I know that the Blackberry 950 came with an embedded 80386 processor. But heck, the last 80386 based board I replaced with another 80386 board was just six month ago - and no, this was not a Blackberry repair. It runs -- oh the horror -- RMX and a variant of SCO Unix.
For some reasons completely ununderstandable, Germany managed to a) switch off all nuclear plants, b) didn't increase carbon output and c) is a net exporter of eletricity.
Seems as if the search for the single technology to solve all our energy problems is the wrong way to think about it.
If someone argues nuclear would be the only technology to fight AGW, then it is more likely that they believe in AGW only as a vehicle to further their nuclear agenda.
See? Works in the other direction too.
... has a large network of phone switches and attached applications, of which the first ones were build in the late 1980ies, the newest application running on it is a call center application from 2009.
The system has a central management console which allows seamless administration of subscriber lines across all 30 phone switches in the system.
Every dollar 'given' as stimulus has been taken from other people, either directly through taxes, or by devaluation of capital through inflation.
That capital is thus no longer available to its original (proper) owners, and so cannot be invested by them. The only remaining question is whether the government is more careful with how it invests other people's money than they are themselves.
Every dollar 'given' as a stimulus to keep up the law has been taken from other people, either directly through taxes, or by devaluation of capital through inflation. That capital is thus no longer available to its original (proper) owners, and so cannot be invested by them. The only remaining question is whether the government is more careful with how it protects other people than they are themselves.
You see? With the same hogwash argument you could argue that we should abolish all police, judges and the army, and let people decide how they protect themselves. Some will invest in a private army of their own, other will just keep some bodyguards, other will bound together and form some corporation with group of leaders which then organise the protection of their members. We should also encourage competition by having at least two local providers of security where you can pay your protection money to.
And suddenly we are inmidst of tribal warfare, with local warlords feuding each other for territory -- pardon: marketshare. Local businesses will bloom marketing services to the local private armies. Lets call those businesses thus "marketenders".
But we had a big historical experiment: Which countries did thrive? Those whose libertarian society gave large tax breaks to the wealthy, even extempting the most wealthy from all taxes, gave the protection business into private hands as fiefdoms, and encouraged everyone to found their own territory, unregulated, with their own standards? And then let the war -- pardon, the market -- decide whose country -- pardon, business -- will survive and conquer -- pardon, buy -- the others?
Or those, who had a strong government with an efficient administration, setting general laws everyone had to comply with, a good state education system open to everyone, a well organised army and police force and a system of judges and courts paid enough to decide fair and according to the law?
You are right, there are features a deskphone (in what incarnation ever) provides which no mobile could.
Most important are group functions (group pick-up, directed pick-up, hunting groups), but key lines and company phonebook are also very useful features no mobile provides, and so are call overflows.
It might look not so important if you are mainly working alone, and only use the phone to place calls or get calls intended solely for you. But if you are working in a larger group, those features come in handy. And yes, desk phone mobility where you can get your phone configuration and all calls on any deskphone in the company is a very useful feature - and still a desk phone feature, not possible with a mobile.
On the other hand, I don't make much of a difference between a software phone on your computer or a hardware deskphone from a technical point of view. Today's phone switches allow both hardware phones or software phones to plug into the system without a reconfiguration of the phone switch. From a personal point of view I don't like the softphones, because you have to always wear those headsets, and whenever you leave your desk, you have to take them off, and if you return, you have to put them on again. A colleague of mine has an USB-deskphone, which plugs into his computer and uses the softphone config to get a line, which is a nice solution. Deskphones often offer hands free calling via loudspeaker and microphone, which allows you continue work like with a headset without the headset hassle, so the advantage of the headset is no longer there.
But it works. Strangely.
Obviously we have a serious case of Yogi Berra here: in theory, practice and theory are the same, in practice, they aren't.
So in theory, those gun controlling laws give criminals the ability to own guns, but not normal people.
In practice, in those countries, criminals don't own many guns, and they nearly never use them to commit crimes.
So lets call "reptil" and "fish" more or less a morphological type, not so much a classification, the same as "lizard" is not a classification, more a description of a certain habit, as there are lizards in different groups (archosaurs, lepidosaurs, anapsides), which also contain non lizard forms (birds, snakes, turtles). Thus we still have mammals and birds as animals with reptile ancestors, and all of them together with fish ancestors.
Still, this does not help in determining, if Nyasasaurus is a dinosaur or not.
