Slashdot Mirror


What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects?

Lasrick writes "Scientific American has a really nice article explaining why insects should be considered a good food source, and how the encroachment of Western attitudes into societies that traditionally eat insects is affecting consumption of this important source of nutrients. Good stuff." Especially when they're so easy to grow.

655 comments

  1. Good Question by MikeDataLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's all in our heads. We choose to eat some animals (like cows) and not others (like cats) because of cultural reasons. Same with insects.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    1. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Funny

      We choose to eat some animals (like cows) and not others (like cats)...

      Speak for yourself; I find cat makes a fine goulash. Okay, well I might if I lived in Lousiana... :)

    2. Re:Good Question by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Funny

      in many places in the world, they walk their dog. in some places in asia, they wok their dog.

    3. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to a market in rural China sometime. Those people will eat about anything (and I'm not even joking).

    4. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That, and cat is stringy and greasy. It's not really "good" in anything, no matter how you prepare it.

      Beef, on the other hand, is heavenly if prepared correctly.

      Alligator and snake are two typically taboo meats in the States (though admittedly less so than cat) that can be awesome when cooked properly, if you're looking for examples.

    5. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, its the taste stupid

    6. Re:Good Question by firex726 · · Score: 1

      I eat insects occasionally and at first it does take a bit of willpower to get past the grossness of it.

      If you grind them up like meal worms in flower then it's much easier.

    7. Re:Good Question by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Informative

      in many places in the world, they walk their dog. in some places in asia, they wok their dog.

      It is believed among the first domesticated animal, raised for consumption were dogs.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Good Question by DougOtto · · Score: 4, Funny

      I love cats. I just can't eat a whole one myself.

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    9. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great treat, fresh snake blood. Bring snake to table, cut off head, hold up snake and let blood drain into mouth.

    10. Re:Good Question by unique_parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think eating non-vegitarian animals is not a very clever idea.

    11. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't think 'gator is "taboo" so much as "novel". It's common either in burger or fried form at Florida tourist traps.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Good Question by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      Are you 12? You're mother should teach you some manners.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    13. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They served as a dual purpose... dogs actually were a result of wolves domesticating themselves. The socialable wolves were not killed by humans as they hung out eating their scraps. The new dogs served as companions and were used as "reserve" food supply. Humans used to eat wild horses regularly, and later used them as a beast of burden AND a "reserve" food supply.

      Once you start having a relationship with something, you tend to want to avoid eating it, because you cannot undo it. So, you keep looking for another food source. Eventually, it becomes taboo.

    14. Re:Good Question by gewalker · · Score: 2

      They probably won't eat cheese -- the Chinese are generally not fond of consuming spoiled milk.

    15. Re:Good Question by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      Carnivore flesh is not that tasty. Notice we really don't eat carnivores.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    16. Re:Good Question by bonehead · · Score: 1

      It's common either in burger or fried form at Florida tourist traps.

      Hell, it's not exactly hard to find up in Iowa and Illinois. Not cheap, but not hard to find. Off the top of my head I can name half a dozen grocery stores that carry it, and 2 or 3 bars that serve it.

    17. Re:Good Question by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Spoiling the milk gets rid of all of the lactose that will give those Chinese the biggest bellyache and case of the runs they've ever had.

      That is why humans consume a wide variety of fermented milk products (not just cheese).

      Fermentation is not bad and it's not just limited to dairy.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re:Good Question by Holi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I dunno, fish is healthy, and most fish we eat is not vegetarian.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    19. Re:Good Question by fredrated · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard there is a saying "in xx province they eat anything with 4 legs except a table"

    20. Re:Good Question by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for "taboo" you'd probably be more correct mentioning something like horses. Horse meat is very good (or so I hear) but because of the culture of horses as pets/companions rather than livestock, most Americans would shy away from eating it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    21. Re:Good Question by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't cook any of my cats, but from the descriptions it seems like cat might be ok in a stew or soup. I have seen a few stories of cat consumption which tend to agree with this thought. In fact, most of the wikipedia headings on it seem to indicate stew is a common choice for those who eat cat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_meat

      Overall though, I think this is part of why cats self-domesticated:

      1. We don't eat the same things they do... vermin tend to not be worth our time. They are not terribly good meat themselves, and also not really worth our time.
      2. They are not tasty nor worth our time in terms of meat:carcass ratio
      3. They don't eat the same things we do... they can't taste sugar and their need for lysine makes them obligate carnivores,
      4. They eat vermin who do eat the same things we do. Cats don't eat grain, but mice and rats do.
      5. They can't harm us beyond a scratch or a bite, which can mean infection and even loss of limb or death, but that isn't really the same issue; a cat in such a fight with a human is most likely going to lose badly and quickly.

      Throw in cuddly and warm, and its easy to see why cats and humans made natural, mutually beneficial, community, and why we let them move indoors with us.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    22. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      What's the matter, don't like a little uric acid in your stew? :p

    23. Re:Good Question by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

      no, you made up that last bit about "taboo" yourselves. Dogs on the menu at many places in the word, so are horses (FDA just added Mr. Ed to list by the way, my glue-eating classmates of 40+ years ago were clearly ahead of their time)

    24. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Carnivore flesh is not that tasty. Notice we really don't eat carnivores.

      I don't know, I like salmon, and it's pretty widely eaten throughout the world. I always thought it had something to do with carnivores taking more work to raise cause then you're farming food(grain) for the food(mice maybe) to raise your food(carnivore). If we eat the herbivores then we cut out a whole level of farming. And snake and alligator both taste like chicken anyway.

    25. Re: Good Question by IrquiM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Horse is not a reserve food. One of the best steaks I have ever had was horse meat.

      --
      This is blinging
    26. Re: Good Question by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      You can even come across it in Norway.

      --
      This is blinging
    27. Re:Good Question by ozydingo · · Score: 2

      Is that because they're not tasty or because they're not easy to farm? Some folks will say that dog tastes amazing, though I've never tried it myself.

    28. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Western civilization, it is taboo to eat dog. Whether you know someone that eats dog or not is irrelevant.

    29. Re:Good Question by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I think fermentation is awesome.

    30. Re:Good Question by jkflying · · Score: 1

      "Anything with legs except a table, anything with fins except a submarine, anything with wings except an airplane."

      That's what my grandfather said he heard when he visited China in the 80s.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    31. Re:Good Question by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Apparently if you beat them to death the meat is an aphrodisiac. They had to outlaw eating dogs in Mauritius because of Chinese immigrants...

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    32. Re:Good Question by cusco · · Score: 5, Informative

      When the Inca conquered a new people they left the religion and social structure more or less in place, but implemented a few new laws that superseded the existing laws.

      1) The Sun is the god of all gods, superior to whatever deities you already have
      2) The Inca is the king of all kings, superior to whatever ruler you already have
      3) No more sodomy (they wanted to increase population as quickly as possible
      4) Stop eating dogs

      We have three 'calatos', the Peruvian hairless dog (my wife's family has had one or more of these dogs continuously for at least 40 years). Wonderful animals, clean, loyal, no shedding, no fleas, affectionate, intelligent, pretty much everything you want in a dog. And since there's no hair they're easy to prepare for the oven.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    33. Re:Good Question by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Funny

      I eat insects occasionally and at first it does take a bit of willpower to get past the grossness of it.

      If you grind them up like meal worms in flower then it's much easier.

      1. I'm sure the ruling class are going to dive head first into this trend. But they sure will appreciate the momentary dip in meat prices when foodstamps are only valid for insects. After all it is the economical thing to do.
      2. I can say one thing for certain... there aren't enough poor assholes on this planet to be exploited. Hopefully, these new food sources allow us to expand the population... especially in poor regions.
      3. My ethics tell me... eat the rich first. The insects are a backup plan.

    34. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just bought 600 grams of horse sirloin ("ulkofile" in Finnish, I assume it's a sirloin on a horse as well as a cow, never butchered either, tbh) today.

      It's great meat.

    35. Re:Good Question by xevioso · · Score: 1

      No, that's why you marinate skate, for example, in lemon juice before cooking it...it neutralizes the uric acid.

    36. Re:Good Question by cusco · · Score: 1

      Beef? The blandest of meats? If you want good meat try mountain-raised sheep, buffalo, alpaca or guinea pig. Beef is acceptable if you spice it properly, but we rarely bother to buy it.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    37. Re:Good Question by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Dragonflies and butterflies have wings...I am not aware if eating insects is common amongst Chinese folks.

    38. Re:Good Question by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Alligator and snake are two typically taboo meats in the States

      Some States, perhaps. Louisiana, not so much. Ditto Florida.

      Note that you can buy farm-raised gator meat in Florida, if the idea of wild-gator meat bothers you.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    39. Re:Good Question by cusco · · Score: 3, Informative

      In most of the world horses are working animals. They're taboo because no one wants to eat their tractor/pickup/thresher, and by the time the horse dies they're so tough that shoe leather is preferable.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    40. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all swallow 2 or 3 spiders a year, in our sleep.

    41. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just needs to be marketed properly is all. Sell it as a delicious product with a limited time availability and I'm sure you'll have people lining out the door for it! Use a name that hints at meat but doesn't outright claim the product is made from meat.

      Nobody would eat a McThorax, but call it a McRib and now you have a winner!

    42. Re:Good Question by xevioso · · Score: 2

      Cats know better than to "fight" humans in the way you describe. When I get in a fight with my cat , it's because I forgot to feed him some morning or neglected to clean out the litter box over time; he responds with a left hook by leaving a big steaming pile of something in the shower as a present.

    43. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they find themselves in an Ikea.

    44. Re:Good Question by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      The one time I ate horse, it was awful. Although to be fair, it was a really old horse farm work horse that was put down due to age. I wouldn't mind trying horse again, but I would want one that was slaughtered more in it's prime. My rule of thumb is I will try just about anything that is considered food by some culture on the planet, and isn't likely to kill me.

    45. Re:Good Question by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I actually have an aunt from Manila in the Philippines who asked me if I knew why her dog was called a chow. I said I didn't know and she respond with, "because when you catch one that's what time it is."

      My family is primarily descended from the UK so she's normally the odd one out at family reunions. She's easily one of the best Asian cooks I know, but she likes to comment that her dog ran away after supper's over. She's done it for as long as I can remember.

    46. Re:Good Question by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2

      And before investing time effort and funding into insect based food sources I would think making that investment into alternative plant based foods, like quinoa for protein and purslane for omega-3s, would make sense.

    47. Re:Good Question by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      It's all in our heads

      Yes. my tongue is in my head, and I don't know if it's millions of years of evolution tweaking my taste buds to associate the taste of insects with 'spoiled food' (ie: Go eat the food that doesn't have an insect infestation).

      But with insects, I hate the texture. You really can't argue for the flavor of insects when most recipes go like this:

      1. Take insects
      2. Cover them in a strong flavor seasoning (chile powder, honey, tomato sauces, etc)
      3. Fry

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    48. Re:Good Question by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      pretty much everything you want in a dog

      If you don't mind your dog being fugly...

    49. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a reserve food when it is your ride home and you would prefer not to carry yourself and/or your stuff.

