Even with such a system in place, there has to be a way to tunnel out. But the worst blockage is at the ISP. Without them, there is no internet. The internet needs to route around them.
New and better circumvention tools are on the way, but even they can't through an ISP that cuts you off entirely. I hope wireless mesh can get around that problem eventually.
Doesn't matter, it's still bogus, and it's censorship that must be circumvented. Without resistance, it can only get worse, and the disease will spread.
If it's centralized, it's not mesh. Though it is good to see more development in this area. Once we can make it decentralized, we'll have an internet that nobody can turn off. And that, ladies and gentlemen, would be a great thing.
"The wicked and lazy master was the one who buried his talent in the ground and didn’t do anything to multiply it... That’s essentially what those who say we need to stop using oil, coal and natural gas are telling us to do. Just leave those resources buried in the ground, rather than pulling them out and multiplying their value for human benefit."
Yeah but who here doesn't love an unaccountable tribunal? I mean, the name Trust and Safety Council just drips with power! Can't you feel it? Your inner Klingon? Wwwwooof!
I do, but as I become a tiny minority, long term stability in the programs I use will cease to exist for lack of demand. Eh, whatever, the throwaway society is dominating all facets. Indeed, you are more than welcome to it.
I have seen the change logs, and in my opinion they reflect no improvement over the decades old all inclusive program that preceded it. And for those who remember, when it first came out Firefox was supposed to be lean and fast and *stripped of cruft*. It's not any of those things now. I don't know of any single browser right now that is not a 30+ megabyte download, and they all run about the same speed. I see no disadvantage of sticking with something a bit more familiar that I can run for years without having to think about "upgrades". And when I do upgrade, at least it still has the same familiar face from last century, hasn't aged a bit.
Slashdot Mirror
Even with such a system in place, there has to be a way to tunnel out. But the worst blockage is at the ISP. Without them, there is no internet. The internet needs to route around them.
New and better circumvention tools are on the way, but even they can't through an ISP that cuts you off entirely. I hope wireless mesh can get around that problem eventually.
Both are valid. You needn't take such things so seriously...
How will you know? I don't trust them not to censor global searches.
These aren't "privacy laws". They are simple censorship. The information on Google is not private.
Doesn't matter, it's still bogus, and it's censorship that must be circumvented. Without resistance, it can only get worse, and the disease will spread.
Now's the time... Stuff like this make it pretty damn worthless. We need a simple indexer, not a censor emitting propaganda.
oppose due to political risk.
Yes, the risk is having an internet that can't be turn off, or censored. Control of content would be lost.
"Centralised"
If it's centralized, it's not mesh. Though it is good to see more development in this area. Once we can make it decentralized, we'll have an internet that nobody can turn off. And that, ladies and gentlemen, would be a great thing.
Nothing is over! Nothing! You just don't turn it off!
Oh please! Just stop...
Came out of the link, which you would have known if you read it, or if you can read. You are forgiven..
Which obviously means she supports it but can't say so yet until the election is secured.
...who is responsible for it's contents?
Industries seeking cheap/free labor, indefinite copyright, and special protections from the state. They are the ones who wrote the bill.
If Hillary wins, it may be dead because Bernie has forced her to take a stand against it.
Do you really believe campaign propaganda?
They can buy it when it no longer spews poison into the air that we all have to breathe. I don't believe encryption has that problem.
Why was this modded down? It's true
"The wicked and lazy master was the one who buried his talent in the ground and didn’t do anything to multiply it... That’s essentially what those who say we need to stop using oil, coal and natural gas are telling us to do. Just leave those resources buried in the ground, rather than pulling them out and multiplying their value for human benefit."
Don't give up on them. This is a challenge. That is what every blockage is.
Yeah but who here doesn't love an unaccountable tribunal? I mean, the name Trust and Safety Council just drips with power! Can't you feel it? Your inner Klingon? Wwwwooof!
read the other post to learn the meaning of the word 'tapas'
*a wide variety of appetizers, or snacks, in Spanish cuisine.*
A little closer to a dumb pipe. Now, let's get those upload speeds where they belong.
Sitting six inches from a CRT wasn't so bad for you after all.
So why not just do that then?
I do, but as I become a tiny minority, long term stability in the programs I use will cease to exist for lack of demand. Eh, whatever, the throwaway society is dominating all facets. Indeed, you are more than welcome to it.
I have seen the change logs, and in my opinion they reflect no improvement over the decades old all inclusive program that preceded it. And for those who remember, when it first came out Firefox was supposed to be lean and fast and *stripped of cruft*. It's not any of those things now. I don't know of any single browser right now that is not a 30+ megabyte download, and they all run about the same speed. I see no disadvantage of sticking with something a bit more familiar that I can run for years without having to think about "upgrades". And when I do upgrade, at least it still has the same familiar face from last century, hasn't aged a bit.
Why would it need a tube? Well, at supersonic speeds, I do believe it would be more comfortable inside the vehicle.