It's never as simple as "Just grow some bugs and chow down". Most species of insects are hosts to assorted parasites. For instance, the common grasshopper (yummy when fried) can carry tapeworms.
While we have lots of experience dealing with parasites of domestic mammals, not so much for bugs that live on other bugs.
Huge future assets aren't worth much if you're going broke now.
Conservation is important but there really aren't those kinds of big savings to be had. People don't want to drive golf carts to work and they don't want to live in the city. And I can't blame them. And 70F? Try 77 and it's still expensive.
And yes, boondoggles. Even in Germany. Read the "Government Policy" section of that wiki article. They are paying huge subsidies for renewable energy.
What are the long-term costs of not exploiting domestic energy supplies? More funding for our dear friends the Saudis? Escalating death-spiral of energy prices while renewables turn out to be expensive boondoggles? Our Dear Leader did promise that energy prices would necessarily skyrocket, and that's one promise he seems determined to fulfill.
Fracking wells themselves are too deep for that to matter very much, also the pressure of fracking is momentary, much more like blasting in a mine. The problem you describe is more likely to be caused by a brine-injection well, which is done at shallower depths and is intended for long-term storage of the injected brine at pressure. I know, we've had several small earthquakes here in NE Ohio resulting from improperly operated brine injection wells.
You'd likely find an "Emergency Powers" clause which allow the President (or whatever he's called) to rule by decree. It only takes one clause like that to make a complete mockery of the rest of the constitution.
That is just utterly ridiculous. Getting out of the car makes no difference to the right to self defense. Even "confrontation" makes no difference. The only thing that would negate the self-defense plea is if Zimmerman actually physically attacked Martin and then progressed from fighting to shooting. And there is absolutely no evidence nor testimony that he did so.
It would be ever so refreshing if people made the slightest effort to understand the law before they started blathering about it. I know, too much to ask.
"Except Martin's DNA was not on the holster or the gun." That was covered in the trial. Even under ideal conditions DNA doesn't stick 100% of the time, and it was raining.
"Stand your ground" has nothing to do with this case. It's a pure case of self-defense.
"Within three generations we could weed virtually all aggressive genes out of the gene pool." And within four generations the few aggressive ones left would rule the rest with an iron fist.
Slashdot Mirror
But those are exactly the arguments why voter id is racist. Just ask the Justice Department.
ID may be required for everything except voting - for that it's racist.
Some assembly required.
...or that will undo all the cognitive gains you get from playing.
"Bodily fluids obtained during sex" =/= "sex".
I'd say that drug law enforcement has long since crossed the line into Orwellian. And it's leaking into other areas of law enforcement as well.
It's never as simple as "Just grow some bugs and chow down". Most species of insects are hosts to assorted parasites.
For instance, the common grasshopper (yummy when fried) can carry tapeworms.
While we have lots of experience dealing with parasites of domestic mammals, not so much for bugs that live on other bugs.
Sounds like a stealthy way of killing off the project, by piling on requirements until it's obviously too expensive or risky.
It would cost the same delta-v to rendezvous with an asteroid as it would to reach the same orbit without the rendezvous.
Huge future assets aren't worth much if you're going broke now.
Conservation is important but there really aren't those kinds of big savings to be had. People don't want to drive golf carts to work and they don't want to live in the city. And I can't blame them. And 70F? Try 77 and it's still expensive.
And yes, boondoggles. Even in Germany. Read the "Government Policy" section of that wiki article. They are paying huge subsidies for renewable energy.
Don't just tell us, call the advertisers of The View and tell them.
Right up there with frying food or scented candles. We'll get back to you on that, sure.
What are the long-term costs of not exploiting domestic energy supplies? More funding for our dear friends the Saudis? Escalating death-spiral of energy prices while renewables turn out to be expensive boondoggles? Our Dear Leader did promise that energy prices would necessarily skyrocket, and that's one promise he seems determined to fulfill.
Fracking wells themselves are too deep for that to matter very much, also the pressure of fracking is momentary, much more like blasting in a mine. The problem you describe is more likely to be caused by a brine-injection well, which is done at shallower depths and is intended for long-term storage of the injected brine at pressure. I know, we've had several small earthquakes here in NE Ohio resulting from improperly operated brine injection wells.
Nothing changed. That area has had methane in the ground water since long before fracking ever happened.
Bank Error In Your Favor means you Go Directly To Jail if you try to spend the money.
I tried not believing in gravity, but it only made me lightheaded.
You'd likely find an "Emergency Powers" clause which allow the President (or whatever he's called) to rule by decree. It only takes one clause like that to make a complete mockery of the rest of the constitution.
Sorry but that fantasy of yours is not supported by either evidence or testimony. Stick to the facts as known.
Your ability to conjure up fantasies has nothing to do with the witnesses and the evidence in the trial.
When "confront his pursuer" means "knock him down and beat his head against the sidewalk" then I think there's possibly a minor flaw in your argument.
That is just utterly ridiculous. Getting out of the car makes no difference to the right to self defense.
Even "confrontation" makes no difference. The only thing that would negate the self-defense plea is if Zimmerman actually physically attacked Martin and then progressed from fighting to shooting.
And there is absolutely no evidence nor testimony that he did so.
It would be ever so refreshing if people made the slightest effort to understand the law before they started blathering about it.
I know, too much to ask.
Indeed, we have testimony that Martin was almost home when he decided to go back and attack Zimmerman.
"Except Martin's DNA was not on the holster or the gun."
That was covered in the trial. Even under ideal conditions DNA doesn't stick 100% of the time, and it was raining.
"Stand your ground" has nothing to do with this case. It's a pure case of self-defense.
"Within three generations we could weed virtually all aggressive genes out of the gene pool."
And within four generations the few aggressive ones left would rule the rest with an iron fist.