Never going to happen. Nice to have dreams, but you know it's not possible, right?
You can't program your way to Low Earth Orbit. You can't Kevlar your way to the Moon.
That's the difference between the early 20th century and now.
You troll.
The only thing changed since the advent of space travel is that we are no longer willing to take a great risk.
A volcano exists thanks to a particular diameter to depth/length relation of it's 'hole' or central vent.
Would it be wider large areas would be consumed but the pressure would be negligent, would it be narrower the lava would have cooled down and solidified well before reaching surface.
A bore hole is extremely narrow, at these depths a typical diameter of a few inches only and the lava's viscosity would increase the moment it would start to rise, solidifying and plugging the hole before getting anywhere near surface.
The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates.
Merrill Lynch $373,595
Citigroup Inc $322,051
Morgan Stanley $273,452
Goldman Sachs $230,095
JPMorgan Chase & Co $228,107
US Government $208,379
AT&T Inc $201,438
Wachovia Corp $195,063
UBS AG $192,493
Credit Suisse Group $183,353
PricewaterhouseCoopers $167,900
US Army $167,820
Bank of America $166,026
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher $159,596
Blank Rome LLP $154,226
Greenberg Traurig LLP $146,437
US Dept of Defense $144,105
FedEx Corp $131,974
Bear Stearns $117,498
Lehman Brothers $114,357
Next time forget about voting, just tally the contributions.
I mean the ratio of artists, those that come up with novel/creative ideas, is not depending on education.
Of course the fruits of creativity are going to depend on the level and extend of education.
Although you can get an academic title by 'just' having a great memory it'll be your creativity that eventually sets your academic standing.
And yes I feel there are more creative artists in academia than in technical or artisan education.
For the person in the article, from some of the posts I've read here he is of an unusual kind and time will tell, Einstein did most of his great work early in his career.
You have a negative approach that could even be construed as jealousy.
Any society should not waste it's resources and that's what is happening in the present USofA.
The country as a whole could gain a lot when all had a fair chance at the best education, history shows the returns on investment are obvious.
Check out the outcome of the Nuremberg trials, I know the USofA does since Bush-v2 not give a shit about international treaties and the Geneva Treaties but still:
I'm afraid you are right, so few understand the intricacies of a network. I work with quite smart engineers and when the company addressed the slowdown of our connection we were requested to stop using streaming services.
A couple of them came together and suggested we could all listen to the same radio station to limit bandwidth used...
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe that's why there'll be a WinXP SP4 coming out tomorrow?
The type of rocket is very secondary, we know these are going to be long trips.
And yes, this would be a great step for mankind.
Damn it's true, you've got 26 broken keys!
Never going to happen. Nice to have dreams, but you know it's not possible, right?
You can't program your way to Low Earth Orbit. You can't Kevlar your way to the Moon.
That's the difference between the early 20th century and now.
You troll.
The only thing changed since the advent of space travel is that we are no longer willing to take a great risk.
He missed infra red and bluetooth ;)
The Parliaments own mail system likely only handles a fraction of the total mail.
Privacy laws would get in the way of this business model so leaving the US is not an option.
Some brands you can't take the battery out, they are obviously in bed with the cops.
Knowing rig owners they'll have a BOP in place when drilling at suspect depths.
Besides, it's not operated by BP :)
Would it be wider large areas would be consumed but the pressure would be negligent, would it be narrower the lava would have cooled down and solidified well before reaching surface.
A bore hole is extremely narrow, at these depths a typical diameter of a few inches only and the lava's viscosity would increase the moment it would start to rise, solidifying and plugging the hole before getting anywhere near surface.
That's on Kubuntu 32bit.
It's also known as innovation and many years ago the US excelled in it.
It was the relying on a single source of, especially, foreign energy.
The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates.
Ah that's why McCain lost:
Merrill Lynch $373,595
Citigroup Inc $322,051
Morgan Stanley $273,452
Goldman Sachs $230,095
JPMorgan Chase & Co $228,107
US Government $208,379
AT&T Inc $201,438
Wachovia Corp $195,063
UBS AG $192,493
Credit Suisse Group $183,353
PricewaterhouseCoopers $167,900
US Army $167,820
Bank of America $166,026
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher $159,596
Blank Rome LLP $154,226
Greenberg Traurig LLP $146,437
US Dept of Defense $144,105
FedEx Corp $131,974
Bear Stearns $117,498
Lehman Brothers $114,357
Next time forget about voting, just tally the contributions.
Sure there are options like multicast or a proxy but those are not our core business so it would never be implemented.
And as you say, the LAN will still have to handle all the separate streams.
The problem I noticed is our engineers thought of the internet as a sort of coax cable where there's one signal that many can tack onto.
Of course the fruits of creativity are going to depend on the level and extend of education.
Although you can get an academic title by 'just' having a great memory it'll be your creativity that eventually sets your academic standing.
And yes I feel there are more creative artists in academia than in technical or artisan education.
For the person in the article, from some of the posts I've read here he is of an unusual kind and time will tell, Einstein did most of his great work early in his career.
You have a negative approach that could even be construed as jealousy.
Any society should not waste it's resources and that's what is happening in the present USofA.
The country as a whole could gain a lot when all had a fair chance at the best education, history shows the returns on investment are obvious.
Thanks.
They got what they paid for?
And whether you like it or not this is data transmitted on public waves, similar to an audible conversation in the middle of the mall.
Yet historically you will find more artists (creative) among academics then among even the most skilled engineers.
Judging by his work I would place the person of the story in the class of creative academics.
The poor guy is homeschooled!
Whatever the advantages of good supervision in the home are, they are outweighed by the lack of day long interaction with others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions
A couple of them came together and suggested we could all listen to the same radio station to limit bandwidth used...