Slashdot Mirror


Google's Second Generation Nexus 7 Benchmarks

MojoKid writes "Google's second gen Nexus 7 tablet is a worthy successor to the original, boasting an improved design both internally and externally. It's thinner and lighter, has a faster Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro SoC, 2GB of RAM, a higher resolution 1920X1200 display and it's running the latest Android 4.3 Jelly Bean release. The display alone was a nice upgrade in a 7-inch slate that retails for well under $300. However, it turns out the new Nexus 7 is also one of the fastest tablets out there right now, with benchmark numbers that best some of the top tablets on the market, especially in graphics and gaming. From a price/performance standpoint, Google's second generation Nexus 7 seems to be the tablet to beat right now."

205 comments

  1. well gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I better buy one quick then

    1. Re:well gosh by Deathspawner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the right decision.

    2. Re:well gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah ... unless you're planning on modding it with AOSP

    3. Re:well gosh by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      In which case, it's the tablet to boot right now; because that's currently an unsolved problem...

    4. Re:well gosh by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was planning to pick one up until I read this.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:well gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, all 12 of the people who want to do that should stick with the older Nexus 7. The rest of us who want an inexpensive, awesome tablet can get the new Nexus 7. (My wife's came today, mine comes Friday and our kids are getting our last year's Nexus 7s). The new one is very nice. I couldn't give a rat's ass about modding the thing.

    6. Re:well gosh by JaniceMaiorano · · Score: 1

      Succint. I like it.

    7. Re:well gosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't buy a Nexus 7 for one reason. No SD card slot.

      That is just fail. Absolute fail.

    8. Re:well gosh by RMingin · · Score: 2

      I am the target market, I bought two original Nexus 7s, and later a Nexus 10, and I love them. This news is deeply distressing, I was already unhappy at the number of binary blobs needed to make the N7 and N10 go, to find out that the N7-2 won't even have public restore images as a result of them is a deal breaker.

      I've just gone from "will buy an N7-2 when the budget allows" to "totally disinterested". You can't even try out third party ROMs on your N7-2.

      You've missed the boat, Google. You forgot what it was that made Android awesome, and now it's time to leave you to it.

      Upvote parent if it comes off of +5, please.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    9. Re:well gosh by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The issue there is the publication of the blobs, which AOSP generally does for devices they officially support.

      Cyanogenmod/etc already have scripts in their build instructions that use adb to pull all the blobs off of an already-working device so that they can avoid distributing them. Anybody who owns the device already has the blobs in the stock image.

      The only real pain is when there is some major upgrade with new blobs. Usually in that case the new blobs just get posted on some warez site someplace so that the CM/etc don't have to redistribute them directly. However, you can still in theory flash back to stock, upgrade stock, then re-extract the new blobs.

      All of this should still be unnecessary for Nexus devices, but it is still doable - you don't even have to find an exploit to root them.

    10. Re:well gosh by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I know this is a bit late for this story, but the factory images have been released.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  2. Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    My benchmark: WPM cut in half. Reason: I had to switch back to the on-screen keyboard because just as changes to Bluetooth in Android 4.2 broke support for the Wii Remote, changes to Bluetooth in Android 4.3 broke several popular Bluetooth keyboards, including the ZAGGkeys Flex that I happen to own (source).

    1. Re:Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      It supports low power mode (as does the previous version as of 4.3) ... wonder if the implementation on the tablet or the keyboard is a little sloppy.

    2. Re:Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Fortunately my Zippy keyboard seems to work fine.

      Yeehah!

    3. Re:Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple wireless keyboard happy on my nexus 7 (hw v1) with 4.3

    4. Re:Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's good news. Could never get mine to pair successfully on 4.2.x.

    5. Re: Android 4.3 breaks many Bluetooth keyboards by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one disappointed that it tops out at 32gb and has no SD card slot? Even 2012 iPad Mini offers 64gb, why isn't 64gb offered in the latest and greatest Android tablet? And isn't one of the great features of Android the fact that it can use removable storage and iOS devices can't? Why is Google removing one of the best features of Android? I know the old Nexus 7 didn't have a card slot too but a lot of people complained, I thought for sure they would offer at least micro SDXC on the next generation. 32gb, no SD, no thanks

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  3. Amazing device. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I picked one up when I found them in stock at my local $big_box_electronics_retailer. I already have a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, which was a cool device when I picked it up.

    This thing, however, is a whole other universe. The UI is snappy and responsive and fast. Fastest I've ever seen on any Android device. No lag, no jitter, no stuttering while scrolling. The display is amazing. Everything is sharp. Colors are well defined and look "deep". It packs as many pixels as my 1080p HDTV in to a 7 inch display. (And people say we're not ready for 4k HDTV. Pfff)

    Android 4.3 really ups the game. All of my google services migrated over just by logging in. Most of my apps came too, but some bugged. (I suspect they were not compatible)

    I liked my galaxy tab. Nice, small, flexible tablet with lots of geeky stuff to do but I had to root it to get rid of the crapware Samsung shovles on to it. That's what I like most about this new nexus. It's a clean out of box experience loaded with core apps that really have a high quality experience. (You know, the Google apps services you're probably going to use regardless. That's really the big appeal here. Don't fool yourself)

    Yeah, it's like an ipad in that regard.

    1. Re:Amazing device. by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reports like yours out weigh any benchmarks.

      Haven't we learned never to trust benchmarks yet?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Amazing device. by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 4 is the same. I have the previous Nexus 7 tablet, and the Nexus 4 is vastly faster and smoother. The N7 is apparently a very similar, slightly faster processor. Sucks about the current AOSP situation though.

    3. Re:Amazing device. by Sun · · Score: 1

      Haven't we learned not trust anonymous coward reporting?

      Shachar

    4. Re:Amazing device. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In all seriousness: it's the first device I've seen that has almost as responsive a UI as an iPad. I work at a company that is currently porting an iOS app over to Android and after seeing this, I know which device we'll be using for all our demos in the near future!

    5. Re:Amazing device. by symbolset · · Score: 2

      When icebike endorses an AC, we need to ask if she was the AC.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Amazing device. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      OK, then. Here's a non-AC review. Yesterday, I gave my gen 1 Nexus 7 to my wife and brought home the new model. The original has been one of the best consumer electronics experiences I've ever had. The improvements in gen 2 are incremental, but substantial. There was nothing wrong with the old model, but the new one seems even snappier, looks better, and has the same high-quality build. I gave the first model a beating and it never gave me a problem.

      I had my doubts about the usefulness of a 7" tablet, but somebody gave me the first one for Christmas last year. It's become a critical part of my mobile setup.

      My wife is sitting on the porch watching Netflix on the old model right now. The new one is charging to my right and will be slipped into my bag when I leave the house in the AM.

      There's an iPad 2 here too. I use it as a MIDI controller, sort of a KAOSS pad+ but that's all. It's not as nice to hold as the Nexus 7, so I've got a little gizmo that mounts the iPad on a mic stand. It stays there.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Amazing device. by Sun · · Score: 2

      No offense intended, but this isn't a review. Come again after you've actually used it.

      Personally, I do not intend to buy the new Nexus 7 at least until it will be possible to build AOSP for it (but I might go out and buy the old one now :-). That said, I have nothing for or against it.

      All I'm saying is that your comment did not add information. The comment you'll write in 24 hours likely will, however.

      Shachar

    8. Re:Amazing device. by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      "Android 4.3 really ups the game. All of my google services migrated over just by logging in. Most of my apps came too, but some bugged."

      Bugged I presume by a couple of three-letter agencies? Seriously, I'd stick to my generic China tab, which I can very well afford to brick and run fast enough for my browsing, ebook reading and occasional puzzle games. Here's a car analogy: Not everybody needs a Lexus to go to work.

    9. Re:Amazing device. by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      No offense intended, but this isn't a review. Come again after you've actually used it.

      Personally, I do not intend to buy the new Nexus 7 at least until it will be possible to build AOSP for it (but I might go out and buy the old one now :-). That said, I have nothing for or against it.