You are missing situations where for instance config files are stored separately. I have the situation where I are going on a customer site to replace defective network gear, and I get the config files to upload them into the gear before replacing them.
For security reasons, I don't get the configured console password, if I made an error, I would have to empty the config via recovery and start anew. I just replace the gear, phone the network guy of the customer and he then checks connectivity. It wouldn't help to modify the config before uploading to an empty password, because part of the configuration is the connection to an AAA server which kicks in as soon as the network connectivity is there, and then it closes all open consoles and locking me out.
But if I could brute force the shared keys whose hashes are in the config files, I might still get in.
Upon reading a little about those groups, I noticed that molecular analysis does suggest that even though turtles have no additional holes in their skulls (which would morphologically put them into the anapsid group), it seems that they are closer related to some diapsid groups, especially lepidosauridae (lizards, snakes etc.pp.). So the point in time when the last common ancestor of turtles and other reptiles lived, is still debated.
So the question for this reconstructed animal is not so much if it fits a morphological definition of a dinosaur, but rather if the last common ancestor of this animal and a bird was living later than the last common ancestor of birds and crocodiles. If yes, then it would put it definitely into dinosaur territory, being either an early dinosaur or a member of one of the sister groups of early dinosaurs. If no, it might still be an archosaur, closer related to recent birds and crocodiles than to other lizards and snakes.
"Reptiles" is a paraphyletic group, and is no longer used. The classification "reptile" has some serious problems, as for instance turtles branched early from the other reptiles, later the mammal-like reptiles, and then the other branches of reptiles radiated. So reptiles would cover a very incomplete tree where one early branch is missing (mammals) and one very late one (birds).
Instead we are talking "amniotes", meaning animals whose early development involves the growing of an amnios, a pouch in which the embryo develops. The amniotes then branch into Anapsides (including turtles), Synapsides (mammals and their predecessors) and Diapsides (all other reptile-like animals including the birds).
But why did he just insert old bones and crystals that take billions of years to form like the zirkonia?
Couldn't he just plant, lets say, a rubber boot somewhere into appearently 400 million old rock? (Sorry, Terry Pratchett!)
There is no NSU anymore in Volkswagen. None of their car lines survived after 1977. The only car that ever was build with a different badge was the NSU/VW K70, which can be seen as an inspirational predecessor to the VW Passat line, but none of the car parts were ever used somewhere else. Even the engine (a normal 4cyl, not a Wankel), based on the NSU-1200 design, was replaced with the EA827.
No. According to the WHO, health is defined as a "state of all-embracing physical, mental and social well-being". If someone with Asperger's syndrome is living happily, has no illness hampering him, and is embedded in a sound social fabric, he is healthy.
Nowhere in the definition there is a mention of "normality".
The problem arised when Samsung found out that the foreman of the jury did not answer truthfully, when asked if he was ever involved in a civil lawsuit. So Samsung filed a motion pointing out that problem, and Apple opposed the motion saying: "You should have known." To which Samsung replied: "So when did you know?".
As the lawsuit in question was about two decades ago, it wasn't easy to find (and only the former foreman's interviews and some happy circumstances helped to dig out the lawsuit in question), and Apple had to admit that they didn't know either, so their motion is moot, as Samsung could possibly not have known either.
Not plenty, compared with other colonial empires, but that's beside the point. Germany lost all its colonies in 1918, so for nearly a century now, Germany doesn't have any colonies at all, which really influences the attitude to colonies in general.
Leftwing Anarchists? Gavrilo Princip was trying to become a chetnik, and because he was refused for being too weak, he tried to prove himself worthwile by staging a re-enactmend of the assassination attempt against the austrian viceregent of Bosnia, Marijan Varesanin by fellow countryman Bogdan Zerajic.
Chetniks were nationalist and monarchist militias in the tradition of the Hajduks, and in the Balkan Wars in 1912 and 1913, they were fighting as irregular troups against the Osmans and laid the foundation for the Kingdom of Serbia. I don't know how that fits to a "leftwing anarchist", but maybe you can enlight me.
And I really don't know how you fit the German Nationalsocialists with the leftwing anarchists. I really don't have a clue.
Slashdot Mirror
They are. For instance, in Germany, 911 is the area code for Nuremberg.
I know that the Blackberry 950 came with an embedded 80386 processor. But heck, the last 80386 based board I replaced with another 80386 board was just six month ago - and no, this was not a Blackberry repair. It runs -- oh the horror -- RMX and a variant of SCO Unix.
