Send that first one, "HEY magnetophone (5:10)", to Nintendo.
That was the best and only midi track that I had time to hear. I thought it excellent; not in likeness of a DDR or aerobics or Techno theme, but one that need earn attachment to a strange title. May I be pardoned that I compare to a past-played entertainment title; I thought it blended the ambience of a Science Fiction and Action title; those open-source media developers would eat that up. I've a software MIDI -- regardless, that didn't compare with the crud that squeeks through on the typical eMail and websites I've stumbled across. Thankyou!
Whenever I think of MIDI music, I immediatly think of a horrible(redundant?) MIDI system used as a car alarm with Divo dancing around it. I don't think I'm "old", yet. This is an accurate portrayal of what I think of MIDI music.
Look into history, on the one side that aacknowledged the presenc of God as "unknowable" and "unconcious." As far as I know, anyone that makes ANY kind of determination or distinction of history is making one based on Intelligence. Please don't confuse THAT intelligent design cult with our fellow Intelligent scientists.
And did you not study your adversary? His Bible, record to the words of Jesus and King David, says the people are gods. This isn't difficult to comprehend: you are a god if you are living: you are a god if you can make a judgment on facts and lies that move towards you! Prayer is just this: put a matter in the hands of the almighty, above all others, an appeal to Him that is not in the world while in the world. The Pharisees, holding the Talmud -- even THEY acknowledge God, with exception that God is unknowable and unconcious. Can you see a baby throwing a tantrum? That day-old bottle of spoiled milk is the work of a whiny-god, and in that bottle of spoiled milk was created life as the result of a tantrum. Search your mind.
This isn't a difficult parable! I found no fault in the Scientists, but when they devolve just as that little baby and argue what does or doesn't exist: unicorns, Landover Baptist, sound, leprachauns! It is all evidence or SHARED PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDER (Folie a Deux). Let me remind you, BOTH FEUDING PARTIES ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE HONEST PEOPLE THAT PARTAKE ON THESE PRINCIPLES. Evidence, or Disorder.
If we both capitulate all this introductive assonance to the altar of CowboyNeal, then a sword of fire will come forth from his mouth and slew all those fools in charge of moderating these aweful posts.
Christians and Science Theory is compatible, not the True Christians(TM) of Landover Baptist. What more is there to know: study, no false witness, love thy neighbor, do not kill, do not steal? Scientists have kept the law, inadvertently; they are at the grace of God (Good), but the grace of the wicked people are what is the stumbling block. The content in this post, below, is your justification to annul claims of people bearing witness of themselves that they are "Christian" or at the grace of God or prohibiting the truth, and therefore here is the Truth to admonish them:
2 Timothy 2:15; [15]Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
1 Thessalonians 4:11; [11]And that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you;
Ecclesiastes 12:12; [12]And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.
Mark 12:25-34; [28]And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all? [29]And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: [30]And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. [31]And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. [32]And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: [33]And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices. [34]And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.
Matthew 5:18-20; [18]For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. [19]Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. [20]For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Psalm 112:1; [1]Praise ye the LORD. Blessed is the man that feareth the LORD, that delighteth greatly in his commandments.
Exodus 20:15-16; [15]Thou shalt not steal. [16]Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
They swear not on a Bible, I've said many times: testimony that is not sworn as true and complete and correct and not mis-leading and in unlimited commercial liability, in affidavit form and witnessed by a notary; is of no value.
With all the computer graphics improving at such a phenomenal appearance to natural environmental conditions, it would possible now to fake any artifact or extra-terrestrial event or passage of time and money for purposes of fraud. The falsified UFO picture are an example, so there is no ill will that the same scrutiny is applied to the moon-landing photographs. It was a long time ago, and because all the astronaughts never did swear to the public AND private long ago, they would doubtless recall the events with same precission as an earlier "story" or at the actual site of the occasion. There was this one man, alleged by the News corporations abroad to be a "conspiracy theorist", despite having a persona remeniscent of selling air (and News Air, btw). He arranged a somwhat biased botch with some fictional childrens' entertainment and unknowing to Buzz Aldrin. He, Bart Sibrel, asked Buzz Aldrin to swear on a Bible that they walked on the moon. Now before anyone accuses me of not letting this matter rest, it is only good that I bring it up so people can learn from these previous attempts of people to mis-lead or accuse or incompletly recuse eachother. Anyways, the conclusion to Bart Sibrel's question was Aldrin punching him in the face. That's not a verry honorable outcome, but expected of one's character being prematuraly slandered despite the same character enjoining to improved prejudice as a celebrated hero. Bart Sibrel immediatly asked his cameraman "did you get that[?]", and they moved in opposing directions.
What if the processing done in the keyboard could be used for entropy, or to provide input for applications and physics engines? I distrinctly remember the IBM Cell processor having a physics engine or two in there, but it wasn't attached to anything sophisticated as the available 102 or 104 instruction-set they my processor posesses. And I bet they RIAA and MPAA would go after the next person for so as much as using their keyboard to pirate music. Hmmm. I better go patent that before Sinclair starts making keyboards again.
And I ran. I ran so far away. You've been hit by a smooth criminal. Hitchin' up the buggy; Churning lots of butter; Raise the barn on Monday; Soon I'll raise another.
You don't need to look far. Here is a resource of a particular Affidavit, for the North-Carolina American Republic, that shows the difference between the three United States and America. Enjoyable, that all the easy work has been done today; comes Now that hard work.
Legal determinations need to cite the relevant code, and to not confuse code as law; code is encryption, for foreign principles and agents to be compliant with the law.
There is a movement in this country. At first, I considered it fringe, but I have found substantial truths in the claims of the fringe group. The group is the "tax patriot" or "tax protestor" group. It depends on which side of the fence you are on.
Arm-chair "patriots" are the fringe group that you speak-of; they don't study, don't know how to talk relative to the dispute at hand, don't use affidavits, and are not polite. In the Internal Revenue Code sworn to and from the agents of that INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, it is dubious as to the intent of the words "unlawful tax protester" that are privileged to an agent to distinguish and re-classify any (even non-subjective) person. It is not made clear wether a person is distinguished as an unlawful-tax protester or an unlawful tax-protester. Without even a jot of a pen, a person can be declared as such; packaged and sent to a grey hotel with bars on the windows and pay the exorbient rent even when not given a key and compelled to sit.
Anyway one of the key "features" of the income tax is that it is only enforceable against those that have a TIN (taxpayer id. number - for foreigners in the US) or SSN (non-foriegners). So the question is then "who needs a SSN?". Well if you are a born in a state of the United States, you most certainly do NOT. This is demonstrated by you having to APPLY for a SSN. Once that is the case then the IRS can track you. Without an SSN, you can't fill out their documents, and they cannot identify you. (Mind you, this does not stop them from collecting levies and leins on accounts that do not have a SSN associated).
Here is UNITED STATES CODE; TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER II > 408
408. Penalties
Release date: 2003-07-24
(a) In general Whoever-- (6) willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity of any other person) furnishes or causes to be furnished false information to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information required by the Commissioner of Social Security in connection with the establishment and maintenance of the records provided for in section 405 (c)(2) of this title; or (8) discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social security number of any person in violation of the laws of the United States; shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
There is a distinction in the Internal Revenue Code between a SSN, a TIN, and an individual TIN (iTIN). The distinction is first seen in CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, TITLE 26, SECTION 301.6019-1
Identifying numbers.
(a) In general--(1) Taxpayer identifying numbers--(i) Principal types. There are several types of taxpayer identifying numbers that include the following: social security numbers, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) individual taxpayer identification numbers, IRS adoption taxpayer identification numbers, and employer identification numbers. Social security numbers take the form 000-00-0000. IRS individual taxpayer identification numbers and IRS adoption taxpayer identification numbers also take the form 000-00-0000 but include a specific number or numbers designated by the IRS. Employer identification numbers take the form 00- 0000000."
