Old ideas don't mean bad ideas, especially in tems of plot. Will S. stole most of his plot ideas and yet i love to watch his comedies.
I thought that the battery idea was laughable, but really unimportant. I also thought that he moved far too well for someone in a cocoon. So what? I loved the ideas and the look and the plot. If they had left off explaining why the humans were cocooned, it would have been a better movie. It was still great.
I also thought that the lack of mechanism for his transformation was a bonus not a problem.
I was kicked out of the college I first attended because it was easier to label me insane that admit a rich jock could be doing something bad. I was stalked by a football player back before the term stalking was used. I feared for my safety. I complained and was told that I was making it up and must be insane. I was kicked out and lost everything because I persisted in my allegations.
These attitudes are everywhere and need to change.
BTW: Now, I have a paper stating i am sane amd 2 degrees. They were wrong but will never have to face any consequences.
Well, if their advertising is geared to males, i will assume their service is and take my buck elsewhere. I will not buy into the excuse that just because most of the market is male the advertising will be geared that way. It would be too easy to do the other too. Or choose an add that had nothing to do with sex.
This is especially nasty because this advertisig brings gender focus where gender really doesn't matter. Why bring it in at all and chance losing some market share? It gives me the message that women's business is not important to Red Hat or LinuxCare.
I am a female geek trying to decide which distro to go with. If i saw that simply supported ad and thought Red Hat approved, i would not choose Red Hat. I certainly would not use the services of a company that advertised that way. Not unless they had a hunk in a jock strap ads too:-)
According to one source the court published the descision on the web and included information that under current law is not for export. If the Supreme Court were silly enough to uphold current law, could the 9th court be prosecuted?
We can speak out and start teaching children at an early age that ridiculing people who are different is wrong.
I was a new kid in the middle of the first grade. the first teacher I had at that school thought learning to get along and fit in was part of growing up. Instead of stepping in when the kids started to tease the new kid, she let them. She let them get away with it even when I told her they were hitting me. She said if I would just ignore them they would stop. She told me not to be a tattletale and a crybaby. Her inaction taught them that their actions were ok.
I was tortured over the next 3 years until I moved out of that school. They got away with it because they were many and I was alone. That teacher had an opportunity to prevent at least some of that, but felt the lesson I needed, to learn how to fit in, was more important.
This week I have talked to people who echoed her sentiments. I think such attitudes are very much part of the problem. It is not always possible to make your tormenters stop without help. I was told to ignore them and they will go away. Ignoring them did not make them go away. Instead of growing bored with a captive who did not scream, they hit me harder and tried more severe tortures until I screamed. Instead of me learning to fit in, they learned how to torment.
We can reach out to those young people we know on the net, welcome the teen geeks to our groups--from linux users groups to our weekly D&D game. We can talk to them online and let them know that life gets better, but we need to teach the others what they are doing is wrong.
I know a girl in junior high who was part of an after school activity. I will call her Ashely. The other girls in the activity took to ostracizing Ashely. She rode in a carpool every day with these girls and Ashely's mother saw how terrible they treated her but knew if she spoke up she would only make it worse. Ashely's mother asked her if she would rather not carpool and the Ashely agreed. That way she could avoid 2 hours of torment each day and be better prepared to deal with the morons and be better able to focus on the activity.
The other girls' mothers strongly criticized Ashely's mother for this! They said that Ashely's mother was being over protective and that Ashely would never learn to be normal if she were allowed to run away from her problems. What a load. But I was told similar things when I grew up. I was told when I tried to avoid the worst situations that I was just running away and that I would never get anywhere if I did not learn to deal with things where I was. I was told that I would have problems all my life unless I just stuck in and learned to take it. It is as if there is never any situation terrible enough that society feels teenagers should not be forced to endure.
This is terrible. If I am treated badly at a workplace, I go through normal channels and if they fail me I can sue or try to change jobs. So far, I have changed jobs once because of intolerable conditions. The pay increase this lead to was quite nice. I have also used normal channels to get one co-worker to change his assinine behavior. This worked quite nicely.
Teens have no choice and often there are no normal channels that they can use to effect change. They are just told to learn to fit in and to just take it. They are blamed for the ridicule they receive.
