Oh, we understand that others are reading but that doesn't mean we have to change our ways to cater to your desires because you came here so you change to the local customs. Why is it that if I visit your country you will complain if I complain about it not being like the US but then you expect us in the US to change to meet your local customs? Hypocrite much?
Your complaining is like me reading the Guardian online and complaining about all the misspellings.
but I think they did mean that it doesn't matter that they may have different attributes as long as they both receive the same reward regardless of effort exerted adn such. Otherwise, racism or sexism or lack of multi-culturalism.
Displaced coal-miners because of "dirty coal" has nothing to do with robotics and such. This seems to be an argument between to leftists about how best to help the "little people" they just screwed over.
Yes dbIII, those guys are leftists not libertarians, I knnow the first letter being the same is confusing and all. Or maybe you can show me how they are really just the Koch brothers in disguise.
Oh, like Obama wanting a stronger federal government that regulates nearly aspect of my life, doesn't allow the use of public lands for what they were originally intended for.
Okay, glad we are on the same page except I didn't realize the Koch brothers were such strong backers of Obama. I guess I'll have to dig way deeper. Thanks for the insight there.
When in reality, nobody is wanting to see any of the Koch family become any kind of King so a bit of education would be in order.
If you want a modern-day example of someone desiring to be a King, look no further than someone who has obtained an office and has publicly stated that he intends to make law by executive order if Congress will not make the laws he wants. That is much closer to being King than spending money, which, by the way, plenty of liberal/progressives do as well: Soros and Bloomberg are the two most well-known.
Yes, it is stealing in the sense that "stealing" is synonymous with "theft" and the act of copying such things without permission has been defined as theft in many legal jurisdictions.
Just because you don't want it to be so don't make it be so.
So it is actually not liberals/progressives who support Affirmative Action? I ask because Affirmative Action means exactly having different standards for different races, as in lower test scores and GPA for those races but higher for that race. Most people read having different standards for different races as discriminating based on race but as the previous poster said... Liberals don't actually see discrimination as discrimination, they see it as "action".
Are you really so confused about the definition of terms that you somehow find advocating for a dictator to be the same as libertarian. Actually study something and learn and be educated before you do any more damage to society.
They also said that the 2nd amendment guaranteed the right of private citizen's to own and carry firearms. That good enough for you that you will demand that your politicians stop trying to pass laws contrary to that opinion?
Functional for a much different reason and definitely not new and non-obvious. I learned in my early mechanical design classes that nothing should have sharp edges because sharp edges are stress points and stress points lead to fractures and fractures are a problem. The stress points are as much (or more) of a problem for the molds than for the parts in some cases as well.
In other words, Apple engineers "discovered" what they were taught in engineering school and the patent office screwed up.
I call BS. We are talking FOSS here so there can be absolutely no security issue because it was produced by a large community of do-gooders who vetted all commits for us and this means that every bug gets caught within seconds of being committed.
It is a fact (not theory or guess) that only commercial, closed software has security flaws.
And yet they are 3 of the 5 that realized that Chris Matthews* is actually an employee of a corporation and that there is no actual way to distinguish his employer from a documentary film maker so they chose to allow Chris Matthews to continue to be employed by a corporation to do what he does and to let the documentary film maker also continue. However, you and Chris Matthews would be happier if all 9 had agreed that being employed by a corporation meant making no more politically oriented speech so that Chris Matthews would be unemployed.
*Please substitute your favorite reporter/media personality whatever that makes a living by being "the media."
They only declined to expedite the case by having it skip the normal appeals process; they did not decline to hear it at all. And, as the case now stands, a decline to hear or reverse the lower court means that the NSA loses as that is what the lower court decided.
You see, sometimes declining to hear is just a way of saying the outcome is so obvious and the lower courts already got it right so stop wasting our time.
Well, that is basically the only reason needed for regulation in Europe. Just keep in mind that they never really overthrew the king in most of Europe, they just kind of faded out to be replaced by elected, multi-headed kings.
... said the asshole who isn't working and living off of whatever the government has taken from those who do work to give to those who have chosen not to.
Slashdot Mirror
Just what a liberal would say. All hail caesar!!!!
You mean the 8 or so million dollars the feds paid Randy Weaver for the death of his wife because the feds were in the wrong.
Due, Bush has been out of office for 6 years now. I know things are moving fast but please do try to keep up.
