How does a satellite stay up if the Earth is really flat?
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za00.htm
The above was written in the late 1800s so does not perform any experiments regarding satellites. It is well worth looking into though; one can see things across the water that should be "below the horizon" -- it is important to note that this observation disproves the current globe theory! (It might be a much larger globe, perhaps, but it is not a 25,000 mile around globe.)
I'd say even if there's nothing there, that she has been behaving exactly like Martha Stewart when she was in a similar situation. Hiding stuff from the investigation, even if "stuff" won't get you nipped, will get you nipped.
See http://www.sacred-texts.com/ea...
Thus, the images that we see in the night sky are most likely on the firmament. We can never get there, just as "A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" (A11 being short for Apollo 11, that is).
Note: the first URL is an image from Jim Stone's site with relevant details. The second link is to his site, which is in numerical form as TPTB are preventing many from getting through to it via DNS hacking.
So are the Chinese really in space? Or are they in a pool, faking the footage?
Why did an astronaut's helmet recently start filling up with water? And why did they announce, on MSM TV, that they were converting half of the tubing inside the suit into snorkels? See this one, of many, articles on the subject: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
Why would an astronaut need a snorkel, in space?
NASA is becoming a laughingstock. The fake footage might have fooled us in the 60s, but these days we have the "Internet hive mind" to look through and discover anomalies, like the square box surrounding the Earth in pictures from the moon, visible when you play with the optical settings in Photoshop -- i.e., it was added, it was not a part of the original picture.
2.3 trillion dollars can buy a lot of Hollywood fakery. That's the amount that Rumsfeld announced was missing the day before a "plane" destroyed the financial section of the Pentagon.
Why have all the governments of the world sealed off Antarctica and space from us? It started in the late 50s when Admiral Byrd found something in Antarctica, and all countries pulled their forces out and signed a "keep out" treaty which isn't negotiable until 2040.
The ISS is in a pool somewhere on Earth, you can tell when you see the bubbles rising from their helmets during a "spacewalk" when they bump something (it's difficult to get all the air bubbles out). It's similar to the pools you see them train in, except this one is done up to look "real". Look for the guy wearing scuba tanks and flippers swimming inside the open hatch. That's not regulation space attire! Also the hairspray so you don't see the women's hair being jerked around by the turbulence (they use the "vomit comet" planes which have been made up to look like the ISS, which is why no part of it is wider than an airplane cabin) -- they got enough feedback that it was ridiculous and she cut her hair short (in zero-G? There must have been hair everywhere!).
The truth is being revealed. Some of us will see it sooner than others. Please, look into it yourself -- "Flat Earth Clues" by Mark Sargent is well-produced, concise, and informative. Then go out and replicate some of the experiments; I've seen a city across the water when it should have been "below the curvature" and I've also tested that moonlight makes things colder, not warmer (the key there is if it's reflected sunlight, then it should still make things warmer -- perhaps not as much as the direct sun does -- but instead, it's warmer in the shadows of the moonlight!).
NASA was founded by Nazis brought over in Operation Paperclip, and the astronauts who "walked on the moon" were all Masons, who take a blood oath (Luciferian) which they say supersedes all other oaths (which makes sense, if they've really sold their souls), and who are members of a secret society meaning they keep secrets among themselves, which means they spread lies outside their group. Don't trust them, or governments. Trust your senses.
Both the US space agency and the Chinese space agency have these troubling issues with their "space" footage: bubbles are seen escaping from the suits! This is evidence that the footage is being taken underwater, rather than in space. In fact, in one of the US space agency's "space walk" videos, a person wearing scuba equipment can be see hiding out in the hatch!
NASA lies. Once you know you're dealing with a liar, everything else they say is suspect.
Recent NASA info says we can't get past the Van Allen belts -- the radiation will fry a person.
So, how did the Apollo 11 astronauts get through? Answer: they didn't.
Stanley Kubrick was hired to fake it. Then he was murdered 3 days after revealing this in an interview (just before "Eyes Wide Shut" came out, which he contractually forced it to come out on the 30th anniversary of Apollo 11).
See the hints in the Shining: "A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy."
Note carefully that the typewriter did not show "All" -- it's "A11", as in "Apollo 11".
I don't trust Masons. They take a blood oath saying all previous and future oaths are subservient to this (Masonic) oath. Every single Apollo astronaut was a Mason.
The definition of "conspiracy" is: two or more people hiding their actions from one or more other people. (Like: surprise party; or, the mafia.)
Thus, if the government "classifies" something, it is a conspiracy by definition! They (one or more people) are hiding their actions from the public (one or more people).
So it's no stretch to say government conspires. Does government classify? Yes. Thus, government conspires.
