That's a list of what I usually need when I setup a new Linux PC. Sure, I gradually add more stuff, but that, alone, should be more than enough and there are obviously things to remove from that list in many situations.
You know that you can have a POSIX subsystem in the Windows architecture, right? I'm no fan of how Windows is made, but I see a place in the world for this wonderful project. A FLOSS reimplementation of something is always well-received.
My opinion is as valid as yours ( I assume you've used both too, and that you don't have prejudice against any of them). I'm not saying I'm right, I'm saying I feel that GitHub is far superior -- for my needs.
Some versions of bumblebee work here. Right now I run my own modified version and am actually scared of trying to update it. However, I have no UEFI startup manager. I am actually glad, because the thought of UEFI makes me want to puke.
Exactly. Skype uses an interface, it shouldn't adapt to webcams -- that paart of the implementation. As far as I know, most webcams out there are also supported implementation-side. What *could* happen is a misuse of the interface by Skype. For the record, I never had issues with my 4 webcams in skype, though I really don't videochat that much.
I had around 7 different AMD/ATI cards on 7 different machines. All of them turned to crap. Chose NVIDIA -- have had 9 of those and none has had problems.
Not only awesome, but I think a requirement. How can you judge about what you know nothing about in a timespan not appropriate for you to learn about it, or without the ability to learn it?
openbox fpbanel gmrun pcmanfm chromium mpd ario qtcreator gedit guake gnome-terminal parcellite nm-applet xcompmgr/cairo-compmgr evince file-roller libreoffice gimp gqview claws-mail
That's a list of what I usually need when I setup a new Linux PC. Sure, I gradually add more stuff, but that, alone, should be more than enough and there are obviously things to remove from that list in many situations.
You know that you can have a POSIX subsystem in the Windows architecture, right? I'm no fan of how Windows is made, but I see a place in the world for this wonderful project. A FLOSS reimplementation of something is always well-received.
Shh, you'll insult him.
When I talk about Free I talk about being able to dive in the kernel to find backdoors. BANG.
Yup, C++ too. They couldn't make it out of thin air -- now everybody wants a bit of success.
Exactly.
Wine was originally WINdows Emulator, but they changed it for at least two obvious reasons.
Because, sometimes, you want to get out of bounds! Seriously, though, it's because it's not that simple, maintaining the good o'l efficiency.
Yes, at university, a great professor showed us this video.
My opinion is as valid as yours ( I assume you've used both too, and that you don't have prejudice against any of them). I'm not saying I'm right, I'm saying I feel that GitHub is far superior -- for my needs.
I personally feel that it is.
I actually do feel that GitHub is far superior. And I mean faaaaaaaar.
Some versions of bumblebee work here. Right now I run my own modified version and am actually scared of trying to update it. However, I have no UEFI startup manager. I am actually glad, because the thought of UEFI makes me want to puke.
That's all I really want to know.
You just made my day.
Exactly. I, for one, as an occasional skype-to-skype user, very much plan to stay with my version -- It just works.
Exactly. Skype uses an interface, it shouldn't adapt to webcams -- that paart of the implementation. As far as I know, most webcams out there are also supported implementation-side. What *could* happen is a misuse of the interface by Skype. For the record, I never had issues with my 4 webcams in skype, though I really don't videochat that much.
And I got so puzzled that I wrote "not see hear" as a monkey myself.
Yes, I found it odd not see hear about masturbating monkeys.
True.
Blow.....up?
I had around 7 different AMD/ATI cards on 7 different machines. All of them turned to crap. Chose NVIDIA -- have had 9 of those and none has had problems.
Not only awesome, but I think a requirement. How can you judge about what you know nothing about in a timespan not appropriate for you to learn about it, or without the ability to learn it?
Of course, and I didn't say that what you're saying wasn't true! This would, of course, have been massive, you are absolutely (and knowingly) right.
Of course. This seemed like the logical thing to do, though. Copyrighting APIs? Crazy, IMO!