I do dev on both Windows and Mac, across multiple versions of each. The early versions of what I have to deal with can easily trash a system. On Windows, I have one box, problems happen, I click "revert", done. Win 2K, XP, Vista are all a click away.
On the other hand, I have a pile of Macs, (ppc/intel/10.4/10.5). I'd like more (ones without dev tools, more patch variations, more installed app variations), but it's not feasible without more Macs and more bootable drives. Being able to run OS X in a VM without any hacks that change the environment would be a huge help.
You don't need special privileges to debug your programs unless they're running under a different user account. You had that many people debugging services?
suggest. I said quite clearly, "It's NOT FAIR". That is not a vague statement. It means that Corporation A has an unfair advantage over Corporation B.
So no, Corporation A instead of not being taxed has to worry about taxes in thousands of tax zones (which is where this is going) instead of the one Corporation B has to worry about. How is this fair?
Many games don't even make it to the next windows release.
And a lot of the time, that's no fault of the game, but rather of the copy protection. I have games that won't run on XP, but crack them, and then they work fine there.
Now, you can argue all day as to whether Macs don't get viruses because they're inherently better designed or because the market is too small, but the one thing you can't argue with is that there has not been one single self-replicating in-the-wild virus for Mac OS X in the (checks Wikipedia) seven years it has been out. Not one. Ever. Period. *
Self replicating doesn't matter much. Some of the fastest spreading infections on Windows require user intervention.
Probably won't cut it, and if it does, there's some psychiatrists that are going to be out a job.
He's had two evaluations, and supposedly passed both of them. One was recent, and after the first one, he claimed to be the only certified sane lawyer in Florida.
I know, but by Eldred, it's supposed to stop sometime (yeah, right). Even then, how is something that's longer than people's lives considered, by any view, limited?
Slashdot Mirror
VMWare.
I do dev on both Windows and Mac, across multiple versions of each. The early versions of what I have to deal with can easily trash a system. On Windows, I have one box, problems happen, I click "revert", done. Win 2K, XP, Vista are all a click away.
On the other hand, I have a pile of Macs, (ppc/intel/10.4/10.5). I'd like more (ones without dev tools, more patch variations, more installed app variations), but it's not feasible without more Macs and more bootable drives. Being able to run OS X in a VM without any hacks that change the environment would be a huge help.
When did it get the filesystem? I thought that was one of the things that was dropped.
All the Windows clients here use Pidgin for their IM, and it's one of the clients recommended by IT for the internal IM server.
Then those developers lied. It's not needed at all for regular debugging. You already have full control over your own processes.
You don't need special privileges to debug your programs unless they're running under a different user account. You had that many people debugging services?
things like registering COM interfaces just can't be done unless you are an admin.
Nope, wrong.
HKCU\Software\Classes\ works just fine (at least in XP, don't know about Vista)
Projects in general, I agree. If some particular project is not GPL compatible, so what. You can deal with it, work around the issue.
Hardware on the other hand, not so much. What's needed to develop on hardware should be license agnostic.
I've gotten almost no spam from hotmail. Hotmail addresses aplenty, but not through hotmail.
RTFQ
ELDORADO, Texas (AP)
suggest. I said quite clearly, "It's NOT FAIR". That is not a vague statement. It means that Corporation A has an unfair advantage over Corporation B.
So no, Corporation A instead of not being taxed has to worry about taxes in thousands of tax zones (which is where this is going) instead of the one Corporation B has to worry about. How is this fair?
There is NO DECENT FILTER for snail spam.
yes, there is. Form 1500.
Many games don't even make it to the next windows release.
And a lot of the time, that's no fault of the game, but rather of the copy protection. I have games that won't run on XP, but crack them, and then they work fine there.
And most of the problems in Windows are from Trojans, not viruses. Users are stupid.
Here you go
An archive format that has had root holes exploited simply by opening. Mount it, and it's too late for the AV.
And all are defeated by "don't click financial links in an e-mail". No need to check the links, just don't do it, period.
Then I assume you don't have a problem with IE doing the same, since it's embeddable in any app?
Now, you can argue all day as to whether Macs don't get viruses because they're inherently better designed or because the market is too small, but the one thing you can't argue with is that there has not been one single self-replicating in-the-wild virus for Mac OS X in the (checks Wikipedia) seven years it has been out. Not one. Ever. Period. *
Self replicating doesn't matter much. Some of the fastest spreading infections on Windows require user intervention.
Probably won't cut it, and if it does, there's some psychiatrists that are going to be out a job.
He's had two evaluations, and supposedly passed both of them. One was recent, and after the first one, he claimed to be the only certified sane lawyer in Florida.
Possibly infected, possibly not. That's one of the tricks to get around spam filters.
Source
OK, so 135 mg would go to approximately 13 mg of formaldehyde, assuming all the methyl esters were metabolized
.026% more than the body produces under normal conditions in one day. So, I would say, yes, we're evolved to handle it.
So, that is lesse here...
A whopping
And for aspartame you only need to know that it metabolizes to formaldehyde to know enough.
And vitamin B12 metabolizes to free cyanide. Therefore, I assume you will stop ingesting food with it?
I know, but by Eldred, it's supposed to stop sometime (yeah, right). Even then, how is something that's longer than people's lives considered, by any view, limited?
Let's for the moment assume extensions are done and over with.
I have a child, today, and a movie is released, today. She will likely be dead before the copyright expires. How is that limited?