One more thing I forgot to say. The Jewish reaction to the Holocaust was not to get a few lawyers together and work for a better United Nations. Rather it was to start the process of galvanizing support among the remaining European Jews for Zionism. The reaction was not the Geneva Convention to protect Jews. Jews had seen international conventions protecting them be ignored many times over the last 1900 years. Rather the reaction was to form a Jewish army and stop being a stateless minority. The mass migration to Palestine had the support of European Jewry after WWII.
And to a great extent the success of the Zionist project then caused a nationalist surge in the other major bodies of Jews. The mainstream Jewish political philosophy of a century ago looks nothing like it does today. Circumstances changed ideology.
When I grew up, people used to say, "How could the world stand by silently when Jews were being killed?"
I gave you the facts regarding the Holocaust comparison. You are simply ignoring them and responding with "bad stuff happened in both places". The Warsaw ghetto was part of a program that was almost uniquely bad. The Palestinians in Gaza are experiencing losing wars and on the scale of what happens to people who start wars with superior powers is rather humane. Both things are bad. But you simply lack any ability to make moral arguments when you sit there and lie about the facts via. making a comparison which is wholly inaccurate for shock value. If you have read about the holocaust you wouldn't be making the comparison.
As for the world, the world didn't stand by silently when the Jews were destroyed. The world protested mildly. The world wasn't going to do much about it but they certainly were willing to tsk-tsk Hitler and the Nazis over it. Which is the same thing that happens other minorities are destroyed. The world tsk-tsked over Tibet. The world tsk-tsked over the Guatemalan civil war. The world tsk-tsks over North Korea. The world tsk-tsked over East Timor. and so on again and again and again. Your little vow to never let it happen again to anyone was a total failure. But of course you don't give a crap about the victims or you would be focusing on things like North Korea. The issue is the perpetrators. It offends your moral sensibility to learn that when Judaism decided to stop being the ghost of Judea and return to being a living breathing nation it went back to farting, having bad breath and sneezing. "Oh it was so much more refined as a ghost". Nations are born in blood. Get over it. Israel will do what any nation does when its existence is threatened. Israel is not going to allow the Palestinians to establish a hostile state.
I've been to Israel. The Palestinians could make great Israelis. But they didn't go down the path of integration and instead have gone down the path of a century long struggle against the Jews losing war after war after war. After 1936-9 they should have just accepted defeat and admitted the new society arising in mandate Palestine was going to be Israel not Palestine and become part of it, the same way my great grandparents became part of America. But instead they keep fighting pointless in the name of their dead society. I don't like that they are destroying themselves by putting their hand and then arm over and over and over again into the blades of a lawnmower believing that somehow they will convince the lawnmower to give up. But I don't blame the lawnmower. The Greeks knew that the elpis (expectation of help from Zeus) was the worst of all tragedy to befall men. The Palestinians unfortunately believe that their situation will change magically rather than accepting that if they want to live in the Palestinian territory they will need to do so as Israelis.
I don't think Gaza declared a state of war,
Electing a party whose primary platform is "armed resistance" and then immediately engaging in it. Again you really need to work on your honesty.
I saw the Israelis brag about the inadequate food they were supplying
This is a lie. Israel restricts dual usage materials. Almost all usage is not dual usage.
After WWII, a movement of international lawyers -- led in large part by Jewish lawyers, motivated by the example of the Nazi crimes -- wrote a body of law to make these activities illegal. Those were codified in the Geneva Conventions and other international laws.
First off by definition a law requires an enforcing power. If a power is unable to enforce it has opinions it doesn’t make law.
Second your history is wrong. International agreements on peace became popular in response to the death toll in the Napoleonic wars.
The blockade is a response to a coup by a government with a declared policy of not respecting the border with Israel. The original claim was that the Palestinians wanted peace but the settlement enterprise... Gaza shows that's not true. With no settlement enterprise they still refuse to just live in Gaza.
It reminds a lot of Jews, including me, of the Warsaw Ghetto.
Between 1940 when it was established and mid-1942 when the uprising started the 1,125 calories a day allocation caused over 1/5th of the population of the Warsaw Ghetto to starve to death. When the first uprising happened the Germans killed another 10% of the population within 3 months are exported the remaining population to death camps.
In Gaza the death toll from multiple uprisings is around 1/4%. The starvation is not remotely similar. It is an obscenity to compare the Warsaw Ghetto to If you are a Jew, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for saying something like that.
