It is not fault tolerant when you only have one provider selling the service. The seller has internet anywhere in the world now. We already have the tech. And we receive it via supply side economics. That is its single biggest point of failure. More money is spent on blocking the internet than building it. That is what we have to change.
But I don't relish the possibility of something like this having a kill switch. We need an internet that nobody can interfere with, independent of the current business model, we also need the same for food, shelter, energy, and transportation, so I guess I'm barking up a tree without a paddle.
I really don't think anybody needs people like you lecturing us on our travel habits. Instead, maybe you should focus on the corruption in these markets and how they fix prices, and demand better machines that cause less damage.
Life's that horrible there, eh? Gee, I can't figure out why the place hasn't been abandoned yet. I mean the exodus must be biblical in size. Well, maybe one quick stop in Palm Springs can't hurt...
Well, I figure he almost reads them right, seeing that the 'liberal democrat' is a farce and a fantasy anyway. There are no liberals in the roots of that party. There are no principles in either. There is only money. And the real liberals that are dumb enough to believe in them (for like 50 years now!) continue to carry their water in false hope. And none of this is new. The liberal faction has always been very small and ineffectual, acting mostly as a prop to provide the image of opposition. You will not see 'liberal democrats' with real influence and power. Those things turn everybody very conservative pretty quick. Obama was quite overt about it, but that's the way it has always been.
Survival of the fittest has nothing to do with individual response to individual stimuli.
Well, indirectly it does. Those who respond a certain way might be more likely to survive and prevail, passing on all their goodies to the next generation.
...I am surprised that they are publicly admitting it.
Why? They know that nobody cares, in fact the public wants more to *feel safe*. These people can rape your mother on national TV and still win an election. They don't have to hide anything anymore. The election results verify that every time. How to counter that should be the target of discussion. Then a solution to all these other issues will emerge.
Then we may, "in principle" target the communications of government spies. It is the only way we can level the playing field. Since we have no privacy, let's take away theirs.
There is still a transaction. A pattern of its traffic will emerge and be easily detectable. The best way to conduct business is to just blend in with the noise the best you can.
Slashdot Mirror
It is not fault tolerant when you only have one provider selling the service. The seller has internet anywhere in the world now. We already have the tech. And we receive it via supply side economics. That is its single biggest point of failure. More money is spent on blocking the internet than building it. That is what we have to change.
But I don't relish the possibility of something like this having a kill switch. We need an internet that nobody can interfere with, independent of the current business model, we also need the same for food, shelter, energy, and transportation, so I guess I'm barking up a tree without a paddle.
It's a seller's market.
I really don't think anybody needs people like you lecturing us on our travel habits. Instead, maybe you should focus on the corruption in these markets and how they fix prices, and demand better machines that cause less damage.
You people really think this is a coincidence, or about 'supply and demand'? How many times you gonna buy that bridge?
Yeah, watch your money do a disappearing act and take a 'magic leap' offshore...
Let me put it another way. Is it statistically noticeable? Do gas and cigarette taxes have to go up to match the losses?
I would move there just to watch California and Florida drivers mix it up.
Life's that horrible there, eh? Gee, I can't figure out why the place hasn't been abandoned yet. I mean the exodus must be biblical in size. Well, maybe one quick stop in Palm Springs can't hurt...
Actually, that's Steven Rosenfeld's response.
Well, I figure he almost reads them right, seeing that the 'liberal democrat' is a farce and a fantasy anyway. There are no liberals in the roots of that party. There are no principles in either. There is only money. And the real liberals that are dumb enough to believe in them (for like 50 years now!) continue to carry their water in false hope. And none of this is new. The liberal faction has always been very small and ineffectual, acting mostly as a prop to provide the image of opposition. You will not see 'liberal democrats' with real influence and power. Those things turn everybody very conservative pretty quick. Obama was quite overt about it, but that's the way it has always been.
OMG! ROFLMAO!
Ow wait, you're serious? Now I wanna cry...
As far as I can tell, voters roundly rejected authoritarian Democrats this time around.
And this is the party's response.. Somebody is reading the numbers wrong.
Oh lord! If only the internet was filled with people who know how to use a camera and edit footage...
Oh now you done it! now we gotta define 'own' and 'volition'...
And I hope you're not to going to tell us than somebody in coma is not alive because he can't move.
Ohhhh no... I'm not trying that one again... First my iPhone, and now this?
Well, you did specify nothing, as in nothing, at least that is what the word means to me... Relax... You don't need to get all defensive about it :-)
Survival of the fittest has nothing to do with individual response to individual stimuli.
Well, indirectly it does. Those who respond a certain way might be more likely to survive and prevail, passing on all their goodies to the next generation.
And a robot built by another robot? What would that be? Really, what happens when we mechanize everything?
Define life...
Spies should respect laws and constitutions...
Oh come now! The very essence of spying is clandestine. The law doesn't apply. Only the rules of their superiors matter.
...I am surprised that they are publicly admitting it.
Why? They know that nobody cares, in fact the public wants more to *feel safe*. These people can rape your mother on national TV and still win an election. They don't have to hide anything anymore. The election results verify that every time. How to counter that should be the target of discussion. Then a solution to all these other issues will emerge.
Then we may, "in principle" target the communications of government spies. It is the only way we can level the playing field. Since we have no privacy, let's take away theirs.
There is still a transaction. A pattern of its traffic will emerge and be easily detectable. The best way to conduct business is to just blend in with the noise the best you can.
Well, yes, we already do, so the banks don't have to. You should be pleased.
You'll have to keep them to yourself then. If you don't want the light to shine, don't turn on the lamp.