Slashdot Mirror


Sticky Rice Is the Key To Super Strong Mortar

lilbridge writes "For over 1,500 years the Chinese have been using sticky rice as an ingredient in mortar, which has resulted in super strong buildings, many of which are still standing after hundreds of years. Scientists have been studying the sticky rice and lime mortar to unlock the secrets of its strength, and have just determined the secret ingredient that makes the mortar more stable and stronger. The scientists have also concluded that this mixture is the most appropriate for restoration of ancient and historic buildings, which means it is probably also appropriate for new construction as well."

194 comments

  1. Two more by qortra · · Score: 5, Funny

    Based on experiences with my dishwasher, I can also predict that buildings made with oatmeal or cheese will also stand the test of time.

    1. Re:Two more by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or potatos. Do NOT put potatos down your garbage disposal; I found that out the hard way. Had to rent an electric plumber's snake to unplug the damned drain. The disposal has no problems, it's after they go down the drain and harden.

    2. Re:Two more by timeOday · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Rice is pretty strong. My wife once dumped a partially-cooked pot of rice down the kitchen sink, where it proceeded to swell up to an impenetrable clog. Being a fool, I got a plunger and just kept at it with increasing force until the all the water (and drano) that had pooled up, suddenly went right down the drain - and straight into the cupboard, because I'd knocked the rice-cemented plumbing right off the bottom of the sink.

    3. Re:Two more by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or potatos. Do NOT put potatos down your garbage disposal; I found that out the hard way. Had to rent an electric plumber's snake to unplug the damned drain. The disposal has no problems, it's after they go down the drain and harden.

      It's ok Dan, you can use 'Es' this time.

      But on a serious note, you were essentially putting one half of a binary glue down your drain. The other part of that binary product is water which your disposal kindly mixed for you.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatpaste

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    4. Re:Two more by hedwards · · Score: 1

      For organic matter you're frequently better off using enzymes or bacteria to deal with slow drains than chemicals. Although in this case I doubt that would've done much good as you generally need some water flow in order for it to work properly.

    5. Re:Two more by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's what BP should do to the oil well... dump a lot of pots of half-cooked rice down it :)

    6. Re:Two more by nigelo · · Score: 5, Funny

      The other favourite is to carefully capture the dirty water in a bucket when disconnecting the drain, stand up, then think: 'where can I lose this? I know! Down the drain...' Wet feet.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    7. Re:Two more by nizo · · Score: 1

      I recently had a problem with my disposal, but it was just the peels that did it.

    8. Re:Two more by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      In this instance what he needed was a bucket and a new "P" trap. Or at least a bucket and a chisel, to remove the cemented rice. I have had plenty of maintenance men say that rice kills pipes.

      Raw rice isn't too good for birds either as they tend to eat, drink, expand & explode. Similar to pitching a seagull an Alka Seltzer, only in slow motion. This is why the tradition was changed to throw bird seed.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:Two more by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That, is some seriously awesome thing to know. It makes so much sense too, if you think about the last time you made pasta...

      No more Scotch tape for me!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Two more by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      well, seeing as they have tried just about everything else (and given each try an absurd name), it may be worth a shot. Call it 'operation stir fry kill'

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Two more by hedge49 · · Score: 1

      And my ex put several potato and rice rich casserole science projects down the drain/disposal, then had the nerve to ask what happened when the dishwasher barfed. My penance was to crawl under the house and saw off the cast iron trap, then rebuild during several round trips to the local iron monger. Now I know why plumbers have a love/hate relationship with disposals.

    12. Re:Two more by eclectus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The 'feeding rice to birds will make them swell up & explode' is a myth. snopes even says so.

      http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/birdrice.asp

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    13. Re:Two more by mmandt · · Score: 1

      Are they saying they cook the rice before they add it to the mortar?

    14. Re:Two more by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Glad I'm not the only one.

    15. Re:Two more by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Garbage disposals really aren't that great of an idea. Job security for plumbers, basically.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    16. Re:Two more by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Wow, I stand corrected. Then why is bird feed better than rice? Hmm...

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    17. Re:Two more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hehe. Glad I'm not the only one.

      Actually, you are. We're talking about you.

    18. Re:Two more by kasimbaba · · Score: 1

      Obviously you don't know much about rice. The article's talking about 'sticky rice' and uncooked rice is not at all sticky.

    19. Re:Two more by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Easy to answer - RICE GOT EXPENSIVE. Time was, rice was cheap and plentiful, so people threw rice. After the expansion of the corn lobby in the USA, a lot of farmers (many in areas that are shit-stupid to grow corn in) switched over to corn, and so there was a lot less rice available. Price went up for rice, price went down (thanks to wasteful subsidy $$$$ for way too fucking much corn than we can properly use), and people went looking for an alternative to toss at weddings. That's also when the stoners came up with the idea of using soap bubble wands...

    20. Re:Two more by russ1337 · · Score: 3, Funny

      while living in Military barracks we had single rooms each with a sink and cupboard against one wall. It was a common prank to disconnect the drain in a buddies room while he was out drinking, because you *knew* he was going to piss in it during the night instead of walking all the way down to the toilets.

      the thought process is excellent: ahhh..... wait why are my feet wet! no no no ... can't stop!....ahh f&K it....

    21. Re:Two more by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Operation Cold Porridge. And then when that fails, their second try will be Operation Cold Porridge 2: Lumpy Chunks.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    22. Re:Two more by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bird feed often contains sunflower seeds and other seeds with higher fat and protein content. Birds like that more.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    23. Re:Two more by tywjohn · · Score: 0

      What about sticky bed sheets?