Thanks, and good luck. (PS There was a run of 5 6's in the comment number of your post; I notice these things, likely some impact of the Asperger's...:)
Nope this is just another case of something the government is damned good at, and that is the appearance of doing SOMETHING even if that something actually is as useless as moving a rock from the left side of a field only to move it back to the right the next day.
Actually that would be good for some exercise. What the FBI is doing here seems like it would be better left not done.
You know, I'm no fun of poor public decision-making but honestly turning off the data in underground public transportation seriously does not seem like that big of a deal to me.
I'm sorry, I just don't see what possible "event" could warrant making the populace unable to communicate with each other, unless said "event" was created by the people who are turning off communications.
Uh, no, it was "way to be challenged on the spot". I really wanted to be on that jury, actually, not because of the issue but because I am interested in learning our civic processes. (I'm also slightly afflicted with Asperger's so do not always function correctly, socially.) And, no, I didn't think, when I was on-the-spot, that the question was related to evidence-less claims, I took the question at face value and attempted to answer it as best I could. Next time I will ask for clarification.
They've always removed me from the jury pool, by asking a question designed to show whether I was intelligent or not. Last time it was, "How believable is a police officer compared to a member of the public?" My response included that the officer had training in observation and recollection, so would likely be a slightly better recording device than a common human, so perhaps 55%, or 60%, instead of 50/50? The judge said, and I quote, "Next."
Reminds me of the test for cops, that kicked applicants out for being too intelligent. "If you can see through our shit, then you're not good enough for us!"
Reading comprehension much? I realize there's only one letter difference, but he wasn't talking about which administration created it; he was talking about the terrorists, and how they're winning. We are now less free than we were last millennium. But still, project your rage.
Slashdot Mirror
How does a satellite stay up if the Earth is really flat?
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za00.htm
The above was written in the late 1800s so does not perform any experiments regarding satellites. It is well worth looking into though; one can see things across the water that should be "below the horizon" -- it is important to note that this observation disproves the current globe theory! (It might be a much larger globe, perhaps, but it is not a 25,000 mile around globe.)
I'd say even if there's nothing there, that she has been behaving exactly like Martha Stewart when she was in a similar situation. Hiding stuff from the investigation, even if "stuff" won't get you nipped, will get you nipped.
The internet model: "we'll lose money on every sale, but we'll make it up in volume!"
See http://www.sacred-texts.com/ea... Thus, the images that we see in the night sky are most likely on the firmament. We can never get there, just as "A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" (A11 being short for Apollo 11, that is).
Why are people with racist names for their organizations seeking racist data?
They made up all that math. The Earth is flat, see "Zetetic Astronomy": http://www.sacred-texts.com/ea...
See http://s8.postimg.org/aft171k7...
Or http://82.221.129.208/aa6index... and search for "DEFINITIVE PROOF: PART PLANTED ON BEACH, NOT FROM FLIGHT 370".
Note: the first URL is an image from Jim Stone's site with relevant details. The second link is to his site, which is in numerical form as TPTB are preventing many from getting through to it via DNS hacking.
So are the Chinese really in space? Or are they in a pool, faking the footage?
Why did an astronaut's helmet recently start filling up with water? And why did they announce, on MSM TV, that they were converting half of the tubing inside the suit into snorkels? See this one, of many, articles on the subject: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
Why would an astronaut need a snorkel, in space?
NASA is becoming a laughingstock. The fake footage might have fooled us in the 60s, but these days we have the "Internet hive mind" to look through and discover anomalies, like the square box surrounding the Earth in pictures from the moon, visible when you play with the optical settings in Photoshop -- i.e., it was added, it was not a part of the original picture.
2.3 trillion dollars can buy a lot of Hollywood fakery. That's the amount that Rumsfeld announced was missing the day before a "plane" destroyed the financial section of the Pentagon.
Why have all the governments of the world sealed off Antarctica and space from us? It started in the late 50s when Admiral Byrd found something in Antarctica, and all countries pulled their forces out and signed a "keep out" treaty which isn't negotiable until 2040.
The ISS is in a pool somewhere on Earth, you can tell when you see the bubbles rising from their helmets during a "spacewalk" when they bump something (it's difficult to get all the air bubbles out). It's similar to the pools you see them train in, except this one is done up to look "real". Look for the guy wearing scuba tanks and flippers swimming inside the open hatch. That's not regulation space attire! Also the hairspray so you don't see the women's hair being jerked around by the turbulence (they use the "vomit comet" planes which have been made up to look like the ISS, which is why no part of it is wider than an airplane cabin) -- they got enough feedback that it was ridiculous and she cut her hair short (in zero-G? There must have been hair everywhere!).