I don't see it as surprising that a few teens decided to repay a school for its tormenting of them. I neither find the killings acceptable nor do I sypathize with the killers. I do understand the conditions that lead to their hate and think that unless we change things, it will happen again someplace else.
Taking away the steam valves like games, and isolating teens by removing thier internet access are not ways to help them and prevent another tragedy. Neither will threatening teens who speak out. If only the TCM had spoken out and someone LISTENED then this could be have been avoided.
I would very much like GEB in cd form. I often turn back to look something up in it. It would be especially nice if they included the music. Too bad they won't. It is a real loss. Not to mention that a cd might make it more accessible to disabled users.
Well, as far as help, I don't need it now. I made it. Soon after I graduated, I left home never to return. Now, I am 30. I have been married 10 years, have a good job in IT, a couple of degrees, and many good friends. I am happy now. I don't know how my tormenters fared, because I live far from where I went to high school. I was very lucky to make it through at all though.
Actually for me larger schools were easier because I seemed to be able to find more friends at larger schools. Different stuck out more at smaller schools. I know because I moved around. As far as uniforms, well i have no experience so i will not comment.
As someone else here has stated, we need to reach out to young people who have been marginalized and let them know that life gets better, especially for nerds and geeks. Any one who tells a teenager "these are the best years of your life" should be corrected, firmly. They deserve a good kick in the teeth for saying that, but one thing we need to show young people is that violence is unacceptable even when richly deserved.
I have reached out to a few teens since then, both online and in real life, and have gained some good friends. In this way, by serving as a away to connect people who are otherwise alone, the internet can serve to make these tragedies less likely. This is not some selfless good deed on my part. I have found real friends. I don't pose as a mentor or counselor; I am just me. I get back too. Some of these disgruntled teens can really write:-)
High schools are places where different, unathletic kids are marginalized to the point that any opinions they express are dismissed. High school did a very good job of telling me that I did not matter at all. It did not matter that I had wonderful grades. It did not even matter that I did have a small but close group of friends.
I was humiliated repeatedly by those that were athletic and popular. I am sure each school has different little indignities that are visited upon unpopular kids. In my school, they denied simple dignities to me such as a place to sit and eat my lunch. If I tried to sit down and eat at a table first I was ridiculed and if I did not get up then I was literally pushed onto the floor. It did not matter which table either as there was a shortage at our school. They also set up pranks with me as the butt and used me as a punch line for jokes. They often stole my homework to copy it so that they could get better grades. If I complained to authorities, I was told to work on my social skills and not to be a tattletale. I fought back however I could,which amused them greatly. They made fun of my complete impotence to affect them.
But I was female. Society punishes males more for being powerless, impotent. As a female, I was trained and pressured to be less out spoken, nicer--especially because I was not pretty. I was told time and again just to take it, not make waves. I was told that I could not afford those qualities because I was already not attractive and unpopular--being outspoken as well was just antagonizing people.
I don't think that we encourage young white males just to accept impotence. I think we instill in them the American feeling that "you too can be president" and "you can make a difference" and "you matter--speak and be heard." Must be quite a shock for these boys to find out in high school that they have suddenly been marginalized as well. It is quite the double bind for them.
I don't know what triggers the violence. I do know that when you place people in double bind situations you get irrational behavior.
I was there, in the 3rd row. The audience was enthusiastic, there were a couple of attempts at the wave before the whole thing started. They did give him quite a standing ovation when he was introduced.
He did bring 2 darling children, one cried for a short time, but not constantly like the kid that i swear always sits behind me in airplanes.
The meeting was moved from the original hall to a larger room and the room was still packed. It seemed like that there were a lot of press there. The number of questions from the audience was amazing. It as much like a press conference in that respect.
The jokes were funny. I thought so and so did the audience. The first time the lights went out was just as he said that Linux was used even in nuclear power plants. Then he said "not the one controling those though."
I was lucky enough to get an autograph. He was very graciously signing them while protesting he really did need to make his next appointment.
I'll be damned if I get it...
on
Quickielanche
·
· Score: 1
Check out www.spinnwebe.com for more Family Circus inspired comments.
You are almost right, but for paradise you need Pizza, Thai, and chinese food delivered to the door. Some would even argue dominos is not truely pizza . . .
Actually, the laws are gender neutral here, so a woman is just as liable if she does not gain consent.
