Although it doesnt cause cancer, the radiation is nonetheless interacting with molecules (in this case causing thermal excitation of water) in your body.
It is not unreasonable to have an interaction with a radio wave perturb a molecule either thermally, magnetically, or otherwise, and result in a modification to some biological pathway. If that pathway has to do with healing of damaged DNA then you will very easily get cancer, despite the lack of ionizing radiation. I dont know the biology of the brain very well, but neither does anyone well enough to determine this for sure, or even ascribe the risk accurately.....this is why these tests are being done, and hopefully you are right, I just dont want to take that on faith.
heh, I did read that wrong. although the point is still valid.
if 37% of degrees are held by women, and all go into industry and 63% of the degrees are held by men, and none go into CS-industry, and instead all the people hired have no degree, then you end up with a higher percentage of women working with degrees than men.
so although I cant read, my statistics (I think) are fine.
I noticed the ones who said correlation was there (causes cancer) were from universities, whereas the other studies were international committees with no mentioned affiliation. I am pretty sure you are right on target.
less likely compared to what stat....what is only 1% of men had a CS degree.....also 37% of women is 37% of a larger group than those developing software, which is a small subset, so 100% in that subset might have degrees.
Unless you are leaving out some crucial information, or wording what you said very poorly.
The women got annoyed at all the men who were pimply and awkward, and so they "left in droves". But humanity has a short memory, so the next generation of women to go through this pain is coming.
quoting from wikipedia (and thus the true gospel):
"In the end stages of planet formation, a planet will have "cleared the neighbourhood" of its own orbital zone, meaning it has become gravitationally dominant, and there are no other bodies of comparable size other than its own satellites or those otherwise under its gravitational influence. A large body which meets the other criteria for a planet but has not cleared its neighbourhood is classified as a dwarf planet. This includes Pluto, which shares its orbital neighbourhood with Kuiper belt objects such as the plutinos. The IAU's definition does not attach specific numbers or equations to this term, but all the planets have cleared their neighbourhoods to a much greater extent than any dwarf planet, or any candidate for dwarf planet."
I bet it is a spy satellite placed by aliens to watch us from afar.....its also a good port to refuel when you want to go on a weekend anal-probing trip with the fam.
interesting post on the actual website that I thought I would re-post - can you create a similar technology that mimics a gill and would allow either underwater, or both under and above water breathing.
though the air/liquid exchange is still an important issue for both. might require carrying a battery powered pump
even if it doesn't detect every earthquake....if you could detect some of them with certainty that would be great!!
My question is whether you can determine the strength/magnitude range beforehand......there are so many quakes all over the world all the time....its only the 5's, 6's and up when people really care (maybe a 4 if its somewhere that doesn't normally get a quake)
yes, but fewer are making malware for XP, because of the lower usage and move to Vista & 7
so although the numbers are normalized, the obvious trend of people focusing on the more popular versions to infect is exactly what one would expect "as usage of XP decreases and Win7 increases"
I am completely against this, but they could just have cell tower X send info to anyone who is connected to it. Thus anonymity is mostly maintained and no information needs to be used that would normally require a warrant.
However, I doubt they will choose a method of delivery which minimizes the amount of information they get.
Slashdot Mirror
sorry, i thought people understood jokes
It is not unreasonable to have an interaction with a radio wave perturb a molecule either thermally, magnetically, or otherwise, and result in a modification to some biological pathway. If that pathway has to do with healing of damaged DNA then you will very easily get cancer, despite the lack of ionizing radiation. I dont know the biology of the brain very well, but neither does anyone well enough to determine this for sure, or even ascribe the risk accurately.....this is why these tests are being done, and hopefully you are right, I just dont want to take that on faith.
heh, I did read that wrong. although the point is still valid. if 37% of degrees are held by women, and all go into industry and 63% of the degrees are held by men, and none go into CS-industry, and instead all the people hired have no degree, then you end up with a higher percentage of women working with degrees than men. so although I cant read, my statistics (I think) are fine.
see, that is a much more convincing explanation as to why it wouldnt work.
mostly taste
depends on the animal
you should stick your head in a microwave while its on.....its non-ionizing....so totally safe
Oh, so its actually the infrastructure, and not the cell phone use itself?
I noticed the ones who said correlation was there (causes cancer) were from universities, whereas the other studies were international committees with no mentioned affiliation. I am pretty sure you are right on target.
This also applies to Fracking
less likely compared to what stat....what is only 1% of men had a CS degree.....also 37% of women is 37% of a larger group than those developing software, which is a small subset, so 100% in that subset might have degrees. Unless you are leaving out some crucial information, or wording what you said very poorly.
The women got annoyed at all the men who were pimply and awkward, and so they "left in droves". But humanity has a short memory, so the next generation of women to go through this pain is coming.
"In the end stages of planet formation, a planet will have "cleared the neighbourhood" of its own orbital zone, meaning it has become gravitationally dominant, and there are no other bodies of comparable size other than its own satellites or those otherwise under its gravitational influence. A large body which meets the other criteria for a planet but has not cleared its neighbourhood is classified as a dwarf planet. This includes Pluto, which shares its orbital neighbourhood with Kuiper belt objects such as the plutinos. The IAU's definition does not attach specific numbers or equations to this term, but all the planets have cleared their neighbourhoods to a much greater extent than any dwarf planet, or any candidate for dwarf planet."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_the_neighbourhood
if you can mimic a human lung with a grid of micro-channels, why cant you mimic the design of a fishes gills and breathing apparatuses?
I bet it is a spy satellite placed by aliens to watch us from afar.....its also a good port to refuel when you want to go on a weekend anal-probing trip with the fam.
yes, and only 2 are STABLE minima, the other 3 are unstable maxima
like your mom's coochie
no because its tiny...the other object needs to be comparable in size, like was the case with pluto and the plutoids (of nearly the same size)
interesting post on the actual website that I thought I would re-post - can you create a similar technology that mimics a gill and would allow either underwater, or both under and above water breathing. though the air/liquid exchange is still an important issue for both. might require carrying a battery powered pump
yes, because no one used the hotel name at end of sentence in the review...it was a bad example
I disagree, how do you think I ended up with this rowing machine?
guilty until proven innocent
My question is whether you can determine the strength/magnitude range beforehand......there are so many quakes all over the world all the time....its only the 5's, 6's and up when people really care (maybe a 4 if its somewhere that doesn't normally get a quake)
yes, but fewer are making malware for XP, because of the lower usage and move to Vista & 7 so although the numbers are normalized, the obvious trend of people focusing on the more popular versions to infect is exactly what one would expect "as usage of XP decreases and Win7 increases"
However, I doubt they will choose a method of delivery which minimizes the amount of information they get.
Thats ridiculous....who said that? I love fish.