    24. Re:Two more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they don't explode, I've seen birds too gorged on grain spilled on a road to fly out of the way of oncoming vehicles. Can you say squish?

    25. Re:Two more by tsa · · Score: 1

      Rice is very slippery, and therefore dangerous to have lying on the street, because the grains are round. Bird seeds are flatter. Another thing is: wet rice is slippery because of the sticky substance that it turns into.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    26. Re:Two more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason rice is asked to not be tossed is that it does swell ...in between the mortar and stones that usually line the entrances of churches and has been known to crack the stones and mortar...birds eat seeds all the time rice is no different...

    27. Re:Two more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the potatoes are put down somebody else's garbage disposal, then it's perfectly okay (like an evil ex, or a landlord's).

    28. Re:Two more by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's ok Dan

      That's my cousin ;)

      I'm surprised anyone has heard of that poem these days. Back in my dad's day (he's 79) they taught it in school.

    29. Re:Two more by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The closest I've ever come to buying a garbage disposal was buying a house that had one already installed. That's what empty coffee cans are for.

    30. Re:Two more by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Dangerous Dan McGrew is used in a Warner Brothers cartoon, which helps its long term popularity.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    31. Re:Two more by tomhuxley · · Score: 1

      I think the original comment was a shot at Dan Quayle not McGrew ... for misspelling potatos (Dan Quayle added an "e" to singular potato, mcgrew removed "e" from plural potatoes ... hence, "It's ok Dan, you can use 'Es' this time.").

    32. Re:Two more by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Also "Quick Draw McGraw". When I was a kid, the mailman called me "Quick Drew McGrew".

    33. Re:Two more by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've ever seen a garbage disposal my whole life. Seems like a very "American thing", the rest of the world is perfectly capable of throwing waste in the GARBAGE before doing their dishes :/

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    34. Re:Two more by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Wheatpaste is awesome for band flyers. There's a flyer wheatpasted to the side of a building to this day advertising a Doobie Brothers show that we missed nearly 40 years ago.

    35. Re:Two more by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Sorry I was poking fun at the ex Vice-President for incorrectly correcting a student on the spelling of the word potato.

      Though I appreciate the linking of the poem, I'll take a look at it this evening.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  2. The romans build concrete buildings by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many of which are still standing, 2000 years later.

    I predict the common factor may be the concrete.

    hth.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell that to the idiots who build the building I am working in in the 70s - concrete, and nothing but concrete. It is crumbling now. Yay for engineering efforts...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      romans built strong concrete as they had volcanic ash to work with. volcanic ash unlike rice is hard to find.
      so no, the common factor in both cases is not the same.

    3. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by jgagnon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Water is also a common ingredient. Hmmm... :p

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    4. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are people who know how to do concrete right. And then there are people who know how to do concrete cheap.

    5. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're working in the 70s? Aren't wages much lower? Why don't you invest in Apple, Microsoft, or IBM instead?

    6. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Works for Eskimos...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    7. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're sure there's no rebar, no iron at all? I doubt it. It's the iron inside the concrete that contributes to its decay, because the metal expands and contracts with seasonal changes in temperature. Concrete without iron in it may be structurally weaker, but it will last a lot longer if kept within proper parameters for loads. (Hence why the Romans' stuff is still around.)

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    8. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One additive that gives strength to concrete the Roman built with is blood. It doesn't have to be human blood. Funny how the quality of concrete and steel deteriorated during the period 1200 - 1500. I wonder what could have been going on in Europe then. ;) Blood still works well, but does tend to tint the material pinkish or reddish for a long time.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    9. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course there is rebar - the point I was trying to make is that concrete as such is not the common factor, it is how you treat the concrete, it is what you add to it. On the current topic - the rice might actually be an interesting factor. I was just trying to load off some snark on the "ohh, it is the concrete, stupid scientists"-crap posted above.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    10. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by EggyToast · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't concrete -- it's lime mortar (which isn't used anymore). This is just a very hard lime mortar due to the additives -- it doesn't give any strength comparisons to portland cement. I imagine it's significantly less strong, though, despite the headline. This is "super strong" compared to plain ol' lime mortar.

    11. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what could have been going on in Europe then. ;)

      Christianity

    12. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 0

      it's not just that is has rebar, it's also the implementation of the rebar. if it's ever exposed, then it's more susceptible to rust. many structures from before the 70s would have exposed rebar that ended up being the cause of early crumbling.

    13. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It wasn't until the 80's or 90's that romans use of fly ash became common knowledge. Back in the 70's, roman concrete was still in the "ancient mysteries" column.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by need4mospd · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the iron inside the concrete that contributes to its decay, because the metal expands and contracts with seasonal changes in temperature.

      Uh, so does concrete. Actually, they expand and contract at nearly the same exact rate depending on the composition of the steel and concrete. Without the steel you'd need a ridiculous amount of concrete to make up for it because concrete has a lower tensile strength. Adding enough concrete to make it work properly would make concrete structures very bulky and would limit their height considerably.

      (Hence why the Romans' stuff is still around.)

      The Roman stuff is still around because it was VERY thick, not because it didn't have steel. It probably would be in significantly better shape if they used steel.

    15. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      We actually do have a common factor with volcanic ash called fly ash. It's properties are very similar to volcanic ash and quite easy to come by with all the coal power plants around. As stated above, Roman's built strong concrete because it was incredibly thick. Modern concrete at the same thickness would last far longer, but it's prohibitively expensive and bulky.

    16. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      "Nearly" is the operative word here. Repeat a 'near' difference 2000 times and tell me how inconsequential it is, especially when it comes to shifting the weight of a structure over and over again.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    17. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by nizo · · Score: 1

      It got harder to throw enough workers into the mixers.