That Internale Revenue Code distinguises and admits a SSN is the same form as a TIN and a individual TIN (hereinafter distinguished as ITIN). I have a quote from the Commissioner of Social Security, which I hope you have good faith exists, that I don't have time to search further in my records; Commissioner is approximately quoted that any a
Don't let someone bring mail matter and abandon it in a box. A post office, regulated by the Domestic Mail Manual Service Regulations, can hold general delivery mail default for 30 days (strictly to the code), but when postal patrons and non-customers fall away from enforcing the code then they only hold the general delivery mail for about 10 days (as it is now). Any mail not delivered is stamped RETURN TO SENDER, NOT DELIVERABLE, or NO SUCH PERSON AT THIS or THAT ADDRESS.
General delivery has been used since the end of Lincoln's Civil War; in the "field." Technically, all mail matter dropped off in a box in the "field" is general delivery. Before general delivery, for thousands of years there was held first a general post. Also, look in the Civil Rights Act, as it plainly states that postal patrons do NOT present identification.
signatures (think nature) are congruent to peacable assemblies (Richard and Milhouse), as clerk Richard Milhouse dba RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON (the Richard Nixon is acting in person "clerk")
I made a mistake here and wrote "clerk Richard Nixon", yet it should be changed to read as "clerk Richard Milhouse". You know how these things go... Also I can emphasize a little thing about words of art;
(NIXON is an peacably assembled word of art, first amendment)
Remember to not alienate from the birth-right that the people are endowed by their creator; Richard and Milhouse were created nearer to what people think as God as opposed to NIXON or RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON or another occurence of "Richard Milhouse Nixon" unrelated or forged on papers as to defraud a simple and often quiet peacable man (either male or female) standing on soil or land. I take a more scientific stance on these things, but I try to work them out hand-in-hand that no ill will come to anyone. If it didn't hurt anyone's charisma, just change every appearance of the text "God" or "Almighty God" to "truth" and then that will still not change anyone's animosity towards anyone. Just recognize the living birth-right as opposed to the Freemason-issued Hospitaliar "Certificate of Birth" and you can trump anyone that coerces testimony for a SSN or related redundant enumeration to subject someone to a foreign agent and principle on the other-side of the known seas (world).
We are ChArAcTeR-PREservinG Unix type people. This may trip some people up, what I'm about to say, so let's hurry up with this baptism of knowledge...Unix style.
Zero, alleged "Judge" (realy an executive-ensign Admiralty administrator) Lyne T. Hughes, is quoted;
WORD HINTS: Five Minutes to Clearer Writing 1. Capitalize only proper nouns. Never capitalize whole words. 4. Adopt short, clear labels for the parties.
A. Use part of the name: Acme Consolidated Bank & Trust Co. - Acme.
B. Use its real-world capacity: bank (no quotation marks).
C. Do not use their lawsuit capacity: plaintiff, respondent.
and the rest is history
First, think of the credit/debtor paradigm shift caused by commerce and the use of colorable currency that is attached to House Joint Resolution 192. You, I, do not own or even are capable of possessing a Social Security Number; it, SSN, is property of the Social Security Administration and only the Commissioner of Social Security (government over its creation) can trust whomever may use the SSN.
Second, Richard Nixon doesn't have a social security number enumerated as "567-68-0515", neither does he have a Social Security Number enumerated "567-68-0515". I don't mean to alien you with a reference, and no intention to imply that you are ignorant, but I know that Negotiable Instruments Law and Commercial Code is the government over the use of instruments. Consider that RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON is a debtor and attached to Social Security Number "567-68-0515", thereby Richard Milhouse is the the Holder in Due course of RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON (created by the Social Security Administration).
People don't write in all uppercase; it's a perpresture created to cast a shadow, that false name is artificial and subject to the regulation of Congress and legislatures. Artificial persons are subject to statutes, admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.
That is the truth. And if you want to walk in the truth, then be admonished that all signs and signatures are a matter of commerce and their compelled use is a manner of alienation by plagues of [po]lice powers, and it is good to hold the above form as follows;
peaceable assemblies as (Richard and Milhouse) Richard Milouse, NIXON (NIXON is an peacably assembled word of art, first amendment) signatures (think nature) are congruent to peacable assemblies (Richard and Milhouse), as clerk Richard Milhouse dba RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON (the Richard Nixon is acting in person "clerk") signs as Richard-Milhouse: Nixon (king Nixon)
Trace the etymology of "sign" and it crosses with "king", because when the people hold the seat of government they begin court when they are seated on the king's bench (bench is english form of a latin word "bank"); so beware that you are hold of unlimited liability without Congress's limited liability in HJR 192, to setoff bills (counterfeit if not backed by lawful consideration/value); so make known that when necessity is compelled or an agent of a foreign principality (think Congress, Social Security Administration) coerces agreement or makes a presentment of a contract to someone not of unsound mind (think berthed children from the mothership), be certain to Conditionally Agree while also enscribing "under threat, duress, and coercion" because that is what THAT sy-stem is when in contract of the Judiciary Act separating the original judiciary (people) from that judiciary (We, the People incorporated and of/inferior to the such and such States united).
One problem... nematodes will feast on the Gorilla. Nematodes are the only Worms that thrive in the coldest of desert environments (even GNU HURD); and I mean Antarctica and Arctic continents! Search Nematodes in this Google cache USA TODAY article
We all know what Nematodes did to Bikini Bottom. None would suspect the nematodes... To arms!
Too much scary writing, too many misstatements, and too many numbers that just don't add up.
I know all you have said, and am re-assured.
In no derogatory way of this manner, You should know how statistics come to fruition and collected for compilation and presentment. None of the information presented was refuted by you -- it contained more measurements as percentile. If someone was watching a televesion monitor 24 hours a day and was later diagnosed with all kinds of disorders in their flesh, they would have prepared near same as I posted above, yet there are guinea pigs for the statistics and they were the people sent in Iraq. People just don't get these illnesses walking around in a desert. If it was a biased study, criticizing the known lesser contaniments (DU), with disregard to the possibility of the misplaced unknown that was among the alleged devices accused of that Iraq dictator, then I would expect it to have flaws. They're only pointing at the DU because that's all they can figure, based on rules of evidence. You can't point at the unknown and not laugh; any many should know that when I say "it came...from...the DEEP" then it is a matter unmeasurable and questionable.
I could as easily agree with your abatement as from the "statistics" I appear to have quoted. Among the alleged complications "Dr. Rokke" appears to be suffering from, ALL are internal but skin postules and the fibromyalgia. As anyone having taken Chemotherapy, we would expect "Dr. Rokke" to lose all or most of his hair, yet an photograph at a biased Rally against DU and War and all that unjoy is intended for the confident posing and public-relations that they appear to want. It's almost as though if there was any DU, then that is the cause for mutating their DNA and activate that "protester gene". The quoted statistics were relevant about "Dr. Rokke", but his fellow 30 or so dead fellow assistants are somewhat a side issue of inclusion; I would like to know what that was about -- old age, same exposure, or the DEEP. That's too high a risk for such greatly educted people to die -- they are the bread and butter of USA. And to look at that picture of "Dr. Rokke", I am reminded that his flesh is old. I'm not qualified to make any excuses as to why he thinks all his complications didn't come from a job in Iraq with deplorable working conditions. Does he collect unemployment, or -- that could be irrelevant
He can't breathe well, has fatigue, his joints and muscles hurt, acne-like blemishes on his skin (perhaps every once in a while); he is either going through another dose of puberty or he came in contract with somthing from the DEEEEEP. From that website, the Force (of their agenda/bias) is strong in that one. As far as I know, statistics are from the DEEP if they are not in affidavit form and sworn to be "true, complete, correct, not misleading, and issued in unlimited commercial liability."