      All I'm saying is that your comment did not add information. The comment you'll write in 24 hours likely will, however.

      Shachar

      The old Nexus 7 is an amazing thing. I had bought the 3G version on a whim and immediately regretted it. I did all my mobile computing on an Asus Transformer Prime, took it everywhere with me and really couldn't justify buying another toy. Long story short: I carry my Nexus 7 around with me all the time and my Transformer stays at home.
      I WOULD have bought the Nexus 7 if there wasn't that AOSP bruhaha. We've been warned for months and still we get a Nexus device that isn't supported by AOSP because of proprietary drivers which won't even be released in binary form. And now this happens: http://www.engadget.com/2013/08/07/aosp-maintenance-head-leaves-role-in-wake-of-open-source-issues/
      This feels wrong on so many levels.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    10. Re:Amazing device. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Maybe I didn't make it clear, but when I wrote the review, I'd already been using the new Nexus for more than a day.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Amazing device. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 4 CPU is indeed quite nice. It is much more responsive than my Nexus 10 (granted, the latter is still way better than any of the previous gen devices, and it has a lot more pixels to push around). Glad to hear they're keeping it up with the new Nexus 7.

  4. Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No open source driver, you can keep your hardware!

  5. If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It certain does not excel on the battery life metric.

    1. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Compared to?

      According to TFA, it's "up to 9 hours." The original Nexus 7 had 10 hours, so it's an hour less. But considering it has to drive that Retina-like display, it's pretty darn good.

    2. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's the manufacturer's claim. The tests I've seen, using real-world things like more than 50% brightness and wifi put it at about 6-7 hours. Similar tests on iPads Minis regularly get 9-10+ hours.

    3. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Compared to?

      According to TFA, it's "up to 9 hours." The original Nexus 7 had 10 hours, so it's an hour less. But considering it has to drive that Retina-like display, it's pretty darn good.

      Battery life as tested in a lab, rather than leaving it up to the manufacturer.

      Tablet Battery Life
      Nexus 7 (2013) 7:15
      Apple iPad mini 12:43 (WiFi)
      Apple iPad (late 2012) 11:08 (WiFi)

      http://www.engadget.com/2013/07/29/nexus-7-review-2013/

    4. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by gander666 · · Score: 1

      I have the original, and even brand new the battery life sucked

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    5. Re: If you don't mind a dead battery by deathguppie · · Score: 2

      Mine must be a fluke then. I'm writing this response from one and haven't plugged it in in three days. Admittedly I haven't been playing movies the whole time just surfing playing YouTube videos and the like but it lasts at least twice what my galaxy s2 does for the same usage. I've had other tablets and this one needs the least charging of any I've owned. 72 he's and still a third of a battery left.

      --
      once more into the breach
    6. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the manufacturer's claim. The tests I've seen, using real-world things like more than 50% brightness and wifi put it at about 6-7 hours. Similar tests on iPads Minis regularly get 9-10+ hours.

      But brightness is the key power sucking feature. And nobody I know runs any android tablet at full brightness.
      You might have to do so outside on a sunny day. but typical living room / office use I have the brightness slider almost to the lowest possible setting. In a bright room I might move it up, but never so far as a quarter of the way.

      Disclaimer: not a nexus tablet.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Update: many of our commenters have rightly pointed out that the new Nexus 7 has a much brighter display, which may lead to faster battery drain when it's set at the same percentage instead of a nit-for-nit comparison"

      was set to 50 brightness, most people would only use like 30 or 40

    8. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      from the comments:

      "CNET, in their battery test, which plays a video at equal and measured brightness levels across devices, found the following results for the new Nexus 7 :

      Video battery life (in hours) : Google Nexus 7 (2013) 11.5, Apple iPad Mini 12, Google Nexus 7 (2012)10.1."

    9. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      Also brightness should be measured in absolute terms (nits). One tablet's 50% is not the same as another.

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    10. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by icebike · · Score: 1

      Don't know a single person who has a nits meter.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      Me either :) But the good tech review sites have them (Anandtech, for example)

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    12. Re: If you don't mind a dead battery by N1AK · · Score: 1

      That's exactly like my experience with both the S2 (needs charging an irritating amount) and old Nexus 7 (needs charging every 3-4 days). I think the people who are getting frustrated are probably using it to watch more video than we do.

    13. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all you want is to do is play video, that's good.

    14. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The iPad Mini costs a lot more than a Nexus 7. If you really need >7 hours active use per day out of your tablet you are gonna have to pay for it. If you prefer Android there are other tablets or external battery packs.

      It's hardly surprising that the Nexus 7 has a lower run time than the iPad mini. They weigh about the same (iPad slightly heavier) but the Nexus 7 has a much better screen, which of course needs more power to run. If you plan to spend 7 hours looking at a 7" screen it might as well be a good one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      I have the original, and even brand new the battery life sucked

      ...and charging over USB takes forever. But it is quite fast when using the original docking station.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    16. Re:If you don't mind a dead battery by jon3k · · Score: 2

      Your iPad mini is also slower and has a far lower resolution display.

  6. In related news by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's silly! What does that have to do with how you use the tablet? You democrats, your boycots, and mis-guided belief in the lies the democrat part keeps spewing out of their mouths, truely are rediculous!

  7. Here's your chance to put up or shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you give a rat's ass about open software, you'd pass up this device which was the cause for the lead of AOSP to quit in disgust, and sign up for the Edge on Indiegogo which promises to be completely unlocked.

    1. Re:Here's your chance to put up or shut up by Osgeld · · Score: 0, Troll

      good thing I dont give a rats ass

    2. Re:Here's your chance to put up or shut up by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not signing up for the Edge, but equally, I'm not buying this device.

      I only like to buy a product when I can walk into a store and fork over cash for it, or at least order it up and then order another one if I need to. Speculating isn't my thing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Not Buying it by hackus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Replaceable Battery
    No ROM possible.

    Just plain NO.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Not Buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No Replaceable Battery
      No ROM possible.

      Just plain NO.

      -Hack

      I have better things to do with $250 - like make a student loan payment.

      No toys for me until the student loan is paid off and my retirement is properly funded. Add in all the other bills, and it turns out I'm never getting one of these.

      Posted from my P4 desktop running Windows XP.

    2. Re:Not Buying it by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Actually battery replacement isnt impossible.

      http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nexus+7+2nd+Generation+Teardown/16072/1

    3. Re:Not Buying it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Also no flash slot.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Not Buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ROM possible.

      What does that mean? Are you talking about Qualcomm? Because ROMs are certainly technically possible and in fact do exist

    5. Re: Not Buying it by glennrrr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might want to do yourself a favor and attach a Kill-A-Watt to that P4 for a month and see what that cheap old hardware is costing you.

    6. Re: Not Buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did it. And old Dell with P4 2.0 GHz consumes between 20-30 W in idle. HP XW workstation with P4 3.2 GHz at least 85 W in idle.

    7. Re: Not Buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then get a cheap new Celeron G1610 system that will use about 25W.

    8. Re:Not Buying it by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Also no flash slot.

      I had thought that was a huge problem when I got my old 32GB Nexus 7. I'm used to my 64GB Transformer Prime which I have fitted with a 64GB MicroSD and a 128GB SD Card. It isn't such a huge problem but I can live with that limitation on a device I mainly use when commuting. I wouldn't be able to live with it on my regular tablet.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    9. Re:Not Buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using a variety of free apps, it's easy to grab/move files between my Nikon camera with wireless, my desktop, my wife's laptop, my home file server, and several cloud services. It's especially cool because I can preview pictures from my camera on a bit larger screen than the camera has. :)

      Plus, I bought a $2 cable adapter that plugs into the micro USB port, giving me a standard "old" USB port. That cable is only 5 inches long, and I can carry it in any pocket. Into that I can plug my flash drives, flash card reader, an adapter to mini USB which connects to my older Nikon cameras and other devices, and other USB devices as I choose. And I have the original Nexus 7, not the new one.