    18. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by need4mospd · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Nearly" is the operative word here. Repeat a 'near' difference 2000 times and tell me how inconsequential it is, especially when it comes to shifting the weight of a structure over and over again.

      That's not really how it works. After the concrete cures the concrete and steel are at a sort of equilibrium. Whenever the structure is at or close to that temperature, everything is peachy. It's at extreme temperatures when you start to see expansion(or contraction). The coefficient of thermal expansion for concrete and steel are not only very close, they are extremely low. Meaning you'd need un-earthly variations before you'd see any detectable amount of variation.

    19. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      That last sentence almost made sense. But it's 5 o'clock and I'm going home so I don't care.

    20. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're working in the 70s? Aren't wages much lower? Why don't you invest in Apple, Microsoft, or IBM instead?

      You're working in the 70s? Aren't wages much lower? Why don't you invest in Apple, Microsoft, or IBM instead?

      Because it will take 40 years for apple stock to be worth anything.

    21. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, there's an old TV movie I've been looking for - "Three on a Date" - can you tape it for me? It'll probably be on in 1978. Just put it in a mailbox and the Matrix will get it to me.

    22. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      You're working in the 70s?

      Yes... Internet connections were *very* slow back then. That's why his message took around 35 years to reach Slashdot. In fact, he was very insightful, as Slashdot wouldn't be invented for almost another quarter century.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    23. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by ShakaUVM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eh, I thought the secret ingredient in Roman concrete was volcanic ash? When medieval people elsewhere tried making concrete to the ancient specifications, they ended up with some watery messes and gave up on the whole thing for centuries.

    24. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't make things like they used to.

    25. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The fun part is keeping the water in the concrete from causing the rust itself... (oh, and you have to seal it too, because concrete will absorb water. Enough water and the rebar will rust..)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    26. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The Black Plague was happening during that time (peak 1350), you would think they could have gotten enough blood and another spare parts you wanted.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    27. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Funny

      So that's why there aren't any Roman toilets around anymore. They couldn't handle the load.

    28. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Because it will take 40 years for apple stock to be worth anything.

      But you could double your money in that time!

      (actually, compared to most people's 401k performance over the last 3 years, that WOULD be an improvement.)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    29. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      As has been already stated, the concrete and steel bond and do expand and contract at the same rate. Additionally, the pH of the concrete is what prevents the steel from rusting. Usually. This is why they will throw crappy, rusted rebar into the mix, as it won't matter as soon as it sets up.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    30. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Also note that the steel is elastic. It will give to make up for the slight difference in the coefficients of thermal expansion.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    31. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      thank you. if I had mod points i'd mod you up. informative probably.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    32. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      > This is why they will throw crappy, rusted rebar into the mix, as it won't
      > matter as soon as it sets up.

      They use rusty rebar intentionally. Concrete bonds well to rusty steel.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    33. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by treeves · · Score: 1

      He's working in *his* 70's. His memory falters from time to time. Give him a break.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    34. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That equilibrium is not perfect. The difference does stress and wear the structure over decades, centuries, millennia, especially in temperate zones where temperature can vary more than 100 degrees a year. Like I say, repeat that for 2000 years and see what things look like. You're right, the difference is very low, but when you're talking about really large structures over really long periods, ANY difference is significant. In that scenario, solid concrete stands a better chance, so long as it's not overloaded.

      It's a moot point, because nobody builds anything to last for millennia. The Romans' work has done so by coincidence, but the useful life of buildings and other structures is measured primarily in decades, occasionally in centuries, but never in millennia. So rebar it is.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    35. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Larryish · · Score: 1

      These days fiber is the way to go.

      Concrete with fiber in it is good and strong, and in my experience (dad pours concrete for a living) it cracks less than concrete without.

    36. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's not that all of Rome had a great secret we don't know, it's just that the many less successful mixes are long gone without a trace.

      The particular mixes used in the buildings that are still standing would be worth studying.

    37. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I dunno... Build another "largest unsupported concrete dome" but with with rebar and we'll talk.. in two thousand years...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    38. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Also, Rome is in a pretty moderate climate: the temperature and humidity does not vary much throughout any given year. Compare this to conditions in, say, the Northeast US, Northern Europe, or even the Western US: the temperature varies significantly, and there is notably more moisture throughout the year - which will seep into the cement and contribute to its decay.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    39. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just a piece of concrete-nerd pedantry: The Romans didn't use fly ash - that comes from coal-fired electricity generation, which I'm reasonably sure they hadn't invented yet. It was volcanic ash, "pozzolana". Similar chemistry, but made in a volcano instead of a coal boiler.

    40. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did they get all the dog shit to attract that many flies?

    41. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Alamais · · Score: 1

      Mm, but perhaps pus is not so good as an additive. *gag*

    42. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      type 10 when it should have been type 50???

    43. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      The bandwidth's great. It's just the latency thats killing us back here

    44. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      Yay someone with a brain. I'm a concrete finisher and carpenter and you are absolutly right. We leave all our rebar outside for a year or so to rust. When we get a truck of new rebar delivered its "oh shit now we can't use it for a while" and then we find some rusty shit.

    45. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      bullshit fibre reinforced is crap and its hard to finish. Bust some rod and then you don't have to worry about crack as long as you have proper relief cuts/expansion joints.

    46. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      replacement for silica perhaps? The Romans also used pigs blood which helped entrain air in the concrete. It helps protect against the freeze/thaw cycle and incresse the compression strength.

    47. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Calinous · · Score: 1

      However, rust will increase the volume of the rebar (red rust specifically), and will lead to concrete chipping (if the rebar is near surface).