You put forth some good points. It's too bad that moderators are too quick to netralize my post with a wasted mod-point and ignore yours. A rebutted post should not be moderated down, but the rebuttals below it should be moderated above it.
A statistic from the among the above cited URL, and this page as follows;
"Depleted uranium (DU) is the highly toxic and radioactive byproduct of the uranium enrichment process... Depleted uranium is roughly 60% as radioactive as naturally occurring uranium, and has a half life of 4.5 billion years. As a result of 50 years of enriching uranium for use in nuclear weapons and reactors, the U.S. has in excess of 1.1 billion pounds of DU waste material." -- Dan Fahey, "Metal of Dishonor" (1997)
"More ordinance was rained down on Iraq during the six weeks of the Gulf War than during the whole of the Second World War. Uknown to the public or the Allied troops at the time, much of it was coated with depleted uranium (DU)" -- Felicity Arbuthnot, New Internationalist, September 1999
"The Pentagon and the United Nations estimate that the U.S. and Britain used 1,100 to 2,200 tons of armor-peircing shells made of depleted uranium during the attacks on Iraq in March and April [2003] -- far more than the 375 tons used in the 1991 Gulf War." -- Seatle Post Intelligencer, 8/4/03
"Since the U.S. military's widespread use of DU in the Gulf became known in 1991, the Pentagon has struggled to suppress mounting evidence that DU munitions are simply too toxic to use. I has cashiered or attempted to discredit its own experts, ignored their advice, impeded scientific research into DU's health effects and assembled a disinformation campaign to confuse the issue." -- Environmental Magazine, May/Jun 2003
"When I spoke out within the military about how bad [depleted uranium] was, my life ended, my career ended, I received threats, warnings, sent to the reserve from full active duty." --
Dr. Douge Rokke, former Army Major, who was in charge of the military's environmental clean-up following the first Gulf War, ABC News, 5/5/03
Thirty members of Rokke's cleanup team have already died, and he has 5,000 times the acceptable level of radiation in his body, resulting in damage to his lungs and kidneys, brain lesions, skin postules, chronic fatigue, continual wheezing and painful fibromyalgia.
After the Gulf War, Rokke was assigned to make a training video to teach soldiers how to handle depleted uranium. I was never shown to the troops.
"...General Calvin Waller told NBC's `Dateline' that neither he nor General Norman Schwartzkopf were ever told about the health hazards of DU." -- Military Toxicx Project's Depleted Uranium Citizens' Network, 1/16/96
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."
-- Henry Kissinger, quoted by Bob Woodward in "The Final Days" (1976)
I have that available too. I thought it provable wrong and a conflict of interests to divest any studies that would not warrant their jurisdiction spread to Catalina Island. About 4 years ago, off the coast of Catalina Island at dusk when preparing for squid, I've seen a dead Bald Eagle. Same area, a year later, I've seen same. About 7 months ago some friends let me know that they were seeing many dead bird washed ashore, no less than four; none shot or with any visual external injuries, but dead. Just as long as the caught creatures are cooked thoroughly, it is healthy to eat is all we know.
DDT is out there. Capital is at stake of every interested party; see the Sedition Act.
Because he thinks money can buy Philanthropy. We hear one man rich from the efforts of the little workmen; why not hear a story of thousands of honestly rich men gifting because it was always among their choices when funds were available and not a last-ditch tax break? Despite the Officers sitting in the Microsoft seat, let's not forget about the little pall-bearers holding the Microsoft casquette under-neath it all. Who works for Microsoft, and who is claiming the ability to gift?
Hhe spreads FDA jurisdiction onto other continents! How would you like to have a foreign jurisdiction and law imposed upon you, that claims that food is a drug because it can prevent disease, or "monitor" health products and unlawfully diverts funds to the scrutiny of products beyond the scope of its charter? Bill Gates isn't even donating, but granting; as a grantor, the trust is revocable. Does anyone remember when FDA tried to re-classify Vitamin C as a "drug" as defined by FDA? It's a power grab to divert constructs of remedy with ministers of cures and drugs. I have a moldy Orange full of Vitamin C and Penecillium; I have some sun-dried Goji berries containing 15 of the 21 or such known proteins that even animal flesh has 5 or 6; remedy. FDA says drug and cure, yet everyone else says remedy.
They advertise their generosity and philactories on every news stand, and overshadow the generosity of common people that do more with what less they can give and don't ward it over eachother. If Bill Gates wanted to actually help people, he'd go drop his donation off somewhere and then walk away; but instead he is getting fiduciary capacity to where the funds may be spent and on what treatments, bringing all the pharmaceutical monopolies beyond the tidemark and plaguing other countries with the beaurocratic nightmare that Americans and citizens of the United States could never keep at bay on thin anti-trust accord.
Over here near southern California, outside on the sea from Westminster at Orange County; I've gone boating all the way to Catalina Island and beyond. There are Bald Eagles nested throughout the island as part of an environmental rehabilitation attempt. Every once in a while, someone finds an Bald Eagle floating face-down in the water. After an invasive test, it has been found that DDT poisoning is the cause, from eating raw fish infected with DDT. Then, DDT has been found all around the shoreline on the open-ocean exposed part of the island. Doing more research, Officers found that DDT was banned because it caused all kinds of health disorders and that mosquitos were becoming more immune after every generation of exposure. In the infinite wisdom of government, they decided to store the DDT in barrels, cast the barrels in cement blocks, and toss them off the southern shore of Catalina Island in what they thought was an adequately deep area.
But with every passint minute... it crumbled apart... it rusted open... and It came from the DEEP! We now have DDT poisoning. Have a nice day.
And please remember, Bald Eagles can cry only for Republican and Democratic patriotism; especially when the propoganda can only show a healthy and crieing Bald Eagle.
It is not possible for you to be anonymous, because I know you. We are of same flesh and bone, we drink the same water, and eat of the same crop. I gave you fat to chew on, and now I give you meat. Wicked men hide in religion behind a good name, but of their religion they are purported as otherwise. Do you actually think a dishonest church would register to the public as a church? What more to send discord among people but behind a good word as Scientific Theory, and not upheld by any scientific theory? You go ahead of yourself fast, as "biology" is the life studied, while Biology is whatever your construe that word to be in title. The bigger question of religion is whomever first applied it -- not knowing, but believing on things they've not seen or not heard.
I'm trying the best I can to uphold scientific theory, as well as those facts proven scientifically. Over here near the States, it is written that those "We the People of the State" are greatfull to Almighty God for their freedom...", and thereby, I want no ill will. I'm not throwing any stones to your way, but living water.
I don't want to say that all law is a matter of religion, yet there it stands -- school is not desired by many children because the teachers don't breath any life into the subjects -- school is coerced. Think of a world where children may choose their study, yet who is to say that they must first learn language before they can proceed to their volunteer study? I say to you, the first stones were thrown by none of us, but teachers -- because a child can't be coerced to contract the services of a teacher. If you will, I will show you, but may you proceed knowing that it is all a matter of religion?
Read it again, brother. You are a preist, dividing the truth. By this method, there is no separation of church and state because you are the prist to [ad]minister the things subject to you. I want this no offense, but it stands by itself. I count you a good neighbor to question the actions of men. Their words are subjected unto you. Everything I say is thought as a confession to a crime, but I spake with not pride, but humility, humble words. I'm not bonded to a voter, but a lector.
Many years ago, brother Thomas (Jefferson) thought to trial the effectiveness of a history without religion; his fruits was the Jefferson Bible. It's quick, and precision lost, because religion is not separable. I don't believe, I know. I hope you see the difference between a man applying religion for intent of malice, as oppposed to a man applying religion for intent of honor and respect; the State can't respect the people because they are competent and particular. If you need setting a forum to copy and move thoughts, let us look no further than Slashdot.