Oh, we understand that others are reading but that doesn't mean we have to change our ways to cater to your desires because you came here so you change to the local customs. Why is it that if I visit your country you will complain if I complain about it not being like the US but then you expect us in the US to change to meet your local customs? Hypocrite much?
Your complaining is like me reading the Guardian online and complaining about all the misspellings.
because if you go farther east you end up on the West Coast of the US which, we have already discussed, is West. so simple.
but I think they did mean that it doesn't matter that they may have different attributes as long as they both receive the same reward regardless of effort exerted adn such. Otherwise, racism or sexism or lack of multi-culturalism.
Displaced coal-miners because of "dirty coal" has nothing to do with robotics and such. This seems to be an argument between to leftists about how best to help the "little people" they just screwed over.
Yes dbIII, those guys are leftists not libertarians, I knnow the first letter being the same is confusing and all. Or maybe you can show me how they are really just the Koch brothers in disguise.
Oh, like Obama wanting a stronger federal government that regulates nearly aspect of my life, doesn't allow the use of public lands for what they were originally intended for.
Okay, glad we are on the same page except I didn't realize the Koch brothers were such strong backers of Obama. I guess I'll have to dig way deeper. Thanks for the insight there.
When in reality, nobody is wanting to see any of the Koch family become any kind of King so a bit of education would be in order.
If you want a modern-day example of someone desiring to be a King, look no further than someone who has obtained an office and has publicly stated that he intends to make law by executive order if Congress will not make the laws he wants. That is much closer to being King than spending money, which, by the way, plenty of liberal/progressives do as well: Soros and Bloomberg are the two most well-known.
It is every bit as liberal as I think. I have simply chosen to not delude myself into thinking that liberal means "good for me."
Yes, it is stealing in the sense that "stealing" is synonymous with "theft" and the act of copying such things without permission has been defined as theft in many legal jurisdictions.
Just because you don't want it to be so don't make it be so.
stop using is pretty much how to conduct a boycott.
So it is actually not liberals/progressives who support Affirmative Action? I ask because Affirmative Action means exactly having different standards for different races, as in lower test scores and GPA for those races but higher for that race. Most people read having different standards for different races as discriminating based on race but as the previous poster said... Liberals don't actually see discrimination as discrimination, they see it as "action".
Are you really so confused about the definition of terms that you somehow find advocating for a dictator to be the same as libertarian. Actually study something and learn and be educated before you do any more damage to society.
try this one out. Not everyone uses the ER.
Would that be taxing me for breathing in? Some liberals and progressives have already demanded that the government regulate and tax what I breath out.
They also said that the 2nd amendment guaranteed the right of private citizen's to own and carry firearms. That good enough for you that you will demand that your politicians stop trying to pass laws contrary to that opinion?
Functional for a much different reason and definitely not new and non-obvious. I learned in my early mechanical design classes that nothing should have sharp edges because sharp edges are stress points and stress points lead to fractures and fractures are a problem. The stress points are as much (or more) of a problem for the molds than for the parts in some cases as well.
In other words, Apple engineers "discovered" what they were taught in engineering school and the patent office screwed up.
I call BS. We are talking FOSS here so there can be absolutely no security issue because it was produced by a large community of do-gooders who vetted all commits for us and this means that every bug gets caught within seconds of being committed.
It is a fact (not theory or guess) that only commercial, closed software has security flaws.
And yet they are 3 of the 5 that realized that Chris Matthews* is actually an employee of a corporation and that there is no actual way to distinguish his employer from a documentary film maker so they chose to allow Chris Matthews to continue to be employed by a corporation to do what he does and to let the documentary film maker also continue. However, you and Chris Matthews would be happier if all 9 had agreed that being employed by a corporation meant making no more politically oriented speech so that Chris Matthews would be unemployed.
*Please substitute your favorite reporter/media personality whatever that makes a living by being "the media."
Very telling about how much actual knowledge one needs to be a college professor, isn't it?
They only declined to expedite the case by having it skip the normal appeals process; they did not decline to hear it at all. And, as the case now stands, a decline to hear or reverse the lower court means that the NSA loses as that is what the lower court decided.
You see, sometimes declining to hear is just a way of saying the outcome is so obvious and the lower courts already got it right so stop wasting our time.
Charlie Daniels... use google
Well, that is basically the only reason needed for regulation in Europe. Just keep in mind that they never really overthrew the king in most of Europe, they just kind of faded out to be replaced by elected, multi-headed kings.
... said the asshole who isn't working and living off of whatever the government has taken from those who do work to give to those who have chosen not to.