didn't the Man read the text Philes from teh 80's and realize that it was only a matter of time until us 10 year olds grew up and made a mass-producible car accessory to do this?
I think instead of asking 11 different people, they should have just given all the space to Margaret Cho because her fractured take on modern life lends me a new perspective that may often be humorous, but is always insightful. That and her fat face reminds me of Prednisone.
It's disappointing to see so many people excited about the advent of digital projection in movie theaters without examining both sides. It reminds me of the debate about marijuana, where the proponents go totally overboard, wildly advocating unfounded benefits and telling stories about Thomas Jefferson, while their opponents don't do much better. Digital projection is fine for home use, since it's mostly affordable, lightweight, and puts up a decent picture. But if you were familiar with the home theater enthusiast's domain, you'd know that their holy grail is to find a "film-like" image. Even Roger Ebert's best endorsement of a projector was for one CRT based ("looked like film"). More interesting is the idea of running film at something more like 40fps. Roger Ebert saw this and was floored by the improvement over traditional 24fps film. One of the great benefits of this approach is that retrofitting existing projectors is easily affordable; I'm thinking around $5000. Also, it's easy to retrofit existing cameras. I don't know anything about business or money, but $100,000 for a single new digital projection system just doesn't sound right.
Slashdot Mirror
didn't the Man read the text Philes from teh 80's and realize that it was only a matter of time until us 10 year olds grew up and made a mass-producible car accessory to do this?
99% of my time spent at work is reading slashdot and adding backdoors / easter eggs to the code base.
I think instead of asking 11 different people, they should have just given all the space to Margaret Cho because her fractured take on modern life lends me a new perspective that may often be humorous, but is always insightful. That and her fat face reminds me of Prednisone.
Not enough great discoveries in recent times?
Has this stiff ever seen a goddamn Tivo??
Or internet porn??
In capitalist america, blah blah blah blah.
Have any of you nerds tried programming in C#?
It sucks.
What the hell is Mono anyway?
Who cares?
Do you know why programmers always confuse halloween and christmas?
hhahahahahahahahaha
Just because it's released on IMAX doesn't mean it was filmed better than 35mm.
You retard.
Where Tom Hanks became really TALL and rented a SPACIOUS apartment with HEAVY pinball games.
in soviet russia, gay idiot movie trailer download you!
It's disappointing to see so many people excited about the advent of digital projection in movie theaters without examining both sides. It reminds me of the debate about marijuana, where the proponents go totally overboard, wildly advocating unfounded benefits and telling stories about Thomas Jefferson, while their opponents don't do much better. Digital projection is fine for home use, since it's mostly affordable, lightweight, and puts up a decent picture. But if you were familiar with the home theater enthusiast's domain, you'd know that their holy grail is to find a "film-like" image. Even Roger Ebert's best endorsement of a projector was for one CRT based ("looked like film"). More interesting is the idea of running film at something more like 40fps. Roger Ebert saw this and was floored by the improvement over traditional 24fps film. One of the great benefits of this approach is that retrofitting existing projectors is easily affordable; I'm thinking around $5000. Also, it's easy to retrofit existing cameras. I don't know anything about business or money, but $100,000 for a single new digital projection system just doesn't sound right.
Have a look at HKLM->Software->Microsoft->Keyboard All the extra buttons are configured there.