The truth is being revealed. Some of us will see it sooner than others. Please, look into it yourself -- "Flat Earth Clues" by Mark Sargent is well-produced, concise, and informative. Then go out and replicate some of the experiments; I've seen a city across the water when it should have been "below the curvature" and I've also tested that moonlight makes things colder, not warmer (the key there is if it's reflected sunlight, then it should still make things warmer -- perhaps not as much as the direct sun does -- but instead, it's warmer in the shadows of the moonlight!).
NASA was founded by Nazis brought over in Operation Paperclip, and the astronauts who "walked on the moon" were all Masons, who take a blood oath (Luciferian) which they say supersedes all other oaths (which makes sense, if they've really sold their souls), and who are members of a secret society meaning they keep secrets among themselves, which means they spread lies outside their group. Don't trust them, or governments. Trust your senses.
Both the US space agency and the Chinese space agency have these troubling issues with their "space" footage: bubbles are seen escaping from the suits! This is evidence that the footage is being taken underwater, rather than in space. In fact, in one of the US space agency's "space walk" videos, a person wearing scuba equipment can be see hiding out in the hatch!
NASA lies. Once you know you're dealing with a liar, everything else they say is suspect.
Recent NASA info says we can't get past the Van Allen belts -- the radiation will fry a person.
So, how did the Apollo 11 astronauts get through? Answer: they didn't.
Stanley Kubrick was hired to fake it. Then he was murdered 3 days after revealing this in an interview (just before "Eyes Wide Shut" came out, which he contractually forced it to come out on the 30th anniversary of Apollo 11).
See the hints in the Shining: "A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy."
Note carefully that the typewriter did not show "All" -- it's "A11", as in "Apollo 11".
I don't trust Masons. They take a blood oath saying all previous and future oaths are subservient to this (Masonic) oath. Every single Apollo astronaut was a Mason.
Our drills melt at 8 miles. We really don't know what's beneath that, we only speculate on the mantle and the core.
Agree 100%.
The definition of "conspiracy" is: two or more people hiding their actions from one or more other people. (Like: surprise party; or, the mafia.)
Thus, if the government "classifies" something, it is a conspiracy by definition! They (one or more people) are hiding their actions from the public (one or more people).
So it's no stretch to say government conspires. Does government classify? Yes. Thus, government conspires.
How much Slashdot do we need to know in order to be called a geek?
Natalie Portman and grits.
Jon Katz.
You insensitive clod.
In soviet Russia, ...
The eponymous effect.
Libraries of Congress (per second).
Wesley Crusher.
Remembered my login details so that I could say my last goodbye.
Thanks, and good luck. (PS There was a run of 5 6's in the comment number of your post; I notice these things, likely some impact of the Asperger's... :)
Nope this is just another case of something the government is damned good at, and that is the appearance of doing SOMETHING even if that something actually is as useless as moving a rock from the left side of a field only to move it back to the right the next day.
Actually that would be good for some exercise. What the FBI is doing here seems like it would be better left not done.
I'm not sure where the constitution, bill of rights or anything else mentions tweeting. Care to enlighten us?
I believe the first amendment covers that.
You know, I'm no fun of poor public decision-making but honestly turning off the data in underground public transportation seriously does not seem like that big of a deal to me.
I'm sorry, I just don't see what possible "event" could warrant making the populace unable to communicate with each other, unless said "event" was created by the people who are turning off communications.
Way to be purposefully obtuse.
Uh, no, it was "way to be challenged on the spot". I really wanted to be on that jury, actually, not because of the issue but because I am interested in learning our civic processes. (I'm also slightly afflicted with Asperger's so do not always function correctly, socially.) And, no, I didn't think, when I was on-the-spot, that the question was related to evidence-less claims, I took the question at face value and attempted to answer it as best I could. Next time I will ask for clarification.
They've always removed me from the jury pool, by asking a question designed to show whether I was intelligent or not. Last time it was, "How believable is a police officer compared to a member of the public?" My response included that the officer had training in observation and recollection, so would likely be a slightly better recording device than a common human, so perhaps 55%, or 60%, instead of 50/50? The judge said, and I quote, "Next."
Exactly! Just like he threatened a veto on NDAA, and said he would close Gitmo.
Reminds me of the test for cops, that kicked applicants out for being too intelligent. "If you can see through our shit, then you're not good enough for us!"
Travel is not a right.
Perhaps not directly; however: how am I to pursue this happiness when I keep running into security checkpoints?
Reading comprehension much? I realize there's only one letter difference, but he wasn't talking about which administration created it; he was talking about the terrorists, and how they're winning. We are now less free than we were last millennium. But still, project your rage.