"free pass to anyone who claims they're attempting to block unlawful content, even when doing so in such a way that they interfere with lawful activities"
Like censorship groups that demand the shutdown and/or monitoring of all porn sites to prevent child pornography, or the creation of the Patriot Act "to catch terrorists" that has been used to jail non-terrorists, or double digit IQ TSA assholes making people take off their shoes "for our safety".
"But school officials are defending the sentence, saying the school was abiding by a state guideline that banned 'minimal nutrition' foods"
Minimal nutritious foods? Lets take a look at school lunches shall we? Greasy processed food-like pizza, wilted salad drowned in ranch dressing, a fruit cup swimming in high-fructose corn syrup, chocolate milk, french fries (they are a potato and count as a vegetable), and then some sort of dessert.
How about we send the people who came up with that menu to detention for 10 days.
There are plenty of archaic and unconstitutional laws still on the books; written and passed in some vain sort of attempt to change people. Look at any of the states that still have Drug Tax Stamps despite the very obvious evidence presented in Leary v. The United States.
Mostly these laws are passed, I guess, to add one more charge to some unlucky schmuck to keep them away from "good" society longer. There is a larger problem here that needs to be addressed by better persons than myself.
Kansas thought about it. Failure to buy your tax stamps means that they can bust you for tax evasion also. Too bad it is unconstitutional as was proven in Leary v The United States when court decided unanimously that the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 was in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Well I guess they could. They could go down to SC and register and then, when the government tried to bust them for being subversives point out that having a law that requires you to testify against yourself is in violation of the Fifth Amendment much like Tim Leary did when this country passed the Marihuana Tax Act
I mean, making the government and law makers look like a bunch of uneducated douches is kinda subversive act.
This is mostly likely unconstitutional. In Leary v The United States The Marihuana Tax Act (yes that is the "correct" spelling) was found to be in violation of the Fifth Amendment. I wish I could fire the people who come up with this stuff. It's like they don't even both to think. "Dur Hur, Lets make it illegal not to tell us you're a potential criminal." It scares me that we put these people in power.
Slashdot Mirror
So you create a magnetic field perpendicular to a coil and it induces a current which charges a battery. Wasn't Tesla doing that like 70 years ago?
Can we write software then to set our packets to the highest priority and just defeat their regulation by doing so?
"free pass to anyone who claims they're attempting to block unlawful content, even when doing so in such a way that they interfere with lawful activities" Like censorship groups that demand the shutdown and/or monitoring of all porn sites to prevent child pornography, or the creation of the Patriot Act "to catch terrorists" that has been used to jail non-terrorists, or double digit IQ TSA assholes making people take off their shoes "for our safety".
"But school officials are defending the sentence, saying the school was abiding by a state guideline that banned 'minimal nutrition' foods" Minimal nutritious foods? Lets take a look at school lunches shall we? Greasy processed food-like pizza, wilted salad drowned in ranch dressing, a fruit cup swimming in high-fructose corn syrup, chocolate milk, french fries (they are a potato and count as a vegetable), and then some sort of dessert. How about we send the people who came up with that menu to detention for 10 days.
There are plenty of archaic and unconstitutional laws still on the books; written and passed in some vain sort of attempt to change people. Look at any of the states that still have Drug Tax Stamps despite the very obvious evidence presented in Leary v. The United States. Mostly these laws are passed, I guess, to add one more charge to some unlucky schmuck to keep them away from "good" society longer. There is a larger problem here that needs to be addressed by better persons than myself.
Kansas thought about it. Failure to buy your tax stamps means that they can bust you for tax evasion also. Too bad it is unconstitutional as was proven in Leary v The United States when court decided unanimously that the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 was in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Well I guess they could. They could go down to SC and register and then, when the government tried to bust them for being subversives point out that having a law that requires you to testify against yourself is in violation of the Fifth Amendment much like Tim Leary did when this country passed the Marihuana Tax Act I mean, making the government and law makers look like a bunch of uneducated douches is kinda subversive act.
This is mostly likely unconstitutional. In Leary v The United States The Marihuana Tax Act (yes that is the "correct" spelling) was found to be in violation of the Fifth Amendment. I wish I could fire the people who come up with this stuff. It's like they don't even both to think. "Dur Hur, Lets make it illegal not to tell us you're a potential criminal." It scares me that we put these people in power.