    48. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Genda · · Score: 1

      Actually, what makes the Roman concrete unique is that their formulation produced a concrete with amazingly small pores. The stuff is virtually impervious to weather. In fact there are a number of ancient harbors (2000 year and more) lined with the stuff, and it's still around and hard as ever.

    49. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as the operating temperature is specified in the quote, I don't see a problem...

    50. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by JustABlitheringIdiot · · Score: 1

      Number of different possibilities for why it's crumbling it is really dependent on the location of the building.

      You can check out Wikipedia for a quick review of some of the mechanisms.

      You probably won't see a chloride reaction unless you work at the beach and the building is exposed to salt in high concentrations. But if you are in the midwestern US there is a very good possibility that you are likely experiencing an Alkali-Silica reaction essentially to put it in simple terms your building is turning to jelly from the inside out. Concrete from the 70's is particularly prone to that problem because of the level of knowledge about it and the lack of a treatment for it at the time combined with the materials that were common in that era. The symptoms can look similar to the freeze thaw cycle cracking seen in northern climates.

      Concrete has come a long way since the pozzolanic mixtures the Romans used and it is significantly different than concrete from even as much as 35-40 years ago.

    51. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      That's correct. I remember now it was volcanic ash that they used -- I guess the article said it was "like fly ash" or something so that's the primary key my brain stored it under.

      Still amazing how far and fast we have come in the last 30 years from 1980 to 2010. It is getting very science fictiony at times.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    52. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by zobier · · Score: 1

      Who said you could introduce sense into our idle speculation?

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    53. Re:The romans build concrete buildings by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      HEY!....we could pick up all that volcanic ash from Iceland right now and sell it to those needing a concrete strengthener...cool, a good outcome from a bad situation...let me go get my shovel!

  3. Amylopectin by Verdatum · · Score: 4, Informative

    I didn't know the critical ingredient was a mystery. Alton Brown from Good Eats explained the molecule quite well in the rice episode, and my immediate thought was "oh that must be why it was used in mortar for the Great Wall and such."

    1. Re:Amylopectin by EggyToast · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thing is, lime mortar hasn't really been used for about 150 years, so there's no research into it for modern building applications. Since OPC is better in every regard, including strength, repairing old lime mortar hasn't really been of concern until recently, when there's been more of a push to accurately repair historical buildings and structures. However, you're not exactly right with the Great Wall -- it was built 2200 years ago, whereas TFA notes that this particular process was done 1500 years ago.

      Still, I imagine this was also prevalent in Pre-Columbian architecture too, only with corn. Boil the corn, then use the leftover water.

    2. Re:Amylopectin by rritterson · · Score: 5, Informative

      From reading the physorg summary linked in the article linked in the summary on Slashdot (why we have to link to tertiary sources, I don't know) it seems that it isn't the polymer branching of the molecule that lends the mortar strength- the amylopectin doesn't even directly add strength as far as I can tell. Instead, it's that the amylopectin breaks up the crystallization of the lime in the mortar, creating micro crystals instead. I can imagine a big crystal being quite brittle with all of the possible shear planes.

      So, it wasn't as obvious to me why the amylopectin made it stronger.

      --
      -Ryan
      AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    3. Re:Amylopectin by serbanp · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, you're not exactly right with the Great Wall -- it was built 2200 years ago, whereas TFA notes that this particular process was done 1500 years ago. .

      ugh, the Great Wall was nominally finished during the Ming dynasty, in the 1400s. Unlike the oldest sections, built with rammed soil and stone, the more modern parts did use bricks and mortar.

    4. Re:Amylopectin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Great Wall of China is a wreck. The bit you see in photos is the bit that was rebuilt in the 50s. The rest of it looks as old as it is.

    5. Re:Amylopectin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lime mortar is better than Portland Cement for long life. This is because it is more pliable meaning that where cement cracks (say as a result of an earthquake) lime mortar may not crack. A downside is that it can be more susceptible to water and when wet it will be softer.

    6. Re:Amylopectin by mustavaleeke · · Score: 1

      It depends where you live in the world. In my region, Perth Western Australia, 90% of houses are double brick construction. There is plenty of architectural research into the use and stability of lime mortar mixes used in the early to mid 20th century brick buildings. In Australia, the use of lime mortar was in common use until the late 1950's. Lime mortar will only work and is only suitable in a cool climate because the lime mortar absorbs moisture from the atmosphere to keep it stable. In parts of Australia especially Perth Western Australia, over time the lime mortar becomes dry and turns to powder due to the dry climate. The simple solution is to cement render the walls. No different to sealing rammed earth construction walls. 8 parts clean sand, 2 parts Portland cement and one part lime was used for building brick walls for many years until detergent additives replaced the lime. The only purpose of detergent is to make the mixture pliable for the bricklayer. The problem with detergent additives is that the detergent eventually leaches through the mixture where using lime actually helps to harden the mixture. (Modern Portland cement is manufactured by super-heating clay and crushed limestone. When combined with water a chemical reaction occurs and binds both products. When lime is added to the mixture a farther chemical reaction occurs.) Lime mortar was used in England for hundreds of years. Some of the buildings are over 500 years old and still in good condition. They will remain standing long after the Australian houses collapse.

  4. Sounds like by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ancient Chinese Secret

    1. Re:Sounds like by monkeyboythom · · Score: 0

      Except they don't put the lime in the coconut

    2. Re:Sounds like by corbettw · · Score: 1

      No, it was rice, not Calgon.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  5. Where will the rice come from? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Er, do we have such an overabundance of rice that it can be pressed into use as a building material?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly! Rice doesn't grow on trees, you know!