      Normally, I don't need any of this. I carry the Nexus lots of places and mostly I've found I just need a USB charger. The wireless does most of what I need with the tablet, and I definitely don't want it on a cell network.

    10. Re:Not Buying it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ROM possible? CM 10.2 would like to have a little talk with you. Even though Qualcomm won't let Google release the factory images due to their binary blobs, those files are easily (and already have been) pulled from production devices.

    11. Re: Not Buying it by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You might want to do yourself a favor and attach a Kill-A-Watt to that P4 for a month and see what that cheap old hardware is costing you.

      My old 2.4GHz P4 idled at 39W including spinning HDD, GPU, etc. *Most* new systems don't even do that well. And even if you find something *slightly* better on power, even in the parts of the US with the highest electricity costs, it'll take many, many YEARS (if not DECADES, particularly if your system is usually powered-off or hibernated/suspended) for your purchase to become cash positive from savings on your electric bill. Before that time, you'll no doubt have replaced the system, so you'll be forever in-the-hole, losing money on the deal.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Not Buying it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      You're talking about workarounds. No question about it: the missing flash slot is a deficiency. Rather rubs in your face the fact that Google actually admires and aspires to Apple's evil ways.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re: Not Buying it by glennrrr · · Score: 1

      Well, that is surprisingly good then. I had a P4 3GHz running Linux which was costing me $12 a month in electricity at around 110W several years ago, and spinning its fans constantly.

  9. Does it have a storage slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a user replaceable battery? If not, I don't care if it's the greatest device since, ever - they can stick it right up their arse.

    1. Re:Does it have a storage slot by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      You can't stick it up their arse -- they don't have a storage slot.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  10. Cooked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the benchmark numbers cooked like Samsung does, by allowing the CPU and GPU to run faster when a benchmark program is recognized?

  11. Yawn ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

    Perhaps some might be oooh and aaah over yet-another-tablet, not me

    What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

    Nowadays all the new smartphone and tablet offerings sound much like new cars - ooooh, model 2014 Buick is so much better than the ones in 2013, with shiny wheels, with more comfy seats, more safety features, it gonna be great, really ?

    A 2014 Buick (or Chrysler or Toyota) is a car, just like a 2013 Buick (or Chrysler or Toyota). There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars, and unfortunately, nor for the smartphones / tablets

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Yawn ... by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tough customer. I suggest you just keep waiting until Google introduces its wearable solar powered subspace search appliance.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Yawn ... by Nethead · · Score: 0

      My wife and I recently purchased a very well cared for 2001 Volvo S60. Almost all the people that have seen it are surprised that it is not a new car. It was the first year of that body style and the carried it through to 2010 so it still has fairly modern lines. But it still has 130k miles and cost us $4300. To me it's like a new car after years with the '93 Saturn!

      In the same vain I work in IT and just took home an old box from work left over from the latest round of upgrades. It's an HP dc7900 Core2 box with 16MB RAM, Nvidia business graphics card and I stuck in an SSD. With a couple of 22" screens it will serve as my home development box for many years. I'm not much of a gamer so this old Acad engineering box is like a new computer to me.

      I just can't really see having to have the latest and greatest anymore. It's not worth the time or money.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sir, I am getting off your lawn now.

    4. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      16MB of ram? I hope you're not compiling much more than for a pic in DOS, do they even have non windows PIC compilers these days? Maybe compile for an 8051? Windows 95 here you come!

    5. Re:Yawn ... by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm with on this, sadly.

      The gadget geek in me really wants this tablet. But the truth is that my year-old tablet, though not nearly as performant as this new toy, is perfectly fine for the only thing I actually use it for: reading e-books. The processor and memory don't make any difference. The screen is kind of tempting, but would mean more to me if I did real work on my tablet (I care a lot about my laptop screen resolution).

      Tablet makers are going to have to come up with something pretty innovative to get me to bother upgrading.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    6. Re:Yawn ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      Well, then don't buy one, and don't bother to let us all know how underwhelmed you are -- we're underwhelmed that you're underwhelmed.

      What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

      But you have NO idea of what that would be, and you're going to sulk until such time as they do? Right.

      There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars, and unfortunately, nor for the smartphones / tablets

      And for the most part, this has been true in the industry for a very long time now. The machine on my desktop now is an exceedingly boring direct descendant of the one that sat on my desk 25 years ago -- a screen, keys, and a box full of stuff to make it go.

      With a 4 digit ID, you should bloody well know that. Name 5 truly revolutionary pieces of technology in the last 25 years in the realm of computers ... anything which came from existing technology in any way doesn't count. Because, after all, that's just evolutionary which seems to make you sad.

      Tell you what, you go build something freakin' awesome, and when you get back, we'll all piss and moan about how it's not nearly cool enough.

      Your existential malaise is something best savored by yourself.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Yawn ... by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      The "promise" of Ubuntu Touch is that is a tablet or phone... until you connect it a keyboard and maybe a monitor, then it becomes a desktop computer. Thats one possible new approach (but for this tablet in particular won't happen until Qualcomm open up the drivers, so for now avoid it), but probably a lot of approachs would be to have devices that gets enhanced or behaves different by what you connect to them. There are other approachs, like several kind of convertible notebooks or pluggable keyboards, but most of the new ones comes with Android (not a desktop OS) or Windows OS (bad for every device it runs).

    8. Re:Yawn ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It was GB, not MB and I am with you. I have three dual Nehalem quadcore rack servers (DL380 with 8 SAS/SATA bays and 6 pcie slots, 1 GB BBWC, redundant power and all that) in a rolling rack in my garage retired from vmware duties with 96GB RAM each. Can't think of anything useful enough to bear the watts and fan noise to do with them. 36 3+ Ghz IA64 Xeon cores, 72 threads and 256 GB of RAM and I can't be bothered to power it up. If you had told me five years ago I could be in this position I would have asked you to check your meds.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Yawn ... by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      Better hardware means more interesting software...

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    10. Re:Yawn ... by Nethead · · Score: 2

      You're right, Gigs. I must be getting old.

      I hear you on the rack stuff. I've got enough stashed away to start a small ISP, if it was 2003 again. Glad I passed on that Cisco 7509 a few years back. But I remember back in the late 90s we were the hot kids on the block (or in the telco hotel) with a pair of T3s going into one.

      It's sad how some of this stuff ages, and how loud the fans are.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    11. Re:Yawn ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Jesus. Cisco stuff. I had forgot that. We have ten years worth of Cisco trade-ins in our warehouse from every major vendor including Cisco. Worth nothing, can't throw it out.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    12. Re:Yawn ... by slaker · · Score: 2

      I've got a 24 thread/48GB/108TB system in my back bedroom in spread across a couple 3U Norco chassis (desktop-style PSU and cooling and thankfully almost no noise) that can service a dozen 3Mbit real-time video transcoding requests through Plex and still has the horsepower to run five not-insubstantial Guest VMs at the same time. That machine actually saves me money because it replaced four i7 rigs that I had been using but I can't imagine what possible reason I could have for any more hardware than that.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    13. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gadget geek in me really wants this tablet. But the truth is that my year-old tablet, though not nearly as performant as this new toy, is perfectly fine for the only thing I actually use it for: reading e-books.

      My ereader from 2006 still does a better job with e-books (except PDFs) than your year old tablet.

      Don't buy something because you want it. Buy it because it fills a function your current tech does not.

    14. Re:Yawn ... by EEPROMS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shame it has a Qualcom chipset because now for me as a hardware hacker it is off my list of toys to buy. The only thing of interest for me lately the the Ubuntu edge mobile, hopefully they avoid the qualcom mess.

    15. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike cars, phones and tablets still get a significant performance boost with every new generation. Of course, like cars, the performance of the current models is more than most people have any real use for.

    16. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the evolution of the Nexus 7 into an iPad revolutionary?