What would you say about a religion that asks the student to study? What of a religion that is a mere pearl that begins the first assembly of a jewel, and is good for further assembly? I don't confuse the truth with Truth. I think it not possible to hinder or allow religion into school, because the text is already assembled and effectuated to religion -- anything added or subtracted is a matter of religion. It only depends on your thoughts on schooling, because before public schools there were schools that people attended without having been coerced. Before compelled Education, as opposed to education, the people entered voluntarily by necessity.
I'm going a way, not away. As I said before, controlled environments give controlled results. I figure that I and You would not want an environment as such. Let the truth come raw, unhindered, without interpretation, and I'll accept and agree with it parens patriae; all men nowithstanding.
It should read that 2005 has risen as the Year of the highest occurence of free-speach since the Alien and Sedition Act applied to Benjamin Franklins' nephew and his printing press.
2006 should be even better, wrestling more first-hand journalism to audiences inexpensively; give or take more bias unethically asserted to the the Left and Right political paradigms instituted by government to split the people (just as George Washington predicted).
[wouldn't have known this without some speech slipping through the cracks].
God bless America (the first nation). God bless the united states of America (the people confederated). God bless the united States of America (the second-class confederacy). God bless the United States (the second nation).
And thank your nearby alien feudal society, citizens of Congress, for keeping their courts-martial out of the Courts by Titles Of Nobility Act.
From Your friendly network redundancy administrator.
I read the encyclopedia entry titled "Wedge strategy" and am not amused; it is political in no derogatory way by the little content it presents, with an enormous touch of bias quashing the couple paragraphs of concept that adhere, therewith by the author is self-evident an application of both those "Intelligent Design" and "Scientific Theory" parties. I was hoping to see more to that strategy, but it was just another application of concern, or defining the movements of one interested posse commitatus over another, equal meritless bias of both parties to the ruin of a perfectly good english word "Wedge", and is ulterior. Let me quote THAT Analysis Of Wedge (...) theory, regardless of the obvious slant on the rest of that WikiPedia article;
The Wedge strategy details a simultaneous assault on state boards of education, state and federal legislatures and on the print and broadcast media. The Discovery Institute is currently carrying out the strategy through its role in the intelligent design movement, where it aggressively promotes ID and its Teach the Controversy campaign to the public, education officials and public policymakers. Intelligent design proponents, through the Discovery Institute, have employed a number of specific political strategies and tactics in their furtherance of their goals. These range from attempts at the state level to undermine or remove altogether the presence of evolutionary theory from the public school classroom, to having the federal government mandate the teaching of intelligent design, to 'stacking' municipal, county and state school boards with ID proponents.
The Discovery Institute has been a significant player in many of these cases, providing a range of support from material assistance to federal, state and regional elected representatives in the drafting of bills to supporting and advising individual parents confronting their school boards. In some state battles, the ties of intelligent design proponents to the Discovery Institute's political and social agenda and its strategy and the Institute's role in the debate have been laid bare to the public and lawmakers, resulting in their efforts being temporarily thwarted. The Discovery Institute takes the sophisticated view that all publicity is good and that no defeat is real. They have relaxed their campaign of promoting ID science curriculum, and in some cases asked it be withdrawn from consideration, in favor of science teachers being required to present evolution as a "theory in crisis"; in other words, teaching the controversy. The strategy is to move, relentlessly, from standards battles, to curriculum writing, to textbook adoption, and back again doing whatever it takes to undermine the central position of evolution in biology.
The same can be said of either party. They are neither devils of eachother, because the claims are without merit and as though intentionally interlapping two unrelated Fields of STUDY; the people they ensnare is intended to strawmen their meritless claims with endless chanting and chicanery with malice. I am certain, having studied the merit in both attempted jurisdiction-spreading claims of the Intelligent Design and Scientific Theory parties is that both are neither scientific and intelligent, given that they are speaking of what they think to know yesterday and barely know today and neither know what is to come. One group holds a book of a possible(theoretical) future titled Revelation, and the other holds a book of a theoretical(possible) future titled R-evolution. It is not scientific to speculate on theory beyond the Now(today), and it is idolatry to move IDeas that are built and confounded by the authority of the Principle and Agent doctrine inherent in the Uni-verse and having no improvement to the life of friends. Therefore, it is true that any disorder caused by these two feuding parties, their both tending collateral not theirs to attorney(tournament); is insurrection and terrorism, non-other but sabota
ID and Scientific Theory are two feuding commercial parties giving the facade of representing actual intelligent people holding scientific theory, and are intended to separate you from good people. If it hurt anyone that I say scientific theory is a blessing from God, then I wont say it but exercise it in my work. Don't let them spread their disease onto you; Folie a Deux. The proponents of the most wicked changes in banking (government) regulations is the hand of Masons; documented as early as Genesis 4:22 (KJVAV1611); "[22]And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron..." When any wealth, be it money or knowledge, changes hands to another tenant (realy), there come the attorneys; Matthew 24:28 (KJVAV1611) "[28]For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.]
As for your thoughts on the Bible, I'll reveal and declare to you; they are not stories of fiction (think Tubalcain, the pleading of the non-masonry Masons/guild); they are history and strategy (logic/technique), enumerated, and acknowledging the cryptic tendencies governments and rules of men have afflicted onto good people (for those Bible thumpers, think about Benjamin and His small tribe). I've studied the Bible cover to cover many times and am finding non-ending and deep truth that supports the cause of those good people not drawn in by the distractions of those two separate feuding nobilities. Study the Bible, you will see some of the foundations of the people that hate you and the witness of the people that want no ill will; Consider how the first and second enumerated bodies (chapters) of the book of Genesis speak of a God on the first six [D]ays of creation and then a LORD God for the eigth [d]ay, thereby the first speaks about the Spirit of God was on the face of the deep, and given that the so-called "waters" were existant before creation occured. Hate it if you will, but this is detailing a Form of creation that intersects with truth and the world. The people that recompiled the scriptures kept as much of the deep in it as the septuaginst had contributed; excellent english skill, that even I struggle with, therefor I reveal to any naught in the know an early comprehensive study in English for an eighth-grade 1895 graduating student at Salinas Kansas.
Continuing...The book of Revelation at the rear of the Bible says that the people are water, and Jesus looked for living water and referred to the jews in the Synagogue of Satan as dirt; sow good seed and it'll leech from both. As meteors fall from the sky, so say many people that Satan is fallen; as wateer from a cloud, so say that which seeks after Satan to saturate and subdue it. Evil people hate and throw rocks, [G]ood people bless and withal water. It gets deeper. Revelation is often thought idolatry by interpretation of the already-existant covenant because it foretells a dream, and much of the Bible has oppressed people enlightened in such a way that is impossible to prove somthing (the future) because the law says to speak nothing of the future but what is Now (today), but they still speak for "concern". It is rebutted that only inspiration from God would allow such thought to be known before its fruition, but that didn't keep people from tresspassing on the original covenant to kill another for tresspassing on the original covenant. All the prophets were thought idolaters Now; if you think calling the people as "water" isn't a hint that the Bible is as though a syllabus or codex to conceal a law or message that had been carried over time, then it naive and woah to you brother! John the baptist had a job working in one of those water purification shops -- purifying water; did he? Jesus said it is Spirit; to me, it is a sacrifice to become a neural surgeon because someone will not get the Certification until one-third of their life is consumed in study. Take your goat "GNU Hippy" to the fro
A theory lasts only a moment, until it's a fact.
on
Warm-blooded Fish?
·
· Score: 0
Facts bear witness of truth, and are not the complete truth themselves.
