You are not stuck with anything. Nobody wants to be inconvenienced with having to pay attention and seeking suitable candidates. The non voter is the biggest voting block there is. If they settled on somebody, we could be rid of the republicans and democrats for good. All you need to do is tune out the bullshit coming from the carny hucksters that are winning today. That alone will reduce the value of the campaign dollar to zero immediately, and would settle this silliness over 'Citizens United'.
Well, under the law, things are different. But the law only serves the money that bought it. Otherwise you are just full of it, speaking up for rent collectors and speculators. You are not being displaced.
Ideas are not physical things. They are smoke and light. Once you release them, they is no longer exclusively yours, aside from the possession of your copies. The taking of real, physical property involves real, involuntary displacement or separation.
That is just not so! A car you can fix with a hammer and screwdriver is perfect, and if you know which end of the screwdriver to hit, your car would always be in tip-top condition. And I bet you can still find a 30 dollar alternator out there, and regular sealed beam headlamps for around 5 or 10, maybe?
Ain't gonna happen. The average user will prefer it that way. It will be more convenient for them. What might happen is that people will demand that all costs, repair, insurance, registration, etc be included in the monthly payments. We don't own anything anymore, not even our bodies. Civil forfeiture and common medical practice saw to that. The government/repo man can come and take what they want, and resistance will be most feeble at best.
For examples, please see every Supreme Court ruling in free speech cases.
Precisely my point. All those cases should be reversed. The law is explicit and precise. They can be wrong, like when they upheld the property rights of slave owners.
You can promise anything. If you want the law to reflect something else you need to put it in writing, in the constitution. The 1st Amendment codifies free speech into law. The triggerman is responsible for his actions. He alone make the choice to take the money and pull the trigger. What you are offering up is no different than the *I was just following orders* routine.
:-) Let's see what Snowden brings home from the Russians, eh? Like you said, the documents he has are only a little more embarrassing than Anna Nicole Smith's immigration application.
Slashdot Mirror
The president could abolish the DEA tomorrow if he wishes. It exists at the pleasure of the executive.
You are not stuck with anything. Nobody wants to be inconvenienced with having to pay attention and seeking suitable candidates. The non voter is the biggest voting block there is. If they settled on somebody, we could be rid of the republicans and democrats for good. All you need to do is tune out the bullshit coming from the carny hucksters that are winning today. That alone will reduce the value of the campaign dollar to zero immediately, and would settle this silliness over 'Citizens United'.
Well, under the law, things are different. But the law only serves the money that bought it. Otherwise you are just full of it, speaking up for rent collectors and speculators. You are not being displaced.
...need to be beaten with a hard-bound copy...
Or, you know, need to be voted out of office, not reelected to a 40 year career by people only looking for a bigger 'tax cut'(handout)
No, that's not the way Microsoft wants it, precisely because Linux can do more and faster with the same hardware.
is?? are!!
Ideas are not physical things. They are smoke and light. Once you release them, they is no longer exclusively yours, aside from the possession of your copies. The taking of real, physical property involves real, involuntary displacement or separation.
IS being the subjective word.
Define 'IS', please
*New* tech, coming soon
...everyone always wants more power to do their job more effectively, is that we have weak politicians that grant it too easily.
The voters don't give a shit about the police. Just don't touch the NHS!
Cain started it, when he killed his brother.
Make no mistake. This is the 1980s all over again with Iran also being supplied 'in secret'. Play both sides, double the profits.
Cars from the 60's-70's suck big time.
That is just not so! A car you can fix with a hammer and screwdriver is perfect, and if you know which end of the screwdriver to hit, your car would always be in tip-top condition. And I bet you can still find a 30 dollar alternator out there, and regular sealed beam headlamps for around 5 or 10, maybe?
And there is a reason not to name all these 'offenders'? You know, just for informational purposes...
Ain't gonna happen. The average user will prefer it that way. It will be more convenient for them. What might happen is that people will demand that all costs, repair, insurance, registration, etc be included in the monthly payments. We don't own anything anymore, not even our bodies. Civil forfeiture and common medical practice saw to that. The government/repo man can come and take what they want, and resistance will be most feeble at best.
And they won't ration his water...
Well, there ya go...
everybody can pay a flat fee for infrastructure hookup.
Who pays for load balancing and necessary infrastructure for what you suggest?
Gee, I don't know what to tell ya...
Strawman's on fire!
Where/are his methods not effective? Where is the fraud? Words are not action.
For examples, please see every Supreme Court ruling in free speech cases.
Precisely my point. All those cases should be reversed. The law is explicit and precise. They can be wrong, like when they upheld the property rights of slave owners.
You can promise anything. If you want the law to reflect something else you need to put it in writing, in the constitution. The 1st Amendment codifies free speech into law. The triggerman is responsible for his actions. He alone make the choice to take the money and pull the trigger. What you are offering up is no different than the *I was just following orders* routine.
What he was going to do was speak. It has everything to do with the 1st.
:-) Let's see what Snowden brings home from the Russians, eh? Like you said, the documents he has are only a little more embarrassing than Anna Nicole Smith's immigration application.
You can't go around implying 'limitations' that are not written into the law. And you sure as hell shouldn't be able to lock up people over it.