    50. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in the US it is _illegal_ LOL... we are so weird. Naturally, we are still allowed to sell them for slaughter. Because, you know, it doesn't matter that the horse is eaten, just that it cannot be eaten HERE.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    51. Re:Good Question by smillie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some of us have been eating insects for as long as we have owned motorcycles.

      --

      Dyslexics Untie!

    52. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we don't.

      http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/spiders.asp

      Spiders are far too much scared by us gigantic (from their perspective) non-edible death threats.

    53. Re:Good Question by erroneus · · Score: 1

      No. If bugs were delicious, we would eat them. Plain and simple. The ones people experimentally or as a novelty are usually covered in chocolate or something else which will mask the taste and/or texture.

      Bugs, in large numbers, might fill a belly, but there is also a lot of other stuff (ike their exoskeleton) just doesn't do anything for taste even if it might supply us with some useful body building material. It might be useful to recognize that crabs are not all that different from insects in many ways. We don't usually eat their shells (exoskeletons) so why we would want to eat bug shells escapes me.

      To make use of insects, we would have to ground and process them into some sort of paste and somehow reduce undesirable matter within.

    54. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually no longer true. Several horse slaughtering plants are expect to come online soon.

    55. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know this how? Now who's stupid?

    56. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Parent may have been clueless to the tongue-in-cheek nature of my post but whoever modded this down was nonetheless a fucking moron; it's well understood that the flesh of nearly-completely-carnivorous creatures (such as felines) is highly toxic and can kill you if you eat it.

    57. Re:Good Question by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      It's all in our heads. We choose to eat some animals (like cows) and not others (like cats) because of cultural reasons. Same with insects.

      That is true, however, the average human still accidentally ingests an estimated 0,5-1 kilogram of insect parts every year. A 100gr serving of peanut butter contains around 30 insect parts. Yummy....

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    58. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you realize that nothing you said contradicted the person you said was wrong.

    59. Re:Good Question by cusco · · Score: 1

      Well, Fluffy is admittedly pretty homely, but Hairy is really cute and Chenchilitos (their mom) looks like a little black whippet until they you get close enough to see that it's her skin that's black not fur. Wish SlashDot allowed photo uploads, although that opens the door to goatse-guy.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    60. Re:Good Question by lxs · · Score: 1

      So what do they taste like?

    61. Re:Good Question by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      We all swallow 2 or 3 spiders a year, in our sleep.

      That's not true. The real number is much higher.

      http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2011-05-09/37902.jpg

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    62. Re:Good Question by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      Commenting to undo accidental modding...

    63. Re:Good Question by lxs · · Score: 1

      Flying Gambas
      Air Prawns
      Sky Lobsters
      Six legged Turkeys

    64. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biggest fear is that the insects are prepared in a way that is not safe for me because my gut flora has never encountered whatever could be on them.

    65. Re:Good Question by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I heard there is a saying "in xx province they eat anything with 4 legs except a table"

      xx=Guangdong. The first time I went to a restaurant in Guangzhou (capitol and largest city in Guangdong Province) I was amazed. There were rows of cages full of dogs, cats, snakes, turtles, frogs, etc. There was even a live peacock. You just pick the animal you want to eat, and they will kill it right in front of you so there is no question about the freshness. I ordered the tofu.

    66. Re:Good Question by lxs · · Score: 1

      Don't eat quinoa. Seriously don't.

    67. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horse is one of the few meats that gets sweeter as the animal ages.... so no dice

    68. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      We've slaughtered them before, but always export the meat. It is illegal to sell in the US, which makes us raving silly hypocrites.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    69. Re:Good Question by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      in many places in the world, they walk their dog. in some places in Asia, they wok their dog.

      For those on a Palaeolithic diet, that would be "wok the dinosaur".
      [ Note: "walk the dinosaur" is something completely different ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    70. Re: Good Question by nebular · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Horse is a reserve food. Taste is secondary to usefulness. A horse can do a large amount of work, they are more useful on the yoke than on the table. Same with dog. Dogs are more useful as a work animal than a food animal. Cows, not so much. I can't think of too many situations where a cow would be best suited as a work animal. So we eat cows, same with most kinds of pig. Over time the cost benefit gets melded with some of the cultures and you get a social taboo.

    71. Re:Good Question by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Beef? The blandest of meats? If you want good meat try mountain-raised sheep, buffalo, alpaca or guinea pig. Beef is acceptable if you spice it properly, but we rarely bother to buy it.

      Do you really get much out of guinea pig? Most beef sold in the US is very bland, but it's because of all the factory farming, loading them with antibiotics, keeping them confined to small areas, and stuffing them full of corn. Even most of the stuff sold as "grass-fed beef" really just means they got to graze for a while, but they still get sold to a producer that fattens them up on cheap grain and corn.

      Look for a local farmer that actually finishes the cows on pasture grass, and without accoutrements or steroids. When I get a good cut of that stuff, I just pass it over the coals and put it on the plate. Delicious.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    72. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to start wearing a helmet with a shield.

    73. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't find it amazing. It tastes like dog piss.

    74. Re:Good Question by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      3. My ethics tell me... eat the rich first. The insects are a backup plan.

      Blah. Too much fat and not enough lean in your first choice, unless you mean organic, grass-fed, free-range rich, but there's not many of them around and the price per pound is outrageous.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    75. Re:Good Question by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Dragonflies and butterflies have wings...I am not aware if eating insects is common amongst Chinese folks.

      It depends where you are in China. In some southern provinces, people eat grubs. I once visited Lanzhou in the western province of Gansu, and was served fried grasshoppers. Bug cuisine is rare in the big eastern cities, but you can find them in Beijing if you go to the night market at Wangfujing. There are ethnic food vendors from all over China, and some of them serve bugs.

    76. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soy killer!!!!! Murderer of innocent beans! Those legumes had family, you know!

    77. Re:Good Question by rullywowr · · Score: 1

      I think fermentation is awesome.

      I'll drink to that!

    78. Re:Good Question by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      But wounded horses, especially those that where unlucky to break a leg (not easy to heal properly), end up on the table. And yes, horse meat often taste very good - more taste than beef, usually tender, and much cheaper.

      At least here in France there is a nice section with horse in the supermarket next to beef etc. - I think it is actually bigger than sheep meat (opposite of my native Norway, where most supermarkets carry horse (and good ones, whale), but sheep is at least as common as cow).

    79. Re:Good Question by rullywowr · · Score: 1

      "Ahh....a'chilled a'monkey brains!".....

    80. Re:Good Question by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      a joke not for your aunt:

      Q: How do you eat a dog
      A: Put a hind leg over each of your ears

    81. Re:Good Question by rullywowr · · Score: 1

      You can always tell a happy motorcycle rider by the number of bugs in his teeth.

    82. Re:Good Question by cusco · · Score: 1

      Guinea pig (cuy) meat is similar to squirrel, except not as tough and without the gamey flavor that squirrels sometimes have. Of course we don't follow the American tradition of meat being the largest portion of the meal, so a big guinea pig could be cut up into portions for 4 people (or six kids), with the head being one or two portions.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    83. Re:Good Question by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in the US it is _illegal_

      It is illegal in some states, including California and New York. But I there is no federal law against butchering or eating horses.

    84. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a lactose intolerant westerner, I can ASSURE you that making cheese from milk does not remove all the lactose. It certainly removes some, but it definitely doesn't remove it all, nor does it make it okay for a lactose intolerant person to eat.

    85. Re:Good Question by slaughts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Except the laces keep getting stuck in my teeth...

    86. Re: Good Question by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I dunno..with reference too food and what I eat, I guess it has a lot to do with what I can afford.

      I'd don't generally eat animal "guts" or offal...I can afford the better cuts.

      I don't eat bugs because I don't have too.

      That being said, I'm usually good to try almost anything once to give it a try, providing there is plenty of alcohol involved, and no eating of genitals (no, I don't want any animals' balls no matter what the preparation is).

      I don't feel limited in any way by my food choices either...and I'm certainly not starving.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    87. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Louisiana? Whaaa?

      I mean if you replace 'goulash' with 'gumbo' that would be a start. And really nobody would consider cats down here, when there are so many other interesting things to eat, like dem gators.

      Basically what I'm saying here is that your joke was way off target. Looks like a couple people with mod points also don't know what you're talking about.

    88. Re: Good Question by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cows are work animals, though they are selectively bred for meat now. Try ploughing a field in a developing country where you can't afford kerosene for a tractor and then you'll appreciate the value of a cow!

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    89. Re:Good Question by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Go to a market in rural China sometime. Those people will eat about anything (and I'm not even joking).

      LOL, I said the first thing about the natives here in southern Louisiana when I first moved here, but they end up making it all taste good, so, I'm no longer the picky eater I was when I first moved down here.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    90. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure ease of farming is the real matter. I've had alligator and lion, and both were delicious. Nothing wrong with carnivore meat.

    91. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    92. Re:Good Question by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 1

      Roof-rabbits are poisonious? Where did you get that idea from? (a.k.a. "Citation please!")

    93. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, or use the french names for them:

      Crickets - grillons
      Mealworms - n. ver de farine
      Locusts - sauterelles

      Now tell me that Grillons & Sauterelles Jambalaya doesn't sound tasty!

    94. Re:Good Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Horse meat is very good (or so I hear) but because of the culture of horses as pets/companions rather than livestock, most Americans would shy away from eating it.

      Kinda, but not really. Most people I know couldn't give a rat's ass less about horses, outside getting stoned and watching My Little Pony, or putting their offspring up on one of the miniatures at the county fair.

      My wife comes from a family that raises horses, and their rationale seems a bit more reasonable: Very few horses in this country are bred for consumption. That being so, the vast majority of horses spend their lives being fed wormer to keep parasites out of their systems. Wormer is poison, and it builds up in the muscle tissue over time. Therefore, eating an American horse can kill you, or at least make you very, very sick, and thus it's not the best idea anyone ever had.

      Wormer is the dirty little secret that companies trying to build commercial horse slaughter plants don't want the public to know about.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    95. Re:Good Question by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong. You're supposed to PEEL them first.

    96. Re:Good Question by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Informative

      pigs and chickens are omnivores. anyone trying to sell you vegetarian-fed eggs/chicken is merely aiming at the market that thinks that vegetarian-fed somehow means better. chickens love to eat bugs, rodents, and lizards. a chicken raised strictly on grain is nutrient-deficient and probably shouldn't be eaten.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    97. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all the lactose, just some. For those of us properly lactose intolerant, a cheeseburger is hell without lactase pills.

    98. Re:Good Question by PRMan · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid at camp we killed a rattlesnake by dropping a large rock on its head. Then we made a fire and ate it. It was pretty good, if you ask me, somewhere between chicken and duck.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    99. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fish is not vegetarian?!?!

    100. Re:Good Question by PRMan · · Score: 1

      The prohibition came about because people were selling drugged up racehorses for meat, which causes major problems in humans. The easiest way to stop it was to stop all horse meat, since nobody really cared to eat horse that much anyway.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    101. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see the things your mother taught me.

    102. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right? too bad there is no other way, at all, to ever share photos online. there aren't even free services, where your identity cannot be easily identified. stupid internet.

    103. Re:Good Question by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      How did we get from Insects to Cats and Dogs exactly?.

    104. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.epicurious.com/articlesguides/blogs/editor/2009/03/eating-bugs-the.html
      The high class eating of insects.