    2. Re:Where will the rice come from? by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      China probably does.. I mean sure it has a billion people, but apparently it produces 25% of the world's rice.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Where will the rice come from? by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, it is not like it grows in trees...

      One main advantage is that it is easier to replenish than minerals. You can grow a field of rice, collect it and then grow it again next year. If you get a mineral (v.g. carbon) from a mine, the next year your only chance to get more carbon is to dig further. Also it helps capturing CO2 from air instead of adding into it.

      DISCLAIMER1: I know rice is a plant but not a tree.

      DISCLAIMER2: I am not saying that this mortar has no disavantages (old buildings may have survived a long time, but they used walls several times thicker than we have now; perhaps using it with moderns bricks is not useful. Anyway, an interesting idea.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    4. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Jeng · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, we do have enough rice.

      We have enough food production that no one should go hungry.

      People go hungry due to politics and poor distribution, not overall quantity of food.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Where will the rice come from? by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone might be able to make a genetically modified version that grows on walls. That would be cool.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    6. Re:Where will the rice come from? by EggyToast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We could, but it doesn't matter -- we don't use lime mortar anymore. We use portland cement.

    7. Re:Where will the rice come from? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      People go hungry due to politics and poor distribution, not overall quantity of food.

      Actually, we have the capacity to deal with poor distribution as well, so it all boils down to politics. Someone is deciding that people should starve to death.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Where will the rice come from? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      i wonder what the R value on the thicker walls is, and if it is cheaper per foot of wall? even if you have to make it longer to get the same inside space, it could be cheaper and more insulating.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    9. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is deciding that people should starve to death.

      Usually the people who think they ought to be paid for producing the food, the bastards!

    10. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know politicians and soldiers produced food.

      People starve in countries despite aid workers attempting to give them food for free. Their governments block the aid shipments, for profit or to keep weak political and ethnic groups they dislike.

    11. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we have the capacity to deal with poor distribution as well, so it all boils down to politics. Someone is deciding that people should starve to death.

      Sorry about that. My bad.

    12. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Calinous · · Score: 1

      Double the width gives double the insulation. However, it will also need more heat to to change its temperature. This is bad if you want to heat it quickly (as common insulation techniques makes the heating systems underpowered for quick heating). However, this is good if you use it as a heat sink (heating in the day and cooling in the night) - it will oppose temperature variations.
            As for my opinion, you're better off with dedicated insulation materials (either expanded polystyrene or mineral fibers) and smaller walls. Thick masonry comes with the issue of windows (you need thick windows as well to prevent the condensation due to the cold wall near frames).

    13. Re:Where will the rice come from? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like lots and lots and lots of people deciding its somebody else's problem.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. A lot of people don't even realize that most of our rice in the western world comes from Thailand.

    15. Re:Where will the rice come from? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      By politics, you actually mean 'economics'. The rich buy all the food, eat way more than they need and waste loads of it, whilst people in the third-world can't afford any.

    16. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      No, I meant politics.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    17. Re:Where will the rice come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  6. sounds like a job for the MythBusters! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    sounds like a job for the MythBusters!

    1. Re:sounds like a job for the MythBusters! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see them pump the sticky rice down an oil well to find out if it works better than duct tape.

    2. Re:sounds like a job for the MythBusters! by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see them pump the sticky rice down an oil well to find out if it works better than duct tape.

      Maybe that's who BP needs to hire?

    3. Re:sounds like a job for the MythBusters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time somebody at the ministry of Ancient Secrets in Beijing has a slow day we wind up with some stupid thing that you can disprove in ten minutes on Google.

      The Chinese claim to have invented everything!
      Oh please..

    4. Re:sounds like a job for the MythBusters! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      better than duct tape

      SYNTAX ERROR

    5. Re:sounds like a job for the MythBusters! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It's sad that, even though they have zero experience doing this kind of thing, I now have more confidence that the Mythbusters could get the oil leak plugged up quicker than BP.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  7. The Great Wall of America by tacarat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So is this a good time to invest in California calrose growers?

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  8. Damn you Mongolians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sticky rice keep those damn Mongorians from browing up my shitty wall!

    1. Re:Damn you Mongolians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol!!

    2. Re:Damn you Mongolians! by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      Hey my Mongolian ancestors blew up prenty of walls.

  9. US Homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US they don't even build homes with bricks. Almost all mew home constructions are wooden shacks.

    1. Re:US Homes by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      It's worse then that. They just built a whole new neighborhood in Beaverton, Oregon, designed to look like on old downtown shopping district. All the buildings are woodframe covered with brick facing!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:US Homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness Mew are so rare or this could be a problem.

    3. Re:US Homes by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      And? The developer obviously wanted ~75% of the effect, instead of 100% but with doubled costs. What's your point?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:US Homes by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should see what we build our trailer parks out of.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:US Homes by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While bricks are awesome aesthetically (IMO), they are really only a good idea in very stable areas. If you are near fault lines like the West Coast of the US and are at risk for earthquakes, stay away from brick buildings. When the earth moves, you want to move with it. Smaller wooden structures are very good at that.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    6. Re:US Homes by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      You should see what we build our trailer parks out of.

      ...Dirt?

    7. Re:US Homes by eggy78 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jack Daniels and broken dreams?

    8. Re:US Homes by BrentH · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The point is there're two places they build with wood: the Third World and America...

    9. Re:US Homes by cowscows · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is extremely rare these days to build a building with load-bearing brick walls. To go up more than a couple stories, the walls end up being ridiculously thick, and as a result ridiculously heavy. So you end up not just paying for lots more brick, but also for a much more serious foundation. Your labor costs also go way up, because bricklaying is time consuming, and harder to do well than you might think.

