i didn't rate it, but knowing that cities directly adjacent were actively encouraging their residents to do the very thing orange was prosecuting it's residents for doing, was informative AND interesting...
every news outlet that picked up this story posted the same penalties... (this is a very old story by the way...) it isn't about an individual being a douche, it's about media outlets in general being sensationalist because in the end it has been proven to be a more viable business model for distributing stories for profit.
i guess in your country "freedom" is translated as "freedom, as long as it isn't weird or an eyesore"... and why bother even trying to define "weird" or "eyesore" because i'm sure everyone agrees on that.......... right?
you can't legislate morality. you can't legislate neighborliness.
It's California. The entire state is full of crazy leftists and the people who didn't know any better who just came there from more sensible areas of the country.
sensible enough to generalize ideologies as members of a binary system. that's much crazier to me.
i was going to bring up the fingerprinting... i remember having it done in 1st grade... we all got ice cream cups when we finished... seemed like a fair trade at the time.
they told stories of abduction to justify it, but it was administered by street cops in uniform... if it was really for investigative use, and not to index new potential criminals, then why didn't detectives or school administrators take the prints? i don't remember much from those days, but that day certainly felt weird enough to remember it over 25 years later.
we certainly do need to vacuum out old, no longer necessary or relevant laws without waiting for them to be used to charge and try individuals in court.
well... you don't seem to understand when things are completely true, so i'm condescending to you by offering double truths. you are still oblivious. you are stupid.
What I said about Lieberman is not, it is my opinion, which you may disagree with and you may hate, but it was never a flamebait.
you think that something that exists in front of your eyes is unimaginable... perhaps you don't know what it means to be able to imagine something. if not, you were instigating argument... so again, you are pointing out exactly why you are wrong seemingly to prove why you think you aren't wrong. you are stupid.
please state all of the premises you are referencing and i will provide you with a circuit diagram showing your faults. my "logic" exists. yours doesn't.
you complained about spending... you also claim that it will never stop, and that you'll only vote people out AFTER they have been "spoiled" and the spending has already taken place.
if you can't see the fault in pointlessly complaining, then i assume your work does not involve thinking of any kind.
It would be better for you to have it done by voting
so where does complaining about spending on the internet fall into that? if the money is worthless, the spending is irrelevant. the inertia you claim exists is the same pressure i illustrated with a dam full of holes.
your point seems to be that the dam is sure to break, so there is no point trying to fix it, but we should still buy more and more paste to stick in the holes for a little while. then if someone points out how silly it is, rhetorically state the above as if it justifys everything.
you were the one who complained about spending... i provided the only solution to stop it.
imagine a dam full of holes... you are suggesting using a substance to plug the holes that decays. you don't assume the holes will only get worse as the demands on the dam increase? you can plug the spending forever by not letting it happen.
i meant genius sarcastically of course... i was going to spell it genious to imply that, but i thought you might be so stupid you'd point it out yourself and waste more of my time. you being stupid certainly is the crux of the problem, genious.
so i'm assuming that the fed took back all the pork money that the previous politicians earmarked... oh, they didn't?
then i'm assuming that all other corruption has stopped and these new politicians are somehow guaranteed to never do anything unethical in the future.... oh, they aren't?
Slashdot Mirror
the assumption of a society made ENTIRELY of criminals is the first step to justifying fascism. nothing could be more unamerican.
i seriously had to check if it was april 1st.
my method is even simpler, I don't drink.
so the only reason you don't drink is so you don't have a hangover?
i drink frequently and never have a hangover.... i guess my method is not being a pussy.
electrical connections.
i didn't rate it, but knowing that cities directly adjacent were actively encouraging their residents to do the very thing orange was prosecuting it's residents for doing, was informative AND interesting...
i guess in your country "freedom" is translated as "freedom, as long as it isn't weird or an eyesore"... and why bother even trying to define "weird" or "eyesore" because i'm sure everyone agrees on that.......... right?
you can't legislate morality. you can't legislate neighborliness.
It's California. The entire state is full of crazy leftists and the people who didn't know any better who just came there from more sensible areas of the country.
sensible enough to generalize ideologies as members of a binary system. that's much crazier to me.
what is the point of a conversation without instigating an argument?
you are stupid.
they told stories of abduction to justify it, but it was administered by street cops in uniform... if it was really for investigative use, and not to index new potential criminals, then why didn't detectives or school administrators take the prints? i don't remember much from those days, but that day certainly felt weird enough to remember it over 25 years later.
we certainly do need to vacuum out old, no longer necessary or relevant laws without waiting for them to be used to charge and try individuals in court.
someone snatch up the black and white movie rights.
"maybe" != "may be" != "might be"
genious.
also, "maybe""may be""might be".
stupid.
FLAMEBAIT
genious.
well... you don't seem to understand when things are completely true, so i'm condescending to you by offering double truths. you are still oblivious. you are stupid.
you were not happy with that as you just like to complain. you are stupid.
What I said about Lieberman is not, it is my opinion, which you may disagree with and you may hate, but it was never a flamebait.
you think that something that exists in front of your eyes is unimaginable... perhaps you don't know what it means to be able to imagine something. if not, you were instigating argument... so again, you are pointing out exactly why you are wrong seemingly to prove why you think you aren't wrong. you are stupid.
you are completely and totally wrong.
please state all of the premises you are referencing and i will provide you with a circuit diagram showing your faults. my "logic" exists. yours doesn't.
if you can't see the fault in pointlessly complaining, then i assume your work does not involve thinking of any kind.
It would be better for you to have it done by voting
so where does complaining about spending on the internet fall into that? if the money is worthless, the spending is irrelevant. the inertia you claim exists is the same pressure i illustrated with a dam full of holes.
your point seems to be that the dam is sure to break, so there is no point trying to fix it, but we should still buy more and more paste to stick in the holes for a little while. then if someone points out how silly it is, rhetorically state the above as if it justifys everything.
the pure definition of flamebait...
so the real issue is you.
The rest of your post is nonsense and non-sequitur since it never follows the premises, which are wrong in themselves.
DURRRR. that's the point, genious. if they are wrong, you are wrong.
imagine a dam full of holes... you are suggesting using a substance to plug the holes that decays. you don't assume the holes will only get worse as the demands on the dam increase? you can plug the spending forever by not letting it happen.
i meant genius sarcastically of course... i was going to spell it genious to imply that, but i thought you might be so stupid you'd point it out yourself and waste more of my time. you being stupid certainly is the crux of the problem, genious.
then i'm assuming that all other corruption has stopped and these new politicians are somehow guaranteed to never do anything unethical in the future.... oh, they aren't?
is that your definition of fixed?