    105. Re:Good Question by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      You say we eat cows, but when was the last time you ate cow tail, or tripe, or the stomach, or the heart or the tongue? We tend to be selective about which parts we consume or rather which parts we knowingly consume.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    106. Re:Good Question by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      And there's only a few places left in the world where you can actually get served dog in a restaurant.

      Most Asians now consider them pets and not a food source.

      Truth be told if the grocery store dried up today there would be zero stray cats and dogs in my hood.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    107. Re:Good Question by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I thought your "No More Sodomy" rule was a ruse

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    108. Re:Good Question by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I know what you're getting at there, but my first thought when I read "Put a hind leg over each of your ears" was that you'd actually be wearing the dog like a hat with its stomach resting on the top of your head.

    109. Re:Good Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      We've slaughtered them before, but always export the meat. It is illegal to sell in the US, which makes us raving silly hypocrites.

      American horses are filled with poisons, namely ivermectin. Often, over the life of a horse, these poisons can build up in the muscle tissue to levels that can be lethal to humans.

      Hypocrisy, nothing - it's illegal for the same reason the FDA puts a limit on how much rat shit can be in your Mcdonald's burger.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    110. Re: Good Question by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Better cut is relative.

      I don't/can't eat much offal either but ...

      The "better" cuts compare to offal nutritionally as corn does to green vegetables.

      Your eyes, your heart, your nerves, and other organs benefit from eating organ meat.
      For example, your heart benefits from the taurine in hearts.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    111. Re:Good Question by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Because it is really not tasty. I tried bear meat, was a waste of money, the meat has got a very unpleasant aftertaste.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    112. Re:Good Question by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      I tried bear meat stew, and thought it was quite delicious. Both anecdotes, neither fully answers my question.

    113. Re:Good Question by bossk538 · · Score: 1

      Care to provide a citation? Actually there is a very good economic reason why carnivore meat is not widely consumed: you will need to grow, say, 1,000 kg of grain to raise 100 kg of herbivore meat; for 100 kg carnivore meat, you will need to grow 10,000 kg of grain to feed 1,000 kg of herbivore to raise 100 kg of carnivore. Jared Diamond - whom I am paraphrasing here - claims to have tried lion meat and found it delicious.

    114. Re:Good Question by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      with the dog as a hat you could research the question,

      Q: which side of your dog has more hair
      A: the outside

    115. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to sell it for food, according to Reuters, but if you say otherwise I certainly cannot refute as I am not up on my federal food laws :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    116. Re: Good Question by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Your eyes, your heart, your nerves, and other organs benefit from eating organ meat. For example, your heart benefits from the taurine in hearts.

      Too much organ meat is bad for you from what I'd read....

      That being said, I don't rely on dead animal protien for all my needs, I do try to balance out my protein needs from as much plant based foods as possible. I'm cutting back on animal proteins, and for the most part they are my pleasure eats, but not my main source of protein and nutrition.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    117. Re:Good Question by Hackysack · · Score: 1

      That article is poor and slanted, there were a bunch of them all appearing at the same time last winter.
      Bad -
      CBC - http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2013/01/17/business-quinoa-prices.html
      Globe - http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/the-more-you-love-quinoa-the-more-you-hurt-peruvians-and-bolivians/article7409637/

      Better -
      A better more balanced series of articles appeared a couple months later, for example: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/20/world/americas/20bolivia.html?_r=0
      or http://www.slate.com/articles/life/food/2013/01/quinoa_bad_for_bolivian_and_peruvian_farmers_ignore_the_media_hand_wringing.html which appeared

    118. Re: Good Question by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Tho rarely discussed, in the Arctic, sled dogs are also eaten.

    119. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't you use an ox or something for that?

    120. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      But it's fine for us to package them into steaks and sell them to other people? Huh, no that doesn't seem hypocritical at all...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    121. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Right, but we only prohibited it for within the US - export was just fine! Who care if those filthy outsiders get sick from our doped horses, right?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    122. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. Frogs, fish, alligators, are the more common ones. But people do eat lions and stuff just fine. There are ethical and economical issues with eating lion, but it isn't poisonous.

    123. Re:Good Question by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      It's all in our heads. We choose to eat some animals (like cows) and not others (like cats) because of cultural reasons. Same with insects.

      It's a cultural thing. Traditionally humans have associated insects with "dirty" and "rotten" food - flies and maggots and whatnot, so evolution has basically kept that alive that insects are bad since it's associated with bad food. Our cultural traits reinforce this belief and explains the general "yuckiness" of eating bugs.

    124. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is believed among the first domesticated animal, raised for consumption were dogs.

      We were so primitive and cruel in those days. Domesticating an animal just so you can give it tuberculosis.

      Though I guess it seem no worse than being a purse dog these days I guess.

    125. Re:Good Question by jfengel · · Score: 1

      We don't eat carnivorous land animals. Some carnivorous fish, on the other hand, are so tasty that we're in the process of wiping them out.

    126. Re:Good Question by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      You can read the whole discussion, I believe its public, but it was through the association of them also being foods that are taboo to eat for no real reason beyond cultural preferences.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    127. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend loves tripe tacos, deep fried pig skin and boiled chickens' feet.
      I can't stand the idea, let alone get myself to enjoy it. -- Or kiss her afterwards.

    128. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of the big carnivores are endangered. Also, they are expensive to hunt and ship. Think of all the middlemen, distributors, importers, exporters, it takes to get a piece of lion meat from Africa to the United States. That lion meat might taste $15 good just fine, but if it costs you $35, only the rich would eat it. In the US, imported European cheeses are expensive, can be $17/lb or more. For most of us, spending that kind of money on cheese is an occasional thing, for a party, celebration, etc. In Europe, those same cheeses cost way less, that they can be consumed as everyday cheese.

    129. Re:Good Question by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Cicada are served in restaurants and eaten in the US {Kentucky} just not by me.

    130. Re: Good Question by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Try ploughing a field in a developing country where you can't afford kerosene for a tractor and then you'll appreciate the value of a cow!(*)

      Assuming by cow you actually mean a castrated male cow (commonly known as an 'Ox') I quite agree. As an added bonus it fertilizes the fields while you plow them.

    131. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I read about numerous accounts of indigenous people who knew not to eat the meat of predators and Europeans who didn't heed their warnings becoming gravely ill. I wasn't able to google up anything specific (I imagine I might have been able to if I had more time) but this might shine a little light on the subject.

    132. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider yourself lucky. If I forget the litter boxes, our older cat first irrigates the dirty laundry baskets. If I really forget the litter boxes, she'll leave a huge steamer by the back door, and I'm guessing she tries to hold it for a while because it's large enough that my wife once scolded the dog for it.

      Needless to say, I have to be terribly busy to forget the litter boxes.

      - T

    133. Re:Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an old wives' tale. Humans aren't horses, but they're both mammals and so are likely to have fundamentally similar biochemistry.

      I find it unlikely that something can accumulate at 400[1] times the lethal level for humans without killing the horse.

      [1] Based on a typical sized person eating a typical sized steak.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    134. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 2
      "Roof-rabbit?" I don't know whether to be amused or grossed-out that there's an alternate for "catmeat" but it sounds like it a more apt discription of a pigeon, not a cat. :p

      Anyhow, the toxicity of the flesh of a carnivore is going to depend heavily on the diet of said carnivore (with feral [domestic] felines in an urban environment likely consuming a highly-omnivorous diet given their role as a scavenger) and is probably nowhere near as toxic as, say, the meat of a jaguar.

      In any case, here's what I wrote in response to someone else with the same request for a citation:

      When I was a kid, I read about numerous accounts of indigenous people who knew not to eat the meat of predators and Europeans who didn't heed their warnings becoming gravely ill. I wasn't able to google up anything specific (I imagine I might have been able to if I had more time) but this might shine a little light on the subject.

    135. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're damned right it's in our heads.
      Most people work their asses off to improve their way of life, their life expectancy and their families. It's not something social, something trained, it's purely animal instinct.
      The reason why in France toads and snails are popular is because at one time in their past there was very little to eat. They made it a cultural thing, but most people would still go hungry and skip a meal instead.

      As for cultural mores, why not suggest long pig instead? It's guaranteed to have all the necesary nutrients, and the name speaks for itself concerning the taste.

      Show me a country where it's population isn't starving and eats bugs willingly, and I'll even try some myself. Oh, and I'm curious, about one thing. Are you talking about eating specific bugs, that would require some care? Or any will do, like palmetto bugs?

      Damned Renfield ...

    136. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about dead relatives?

    137. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats are also common ingredients in Chicken and Broccoli.

    138. Re:Good Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      But it's fine for us to package them into steaks and sell them to other people? Huh, no that doesn't seem hypocritical at all...

      Definitely got me there.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    139. Re: Good Question by lvxferre · · Score: 1

      Cows, not so much. I can't think of too many situations where a cow would be best suited as a work animal.

      Cows are a bit better than horses for some field work where resistance and tenacity matter more than speed, as grain mills or plowing field.

      You won't see them as much in this kind of work today just because they lost the competition to machines.

      I guess that the taboo against horses is less motivated by usefulness and more for empathy - the same happens with those freaking useless long-eared rats (rabbits - and yes, they taste as good as horses). It isn't that strong either - Switzerland, Japan, and some isolated places in South America with heavy German immigration often eat horse meat, and not a single eyebrow is raised against.

      --
      Nerdy news for your nerdy needs? http://www.soylentnews.org Soylent News is people!
    140. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A horse is no use to me, I live in an apartment... eat it!

    141. Re:Good Question by Greg01851 · · Score: 1

      "And since there's no hair they're easy to prepare for the oven." Perfect ending to a very reasonable post :)

    142. Re:Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Beef is bland? Scottish (especially well aged Angus) and Irish beef aren't, and neither is Argentine.

      Many moons ago I had a steak in one of those "shopping centre" restaurants (i.e. a step up from a Mickey D) in Sitt Ifrikeh. It was great. The taste was half way to venison. The clincher: with a couple of beers it cost what the beers alone would back home. I had some darn lekker food out there.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    143. Re:Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      IIRC I saw something on TV where they had a snake eating festival in Texas.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    144. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just a saying not a law contract. Sheesh.

    145. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't think of too many situations where a cow would be best suited as a work animal. So we eat cows, same with most kinds of pig.

      Got your causality backwards: we can't think of situations where bred for consumption cows would be good at work.

      OTOH, you surely must have seen photos like this before.

    146. Re:Good Question by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Damn, I thought you had a loophole that would let us sell rat shit burgers to Canada! :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    147. Re:Good Question by cusco · · Score: 1

      I wanted to try Angus one time, but he ran away to fast and his wife called the cops.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    148. Re: Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I hope you have an elevator. It's a veritable bugger of a job carrying one up several flights of stairs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    149. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all in our heads. We choose to eat some animals (like cows) and not others (like cats) because of cultural reasons. Same with insects.

      I call bollocks.

      Does a cow or a sheep look as hideous and unappealing as insects? I would have no issue touching a cow or pig or sheep or deer etc or walking amongst them. I would have no issue with walking amongst a field of plants grown for food, But the very thought of touching, or being touched by, or covered by creepy crawly insects, let alone EATING THEM, makes my stomach churn.

      Trying to say they are healthy or tasty in no way makes the very thought of eating insects any more appealing.