Depending if the theory is societal, worldly, solar, or universal; all the theory being alleged by both sides is moral! I'm not going to lower the heat on that bunsen burner if bacteria have souls or spirit or not.
They're both a distraction and the ends after the goal is to give the facade that they represent people with the same thoughts, allthewhile convincing idle people to join their mantra. If these two parties had any intention to help the people other than legislate their own worlds of the universe affront to the known world in the universe, then it is to legislate compelled respect and contract stipulations biased to one another. I see none of them are using affidavits, and all the matter in dispute is not theirs to dispute itself because it is not a true and correct and complete and non-misleading sampling. Finger-nail clippings of the corpus.
Somwhere, someone is typing at his keyboard and thinks that God is a figure of speach (sound, transmittal, thoughts) and the LORD God is all That inside the universe -- both inside and outside the world. Diapers and doodoo to me, because that form of science doesn't cure illness and neither does it feed the hungry. At the earliest dispute, the Talmud Jews said God is unconcious -- that's just a religious application to say that the universe and the quality of all it encompasses, is a fine (excessive order) aspect of being.
Fruitless work, proves nothing but how much more an ass one group can sit on the others' head of management and pull someone elses' finger for the pearl of great prize (that's for you mormons).
I must say, you are the most blessed! To compliment your words, I must say that there is so much variance in the world that it is not possible to measure evolution because the rate of change is uneven and progress inconsistent. Evolution can only be proven in a controlled habitat (enter both the ID ass and Scientific Theory ass). That is the struggle between those two shit-faced groups; who can legislate to the governments of men where the controls is to be given authority; And that, friend, is where the line needs to be drawn. They are both religions of Interpretation. Lock them both away and let peaceful studies continue. The only adversarial proceedings occur are as they always have and are yet to continue tomorrow, in the universal dictates unseen to the eyes and yet seen. Both ID and "Scientific Theory" parties claim to study, but by their malicious religion to bore it into our flesh with instruments they actually deny the truth with Truth irrelevant.
[Ecclesiastes 12:12 (KJVAV1611)] "And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh." [1 Thessalonians 4:11 (KJVAV1611)] "And that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you;" [2 Timothy 2:15 (KJVAV1611)] "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."
You will need:
A BLUE PEN
A RED PEN
A sticky-note for each zombie
A fire-proof wall with a nearby open window covered by a good screen and a quick-reload electron gun
Some shells, preferably K or X shells; to packet some heat across the battle-network when you are safe behind the window
Here is how a priest accomplishes the task: get on top to see where the zombies are coming from, designate a list of numbers to identify the zombies, write a number for the zombie on a note with the BLUE PEN, throw the note on a zombie's forehead, run behind the wall behind the open window, get a shell and write using the RED PEN "kill -s TERM " and the given identity number, execute, return the carriage, and repeat for each unique zombie. If you don't hide behind the wall when you execute, then some fragmented bits will splatter on your localhost; causing an infection to spread to you, the parent process; becoming a zombie to the evil BEOWULF CLUSTER of BITTORENT and FREENET users in posession of the Soule Cubicle!
[this warning brought by the DMCA, because in soviet UNITED STATES the zombies are YOU too!]
Slashdot Mirror
Send that first one, "HEY magnetophone (5:10)", to Nintendo.
That was the best and only midi track that I had time to hear. I thought it excellent; not in likeness of a DDR or aerobics or Techno theme, but one that need earn attachment to a strange title. May I be pardoned that I compare to a past-played entertainment title; I thought it blended the ambience of a Science Fiction and Action title; those open-source media developers would eat that up. I've a software MIDI -- regardless, that didn't compare with the crud that squeeks through on the typical eMail and websites I've stumbled across. Thankyou!
Whenever I think of MIDI music, I immediatly think of a horrible(redundant?) MIDI system used as a car alarm with Divo dancing around it. I don't think I'm "old", yet. This is an accurate portrayal of what I think of MIDI music.
Look into history, on the one side that aacknowledged the presenc of God as "unknowable" and "unconcious." As far as I know, anyone that makes ANY kind of determination or distinction of history is making one based on Intelligence. Please don't confuse THAT intelligent design cult with our fellow Intelligent scientists.
And did you not study your adversary? His Bible, record to the words of Jesus and King David, says the people are gods. This isn't difficult to comprehend: you are a god if you are living: you are a god if you can make a judgment on facts and lies that move towards you! Prayer is just this: put a matter in the hands of the almighty, above all others, an appeal to Him that is not in the world while in the world. The Pharisees, holding the Talmud -- even THEY acknowledge God, with exception that God is unknowable and unconcious. Can you see a baby throwing a tantrum? That day-old bottle of spoiled milk is the work of a whiny-god, and in that bottle of spoiled milk was created life as the result of a tantrum. Search your mind.
This isn't a difficult parable! I found no fault in the Scientists, but when they devolve just as that little baby and argue what does or doesn't exist: unicorns, Landover Baptist, sound, leprachauns! It is all evidence or SHARED PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDER (Folie a Deux). Let me remind you, BOTH FEUDING PARTIES ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THOSE HONEST PEOPLE THAT PARTAKE ON THESE PRINCIPLES. Evidence, or Disorder.
If we both capitulate all this introductive assonance to the altar of CowboyNeal, then a sword of fire will come forth from his mouth and slew all those fools in charge of moderating these aweful posts.
Christians and Science Theory is compatible, not the True Christians(TM) of Landover Baptist. What more is there to know: study, no false witness, love thy neighbor, do not kill, do not steal? Scientists have kept the law, inadvertently; they are at the grace of God (Good), but the grace of the wicked people are what is the stumbling block. The content in this post, below, is your justification to annul claims of people bearing witness of themselves that they are "Christian" or at the grace of God or prohibiting the truth, and therefore here is the Truth to admonish them:
2 Timothy 2:15;
[15]Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
1 Thessalonians 4:11;
[11]And that ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we commanded you;
Ecclesiastes 12:12;
[12]And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.
Mark 12:25-34;
[28]And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
[29]And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
[30]And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
[31]And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
[32]And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:
[33]And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
[34]And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.
Matthew 5:18-20;
[18]For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
[19]Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
[20]For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Psalm 112:1;
[1]Praise ye the LORD. Blessed is the man that feareth the LORD, that delighteth greatly in his commandments.
Exodus 20:15-16;
[15]Thou shalt not steal.
[16]Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
They swear not on a Bible, I've said many times: testimony that is not sworn as true and complete and correct and not mis-leading and in unlimited commercial liability, in affidavit form and witnessed by a notary; is of no value.
With all the computer graphics improving at such a phenomenal appearance to natural environmental conditions, it would possible now to fake any artifact or extra-terrestrial event or passage of time and money for purposes of fraud. The falsified UFO picture are an example, so there is no ill will that the same scrutiny is applied to the moon-landing photographs. It was a long time ago, and because all the astronaughts never did swear to the public AND private long ago, they would doubtless recall the events with same precission as an earlier "story" or at the actual site of the occasion. There was this one man, alleged by the News corporations abroad to be a "conspiracy theorist", despite having a persona remeniscent of selling air (and News Air, btw). He arranged a somwhat biased botch with some fictional childrens' entertainment and unknowing to Buzz Aldrin. He, Bart Sibrel, asked Buzz Aldrin to swear on a Bible that they walked on the moon. Now before anyone accuses me of not letting this matter rest, it is only good that I bring it up so people can learn from these previous attempts of people to mis-lead or accuse or incompletly recuse eachother. Anyways, the conclusion to Bart Sibrel's question was Aldrin punching him in the face. That's not a verry honorable outcome, but expected of one's character being prematuraly slandered despite the same character enjoining to improved prejudice as a celebrated hero. Bart Sibrel immediatly asked his cameraman "did you get that[?]", and they moved in opposing directions.
There is a Google cache of another forum conversing the accusations, with a link to the Video of Aldrin punching Sibrel.