    17. Re:Yawn ... by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      How often do you really need a revolution? I'd say a revolution is a once in a lifetime type thing. Many people would consider the smartphone revolutionary and they didn't exist 10 years ago! In theory you should be waiting another 70 years or so for the next true revolution. Or how bout just the cell phone? That was invented 30-40 some odd years ago so we still have 40 years to go. Or the internet (about the same time). Or digital computers? Now were getting to something that happened almost a lifetime ago. But in the mean time people have also gone to the moon and somehow made it profitable for everyone involved to sell a packet of ramen, a full meal to some, for under $0.15! Including transportation across the world! You want a revolution? Take your pick. The problem you might be having is that you are around for all of the other technologies and events that make today's tablets possible. You really think in a world of 7 billion people, there is a completely new unique idea that has not appeared in prior human history? Think of the craziest bleeding edge theory you can think of and search IEEE and you'll probably find dozens of papers on the subject already. Unless aliens show up and give us warp drive and transporters I doubt any new technology will meet your standards of revolutionary.

      While I'm here, I'll give you the revolution you want from google: the self driving car. Which conveniently takes care of your cars gripe as well.

    18. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound like an entitled little bitch.

    19. Re:Yawn ... by andydread · · Score: 1

      I would presume that you are enjoying your shiny new Google Glass. carry on then.

    20. Re:Yawn ... by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

      I bet you were the first one to buy a Segway when it came out.
      /sarcasm

    21. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There never was anything revolutionary... just you were too young to notice all the crap that came before. You propose Henry Ford should've invented a fusion reactor?

    22. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Your existential malaise is something best savored by yourself"

      I'm totally using that somewhere today.

    23. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

      Why, oh why? Tablets are an evoluationary dead end anyway.

      How about giving us back good quality keyboards and full control over the hardware first?

    24. Re:Yawn ... by N1AK · · Score: 2

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      I think that's an over simplification but ultimately we are reaching that point in the smartphone/tablet market. The very first devices were heavy, had low res screens, couldn't run or store high quality video, had shockingly bad cameras etc. Each year the new models were better in ways that were genuinely meaningful to users.

      I just upgraded from a galaxy S2 to an S4 purely because my old contract ran out. It's two years newer and other than a slightly better battery life the screen (bigger and higher res) is basically the only difference I notice. Actually to be fair the camera is better as well so I do actually take photos of things from time to time now. Ultimately all those two years have done for a normal user is removed some of the shortcomings of the older model. Now the screen is huge (for a phone) and high-res it isn't a shortcoming to improve in future.

    25. Re: Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, tablets are (in many ways) a backward step from a PC. Less powerful/capable (try stream 1080p for instance). Also tablets SUCK for creation.
      I find it hard to get excited about them too, but for different reasons to the GP poster.

    26. Re:Yawn ... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      There should be some way to sell computing power to cloud customers. Like a live-CD Linux distribution you boot, and it connects to some online exchange to see if anyone wants to rent virtual machines. If nobody is offering enough cash to cover your power costs then it sends the machine to sleep. However, CPU power efficiency improves fast enough that even if the hardware is free and sitting idle in your garage, you still might not be competitive with specialist cloud providers. (Then there are the inevitable issues about data privacy, reliability etc.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    27. Re:Yawn ... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Then wait until next year for the next better model.

      I bought a nook color 2.5 years ago when they first came out. I enjoyed the 7" form factor but I couldn't find a decent replacement. when the new nexus 7's were announced I was happy. I got even happier when amazon and best buy started releasing them for sale 5 days before the official launch.

      But I plan on keeping it around for the next 2-3 years and make sure I get my money's worth out of it.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    28. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could get that machine folding for medical research, that would earn you a load of kudos!

    29. Re: Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you define "creation" as "the form of creation I'm used with". Tablets are way better for drawing than a standard PC, for example.

    30. Re:Yawn ... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      it gonna be great, really

      No, not really; it's a fucking Buick. :)

    31. Re:Yawn ... by bfandreas · · Score: 2

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      Well, then don't buy one, and don't bother to let us all know how underwhelmed you are -- we're underwhelmed that you're underwhelmed.

      What I am looking for - especially from tech firms such as Google - is something totally new, something that is revolutionary, not evolutionary

      But you have NO idea of what that would be, and you're going to sulk until such time as they do? Right.

      There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars, and unfortunately, nor for the smartphones / tablets

      And for the most part, this has been true in the industry for a very long time now. The machine on my desktop now is an exceedingly boring direct descendant of the one that sat on my desk 25 years ago -- a screen, keys, and a box full of stuff to make it go.

      With a 4 digit ID, you should bloody well know that. Name 5 truly revolutionary pieces of technology in the last 25 years in the realm of computers ... anything which came from existing technology in any way doesn't count. Because, after all, that's just evolutionary which seems to make you sad.

      Tell you what, you go build something freakin' awesome, and when you get back, we'll all piss and moan about how it's not nearly cool enough.

      Your existential malaise is something best savored by yourself.

      While everything derives from everything(standing on the shoulders of giants) there are a couple of things that absolutely spring to mind:
      -This ePaper thing. I've watched it growing from an idea to the Kindle eco system. It absolutely changed the way I consume the written word.
      -Media compression. I have ripped all my CDs which I collected since the late 80ies. I've ripped all my DVDs which I bought since the 2000s. I've rebought a lot of my comic collection in a digital format. That also absolutely changed the way how I consume media.
      -eCommerce. Back in the 80ies I was really, really happy if I could get the odd Stephen King or Garfield book in English. Booksellers rarely stocked them and anything I wanted(if I even knew it existed) had to be ordered. Now I have a wide range of things available on short notice. Even the things out of the ordinary.
      -the WWW/search engines. When I got my first internet connection back at university Gopher still was a thing. It was arcane and something only for insiders. The sheer amount of infomation I now have at my finger-tips boggles the mind. When I learned to program I had actual books for APIs. Information is not readily available if you have to leaf through 3 volumes at 300 pages+ each. If you watch a movie and you stumble over a historical context that you weren't aware of you can search the net for it and have that information available. Before we had that you would have to try your luck with an encyclopedia which may or may not contain what you were looking for. If you could find it.
      -global communication. We are now able to communicate with very little limitations with each other world wide. Before we had that ordinary people who never left their home country hardly got to share ideas or got confronted with other points of views from a different cultural background. We still suffer from the culture shock but I can't stress how much I learned about places without ever having been there.


      If you only look for revolutionary stuff from a technical point of view then yeah, you only see the same old. But if you take a look at how technology alters your own behaviour then there has been a lot going on the last couple of years. Take it frome somebody who still remembers bits of the 70ies and the 80ies that life has changed quite a lot and our individual potential has increased drastically. Sadly, people still are kind of stupid. Which propably will not change anytime soon.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    32. Re:Yawn ... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Saw a 48-port 10/100 Bay Networks switch at the secondhand store the other day for $5. Still remember the bragging rights our IT department had when we first unboxed one of those. I think it uplinked to a 256k frame relay connection to the Internet.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    33. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What motor does your S60 have? If it's the 2.4T, the transmissions are notorious for premature failure (and failure will total the car). Most don't make it past 75k, you're definitely an outcast if you're reached 130k.

      The 2002-2010 S60s had a new motor and transmission.

    34. Re:Yawn ... by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      Mount them backwards and use them as keyboard shelves. The guts may be worthless but metal is metal.

    35. Re:Yawn ... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Shuttleworth has said there will be blobs in the Edge too.

      --
      Good-bye
    36. Re:Yawn ... by Tallfeather · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Fusion reactor, so passe. It's just a classic steam engine with a hotter fire, after all.
      We want something truly revolutionary! Something, I say!

    37. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 2001 year is one of the worst for Volvo cars, 1999 being the worst.

      Its got 130k, so you need to make sure - the ABS controller has been replaced, the timing belt has been replaced and the ETM (electronic throttle) unit has been replaced.

      Good luck

    38. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter how thin it is, no matter how fast it is, no matter how well the display can be, it is still a tablet

      Which is the perfect way to have all of your smartphone capability without paying for data. Get a dump phone and a tablet and you're golden.

