N important difference, when leaving Christianity for something else their hell no longer scares.
When leaving Islam the Sharia allows all kinds of nasty punishments to you by the remaining believers right here on earth.
I see your information is from the tabloids only.
Why do you think these people come to the UK? It's not for fantastic health care, the great housing or transport system, all these things are way better in other NW European countries.
They come because there are contrary to other EU countries very few limits to getting benefits from the bat and the very low minimum wage makes them interesting to employers.
These issues could have easily been fixed at Westminster if it weren't for the total control by Tory supporting cheap-ass employers.
Have a look at the numbers of EU citizen v.s. those from Commonwealth countries that make up the immigrants, the problems you refer to are mainly caused by the latter, not the first.
Also, any erosion of living standards in the UK is only for those in the lower and middle income brackets, an ages old UK classes problem where the Upper Classes are doing just fine.
I feel sorry for your situation.
But read your rant, which type of shortcomings caused your issues, open borders or bad laws favouring employers instead of employees?
Your problem is not open borders, it is the employers of illegal immigrants that are not prosecuted.
Hehe, you are funny:)
Granted, in the EU there is a need for more democracy but Brexit brings it closer.
Historically only two countries have adamantly refused to seceded more power from the EU commission to the EU parliament and after the Brexit there is only one left, France.
Please note, I'm not saying the EU commission is lacking democracy, after all it works like the governments in many democratic nations in that the members are appointed and controlled by democratically elected governments.
Don't believe the crap you read in (Murdoch controlled) British tabloids.
European countries have not surrendered the control over their borders to others, they have moved border protection from internal to external.
What went wrong and can be easily fixed, is they forgot to improve and finance the border controls of the outer countries.
And where to do you want to deport them?
The great majority of these countries refuse entry to those that don't want. (or not have a relevant passport, birth certificate etc.)
Exactly, these are the ones the Brexiteers are complaining about but they have jack shit to do with the EU.
The claim EU regulations make it impossible or difficult to expel them is bull, it is their own British laws that need fixing plus you can never send someone to a country that doesn't want them.
I don't any longer feel for contributing to their economy when they make it difficult to get in.
My Pension date will be January 2018 so I can quit their new society of scare for and fear of their neighbours before it becomes problematic.
Not that I believe they will impose great barriers to EU citizen, even in the Maggie Thatcher days there were no real issues getting in.
The Bexiteers say they want to improve their standards of living by removing the EU rules and workers, well let me say there isn't a single employer in the UK that would hire an EU worker if he couldn't make money that way. Or more money than by employing a British national.
The underlying issue of the Brexit campaign is the same as Trumps Make America Great Again, the portion of the population that has a lack of Self-respect. For some reason they feel (in their own country!) inferior to their foreign born fellow citizen.
Something that has been instilled in parts of the British people by years of reading the tabloids that were full of nonsensical stories about crooked cucumbers and outsiders living of the meagre UK benefits. And other elements of the media that have never bothered much to set right these ridiculous misconceptions.
The bottom line is I feel sorry for the enlightened Brits and the Europeans that had a good commercial relation with them.
Yes, the state has an obligation.
Some of these glasses might even be criminally deficient and law enforcement needs to act.
But that would be after the fact, damage was already done, therefore a caring society has a government that sets and enforces safety standards.
If not, Obamacare will make you pick up part of the bill:)
You have a point re. the hanging cables.
Luckily there are options like shielding and the use of DC, also, they are relatively short and their radiation will be localised only.
The long distance hi-power cables that connect Norway, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands and in the future Iceland use DC as it is more efficient.
Especially in the North Sea these cables can and often are trenched into the sea bed.
I oppose them because plans for and the cost of decommissioning them is not part of the budget planning.
Get your legal system fixed!
Also, there are environmental concerns not well researched and understood yet, like underseas power cables and their impact on oceanic marine life with electrical sensory organs. Sharks have displayed problems from low voltage underseas cables, even when quite thickly insulated. It may well be ok, but I still want a bit more research before jumping on something because ooh windcraft!
Underwater power cables exists for many years, probably for over a century, and the technology plus environmental impact is well understood.
Wind is allowed to be abandoned, with rusted towers left in place. Sometimes they are required to tear down to a "grey-field" standard, where the towers and above ground structures must be removed but the buried concrete anchors can remain.
You must live in a weird and unusually slack judiciary.
In other words, this part of your worries/opposition to wind power has nothing to do with a shortcoming in the industry but everything with a shortcoming in your legal system.
Additionally, land must be extremely cheap when the owners just let it lay fallow.
