trust it not to deliberately present you with links that are supposed to hijack your browser, install malware onto your machine and/or trick you into doing so.
The trust the GP is talking about towards Adobe included their willingness to provide him with a PDF reader along with his ability to disable any tacked-on bloatware during the installation. The reason for his trust was prior experience and that it worked that way until now. The breach of his trust is constituted by Adobe not continuing this established procedure.
That's how science works. You observe, you try new theories, and most of them don't stand the test of time. Some, though, do. They get incorporated into our set of knowledge. That's what science is about. Creating a model that will explain what we found, until we create a better model that describes it better.
Basically he comes across as a ADHD child in the terrible twos. I mean, look at him. When his toys didn't behave like he wanted them to, he tried to flush them. What's left was treated with unfairness and cruelty, arbitrary punishment and reward.
It's like handing a child an ant farm and that little asshole poking at the poor creatures, putting them under a magnifying glass and dumping a glass of water onto them, just for the sake of watching them suffer.
You look at this planet and question his incompetence?
But I can already see how it was, any engineer knows. God was building the Earth and he saw it was faulty and not ready for shipping and someone up in management said "We got a schedule to keep, just ship it and we'll patch the rest with some miracles".
And it's not because of Apple, it's a logical development.
Who buys headphones? Well, people who need new ones because the old ones are dead and/or sound like shit. Headphones are not really an item you buy due to fashion changing. Well, most people don't, I know that there are certainly some that have to have headphones that match the color and style of their handbag, but let's go with the sane majority.
So you have the choice between cordless and corded headphones. What will be the decider here is probably price, availability and quality. Cordless is certainly more convenient than corded (anyone who ever had to weave headphone cords through his jacket so they don't get caught in any doorknob will know). Quality should be on par by now, too. So why not buy cordless if they're halfway decently priced?
In that case the estimates are false, but the statistics don't change. With more cases happening it will have to be adjusted from "on average every 30 years" to "on average every 5 years", but it still remains the same chance, independent of whether there was a flood last year.
Slashdot Mirror
Evolution doesn't "cull", and most certainly not based on the whim of a childish prude.
Evolution only happens. It has no agenda.
Neither is democracy a scientific idea, nor does the democratic principle apply to science.
I'm talking about reality.
Show me one, ONE SINGLE politician in the US that doesn't somehow invoke his god in every other speech. Or in every speech when it's election time.
Very obviously you can do that. Well, maybe you cannot, but those two could.
Good news to me, too, I don't live in the US and when they try it with us we can point and say "Look what it did to the country that pretty much invented the internet!"
Remember kids, getting fucked is fun!
Who let the priest in?
We need a separation of business and state.
But seeing how well that separation of church and state worked, I'd rather not hold my breath.
Genesis 1:27: So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
Coincidence? You decide!
You do not trust Microsoft? What OS do you use? You do not trust Google? What search engine do you use?
"Trust", in the way it is used in security, means that you have a certain expectation towards a certain resource and you are willing to believe it to perform a specific service with specific license provided by you. In a less abstract way, you use Google as a search engine and you trust it to provide you with reasonably matching results to the search terms you enter, and you also trust it not to deliberately present you with links that are supposed to hijack your browser, install malware onto your machine and/or trick you into doing so.
The trust the GP is talking about towards Adobe included their willingness to provide him with a PDF reader along with his ability to disable any tacked-on bloatware during the installation. The reason for his trust was prior experience and that it worked that way until now. The breach of his trust is constituted by Adobe not continuing this established procedure.
They should pop one up asking whether you want to install it.
You kidding? That's one hell of an uptime! Don't you dare thinking about replacing it!
The one measuring stuff. The other one doesn't even guess, he merely believes someone who guessed a long time ago.
You sure he gets paid for that?
Please let Rule 34 not apply this time, please let Rule 34 not apply this time...
That's how science works. You observe, you try new theories, and most of them don't stand the test of time. Some, though, do. They get incorporated into our set of knowledge. That's what science is about. Creating a model that will explain what we found, until we create a better model that describes it better.
Actually, we've moved from glancing impact to head on kaboom.
Do Islamic colleges taste like hummus?
I'm asking for a friend.
Basically he comes across as a ADHD child in the terrible twos. I mean, look at him. When his toys didn't behave like he wanted them to, he tried to flush them. What's left was treated with unfairness and cruelty, arbitrary punishment and reward.
It's like handing a child an ant farm and that little asshole poking at the poor creatures, putting them under a magnifying glass and dumping a glass of water onto them, just for the sake of watching them suffer.
Asshole.
You look at this planet and question his incompetence?
But I can already see how it was, any engineer knows. God was building the Earth and he saw it was faulty and not ready for shipping and someone up in management said "We got a schedule to keep, just ship it and we'll patch the rest with some miracles".
And it's not because of Apple, it's a logical development.
Who buys headphones? Well, people who need new ones because the old ones are dead and/or sound like shit. Headphones are not really an item you buy due to fashion changing. Well, most people don't, I know that there are certainly some that have to have headphones that match the color and style of their handbag, but let's go with the sane majority.
So you have the choice between cordless and corded headphones. What will be the decider here is probably price, availability and quality. Cordless is certainly more convenient than corded (anyone who ever had to weave headphone cords through his jacket so they don't get caught in any doorknob will know). Quality should be on par by now, too. So why not buy cordless if they're halfway decently priced?
26% of how much? Selling 4 instead of 3 per year is even a 33% increase.
Be it as it may, outside the sheltered walled garden of Apple the 3.5 jack is anything but outdated.
In that case the estimates are false, but the statistics don't change. With more cases happening it will have to be adjusted from "on average every 30 years" to "on average every 5 years", but it still remains the same chance, independent of whether there was a flood last year.
Should've written "generally" instead of "essentially", agreed.
Is that the same Slashdot where Global Warming is a perpetual myth? Just checking.