      Most brick buildings are just a veneer, whether they're over concrete, steel, or wood. Wood is actually one of the hardest to do, because the wood tends to shrink over time while the brick tends to expand due to heat and moisture. The brick is tied back to the wood pretty regularly, so these changes can cause serious cracking if you don't design for it.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    10. Re:US Homes by Threni · · Score: 1

      Trash?

    11. Re:US Homes by drwho · · Score: 1

      ...and Nordic countries?

    12. Re:US Homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that the other problem with building out of non-reinforced brick (or cinderblock) is that they deal with earthquakes very, very poorly.
      Woodframe structures, on the other hand, deal with earthquakes relatively well.

    13. Re:US Homes by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Aus too...

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    14. Re:US Homes by Calinous · · Score: 1

      There are advantages in woodframe buildings - they're lighter than masonry (simple foundations), they're quick to set up (a couple of days or a couple of weeks), you don't have to carry so much mass to the construction site (like tons and tons of bricks and mortars and water), they don't have to dry after being built up (a typical 60-70 square meters apartment will have about 10 cubic meters of finishing concrete/shotcrete, which makes for about a ton of water that needs to evaporate from the walls).
            On the other hand, brick walls have advantages too - they're load bearing (even on a non-load-bearing brick wall you can fix suspended furnitures), they're simple to build (although slow), and can be built of modern materials (porous, light construction blocks).

    15. Re:US Homes by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Only on the inside.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  10. I hope this doesn't take by TooMad · · Score: 1

    Sticky rice is for sushi and sushi alone. If the demand for sticky rice goes up then the cost for already expensive sushi goes up and we can't have that.

    1. Re:I hope this doesn't take by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You need to try sticky rice with mango - my mouth started watering as soon as I saw the title for this story just thinking about it. Sticky rice is for a lot more than sushi.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:I hope this doesn't take by Tarlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strange as it sounds, sticky rice with apples and peanut butter (and perhaps some cinnamon) is quite delicious as well. I'll be putting the mango on my to-try list, though...

      --
      /* No Comment */
    3. Re:I hope this doesn't take by Threni · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're wrong, I'm afraid. Although the rice used in Sushi is sticky, it's not what is generally called sticky/glutinous rice. Sticky rice is used in various Asian, especially Thai dishes, either with savoury food like pork, or as a dessert with fruit such as with mango or durian, and salty coconut milk.

    4. Re:I hope this doesn't take by CCarrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sticky rice is for sushi and sushi alone.

      Ahh, no my friend, the best application for sticky rice is being steamed together with yummy chinese sausages and chicken, all wrapped up in a banana leaf...mmmm...sticky rice...

      Speaking of possible industrial uses for Dim Sum foods, I propose shrimp dumplings as a universal lubricant. At least the darn things always are whenever they see me coming at them with a pair of chopsticks...

      cc

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    5. Re:I hope this doesn't take by icebrain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Drizzle a little coconut milk over the top. Had this at a local Thai place, and now I want to make it myself. Just have to figure out how they got the mango to be a bit less sour...

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    6. Re:I hope this doesn't take by Alamais · · Score: 1

      ?!...mango? sour? I think the secret you're looking for is: let your mangoes ripen properly. A ripe mango should be soft, fragrant and sweet.

    7. Re:I hope this doesn't take by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      That's the way I had it when I was in Chiang Mai and Bangkok this spring. Absolutely delicious. Going back in the fall and looking forward to that and many other great foods.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  11. Shamwow Guy? by drumcat · · Score: 1

    We need the Shamwow Guy to do commercials comparing this to his caulk.

    1. Re:Shamwow Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We need the Shamwow Guy to do commercials comparing this to his caulk.

      haha caulk!

    2. Re:Shamwow Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Billy Mays isn't around to pull a fully-loaded tractor trailer using only rice goo.

  12. Once you see the rice in action ... by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    you'll shit bricks.

    1. Re:Once you see the rice in action ... by darthdavid · · Score: 3, Funny

      More like cinder-blocks...

    2. Re:Once you see the rice in action ... by kkwst2 · · Score: 1

      Huh? I'm definitely not eating off your dishes.

  13. Will someone please... by AngryNick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...provide this information to BP?

    1. Re:Will someone please... by swanzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...provide this information to BP?

      Dear BP,

      Scientists have concluded that sticky rice/lime mortar is the most appropriate for restoration of ancient and historic buildings.

      How is that oil spill thing going?

      Best regards,

      some guy on ./

  14. Slash or Dot by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    Rice...humm... are we talking about slash or dot on this site? You can tell when nerds get outside of their comfort zone in discussion...they will end up by talking about sex or food. I see the food comments above...

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  15. Recipe? by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 1

    This article is useless without a recipe!

  16. Rice absorbs water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less water is available for the hydration reaction.
    The water-to-cement ratio goes up.
    Therefore the strength of the concrete/mortar goes up.

  17. Darn right! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How MUCH sticky rice per how much lime, etc. Or how much purified additive? (Though adding cooked(?) rice, as the Chinese did, would probably end up inexpensive and may also add more strength as it collapses and forms voids, making a concrete foam structure.)

    I was about to make a post complaining about the lack of useful information. But you beat me to it AND phrased it brilliantly. Kudos.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Darn right! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      ... and may also add more strength as it collapses and forms voids, making a concrete foam structure

      "add more strength" should have read "increase strength to weight ratio and/or toughness".

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  18. By the same logic .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beans should dramatically improve explosives.

    1. Re:By the same logic .... by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Beans should dramatically improve explosives.

      ...and jalapenos should improve flamethrowers...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  19. why doesn't the rice part biodegrade ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why doesn't the rice part biodegrade ?

