Apple has a responsibilty to stock holders not to insite lawsuits and other detrimenst to the bottom line. They were merely being cautious buy licensing from amazon.
Why not simply invest in a G3/G4 and install linuxppc or netbsd? You'll get kick ass performance at a much cheaper per unit cost. Is your code Linux/x86 specific?
If you've ever bothered to read the patent "one clap shopping" (ie. creating a sound to cause the action to occur) is covered as well. Your other ideas are probably covered too. Do you work for amazon?
This is a non issue. Why would it be expected that a sizeable company like apple should be in the habit of setting new law and breaking patents? Apple is merely doing things the safe way as well they should!! Apple , after all, is a publicly held company with a responsibility to share holders not to incite law suits and create other liabilities to the bottom line. This is very simple business sense.
Although a drunken sot. most sotten. I must say this. that is, our current understanding of the world via the "language" of mathematics and physics(arguablly really just mathematics) would be nill without models. Think of freshman physics and what not where commonplace things like friction are neglected to examine the more fundamental behaviors of matter such as velocity. Indeed the modern concept of modelling can be traced back to galilleo and his early experiments.
Point, well, I guess the point is is that we humans have used modelling as a useful contruct, albeit a non-perfect human construct, to gain greater understanding. It is a tool of our invention rather than an impedance.
Listen up , you cannot simultaneously support the actions of RMS and his FSF and critisize governmental intervention in support of IP.
They are both cut from the same cloth. Both are, at the heart, socialist interventions. RMS and his uninformed teenage fanclub favor a
model of government support, ie. dole, for open source software development. This article is simply about a model of government
support, ie. dole, for the industry.
Listen up , you cannot simultaneously support the actions of RMS and his FSF and critisize governmental intervention in support of IP. They are both cut from the same cloth. Both are, at the heart, socialist interventions. RMS and his uninformed teenage fanclub favor a model of government support, ie. dole, for open source software development. This article is simply about a model of government support, ie. dole, for the industry.
I love it!! Hopefully this is just the beginning!!
Why this is so earth shattering that it is even worthy of being mentioned is the real story. After all I enjoy my current standard of living and any observant person knows no money with ever be made on GPLed software. That is, after all, why RMS is a filthy hippy right? All that pro narcotics claptrap on his personal site has me wondering if he is dealing drugs to support his failed software enterprises.
Yeah yeah, call me a troll, flambait, whatever. Just me *real* opinion I'll leave the mindless baiting to the kidz and merely state the truth.
wtf? you are obviously a moron. no real geek speaks of "standard" anything. Intel standard? bah. Here's a standard for you: "the right architecture for the job". For real world tasks that means RISC and it means UNIX. Intel produces cheap consumer stuff for kidz.
I would like to ask you, if you would not mind, a question or two. I apologize if an earlier posting by myself was overly cynical. It would appear you have a legal team(lawyers plural constitute a legal team , right >:) ). Who is paying their fees? Is it inhouse legal expertise the university is providing? The entity paying the legal help must have something to benefit from the investment. What is it?
Thanks!! By answering certainly you will relieve the burdon of suspicion upon prospective respondents.
"how they hope to make money". 250k downloads and making money is still a question? ha ha ha ha
Maybe RMS's communist government will take over in November and support GNOME developers on a collective farm.
The 5300s used to, occasionaly, catch fire!! This was bad. This is like trading in a Pinto(also fire prone) for a ferrari(fast,sleek, cool, and uhmm, ris supported by NetBSD & LinuxPPC). Then again, of course it runs NetBSD!!
Sorry about that last line. I just couldn't help myself.
Don't any of you people realize that the GPL is more restrictive than a corporate patent? Support a BSD style license which is truly free!!. GPL licenses support some stone headed losers socialist ideals. How stupid is this fricking junky? Just look at emacs!!*blech*
emacs=the first bloatware. Don't blame M$!!
Items are detaikled as shown in some fairly rational order
1.)I'm Drunk!!
1a)Jack And Coke!!
2)When the JD ran out I had Jim Beam
3.) wtf? I went to college for , like, math and cs and shit. why disvcuss movbies?
4.)people who dicsvuss mobies are loser who mojpred in engklisg or pholiplhy and cannot afford fine liquorz
Subject: Re: Support for NetBSD/mac68k & NetBSD/macPPC Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:29:14 -0400 From: "Arthur H. Johnson II" To: Adam Russell References: 1
Thankyou for the suggestion. I will impliment that as soon as the i386 project is completed.
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, you wrote: > Why not also support NetBSD for the second most well represented > consumer architecture? > Best Regards,
Actually Apple has always enjoyed a large segment of the education market. In fact these are the most recent numbers. Anecdotally I would say that, at least when I was an undergrad, that institutions of higher ed are not as wintel centric as , say, corporate America. Keeping in mind that this was at a university I would say that Intel had reasonable motivation to be jerks. Of course, they should have also been a bit less childish after the first "no" from Harvard.
Slashdot Mirror
Apple has a responsibilty to stock holders not to insite lawsuits and other detrimenst to the bottom line. They were merely being cautious buy licensing from amazon.