What if the processing done in the keyboard could be used for entropy, or to provide input for applications and physics engines? I distrinctly remember the IBM Cell processor having a physics engine or two in there, but it wasn't attached to anything sophisticated as the available 102 or 104 instruction-set they my processor posesses. And I bet they RIAA and MPAA would go after the next person for so as much as using their keyboard to pirate music. Hmmm. I better go patent that before Sinclair starts making keyboards again.
And I ran. I ran so far away.
You've been hit by a smooth criminal.
Hitchin' up the buggy; Churning lots of butter; Raise the barn on Monday; Soon I'll raise another.
You don't need to look far. Here is a resource of a particular Affidavit, for the North-Carolina American Republic, that shows the difference between the three United States and America. Enjoyable, that all the easy work has been done today; comes Now that hard work.
Arm-chair "patriots" are the fringe group that you speak-of; they don't study, don't know how to talk relative to the dispute at hand, don't use affidavits, and are not polite. In the Internal Revenue Code sworn to and from the agents of that INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, it is dubious as to the intent of the words "unlawful tax protester" that are privileged to an agent to distinguish and re-classify any (even non-subjective) person. It is not made clear wether a person is distinguished as an unlawful-tax protester or an unlawful tax-protester. Without even a jot of a pen, a person can be declared as such; packaged and sent to a grey hotel with bars on the windows and pay the exorbient rent even when not given a key and compelled to sit.
Here is UNITED STATES CODE; TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER II > 408
408. Penalties
Release date: 2003-07-24
(a) In general
Whoever--
(6) willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity of any other person) furnishes or causes to be furnished false information to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information required by the Commissioner of Social Security in connection with the establishment and maintenance of the records provided for in section 405 (c)(2) of this title; or
(8) discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social security number of any person in violation of the laws of the United States;
shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
There is a distinction in the Internal Revenue Code between a SSN, a TIN,
and an individual TIN (iTIN). The distinction is first seen in
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, TITLE 26, SECTION 301.6019-1
Identifying numbers.
(a) In general--(1) Taxpayer identifying numbers--(i) Principal
types. There are several types of taxpayer identifying numbers that
include the following: social security numbers, Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) individual taxpayer identification numbers, IRS adoption taxpayer
identification numbers, and employer identification numbers. Social
security numbers take the form 000-00-0000. IRS individual taxpayer
identification numbers and IRS adoption taxpayer identification numbers
also take the form 000-00-0000 but include a specific number or numbers
designated by the IRS. Employer identification numbers take the form 00-
0000000."
That Internale Revenue Code distinguises and admits a SSN is the same form as a TIN and a individual TIN (hereinafter distinguished as ITIN). I have a quote from the Commissioner of Social Security, which I hope you have good faith exists, that I don't have time to search further in my records; Commissioner is approximately quoted that any a
Don't let someone bring mail matter and abandon it in a box. A post office, regulated by the Domestic Mail Manual Service Regulations, can hold general delivery mail default for 30 days (strictly to the code), but when postal patrons and non-customers fall away from enforcing the code then they only hold the general delivery mail for about 10 days (as it is now). Any mail not delivered is stamped RETURN TO SENDER, NOT DELIVERABLE, or NO SUCH PERSON AT THIS or THAT ADDRESS.
General delivery has been used since the end of Lincoln's Civil War; in the "field." Technically, all mail matter dropped off in a box in the "field" is general delivery. Before general delivery, for thousands of years there was held first a general post. Also, look in the Civil Rights Act, as it plainly states that postal patrons do NOT present identification.
I made a mistake here and wrote "clerk Richard Nixon", yet it should be changed to read as "clerk Richard Milhouse". You know how these things go... Also I can emphasize a little thing about words of art;
Remember to not alienate from the birth-right that the people are endowed by their creator; Richard and Milhouse were created nearer to what people think as God as opposed to NIXON or RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON or another occurence of "Richard Milhouse Nixon" unrelated or forged on papers as to defraud a simple and often quiet peacable man (either male or female) standing on soil or land. I take a more scientific stance on these things, but I try to work them out hand-in-hand that no ill will come to anyone. If it didn't hurt anyone's charisma, just change every appearance of the text "God" or "Almighty God" to "truth" and then that will still not change anyone's animosity towards anyone. Just recognize the living birth-right as opposed to the Freemason-issued Hospitaliar "Certificate of Birth" and you can trump anyone that coerces testimony for a SSN or related redundant enumeration to subject someone to a foreign agent and principle on the other-side of the known seas (world).
Zero, alleged "Judge" (realy an executive-ensign Admiralty administrator) Lyne T. Hughes, is quoted;
and the rest is history
First, think of the credit/debtor paradigm shift caused by commerce and the use of colorable currency that is attached to House Joint Resolution 192. You, I, do not own or even are capable of possessing a Social Security Number; it, SSN, is property of the Social Security Administration and only the Commissioner of Social Security (government over its creation) can trust whomever may use the SSN.
Second, Richard Nixon doesn't have a social security number enumerated as "567-68-0515", neither does he have a Social Security Number enumerated "567-68-0515". I don't mean to alien you with a reference, and no intention to imply that you are ignorant, but I know that Negotiable Instruments Law and Commercial Code is the government over the use of instruments. Consider that RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON is a debtor and attached to Social Security Number "567-68-0515", thereby Richard Milhouse is the the Holder in Due course of RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON (created by the Social Security Administration).
People don't write in all uppercase; it's a perpresture created to cast a shadow, that false name is artificial and subject to the regulation of Congress and legislatures. Artificial persons are subject to statutes, admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.
That is the truth. And if you want to walk in the truth, then be admonished that all signs and signatures are a matter of commerce and their compelled use is a manner of alienation by plagues of [po]lice powers, and it is good to hold the above form as follows;
peaceable assemblies as (Richard and Milhouse) Richard Milouse, NIXON (NIXON is an peacably assembled word of art, first amendment)
signatures (think nature) are congruent to peacable assemblies (Richard and Milhouse), as clerk Richard Milhouse dba RICHARD MILHOUSE NIXON (the Richard Nixon is acting in person "clerk")
signs as Richard-Milhouse: Nixon (king Nixon)
Trace the etymology of "sign" and it crosses with "king", because when the people hold the seat of government they begin court when they are seated on the king's bench (bench is english form of a latin word "bank"); so beware that you are hold of unlimited liability without Congress's limited liability in HJR 192, to setoff bills (counterfeit if not backed by lawful consideration/value); so make known that when necessity is compelled or an agent of a foreign principality (think Congress, Social Security Administration) coerces agreement or makes a presentment of a contract to someone not of unsound mind (think berthed children from the mothership), be certain to Conditionally Agree while also enscribing "under threat, duress, and coercion" because that is what THAT sy-stem is when in contract of the Judiciary Act separating the original judiciary (people) from that judiciary (We, the People incorporated and of/inferior to the such and such States united).
One problem... nematodes will feast on the Gorilla. Nematodes are the only Worms that thrive in the coldest of desert environments (even GNU HURD); and I mean Antarctica and Arctic continents! Search Nematodes in this Google cache USA TODAY article
We all know what Nematodes did to Bikini Bottom. None would suspect the nematodes... To arms!
Too much scary writing, too many misstatements, and too many numbers that just don't add up.
I know all you have said, and am re-assured.
In no derogatory way of this manner, You should know how statistics come to fruition and collected for compilation and presentment. None of the information presented was refuted by you -- it contained more measurements as percentile. If someone was watching a televesion monitor 24 hours a day and was later diagnosed with all kinds of disorders in their flesh, they would have prepared near same as I posted above, yet there are guinea pigs for the statistics and they were the people sent in Iraq. People just don't get these illnesses walking around in a desert. If it was a biased study, criticizing the known lesser contaniments (DU), with disregard to the possibility of the misplaced unknown that was among the alleged devices accused of that Iraq dictator, then I would expect it to have flaws. They're only pointing at the DU because that's all they can figure, based on rules of evidence. You can't point at the unknown and not laugh; any many should know that when I say "it came...from...the DEEP" then it is a matter unmeasurable and questionable.