Where I live the ~25 y/o turbines, in the day the largest on shore wind farm in Europe, were removed after new rows of nearly 200 meter giants were put alongside them. http://www.windparknoordoostpo...
It's important to consider the goals of the GPL. You get great Free Software, but it's not a gift. It is sharing with rules that must be followed. You are required to keep it Free. And one of the implied purposes of the GPL is to cause more great Free Software to be made. This means that derivative works that are not shared really go against the purpose as well as the wording of the GPL.
Amen, it's especially through the GPL that future developers are enabled to stand on the shoulders of the present.
Nothing gets lost, we all win.
They are, a few minutes into the call I typically ask them whether their mother is proud to have brought up a criminal and before they hang up the usual reply is "Fuck you".
Sorry for the late reply but yes there is such a get-out clause.
Would you be caught in the wrong kind of uniform you are already done, fighting for a non-recognised army automatically brings you in that league.
Civilians are a class of non-combatants that are protected by the convention, a guy in civvies working as a spy is not.
You can issue any kind of warrant.
But it remains illegal to send EU data to the US without an EU court order.
This is not about the physical servers or their location, it is about the data protected by EU privacy law
The solution is simple, the US applies in the EU for such an order and they'll get the data.
A little obstacle is the US would have to show cause, the present action shows that's what is lacking...
It's a sad thing what happened at Gitmo but these guys were illegal combatants, they were not members of a regulated army and thus the Geneva Convention did not apply.
The fact the USofA did not show any moral standing is another matter...
This is a very fast browser but with limited options like no tabs.
But it is a very new development, we'll see where it leads.
For some people it might have it's uses.
As the promo says it's 30% more efficient than the one+3T which is better than the one+3.
I have the one+3 and it has sufficient power to watch a full movie.
But to be sure I also bought a €10.- external power pack, during a recent 7hrs flight the cute girl next to me ran out of juice on her fancy Samsung so I borrowed here the power, I still had enough at the end of the flight.
Never the less, I sure wished they'd add 1 or 2 mm of thickness for a much larger battery!
Slashdot Mirror
N important difference, when leaving Christianity for something else their hell no longer scares.
When leaving Islam the Sharia allows all kinds of nasty punishments to you by the remaining believers right here on earth.
Then get it fixed!
Remember, like the problem that fix isn't at the border.
I see your information is from the tabloids only.
Why do you think these people come to the UK? It's not for fantastic health care, the great housing or transport system, all these things are way better in other NW European countries.
They come because there are contrary to other EU countries very few limits to getting benefits from the bat and the very low minimum wage makes them interesting to employers.
These issues could have easily been fixed at Westminster if it weren't for the total control by Tory supporting cheap-ass employers.
Have a look at the numbers of EU citizen v.s. those from Commonwealth countries that make up the immigrants, the problems you refer to are mainly caused by the latter, not the first.
Also, any erosion of living standards in the UK is only for those in the lower and middle income brackets, an ages old UK classes problem where the Upper Classes are doing just fine.
I feel sorry for your situation.
But read your rant, which type of shortcomings caused your issues, open borders or bad laws favouring employers instead of employees? Your problem is not open borders, it is the employers of illegal immigrants that are not prosecuted.
Hehe, you are funny :)
Granted, in the EU there is a need for more democracy but Brexit brings it closer.
Historically only two countries have adamantly refused to seceded more power from the EU commission to the EU parliament and after the Brexit there is only one left, France.
Please note, I'm not saying the EU commission is lacking democracy, after all it works like the governments in many democratic nations in that the members are appointed and controlled by democratically elected governments.
Don't believe the crap you read in (Murdoch controlled) British tabloids.
Your choice of words is amusing.
And in essence sadly correct.
European countries have not surrendered the control over their borders to others, they have moved border protection from internal to external.
What went wrong and can be easily fixed, is they forgot to improve and finance the border controls of the outer countries.
One way only, the other way, out of Islam, is strictly haram/ haloof, forbidden by the sharia.
And where to do you want to deport them?
The great majority of these countries refuse entry to those that don't want. (or not have a relevant passport, birth certificate etc.)
Travel to the USofA and you can see for yourself.
The influence of the extreme conservative churches is scary.
Exactly, these are the ones the Brexiteers are complaining about but they have jack shit to do with the EU.
The claim EU regulations make it impossible or difficult to expel them is bull, it is their own British laws that need fixing plus you can never send someone to a country that doesn't want them.
I don't any longer feel for contributing to their economy when they make it difficult to get in.
My Pension date will be January 2018 so I can quit their new society of scare for and fear of their neighbours before it becomes problematic.