The last original 80386 from Intel was made in 2007.
Not so fully bearded embedded technician: Not everything that runs Linux is a general-purpose computer.
For some reasons completely ununderstandable, Germany managed to a) switch off all nuclear plants, b) didn't increase carbon output and c) is a net exporter of eletricity.
Seems as if the search for the single technology to solve all our energy problems is the wrong way to think about it.
If someone argues nuclear would be the only technology to fight AGW, then it is more likely that they believe in AGW only as a vehicle to further their nuclear agenda. See? Works in the other direction too.
... has a large network of phone switches and attached applications, of which the first ones were build in the late 1980ies, the newest application running on it is a call center application from 2009. The system has a central management console which allows seamless administration of subscriber lines across all 30 phone switches in the system.
Every dollar 'given' as stimulus has been taken from other people, either directly through taxes, or by devaluation of capital through inflation.
That capital is thus no longer available to its original (proper) owners, and so cannot be invested by them. The only remaining question is whether the government is more careful with how it invests other people's money than they are themselves.
Every dollar 'given' as a stimulus to keep up the law has been taken from other people, either directly through taxes, or by devaluation of capital through inflation. That capital is thus no longer available to its original (proper) owners, and so cannot be invested by them. The only remaining question is whether the government is more careful with how it protects other people than they are themselves.
You see? With the same hogwash argument you could argue that we should abolish all police, judges and the army, and let people decide how they protect themselves. Some will invest in a private army of their own, other will just keep some bodyguards, other will bound together and form some corporation with group of leaders which then organise the protection of their members. We should also encourage competition by having at least two local providers of security where you can pay your protection money to.
And suddenly we are inmidst of tribal warfare, with local warlords feuding each other for territory -- pardon: marketshare. Local businesses will bloom marketing services to the local private armies. Lets call those businesses thus "marketenders".
But we had a big historical experiment: Which countries did thrive? Those whose libertarian society gave large tax breaks to the wealthy, even extempting the most wealthy from all taxes, gave the protection business into private hands as fiefdoms, and encouraged everyone to found their own territory, unregulated, with their own standards? And then let the war -- pardon, the market -- decide whose country -- pardon, business -- will survive and conquer -- pardon, buy -- the others? Or those, who had a strong government with an efficient administration, setting general laws everyone had to comply with, a good state education system open to everyone, a well organised army and police force and a system of judges and courts paid enough to decide fair and according to the law?
You are right, there are features a deskphone (in what incarnation ever) provides which no mobile could. Most important are group functions (group pick-up, directed pick-up, hunting groups), but key lines and company phonebook are also very useful features no mobile provides, and so are call overflows.
It might look not so important if you are mainly working alone, and only use the phone to place calls or get calls intended solely for you. But if you are working in a larger group, those features come in handy. And yes, desk phone mobility where you can get your phone configuration and all calls on any deskphone in the company is a very useful feature - and still a desk phone feature, not possible with a mobile.
On the other hand, I don't make much of a difference between a software phone on your computer or a hardware deskphone from a technical point of view. Today's phone switches allow both hardware phones or software phones to plug into the system without a reconfiguration of the phone switch. From a personal point of view I don't like the softphones, because you have to always wear those headsets, and whenever you leave your desk, you have to take them off, and if you return, you have to put them on again. A colleague of mine has an USB-deskphone, which plugs into his computer and uses the softphone config to get a line, which is a nice solution. Deskphones often offer hands free calling via loudspeaker and microphone, which allows you continue work like with a headset without the headset hassle, so the advantage of the headset is no longer there.
Then your local phone admin had set them to strong compression and is not deploying QoS correctly.
They came available. I am deploying them. Not very often (they are expensive!), but there you go.
But it works. Strangely. Obviously we have a serious case of Yogi Berra here: in theory, practice and theory are the same, in practice, they aren't. So in theory, those gun controlling laws give criminals the ability to own guns, but not normal people. In practice, in those countries, criminals don't own many guns, and they nearly never use them to commit crimes.
So lets call "reptil" and "fish" more or less a morphological type, not so much a classification, the same as "lizard" is not a classification, more a description of a certain habit, as there are lizards in different groups (archosaurs, lepidosaurs, anapsides), which also contain non lizard forms (birds, snakes, turtles). Thus we still have mammals and birds as animals with reptile ancestors, and all of them together with fish ancestors. Still, this does not help in determining, if Nyasasaurus is a dinosaur or not.