Gaza is surrounded on all sides by a blockade which doesn't allow them to import or export any significant goods, or leave and come back to a university, for example.
Gaza has declared a state of war. The parent asserted that the Palestinians were interested in peace but the settlement enterprise prevented it. Gaza has no settlement enterprise.
If that's true, then logically, the Israeli government is responsible for the illegal land grabs and killings by the settlers [in the West Bank], for example
I don't know how something that the operating government permits can be "illegal" but of course the Israeli government is responsible for the settlement enterprise. The population of Israel are the ones doing it. Israeli infrastructure connects to it. Israel subsidies it. The Israeli army protects it. Who should be responsible the Martians?
Israel would also be responsible for the illegal killings of civilians during the Gaza wars, including the "white flag" incidents where Israeli soldiers killed Palestinians, including children, who came out carrying a white flag as ordered (documented in the Goldstone report)
Assuming this happened, which soldiers did it? To prosecute someone you need to prove their guilt. Some people tossed rocks and molotov cocktails at police during the St. Louis riots most weren't prosecuted because we don't know who did it.
Certainly ISIS terrorism (violence against civilians in conquered areas) is one of their primary means of establishing control, while the Yishuv had wider popular support. But given all their other activities I wouldn't say ISIS is just terrorism either.
So what? If Israel allowed the West Bank Palestinians to vote on whether to leave or not, then they would be willing to live in peace? Is that what you are saying? Doesn't Gaza and the problems Israel had in the 50s-70s with Palestinians in foreign countries disprove that?
Your description is accurate except for Jerusalem. Non-Jews with Jerusalem residency are entitled to Israeli citizenship or Jordanian citizenship. They can choose. Many Palestinians until recently felt that accepting Israeli citizenship was accepting the Israeli annexation of Jerusalem and refused to become citizens. Lately (the last 5 years or so) that attitude has started to change and roughly 3-5% of Palestinians are becoming Israeli per year. In a generation the majority of Palestinians in Jerusalem will be Israeli citizens.
You also should make clear that while it certainly is true that West Bank Palestinians live under a military dictatorship that's partially their fault. They have refused to accept a benign colonial relationship with Israel and instead want to be classified as a hostile occupation. Puerto Rico doesn't have the same problems that the West Bank does.
The Yisuv used a variety of tactics to get achieve their goal of an independent Jewish state, just like most national liberation movements do. They did make use of Terrorism but they also made use of agricultural development and cultural enrichment did so on a much wider scale and with a higher budget. It is simply dishonest to take one attribute of the Yishuv's methods and claim that they were "literally founded through terrorism".
Ariel Sharon was born in Kfar Malal, Palestine. Your problem is that you are a racist and don't believe that people should be citizens where they were born.
There are 0 Israelis who live in Gaza. There are 0 settlements in Gaza. All the Gazan Israeli wars of the last 10 years wars have been Gaza attacking Israel.
They tried taking the high road, the Gazans still won't accept living in Gaza and not Israel.
The reason for Israel to have them is they can use them if they start to lose a defensive war. The Israeli nation, don't believe they would survive the Israeli state losing a serious war. Hence strategic nuclear forces make sense as a defensive weapon for them.
Obviously there would be horrible political repercussions, but most stuff is better than death.
Countries aren't equal in their economic output and energy usage correlates with output per capita. Essentially this study says that non-advanced economies don't use much energy per capita. Well everyone knows that. To a great extent economic growth is all about boosting per capita energy consumption. Sustainable energy is all about trying to break the tie between energy usage and carbon emissions because of the tie between productivity and energy.
If you want to talk about some sort of energy debt a better unit might be something like CO2 emissions per unit of GDP.
I don't agree that was the situation by 2014 and earlier this year. I think by then the chain of dependencies was starting to form that was making things increasingly nasty.
a) There were loud objections to systemd which would normally cause Debian to back off b) The dependencies were making it clear that Jessie was the last Debian distribution that not tying onself to systemd and remaining a mainstream distribution would be viable for. So the question was really switch now or switch in 2.5 years when the switch would be even more painful.
I do agree with you on the interfaces last longer than cold post BTW. I think that while systemd is a huge plus. Replacing systemd say 20 years from now will be very difficult. Essentially the modules will each need to be reimplemented in a way that's backwards compatible, offers what the future features are and allows partial implementation. The kinds of problems say Microsoft, Apple, DEC or Sun had in pushing forward. I'm a fan of tight vertical integration but there certainly are counter arguments against it and for loose coupling.