Note i said that explicit verbal consent should be gained immediatly prior to the act in an initial sexual encounter. I did not say this was the law, it was my reccomendation. Surveys show many men who don't see themselves as rapists use force to get sex. I don't see how it is too much to actually get verbal acknowledgement that the first time you have sex that what you are about to do is what your partner expects. Done correctly this could be romantic and/or sexy.
The law just says a lack of resistance does not constitute consent. It does not specify what does.
I presented a paper in college about rape. One of my conclusions was that the standard for consent on initial sexual encounters should be explicit verbal consent just prior to the act. In other words, ask and get a straight answer before having sex for the first time. I came to this conclusion partly because some rapists do not seem to think using a little force to get sex was rape.
The room full of college guys shouted me down and told me that was too much to ask of them, that i was being silly. It seemed like common sense to me; my state has some good laws concerning rape, including that a lack of resistance does not constitute consent. It seems to me that explicit verbal consent was a good idea, for their sake, just to be sure they were within the law.
The laws in my state were revised not too long ago and don't have some of the nastiness that many older rape laws do. Laws alone won't change things, attitudes must change, and that is not easily done.
There are lot of quite charming men IRL that turn out to be rapist. They get away with it often because they are charming and if people know that the victim responded to intial advances, such as consented to go out with or meet the person, then people say, all too often, that is not really rape. No matter what the truth is.
The way the internet differs from real life is threefold.
1)It is easier to fake being nice, but rather that it can make it easier to lie about somethings like age, sex, income, etc.
2)It makes it easier for a predator to hunt because it makes a wide variety of victims available. The predator can select victims that are particularly vulnerable and suited to his tastes so that he has fewer surprises and can find what he wants more easily.
3) Once a victim is targeted the predator can use the excuse of distance to lure his victim to a location that gives the predator an advantage.
I have been waiting for him to do another series. Why the Simpsons are very good, better than most television surely, I think that his "Life in Hell" comic is better. I hope that this program will let us see some of the aspects of his humor not as prominent in the Simpsons.
Perhaps you could place a total number of comments, as well as the total number of shown comments at the base of the article. That way users can tell what number of comments they don't see. I would like this, because if my normal access reveals 10 out of 200, maybe i might decide to change the level. Also some stories have quite amuzing low level debates. This could clue me into that if there is an unusual number of unshown comments.
yes, they even gave me a free copy of the King James Version of the Holy Bible. It was delivered by 2 nice young men who have never contacted me again without my explicit consent, and the did not sell my name and other info like some do.
Libraries are not there to babysit anyone. Common sense or no, it is none of their business. Before I was able to afford my own computer and internet access after college, I paid a fee and used the local library's computers. Just because I could not, or would not, pay for my own access doesn't mean that they have a right suddenly to regulate all information i get there based on what they feel is in my best interest. Some ppl here seem to think that the library is for intellectual, erudite pursuits, but if you look at the collection of books in most local libraries you will find many books that are not very erudite. A good library has books which its patrons wish to read, not just what they should read. Why should the webpages available from library computers be any different?
Personally, i do look up medical information on the web, AND IN LIBRARY BOOKS. I do not use it to substitute for a doctor. Before a surgery I looked up what the doctor said was the problem and was able to not only confirm what he had told me but also to understand how he had come to that conclusion. I felt much better about the surgery which did solve the problem.
I did the same after another doctor visit and after reading several articles and not improving after a week, decided to get a second opinion. My doctor in that case got angry and refused even to recommend another for a second opinion. I am glad I saw someone else. Following the second doctor's advice, I quickly got better.
It is not always possible to ask all of my questions to the doctor when I am there. I think of things later, or just want to find out more. There are a lot of sites with solid information on the web.
Free Health Clinic's indeed! It is my body, my brain, and I will do as I please within the bounds of the law. The point of all of this is that the US Constitution as interpreted by the US Supreme Court says that libraries cannot censor adult access to the web!
I bet you would not like my opinion on what people should not read any more than i like yours. That is one reason the US Constitution has a bill of rights.
Slashdot Mirror
Old ideas don't mean bad ideas, especially in tems of plot. Will S. stole most of his plot ideas and yet i love to watch his comedies.