Hope they planted a script to delete all stories by and references to Jon Katz.
Why not simply invest in a G3/G4 and install linuxppc or netbsd? You'll get kick ass performance at a much cheaper per unit cost. Is your code Linux/x86 specific?
If you've ever bothered to read the patent "one clap shopping" (ie. creating a sound to cause the action to occur) is covered as well. Your other ideas are probably covered too. Do you work for amazon?
This is a non issue. Why would it be expected that a sizeable company like apple should be in the habit of setting new law and breaking patents? Apple is merely doing things the safe way as well they should!! Apple , after all, is a publicly held company with a responsibility to share holders not to incite law suits and create other liabilities to the bottom line. This is very simple business sense.
Although a drunken sot. most sotten. I must say this. that is, our current understanding of the world via the "language" of mathematics and physics(arguablly really just mathematics) would be nill without models. Think of freshman physics and what not where commonplace things like friction are neglected to examine the more fundamental behaviors of matter such as velocity. Indeed the modern concept of modelling can be traced back to galilleo and his early experiments. Point, well, I guess the point is is that we humans have used modelling as a useful contruct, albeit a non-perfect human construct, to gain greater understanding. It is a tool of our invention rather than an impedance.
Listen up , you cannot simultaneously support the actions of RMS and his FSF and critisize governmental intervention in support of IP. They are both cut from the same cloth. Both are, at the heart, socialist interventions. RMS and his uninformed teenage fanclub favor a model of government support, ie. dole, for open source software development. This article is simply about a model of government support, ie. dole, for the industry.
Listen up , you cannot simultaneously support the actions of RMS and his FSF and critisize governmental intervention in support of IP. They are both cut from the same cloth. Both are, at the heart, socialist interventions. RMS and his uninformed teenage fanclub favor a model of government support, ie. dole, for open source software development. This article is simply about a model of government support, ie. dole, for the industry.
I love it!! Hopefully this is just the beginning!! Why this is so earth shattering that it is even worthy of being mentioned is the real story. After all I enjoy my current standard of living and any observant person knows no money with ever be made on GPLed software. That is, after all, why RMS is a filthy hippy right? All that pro narcotics claptrap on his personal site has me wondering if he is dealing drugs to support his failed software enterprises. Yeah yeah, call me a troll, flambait, whatever. Just me *real* opinion I'll leave the mindless baiting to the kidz and merely state the truth.
wtf? you are obviously a moron. no real geek speaks of "standard" anything. Intel standard? bah. Here's a standard for you: "the right architecture for the job". For real world tasks that means RISC and it means UNIX. Intel produces cheap consumer stuff for kidz.
I would like to ask you, if you would not mind, a question or two. I apologize if an earlier posting by myself was overly cynical. It would appear you have a legal team(lawyers plural constitute a legal team , right >:) ). Who is paying their fees? Is it inhouse legal expertise the university is providing? The entity paying the legal help must have something to benefit from the investment. What is it? Thanks!! By answering certainly you will relieve the burdon of suspicion upon prospective respondents.
"how they hope to make money". 250k downloads and making money is still a question? ha ha ha ha Maybe RMS's communist government will take over in November and support GNOME developers on a collective farm.
mysql?
The 5300s used to, occasionaly, catch fire!! This was bad. This is like trading in a Pinto(also fire prone) for a ferrari(fast,sleek, cool, and uhmm, ris supported by NetBSD & LinuxPPC). Then again, of course it runs NetBSD!! Sorry about that last line. I just couldn't help myself.
Don't any of you people realize that the GPL is more restrictive than a corporate patent? Support a BSD style license which is truly free!!. GPL licenses support some stone headed losers socialist ideals. How stupid is this fricking junky? Just look at emacs!!*blech* emacs=the first bloatware. Don't blame M$!!
Items are detaikled as shown in some fairly rational order 1.)I'm Drunk!! 1a)Jack And Coke!! 2)When the JD ran out I had Jim Beam 3.) wtf? I went to college for , like, math and cs and shit. why disvcuss movbies? 4.)people who dicsvuss mobies are loser who mojpred in engklisg or pholiplhy and cannot afford fine liquorz
Keep your wretched hands off *BSD. Next you'll wonder where the office suite is. To find out $man vi . Keep BSD the way god intended!!
Subject:
Re: Support for NetBSD/mac68k & NetBSD/macPPC
Date:
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:29:14 -0400
From:
"Arthur H. Johnson II"
To:
Adam Russell
References:
1
Thankyou for the suggestion. I will impliment that as soon as the i386 project
is completed.
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Why not also support NetBSD for the second most well represented
> consumer architecture?
> Best Regards,
Actually Apple has always enjoyed a large segment of the education market. In fact these are the most recent numbers. Anecdotally I would say that, at least when I was an undergrad, that institutions of higher ed are not as wintel centric as , say, corporate America. Keeping in mind that this was at a university I would say that Intel had reasonable motivation to be jerks. Of course, they should have also been a bit less childish after the first "no" from Harvard.