.I worked with Linux-HA before systemd, and I of all the problems, I don't recall init scripts being one of them.
The problem isn't init scripts it is what to do with chains of dependencies on high availability. If you worked in Linux-HA think about the application specific restart code that each application had to do and how fragile it all was.
That's an interesting thought.......have you ever supported Oracle Financials or similar? Do you have experiences you can share?
I help people migrate to cloud. IaaS/PaaS is a godsend in getting complex application stacks working. I can offer experience there that what I'm finding is not that people want a lighter thinner init-system but they want an process manager which is capable of intelligently handling
resource orchestration, resource monitoring, resource provision and resource balancing virtual machines: backup, restart, status... storage virtualization: especially backup network virtualization continuous test continuous delivery especially decommissioning a security validation database monitoring....
They all want an much richer environment of management tools. In real life I've never met anyone who thinks systemd is too thick, they all argue it is too thin. The amount of time IT people spend worrying about basic things like messaging across security zones is infuriating to management. Mostly now that Linux is taking on the workloads of mainframes I'm finding most companies want Linux to offer the kinds of services you would find on mainframes (but more modern).
It was "just an init system" when it was made the init system in Debian "jessie", the most recent release.
No it wasn't. There was certainly an earlier debate about which init system which ended with Debian not having to make a choice. But the debate for Jessie was about systemd dependencies most of which were not tied to init.
Please justify your version of historical determinism.
Saying X happened for reason Y isn't historical determinism it is just an assertion about historical fact. This particular fact isn't even contested the people who did POSIX were quite openly doing it to advance open systems.
We know from innumerable examples that it isn't true; and we also know that since POSIX, the open system specification, won the war against vendorized UNIX
POSIX was for vendorized UNIX. POSIX advanced the proprietary Unixes. What killed them was NT and Linux, the advantages of x86 hardware mostly.
since POSIX there haven't been any successful closed systems
NT was after POSIX. OSX is a UNIX that came after POSIX.
That is very much an ad-hominem attack.
An ad-hominem attack is saying argument X is wrong because Y is a bad person. Saying Y gets treated badly because he's a bad person is not an ad-hominem attack. So saying that the anti-systemd people being jerks proves that systemd is a good idea would be ad-hominem saying the anti-systemd get ad-hominem attacks for lying and ignorance is not ad-hominem though it is not polite.
Besides, if they're such ignorant liars, couldn't you just point them at a FAQ and be done with it,
I've done so. I try that too when their are factual claims.
European carriers are often subsidized more heavily (like USA land carriers). The bigger problem is that Europe even sparse countries have more uniform density. America has a lot of suburbs and x-burbs where a huge percentage of the population live in moderate densities. Rural highway is easy (though expensive). The problem is what to do in lightly populated areas.
The OS kernel really do much to manage process and threads. Consider this example: A is a daemon which depends on B which depends on C. C encounters a problem and needs to restart. What should the system do about A? Linux prior to systemd lacked any standards for this and every daemon had to handle this sort of thing on its own on top of init.
Let's make it worse. Assume A is going to follow process B's lead and process B needs to know why C crashed to decide what to do. a) How does process B find out what happened to C? b) How does B find out whether C was able to resolve the problem on restart? c) How does A find out given that A and C don't directly touch?
The reason they wanted to do that was they started stripping clothes off people before killing them and wanted to be able to identify bodies for the records. This is well attested to historical fact. So asking that sort of question without quickly checking the answer implies either deliberate ignorance or dishonesty.
No it doesn't. Just talk about Israel the way you would talk about Myanmar. One doesn't conflate Tibetans in China with Burmese Tibetans in Myanmar even though they are close and support one another.
Avoid "blaming" anyone. This is a policy dispute it isn't about "blame". You disagree with policy X and want to see policy X changed. Once it goes beyond that, well then there is good reason it gets considered anti-Semitism.
I'm a fan of free speech. But the holocaust is well verified historical fact. There is no rational reason that a critic of Israel on policy grounds would need to have any opinion outside the norm on the holocaust. One can be critical of most other country's policies, even those with popular support within the country without having to make up fake history. The reason that anti-Zionism gets grouped with anti-Semitism is that anti-Zionism doesn't feel like a foreign policy debate but more like a religious debate.
Wrong. There is your mistake there. It is a process manager. It is not an init system.
Why binary logging? Who asked for that?
Log aggregation systems for well over a decade.