      There's nothing revolutionary anymore in cars

      Tesla would like to have a word with you. I'm sure Toyota would like to talk to you about the Prius Plug-in, GM about the Chevy Volt and Spark, and Nissan about the Leaf.

    39. Re:Yawn ... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Anyone got some HSSI cables to connect to... fuck, I don't know what.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    40. Re:Yawn ... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Oh, and that 7509 from back in the day... I hosted images.slashdot.com through it to a Pent 133 running slackware. Rob had maxed out his T1 and needed to offload some bandwidth. I had a cool boss that said, "That looks like a cool site, sure."

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    41. Re:Yawn ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Can't do that either. Obligated to store them until Cisco will take them. Apparently they're accepting shipments of crap now, so in 2-3 years the warehouse may have room for other stuff again. A deal is a deal.

      I have a local personal vendor for useless metal crap that's PC related. They get paid to take it away from the source and sell it to me for the metal salvage rate because that's better than paying to ship it overseas. It's worth the price to avoid the ethical issues with repurposing surplus outside the agreed terms. They sold me a couple of 48U rolling racks and hardware for cheap, some laptops and a lot of other stuff. Sometimes they take me to school though - recently I bought a PowerMac G5 for $100 there thinking it was a MacPro with dual Xeons because they look the same on the outside. My fault. I'm torn between keeping it as a museum piece or doing a case mod. Linux will run on this but it's not worth the effort - I have far more Linux capable gear that isn't so much trouble than I know what to do with, obviously.

      I am a huge fan of repurposing surplus as long as the terms for removal are unambiguous: remove and dispose in the best way, destroy the drives. Unfortunately you don't usually get those terms in my role - I'm not a surplus guy primarily, just incidentally in the course of other work. When you do get that deal also, it's great!

      One day maybe I'll work on the surplus side and help hold this gear out of the environment a little while longer. Vendors have been working hard to prevent this though, with "lease" deals that ensure they can take the devices out of the repurpose stream. They knew "good enough" computing was coming. Most of the stuff entering the surplus channel now is just crap even I couldn't make use of - 10/100 switches, VGA-only LCDs, inkjet printers, SCSI scanners and so forth. The last of the CRTs. Servers that say "Compaq" on them.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    42. Re:Yawn ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I understand. There are days that I just wander the aisles of our warehouse stacked three units high with pallets of these discarded things and reminisce for a while about how awesome it would have been to have this back in the day, how important the managers of this gear were, how much it cost not just for the gear, but the maintenance, software licenses, support, admin salary. These were the totems of a tech religion that ruled all. But now it's just junk that costs money to be rid of. The stuff we drool over today will also be worthless junk after an equal span of time, the high priests defrocked. It gives perspective to appreciate the lifecycle in this way.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    43. Re:Yawn ... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I could do better on that with one modern desktop with a reasonably current graphics card, and save on power.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    44. Re: Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK go And intent a tablet that can be converted to a car, house, refrigerator, washing machine and etc.

    45. Re:Yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still wonder why ou haven't productized your video-on-demand stuff.

      I seem to recall a /. posting maybe a decade ago where you described a home video-on-demand system that seemed well ahead of commercial offerings at the time; and sounds like you're still at it.

  12. Still no SD card... by snugge · · Score: 1

    Why oh why

    1. Re:Still no SD card... by Eyeball97 · · Score: 1

      Why oh why

      Duh. Because they want "the cloud" to become the new normal.

    2. Re:Still no SD card... by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Think of all the marketing data that will drift up a US network.
      Your face, your friends faces, your family faces, video clips, locations, times, what you pass on the way to work, what you do on weekends..parties..hobbies
      No more taking the card out.
      They want "the NSA cloud" to become the new normal.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Crap ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Oh, sure, I only bought my last gen Nexus 7 about a month ago.

    Bastards!! ;-)

    Oh well, maybe the wife can inherit this one once I decide to splash out on the updated one in a few months or so.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Crap ... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Most/many big box stores have a 14/30 day return policy, if you're feeling exceptionally rude.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  14. Benchmarks were/are incomplete. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I looked at the benchmarks for 15 secondes before I noticed that:
    - iPad used is a 3rd Generation (A5X), and not a iPad 4th Gen (A6)
    - iPhone5 use for benchmarks runs iOS 6.0.1, it should run 6.1.4

    Run the benchmarks with a full complement of hardware/software combination or it looks like a joke.

    1. Re:Benchmarks were/are incomplete. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're going for out of the box comparisons?

      Durrrrrr.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Benchmarks were/are incomplete. by Desler · · Score: 1

      Out of the box iPhone 5 bought any time in the last few months runs 6.1.4. 6.0.1 is from November of last year.

  15. Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 1

    The iPad 3 is coming up on 2 years old. The iPad 4 was released last fall, and would be a much better test.

    1. Re:Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two years? The iPad 3 was released March 2012. That's not even a year and a half ago. In any case what they should be comparing it to for an apples to apples (no pun intended) comparison is the iPad Mini, which has a similar form factor.

    2. Re:Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by Desler · · Score: 1

      He said coming up on 2 years old. Something being over a year old is coming up on 2 years old. Either way, the iPad 3 was discontinued 10 months ago. So as the GP said, comparing to the latest model iPad is a much better test than the 10 month old discontinued model. The only reason for using the iPad 3 seems to be to purposefully make the iPad look worse otherwise why not use the current model iPad versus the current model Nexus 7?

    3. Re:Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 1

      Two years? The iPad 3 was released March 2012. That's not even a year and a half ago. In any case what they should be comparing it to for an apples to apples (no pun intended) comparison is the iPad Mini, which has a similar form factor.

      I agree, and the benchmarks show that the nearly year-old iPad mini does darn well in comparison. The new Nexus 7 isn't a benchmark horse by any means.

      http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph7176/56538.png
      http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph7176/56539.png
      http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph7176/56541.png
      http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph7176/56543.png

    4. Re:Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by Desler · · Score: 1

      "Over a year and a half old".

    5. Re:Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      If you want to compare across brands, it only makes sense to price-match. Isnt he iPad 3 still more expensive than the Nexus 7?

    6. Re: Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You picked the only benchmarks that the mini compares well in--triangle filtrate, which has been Powe VR's forte. The mini gets trounced in the other benchmarks. The N7 is pushing 3x the pixel count as the mini and it's still not close...even in the onscreen benchmarks.

    7. Re:Why does this compare to the iPad 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't make sense to only price-match! How did you get this idea?

      The iPad 4, 3, and mini are more expensive, but if you want to buy something it still makes sense that you know what the more expensive competition is capable off.

      More importantly, the iPad 3 was discontinued and replaced by the 4. It doesn't make sense to compare to a product that is no longer sold, and omit its identically priced replacement.

  16. I couldn't reproduce the benchmarks by tlambert · · Score: 1

    I couldn't reproduce the benchmarks

    Jean-Baptiste Quéru's release wouldn't boot on it... something about there not being any GPU support released by Qualcomm.

  17. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's second generation Nexus 7 seems to be the tablet to beat right now."

    If one ignores the ability to reprogram the device as you wish.

    The whole Qualicom SoC kefuffle is a reason to take a pass.

  18. "New Nexus 7 Factory Images Not Available" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as reported by xda-devs:

    "The bottom line of the factory image drama is simple: We currently have no officially supported way to factory restore our Nexus devices. We don’t know if this will be solved by Google and Qualcomm like it was for the Nexus 4, or if this will remain a longer-standing issue requiring the intervention of an OEM partner, as was the case with the Nexus One."

  19. One thing they fail to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be fast, but it is very prone to "$application is not responding" errors. I've gotten close to chucking it into the wall out of frustration.

  20. Color Calibration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they fix the color calibration of the display? The original Nexus 7 is horrible - all the colors are washed out.

  21. No micro SD slot? by hack++slash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not interested.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:No micro SD slot? by larwe · · Score: 1, Troll

      This. This x1000. And it's so stupid- it's Google arrogance that keeps SD expansion off Nexus devices.

