I'd say that those senators who support "free speech zones" are clearly enemies of the constitution.
I support a free speech zone - it's called the United States.
I support a rather larger one.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
(Notice that the Wikipedia article on anarcho-syndicalism says "Part of a series on Libertarian socialism").
Political philosophies commonly described as libertarian socialist include most varieties of anarchism (especially anarchist communism, anarchist collectivism, anarcho-syndicalism, and mutualism) as well as autonomism, Communalism, participism, libertarian Marxist philosophies such as council communism and Luxemburgism(*), and some versions of "utopian socialism" and individualist anarchism.
(* After Rosa Luxemburg and not the smug little Duchy)
Our client base is primarily in West Vancouver BC - the richest municipality in Canada. The kind of town where a $3 million house is a "starter", and will immediately be pulled own to build a 20,000 ft McMansion.
In many years of working with clients in WV, I can recall TWO that actually ever turned on their alarms, and would estimate that half of our clients don't even lock their doors.
If nothing else they demonstrate that Vancouver's criminal class is either really dumb, or can't afford a bus pass.
Or maybe the clients have blown all their money on the McMansion and there is nothing inside worth stealing?
Your problem comes from your rather limited definition of "Socialism".
Libertarian Socialism existed long before the current American misunderstanding of "Libertarianism", which is closer to what the rest of the world calls "Liberalism".
I've actually moved quite a bit from the left to the center over the years.
And if asked, I say I'm a Libertarian Socialist. Keeps the scratching their heads for a moment while I run away from another useless political argument.
I don't undestand. What's so strange about being a Libertarian Socialist? It's a perfectly understandable position, and a lot closer to the original sense of "libertarian" than the normal American usage, which is what most people in the world describe as "liberal".
N14 is 7 protons + 7 neutrons. Add a neutron to that and you've got N15 (7 protons + 8 neutrons).
To get to C14 from N14 you've got to turn a proton to a neutron. (Carbon has 6 protons. C13 has 6 protons and 7 neutrons, C14 has 6 protons and 8 neutrons).
Roughly speaking proton + electron <-> neutron, so
N14 + beta <-> C14
Obviously you could get from C13 to C14 by neutron capture, but that's not what we're talking about here.
You know, I asked the very same thing years ago, and was told that because I had more, I should feel proud to give to those who have less. Funny how these noble sentiments go out the window as soon as the "wrong" politics get involved, eh?
The problem with republicans claiming to be against redistribution while benefiting from it isn't that redistribution is wrong, it's that the hypocrisy is irritating.
A lot of things should be hated and a lot of things should be loved. One of the purposes of free speech is to determine which is which. If "incitement to hatred" is the problem, would I be prosecuted for inciting hatred of the death camps?
Incitement to hatred of people.
Anyway, don't bother arguing with me about it. It's the citizens of Germany who decide what is and what is not allowed in Germany, not some random internet loser.
Uh, censorship wasn't exactly the worst thing the Nazis did, and they don't get censored because of the bad things they did, but because their "speach" consists of incitement to hatred.
Slashdot Mirror
At the very least, blanket metadata capture means the answer is absolutely, positively, unrepentantly YES.
You think he doesn't know that?
Or maybe he's setting them up for a fall when they answer "no"?
McCarthy was, on the whole, quite right about the existence of the problem of communist infiltration of american institutions.
Yeah, look at that Bernie Sanders guy - he even admits to being a Socialist!
I'd say that those senators who support "free speech zones" are clearly enemies of the constitution.
I support a free speech zone - it's called the United States.
I support a rather larger one.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
I mean if they are "exempt" from being spied on it seems logical the "terrorists" would become members of congress and avoid being spied on.
So you watched Homeland too?
For example a corrupted or coerced judge could easily keep a serious terrorist from being convicted.
You're living in fantasy land.
To a first approximation there are no terrorists.
A corrupt judge that the NSA has the drop on could be used to convict anyone they want to convict.
What, no love for the USPS?
Are you not up to date?
The USPS is spying on you.
They photograph and archive the metadata (i.e. envelope info) of every single piece of mail.
Intersecting sets.
(Notice that the Wikipedia article on anarcho-syndicalism says "Part of a series on Libertarian socialism").