I thought that the battery idea was laughable, but really unimportant. I also thought that he moved far too well for someone in a cocoon. So what? I loved the ideas and the look and the plot. If they had left off explaining why the humans were cocooned, it would have been a better movie. It was still great.
I also thought that the lack of mechanism for his transformation was a bonus not a problem.
I was kicked out of the college I first attended because it was easier to label me insane that admit a rich jock could be doing something bad. I was stalked by a football player back before the term stalking was used. I feared for my safety. I complained and was told that I was making it up and must be insane. I was kicked out and lost everything because I persisted in my allegations.
These attitudes are everywhere and need to change.
BTW: Now, I have a paper stating i am sane amd 2 degrees. They were wrong but will never have to face any consequences.
Well, if their advertising is geared to males, i will assume their service is and take my buck elsewhere. I will not buy into the excuse that just because most of the market is male the advertising will be geared that way. It would be too easy to do the other too. Or choose an add that had nothing to do with sex.
This is especially nasty because this advertisig brings gender focus where gender really doesn't matter. Why bring it in at all and chance losing some market share? It gives me the message that women's business is not important to Red Hat or LinuxCare.
I am a female geek trying to decide which distro to go with. If i saw that simply supported ad and thought Red Hat approved, i would not choose Red Hat. I certainly would not use the services of a company that advertised that way. Not unless they had a hunk in a jock strap ads too :-)
Red Hat has every right to say STOP THAT.
According to one source the court published the descision on the web and included information that under current law is not for export. If the Supreme Court were silly enough to uphold current law, could the 9th court be prosecuted?
We can speak out and start teaching children at an early age that ridiculing people who are different is wrong.
I was a new kid in the middle of the first grade. the first teacher I had at that school thought learning to get along and fit in was part of growing up. Instead of stepping in when the kids started to tease the new kid, she let them. She let them get away with it even when I told her they were hitting me. She said if I would just ignore them they would stop. She told me not to be a tattletale and a crybaby. Her inaction taught them that their actions were ok.
I was tortured over the next 3 years until I moved out of that school. They got away with it because they were many and I was alone. That teacher had an opportunity to prevent at least some of that, but felt the lesson I needed, to learn how to fit in, was more important.
This week I have talked to people who echoed her sentiments. I think such attitudes are very much part of the problem. It is not always possible to make your tormenters stop without help. I was told to ignore them and they will go away. Ignoring them did not make them go away. Instead of growing bored with a captive who did not scream, they hit me harder and tried more severe tortures until I screamed. Instead of me learning to fit in, they learned how to torment.
We can reach out to those young people we know on the net, welcome the teen geeks to our groups--from linux users groups to our weekly D&D game. We can talk to them online and let them know that life gets better, but we need to teach the others what they are doing is wrong.
I know a girl in junior high who was part of an after school activity. I will call her Ashely. The other girls in the activity took to ostracizing Ashely. She rode in a carpool every day with these girls and Ashely's mother saw how terrible they treated her but knew if she spoke up she would only make it worse. Ashely's mother asked her if she would rather not carpool and the Ashely agreed. That way she could avoid 2 hours of torment each day and be better prepared to deal with the morons and be better able to focus on the activity.
The other girls' mothers strongly criticized Ashely's mother for this! They said that Ashely's mother was being over protective and that Ashely would never learn to be normal if she were allowed to run away from her problems. What a load. But I was told similar things when I grew up. I was told when I tried to avoid the worst situations that I was just running away and that I would never get anywhere if I did not learn to deal with things where I was. I was told that I would have problems all my life unless I just stuck in and learned to take it. It is as if there is never any situation terrible enough that society feels teenagers should not be forced to endure.
This is terrible. If I am treated badly at a workplace, I go through normal channels and if they fail me I can sue or try to change jobs. So far, I have changed jobs once because of intolerable conditions. The pay increase this lead to was quite nice. I have also used normal channels to get one co-worker to change his assinine behavior. This worked quite nicely.
Teens have no choice and often there are no normal channels that they can use to effect change. They are just told to learn to fit in and to just take it. They are blamed for the ridicule they receive.
I don't see it as surprising that a few teens decided to repay a school for its tormenting of them. I neither find the killings acceptable nor do I sypathize with the killers. I do understand the conditions that lead to their hate and think that unless we change things, it will happen again someplace else.