    2. Re:No micro SD slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's google. So I'm not interested. Google is evil. Fuck them and their NSA device. Google is a betrayer.

    3. Re:No micro SD slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to expand that for you:
      It's $anybigco. So I'm not interested. $anybigco is evil. Fuck them and their NSA device. $anybigco is a betrayer.

    4. Re:No micro SD slot? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      You can use a USB drive via a USB on-the-go cable and a few bucks of software. It's not perfect but it gets me by.

  22. Not one complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one mention that this is just as much of a slashvertisement as the articles about Apple and MS products, and those get derided as thinly veiled advertisements.

    So where's the fairness?

    1. Re:Not one complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially considering the Nexus 7 is morphing into an iPad.

  23. Ordered mine and got it yesterday by Cito · · Score: 1

    I also ordered an OTG cable and I attached a 64 gig usb flash drive for extra storage

    also if you download ES File Explorer a free file manager you gain access to all shared computers on the LAN. And you can stream movies across the network with a single touch.

    for MKV streaming get MX Player then go to the XDA website to download the single file you have to put anywhere to enable DTS audio playback, they offered the file seperately since the codec is copyrighted and they couldn't put dts dolby in the app natively without being taken down or sued.

    but they offer the single file on the forum
    http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2156254

    that file plus MX Player will enable MKV with audio support in the Nexus or android for that matter.

    that added with ES Filemanager lets you stream your movies over the lan, or you can stream movies over google drive/dropbox, it also has built in ftp client in the app to stream movies over ftp :P

    im totally loving my new nexus, i picked up the 32 gig model and with the OTG cable + 64 gig flash thumb drive it's amazing

    download Nexus Media Importer for even more fun with the OTG cable and usb devices, you can use usb keyboards, usb hard drives, usb DAC's, usb mic's, etc.

    1. Re:Ordered mine and got it yesterday by larwe · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All these dangling cables are the opposite of an easily portable media consumption experience. The lack of a microSD slot (literally a few pennies in connector costs - support is built into the chipset) is a stupid omission, caused by Google politics.

    2. Re:Ordered mine and got it yesterday by Cito · · Score: 2

      I will agree with you on that, if the nexus 7 2nd gen had a micro sd slot it would be the greatest tablet ever at this moment and no other tablets would even compare.
      Google/Asus hit it out the ballpark with the 2nd gen nexus 7. They do make 1 piece OTG adapters though if you don't want to use an OTG cable

      here is a 1 piece OTG adapter: http://amzn.com/B00BFYH11Q

      it's 1 piece, gives you full usb access to add external drives, you can also use xbox 360 or ps3 controllers to play many games, the FPS is kinda fun now with my xbox controller.

      but I do wish they would have added a sdcard slot, but I can deal with the OTG cable when I need to copy over stuff or whatnot.

      most time though I don't need it since I can use ES File Manager and access all my shared hard drives on the lan and stream/copy files over and even install apk files over the lan. And use remote desktop apps to remote control my desktops and such so while I do miss the sdcard slot, it's not that big of a deal anymore since apps give you access to shared drives on lan, or otg cable or 1 piece otg adapters give you access to external usb devices.

      you can also plug in a 1 piece micro sdcard to usb adapter if you wanted, but it's still good.

      it is a nice piece of hardware, and im not really a fanboi, it's my first android device. my only other mobile device had been a newegg acer 400 dollar laptop bought 3 years ago and an old ipod touch 3rd gen.

      but this new nexus 7 2nd gen is crazy and im kicking myself in the ass for not trying android sooner, it's sooooo much better than iOS on my ipod touch.

    3. Re:Ordered mine and got it yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem is the port is wobbly and on the bottom (lots of apps don't rotate right or dont support rotation) and it's pretty much impossible to use with anything plugged in- its either in the way or the cable falls out.

    4. Re:Ordered mine and got it yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but this new nexus 7 2nd gen is crazy and im kicking myself in the ass for not trying android sooner, it's sooooo much better than iOS on my ipod touch.

      It's better than a four year old device running iOS 5.x. W00t.

  24. Tablet to beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Price/performance of a tablet is for spergs. iPad is the tablet to beat for user experience and quality.

    1. Re:Tablet to beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Apple Fanboi is butt-hurt by existence of better non-ishiny device.

  25. Not a worthy successor by larwe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until Google realizes that storage expansion is a MANDATORY feature of media consumption devices (Used on planes, road trips, and many other places where Internet access is unavailable), no Nexus device is a creditable replacement for anything. The Asus MemoPad HD7, which is the non-bullshit OEM version of the N7 G2, while slower, is a much better device solely for the reason that it has a microSD slot. No microSD slot = no sale.

    1. Re:Not a worthy successor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Until Google realizes that storage expansion is a MANDATORY feature of media consumption devices (Used on planes, road trips, and many other places where Internet access is unavailable), no Nexus device is a creditable replacement for anything. The Asus MemoPad HD7, which is the non-bullshit OEM version of the N7 G2, while slower, is a much better device solely for the reason that it has a microSD slot. No microSD slot = no sale.

      You know why they don't do microSD slots? It's so they don't alienate other tablet manufacturers.

      The official reason is ... ease of use. But seriously, when has google EVER focused on that over geeky-hackability? No. The lack of microSD is to keep android relevant by keeping other OEMs happy.

    2. Re:Not a worthy successor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It has a micro usb port ... a 2$ USB OTG cable and you get access to every usb gadget you can think off, including multi-terrabyte drives, smartphones, camera's, you name it ....
      and you bitch about SD ?

      yes yes .. build in would be better ...
      a tablet unfolding into a 50" 4K tv would be even better too ..

      but untill those are available for 300$ this will do juuuust fine imho

    3. Re:Not a worthy successor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tastes are your own; don't try to pretend that some is "MANDATORY" when quite clearly millions of consumers disagree with you.

    4. Re:Not a worthy successor by lisabeeren · · Score: 1

      Until Google realizes that storage expansion is a MANDATORY feature of media consumption devices

      for some users?

    5. Re:Not a worthy successor by N1AK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until Google realizes that storage expansion is a MANDATORY feature of media consumption devices (Used on planes, road trips, and many other places where Internet access is unavailable), no Nexus device is a creditable replacement for anything.

      How the fuck does this get +5 insightful. iPad = No expansion, iPad mini = No expansion, Nexus 7 = No expansion yet they are all selling very well thank you and I bet sales of portable DVD players are looking pretty pathetic by comparison. They clearly are credible replacements, even if they don't fit some peoples use cases. How full of yourself do you have to be to believe that something not suiting you means it's not going to sell, especially when faced with a shit load of evidence that it already is.

    6. Re:Not a worthy successor by larwe · · Score: 1

      20% of the reason it's +5 Insightful is because of people complaining that a +4 Insightful post doesn't deserve that score? The iOS stuff exists in its own walled-off fetish club. Whatever; I don't own, and likely never will again own, an iOS device. The Nexus 7 competes against other Android tablets. Even the other tablets FROM THE SAME OEM that don't carry the Nexus branding have SD expansion. It's not an optional feature. Google is just trying to drive people to its ho-hum media stores, just as Microsoft is trying to drive people to write Metro-compatible apps with Win8. See how well that's working out for Microsoft on the desktop. Yep. Uh-huh.

    7. Re:Not a worthy successor by larwe · · Score: 1

      Take a quick look at the Android device landscape. Practically all, if not actually all, non-Nexus Android devices have expansion slots.

    8. Re:Not a worthy successor by larwe · · Score: 1

      Dangling plugged-in shit is not a rational solution to the problem. And it's not a price issue - the cost of the connector is under $0.20. The N7 is useless to me at $300 because it limits the amount of media I can carry with me on the road. Sometimes I travel for a week or more at a time. The Asus Memopad HD7 (from the same OEM) is way more useful to me at $150, solely because of the microSD slot.

