Either this is a joke, or your a 15 year old who thinks someone who steals pokemon is just like someone who steals bread, and then you have a lot to learn.
Moot point if they are gonna be struck down, they are the laws as it stands, she has broken said laws (supposedly,IDK beacuse IANAL or judge)
PACs shouldnt be allowed to lie to people. And if you actually looked beyond the fox hype, you would see its beacuse shes lying to the people shes trying to get money from, and she lied on the PAC paperwork. SO while I think its idiotic to go after her in this way, he does have a point.
Im so sorry, I feel your pain Ive got Ben Nelson, who did quiet some damage to the healthcare bill. I do have to say that your Rep, is quiet a bit more insane then my Sen., mines just greedy.
Count me in that line, id love to do something like that, as someone who is still learning, the opportunity to learn and the challenge of installing the same os on 50 different machines, actually sounds fun. Id even do it in my spare time, although not at the rate id do it if paid.
I agree with you up to a point.. unlimited means unlimited, if you or att want to cap usage, you shouldn't say unlimited. Now dont get me wrong, I think the DDOS is a poor idea, BUT I can understand the frustration behind it. (Im a Verizon customer, so im not too concerned about it anyways.)
If everyone who currently doesnt believe in global warming, believes so because they A)Want to stick with the status quo, B)Believe the government is out to get them or, C) Believe the liberal elitist secret organization is out to get them. Is a denier. If they believe the GW isn't happening due to mis-truths, lies, and blatant falsehoods that have been foisted onto them, then they are just sheep. BUT we are all but sheep. I just trust doctors, and scientists more then politicians.
Hmm so just by being imprecise the entire thing should be thrown out. I see so when my speedometer says im going 25 mph and I'm only going 24 I should replace it? Or here, the bible says that the earth is 6000 years old or some odd number like that, well its obviously imprecise, lets junk it. --- Note im just making a point that imprecisions != wrong, just an example, not an attack on religion.
"On 19 February 1942 at 0957, 188 Japanese warplanes attacked Darwin in two waves. It was the same fleet that had bombed Pearl Harbor, though a considerably larger number of bombs were dropped on Darwin than on Pearl Harbor. The attack killed at least 243 people and caused immense damage to the town. These were by far the most serious attacks on Australia in time of war, in terms of fatalities and damage. They were the first of many raids on Darwin."
There is his birth certificate, with place of birth "Honolulu", a raised stamp, stamped by the registrar that made the certified copy "Alvin T. Onaka" If you read the article, you will see how factcheck.org personally handled the document, and WHY the document IS REAL. Any other required information that is needed.. parents home towns or whatever, is not on the birth certificate, and the state gives out a short form birth certificate, there is no way to ask for a "full" one. The only time that information is on a birth certificate, is the one that is filled out by hand at the time of birth, and you cannot get that version of the certificate. so that "quasi-birth certificate" IS THE ONLY ONE HE CAN GIVE YOU.
The only issue with that is then we have scientists on both sides twisting information. I mean they dont even try to hide it from the public, for example a poll on faux news the other day added up to 120% that is who will be playing with the numbers, and telling the stupid public that the average up temps are really everything just getting cooler. They are way to many people that trust Glenn Beck more then they would trust any scientist.
Yep and how are you going to get those to work? Electronics in a car can mess up, especially if its crashed.
So lets see here, if its going to deactivate then we cant rely on a faraday cage. Those dont turn on and off IIRC. So it has to be electronic. Which means that any car that is currently running will interfere with all nearby cell signals. SO that means you cant use your cell phone ANYWHERE around a running car.
So no cell phones in parking lots, or on the sidewalks of any city really. Hell that will clear up all that iPhone usage in NYC wont it.
A quick google tells me that people having to call 911 from the trunk of their car is something that happens. http://www.wmur.com/news/15432441/detail.html Here is a story of a someone who was kidnapped and called 911 from the trunk of their WORKING car
So obviously your idea was rather poorly thought out, and thank god your not actually someone who could make that law.
I was just pointing out the massive loophole in the lets take the phones away argument. Never said that it would be cheaper over the long term. Just that you can get seriously cheap pre paid cell phones and that would make the cell phone confiscation stupid.
So if your car goes off the road and your trapped in it and its on fire, and this is reasonable, you want your phone to NOT work? Hmm if you wish for survival of the fittest to weed you and yours out, feel free, leave me out of it.
Slashdot Mirror
Either this is a joke, or your a 15 year old who thinks someone who steals pokemon is just like someone who steals bread, and then you have a lot to learn.
The citation is only to prove hes harvard educated, i dont think it has anything else to do with the topic on hand.