      There is a reason why humans have a natural revulsion for creepy crawly insects, and its got nothing to do with their nutrition or taste. The very look of insects, most especially when seen up close, is enough to cause a primal fear and revulsion in humans.

      Yuck yuck YUCK!!!

    150. Re:Good Question by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking when I first saw this. Since we can't take money away from killing people in the various deserts in order to feed the poor working class slaves, how about we eat bugs instead. It's a typical American political mindset to bandage a problem instead of addressing the root cause. Guns, drugs, crime, etc etc. Ban guns, war on drugs, imprison everyone. Crazy country indeed and I live in Texas. :P

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    151. Re:Good Question by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 1

      Cats look a lot like rabbits after they've been cleaned. ;) I believe the alternative comes one of the world wars where people couldn't be so picky about where their protein came from. (Pidgeons are by the way known as roof-rats.)

      Sure, there's biomagnification, but that applies as much to tuna, shark and other sea-living creatures that we eat without any ill effects. (If we don't overdo it of course.) I've been googling a bit myself, and though I did find a couple of recipes for dishes with cat, I found nothing to indicate that they are "highly toxic" as you previously stated. The closest I found was:
      "Scientists have said that those eating wild cats could be exposed to harmful bacteria and toxins.",
      which is true about all wild animals that we eat.

    152. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Inca ate guinea pig but not dog? Dogs are way more tasty and have more meat. For shame. (Full disclosure: I've eaten both. Guinea pig in Ecuador and dog in South Korea.)

    153. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pigs can be a work animal as well.

      fence off a part of a field and let the pigs go to town on it. No need to weed or plow when the pigs do all the hard work. They also fertilize the soil.

      Great for gardens. Like using free range chickens for taking care of ticks and other not useful insects.

      Even if the animal is a food animal, it can still be useful (except rabbits, they are only useful for food and Fur, their poop isn't really useful as a fertilizer and they need vegetables in order to live).

      This may not be useful for industrial farms, but for small holders and permaculture types, this is solid gold.

    154. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's not. It's often not -tasty-, but, with the exception, perhaps, of the platypus -- which is the only venomous mammal, no mammal is toxic to eat. You can certainly eat cat. Same with dolphin and all whales -- and dolphins and all the toothed whales are obligate carnivores. Several types of fish commonly eaten are obligate carnivores, such as tuna, mackerel, cod, barracuda, eel, smallmouth and largemouth bass, and all types of shark (though some of these -are- toxic without proper preparation -- and eaten anyway, like the greenland shark.)

    155. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickens are more useful laying eggs than cooking in a pot. So what? Dogs, horses, and chickens get old and can't work, so you slaughter and eat them.

      The whole "reserve" distinction is artificial. Until the advent of modern industrial livestock management, every animal worth keeping was also worth eating at some point. And you rarely kept animals simply for eating, because that's horribly inefficient. Even pigs ate the trash. Most other animals were at least milked. I just back from Mongolia where herders keep camels, horses, goats, and sheep. Each one of them serves multi-purposes, one of which is for meat.

    156. Re:Good Question by xaxa · · Score: 1

      So what do they taste like?

      Insects are most closely related to crustaceans. I haven't been able to try any larger insects, but I understand (from scientists I work with, who travel to remote places in the jungle and eat food they are offered as a gift) that they're pretty much like prawns, crayfish, crab, etc.

      I have eaten tiny insects (waxworms, crickets, and something else I forget) and they tasted of cajun seasoning. This was at the insect museum in New Orleans.

      in many cultures, eating shellfish is considered as strange as we think eating insects is.

      There are some good pictures here: http://edibug.wordpress.com/list-of-edible-insects/

    157. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I like eating pussy.

    158. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lobsters used to be only for the extremely poor. Even servants and slave would complain about getting fed too much lobster. A lobster is just a giant bug, of course. To me they're more disgusting than a grasshopper. (And I've eaten whole roasted grasshoppers in Mexico... tasty, but get stuck in your teeth like popcorn.)

      Solution to the insect problem: only breed and sell rare insects that poor people are unable to afford to eat. Within a generation hoards of middle-class people will be scarfing down the stuff, just like they scarf down all the trash from the sea that 30 years ago was only sold to the elite in Manhattan and Los Angeles.

      American's eat some truly disgusting stuff. I mean... just look at ground beef. Fewer things on this planet are grosser than that. The most vilest of organ meats looks better during preparation or on a plate than ground beef. Seriously. (Not that I'm grossed out about it, but just think about it. Once you realize how disgusting some of the stuff we eat is, it's much easier to dive into disgusting stuff on other people's plates.)

    159. Re:Good Question by Guppy · · Score: 1

      As a lactose intolerant westerner, I can ASSURE you that making cheese from milk does not remove all the lactose. It certainly removes some, but it definitely doesn't remove it all, nor does it make it okay for a lactose intolerant person to eat.

      Generally, the harder/sharper the cheese, the less lactose, since it is through time and fermentation that these characteristics are acquired. This assumes the cheese went through normal aging, however -- processed cheeses may gain their flavors via shortcuts which leave the lactose content largely intact.

    160. Re:Good Question by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Damn, I thought you had a loophole that would let us sell rat shit burgers to Canada! :)

      Just drown them in maple syrup and call 'em "Tasty Pucks;" the Canucks'll never know the difference.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    161. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with that attitude I hope you never encounter a bobcat...

    162. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about domestic horses that vets administer to or do you mean Mustangs? From what I understand, Mustangs are often the type of horse that ends up getting shipped to Europe as food. I would be surprised if they had high levels of ivermectin or other toxins.

    163. Re:Good Question by mendax · · Score: 1

      As I saw on a bumper sticker many years ago:

      CAT: THE OTHER WHITE MEAT

      Of course, my beloved evil black cat Sophie is looking out the window and not seeing me write this. I wouldn't want her to think that she would ever be on the menu. The only menu she wants to be on is the one that I can't read because she's standing on it demanding to be petted. I can't train her but she's got me pretty well trained.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    164. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I dunno, fish is healthy, and most fish we eat is not vegetarian.

      How do you get modded 'informative' by stating the obvious? NO fish is vegetarian. There's a separate term for that: pescetarian. They have a church near my house.

    165. Re: Good Question by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      A horse can do a large amount of work, they are more useful on the yoke than on the table. Same with dog. Dogs are more useful as a work animal than a food animal. Cows, not so much. I can't think of too many situations where a cow would be best suited as a work animal.

      Until the invention of the yoke, in about 400 AD, and its propagation to Europe in about 1000 AD, horses were nearly useless as draft animals. They're still less useful for ploughing and cart-pulling than oxen are in hot parasite-ridden countries because they're more delicate.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    166. Re: Good Question by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Castration isn't required. The bullocks used by my wife's family in her native country weren't castrated.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    167. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      As I saw on a bumper sticker many years ago:

      CAT: THE OTHER WHITE MEAT

      Perhaps it was a reference to the other kind of pussy? :)

    168. Re: Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Horse is not a reserve food.

      Yes it is. If you do something stupid like Napoleon did (invading Russia) or Hitler did (invading Russia) you ride it towards home until it drops dead.

      Then you eat it.

      See also: The British in Afghanistan (Battle of Gandamak) with their camels.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    169. Re: Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Until the invention of the yoke, in about 400 AD, and its propagation to Europe in about 1000 AD, horses were nearly useless as draft animals.

      100% wrong. Yokes aren't any use at all for horses, because in their preferred head-up posture it chokes them. They work for oxen because they put their heads down.

      For draught horses you want collars that spread the load over the chest & shoulders.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    170. Re:Good Question by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is even simpler. I can't walk into any grocer chain, specialty chain (Trader Joes, Whole Foods), or local grocer and purchase insects for consumption.

      That is the biggest hurdle facing many Americans. As a food source, insects aren't easy or convenient to obtain.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    171. Re:Good Question by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It is believed among the first domesticated animal, raised for consumption were dogs.

      By whom?

      I'd suspect a placid herbivore without pointy teeth would have been a better choice.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    172. Re:Good Question by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      "if we took the bones out, it wouldn't be crunchy!" Crunchy Frog - Monty Python

    173. Re: Good Question by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Cows, not so much. I can't think of too many situations where a cow would be best suited as a work animal.

      This is far from true. Cows (assuming male and female) are one of the most useful animals ever. They are equivalent to dogs in terms of usefulness. They are a dependable transport, good at hauling load, provide major labor in the field, provide mike (a whole food), provide yogurt, provide butter, provide fertilizer, provide fuel for fire (in two ways), provide leather upon death, and make more cows. Historically they have even provided security and warmth (cause they used to live in the same house as the owner).

      Horses are great for colder climates and drier terrain, but cows are better in hot, wetter, humid, and muddy terrain.

      Cows were such an integral part of a family that the only time they were eaten was upon natural death. However natural death mean it usually died of old age or some sort of disease so it was considered unhealthy. Later this was adopted into religion and made sacred so that society saw this act as dishonorable and unethical.

    174. Re: Good Question by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Castration is usually done cause it makes the animals more docile and easier to manage. In rage or fright an uncastrated male will kill you, but a castrated one will feel the slap you give it and stop. But no, it is not required. Normally one is kept around uncastrated (ie strongest of the litter), it also acts to calm all the other males.

    175. Re:Good Question by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's all in our heads. We choose to eat some animals (like cows) and not others (like cats) because of cultural reasons. Same with insects.

      How do they get the frass out of the insects that people eat? Because if they don't, some of that yummy cricket or Witchety grub is shit, and you're eating it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    176. Re:Good Question by varmfskii · · Score: 1

      Well known by whom? To the best of my knowledge there are only a very few cases where mammals are toxic to eat and they don't correlate with whether the mammals in question are carnivores, omnivores, or herbivores.

    177. Re: Good Question by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      It's required to be classified as an ox, but yes, that's not strictly required in order to use one as a draft animal.

      It has some advantages since it generally makes them calmer and easier to control, particularly if you're using teams (pairs) of oxen.

    178. Re:Good Question by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Nopz, neither Monty Python, nor Balut (thank you AC, I wasn't aware of its existence).

      The reference was to the Chinese story in the movie Three Extremes.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    179. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No (larger) mammal tends to have awful or even bad tasting meat in general. Beef, pork, lamb (or older), and horse, reindeer or moose meat are all different but none is categorically worse than the others. Certain meats (like pork or meat from a carnivorous animal like bear) need to be cooked more, though, which puts them at a disadvantage if you prefer your meat rare.

    180. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Most vegetables we eat aren't meat either.

      We should probably start eating human corpses too. All that meat and we just burn it or bury it - what a waste!

    181. Re:Good Question by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to BBQ a fly? It's extremely difficult to get it to come out with the right flavor and tends towards being to crunchy. And you just don't get that nice chewy texture! Heck finding buns to fit hot dogs is hard enough without finding buns to fit extruded bug guts. I don't really care what my food is made of so long as it's mashed into a nice faceless shape, bleached, dyed, and has lots of preservatives and artificial flavors added. If it doesn't eat you first or slap you then you can eat it.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    182. Re:Good Question by tloh · · Score: 1

      psst!
      You're not supposed to find out what's in your bowl of brown.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    183. Re: Good Question by Larryish · · Score: 1

      I just IM'd Mike, he said that he is NOT a whole food, and would rather not be eaten.