    9. Re:Not a worthy successor by larwe · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I can fully interpret the implications of this, but it's certainly an interesting viewpoint I never considered before. Thanks.

    10. Re:Not a worthy successor by N1AK · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how it wasn't already obvious to you, but it already had +5 insightful when I posted so unless the people who modded it up are /. time-travellers then your full of shit.

  26. When does a toy become a tool? by tepples · · Score: 2

    No toys for me until the student loan is paid off and my retirement is properly funded.

    But without tools, you can't work to fund your retirement. When exactly does a toy become a tool?

    1. Re:When does a toy become a tool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you can use it to produce a product that you can sell to fund your retirement. It's like, you answered your own question before you even asked it.

  27. Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 2

    The only writable file system for removable media that works with stock Windows XP is FAT, on the modern form of which Microsoft holds patents that won't expire until the end of 2016. These patents have been upheld in both Germany and the United States. Windows Vista adds UDF as another possibility, but the SD Card Association has instead adopted Microsoft's newly patented exFAT for 64 GB and larger cards, and people will expect to be able to eject their exFAT-formatted SDXC cards from a computer and insert them into a mobile device. The easiest way to avoid having to pay Microsoft for a FAT license is not to include a means for external storage on a device in the first place.

    1. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by unrtst · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's a long, complex line of useless excuses.

      There are so many simple solutions.

      When you stick a card in a phone, just have it pop up a "would you like to format this card for this device?" question.

      For compatibility with exFAT, let people buy an app that adds the support.

      if formatted by the phone, stick 2 partitions on it, the first a normal FAT that's tiny (or even dos), and stick FS drivers on it.

      Or just say, no, you can not put the card in a machine. For example, look at the replaceable hard drives in PS3's. That'd give the maker the ability to use any FS they want, and that would even make it more suitable for expanding the local storage, which would make the whole thing more user friendly / transparent to the user.

      Or they could just license it and pay the couple pennies a device (there are already multiple implementations for andoid).

      There are other Android devices that include support and are cheaper (ex. Galaxy Tab 2 7.0), so it's also proven possible and feasible.

      Former posts are right... they just want the cloud.

    2. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot NTFS.

    3. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 2

      That's a long, complex line of useless excuses.

      Sometimes legal arguments take a form that may resemble "a long, complex line of useless excuses" to an outsider, where "so many simple solutions" each have their own distinct flaw.

      When you stick a card in a phone, just have it pop up a "would you like to format this card for this device?" question.

      The problem here is that you can't make it clear enough to an non-expert user (that is, to the majority of users) that this will cause irreversible data loss. First, reformatting from exFAT to something else will cause the user to lose all data stored on the memory card. Second, when the user reinserts the memory card in a Windows PC, Windows will prompt the user to reformat it back to exFAT, again causing the user to lose all data stored on the memory card.

      For compatibility with exFAT, let people buy an app that adds the support.

      Such an app would have to access the SD card as a raw block device. I'm not sure Android even allows an application such low-level access on a device that's not rooted.

      if formatted by the phone, stick 2 partitions on it, the first a normal FAT that's tiny (or even dos), and stick FS drivers on it.

      A FAT partition containing Ext or UDF drivers would have to include the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Ext2 IFS (for Windows) and OSXFUSE with the Ext2 module and some GUI wrapper. Do those all exist, and are those all redistributable? Besides, good luck installing a file system driver if you're not a member of the Administrators group.

      Or just say, no, you can not put the card in a machine. For example, look at the replaceable hard drives in PS3's.

      Isn't the hard drive in a PlayStation 3 console behind screws? That's a lot more effective way to drive home the point that "no, you can not put the card in a machine" than a spring-loaded microSD card slot. To solve this, there'd have to be a closure for the microSD slot that's less convenient to open.

      Or they could just license it and pay the couple pennies a device

      Are you sure the FAT and exFAT royalty is a couple pennies, or is it a couple dollars? I'm willing to consider whatever citation you can provide. But I'm under the impression that Google is trying to keep the price down to compete with the Kindle Fire.

    4. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention NTFS because I was under the impression that NTFS was designed for fixed, not removable, media. Otherwise, Microsoft wouldn't have proposed exFAT in the first place. Besides, if Microsoft holds patents on NTFS, which I believe is likely to be the case, it has the same problem as FAT.

    5. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by andydread · · Score: 1

      With Microsoft and Apple screaming to the US Govt. "OMG FRAND patents should be pennies on the dollar" after suing world+dog with many flimsy software-patents and the govt seeming to swallow their FRAND stories hook, line, and sinker then given that exFAT is a now under FRAND licensing terms all it takes is for some innovative defense team raise that issue in court. Personally i think FRAND patents should be outlawed and standards should not be patent encumbered. Same with software-patents.

    6. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The FAT patents are easy to work around. They only cover the generation of an 8.3 filename from a long filename. Linux avoids them by simply not generating an 8.3 name. Presumably if you tried to read a disk with such files on it in an old ore-LFN version of DOS you might have a problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      if formatted by the phone, stick 2 partitions on it, the first a normal FAT that's tiny (or even dos), and stick FS drivers on it.

      Just say "no" to loading kernel-mode code from someone else's SD card. The potential for malware and potentially phone-bricking bugs is just too high.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    8. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 1

      Just say "no" to loading kernel-mode code from someone else's SD card.

      How is this advice helpful even when the code carries a digital signature showing that "someone else" happens to be the manufacturer of the tablet that you're holding? And why must file systems necessarily run in kernel mode?

    9. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem here is that you can't make it clear enough to an non-expert user (that is, to the majority of users) that this will cause irreversible data loss...

      Well, that has not prevented camera to allow sdcard formatting since...they use flash memory. And the camera users are even less "expert" than phone/tablet ones. I am with the original poster: the microsoft patent is an excuse, it seems google want to actively avoid the possibility for memory extension.

    10. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      If it's coming from the manufacturer of the tablet I'm holding, why would it be on a partition on the SD card instead of included in the ROM? There's no reason to do that unless you want to swap SD cards (and associated filesystem driver binaries) across different devices with subtly different OS versions, which strikes me as a spectacularly bad idea.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    11. Re:Microsoft holds patents on VFAT and exFAT by tepples · · Score: 1

      If it's coming from the manufacturer of the tablet I'm holding, why would it be on a partition on the SD card instead of included in the ROM?

      I think the idea is that the Windows file system driver executable (EXT3VIEW.EXE and HELP.TXT) would be stored in the ROM, and formatting an SD card to Ext3 would copy the Windows driver from the ROM to the first (FAT) partition on the SD card so that the PC's administrator can install it and access the files in the Ext3 partition.

      There's no reason to do that unless you want to swap SD cards

      The goal here is to swap an SD card between a mobile device and a PC running Windows, not necessarily between mobile devices.

  28. Almost nobody wants to reprogram by tepples · · Score: 1

    If one ignores the ability to reprogram the device as you wish.

    There isn't much of a mass market for reprogrammable mobile devices. Case in point: If a significant number of people expected to be able to reprogram devices that they bought, devices whose names start with iP wouldn't have sold so well. It's a niche.

  29. Then let's name and shame by tepples · · Score: 1

    "Application not responding" means whatever application you're using is poorly programmed, that it's doing something on the UI thread that it's supposed to be doing in a worker thread. What are the values of $application that you see?

  30. Microsoft v. TomTom by tepples · · Score: 1

    it's Google arrogance that keeps SD expansion off Nexus devices

    How are you sure it's Google's arrogance and not Microsoft's? Perhaps Google is just trying to avoid another Microsoft v. TomTom.

    1. Re:Microsoft v. TomTom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because someone forces Google to use FAT filesystem. Exactly like someone forces them to use proprietary Qualcomm SoC...

      BTW TomTom trolled MS with their patents before MS sued them about FAT. Good riddance...

    2. Re:Microsoft v. TomTom by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yes, because someone forces Google to use FAT filesystem.