Not that I believe they will impose great barriers to EU citizen, even in the Maggie Thatcher days there were no real issues getting in.
The Bexiteers say they want to improve their standards of living by removing the EU rules and workers, well let me say there isn't a single employer in the UK that would hire an EU worker if he couldn't make money that way. Or more money than by employing a British national.
The underlying issue of the Brexit campaign is the same as Trumps Make America Great Again, the portion of the population that has a lack of Self-respect. For some reason they feel (in their own country!) inferior to their foreign born fellow citizen.
Something that has been instilled in parts of the British people by years of reading the tabloids that were full of nonsensical stories about crooked cucumbers and outsiders living of the meagre UK benefits. And other elements of the media that have never bothered much to set right these ridiculous misconceptions.
The bottom line is I feel sorry for the enlightened Brits and the Europeans that had a good commercial relation with them.
Yes, the state has an obligation. :)
Some of these glasses might even be criminally deficient and law enforcement needs to act.
But that would be after the fact, damage was already done, therefore a caring society has a government that sets and enforces safety standards.
If not, Obamacare will make you pick up part of the bill
You have a point re. the hanging cables.
Luckily there are options like shielding and the use of DC, also, they are relatively short and their radiation will be localised only.
The long distance hi-power cables that connect Norway, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands and in the future Iceland use DC as it is more efficient.
Especially in the North Sea these cables can and often are trenched into the sea bed.
I oppose them because plans for and the cost of decommissioning them is not part of the budget planning.
Get your legal system fixed!
Also, there are environmental concerns not well researched and understood yet, like underseas power cables and their impact on oceanic marine life with electrical sensory organs. Sharks have displayed problems from low voltage underseas cables, even when quite thickly insulated. It may well be ok, but I still want a bit more research before jumping on something because ooh windcraft!
Underwater power cables exists for many years, probably for over a century, and the technology plus environmental impact is well understood.
Wind is allowed to be abandoned, with rusted towers left in place. Sometimes they are required to tear down to a "grey-field" standard, where the towers and above ground structures must be removed but the buried concrete anchors can remain.
You must live in a weird and unusually slack judiciary.
In other words, this part of your worries/opposition to wind power has nothing to do with a shortcoming in the industry but everything with a shortcoming in your legal system.
Additionally, land must be extremely cheap when the owners just let it lay fallow.
Where I live the ~25 y/o turbines, in the day the largest on shore wind farm in Europe, were removed after new rows of nearly 200 meter giants were put alongside them.
http://www.windparknoordoostpo...
It's important to consider the goals of the GPL. You get great Free Software, but it's not a gift. It is sharing with rules that must be followed. You are required to keep it Free. And one of the implied purposes of the GPL is to cause more great Free Software to be made. This means that derivative works that are not shared really go against the purpose as well as the wording of the GPL.
Amen, it's especially through the GPL that future developers are enabled to stand on the shoulders of the present.
Nothing gets lost, we all win.
Indeed, as we know free is not gratis.
The GPL keeps the existing software and its derivatives free to use by and for all.
They are, a few minutes into the call I typically ask them whether their mother is proud to have brought up a criminal and before they hang up the usual reply is "Fuck you".
Sorry for the late reply but yes there is such a get-out clause.
Would you be caught in the wrong kind of uniform you are already done, fighting for a non-recognised army automatically brings you in that league.
Civilians are a class of non-combatants that are protected by the convention, a guy in civvies working as a spy is not.
You can issue any kind of warrant.
But it remains illegal to send EU data to the US without an EU court order.
This is not about the physical servers or their location, it is about the data protected by EU privacy law
The solution is simple, the US applies in the EU for such an order and they'll get the data.
A little obstacle is the US would have to show cause, the present action shows that's what is lacking...
It's a sad thing what happened at Gitmo but these guys were illegal combatants, they were not members of a regulated army and thus the Geneva Convention did not apply.
The fact the USofA did not show any moral standing is another matter...
This is a very fast browser but with limited options like no tabs.
But it is a very new development, we'll see where it leads.
For some people it might have it's uses.
As the promo says it's 30% more efficient than the one+3T which is better than the one+3.
I have the one+3 and it has sufficient power to watch a full movie.
But to be sure I also bought a €10.- external power pack, during a recent 7hrs flight the cute girl next to me ran out of juice on her fancy Samsung so I borrowed here the power, I still had enough at the end of the flight.
Never the less, I sure wished they'd add 1 or 2 mm of thickness for a much larger battery!
I've not seen such notifications, just a mail.
It might depend in which jurisdiction you are, I'm in the EU.