On the other hand, a world where billionaires can functionally drive media sources into bankruptcy by proxy lawsuits is potentially incredibly chilling on free speech.
And if they stuck to issues that pertained to free speech then said billionaire would never have had a chance.
Everyone wants to sit to get off as soon as possible, so under this system the first people in would flock to the back and not block up people just trying to get on.
Huh? Since when does getting on first or last have anything to do with seat selection? The seats at the front are most popular due to them being significantly quieter.
You cannot stand to be away from your partner for the three or four minutes this would take?!
Nope you missed the point. It's not the separation from the partner it's the access to a potential combined bag.
As for kids could navigate just fine. You could have just said you don't have kids. It would have been shorter to write.
Oh and good now you also added exceptions to the rule. How about we just go all out and write a 10 page manual on how to board a plane. I mean people have shown they're not even able to cope with the simple system of priority. The airports that use group based loading already turn the queue into a clusterfuck, let's just make it even more complicated!
Don't apply military knowledge to common civilian situations. If often does not end well.
Again don't assume military rules apply. People can't even follow simple rules like group loading or not standing in the priority lane. Do you honestly thing the hordes would cope with not only column based loading, but then also exceptions to the rule?
You one of the red Vs blue fuckwits who think everything is better just because your colour is in power. You are part of the problem of you think this has anything to do with where someone did on the political compass.
No no no no. You don't understand. Having every scene shot in the same form factor with the same focal length with the same off exposure is not "amateur" it's "artistic".
He says he can't go back to traditional movie making. Well after trying to create tension on a single focal length it makes me wonder if he was ever able to.
The author doesn't realise all the proposed "fixes" are already in place in airlines all over the world and have done absolutely nothing to make the experience better. I could have checked my carryon today, but why would I? The cost is nothing compared to the 30min wait when I get to my destination for the bag to come out.
I actually like the process some airlines have where they tag your carry on if you checked a bag. The tag guarantees you can put it in the overhead bin with priority over someone who hasn't checked a bag. Make the people who are cheaping out suffer a bit.
I was on a flight to London last week and some lady came in with her thick carry on crammed over head and then proceeded to put her duty free, and her coat under the seat. She then turned to me with a pleading look with her handbag and motioned to my leg space "Do you mind?". "Yes I do, stay away from my space." She seemed shocked that someone wouldn't give up their space for a self-obsessed asshat who refused to check a bag.
*Posted from Heathrow Terminal 5. (Still a shithole).
Of course they don't want their precious first class people waiting longer
A plane which offers first class would never cause that class of people to block the commoners getting on. They are completely segregated for a reason.
Yeah great idea. Split up families with small kids, partners who put things into each other's bags. Please don't apply military knowledge to common civilian situations. It often does not end well.
So the solution to the problem is to double down on the already absurd overuse of police force that the USA suffers from, opening them up to lawsuits from a very wealthy company in the process?
GREAT IDEA!
Better idea. Just fine them as the code allows for each false call.
That mistake made the car popular to the point of having difficulty fulfilling orders. What you call a mistake, Tesla calls a strategy that has made it one of the most valuable car companies in the industry, and THE most valuable one based on the number of cars produced.
Electricity is incredibly cheap especially in the USA, and the realisation was clear from the beginning: The vast majority of owners do not use superchargers even though they are free. Any why would the, they can just top up at home.
Most of the other automakers have chosen various proprietary connectors and charging standards.
Actually all of the other automakers have chosen various open standard connectors and charging standards that are free to use. The problem is that at the time of Tesla's main expansion these other charging stations were incredibly limited in charging capability.
If anyone needed a practical real world example of the filthiest scum circle jerking while they slowly ruin the country, this is it. I expect Trump to come in and serenade them both with a speech on tax cuts.
Why on earth would anyone other than the people directly responsible for patching a security flaw get told about a security flaw. That is the entire point of moratoriums and the whole responsible disclosure business.
The government has no business knowing. Oh and despite the fact that this seems to have hit the popular news today, we actually already covered this here on Slashdot. https://it.slashdot.org/story/... I think I need to buy a lottery ticket.
So while you're laughing, name the corporate systems that have been removed without an way to migrate the data. I'll wait, but I'm sure you won't answer.
On the flip side one of my current jobs is doing quite the opposite. A cloud vendor decided to completely depreciate one product in favour of another that we determined didn't suit our needs. We've already received multiple database dumps, and I'm expecting a copy of all reportable data by next week, just as was stipulated in the exit clause of our contract.
Contracts for those of you who've never heard of them are the things that make you stop laughing and realise how stupid you really are, either when you realise companies typically abide by them or when the lawyers actually come knocking on the door.
Now go back to complaining about Google Reader no longer working where you belong little man.