Why throw away POSIX
POSIX was the solution to the problem of Open Systems: how to be able to write software for a huge range of proprietary Unixes without needing extensive porting. We no longer have that problem the proprietary Unixes are almost all dead or dying.
Why the barrage of ad hominem attacks systemd critics?
Because mostly they are ignorant liars. They state untrue things and when the truth is explained to them they often continue. They have a much thinner range of experience with systems and often condescendingly talk about how no one did X and anyone who disagrees with them can't administer a system when in fact X was the norm and they don't know all that much about how system administration is being handled today. And to boot their tone is atrocious almost unhinged. Coming at this from a place of honest exploration would have helped.
Slashdot Mirror
One more thing I forgot to say. The Jewish reaction to the Holocaust was not to get a few lawyers together and work for a better United Nations. Rather it was to start the process of galvanizing support among the remaining European Jews for Zionism. The reaction was not the Geneva Convention to protect Jews. Jews had seen international conventions protecting them be ignored many times over the last 1900 years. Rather the reaction was to form a Jewish army and stop being a stateless minority. The mass migration to Palestine had the support of European Jewry after WWII.
And to a great extent the success of the Zionist project then caused a nationalist surge in the other major bodies of Jews. The mainstream Jewish political philosophy of a century ago looks nothing like it does today. Circumstances changed ideology.
I gave you the facts regarding the Holocaust comparison. You are simply ignoring them and responding with "bad stuff happened in both places". The Warsaw ghetto was part of a program that was almost uniquely bad. The Palestinians in Gaza are experiencing losing wars and on the scale of what happens to people who start wars with superior powers is rather humane. Both things are bad. But you simply lack any ability to make moral arguments when you sit there and lie about the facts via. making a comparison which is wholly inaccurate for shock value. If you have read about the holocaust you wouldn't be making the comparison.
As for the world, the world didn't stand by silently when the Jews were destroyed. The world protested mildly. The world wasn't going to do much about it but they certainly were willing to tsk-tsk Hitler and the Nazis over it. Which is the same thing that happens other minorities are destroyed.
The world tsk-tsked over Tibet.
The world tsk-tsked over the Guatemalan civil war.
The world tsk-tsks over North Korea.
The world tsk-tsked over East Timor.
and so on again and again and again.
Your little vow to never let it happen again to anyone was a total failure. But of course you don't give a crap about the victims or you would be focusing on things like North Korea. The issue is the perpetrators. It offends your moral sensibility to learn that when Judaism decided to stop being the ghost of Judea and return to being a living breathing nation it went back to farting, having bad breath and sneezing. "Oh it was so much more refined as a ghost". Nations are born in blood. Get over it. Israel will do what any nation does when its existence is threatened. Israel is not going to allow the Palestinians to establish a hostile state.
I've been to Israel. The Palestinians could make great Israelis. But they didn't go down the path of integration and instead have gone down the path of a century long struggle against the Jews losing war after war after war. After 1936-9 they should have just accepted defeat and admitted the new society arising in mandate Palestine was going to be Israel not Palestine and become part of it, the same way my great grandparents became part of America. But instead they keep fighting pointless in the name of their dead society. I don't like that they are destroying themselves by putting their hand and then arm over and over and over again into the blades of a lawnmower believing that somehow they will convince the lawnmower to give up. But I don't blame the lawnmower. The Greeks knew that the elpis (expectation of help from Zeus) was the worst of all tragedy to befall men. The Palestinians unfortunately believe that their situation will change magically rather than accepting that if they want to live in the Palestinian territory they will need to do so as Israelis.
Electing a party whose primary platform is "armed resistance" and then immediately engaging in it. Again you really need to work on your honesty.
This is a lie. Israel restricts dual usage materials. Almost all usage is not dual usage.
First off by definition a law requires an enforcing power. If a power is unable to enforce it has opinions it doesn’t make law.
Second your history is wrong. International agreements on peace became popular in response to the death toll in the Napoleonic wars.
The blockade is a response to a coup by a government with a declared policy of not respecting the border with Israel. The original claim was that the Palestinians wanted peace but the settlement enterprise... Gaza shows that's not true. With no settlement enterprise they still refuse to just live in Gaza.
Between 1940 when it was established and mid-1942 when the uprising started the 1,125 calories a day allocation caused over 1/5th of the population of the Warsaw Ghetto to starve to death. When the first uprising happened the Germans killed another 10% of the population within 3 months are exported the remaining population to death camps.
In Gaza the death toll from multiple uprisings is around 1/4%. The starvation is not remotely similar. It is an obscenity to compare the Warsaw Ghetto to If you are a Jew, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for saying something like that.