      Here, have some chicken instead.

    184. Re:Good Question by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Or maybe this:

      What do you call nuts on the wall?

      Walnuts.

      What do you call nuts on your chest?

      Chestnuts.

      What do you call nuts on your chin?

      A dick in your mouth.

    185. Re:Good Question by tloh · · Score: 1

      I find your interpretation rather racist. Plenty of delicious dark meat that are beloved among connoisseur. Some would argue those are the ones with actual meat. Just ask Sir Mix-a-Lot.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    186. Re:Good Question by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Try the Cabot (brand) Seriously Sharp Cheddar.

      It is available from Wal-Mart and other common big-box retailers, and contains very little lactose.

    187. Re:Good Question by Larryish · · Score: 1

      I stock my larder by waiting outside Whole Foods in my raep van.

      Plastic bag FTW!

    188. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      workhorses are better for that than cows

      apparently, developing countries aren't as advanced as we were 1000 years ago.

      besides multiple breeds of horses for various uses, there were also multiple breeds of dogs which were used for various tasks in hunting.

      there were even breeds of humans, though there's no evidence of systematic artificial selection...

    189. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, nice catch. Clearly meant milk. But I would venture Mike is a whole food. He has everything a body needs!

    190. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us have been eating insects for as long as we have owned motorcycles.

      I still remember getting that big juicy bee right in the eye.

    191. Re: Good Question by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      They assure me that the bullocks are superior. Bullocks are huge and powerful, and low maintenance.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    192. Re:Good Question by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      I'm not a connoisseur of bear meat, but in talking with those who are (or say they are) bear meat is better if their diet was berries than if their diet was salmon. Technically, I suppose, bears are omnivores and not carnivores.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    193. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Western civilization, it is taboo to eat dog. Whether you know someone that eats dog or not is irrelevant.

      Only until you're starving. Then it's all on the menu- dog, horse, cat, etc.
      In most parts of the world, people tend to avoid eating predators... game animals are easier to herd and give a better return on your investment of time and resources.
      Most food taboos are just a result of a culture placing more value on the animal than just as food. Some are not, however- the best example is the taboo against eating cow.

    194. Re:Good Question by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      Does being in our heads make it any less real/gross

    195. Re:Good Question by sjames · · Score: 1

      At least they take care of those damned flies.

    196. Re: Good Question by megrims · · Score: 1

      I can't think of too many situations where a cow would be best suited as a work animal.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxen . They're stronger than horses, albeit slower, and have quite a few working uses.

    197. Re: Good Question by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree- too much of anything can be bad for you. Even drinking water can kill you.

      Depending on your ethnic background that could be a good/great/ or not so good diet for you. For those of us with heinz 57 backgrounds, you just have to see what works for you and what doesn't. And who can tell quickly for the less visible effects?

      I've had some friends do very poorly on vegetarian diets (just basically sickly all the time) while some others who had similar eating habits did well.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    198. Re: Good Question by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Also known as an ox.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    199. Re: Good Question by deepseabird · · Score: 1

      Come on, cattle are much *better* work animals than horses. Working cattle can pull much harder than horses (it's the oxen that break new fields, pull timber out of the forest, drag stone...) cattle will not work themselves to death; cattle are much less fussy about their food (one of the benefits of four stomachs!); the harness (yoke) for working cattle is *much* simpler than the collar for a horse; they have much better traction in loose or muddy soil than horses; and oxen are (traditionally) directed by command rather than reins. By analogy, you can think of the difference between horses and cattle as being similar to the difference between a petrol (gasoline) engine and a diesel engine: horses have a lot of power, but cattle have a lot of torque. I don't know it to be so, but I believe that until relatively recent times an animal's value as living muscle outweighed any value it might have had as meat (and, of course, hide, bone and sinew). Once industrialisation took hold and steam engines (and subsequently internal combustion engines) became commonplace, the value of cattle as labour decreased and they started appearing on the plate more often. Both cattle and horses seem to have been originally domesticated as reserve food, but the utility of the animal's labour, in both instances, made them much more valuable alive and in harness: cattle for muscle, and horses for speed. The Domesday book (according to Walker (National Income in Domesday England)) puts the annual value of working livestock at about double that of non-working livestock (animals that are used for food/material). I believe that cattle comprised most the "working animal" category, which accounted for a tenth of the total number of animals. This suggests (very coarsely) that a working cow would have been something like twenty times more valuable than a beef animal. I don't think that the economy and technology of medieval Europe was all that different to the centuries that preceded it. Sure, horses and cows started out as ready food, but they quickly became *much* more valuable, and the equation has only slipped toward the table in recent times. Of course I could be wrong....

    200. Re:Good Question by Maritz · · Score: 1

      4) Stop eating dogs

      You almost lost me with 3, but 4 is the hook. I'm in.

      Fucking sick of dog.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    201. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quitters.

    202. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably still licks its own ass and drools. No, thanks.

      Animals belong alive and outside, or dead and on the dinner plate.

    203. Re:Good Question by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Here in Switzerland Horse is fairly common.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    204. Re:Good Question by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Why not? What biological or medical reason is there?

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    205. Re:Good Question by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      read the excellent answer for yourself a few posts down from user "Type44Q"

    206. Re:Good Question by delt0r · · Score: 1

      I have eaten cats just fine, and this is wild cat in NZ forest. You need some poisons to accumulate in the first place and this happens in fish too, yet we eat them just fine. In fact most fish are carnivores of carnivores.

      Sure if you just eat cat that may not be good for you over a life time. But then eating just rabbit isn't either. And rabbit is much more tasty than cat.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    207. Re: Good Question by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Well this bear was shot somewhere inland in New England, I suppose making berries far more likely than salmon to have dominated its diet, so that at least is consistent.

    208. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, white Glue (Elmer's) contains no animal products.

    209. Re:Good Question by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      One of ours will piss on things, or would...she did a very good job of training us to keep her litter box reasonable.

      We still occasionally get steamers, but, we have multiple cats and leaving a log out in the open is a common way for the dominant cat to remind everybody of his claim. Cats really are assholes, if not for their ability to bend human will to their own, I doubt we would tolerate them.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    210. Re:Good Question by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      In regards to point 3, I'm not so certain people will notice the difference between the two

    211. Re:Good Question by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      The pasteurization of milk inactivates the lactase found naturally in the milk. Lactase is an enzyme that lactose intolerant people don't make in their intestines. So some people that are lactose intolerant have found that they are able to drink raw milk.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    212. Re:Good Question by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Yep. I remember a reporter for the Beijing Olympics seeing scorpion (with pictures) on a stick right at the sidewalk vendors there. They definitely eat insects there. (Although scorpion is actually an arachnid, I think it is close enough that people who eat one will eat the other.)

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    213. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    214. Re: Good Question by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Cattle are/have been working animals in many times and places. We usually call them oxen when they are used to work, but most oxen are castrated males just like the steers we raise for meat. Cattle are slow so they're not quite as generally useful as horses, but they can pull a lot of weight so they can be effective for plowing and other similar tasks, and have also been used to draw wagons.

      You are correct that the balance of our uses of cattle have been for food, whereas horses have primarily been used for work. In traditional societies, cattle are mostly raised for milk in places where feed is common enough to allow domestication of cattle in one place (though unless you are Hindu you stew the cows when their milking days are done and use the male calves for veal), or for meat in areas of sparse feed where they must be ranged. Horses have widely been eaten, and the Mongolians used mare's milk to make kumis. (Mares are much more difficult to milk than cows and are also less productive, so milking horses is not a widespread practice.)

    215. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soilent Green?

    216. Re:Good Question by marnues · · Score: 1

      Dogs (and bears) are omnivores, not carnivores. I don't know any culture that eats cats or carnivorous canines.

    217. Re:Good Question by marnues · · Score: 1

      Don't spread FUD. Seriously don't.

    218. Re:Good Question by marnues · · Score: 1

      This is a man who knows steak.

    219. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a bit skeptical about using pigs to weed your garden, unless you mean clearing out weeds before planting. Otherwise, you are likely to find that the pigs ate the vegetables as well as the weeds.

    220. Re:Good Question by aurizon · · Score: 1

      Insects are small, we eat muscles of animals. I recall the Roman emperors ate birds tongues - it takes a lot of birds.
      So we need to breed large insects - grasshoppers, with large leg and thorax muscles the size of cows. At that time many muscle cuts will be doable.

      The grasshopperboys will use kangaroos for the roundup...

      That said, the way insects use spiracles to send air and grab CO2 from their tissues means there may well be structural limits on insect size. Large ones in the fossil record had large wingspans and small bodies, and they lived when we had 30% O2, at 21% we have smaller insects. Large fat grubs, like witchety grubs may be a partial diet if you like fat, or you can make Witchety Butter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchetty_grub.

      Sea "insects" are supported by the water and have larger bodies and gills, we eat these as lobsters and shrimps and many others.

      As to what land insects we will serve on table, later ages and starving people will determine this

    221. Re:Good Question by aurizon · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind, I placed "insects" in quotes, as I was referring to the various life forms that occupy similar niches, both predators and herbivores.

      The ones we eat, some like lobsters, shrimp are chitin covered, others like whelks and octopi are not, nontheless, we found ways to eat them.

      Krill overlap with shrimp, I wonder if they have a muscular and tasty body we may find edible, although msny seem quite small, I wonder if they can be bred and selected for size and serve as a food source. They are, of course, used as bulk food for animals, I wonder if fine krill, guts and all, made into a powder would serve as a protein source to make a tofu-like meat substitute? Of course, we will soon be growing meat, in tanks, and once we do that, why not chicken, lamb, shrimp etc.

      http://tinyurl.com/lgjp7e2

    222. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no no Roof Rat is the correct euphemism for Pigeon....

    223. Re:Good Question by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Cats know better than to "fight" humans in the way you describe.

      I'm not sure. My cat likes a very specific amount of petting. Pet him too much and he gets annoyed and starts lashing his tail. Pet him more and then out come the slashing claws!

    224. Re:Good Question by treegor · · Score: 2

      Speak for yourself; I find cat makes a fine goulash. Okay, well I might if I lived in Lousiana... :)

      If you lived on the Melmac and your name was Gordon Shumway, cats certainly would be your favorite food. )))

    225. Re:Good Question by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Do you remember the Saturday morning cartoon show??

    226. Re:Good Question by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Is that because they're not tasty or because they're not easy to farm? Some folks will say that dog tastes amazing, though I've never tried it myself.

      Farm? I mean you are aware that they will allow you to "adopt" your supper from two or three places in every mid-sized city?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    227. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's so untrue. Horse meat becomes tenderer and better with age. People eat horse meat in many parts of the world, including in my country. After the horse grows old and is no longer suitable for service, it is eaten. Before trying to come up with a just-so explanation, first look into whether what you're trying to explain is true or not.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_meat

    228. Re: Good Question by Optali · · Score: 1

      FYI cat's meat has a high content of toxins, that's why.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    229. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, what about rabbit starvation? Rabbits eat nothing but vegetation, but if you try to subsist solely on rabbit meat you die a horrible death due to malnutrition. On the flipside, cats are carnivores by preference but omnivores by necessity. Unless the cat you choose for dinner was raised by a rich family that fed it nothing but the finest cuts of meat, you're eating an animal that has consumed all manner of grains and veggies in its store-bought cat food, and if it's an alley cat there's no limit to what it will put in its stomach, be it animal or vegetable.

