Slashdot Mirror


User: Thing+1

Thing+1's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,374
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,374

  1. Re:Brilliant coders can be terrible writers on Does Typing Speed Really Matter For Programmers? · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. Not all coders understand that they are communicating to two (perhaps more) completely separate audiences.

  2. Re:Of course it does on Does Typing Speed Really Matter For Programmers? · · Score: 1

    But, despite the bleeting of those damned grammer nazis, those typos back there hardly change the meaning of the sentence in any meaningful way, anybody with half a mind knows what I just said.

    Yes, and despite the bleating of the compiler warnings, the typos in your code will lead to correctly functioning programs. I'm sorry, but quality is quality.

  3. Re:Not really important if somewhat proficient on Does Typing Speed Really Matter For Programmers? · · Score: 1

    Start believing in a higher power?

  4. Re:There's also a "technical" reason on Google Pushes Openness Over Rooting · · Score: 1

    All BMWs are cars, but not all cars are BMWs.

  5. Re:Destroying the US economy? on Crookes, RIAA, MPAA, ICE — 'Linking Is Publishing' · · Score: 1

    Amusing that a movie about pirates would be the most pirated, and also the highest grossing. Way to spread the message, MPAA! :)

  6. Re:Yawn on Android Phones At the Edge of Space · · Score: 1

    SNL? I thought The Muppet Show did it first ("Piiiiiigs iiiiiin Spaaaace!")

  7. Re:Interesting story behind MegaUpload on MegaUpload Dares RIAA To Sue Them · · Score: 1

    it's getting just as tired and cliched as most porn movies; still, it will get milked as long as people keep buying it.

    Thank you for that disturbing mental image. :)

  8. Re:TSA = Drag on the economy on TSA Investigates Pilot Who Exposed Security Flaws · · Score: 1

    Pictures anywhere? Name of business? I really want to see this before it hits its head on a bullet.

  9. Re:How much more ridiculous does this have to get on CIA Launches WTF To Investigate Wikileaks · · Score: 1

    and we're trying to win a war

    LOL that's really funny, or would be if it wasn't also so sad. There's no "war" there is just conquest of resources by a foreign aggressor, with a little propaganda to make it look like they weren't the aggressor.

  10. Re:Led by the CIA Universal Network Team on CIA Launches WTF To Investigate Wikileaks · · Score: 1

    Now I understand why posters so often the verb: overzealous ^Wing.

  11. Re:Homeopathic Medicine on Placebos Work -- Even Without Deception · · Score: 1

    Yes, of course dogs can sense the attitudes of their owners, and owners will subconsciously give their dogs extra encouragement when they expect them to get better (which is why real medical studies are double-blind wherever possible).

    But how can you do a double-blind experiment on a domesticated canine? If it has bonded with the owner, depriving it of the owner might lead to depressive symptoms...

  12. Re:Everyone does it on Bank of America Buying Abusive Domain Names · · Score: 2

    Agreed: tagged "wastingmoremoney"

  13. Re:Yeah i was thinking about that. on Electric Cars May Be Made Noisier By Law · · Score: 1

    Either it would be the brown noise, or it would piss off dogs...

  14. Re:Yeah i was thinking about that. on Electric Cars May Be Made Noisier By Law · · Score: 1

    Wanna bet they'll continue to be allowed to drive silent vehicles, and we won't be able to?

  15. Re:Rule of Law on Recording the Police · · Score: 1

    The private establishment was not privately linked to the place you will sleep it off, is what I meant. But then, I tend towards ambiguity. :)

  16. Re:It's all downhill from here on The 57 Lamest Tech Moments of 2010 · · Score: 1

    Like being raided by the FBI, or DHS, or KGB, or whatever?

  17. Re:Welcome to the end of the year... on The 57 Lamest Tech Moments of 2010 · · Score: 1

    So leaving the verb out of acronyms is now in style as well? Damn my lawn is getting bigger...

  18. Re:For sure on Recording the Police · · Score: 1

    The police are to be monitored 24/7.

  19. Re:I agree in general, but I do understand on Recording the Police · · Score: 1

    I mean how would you feel if at work your employer wanted to watch you all the time?

    Seriously? I would welcome it. I don't waste any time at work on Facebook, Slashdot, or other non-work-related activities. Yes, I field calls from businesses which I must deal with which are only open during business hours which my employer agrees with (accountant, attorney, banks, etc). But I make them quick and to the point. I would welcome my employer watching me 8/5 (i.e., business hours, not 24/7). I would certainly welcome the comparison between my productivity and that of the drooling, but politically competent, morons.

  20. Re:There is no expectation of privacy on Recording the Police · · Score: 1

    You are my hero. I've only so far rejected my asshole brother.

  21. Re:Rule of Law on Recording the Police · · Score: -1, Troll

    Stop drinking in public.

  22. Re:Rule of Law on Recording the Police · · Score: 1

    I think the rule should be that ALL laws are applied in order of their severity at all times.

    I think your thinking will lead to Skynet. Seriously: we will need machines to monitor all human interactions (and solitary interactions, I mean, in some places masturbation is a crime), and those machines will not ever give any leeway. That combined with the understanding that we all commit, according to the book, "Three Felonies a Day" and we will all be ground up into unvoting citizens in short order. The machines will win, and the only solace we have is that they will take our meatbag overlords with us.

  23. Re:Rule of Law on Recording the Police · · Score: 1

    I recently read "Three Felonies a Day" and agree with your assessment.

  24. Re:Not on wikileaks? on Assange Secret Swedish Police Report Leaked · · Score: 1

    You seem to be devolving the later it got last night.

  25. Re:Not on wikileaks? on Assange Secret Swedish Police Report Leaked · · Score: 1

    And civilians are always protected - and if someone is not clearly a combatant (i.e. either they wear uniform, or carry guns, or perform a hostile action towards you), then they are to be considered civilians.

    I am reminded of a short-lived series, "Over There", about our foreign war (I think it was Afghanistan, but it may have been after we attacked Iraq without provocation). There was an episode where a local had a house which had a bunch of money hidden in the walls, and the Americans infiltrated and took the money. The owner came home, and started shooting at the thieves, only the thieves had much bigger weapons than the owner and killed him. That was the turning point for me.