Taking away the steam valves like games, and isolating teens by removing thier internet access are not ways to help them and prevent another tragedy. Neither will threatening teens who speak out. If only the TCM had spoken out and someone LISTENED then this could be have been avoided.
I would very much like GEB in cd form. I often turn back to look something up in it. It would be especially nice if they included the music. Too bad they won't. It is a real loss. Not to mention that a cd might make it more accessible to disabled users.
Well, as far as help, I don't need it now. I made it. Soon after I graduated, I left home never to return. Now, I am 30. I have been married 10 years, have a good job in IT, a couple of degrees, and many good friends. I am happy now. I don't know how my tormenters fared, because I live far from where I went to high school. I was very lucky to make it through at all though.
:-)
Actually for me larger schools were easier because I seemed to be able to find more friends at larger schools. Different stuck out more at smaller schools. I know because I moved around. As far as uniforms, well i have no experience so i will not comment.
As someone else here has stated, we need to reach out to young people who have been marginalized and let them know that life gets better, especially for nerds and geeks. Any one who tells a teenager "these are the best years of your life" should be corrected, firmly. They deserve a good kick in the teeth for saying that, but one thing we need to show young people is that violence is unacceptable even when richly deserved.
I have reached out to a few teens since then, both online and in real life, and have gained some good friends. In this way, by serving as a away to connect people who are otherwise alone, the internet can serve to make these tragedies less likely. This is not some selfless good deed on my part. I have found real friends. I don't pose as a mentor or counselor; I am just me. I get back too. Some of these disgruntled teens can really write
They have been sneaking in video cameras for years, it was even on Seinfeld. the only new aspect is the net and campus involvement.
High schools are places where different, unathletic kids are marginalized to the point that any opinions they express are dismissed. High school did a very good job of telling me that I did not matter at all. It did not matter that I had wonderful grades. It did not even matter that I did have a small but close group of friends.
I was humiliated repeatedly by those that were athletic and popular. I am sure each school has different little indignities that are visited upon unpopular kids. In my school, they denied simple dignities to me such as a place to sit and eat my lunch. If I tried to sit down and eat at a table first I was ridiculed and if I did not get up then I was literally pushed onto the floor. It did not matter which table either as there was a shortage at our school. They also set up pranks with me as the butt and used me as a punch line for jokes. They often stole my homework to copy it so that they could get better grades. If I complained to authorities, I was told to work on my social skills and not to be a tattletale. I fought back however I could,which amused them greatly. They made fun of my complete impotence to affect them.
But I was female. Society punishes males more for being powerless, impotent. As a female, I was trained and pressured to be less out spoken, nicer--especially because I was not pretty. I was told time and again just to take it, not make waves. I was told that I could not afford those qualities because I was already not attractive and unpopular--being outspoken as well was just antagonizing people.
I don't think that we encourage young white males just to accept impotence. I think we instill in them the American feeling that "you too can be president" and "you can make a difference" and "you matter--speak and be heard." Must be quite a shock for these boys to find out in high school that they have suddenly been marginalized as well. It is quite the double bind for them.
I don't know what triggers the violence. I do know that when you place people in double bind situations you get irrational behavior.
The room's capacity is +800. There was SRO and ppl spilled out all the doors. I thnk the number of ppl there was closer to 1000.
I was there, in the 3rd row. The audience was enthusiastic, there were a couple of attempts at the wave before the whole thing started. They did give him quite a standing ovation when he was introduced.
He did bring 2 darling children, one cried for a short time, but not constantly like the kid that i swear always sits behind me in airplanes.
The meeting was moved from the original hall to a larger room and the room was still packed. It seemed like that there were a lot of press there. The number of questions from the audience was amazing. It as much like a press conference in that respect.
The jokes were funny. I thought so and so did the audience. The first time the lights went out was just as he said that Linux was used even in nuclear power plants. Then he said "not
the one controling those though."
I was lucky enough to get an autograph. He was very graciously signing them while protesting he really did need to make his next appointment.
Check out www.spinnwebe.com for more Family Circus inspired comments.
You are almost right, but for paradise you need Pizza, Thai, and chinese food delivered to the door. Some would even argue dominos is not truely pizza . . .
I would hate someone to get a pass and not be able to get there because they could not arrange transportation or time off.