    230. Re:Good Question by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      They served as a dual purpose... dogs actually were a result of wolves domesticating themselves. The socialable wolves were not killed by humans as they hung out eating their scraps. The new dogs served as companions and were used as "reserve" food supply. Humans used to eat wild horses regularly, and later used them as a beast of burden AND a "reserve" food supply.

      Once you start having a relationship with something, you tend to want to avoid eating it, because you cannot undo it. So, you keep looking for another food source. Eventually, it becomes taboo.

      ===
      Most insects are not halel or kosher. Religious taboos come into play. It is so bad that the orthodox jews inspect every leaf of a lettuce, cabbage or other item that may (Gd forbid) hide an insect. Crazy Fanaticism.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    231. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your country puts kerosene in tractors?

    232. Re: Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "better" cuts compare to offal nutritionally as corn does to green vegetables.

      That's all wrong.
      They do not compare to offal nutritionally, offal rarely if ever have any fat. Sure, they often provide a lot of vitamins, minerals, and solids, but they are sorely lacking in energy. Yes, in a modern first-world society we consider fat "bad" and "unhealthy" but that's because we already get all the energy we need. In a more primitive living environment it's crucial, and fatty foods are one of the main reasons we were able to move away from mere subsistence living as a species. Also, eating a lot of offal will tend to give you too much of certain substances, which is decidedly unhealthy.

      For example, your heart benefits from the taurine in hearts.

      There is absolutely no proof of that whatsoever, and the effects of taurine on humans is still largely unknown.

      What we mean by a "better" cut are the portions of meat which are easier to consume and digest, and have less gristle and connective tissue. Usually more fat as well, which makes them taste better.

    233. Re:Good Question by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Humans aren't horses, but they're both mammals and so are likely to have fundamentally similar biochemistry.

      Similar does not mean equal. Any pet owner can tell you that there are foods humans can eat that will harm your pets and vice versa. (e.g. Grapes, raisins, onions, & garlic can cause kidney failure in dogs & cats.) This is why we can't just stop testing with animal models.

      There are a variety of drugs that are safe to use on horses but not on humans. One would be phenylbutazone, or "bute," a painkiller that will suppress human white blood cell production and, in conjunction with some other drugs, will destroy your liver. Bute is one of many horse NSAIDs not approved for use in humans.

      (Similarly many human OTC painkillers in the same class will kill your pets. Tylenol is also bad for pets, causing anemia in cats and liver toxicity in dogs.)

      I can't find anything about dewormers being poison, though. Apparently, most of the dewormers I saw were also used (in appropriate doses) in humans and dogs or simply have never been tested properly in humans. I looked up fenbendazole (not enough testing), ivermectin (used in humans), moxidectin (not used in humans but safe according to some tests I read), praziquantel (limited use in humans), and pyrantel pamoate (used in humans, but an uncertain risk to pregnant women). With the exception of the last, I'm not aware of any known risks from their presence in meat, but we just do not have enough knowledge on many to approve it for the general food supply.

      (On the subject of dogs, it worth noting that a few of these drugs -- the avermectins -- can be toxic to herding dogs but not to most other dog breeds. It makes their use in heartworm medicine tricky.)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    234. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not many will consider fish meat though since it's in its own category. Fish certainly is healthy and should be eaten maybe twice a week like meat. I think people eat too much meat in general. There's supposedly a formula on how much meat you should eat each week and such but I can't remember it. Something like meat, twice a week, strictly vegetarian 3 times, and the remainder fish. Unfortunately I don't remember where I read that. Eating any kind of animal will be a very strange concept 100-years from now I sure though since they aren't very efficient.

    235. Re:Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I just ate bear this week. Been doing that for 34 years now. Also cat in Vietnam and dog, though I didn't find it as tasty.
      -ZbirdDog

  2. LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Insects taste like shrimp, crab, or lobster. It's just the cultural bias that keeps people from eating them.

    1. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Insects generally have a lower meat to shell ratio than sea arthropods.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:LAND SHRIMP by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Insects taste like shrimp, crab, or lobster. It's just the cultural bias that keeps people from eating them.

      Psst, they're free if you know how to find the best habitat!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:LAND SHRIMP by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Camel spider can pass of Langestino Lobster.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:LAND SHRIMP by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      This may very well be a compelling enough argument for me to get over myself and eat them!

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Insects generally have a lower meat to shell ratio than sea arthropods.

      Yeah, but most insect shells are edible and have a lot of nutritional value in themselves.

    6. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Insects taste like shrimp, crab, or lobster. It's just the cultural bias that keeps people from eating them.

      I lived in Cambodia, where they eat tarantulas, for a few years. Talking with a Khmer co-worker one day, she mentioned that pan fried tarantula tastes like liver.

      I said, "Lady, if I'm eating a tarantula, it better taste like lobster".

      But then, I'll happily eat female blue crabs with the mustard and roe. I just couldn't get past the look of a furry tarantula.

    7. Re:LAND SHRIMP by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Insects taste like shrimp, crab, or lobster. It's just the cultural bias that keeps people from eating them.

      No, it's mostly economics. I looked into this a few months ago. The best flavor from an insect comes from a an emperor scorpion, which tastes much like shrimp. They take about 18 months to grow to a harvestable size and require about 20 gallons of space to stay healthy. They need lights if kept in captivity and cannot get along in large groups.

      From there, the amount of meat per volume goes way down, unless you're eating meal worms and crickets, which can be toasted as snacks or ground up to make various pastes (McBuggets?) but not enjoyed as a piece of meat.

      If I were to raise emperor scorpions on my farm, they would cost more than lobster (which may still be viable in some restaurants for an exotic option). In our current scheme all of the time, food, and habitat for the lobsters are 'free' and not included in the cost of the meal.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:LAND SHRIMP by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      Only as adults. The larva are just bags of protein.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    9. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Shark · · Score: 1

      One of my main issues is that while it is relatively easy to gut mammals and fish, the meat/feces ratio in insects is a bit above my threshold. I'm not familiar with the process but I don't think a lot of effort is made in insect cuisine to separate the meat from the insect's previous meals.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    10. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you actually eaten insects? Almost all of them taste different from each other and none of them taste like any sort of seafood. In fact many are very bitter, sour, etc. which gives them an odd taste. Then you have the exoskeleton which makes up a huge part of the mass of insects, unlike sea crustaceans.

      The taste and texture due to the exoskeleton makes them unpleasant for me personally.

    11. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame that shrimp crab and lobster are all revolting.

    12. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crab used to be free too. You just went down to the beach at the right time and picked some. In fact seafood used to be regarded as poor man's food. Over fishing made seafood more rare and made it pricey. It's still cheap in the right areas, all you need on the coast is a small boat, a trap and a personal use license.

    13. Re:LAND SHRIMP by John+Bokma · · Score: 2

      A scorpion is not an insect but an arachnid. Also, they are nocturnal and hence don't need light; I guess you meant a heat source. They are communal if you give them enough space.

    14. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insects taste like shrimp, crab, or lobster. It's just the cultural bias that keeps people from eating them.

      No, it's mostly economics. I looked into this a few months ago. The best flavor from an insect comes from a an emperor scorpion, which tastes much like shrimp.

      Okay, hold the phone. Scorpions. So we're not talking insects at all now, but "bugs", which includes scorpions and arthropods and thus-wait for it--shrimp, crab, and lobster.

      So it's not cultural bias that keeps people from eating bugs, it's cultural bias that keeps people from calling the bugs that they DO eat "bugs". Scorpion or lobster, who the hell cares? It's a bug. If you eat one, you just ate a bug. Just because there's a restaurant called "Red Lobster" doesn't mean they don't feed you bugs.

    15. Re:LAND SHRIMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure they do, but I do not like shrimp, crab, or lobster (which are related to spiders). Considering where I live, stating I do not like them can get odd looks, esp in the west and south :) I am more curious were this push for eating insects are coming from, seems odd to me. In any case between eating lobsters... and going vegan, I would chose vegan any day!

    16. Re:LAND SHRIMP by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yes, all good points - non-mammal meat sources would be a better term, and the lights were used as cheap heaters in the designs I looked at. The amount of space you need to raise them communally was larger than the space to raise them individually because they fight over territory and will kill each other. I also didn't see a viable way to harvest them in a communal setting sort of scooping up a habitat with a loader bucket, whereas with an individual tank the soil could be easily screened.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    17. Re:LAND SHRIMP by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      They need 25+C although they can handle 20C and below for short periods of time. You can keep 2, maybe 3 adults on 40x40cm. They need at least 15cm of substrate, more is better if they burrow (and makes it easier to keep 2-3 adults on 40x40). And if they burrow, yeah, harvesting is going to be not easy. As for food, I've read about someone who fed them pre-killed mice and the scorpions got much larger than most captive bred in the hobby; most captive bred are (much) smaller than wild collected in Africa.

    18. Re:LAND SHRIMP by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Fact is if we are switching to insects for sustainability reasons, it makes more sense to go vegetarian or full vegan than to eat a different source of meat. After all meat more or less only has what its eaten less what it uses to say alive. Thing is most of what an animal eats is to keep it alive.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    19. Re:LAND SHRIMP by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Very useful, thanks!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  3. Arrrrggghh it's Creepy crawly thing with legs by HxBro · · Score: 0

    Nuff said.

    1. Re:Arrrrggghh it's Creepy crawly thing with legs by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Nuff said.

      Yet, people will pay more for a crab with all of its legs than one missing one or two. Go figure.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Arrrrggghh it's Creepy crawly thing with legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that only makes sense, as most of the meat is in the legs. Do the math, would you rather pay x$ per pound with less usable meat, or more useable meat. With out the legs you get less meat, but pay the same $ per pound, making the crap less valuable. If i can not (avoid) pay for the body, and only get the legs, then that would be awesome!!!!!

    3. Re:Arrrrggghh it's Creepy crawly thing with legs by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Who could put something as disgusting as an insect into their mouth?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  4. I'm in. by Petersko · · Score: 1

    I'll give it a try. I just ask that it be cooked well. Give me some tasty recipes.

    1. Re:I'm in. by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

      You can dry roast mealworms in your oven and pulverize them in a blender or spice grinder for a cheap protein powder. It adds kind of a nutty flavor to whatever you put it in.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:I'm in. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I'll give it a try. I just ask that it be cooked well. Give me some tasty recipes.

      Feh, just toss a handful of grasshoppers or locust into your blender and make a protein shake. Add chocolate to taste.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Grab any one of the big black ants in the US (not fire ants or small ants), pinch the head off and eat it. They taste surprisingly good. If you're in Australia, the ants will eat you, but the ones with a green but taste like a lemon trop if you lick their thorax.

      Seriously though, the problem is that the "eat bugs and grubs" thing is focused on particularly disgusting insects: Grubs and maggots grow in rotting shit. Literally. They're the worst possible place to start. Grasshopers look alien, but at least they eat something reasonable, like grass. I'm sure that there are edible bugs that aren't gross.

      How about, though, let's start with using them in chicken and pig feed, and reduce the impact of those. That will, in itself, have a net positive impact on the planet.