Considering the politician in question is a harvard educated lawyer, I'm sure he knows full well whats hes doing. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/weekinreview/01herszenhorn.html
Moot point if they are gonna be struck down, they are the laws as it stands, she has broken said laws (supposedly,IDK beacuse IANAL or judge)
PACs shouldnt be allowed to lie to people. And if you actually looked beyond the fox hype, you would see its beacuse shes lying to the people shes trying to get money from, and she lied on the PAC paperwork. SO while I think its idiotic to go after her in this way, he does have a point.
Dont forget the poll that added up to 120% http://www.mediaite.com/tv/when-120-makes-sense-fox-friends-defends-poll-display/
Im so sorry, I feel your pain Ive got Ben Nelson, who did quiet some damage to the healthcare bill. I do have to say that your Rep, is quiet a bit more insane then my Sen., mines just greedy.
Count me in that line, id love to do something like that, as someone who is still learning, the opportunity to learn and the challenge of installing the same os on 50 different machines, actually sounds fun. Id even do it in my spare time, although not at the rate id do it if paid.
weak
maybe if they drew horns on the image first
mmm totalitarianism mmmm yummy
Prenuptial?
After scrolling down I noticed others have already said similar things to earlier posts, so disregard its probably redundant.
I agree with you up to a point.. unlimited means unlimited, if you or att want to cap usage, you shouldn't say unlimited. Now dont get me wrong, I think the DDOS is a poor idea, BUT I can understand the frustration behind it. (Im a Verizon customer, so im not too concerned about it anyways.)
It worked in blazing saddles, thats why.
I just don't think the proposed "solutions" will solve it and I don't think that reducing output will stop it.
If a car is about to hit a kid, and you dont think you could save him would you walk away without trying?
If everyone who currently doesnt believe in global warming, believes so because they A)Want to stick with the status quo, B)Believe the government is out to get them or, C) Believe the liberal elitist secret organization is out to get them. Is a denier. If they believe the GW isn't happening due to mis-truths, lies, and blatant falsehoods that have been foisted onto them, then they are just sheep. BUT we are all but sheep. I just trust doctors, and scientists more then politicians.
Source?
Hmm so just by being imprecise the entire thing should be thrown out. I see so when my speedometer says im going 25 mph and I'm only going 24 I should replace it? Or here, the bible says that the earth is 6000 years old or some odd number like that, well its obviously imprecise, lets junk it. --- Note im just making a point that imprecisions != wrong, just an example, not an attack on religion.
"On 19 February 1942 at 0957, 188 Japanese warplanes attacked Darwin in two waves. It was the same fleet that had bombed Pearl Harbor, though a considerably larger number of bombs were dropped on Darwin than on Pearl Harbor. The attack killed at least 243 people and caused immense damage to the town. These were by far the most serious attacks on Australia in time of war, in terms of fatalities and damage. They were the first of many raids on Darwin."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin,_Australia#1900_to_present
There is his birth certificate, with place of birth "Honolulu", a raised stamp, stamped by the registrar that made the certified copy "Alvin T. Onaka" If you read the article, you will see how factcheck.org personally handled the document, and WHY the document IS REAL. Any other required information that is needed.. parents home towns or whatever, is not on the birth certificate, and the state gives out a short form birth certificate, there is no way to ask for a "full" one. The only time that information is on a birth certificate, is the one that is filled out by hand at the time of birth, and you cannot get that version of the certificate. so that "quasi-birth certificate" IS THE ONLY ONE HE CAN GIVE YOU.
They are going to deny till they are blue in the face. I agree with you but I dont see it making a difference to some people.
The only issue with that is then we have scientists on both sides twisting information. I mean they dont even try to hide it from the public, for example a poll on faux news the other day added up to 120% that is who will be playing with the numbers, and telling the stupid public that the average up temps are really everything just getting cooler. They are way to many people that trust Glenn Beck more then they would trust any scientist.
Yep and how are you going to get those to work? Electronics in a car can mess up, especially if its crashed.
So lets see here, if its going to deactivate then we cant rely on a faraday cage. Those dont turn on and off IIRC. So it has to be electronic. Which means that any car that is currently running will interfere with all nearby cell signals. SO that means you cant use your cell phone ANYWHERE around a running car.
So no cell phones in parking lots, or on the sidewalks of any city really. Hell that will clear up all that iPhone usage in NYC wont it.
A quick google tells me that people having to call 911 from the trunk of their car is something that happens. http://www.wmur.com/news/15432441/detail.html Here is a story of a someone who was kidnapped and called 911 from the trunk of their WORKING car
So obviously your idea was rather poorly thought out, and thank god your not actually someone who could make that law.
I was just pointing out the massive loophole in the lets take the phones away argument. Never said that it would be cheaper over the long term. Just that you can get seriously cheap pre paid cell phones and that would make the cell phone confiscation stupid.
So if your car goes off the road and your trapped in it and its on fire, and this is reasonable, you want your phone to NOT work? Hmm if you wish for survival of the fittest to weed you and yours out, feel free, leave me out of it.