You are missing situations where for instance config files are stored separately. I have the situation where I are going on a customer site to replace defective network gear, and I get the config files to upload them into the gear before replacing them. For security reasons, I don't get the configured console password, if I made an error, I would have to empty the config via recovery and start anew. I just replace the gear, phone the network guy of the customer and he then checks connectivity. It wouldn't help to modify the config before uploading to an empty password, because part of the configuration is the connection to an AAA server which kicks in as soon as the network connectivity is there, and then it closes all open consoles and locking me out. But if I could brute force the shared keys whose hashes are in the config files, I might still get in.
Upon reading a little about those groups, I noticed that molecular analysis does suggest that even though turtles have no additional holes in their skulls (which would morphologically put them into the anapsid group), it seems that they are closer related to some diapsid groups, especially lepidosauridae (lizards, snakes etc.pp.). So the point in time when the last common ancestor of turtles and other reptiles lived, is still debated.
So the question for this reconstructed animal is not so much if it fits a morphological definition of a dinosaur, but rather if the last common ancestor of this animal and a bird was living later than the last common ancestor of birds and crocodiles. If yes, then it would put it definitely into dinosaur territory, being either an early dinosaur or a member of one of the sister groups of early dinosaurs. If no, it might still be an archosaur, closer related to recent birds and crocodiles than to other lizards and snakes.
"Reptiles" is a paraphyletic group, and is no longer used. The classification "reptile" has some serious problems, as for instance turtles branched early from the other reptiles, later the mammal-like reptiles, and then the other branches of reptiles radiated. So reptiles would cover a very incomplete tree where one early branch is missing (mammals) and one very late one (birds). Instead we are talking "amniotes", meaning animals whose early development involves the growing of an amnios, a pouch in which the embryo develops. The amniotes then branch into Anapsides (including turtles), Synapsides (mammals and their predecessors) and Diapsides (all other reptile-like animals including the birds).
But why did he just insert old bones and crystals that take billions of years to form like the zirkonia? Couldn't he just plant, lets say, a rubber boot somewhere into appearently 400 million old rock? (Sorry, Terry Pratchett!)
There is no NSU anymore in Volkswagen. None of their car lines survived after 1977. The only car that ever was build with a different badge was the NSU/VW K70, which can be seen as an inspirational predecessor to the VW Passat line, but none of the car parts were ever used somewhere else. Even the engine (a normal 4cyl, not a Wankel), based on the NSU-1200 design, was replaced with the EA827.
A spherical Aspie in a vacuum without relatives and aquintances, yes.
No. According to the WHO, health is defined as a "state of all-embracing physical, mental and social well-being". If someone with Asperger's syndrome is living happily, has no illness hampering him, and is embedded in a sound social fabric, he is healthy. Nowhere in the definition there is a mention of "normality".
The problem arised when Samsung found out that the foreman of the jury did not answer truthfully, when asked if he was ever involved in a civil lawsuit. So Samsung filed a motion pointing out that problem, and Apple opposed the motion saying: "You should have known." To which Samsung replied: "So when did you know?". As the lawsuit in question was about two decades ago, it wasn't easy to find (and only the former foreman's interviews and some happy circumstances helped to dig out the lawsuit in question), and Apple had to admit that they didn't know either, so their motion is moot, as Samsung could possibly not have known either.
No. This would make it a solvable maze. So it's just a maze, or "a puzzle consisting of a complicated network of paths or passages".
Not plenty, compared with other colonial empires, but that's beside the point. Germany lost all its colonies in 1918, so for nearly a century now, Germany doesn't have any colonies at all, which really influences the attitude to colonies in general.
Leftwing Anarchists? Gavrilo Princip was trying to become a chetnik, and because he was refused for being too weak, he tried to prove himself worthwile by staging a re-enactmend of the assassination attempt against the austrian viceregent of Bosnia, Marijan Varesanin by fellow countryman Bogdan Zerajic. Chetniks were nationalist and monarchist militias in the tradition of the Hajduks, and in the Balkan Wars in 1912 and 1913, they were fighting as irregular troups against the Osmans and laid the foundation for the Kingdom of Serbia. I don't know how that fits to a "leftwing anarchist", but maybe you can enlight me. And I really don't know how you fit the German Nationalsocialists with the leftwing anarchists. I really don't have a clue.
No. It doesn't.