    4. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in Australia, the ants will eat you,.

      Isn't this pretty much the norm down there? Everything wants to kill you, and is really good at doing so?

    5. Re:I'm in. by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

      Don't grind them up! Grasshoppers and locust are about the perfect junk food. An ideal junk food should crunch on the first bite and then be soft and squishy. Think any kind of cookie or biscuit, chocolate ice cream bars, even apples. That's a grasshopper for you. Deep fry it, coat with chile or other spices, crunch and enjoy.

    6. Re:I'm in. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I'll give it a try. I just ask that it be cooked well. Give me some tasty recipes.

      Feh, just toss a handful of grasshoppers or locust into your blender and make a protein shake. Add chocolate to taste.

      There was an episode in the first season of Buffy where the new science teacher was a mind-altering praying mantis. She ate a grasshopper sandwich as a snack. I believe that this was the moment the audience knew there was something wrong with her. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re:I'm in. by Indras · · Score: 2

      You can dry roast mealworms in your oven and pulverize them in a blender or spice grinder for a cheap protein powder. It adds kind of a nutty flavor to whatever you put it in.

      I could definitely try this. There is a certain revulsion towards eating insects due to the appearance. Imagine opening a bag of flour and finding some maggots crawling inside... you'd just throw the whole bag away. At that point, even if you filter them out, the flour is "tainted" in your mind and is no longer edible. Same goes for a spot of mold on a slice of bread.

      However, if you could simply grind them up into a powder or paste and eliminate the visual association, I would certainly not be against including them in my diet!

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    8. Re:I'm in. by cusco · · Score: 1

      Huaytampo are the pupa of an Andean butterfly. Fry them together with hard corn (canchita, which they eat instead of popcorn), salt and serve. Tasty. If you go huaytampo-hunting too early, before they've formed their chrysalis, you can eat the caterpillars instead, but you need to fry them separately first because the water has to cook out.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    9. Re:I'm in. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Give me some tasty recipes.

      1. Feed insects to chickens.
      2. Cook and eat chickens.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    10. Re:I'm in. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      At that point, even if you filter them out, the flour is "tainted" in your mind and is no longer edible. Same goes for a spot of mold on a slice of bread.

      Well, to be fair, that's actually accurate in the case of bread. The mold you can see belies the presence of the mold you can't see. By the time mold density is big enough to see, it's all throughout the rest of the bread already.

      Of course, mold below those thresholds is *probably* safe. But it's best not to risk it if it's gotten that far in part of the bread.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    11. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soft & squishy? Like their intestines? No thanks...

    12. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. PLUCKIT!!!!

    13. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can do that, but your losses are going to be significant. I believe it takes about 25 lbs of feed to get a single chicken up to slaughter weight, resulting in about a 2 to 3 lbs of meat. Thats a 10% return on the input, not all that efficient. The best thing would be to directly use the insects. The only significant advantage to feeding the insects to the chickens would be if the insects were raised on something that was otherwise useless. Like corn stalks, waste products, post processed vegetable matter, etc and no direct use of the insects themselves was available. Conversion from one medium to another (whether it be feed, fuel, electricity, ect) always results in a loss, sometimes that loss can be minimal (Charging a battery from a wall outlet I believe results in a 3-5% loss) or severe (99.3% loss for some incandescent light bulbs).

    14. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Grab any one of the big black ants in the US (not fire ants or small ants), pinch the head off and eat it. They taste surprisingly good. If you're in Australia, the ants will eat you, but the ones with a green but taste like a lemon trop if you lick their thorax.

      Seriously though, the problem is that the "eat bugs and grubs" thing is focused on particularly disgusting insects: Grubs and maggots grow in rotting shit. Literally. They're the worst possible place to start.

      But they have personality, and personality goes a long way.

    15. Re:I'm in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can take large grasshoppers or locusts, remove the wings and legs and head, and batter-coat them and deep-fry them like fried shrimp.

    16. Re:I'm in. by Artea · · Score: 1

      A++ Good Recipe.
      Tastes Like Chicken

  5. wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmm wait for it, wait for it...TASTE!

    SA has become a joke of a magazine.

    1. Re:wait for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh, AND I'll explain why (always bugs me people don't (pun intended, wait for it...)):

      The point is that it's not to do with actual taste but a pshycological distaste in western culture.

      AC has become a joke of a poster.

    2. Re:wait for it... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Ummmm wait for it, wait for it...TASTE!

      SA has become a joke of a magazine.

      Some bugs taste great. Ever have fried locust? Puts hamburgers to shame.

      If it weren't form some weird stigma we could eat like ... uh ... even more pigs!

      Where it's their source of protein, some people have no problems with eating big chewy beetles, grubs and worms.

      omnivore nom nom nom

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. In Florida, the insects eat you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Florida, the insects eat you.

    1. Re:In Florida, the insects eat you. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      In Florida, the insects eat you.

      Only if you don't bathe in DEET. Ha!

      excuse me, I'm going to molt my skin now.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  7. They're gross looking by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is this some mystery? The *smart* thing for humanity would be to eat nutrition sticks composed of a solid mash giving us all the nutrients we need for a day. But, we're humans not robots so we don't simply dismiss emotion from our diets.

    For those of you who disagree, cicada season will be here shortly. I invite you to test out your theory in your backyard.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:They're gross looking by jovius · · Score: 1

      True. I'd guess processed insects will be introduced to replace some ingredients, and the first mass marketed products could be flours and such powders.

      There already are insect parts in our diets.

    2. Re:They're gross looking by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Do you know anyplace that actually really makes meal sticks or something like that. I have actually looked at all the ones I can find are very poorly researched in terms of nutrition. They just go for natural ingredients and consider that healthy without any other testing.

      I want a well researched meal replacement system that is actually healthy long term and simple.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    3. Re:They're gross looking by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Put insects in pot brownies to make them more attractive. If you want a buzz, you have to ingest a grasshopper.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    4. Re:They're gross looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they make yogurt so pretty....

    5. Re:They're gross looking by ravrazor · · Score: 2

      I went through the same thing and ended up looking at Ensure (or similar type) meal replacement shakes as a possibility...my wife rightly pointed out that no matter how easy it made lunches, it would just make everyone who looked in the office fridge and found out they were mine think I was dying of cancer.

    6. Re:They're gross looking by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. If they made such a product and it was well researched for effective nutrition, I would consider going on such a diet for a few months if it meant almost no prep and I could loose a bunch of fat weight.

    7. Re:They're gross looking by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Funny

      For those of you who disagree, cicada season will be here shortly. I invite you to test out your theory in your backyard.

      I looked into it - supposedly they taste like asparagus. I dislike asparagus!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:They're gross looking by Jonboy+X · · Score: 2

      These were awesome, back when you could get 'em: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilberito

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    9. Re:They're gross looking by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I would add, people don't eat based on rational ideas of nutrition, they eat what will taste good.

      The article has one sentence on how insects taste, and most of the rest is telling us how stupid we are. The article would have been more effective if it had been a list of recipes, with pretty pictures (and maybe some advice on how to get the ingredients. I don't kill my own cows, I'm not going to kill my own insects).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:They're gross looking by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      We actually use one of those protein shakes for our youngest son. He's a picky eater and refuses to eat breakfast most days. Sending him to school on an empty stomach isn't an option so we buy chocolate protein shakes. He thinks he's just having "chocolate drink" for breakfast, but he's actually getting some protein and vitamins.

      Personally, I wouldn't be able to take eating "meal sticks" or "meal shakes" all the time. I prefer real food. (When I'm watching my calories, I find creative ways to eat real food while not eating high fat/high calorie foods. Mostly via portion control and ingredient substitution.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    11. Re:They're gross looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cicada season is already here. And I'd love some sort of nutrition stick that was a complete and balanced meal as long as it didn't taste horrible. Or Bachelor Chow...

    12. Re:They're gross looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slim Jim & other jerky products. tempeh. And on and on. Could throw in Pop Tarts as well.

      Just look in the 7th Day Adventist section at your grocery store.

    13. Re:They're gross looking by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2

      Try the powdered version. I used to 'premix' non-fat dry milk and an ensure powder. In the morning I'd put 1/2c in an empty sealable drinking container and take it with me to work. If I were too busy to eat a proper lunch, I'd fill up the drinking container from the water fountain, give it a few shakes, and at least have something to keep me from getting ravenous.

      I liked it because I could forget the premade lunch at work, or in my car without it going bad since it was powder until the moment I decided to eat.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    14. Re:They're gross looking by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      I do not know if it would work, but there might be a future for bags of "human food". There are newer regulations coming down the pipe that will place stricter food safety regulations on feed mills. I recently read a paper put out on the new Magnolia Feed Mill which exposed me to some of these topics. Some of these processes that make things like feed stock for animals could some day be morphed into less-high-energy food stuffs for humans. (Unlike the hogs in the barn down the road, weight gain per pounds fed isn't supposed to be the goal - contrary to the modern American diet as some consume.) If there were flavors and such added you could make quality food out of barley, wheat, soy, oats, etc... The infrastructure would already be mostly there with most of the needed safety in place. I obviously would not think the current market would go for it if it was executed wrong or marketed wrong but it could be about like eating a soy protein bar.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    15. Re:They're gross looking by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      I don't actually care what other people think. The problem is that those things are not very good for you. Sure they are better than a lot of things but still not very good. I have not seen an actually researched and well designed meal replacement system. Most of what I have seen is just an attempt to trick people or made by people that really have no clue.

      At least most of the meal replacement shakes I looked at were not really balanced around what your body needs on an ongoing basis. Sure you could replace a meal per day with them and not suffer much damage but not all your meals on an ongoing basis. I have also seen a lot of all natural ones and that is about all they have going for them since research and designed for long term usage did not go into them. Actually I am not worried about the all natural part at all. There are many chemicals we need that are easier for us to absorb in versions that are not what are normally found in nature and vastly cheaper to make.

      We are just chemical robots. I am just looking for a better chemical supply to keep this body working efficiently until I can get it replaced.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    16. Re:They're gross looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that if you want it to have good shelf life, etc., then you're going to have to use the same food processing techniques you see in the existing food industry, and those techniques are hell on nutrients. And if you don't care about shelf life, you may as well eat actual food.

    17. Re:They're gross looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop eating carbohydrates. Eat no starch or sugar. No beer (liquor with sugarless mixers is ok if you drink). No fruits other than whole berries. No starchy vegetables. Lots and lots of protein, fat, and green stuff. Learn to make real food. I dropped 80 lbs in six months and have kept it off for almost a year without portion controlling at all.

    18. Re:They're gross looking by JazzLad · · Score: 1
      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    19. Re:They're gross looking by terrab0t · · Score: 1

      There is a new product in pre-production the does exactly what you described. It's nutrition shake, not a solid food though. They should be shipping regular orders by sometime this fall.

      For something closer to what you described, and more relevant to this post, NASA is funding research on a complete daily nutrition solid that may use an insect source for protein. This may be licensed as a commercial product sometime in the future.

    20. Re:They're gross looking by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      I think that's why this guy made Soylent but I don't think it has been around long enough (or used widely enough) to know if it's healthy long term or not. If you read the site's blog or the creator's person blog you'll see that they've put a lot of research in but that's not enough for me to risk it.