I could as easily agree with your abatement as from the "statistics" I appear to have quoted. Among the alleged complications "Dr. Rokke" appears to be suffering from, ALL are internal but skin postules and the fibromyalgia. As anyone having taken Chemotherapy, we would expect "Dr. Rokke" to lose all or most of his hair, yet an photograph at a biased Rally against DU and War and all that unjoy is intended for the confident posing and public-relations that they appear to want. It's almost as though if there was any DU, then that is the cause for mutating their DNA and activate that "protester gene". The quoted statistics were relevant about "Dr. Rokke", but his fellow 30 or so dead fellow assistants are somewhat a side issue of inclusion; I would like to know what that was about -- old age, same exposure, or the DEEP. That's too high a risk for such greatly educted people to die -- they are the bread and butter of USA. And to look at that picture of "Dr. Rokke", I am reminded that his flesh is old. I'm not qualified to make any excuses as to why he thinks all his complications didn't come from a job in Iraq with deplorable working conditions. Does he collect unemployment, or -- that could be irrelevant
He can't breathe well, has fatigue, his joints and muscles hurt, acne-like blemishes on his skin (perhaps every once in a while); he is either going through another dose of puberty or he came in contract with somthing from the DEEEEEP. From that website, the Force (of their agenda/bias) is strong in that one. As far as I know, statistics are from the DEEP if they are not in affidavit form and sworn to be "true, complete, correct, not misleading, and issued in unlimited commercial liability."
You put forth some good points. It's too bad that moderators are too quick to netralize my post with a wasted mod-point and ignore yours. A rebutted post should not be moderated down, but the rebuttals below it should be moderated above it.
A statistic from the among the above cited URL, and this page as follows;
I have that available too. I thought it provable wrong and a conflict of interests to divest any studies that would not warrant their jurisdiction spread to Catalina Island. About 4 years ago, off the coast of Catalina Island at dusk when preparing for squid, I've seen a dead Bald Eagle. Same area, a year later, I've seen same. About 7 months ago some friends let me know that they were seeing many dead bird washed ashore, no less than four; none shot or with any visual external injuries, but dead. Just as long as the caught creatures are cooked thoroughly, it is healthy to eat is all we know.
DDT is out there. Capital is at stake of every interested party; see the Sedition Act.
Because he thinks money can buy Philanthropy. We hear one man rich from the efforts of the little workmen; why not hear a story of thousands of honestly rich men gifting because it was always among their choices when funds were available and not a last-ditch tax break? Despite the Officers sitting in the Microsoft seat, let's not forget about the little pall-bearers holding the Microsoft casquette under-neath it all. Who works for Microsoft, and who is claiming the ability to gift?
Hhe spreads FDA jurisdiction onto other continents! How would you like to have a foreign jurisdiction and law imposed upon you, that claims that food is a drug because it can prevent disease, or "monitor" health products and unlawfully diverts funds to the scrutiny of products beyond the scope of its charter? Bill Gates isn't even donating, but granting; as a grantor, the trust is revocable. Does anyone remember when FDA tried to re-classify Vitamin C as a "drug" as defined by FDA? It's a power grab to divert constructs of remedy with ministers of cures and drugs. I have a moldy Orange full of Vitamin C and Penecillium; I have some sun-dried Goji berries containing 15 of the 21 or such known proteins that even animal flesh has 5 or 6; remedy. FDA says drug and cure, yet everyone else says remedy.
They advertise their generosity and philactories on every news stand, and overshadow the generosity of common people that do more with what less they can give and don't ward it over eachother. If Bill Gates wanted to actually help people, he'd go drop his donation off somewhere and then walk away; but instead he is getting fiduciary capacity to where the funds may be spent and on what treatments, bringing all the pharmaceutical monopolies beyond the tidemark and plaguing other countries with the beaurocratic nightmare that Americans and citizens of the United States could never keep at bay on thin anti-trust accord.
Over here near southern California, outside on the sea from Westminster at Orange County; I've gone boating all the way to Catalina Island and beyond. There are Bald Eagles nested throughout the island as part of an environmental rehabilitation attempt. Every once in a while, someone finds an Bald Eagle floating face-down in the water. After an invasive test, it has been found that DDT poisoning is the cause, from eating raw fish infected with DDT. Then, DDT has been found all around the shoreline on the open-ocean exposed part of the island. Doing more research, Officers found that DDT was banned because it caused all kinds of health disorders and that mosquitos were becoming more immune after every generation of exposure. In the infinite wisdom of government, they decided to store the DDT in barrels, cast the barrels in cement blocks, and toss them off the southern shore of Catalina Island in what they thought was an adequately deep area.
But with every passint minute... it crumbled apart... it rusted open... and It came from the DEEP! We now have DDT poisoning. Have a nice day.
And please remember, Bald Eagles can cry only for Republican and Democratic patriotism; especially when the propoganda can only show a healthy and crieing Bald Eagle.
Greetings and blessings.
It is not possible for you to be anonymous, because I know you. We are of same flesh and bone, we drink the same water, and eat of the same crop. I gave you fat to chew on, and now I give you meat. Wicked men hide in religion behind a good name, but of their religion they are purported as otherwise. Do you actually think a dishonest church would register to the public as a church? What more to send discord among people but behind a good word as Scientific Theory, and not upheld by any scientific theory? You go ahead of yourself fast, as "biology" is the life studied, while Biology is whatever your construe that word to be in title. The bigger question of religion is whomever first applied it -- not knowing, but believing on things they've not seen or not heard.
I'm trying the best I can to uphold scientific theory, as well as those facts proven scientifically. Over here near the States, it is written that those "We the People of the State" are greatfull to Almighty God for their freedom...", and thereby, I want no ill will. I'm not throwing any stones to your way, but living water.
I don't want to say that all law is a matter of religion, yet there it stands -- school is not desired by many children because the teachers don't breath any life into the subjects -- school is coerced. Think of a world where children may choose their study, yet who is to say that they must first learn language before they can proceed to their volunteer study? I say to you, the first stones were thrown by none of us, but teachers -- because a child can't be coerced to contract the services of a teacher. If you will, I will show you, but may you proceed knowing that it is all a matter of religion?
Read it again, brother. You are a preist, dividing the truth. By this method, there is no separation of church and state because you are the prist to [ad]minister the things subject to you. I want this no offense, but it stands by itself. I count you a good neighbor to question the actions of men. Their words are subjected unto you. Everything I say is thought as a confession to a crime, but I spake with not pride, but humility, humble words. I'm not bonded to a voter, but a lector.
Many years ago, brother Thomas (Jefferson) thought to trial the effectiveness of a history without religion; his fruits was the Jefferson Bible. It's quick, and precision lost, because religion is not separable. I don't believe, I know. I hope you see the difference between a man applying religion for intent of malice, as oppposed to a man applying religion for intent of honor and respect; the State can't respect the people because they are competent and particular. If you need setting a forum to copy and move thoughts, let us look no further than Slashdot.
What would you say about a religion that asks the student to study? What of a religion that is a mere pearl that begins the first assembly of a jewel, and is good for further assembly? I don't confuse the truth with Truth. I think it not possible to hinder or allow religion into school, because the text is already assembled and effectuated to religion -- anything added or subtracted is a matter of religion. It only depends on your thoughts on schooling, because before public schools there were schools that people attended without having been coerced. Before compelled Education, as opposed to education, the people entered voluntarily by necessity.