  20. Hard to find volcanic ash.. by DeafZombie · · Score: 1

    Europe would disagree with that statement...

    --
    The Binary Anti-Pattern [http://beyondboolean.blogspot.com/]
  21. Not to worry! by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    As soon as Monsanto works out how to create GMO corn that produces amylopectin, we'll be all set to use it in America!

    .

  22. Brace yourselves gentlemen by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    According to the gas chromatograph, the secret ingredient in Chinese construction is... Love!? Who's been screwing with this thing?

    .

    1. Re:Brace yourselves gentlemen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the gas chromatograph, the secret ingredient in Chinese construction is... Love!? Who's been screwing with this thing? .

      stop trying to be like that unfunny jon stewart

  23. Super str5ong Mortar by rossdee · · Score: 1

    What is the effective range, and what calibre projectiles does it fire?

    Can it be equipped with smart munitions? I hear they have even developed anti-tank rounds for 81mm and 120mm mortars.

  24. Yeah, but 70s buildings are extraordinarily ugly by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Would you really want it to last 2000 years?

    Take Cumbernauld as an example. Very definitely not.

    Which is another thing. Concrete doesn't have to be ugly. So WTF are so many modern concrete buildings so god damned ugly?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete

     

    --
    Deleted
  25. Strong doesn't mean good, and rebar as a flaw by drwho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mortar that's too strong is brittle, meaning it can easily crack. Rebar can rust and swell, breaking this brittle cement. The result is catastrophic. I learned this from a couple of masons who I was drinking with at a pub. They joke that because of some really bad decisions made by architects and structural engineers in the 1960s and 1970s, they have good job security. I had known from reading books on restoring historical masonry buildings (thanks Ian Cramb) that strong mortar such as portland cement and other more modern mixes are just too brittle to be used as mortar. Stones and bricks shift ever so slightly as they settle. This can cause cracks, large or small, in the brittle mortar, that wouldn't happen with a weak lime mortar. These cracks are the widened by water freezing and thawing, and sometimes plant life. But what my bar buddies told me is that what makes the problem even worse is the rebar used in concrete buildings until recently would slowly rust and swell, so the masonry would burst from the inside because it was so brittle. These mason fellows would chip out the remaining concrete or cement, clean and coat the rebar (but sometimes replacing it) with a protecting paint, and then re-apply cement or concrete. I've noticed this problem occuring in many places, such as subway stations and bridges in the Boston area. I have no reason to believe the problem is limited to this city.

    Regarding Roman cements and concrete: pozzolana, otherwise known as hydraulic cement, was a mixture containing volcanic ash, specifically from mount Vensuvius. It has the ability to dry and set underwater. This 'secret' is said by many to have been lost for many centuries, but in fact was kept a 'masonic secret' by some masonic guilds for a long time. Yet the exact nature of this secret and its revelation are hazy.

    Yes, blood was used as an ad-mixture to some Roman cements. I can't remember what benefit it added.

    Some places add organic material to concrete, with a variety of results. Done correctly, it increases the strength of concrete. Done badly, it's a recepie for disaster. Using straw is certainly bad, but evidently hemp and possibly other materials can be used. Exactly what works under given conditions is not known to me. It may be another one of the 'masonic' secrets.

    1. Re:Strong doesn't mean good, and rebar as a flaw by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Epoxy coating the re-bar has not been proven effective. What the masons you had a beer with is typical of the trades, they don't understand the big picture because they are focused on their job. No engineers or architects screwed up (other than the very few public examples of failure). Buildings are designed for a certain life, typically that's 50-70 years and after that the building is expected to need capital investment in the infrastructure beyond routine maintenance to extend that life. Buildings could easily be designed to last longer but the longer the life the higher the cost and it's rare for an owner to care. Buildings could easily be designed to take fires, earthquakes, tornado's and hurricanes but the costs of such design make it illogical.

      The masons you mentioned talked about paint, it's not paint it's epoxy and it's a highly unproven technology (unless you are talking to the epoxy association, then it's the end all be all of re-bar protection). There are some in the engineering sector that think Epoxy coating re-bar is going to be one of those big mistakes that comes back and haunts us endlessly in a few decades (epoxy coated steel has been in use since the late 80's). The thing is concrete by itself is highly alkaline, the steel itself is alkaline as well and this prevents corrosion (which needs acidic environments to thrive, remember it's an oxidation process). The problem with epoxy is it negates the alkalinity effect of the concrete. In a perfect world the epoxy would be clean and perfect after the concrete sets but in reality the epoxy is going to have abrasions and cuts from erection, pouring and finishing (not counting what a decade of thermal expansion does to it). These abrasions in the epoxy coat provide a path of corrosion and once it penetrates the abrasion and infects the steel it can move along the steel much quicker because of the epoxy coat protecting the corrosion from alkalinity of the concrete. IMO a much better solution is galvanizing, the zinc coating has an additional alkaline protection and is much more durable during construction than epoxy ever can be. Either that or use high ksi stainless steel.

      Boston is not alone in problems with re-bar corrosion, the issue involves the use of salt, cities and states that use salt in the winter on the roads, the salt provides the corrosion path and negates the alkalinity resulting in corrosion way ahead of schedule. The salt on the road moves through the environment and affects lots of ancillary structures including nearby buildings and tunnels. Black-bar re-bar used in concrete where salt isn't applied, even underwater and in freeze/thaw cycles has been very durable. There is reinforced concrete out there that is still in perfect shape that was poured 50 years ago and it's harder than ever.