Nobody has been saying that about cloud services since the dawn of IT.
Nope, but people have been saying it about {insert new thing}.
Because I'm one of the cost analysts in my firm I can tell you that 99% reliability means almost 21 hours of down time per year, and that would cost us about 950,000 man hours of productivity (or a little over $47 million in lost labor costs).
Oh, implying that 100% of the time 100% of your work is done in an office application? You're not very good at these estimates.
LOLOLOLOL. Found the gullible millenial.
You're not good at guessing ages either. Maybe you should leave the numbers game to others.
how about the fact that you more likely to be killed on a commercial airline than you are in a mass shooting
And the amount of effort we put into ensuring every death is investigated and systems are put in place to prevent occurrence on an aircraft should really put it all into perspective.
Oh wait that wasn't the comparison you were looking for was it? Too bad.
Police in parts of the world where guns aren't so readily available are nowhere near as trigger happy.
I saw a documentary one day where they had an American police officer tail a Swedish police officer for a few days. They discussed how each of them approach various situations in the day to day lives. The American couldn't believe that simply removing the gun from the glovebox in the police car would incur an incredible amount of paperwork, regardless if the gun was used.
They did at one point have a hostage situation where the perpetrator did have a gun. The Swedish officer went up and talked to the guy for about 10min after which the victim was let go and kept talking to the guy who was at that point at risk of self harming. Post action interview the American said his default would be to take cover somewhere within range of the situation with his gun drawn.
Was it sensationalised? Probably. The truth is usually somewhere in the middle on these kinds of things, but even the middleground is still a stark contrast to policing in America.
College is un-affordable, school shootings on the rise, we're at 8 wars an counting and AI is going to decimate the job market in the next 20 years... and they pick mobile device addiction to worry about.
Or maybe half of parents pick something they can control to worry about. Or maybe most people in the world can focus on more than one problem at a time.
Oh I didn't realise that cars were the only thing that cars crash into. Makes sense though. People have never backed into poles, trees, people, the end of their garage or any other stationary object.
Slashdot Mirror
On the other hand, a world where billionaires can functionally drive media sources into bankruptcy by proxy lawsuits is potentially incredibly chilling on free speech.
And if they stuck to issues that pertained to free speech then said billionaire would never have had a chance.
Everyone wants to sit to get off as soon as possible, so under this system the first people in would flock to the back and not block up people just trying to get on.
Huh? Since when does getting on first or last have anything to do with seat selection? The seats at the front are most popular due to them being significantly quieter.
You cannot stand to be away from your partner for the three or four minutes this would take?!
Nope you missed the point. It's not the separation from the partner it's the access to a potential combined bag.
As for kids could navigate just fine. You could have just said you don't have kids. It would have been shorter to write.
Oh and good now you also added exceptions to the rule. How about we just go all out and write a 10 page manual on how to board a plane. I mean people have shown they're not even able to cope with the simple system of priority. The airports that use group based loading already turn the queue into a clusterfuck, let's just make it even more complicated!
Don't apply military knowledge to common civilian situations. If often does not end well.
Again don't assume military rules apply. People can't even follow simple rules like group loading or not standing in the priority lane. Do you honestly thing the hordes would cope with not only column based loading, but then also exceptions to the rule?
You one of the red Vs blue fuckwits who think everything is better just because your colour is in power. You are part of the problem of you think this has anything to do with where someone did on the political compass.
No no no no. You don't understand. Having every scene shot in the same form factor with the same focal length with the same off exposure is not "amateur" it's "artistic".
He says he can't go back to traditional movie making. Well after trying to create tension on a single focal length it makes me wonder if he was ever able to.
Obligatory Dilbert: http://dilbert.com/strip/2017-...
Two options:
1) Don't sudo.
2) su root. Then run npm --help.
The problem only occurs if a normal users invokes npm via sudo.
You are conflating the latest version, which is generally unstable and full of potential zero days, with security patches,
And with 99% of software on the market they are one and the same and therefore should be conflated.
The author doesn't realise all the proposed "fixes" are already in place in airlines all over the world and have done absolutely nothing to make the experience better. I could have checked my carryon today, but why would I? The cost is nothing compared to the 30min wait when I get to my destination for the bag to come out.
I actually like the process some airlines have where they tag your carry on if you checked a bag. The tag guarantees you can put it in the overhead bin with priority over someone who hasn't checked a bag. Make the people who are cheaping out suffer a bit.
I was on a flight to London last week and some lady came in with her thick carry on crammed over head and then proceeded to put her duty free, and her coat under the seat. She then turned to me with a pleading look with her handbag and motioned to my leg space "Do you mind?". "Yes I do, stay away from my space." She seemed shocked that someone wouldn't give up their space for a self-obsessed asshat who refused to check a bag.
