I don't see anything particularly 'modern' here, or even particularly human. 'Modern' is that we do everything faster now. Sometimes it's better, sometimes it's not. I'm only taking potshots at the unifying force of the universe that subjugates us all.
I think you'll get a better idea how things are by watching the Animal Planet. Replace Smith, Marx, and Ricardo with Pavlov, Skinner, and Freud... Their tests have proven to be more reproducible.
Sorry, I want more transparency and oversight than you apparently do. In the meantime all our shortages can be alleviated using the resources we already have at our immediate disposal, that we know are safe. There is no reason to get all hasty with this GMO stuff. It only treats a symptom of human corruption, and not very well.
If you want to advertise to your customers that you're GMO free, knock yourself out.
:-) Just thought I'd rub it in with another example of the corruption we are dealing with (That one took two years to overcome, and it's still not a complete victory)
So now you know, if we are not going to be allowed to label our own food without all this resistance, then we must demand the government do it for us. We need the industry to provide the service, not make the rules.
Construction (specifically in unsafe locations near the coast on fault lines), operation, maintenance, waste disposal (they're throwing away a lot of free energy there), cost overruns and funds unaccounted for. Pretty much the entire thing. We handed the entire business to used car salesmen, and so we need to fix it!
If you want to advertise to your customers that you're GMO free, knock yourself out.
Really now?[pdf] Yeah, I guess, with enough lawyers you can do anything. (luckily that case went the right way)
Well then, nobody should complain if I want sell cyanide and heroin on the street corner. Big business has proven to be very corrupt in the way they operate. GMOs by themselves aren't necessarily the problem. But it's being handled badly, kinda like nuclear power, perfectly safe, but grossly mismanaged. Right now we must demand simple transparency and put labeling on the package. People must be allowed the choice of what to ingest. If contamination is a risk, then a ban is the appropriate response, even though this stuff, like Chinese smog, has absolutely no respect for national borders.
It powered the industrial revolution. People are crazy now, but the food cooks much faster in our shiny new Radarange, so now we have more time to work in the sugar caves!
Every day we reach new levels of cynicism. It is yet another demonstration of the triumph of public relations over scientific fact. It's slowing down the anti pollution efforts, why not give a try here?
You are absolutely correct, I bring up these points myself occasionally, but there's too much shouting in here. Nobody is going to hear you. They'd rather philosophize and sound all superior 'n stuff.
We don't need this stuff, when simple good farming practices and an end to widespread war will feed us all many times over. But there is little profit in abundance. We are doing it like bad medical practice, where you need a second drug to reduce the side effects of the first, then you need a third to do the same for the second, and so on and so forth. This also happens to be why computer programs become so bloated. The problem seems to be universal.
Yeah, we do have the right to make corporations comply with the norms of the community it effects, but they are rights we don't enforce. So please save your breath. Your style overwhelms your message, both of which only show you're just a schmuck! You know where to take it...
There were six or eight of them. It doesn't look like you need them all to maintain control, and they're also protected inside the cage. The ones around the prop tips and the base were free floating. The overall design just makes much more sense, being safer and far more robust. I am surprised it doesn't dominate the market. It did cost a lot of money to make the first time, but it's an old video, and being a military project, well, you know the routine there. Prices should be comparable now.
Slashdot Mirror
Economists are basically astrologers, thus charlatans. I can't stand them. Not that psychologists and lawyers are far behind :-)
I don't see anything particularly 'modern' here, or even particularly human. 'Modern' is that we do everything faster now. Sometimes it's better, sometimes it's not. I'm only taking potshots at the unifying force of the universe that subjugates us all.
I think you'll get a better idea how things are by watching the Animal Planet. Replace Smith, Marx, and Ricardo with Pavlov, Skinner, and Freud... Their tests have proven to be more reproducible.
[I said that wrong]
It should read, *It only paints over a symptom of human corruption, and not very well.*
Sorry, I want more transparency and oversight than you apparently do. In the meantime all our shortages can be alleviated using the resources we already have at our immediate disposal, that we know are safe. There is no reason to get all hasty with this GMO stuff. It only treats a symptom of human corruption, and not very well.
If you want to advertise to your customers that you're GMO free, knock yourself out.
So now you know, if we are not going to be allowed to label our own food without all this resistance, then we must demand the government do it for us. We need the industry to provide the service, not make the rules.
How so? What specifically is being mismanaged?
Construction (specifically in unsafe locations near the coast on fault lines), operation, maintenance, waste disposal (they're throwing away a lot of free energy there), cost overruns and funds unaccounted for. Pretty much the entire thing. We handed the entire business to used car salesmen, and so we need to fix it!
If you want to advertise to your customers that you're GMO free, knock yourself out.
Really now?[pdf] Yeah, I guess, with enough lawyers you can do anything. (luckily that case went the right way)
Your post reads like a industry press release.
You should know that posting these kinds of stories is like screaming, "beetlejuice! beetlejuice! beetlejuice!" in a crowded forum.
Oy! and the bandwidth and data usage!
Well then, nobody should complain if I want sell cyanide and heroin on the street corner. Big business has proven to be very corrupt in the way they operate. GMOs by themselves aren't necessarily the problem. But it's being handled badly, kinda like nuclear power, perfectly safe, but grossly mismanaged. Right now we must demand simple transparency and put labeling on the package. People must be allowed the choice of what to ingest. If contamination is a risk, then a ban is the appropriate response, even though this stuff, like Chinese smog, has absolutely no respect for national borders.
It powered the industrial revolution. People are crazy now, but the food cooks much faster in our shiny new Radarange, so now we have more time to work in the sugar caves!
Every day we reach new levels of cynicism. It is yet another demonstration of the triumph of public relations over scientific fact. It's slowing down the anti pollution efforts, why not give a try here?
Well, since all food shortages and widespread malnutrition are caused by human corruption and waste, please tell us, why do we need it?
You are absolutely correct, I bring up these points myself occasionally, but there's too much shouting in here. Nobody is going to hear you. They'd rather philosophize and sound all superior 'n stuff.
We don't need this stuff, when simple good farming practices and an end to widespread war will feed us all many times over. But there is little profit in abundance. We are doing it like bad medical practice, where you need a second drug to reduce the side effects of the first, then you need a third to do the same for the second, and so on and so forth. This also happens to be why computer programs become so bloated. The problem seems to be universal.
Yes really! Will somebody please tell them the war is over?
What, humans aren't natural? Where did we come from then?
the software was unfinished.
codenamed 'Schubert'?
That's why I reload my paintballs with my own special mix...
You don't have to hide behind the AC moniker. Here you can speak freely, Mr. Madoff...
With this level of finances that's completely inexcusable.
With this level of finances the temptations are overwhelming. Any mark that doesn't demand a cut is an idiot.
Now that would be a cool contest! Man against nature..
Who?
Yeah, we do have the right to make corporations comply with the norms of the community it effects, but they are rights we don't enforce. So please save your breath. Your style overwhelms your message, both of which only show you're just a schmuck! You know where to take it...
You don't have to break the prop. Just get it tangled up in the fish net. The globe can bounce off of it.
There were six or eight of them. It doesn't look like you need them all to maintain control, and they're also protected inside the cage. The ones around the prop tips and the base were free floating. The overall design just makes much more sense, being safer and far more robust. I am surprised it doesn't dominate the market. It did cost a lot of money to make the first time, but it's an old video, and being a military project, well, you know the routine there. Prices should be comparable now.