      Also, all concrete sets underwater, concrete doesn't dry, it hardens, it is a chemical reaction that involves hydration and the formation of a crystalline structure using the water. Without water there isn't concrete or if you allow the concrete to "dry" before it sets will degrade the concrete severely. This is why they have to keep the concrete moist for several days after pouring. Premature drying has similar symptoms to over-finishing, the surface of the concrete spalls the top surface off after a time rusulting in the loss of about a 1/4 - 1 inch of concrete on the surface spalling off.

      And finally, organic additives to concrete are NEVER a good thing. Organics deteriorate after time, this leaves voids in the concrete where the organics ended up and the decay can create acids and bases that can adversely affect the concrete. Organics are bad, period. Now, Roman use of organics, such as blood may have resulted in more air-entrainment. The little tiny air-bubbles formed after the organics decayed (or as a result of mixing them in) would have provided freeze-thaw protection. Concrete placed in the open weather typically needs ~5% air entrainment to eliminate the effect of water saturation and freeze/thaw cycles. The heavy use of

    2. Re:Strong doesn't mean good, and rebar as a flaw by klui · · Score: 1

      I made the mistake of using hot water to soak a blood stained cloth and now the stain will not come out. My wife told me that cold water should be used to wash it because hot water will cook the protein in the blood. Now the stain--not bright red, but much faded but is still visible--is in the form of a crusty texture. Maybe blood can act as a binding agent or something like that and the curing concrete is used to cook it?

    3. Re:Strong doesn't mean good, and rebar as a flaw by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      Use hydrogen peroxide or hairspray, like Aquanet. Spray the hairspray on up close so it freezes off the stain. Works on ink, too.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    4. Re:Strong doesn't mean good, and rebar as a flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but can you give us any concrete examples?

    5. Re:Strong doesn't mean good, and rebar as a flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the rice have to be cooked to release the amylopectin? Or could you just throw it into a mortar recipe like sand? I ask because I'm in the process of building a cordwood building and this might have a bearing on what type of mortar mix I use?

  26. How is this a secret? by cmdotter · · Score: 1

    The use of rice flour in building chinese constructions is so well known that my old man (who is a bit of a greenie) has been playing with it for years!
    Yes, that's right, Rice Flour + Cement. It seems to be basically a lime replacement, which is a common additive to Portland Cement anyhow.

  27. Ancient Chinese Secret by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    ZOMG! Calgon!

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  28. So if sticky rice is so long lasting... by DrPeper · · Score: 1

    Why am I always hungry 2 hours after Chinese food or Japanese sushi??

    1. Re:So if sticky rice is so long lasting... by cheros · · Score: 1

      Because both don't use the glutenous rice that's referred to in the article.

      Any other questions, or shall I leave you to find some sticky rice? Hint: you are most likely going to find it in Thai restaurants, but only those that serve *real* Thai food instead of the Western surrogate..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    2. Re:So if sticky rice is so long lasting... by DrPeper · · Score: 1

      I was actually aware of the difference, I was just looking to provide some lighthearted humor in this terribly serious string of comments.

      But now that you mention Thai food... I once made the mistake of telling the waitress at a Thai restaurant that I like it hot and spicy, so I wanted my dish on the hot side. When I got my dish, that's when I realized that the Thai people have an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT concept of spicy hot! Now I only order medium.

    3. Re:So if sticky rice is so long lasting... by cheros · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, I know *exactly* what you mean. In NE Thailand, they think dynamite chillies aren't hot enough, so they roast them. Avoid..

      BTW, it's also a baaaad idea to be downwind from the fire where they are roasting it - it takes a good 40 minutes to stop coughing :-(..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  29. Timeline screwup by icegreentea · · Score: 1

    TFA says that the rice additive has been used since the Ming Dynasty... and then goes on to say 1500 years ago. Ming Dynasty ruled around 1500 AD. They got themselves a 1000 year discrepancy there. Would sure be nice if they were more accurate about what they meant.

  30. Re:Yeah, but 70s buildings are extraordinarily ugl by Alamais · · Score: 1

    Which is another thing. Concrete doesn't have to be ugly. So WTF are so many modern concrete buildings so god damned ugly?

    A reflection of the people who paid for them, and those who designed them. ...and the society that doesn't tear them down.

  31. LISA by JDmetro · · Score: 1

    LIME
    IRON
    SILICA
    ALUMINA

  32. So what's the exact recipe? by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    I follow the links and couldn't find anything about the exact recipe for concrete/mortar. Just that "the scientists prepared lime mortars with varying amounts of sticky rice and tested their performance compared to traditional lime mortar."

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    1. Re:So what's the exact recipe? by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      Here's the article which I imagine has the recipes and their strength characteristics. Anyone have a subscription to ACS? Otherwise it's $30.

      http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ar9001944

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  33. Hundreds of years? So what? by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Not that I am saying this rice idea is a bad one, but I am sitting in a house that is a hundred years old as I type this. Almost all of the buildings around me are the same age. The one next to the one I am in is ~250 years old and people live in it.

    Houses in Central Europe tend to last very long, though one or two world wars may have cut down the average a tad.

  34. Found the full text article. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    Full text article.

    As far as I could tell an addition of 3.0% sticky rice soup to standard mortar improved strength:

    there is not always a positive relation between the strength and the sticky rice content. The sticky rice component in moderation is helpful in the development of the strength of lime mortar, because its water retentivity favors the carbonation reaction of lime and the subsequent increase in mechanical strength.(45) However, organic matter in excess will work as a retarder and restrain the carbonization reaction(46) of lime mortar. Therefore, when there is a >3.0% sticky rice solution in the lime mortar, the development of the strength of lime mortar will be restrained.

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    1. Re:Found the full text article. by hellop2 · · Score: 1
      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?