Gaza has declared a state of war. The parent asserted that the Palestinians were interested in peace but the settlement enterprise prevented it. Gaza has no settlement enterprise.
I don't know how something that the operating government permits can be "illegal" but of course the Israeli government is responsible for the settlement enterprise. The population of Israel are the ones doing it. Israeli infrastructure connects to it. Israel subsidies it. The Israeli army protects it. Who should be responsible the Martians?
Assuming this happened, which soldiers did it? To prosecute someone you need to prove their guilt. Some people tossed rocks and molotov cocktails at police during the St. Louis riots most weren't prosecuted because we don't know who did it.
I'm not talking Samson option. 'm talking nuclear weapons to avoid defeat. Samson option is mainly about what to do in the case of defeat.
Certainly ISIS terrorism (violence against civilians in conquered areas) is one of their primary means of establishing control, while the Yishuv had wider popular support. But given all their other activities I wouldn't say ISIS is just terrorism either.
So what? If Israel allowed the West Bank Palestinians to vote on whether to leave or not, then they would be willing to live in peace? Is that what you are saying? Doesn't Gaza and the problems Israel had in the 50s-70s with Palestinians in foreign countries disprove that?
Typical anti-Zionist. If you get contradicted on the facts rant louder.
Your description is accurate except for Jerusalem. Non-Jews with Jerusalem residency are entitled to Israeli citizenship or Jordanian citizenship. They can choose. Many Palestinians until recently felt that accepting Israeli citizenship was accepting the Israeli annexation of Jerusalem and refused to become citizens. Lately (the last 5 years or so) that attitude has started to change and roughly 3-5% of Palestinians are becoming Israeli per year. In a generation the majority of Palestinians in Jerusalem will be Israeli citizens.
You also should make clear that while it certainly is true that West Bank Palestinians live under a military dictatorship that's partially their fault. They have refused to accept a benign colonial relationship with Israel and instead want to be classified as a hostile occupation. Puerto Rico doesn't have the same problems that the West Bank does.
The Yisuv used a variety of tactics to get achieve their goal of an independent Jewish state, just like most national liberation movements do. They did make use of Terrorism but they also made use of agricultural development and cultural enrichment did so on a much wider scale and with a higher budget. It is simply dishonest to take one attribute of the Yishuv's methods and claim that they were "literally founded through terrorism".
Ariel Sharon was born in Kfar Malal, Palestine. Your problem is that you are a racist and don't believe that people should be citizens where they were born.
There are 0 Israelis who live in Gaza. There are 0 settlements in Gaza. All the Gazan Israeli wars of the last 10 years wars have been Gaza attacking Israel.
They tried taking the high road, the Gazans still won't accept living in Gaza and not Israel.
The reason for Israel to have them is they can use them if they start to lose a defensive war. The Israeli nation, don't believe they would survive the Israeli state losing a serious war. Hence strategic nuclear forces make sense as a defensive weapon for them.
Obviously there would be horrible political repercussions, but most stuff is better than death.
Countries aren't equal in their economic output and energy usage correlates with output per capita. Essentially this study says that non-advanced economies don't use much energy per capita. Well everyone knows that. To a great extent economic growth is all about boosting per capita energy consumption. Sustainable energy is all about trying to break the tie between energy usage and carbon emissions because of the tie between productivity and energy.
If you want to talk about some sort of energy debt a better unit might be something like CO2 emissions per unit of GDP.
I don't agree that was the situation by 2014 and earlier this year. I think by then the chain of dependencies was starting to form that was making things increasingly nasty.
a) There were loud objections to systemd which would normally cause Debian to back off
b) The dependencies were making it clear that Jessie was the last Debian distribution that not tying onself to systemd and remaining a mainstream distribution would be viable for. So the question was really switch now or switch in 2.5 years when the switch would be even more painful.
I do agree with you on the interfaces last longer than cold post BTW. I think that while systemd is a huge plus. Replacing systemd say 20 years from now will be very difficult. Essentially the modules will each need to be reimplemented in a way that's backwards compatible, offers what the future features are and allows partial implementation. The kinds of problems say Microsoft, Apple, DEC or Sun had in pushing forward. I'm a fan of tight vertical integration but there certainly are counter arguments against it and for loose coupling.
The problem isn't init scripts it is what to do with chains of dependencies on high availability. If you worked in Linux-HA think about the application specific restart code that each application had to do and how fragile it all was.
