i made a statement of fact. you claimed i didn't read the article. you called me a smartass. you made claims about measuring disk latency that could not be more wrong. but most of all you said i was wrong.
then i call you out on it USING THE SAME PHRASING YOU USED, and then you attack that... YOU WERE WRONG. you are probably wrong more than you are right, which has helped you develop this accusatory defense mechanism. i do have a wife. i do have dogs. you might want to consider putting a little more about yourself on the internet... perhaps then someone could find you and educate you, monkey.
first you replace "your" with "you're".... it takes a special kind of moron to do that.... then you claim measuring disk latency is something that is in some way more difficult or different than measuring any other kind of latency.
you are doing a service to yourself posting as AC to hide your identity... until that changes, you are NOTHING.
how bout i did read the fucking article? how about i never said it was about network latency? how about measuring disk latency is no different than measuring ANY latency? how about db latency using optimized table handlers ends up becoming exactly a problem of disk latency?
it's not just that is has rebar, it's also the implementation of the rebar. if it's ever exposed, then it's more susceptible to rust. many structures from before the 70s would have exposed rebar that ended up being the cause of early crumbling.
if the application can be written so it just requires generic variables (such as PHP's variable implementation) where sanity checking is part of the application and not the platform, then it should be very easy to write your own translator in any language you choose.
if the application relies on the platform to enforce variable types, then additional code will have to be inserted for platforms that don't provide such strict typing, a much more complicated task.
i prefer to code in PHP for business logic apps and roll my own type checking, same as i prefer to code in C for server daemons and roll my own memory management...
As long as Flash and its cousins Flex and Shockwave remain the simplest tools for producing drop-dead gorgeous Websites, they'll keep their place on the Internet.
[citation needed]
if HTML5 canvas with javascript wasn't worth using, then why did adobe already update their products to export to them?
i don't view the web using a flash browser, i use an HTML browser... HTML will obviously win.
the marketing world is not about winning... it is about keeping the spin going... making sure everyone is confused enough to be convinced they had it right from the beginning.
"Open Source" is about corporations not paying for developers to work. open source is about people who love computers making them work better for everyone.
the best bet is to only ever use it in OSI sense, but also to capitalize it (i.e. "Open Source", not "open source")
this is exactly my point... the spinsters in the industry push these ambiguous words like "open", "free", "proprietary", etc., like political spinsters push words like "liberal", "conservative", "socialist", etc.
i am not willing to stand by and let lawyers effectively copyright and redefine the word "open". either way they are wrong... something isn't truly open if it comes with terms and conditions.
this is my point... it IS open source when "open" is used as an adjective and "source" is used as a noun. you are using "open source" as if it meant something different than the sum of it's parts. it might not be the "open source" that you're talking about, but you can't truthfully say "it's not open source"... the source was made open.
burglary is always premeditated. There's no way to accidentally burgle someone's house, or do it in a fit of passion, or in self-defense.
NO way?
"hey, look at that house... they left their back door open... hey look, a purse sitting on the table... hey look, various loose electronics."
there are different laws dealing with crimes of "opportunity" that would apply to my example... i'm not sure why you think "accidentally" could apply, or where you got the idea that accidents imply a lack of premeditation.
In an interview, Stein said that the fact that LifeLock had to call and ask for the document to be removed reflected badly on Lifelock's service. 'I think this shows clearly that they know that it's got potential problems.'"
so a service designed to protect your privacy is broken if it actively attempts to protect your privacy? I think this shows clearly that they got a proactive strategy to protect personal information.
just because the CEO is willing to stick his chin out doesn't mean i trust him to stick MY chin out.
Slashdot Mirror
with the current open ended terms, there is no way this book could be a complete set... "just 'cause" will always still be an option for apple.
then i call you out on it USING THE SAME PHRASING YOU USED, and then you attack that... YOU WERE WRONG. you are probably wrong more than you are right, which has helped you develop this accusatory defense mechanism. i do have a wife. i do have dogs. you might want to consider putting a little more about yourself on the internet... perhaps then someone could find you and educate you, monkey.
you are NOTHING.
i agree that your children will probably be idiots not worth listening to...
that is why a translation layer would be needed...
