The units built into the seat backs will serve. And now, with more convenient spacing, it will be much easier to reach the touchscreen. The tray table, which is now jabbing your chest, will be the keyboard.
Or we could elect a different class of politicians instead of following blind tribalism. Sorry, but all this is self inflicted, and every chance they have, the voters only make it worse.
I hope you realize the futility of lecturing psychopaths. The choice belongs to the voters. Either they vote for them or not. At the very least let's recognize where the problem is. Hint: The politicians are a mere reflection.
They are simply one in the same and inseparable. It really makes no difference which department is in charge. Protection of their wealth from the ravaging hoards is the singular goal.
The government is bound and dominated by corporate funding ('donations', media promotion, etc.), which will go elsewhere if the state does not play ball. Revolution is a big expense, but not out of reach. The wars in the middle east (and Central/South America) are about business, not any silly ideology, which is just a low wage motivator. Also note where most top level government appointees come from. They are juiced in. It should be pretty obvious who rules overs whom. Granted, the cause is voter disinterest and antipathy, but that doesn't matter. Most everybody is wagging the dog. The government acts as security and hired gun for its financiers. It is truly a servant to specific interests.
So what if it's theater? It's very effective theater. And there's still no significant downward trend in airline travel, no matter how miserable they try to make it. The bright side is that the screens built into the seats will be much closer and easier to reach.
Slashdot Mirror
The units built into the seat backs will serve. And now, with more convenient spacing, it will be much easier to reach the touchscreen. The tray table, which is now jabbing your chest, will be the keyboard.
Or we could elect a different class of politicians instead of following blind tribalism. Sorry, but all this is self inflicted, and every chance they have, the voters only make it worse.
Cui bono? Ask nothing else...
Europe is now a war zone
Eh, 71 years of relative peace... not a bad run, in fact, probably a record.
A lot of people do. This stuff is good business. It's no lie: They're only in it for the money.
I hope you realize the futility of lecturing psychopaths. The choice belongs to the voters. Either they vote for them or not. At the very least let's recognize where the problem is. Hint: The politicians are a mere reflection.
The janitor just tripped over the extension cord?
They're doing it wrong
They are simply one in the same and inseparable. It really makes no difference which department is in charge. Protection of their wealth from the ravaging hoards is the singular goal.
Because it is accelerating!
The pyramid is opening!
Which one?
The one with the ever widening hole in it!
Hmm, some of the USA's impact is actually China's.
Sometimes the result is the empty set.
I turned mine into an aquarium.
I don't see that kind of behavior from CNN.
Except when they're cheerleading for more war
It is a much more complicated case than you let on.
No, it is not complicated at all. It's a simple 1st Amendment issue. But ever since 1798 free speech in the USA is quite dead.
The government is bound and dominated by corporate funding ('donations', media promotion, etc.), which will go elsewhere if the state does not play ball. Revolution is a big expense, but not out of reach. The wars in the middle east (and Central/South America) are about business, not any silly ideology, which is just a low wage motivator. Also note where most top level government appointees come from. They are juiced in. It should be pretty obvious who rules overs whom. Granted, the cause is voter disinterest and antipathy, but that doesn't matter. Most everybody is wagging the dog. The government acts as security and hired gun for its financiers. It is truly a servant to specific interests.
When corporations can force people to hand over their wealth under threat of incarceration and/or violence, I'll take your perspective seriously.
You mean, like this?
No, I'm sorry... The correct answer is ~13,400 kilos
Oh c'mon... It's only 120 million euros. How much is that in Beluga Caviar?
until the entire movie is computer composed? It's not much of a stretch.
Corporate and state are a distinction without a difference.
Yes, the product they are selling is theater, not security. And the campaign is a remarkable success.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"
I still insist that everybody has that backwards
with a CEO like Alex Cruz
Ted's evil twin, separated at birth?
Size matters... I mean, that's what I've heard..
So what if it's theater? It's very effective theater. And there's still no significant downward trend in airline travel, no matter how miserable they try to make it. The bright side is that the screens built into the seats will be much closer and easier to reach.