      Microsoft and the SD Card Association force this. If the user removes an SDHC card from a mobile device and inserts it into a PC running Windows, it had better be formatted FAT32, or Windows will "helpfully" ask the user to erase all the data on it and reformat it to FAT32. And for cards 64 GB or bigger, I was under the impression that use of exFAT was part of the SDXC spec.

    3. Re:Microsoft v. TomTom by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Although all of that is true I don't believe it is why devices are moving away from removable storage. If it was then Google could make it use microSD and make getting to and changing it an effort. 90% of people wouldn't bother and those who cared could. The reason they don't support it is they want to move people away from storing the majority of files locally.

    4. Re:Microsoft v. TomTom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they still support USB memory stick insertion, hence the vfat-filesystem is there anyway. Perhaps Google just wants to get the margin by selling their cloud-related stuff for people.

  31. Better than the 200~250 US& chromebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    May well be the best tablet, but is it actually better than the Chromebook (cost~200-250 US$) for the stuff we do the most. To me the Chromebook is the ultimate travel connection device. Small, light, long battery life, able to hook up wifi or mobile and with plenty of USB ports.
    My experience with tablets is that they are only good for browsing not actually doing anything.

    1. Re:Better than the 200~250 US& chromebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity cheap Chromebooks still have such a pathetic display resolution...

  32. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until Android can do low latency audio, it's just a worthless OS to me.

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4.3 fixes that and placed it on par with iOS.

  33. Usability Improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my opinion Google need to improve the usability.
    the improvement between 4.x version is not so big.
    Many people did not need too high specification/ processor speed.
    We need better usability and also better battery life instead of more speed

  34. iPad 3??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Why is the benchmark comparing with iPad 3? Why not iPad 4 and iPad mini?

    iPad 4 has :
      Geekbench of around 1780 (vs. iPad 3 at 756).
      Sunspider at 834.7 (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6472/ipad-4-late-2012-review/4)
      Compared to the iPad 3, has a 10% higher OpenGL fill rate. Almost 50% higher OpenGL triangle performance. Double the Egypt FPS. (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6472/ipad-4-late-2012-review/4)

    It seems like the iPad 4 would beat the Nexus 7 (2013) in everything, so why did they omit it from the benchmarks? Is this a conspiracy or bad journalism?

    The iPad mini seems to have performance equivalent to iPad 3.

  35. It's a brick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A development device where you can't run Open Android...

    Not nice...

  36. No factory image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as there is not a factory image available, no way to install a custom ROM, and no SD card slot, I am not buying.

    1. Re:No factory image by P-niiice · · Score: 1

      I felt that way, and I don't want to infer that you don't need it, but I'm having trouble filling 32gb Nexus with all of the cloud services out there. And if you use ES file manager, you can't tell them apart from local storage - you can even stream movies from them. Also, you know ROMs are coming for this.

  37. MIDI Support by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    I love my Nexus, but Android devs needs to get off their asses and produce some good midi apps. Now that the IRig wirks with Android devices, we can have this. Otherwise, I'm going to have to go to the dark side and get a MacBook or Ipad to take on stage for this purpose.

  38. Products that can be produced using a tablet by tepples · · Score: 1

    My point is that I can think of a lot of products that can be produced using an Android tablet at some step. The most obvious is developing Android applications and testing them on the tablet. But there are others, such as carrying a tablet to compose music whenever inspiration hits you.

  39. The invalid short name design-around by tepples · · Score: 1

    Linux avoids them by simply not generating an 8.3 name.

    I've read about a patch by Andrew Tridgell implementing a design-around to generate 8.3 filler names that are not valid filenames. Has this patch made it into mainline Linux? And has this design-around been tested in any court?

  40. Nexus 7 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Don't they still support USB memory stick insertion

    No. I just connected a PNY 4 GB flash drive through a USB OTG cable to my first-generation Nexus 7 running Android 4.3, and it didn't show up in the file manager. I'm under the impression that I'd first need to root the device and buy StickMount.

    1. Re:Nexus 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy? I'm running a Cyanogenmod nightly and I have an SSD I plug in through OTG which is seen without issues. Paid like $4 for the cable, nothing else. Granted, the connector is 90 degrees the wrong direction for my dock, and tends to slip a bit causing "unexpected storage disconnection" messages, but there's nothing that says you have to pay money for the software bit.

  41. Nexus tablets are a good value for frugal folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the hardware specs of the Nexus tablets and compare them to the other possible tablets you might buy. You'll notice the Nexus tablets do provide a high value per dollar. This is important for a device that does not have user replaceable batteries. Soon (frugal folks consider several years to be 'soon'; we hate spending our hard to earn, democrat deflated dollars!) its' battery will fail and you'll be at the point of either replacing it, repairing it, or living without this type of device. By that point, the world may have moved on to the next great thing rather than a tablet!

    Look at how soon the device will receive software updates. Remember PPPYPS - Prudent (frequent & soon) Patching Protects Your Personal Stuff! Good grief look at how slow the other tablets are updated. Slow patching and slow update cycles put you at risk. For the tech heads out there the alternative could be to constantly update your rooted device with an alternative ROM like CyanogenMod. Not for the novice or typical, non techy, end user.

    Compare it to the Chromebooks. Quite frankly, I don't see enough business or enterprise apps or security for the Chrome OS devices. I see more development in the areas of business, enterprise security, and access to the hardware of the device with Android.

    Compare them to the Windows 8.x tablets. If you do not need Windows applications, then you'll see the Windows devices are still too costly when comparing them to other general purpose, general use, tablets.

    Compare them to the iPads. This is perhaps the best comparison from an applications standpoint, unless you need access to the hardware - like a MIDI or musical / audio interface application. Problem here is the apple tax - the increased cost of the device, a device that will have a short life-time of support from the manufacturer. Remember, apple loves to obsolete devices thorough the frequent lack of support in future releases of its' OS. For use frugal folks, unless we need an application that specifically used the iPad hardware, the cost to purchase and the relatively short life-span ( in years) is to high a cost.

    Remember, there are too many of us out here that have to spend our limited money wisely. Many of us are paying down the debt the democrats have convinced us we must have in order to have our electronics, cars, education, etc. We are trying to get out of debt, fund retirement, save for our childrens' education, save for the impending disaster that is obamacare (b. o. don't care!), etc.

    So I stick by my opinion the Nexus devices are a very good value for most folks!

  42. Re:Nexus tablets are a good value for frugal folks by xtronics · · Score: 1

    The right question is if one can install a proper Linux distro without a layer in between the hardware and linux?

  43. Re:Nexus tablets are a good value for frugal folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is right! If you have been through Financial Peace University and graduated then you'll understand his point of view!!

    And further up the thread is a discussion of using a USB On The Go cable to access additional off-line storage and devices! Remember, these devices are meant to be cloud based devices. Either with an LTE, Wi-Fi, teathered to your phone or connected to a cellular based WiFi hot-spot, etc. Even apple no longer sells the hard drive based ipod!

  44. Re:Not Buying it - You silly democrat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You silly democrat! The device is most certainly rootable! http://androidadvices.com/root-nexus-7-2013-jellybean-43-android-firmware-guide/

    Stop believing the lies the democrats keep spewing out of their mouths!

  45. Re:Not Buying it - You silly democrat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also: Also: http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/07/26/twrp-recovery-released-for-the-2013-nexus-7-easy-root-via-supersu-just-one-zip-file-away/

  46. Not IA64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be a pedant, but those Xeons are AMD64, unless there are itanium derived xeons i'm not aware of(in which case the hardware's even less useful than it at first appears)

  47. Stock N7 ROM vs. CyanogenMod by tepples · · Score: 1

    Buy?

    Yes, buy. Android as shipped on the first-generation N7 recognizes a USB keyboard through my OTG cable but not a flash drive. OUYA recognizes a flash drive, and you say CyanogenMod does, but perhaps Google left it out of Android for Nexus 7 because patents. I could switch to CM 10.1.2, but then I'd need to buy a backup and restore program so that I don't lose what I have stored on the N7. I seem to remember Helium Backup charging for key features.