I'm going a way, not away. As I said before, controlled environments give controlled results. I figure that I and You would not want an environment as such. Let the truth come raw, unhindered, without interpretation, and I'll accept and agree with it parens patriae; all men nowithstanding.
It should read that 2005 has risen as the Year of the highest occurence of free-speach since the Alien and Sedition Act applied to Benjamin Franklins' nephew and his printing press.
2006 should be even better, wrestling more first-hand journalism to audiences inexpensively; give or take more bias unethically asserted to the the Left and Right political paradigms instituted by government to split the people (just as George Washington predicted).
[wouldn't have known this without some speech slipping through the cracks].
God bless America (the first nation). God bless the united states of America (the people confederated). God bless the united States of America (the second-class confederacy). God bless the United States (the second nation).
And thank your nearby alien feudal society, citizens of Congress, for keeping their courts-martial out of the Courts by Titles Of Nobility Act.
From Your friendly network redundancy administrator.
I read the encyclopedia entry titled "Wedge strategy" and am not amused; it is political in no derogatory way by the little content it presents, with an enormous touch of bias quashing the couple paragraphs of concept that adhere, therewith by the author is self-evident an application of both those "Intelligent Design" and "Scientific Theory" parties. I was hoping to see more to that strategy, but it was just another application of concern, or defining the movements of one interested posse commitatus over another, equal meritless bias of both parties to the ruin of a perfectly good english word "Wedge", and is ulterior. Let me quote THAT Analysis Of Wedge (...) theory, regardless of the obvious slant on the rest of that WikiPedia article;
The same can be said of either party. They are neither devils of eachother, because the claims are without merit and as though intentionally interlapping two unrelated Fields of STUDY; the people they ensnare is intended to strawmen their meritless claims with endless chanting and chicanery with malice. I am certain, having studied the merit in both attempted jurisdiction-spreading claims of the Intelligent Design and Scientific Theory parties is that both are neither scientific and intelligent, given that they are speaking of what they think to know yesterday and barely know today and neither know what is to come. One group holds a book of a possible(theoretical) future titled Revelation, and the other holds a book of a theoretical(possible) future titled R-evolution. It is not scientific to speculate on theory beyond the Now(today), and it is idolatry to move IDeas that are built and confounded by the authority of the Principle and Agent doctrine inherent in the Uni-verse and having no improvement to the life of friends. Therefore, it is true that any disorder caused by these two feuding parties, their both tending collateral not theirs to attorney(tournament); is insurrection and terrorism, non-other but sabota
ID and Scientific Theory are two feuding commercial parties giving the facade of representing actual intelligent people holding scientific theory, and are intended to separate you from good people. If it hurt anyone that I say scientific theory is a blessing from God, then I wont say it but exercise it in my work. Don't let them spread their disease onto you; Folie a Deux. The proponents of the most wicked changes in banking (government) regulations is the hand of Masons; documented as early as Genesis 4:22 (KJVAV1611); "[22]And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron..." When any wealth, be it money or knowledge, changes hands to another tenant (realy), there come the attorneys; Matthew 24:28 (KJVAV1611) "[28]For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.]
As for your thoughts on the Bible, I'll reveal and declare to you; they are not stories of fiction (think Tubalcain, the pleading of the non-masonry Masons/guild); they are history and strategy (logic/technique), enumerated, and acknowledging the cryptic tendencies governments and rules of men have afflicted onto good people (for those Bible thumpers, think about Benjamin and His small tribe). I've studied the Bible cover to cover many times and am finding non-ending and deep truth that supports the cause of those good people not drawn in by the distractions of those two separate feuding nobilities. Study the Bible, you will see some of the foundations of the people that hate you and the witness of the people that want no ill will; Consider how the first and second enumerated bodies (chapters) of the book of Genesis speak of a God on the first six [D]ays of creation and then a LORD God for the eigth [d]ay, thereby the first speaks about the Spirit of God was on the face of the deep, and given that the so-called "waters" were existant before creation occured. Hate it if you will, but this is detailing a Form of creation that intersects with truth and the world. The people that recompiled the scriptures kept as much of the deep in it as the septuaginst had contributed; excellent english skill, that even I struggle with, therefor I reveal to any naught in the know an early comprehensive study in English for an eighth-grade 1895 graduating student at Salinas Kansas.
Continuing...The book of Revelation at the rear of the Bible says that the people are water, and Jesus looked for living water and referred to the jews in the Synagogue of Satan as dirt; sow good seed and it'll leech from both. As meteors fall from the sky, so say many people that Satan is fallen; as wateer from a cloud, so say that which seeks after Satan to saturate and subdue it. Evil people hate and throw rocks, [G]ood people bless and withal water. It gets deeper. Revelation is often thought idolatry by interpretation of the already-existant covenant because it foretells a dream, and much of the Bible has oppressed people enlightened in such a way that is impossible to prove somthing (the future) because the law says to speak nothing of the future but what is Now (today), but they still speak for "concern". It is rebutted that only inspiration from God would allow such thought to be known before its fruition, but that didn't keep people from tresspassing on the original covenant to kill another for tresspassing on the original covenant. All the prophets were thought idolaters Now; if you think calling the people as "water" isn't a hint that the Bible is as though a syllabus or codex to conceal a law or message that had been carried over time, then it naive and woah to you brother! John the baptist had a job working in one of those water purification shops -- purifying water; did he? Jesus said it is Spirit; to me, it is a sacrifice to become a neural surgeon because someone will not get the Certification until one-third of their life is consumed in study. Take your goat "GNU Hippy" to the fro
Facts bear witness of truth, and are not the complete truth themselves.
Depending if the theory is societal, worldly, solar, or universal; all the theory being alleged by both sides is moral! I'm not going to lower the heat on that bunsen burner if bacteria have souls or spirit or not.
They're both a distraction and the ends after the goal is to give the facade that they represent people with the same thoughts, allthewhile convincing idle people to join their mantra. If these two parties had any intention to help the people other than legislate their own worlds of the universe affront to the known world in the universe, then it is to legislate compelled respect and contract stipulations biased to one another. I see none of them are using affidavits, and all the matter in dispute is not theirs to dispute itself because it is not a true and correct and complete and non-misleading sampling. Finger-nail clippings of the corpus.
Somwhere, someone is typing at his keyboard and thinks that God is a figure of speach (sound, transmittal, thoughts) and the LORD God is all That inside the universe -- both inside and outside the world. Diapers and doodoo to me, because that form of science doesn't cure illness and neither does it feed the hungry. At the earliest dispute, the Talmud Jews said God is unconcious -- that's just a religious application to say that the universe and the quality of all it encompasses, is a fine (excessive order) aspect of being.
Fruitless work, proves nothing but how much more an ass one group can sit on the others' head of management and pull someone elses' finger for the pearl of great prize (that's for you mormons).
You will need:
A BLUE PEN
A RED PEN
A sticky-note for each zombie
A fire-proof wall with a nearby open window covered by a good screen and a quick-reload electron gun
Some shells, preferably K or X shells; to packet some heat across the battle-network when you are safe behind the window
Here is how a priest accomplishes the task: get on top to see where the zombies are coming from, designate a list of numbers to identify the zombies, write a number for the zombie on a note with the BLUE PEN, throw the note on a zombie's forehead, run behind the wall behind the open window, get a shell and write using the RED PEN "kill -s TERM " and the given identity number, execute, return the carriage, and repeat for each unique zombie. If you don't hide behind the wall when you execute, then some fragmented bits will splatter on your localhost; causing an infection to spread to you, the parent process; becoming a zombie to the evil BEOWULF CLUSTER of BITTORENT and FREENET users in posession of the Soule Cubicle!
[this warning brought by the DMCA, because in soviet UNITED STATES the zombies are YOU too!]