*Posted from Heathrow Terminal 5. (Still a shithole).
Of course they don't want their precious first class people waiting longer
A plane which offers first class would never cause that class of people to block the commoners getting on. They are completely segregated for a reason.
2. Load back-to-front BY COLUMN.
Yeah great idea. Split up families with small kids, partners who put things into each other's bags. Please don't apply military knowledge to common civilian situations. It often does not end well.
So the solution to the problem is to double down on the already absurd overuse of police force that the USA suffers from, opening them up to lawsuits from a very wealthy company in the process?
GREAT IDEA!
Better idea. Just fine them as the code allows for each false call.
That mistake made the car popular to the point of having difficulty fulfilling orders. What you call a mistake, Tesla calls a strategy that has made it one of the most valuable car companies in the industry, and THE most valuable one based on the number of cars produced.
Electricity is incredibly cheap especially in the USA, and the realisation was clear from the beginning: The vast majority of owners do not use superchargers even though they are free. Any why would the, they can just top up at home.
Most of the other automakers have chosen various proprietary connectors and charging standards.
Actually all of the other automakers have chosen various open standard connectors and charging standards that are free to use. The problem is that at the time of Tesla's main expansion these other charging stations were incredibly limited in charging capability.
If anyone needed a practical real world example of the filthiest scum circle jerking while they slowly ruin the country, this is it. I expect Trump to come in and serenade them both with a speech on tax cuts.
Why on earth would anyone other than the people directly responsible for patching a security flaw get told about a security flaw. That is the entire point of moratoriums and the whole responsible disclosure business.
The government has no business knowing. Oh and despite the fact that this seems to have hit the popular news today, we actually already covered this here on Slashdot. https://it.slashdot.org/story/... I think I need to buy a lottery ticket.
Yes I can see that. Its a very good machine to have at my disposal.
So while you're laughing, name the corporate systems that have been removed without an way to migrate the data. I'll wait, but I'm sure you won't answer.
On the flip side one of my current jobs is doing quite the opposite. A cloud vendor decided to completely depreciate one product in favour of another that we determined didn't suit our needs. We've already received multiple database dumps, and I'm expecting a copy of all reportable data by next week, just as was stipulated in the exit clause of our contract.
Contracts for those of you who've never heard of them are the things that make you stop laughing and realise how stupid you really are, either when you realise companies typically abide by them or when the lawyers actually come knocking on the door.
Now go back to complaining about Google Reader no longer working where you belong little man.
Nobody has been saying that about cloud services since the dawn of IT.
Nope, but people have been saying it about {insert new thing}.
Because I'm one of the cost analysts in my firm I can tell you that 99% reliability means almost 21 hours of down time per year, and that would cost us about 950,000 man hours of productivity (or a little over $47 million in lost labor costs).
Oh, implying that 100% of the time 100% of your work is done in an office application? You're not very good at these estimates.
LOLOLOLOL. Found the gullible millenial.
You're not good at guessing ages either. Maybe you should leave the numbers game to others.
doesn't negate the fact that microsoft has proven time and again that they can not be trusted
Yeah I know right. Just check out the list of partners and corporate clients MS has put out of business:
Yes that was a long list wasn't it.
how about the fact that you more likely to be killed on a commercial airline than you are in a mass shooting
And the amount of effort we put into ensuring every death is investigated and systems are put in place to prevent occurrence on an aircraft should really put it all into perspective.
Oh wait that wasn't the comparison you were looking for was it? Too bad.
Police in parts of the world where guns aren't so readily available are nowhere near as trigger happy.
I saw a documentary one day where they had an American police officer tail a Swedish police officer for a few days. They discussed how each of them approach various situations in the day to day lives. The American couldn't believe that simply removing the gun from the glovebox in the police car would incur an incredible amount of paperwork, regardless if the gun was used.
They did at one point have a hostage situation where the perpetrator did have a gun. The Swedish officer went up and talked to the guy for about 10min after which the victim was let go and kept talking to the guy who was at that point at risk of self harming. Post action interview the American said his default would be to take cover somewhere within range of the situation with his gun drawn.
Was it sensationalised? Probably. The truth is usually somewhere in the middle on these kinds of things, but even the middleground is still a stark contrast to policing in America.
College is un-affordable, school shootings on the rise, we're at 8 wars an counting and AI is going to decimate the job market in the next 20 years... and they pick mobile device addiction to worry about.
Or maybe half of parents pick something they can control to worry about.
Or maybe most people in the world can focus on more than one problem at a time.
Oh I didn't realise that cars were the only thing that cars crash into. Makes sense though. People have never backed into poles, trees, people, the end of their garage or any other stationary object.