Political philosophies commonly described as libertarian socialist include most varieties of anarchism (especially anarchist communism, anarchist collectivism, anarcho-syndicalism, and mutualism) as well as autonomism, Communalism, participism, libertarian Marxist philosophies such as council communism and Luxemburgism(*), and some versions of "utopian socialism" and individualist anarchism.
(* After Rosa Luxemburg and not the smug little Duchy)
Our client base is primarily in West Vancouver BC - the richest municipality in Canada. The kind of town where a $3 million house is a "starter", and will immediately be pulled own to build a 20,000 ft McMansion.
In many years of working with clients in WV, I can recall TWO that actually ever turned on their alarms, and would estimate that half of our clients don't even lock their doors.
If nothing else they demonstrate that Vancouver's criminal class is either really dumb, or can't afford a bus pass.
Or maybe the clients have blown all their money on the McMansion and there is nothing inside worth stealing?
Your problem comes from your rather limited definition of "Socialism".
Libertarian Socialism existed long before the current American misunderstanding of "Libertarianism", which is closer to what the rest of the world calls "Liberalism".
It is the patents like what Monsanto is doing that are the problem. There is no health issues.
There is no grammar either.
Correct. It's not about safety. It's about giving customers what they want,
So far so good...
which is the result of scientifically illiterate scare tactics by talking heads making a career of it.
And then you blow it, demonstrating that you don't know how capitalism is supposed to work.
or finding continuity errors in star wars novels.
Novels?
What about the continuity errors in the Star Wars films!
It make me strangely happy to realize that there is a Klingon Language Institute.
Yes, it means that Klingon is like French, a language defined by a committee.
I've actually moved quite a bit from the left to the center over the years.
And if asked, I say I'm a Libertarian Socialist. Keeps the scratching their heads for a moment while I run away from another useless political argument.
I don't undestand. What's so strange about being a Libertarian Socialist? It's a perfectly understandable position, and a lot closer to the original sense of "libertarian" than the normal American usage, which is what most people in the world describe as "liberal".
comment to undo bad mod. fucking slashcrap.
N14 is 7 protons + 7 neutrons. Add a neutron to that and you've got N15 (7 protons + 8 neutrons).
To get to C14 from N14 you've got to turn a proton to a neutron. (Carbon has 6 protons. C13 has 6 protons and 7 neutrons, C14 has 6 protons and 8 neutrons).
Roughly speaking proton + electron <-> neutron, so
N14 + beta <-> C14
Obviously you could get from C13 to C14 by neutron capture, but that's not what we're talking about here.
or am I dumb?
So, how do you turn N14 into C14? With a hammer?
Uh, you do know that C14 decays to N14 by emitting a beta particle don't you?
I'm not too hot on mass wealth redistribution though, only that there's a base floor provided for everyone.
Congratulations, you're a socialist.
You know, I asked the very same thing years ago, and was told that because I had more, I should feel proud to give to those who have less. Funny how these noble sentiments go out the window as soon as the "wrong" politics get involved, eh?
The problem with republicans claiming to be against redistribution while benefiting from it isn't that redistribution is wrong, it's that the hypocrisy is irritating.
Ah, the US government gave itself a get out of jail free card.
Shock and awe!
Can I arrest [ Republican Party here in the U.S.] and still pretend to give a fuck about free speech, like you Germans?
Why do you bother asking stupid questions you already know the answer to?
Are the US Republican party promulgating Nazi ideology in Germany?
Why do you pretend to give a fuck about free speach when the only thing you can use that freedom for is to be an idiot on the internet?
A lot of things should be hated and a lot of things should be loved. One of the purposes of free speech is to determine which is which. If "incitement to hatred" is the problem, would I be prosecuted for inciting hatred of the death camps?
Incitement to hatred of people.
Anyway, don't bother arguing with me about it. It's the citizens of Germany who decide what is and what is not allowed in Germany, not some random internet loser.
Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and adherents of other religions do not go on killing rampages.
What fucking planet are you living on?
Uh, censorship wasn't exactly the worst thing the Nazis did, and they don't get censored because of the bad things they did, but because their "speach" consists of incitement to hatred.