I help people migrate to cloud. IaaS/PaaS is a godsend in getting complex application stacks working. I can offer experience there that what I'm finding is not that people want a lighter thinner init-system but they want an process manager which is capable of intelligently handling
resource orchestration, resource monitoring, resource provision and resource balancing ....
virtual machines: backup, restart, status...
storage virtualization: especially backup
network virtualization
continuous test
continuous delivery especially decommissioning a
security validation
database monitoring
They all want an much richer environment of management tools. In real life I've never met anyone who thinks systemd is too thick, they all argue it is too thin. The amount of time IT people spend worrying about basic things like messaging across security zones is infuriating to management. Mostly now that Linux is taking on the workloads of mainframes I'm finding most companies want Linux to offer the kinds of services you would find on mainframes (but more modern).
That's not true either.
1953 estimate for Auschwitz: 800,000 to 900,000
1961 estimate: 1m
1983: 1.4m
1990s: 1.1m
No it wasn't. There was certainly an earlier debate about which init system which ended with Debian not having to make a choice. But the debate for Jessie was about systemd dependencies most of which were not tied to init.
Saying X happened for reason Y isn't historical determinism it is just an assertion about historical fact. This particular fact isn't even contested the people who did POSIX were quite openly doing it to advance open systems.
POSIX was for vendorized UNIX. POSIX advanced the proprietary Unixes. What killed them was NT and Linux, the advantages of x86 hardware mostly.
NT was after POSIX. OSX is a UNIX that came after POSIX.
An ad-hominem attack is saying argument X is wrong because Y is a bad person. Saying Y gets treated badly because he's a bad person is not an ad-hominem attack. So saying that the anti-systemd people being jerks proves that systemd is a good idea would be ad-hominem saying the anti-systemd get ad-hominem attacks for lying and ignorance is not ad-hominem though it is not polite.
I've done so. I try that too when their are factual claims.
Come on now. USA is about $5 gb/mo from Verizon less from the lesser carriers. USA is expensive it ain't that expensive.
European carriers are often subsidized more heavily (like USA land carriers). The bigger problem is that Europe even sparse countries have more uniform density. America has a lot of suburbs and x-burbs where a huge percentage of the population live in moderate densities. Rural highway is easy (though expensive). The problem is what to do in lightly populated areas.
The OS kernel really do much to manage process and threads. Consider this example: A is a daemon which depends on B which depends on C. C encounters a problem and needs to restart. What should the system do about A? Linux prior to systemd lacked any standards for this and every daemon had to handle this sort of thing on its own on top of init.
Let's make it worse. Assume A is going to follow process B's lead and process B needs to know why C crashed to decide what to do.
a) How does process B find out what happened to C?
b) How does B find out whether C was able to resolve the problem on restart?
c) How does A find out given that A and C don't directly touch?
The reason they wanted to do that was they started stripping clothes off people before killing them and wanted to be able to identify bodies for the records. This is well attested to historical fact. So asking that sort of question without quickly checking the answer implies either deliberate ignorance or dishonesty.
No it doesn't. Just talk about Israel the way you would talk about Myanmar. One doesn't conflate Tibetans in China with Burmese Tibetans in Myanmar even though they are close and support one another.
Avoid "blaming" anyone. This is a policy dispute it isn't about "blame". You disagree with policy X and want to see policy X changed. Once it goes beyond that, well then there is good reason it gets considered anti-Semitism.
I'm a fan of free speech. But the holocaust is well verified historical fact. There is no rational reason that a critic of Israel on policy grounds would need to have any opinion outside the norm on the holocaust. One can be critical of most other country's policies, even those with popular support within the country without having to make up fake history. The reason that anti-Zionism gets grouped with anti-Semitism is that anti-Zionism doesn't feel like a foreign policy debate but more like a religious debate.
Wrong. There is your mistake there. It is a process manager. It is not an init system.
Log aggregation systems for well over a decade.
POSIX was the solution to the problem of Open Systems: how to be able to write software for a huge range of proprietary Unixes without needing extensive porting. We no longer have that problem the proprietary Unixes are almost all dead or dying.
Because mostly they are ignorant liars. They state untrue things and when the truth is explained to them they often continue. They have a much thinner range of experience with systems and often condescendingly talk about how no one did X and anyone who disagrees with them can't administer a system when in fact X was the norm and they don't know all that much about how system administration is being handled today. And to boot their tone is atrocious almost unhinged. Coming at this from a place of honest exploration would have helped.