Even when there may exist such a distro, go search it yourself. Otherwise look at the suggestions here, and recognize you need to pick the best one, even when it does not have all of your points. Or pay someone to build such a thing. Or do it yourself.
Last time i looked at the LMDE livecd, it was not quite as usable as Mint. But i definitly do not want something with ubuntu base. They fuck with their packages (see Gtk), and every fork will suffer from it, too.
He is telling us features of systemd, and if upstart supports them, too. He omits some strenghts of upstart, as he just wants to show his software is superior.
systemd is hard to use. If a service fails, you get cryptic instructions (ie. use journalctl -xn, while its not described what -xn means, and its a log snippet in less, which is much less useful than just a/var/log/syslog), and the utilities do even try to provide a legacy/etc/init.d interface. systemctl vs. journalctl vs. systemd is not so clear, if you do not read a lot of docs, too. upstart on the other hand seems quite simple, and has very simple but flexible init"scripts".
Maybe. But KDE 4.0 was total crap, too. But it had a nice new foundation, and big ideas. with 4.2 they were usable again, with 4.4 they started taking real adavantage of their new frameworks.
akonadi and nepomuk are still both PITA despite having great concepts, but the rest works like a charm. So, doing something new is not the problem. Doing something wrong, is the problem.
Works stable out of the box, printer was usable without even configuring it (i wanted to add it, just to see that its already a registerted printer), everything works. Nice stable versions, with a new release "when it's ready", which does not need to "wait for.1 of it for a stable version".
SysV-init still runs nice on Debian, and they will continue to use Xorg/Wayland.
So, seems a good choice for DAUs, and for experts, too.
they cannot forbid the extension (development). But they can forbid users to use it. The users agreed the TOS. So they can cancel their accounts, if the users use this extension. Of course, losing a lot of users will hurt them more, than losing one developer. But they could spread some FUD about doing so, and this would prevent the use of the extension.
But there also is no way to know, if the coin exists, if the blockchain isn't propagated anymore. So maybe its a bad idea to keep it under your mattress. Or its a bad idea to mine, when you must assume there are coins under the matress... because i guess the older blockchain wins, when the coins are reactivated.
a coin is defined by its blockchain, which proves, that the coin is the first mined version of this coin. Doublespending IS possible, as long as the other coin is inactive long enough, and the other person does not know about it. And if they network remembers each coin mined, even if its not sure it ever existed, it could be spammed with fake-coins. they could not be spent, but they could pollute the network.
It is not fixed. When these Bitcoins are lost forever, they can be mined again. The amount is only fixed, when there is no loss of existing BTC. Or the other way round: the amount of existing BTC is fixed, not of mining BTC. So if there is a loss, there is a chance to mine again.
Slashdot Mirror
the problem with your analogy: It was actually a working recipe. Maybe written with a bit of humor, but with tasty results.
okay, there are facebook comments and g+ comments, too.
Why are sites to stupid to use an own comment system? There are many ready-to-use systems.
https://github.com/django/django-contrib-comments/
bsd is unix, linux is applied unix.
nope, this doesn't help.
But what helps: get a powered hup. The HOST-Connector powers the rPi (really cool), and the CLIENT-Ports power your usb-devices.
MUST
1) eliminating choice is bad
2) Unity is not "de facto". It is only supported by Ubuntu. If you want something widely used, try KDE.
Go use ubuntu and shut up.
Even when there may exist such a distro, go search it yourself. Otherwise look at the suggestions here, and recognize you need to pick the best one, even when it does not have all of your points. Or pay someone to build such a thing. Or do it yourself.
if you really want ubuntu based, try Trisquel. It runs really fine. I am still waiting, if they switch to a Debian base.
Last time i looked at the LMDE livecd, it was not quite as usable as Mint. But i definitly do not want something with ubuntu base. They fuck with their packages (see Gtk), and every fork will suffer from it, too.
for LTS people.
Try something like fedora if you like 6 month releases.
maybe, they want to know, that you move the cursor out of the ad, to watch the animation displayed?
He is telling us features of systemd, and if upstart supports them, too. He omits some strenghts of upstart, as he just wants to show his software is superior.
systemd is hard to use. If a service fails, you get cryptic instructions (ie. use journalctl -xn, while its not described what -xn means, and its a log snippet in less, which is much less useful than just a /var/log/syslog), and the utilities do even try to provide a legacy /etc/init.d interface. systemctl vs. journalctl vs. systemd is not so clear, if you do not read a lot of docs, too. upstart on the other hand seems quite simple, and has very simple but flexible init"scripts".
WTF, Slashdot? Why are you censoring the quote?
Its a german personal pronoun.
Maybe. But KDE 4.0 was total crap, too. But it had a nice new foundation, and big ideas. with 4.2 they were usable again, with 4.4 they started taking real adavantage of their new frameworks.
akonadi and nepomuk are still both PITA despite having great concepts, but the rest works like a charm. So, doing something new is not the problem. Doing something wrong, is the problem.
Debian.
Works stable out of the box, printer was usable without even configuring it (i wanted to add it, just to see that its already a registerted printer), everything works. Nice stable versions, with a new release "when it's ready", which does not need to "wait for .1 of it for a stable version".
SysV-init still runs nice on Debian, and they will continue to use Xorg/Wayland.
So, seems a good choice for DAUs, and for experts, too.
1) Naming things
2) Cache invalidation
3) off by one errors
Betteridge finally proven wrong?
they cannot forbid the extension (development).
But they can forbid users to use it. The users agreed the TOS. So they can cancel their accounts, if the users use this extension. Of course, losing a lot of users will hurt them more, than losing one developer. But they could spread some FUD about doing so, and this would prevent the use of the extension.
i think you're not getting his point.
1) Find target.
2) Note serial
3) Register Bike online
4) Wait
5) Steal Bike, claim its yours
6) ???
7) PROFIT!
But there also is no way to know, if the coin exists, if the blockchain isn't propagated anymore. So maybe its a bad idea to keep it under your mattress. Or its a bad idea to mine, when you must assume there are coins under the matress ... because i guess the older blockchain wins, when the coins are reactivated.
a coin is defined by its blockchain, which proves, that the coin is the first mined version of this coin. Doublespending IS possible, as long as the other coin is inactive long enough, and the other person does not know about it. And if they network remembers each coin mined, even if its not sure it ever existed, it could be spammed with fake-coins. they could not be spent, but they could pollute the network.
It is not fixed. When these Bitcoins are lost forever, they can be mined again. The amount is only fixed, when there is no loss of existing BTC. Or the other way round: the amount of existing BTC is fixed, not of mining BTC. So if there is a loss, there is a chance to mine again.