I wrote the author of the article and asked the same question. I'd be embarrassed to have a typo on NASA's website... but perhaps he was trying to be clever.
I noticed in the trailer they misspelled Dick VanDyke in the opening credits. They spelled it "Dick Van Dvke" instead. They got it right at the end credits though.
This is one of the finest pieces of polemical commercial writing I have ever read. In other words, it tears DIVX a new asshole. Without resorting to overblown rhetoric or exaggeration it quietly and calmly explains every single thing that's wrong with DIVX. No sentient human being could be left unpersuaded.
This guy literally doesn't know what he's talking about.
"The nature of such organizations is to hold onto these assets tightly and release them slowly, so that the most efficient return on investment can be achieved."
Duh no. They deploy them as quickly as possible to realize the fastest return on investment.
Slashdot Mirror
I wrote the author of the article and asked the same question. I'd be embarrassed to have a typo on NASA's website... but perhaps he was trying to be clever.
I noticed in the trailer they misspelled Dick VanDyke in the opening credits. They spelled it "Dick Van Dvke" instead. They got it right at the end credits though.
This is one of the finest pieces of polemical commercial writing I have ever read. In other words, it tears DIVX a new asshole. Without resorting to overblown rhetoric or exaggeration it quietly and calmly explains every single thing that's wrong with DIVX. No sentient human being could be left unpersuaded.
This guy literally doesn't know what he's talking about.
"The nature of such organizations is to hold onto these assets tightly and release them slowly, so that the most efficient return on investment can be achieved."
Duh no. They deploy them as quickly as possible to realize the fastest return on investment.
Is there an economist in the house?