:-)
I have both taken care of
:-) ;-}
I think the sequel to those pages should be chocolate rabbit experiments
Actually, the laws are gender neutral here, so a woman is just as liable if she does not gain consent.
Note i said that explicit verbal consent should be gained immediatly prior to the act in an initial sexual encounter. I did not say this was the law, it was my reccomendation. Surveys show many men who don't see themselves as rapists use force to get sex. I don't see how it is too much to actually get verbal acknowledgement that the first time you have sex that what you are about to do is what your partner expects. Done correctly this could be romantic and/or sexy.
The law just says a lack of resistance does not constitute consent. It does not specify what does.
I presented a paper in college about rape. One of my conclusions was that the standard for consent on initial sexual encounters should be explicit verbal consent just prior to the act. In other words, ask and get a straight answer before having sex for the first time. I came to this conclusion partly because some rapists do not seem to think using a little force to get sex was rape.
The room full of college guys shouted me down and told me that was too much to ask of them, that i was being silly. It seemed like common sense to me; my state has some good laws concerning rape, including that a lack of resistance does not constitute consent. It seems to me that explicit verbal consent was a good idea, for their sake, just to be sure they were within the law.
The laws in my state were revised not too long ago and don't have some of the nastiness that many older rape laws do. Laws alone won't change things, attitudes must change, and that is not easily done.
There are lot of quite charming men IRL that turn out to be rapist. They get away with it often because they are charming and if people know that the victim responded to intial advances, such as consented to go out with or meet the person, then people say, all too often, that is not really rape. No matter what the truth is.
The way the internet differs from real life is threefold.
1)It is easier to fake being nice, but rather that it can make it easier to lie about somethings like age, sex, income, etc.
2)It makes it easier for a predator to hunt because it makes a wide variety of victims available. The predator can select victims that are particularly vulnerable and suited to his tastes so that he has fewer surprises and can find what he wants more easily.
3) Once a victim is targeted the predator can use the excuse of distance to lure his victim to a location that gives the predator an advantage.
I have been waiting for him to do another series. Why the Simpsons are very good, better than most television surely, I think that his "Life in Hell" comic is better. I hope that this program will let us see some of the aspects of his humor not as prominent in the Simpsons.
I remember a work of fiction about a society with universal, government sponsored, high bandwith two-way communication. Scary.
Perhaps you could place a total number of comments, as well as the total number of shown comments at the base of the article. That way users can tell what number of comments they don't see. I would like this, because if my normal access reveals 10 out of 200, maybe i might decide to change the level. Also some stories have quite amuzing low level debates. This could clue me into that if there is an unusual number of unshown comments.
yes, they even gave me a free copy of the King James Version of the Holy Bible. It was delivered by 2 nice young men who have never contacted me again without my explicit consent, and the did not sell my name and other info like some do.
Libraries are not there to babysit anyone. Common sense or no, it is none of their business.
Before I was able to afford my own computer and internet access after college, I paid a fee and used the local library's computers. Just because I could not, or would not, pay for my own access doesn't mean that they have a right suddenly to regulate all information i get there based on what they feel is in my best interest. Some ppl here seem to think that the library is for intellectual, erudite pursuits, but if you look at the collection of books in most local libraries you will find many books that are not very erudite. A good library has books which its patrons wish to read, not just what they should read. Why should the webpages available from library computers be any different?
Personally, i do look up medical information on the web, AND IN LIBRARY BOOKS. I do not use it to substitute for a doctor. Before a surgery I looked up what the doctor said was the problem and was able to not only confirm what he had told me but also to understand how he had come to that conclusion. I felt much better about the surgery which did solve the problem.
I did the same after another doctor visit and after reading several articles and not improving after a week, decided to get a second opinion. My doctor in that case got angry and refused even to recommend another for a second opinion. I am glad I saw someone else. Following the second doctor's advice, I quickly got better.
It is not always possible to ask all of my questions to the doctor when I am there. I think of things later, or just want to find out more. There are a lot of sites with solid information on the web.
Free Health Clinic's indeed! It is my body, my brain, and I will do as I please within the bounds of the law. The point of all of this is that the US Constitution as interpreted by the US Supreme Court says that libraries cannot censor adult access to the web!
I bet you would not like my opinion on what people should not read any more than i like yours. That is one reason the US Constitution has a bill of rights.