When it comes to security, even hackers admit we're doing a better job making our products more secure than anyone else
when you're starting with the least secure, it's pretty easy to be the most "more secure".
polish up that turd, M$
first you replace "your" with "you're".... it takes a special kind of moron to do that.... then you claim measuring disk latency is something that is in some way more difficult or different than measuring any other kind of latency.
you are doing a service to yourself posting as AC to hide your identity... until that changes, you are NOTHING.
woah, yourself. you are NOTHING.
how bout i did read the fucking article? how about i never said it was about network latency? how about measuring disk latency is no different than measuring ANY latency? how about db latency using optimized table handlers ends up becoming exactly a problem of disk latency?
it's not just that is has rebar, it's also the implementation of the rebar. if it's ever exposed, then it's more susceptible to rust. many structures from before the 70s would have exposed rebar that ended up being the cause of early crumbling.
mapping latency in a system using colored maps representing throughput has been a tool of db and network sysadmins for many many MANY years.
if the application relies on the platform to enforce variable types, then additional code will have to be inserted for platforms that don't provide such strict typing, a much more complicated task.
i prefer to code in PHP for business logic apps and roll my own type checking, same as i prefer to code in C for server daemons and roll my own memory management...
it all depends on what types of data and control structures the application utilizes.
As long as Flash and its cousins Flex and Shockwave remain the simplest tools for producing drop-dead gorgeous Websites, they'll keep their place on the Internet.
[citation needed]
if HTML5 canvas with javascript wasn't worth using, then why did adobe already update their products to export to them?
i don't view the web using a flash browser, i use an HTML browser... HTML will obviously win.
Yahoo!
"Open Source" is about corporations not paying for developers to work. open source is about people who love computers making them work better for everyone.
when exploit code is made public then all other malware authors can add it to their payload
the best bet is to only ever use it in OSI sense, but also to capitalize it (i.e. "Open Source", not "open source")
this is exactly my point... the spinsters in the industry push these ambiguous words like "open", "free", "proprietary", etc., like political spinsters push words like "liberal", "conservative", "socialist", etc.
i am not willing to stand by and let lawyers effectively copyright and redefine the word "open". either way they are wrong... something isn't truly open if it comes with terms and conditions.
ever been shot by a potato gun? i'm guessing no, because you'd be dead.
Definitely not open source.
this is my point... it IS open source when "open" is used as an adjective and "source" is used as a noun. you are using "open source" as if it meant something different than the sum of it's parts. it might not be the "open source" that you're talking about, but you can't truthfully say "it's not open source"... the source was made open.
if you want to make a new proprietary term for software licensed and blessed by OSI, then do that... perhaps "OpenSource"
That doesn't make any sense to me.
burglary is always premeditated. There's no way to accidentally burgle someone's house, or do it in a fit of passion, or in self-defense.
NO way?
"hey, look at that house... they left their back door open... hey look, a purse sitting on the table... hey look, various loose electronics."
there are different laws dealing with crimes of "opportunity" that would apply to my example... i'm not sure why you think "accidentally" could apply, or where you got the idea that accidents imply a lack of premeditation.
who honestly thought anyone thought they were "untouchable" with this service? Seriously...
In an interview, Stein said that the fact that LifeLock had to call and ask for the document to be removed reflected badly on Lifelock's service. 'I think this shows clearly that they know that it's got potential problems.'"
so a service designed to protect your privacy is broken if it actively attempts to protect your privacy? I think this shows clearly that they got a proactive strategy to protect personal information.
just because the CEO is willing to stick his chin out doesn't mean i trust him to stick MY chin out.
It's that old saying, "Outlaw guns and the only people who will be hurt are honest citizens"
i thought the saying was "outlaw guns and the only people who will have guns will be outlaws"