    21. Re:They're gross looking by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Ever tried to buy nutrition sticks? It's not the easiest thing to do. Try to find a pill, stick, or something like that that includes all the vitamins, protein, calories, etc that you need to live without any additional food. All I've seen were either missing major elements or cost so much as to not really be worth eating instead of food. I guess other than geeky people that aren't supposed to eat anything they actually like anymore there isn't a large market for nutrition sticks. Heck, I have clerks at the grocery store ask me what turnips are when I buy them so I guess they sell a lot more packaged stuff loaded with carbs and artificial flavors.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    22. Re:They're gross looking by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      The minerals, amino acids, sugars etc should all be stable in dried form. It should be very viable to create a healthy powdered drink that just requires adding water.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    23. Re:They're gross looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *smart* thing for humanity would be to eat nutrition sticks composed of a solid mash giving us all the nutrients we need for a day.

      That would be brilliant!

      I don't particularly care what the food is so nutrition sticks would be freakin' awesome, never even thought of that. Have the nutrition sticks in couple of flavors just to have a tiny bit of variety and presto! The day they release that stuff is the day I tear down my kitchen and turn it into a spare room =)

    24. Re:They're gross looking by metlin · · Score: 1

      I drink protein shakes as one or more of my meals on a regular basis. I keep a tub of protein handy, and I am more likely to have a whey shake for breakfast or dinner than an actual meal.

      Sometimes, I have an actual meal but limit the portions substantially so that I can meet my macros by having a few scoops of whey instead. Pretty healthy and easy to meet your goals.

      To the OP who remarked that people don't eat meal sticks, MREs are extremely common -- people who spend any extended amount of time outdoors or in inhospitable climes (ever been on a long and arduous climb or hike?), military personnel on the field, and folks who have traveled to exotic locales all eat MREs, which are nothing more than glorified "meal sticks".

      In addition, any reasonably fit athlete will consume some pretty tasteless food in the form of protein shakes and other healthy "meals". Sure, they have flavor, but that's only to mask what would otherwise be absolutely unpalatable. And after a while, you even start associating some flavors negatively (after 4 years of having a vanilla whey shake with peanut butter and banana, I am staying far, far away from the combination for a long time to come).

  8. Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 0

    and we pay extra to eat them

    --
    >;k
    1. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Didn't use to be that way. They got turned into gourmet items in a process that rather reminds me of Discworld's gourmet muddy old boots. In colonial Massachusetts there was a servant strike; one of the concessions made to return peace was a contract stating, among other things, that the servants would not be forced to eat lobster more than three times a week.

    2. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      and we pay extra to eat them

      Crawdads, too! Mudbugs!

      I had some of these at Popeye's, like itty bitty lobsters.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those different animals altogether, they are arthropods though, sort of in the same way that you and a dog are both mammals.

      Are you a dog?

    4. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shrimp, lobsters, and crabs are insects in the same way that dogs, wolves, and coyotes are primates.

    5. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They're not.

    6. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by paiute · · Score: 1

      In colonial Massachusetts there was a servant strike; one of the concessions made to return peace was a contract stating, among other things, that the servants would not be forced to eat lobster more than three times a week.

      We find that amusing, but I will bet you that those lobsters were not properly cooked and tasted like shite.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    7. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      shrimp etc are the cockroaches of the sea

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    8. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't! Plus, insects are spider food... and I don't want anything to do with them.

    9. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by mjr167 · · Score: 2

      Ever tried lobster without the butter? Can you think of anything that is not yummy when drenched in butter?

    10. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the above are insects; they're arthropods, but none of them have six legs.

    11. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? No they're not. They're invertebrates but they're not insects.

    12. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by agapeton · · Score: 5, Informative

      Arthropod != Insect

    13. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by sjames · · Score: 1

      At one time, contracts for indentured servants limited the number of times the servant could be required to eat lobster in a week.

    14. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects

      No, they're not. Insects and crabs share the same phylum: arthropods.

      For reference we're on the phlum chordata. This includes things such as mammals, all fish (bony, otherwise and even jawless), hagfish (weird craniates which aren't really quite vertebrates), lancelets (kind of small brainless proto-proto-proto-fish) and sea squirts which are sessile bag shaped filter feeding blobs.

      Now crustacians is still quite broad but doesn't contain insects. It does however contain woodlice and that really, really gross parasite which eats the fishes tounge and then spends the rest of its life acting as the fishes tounge.

      *shudder*

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plutonium?

    16. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Holi · · Score: 2

      Yes, I eat lobster without butter often, I also eat soft shell clams (STEAMERS) without butter (the broth is enough). Honestly, if you don;t like it without slatering it in butter save it for those of us who actually like it. (sorry but water is getting warmer here in the northeast and it is driving the lobsters north)

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    17. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.

    18. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Aside from them not being insects, they're all big enough for us to remove the exoskeleton and viscera. First thing you learn when eating these things is, "throw away the green gooey thing". You spend a lot of time extracting the tasty white parts, which is part of why eating crab and lobster isn't my cup of tea. The other reason is that I'm possibly sensitive to things in crab and lobster. They sometimes accumulate things that cause allergic reactions. My father broke out big-time once from eating crabs. Small insects may or may not tend to accumulate such toxins. It's a moot point though. I have no desire to eat the skeleton or the insect equivalent of the green gooey thing. Even if you find some really big bug that can be filleted, I just don't want to eat it. That should be reason enough. I suspect there might be a "reverse Streisand effect" too. The elites have been advocating for this every few months recently, so if we were ambivalent about it before, we're even more suspicious now.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    19. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you'd get tired of lobster daily if you had to crack the shell and dig the meat out yourself each time.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    20. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Dakiraun · · Score: 1

      ... which is exactly why I don't eat them either. Blech.

    21. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      It has more to do with the fat content. We were told for some many years that fat is bad that we forget that fat is necissary for the absorption of a lot of nutrients. Lobster, by itself, has almost no fat. Eat it as your primary protein (almost sole protein for those workers if the reports are to be believed) for weeks, months, and years on end and you're end up with all kinds of health issues.

    22. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by j-beda · · Score: 1

      My friend from the Newfoundland reported an early childhood memory of a dinner table argument that finished "Well, when we are as rich as the Jones family then we can eat hamburger, but until then quit complaining and finish your lobster!".

      She also reported that she always found it strange that in movies and on TV the visible minorities were always the "lower class" characters, whereas her experience was that the visible minorities who had emigrated to "the rock" were almost exclusively professionals (lawyers, doctors, etc) who were upper-middle-class or richer. It was only after moving to a big city on "the mainland" that she encountered large numbers of visible minorities, and the first time she met any who were not well-off.

    23. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...that really, really gross parasite which eats the fishes tounge and then spends the rest of its life acting as the fishes tounge.

      *shudder*

      Holy crap, that exists - the entire wikipedia article should be enclosed in squick tags. And kudos to Google for finding it from a reduced cut-and-paste of the relevant part of your post, even with "tongue" misspelled.

      - T

    24. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In space, no one can hear you bark.

    25. Re:Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs are Insects by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Sure, when cooked well the lobster is awesome and needs no butter. I can tell you that when cooked poorly no amount of butter will make it taste good. When I was in the Navy we would have a lobster day every couple of years or so. The smell alone would have kept me from eating it.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  9. Processed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if you turned it into something that didn't look, feel, or taste like insects I might consider eating it.

    1. Re:Processed? by zlives · · Score: 2

      use lots of corn syrup.

  10. because we can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I eat a bowl of spiders, scorpions, ticks and mites when I can have a cheeseburger? When all the farm animals die of global warming I will consider it.

  11. Cuz they're BUGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuck!

    /sarcasm

  12. Uh... by korbulon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would you like flies with that?

    *crickets*

    1. Re:Uh... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Would you like flies with that?

      *crickets*

      Yes please .. I'll have a serving of crickets, and if you have them can I get a serve of Snowy Tree Crickets to go??

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Waiter, there's some soup in my flies!"

  13. They're gross, that's what. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll leave the "gock" or however it's spelled, and the tube grubs to the Klingons and ferengis. I'd have to be pretty damned hungry to eat bugs.

    1. Re:They're gross, that's what. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Gagh, the Klingon live worm dish that you are thinking of. It's quite an interesting food. You prepare it by putting the worms in a bowl, and pour an blood-based herb sauce on the worms, which they devour, but its poisonous to the worms, so they die within minutes. BUT, after you poison them, but before they die is when you eat them; the "best" part is when you crunch them in your teeth, releasing the blood the worms ate into your mouth.

      Tube grubs are strictly Ferengi, and more of a snack food than a main course.

  14. "Eww it's like a pus explosion in my mouth!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is pretty close to what the guy (Bear Grillis [sp?]) said when he ate a bug on one of those survival shows.

    1. Re:"Eww it's like a pus explosion in my mouth!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is from a guy who drinks his own piss!

    2. Re:"Eww it's like a pus explosion in my mouth!" by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another paraphrased quote:

      "When I eat bugs, it always tastes like they get a last bit of revenge on me by taking a dump in my mouth."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  15. What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by capebretonsux · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects?

    Windshields.

    1. Re:What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by instagib · · Score: 1

      I use a bicycle, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Or full-face helmets (also keeps you from eating pavement).

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Goddammit, already spent my mod points today.

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    4. Re:What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I use a bicycle, you insensitive clod!

      If you rode a motorcycle, you would eat plenty.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    5. Re:What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of that old joke ...

      Q. How do you tell a happy biker?
      A. His teeth is full of bugs. :-)

    6. Re:What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It works with a bicycle just fine because one tends to breathe through the mouth when going fast.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  16. First Prawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bug growing kit would be great for feeding chickens or ducks, or other animals suited to growing in small gardens.

    Chickens that feed on bugs lay eggs with much darker yolks due to the high protein diet.

    1. Re:First Prawn by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      This is a much better use of insects than eating them directly. Of course, you don't want livestock eating them exclusively, but as a supplement it's probably ok. Most birds eat some insects anyway.

    2. Re:First Prawn by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Also good for fish-farms (according to Australian research), instead of basically strip-mining whitefish stocks to grind up for protein.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  17. Well, do it, then by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    The insect thing has been brought up multiple times in the western media already. So what are we waiting for? Shouldn't someone already set up an insect farm and make a deal with a supermarket? Personally, I'm cool with the idea.

    1. Re:Well, do it, then by Hentes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no food shortage, thus no incentive, no problem that eating bugs could solve. We could just as well go vegetarian, we just don't do it because we can afford to live better. That's like asking why don't we live in tents. Because we can afford not to.

    2. Re:Well, do it, then by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Because anyone smart enough to run a supermarket knows that counterspace allocated for bugs will simply reduce his profits, not only for that counterspace, but for his entire store. People will go out of their way to avoid even SEEING bugs, nevermind eat them. That instinct exists for a reason.

    3. Re:Well, do it, then by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't someone already set up an insect farm and make a deal with a supermarket?

      Health inspectors would shut them down. Reason: Bugs everywhere.

      (Seriously, I'm surprised someone isn't raising insect larvae for bulk protein for the feed-lot industry.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    4. Re:Well, do it, then by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I'd rather live as a gypsy with some sort of fold-out home in a box but mostly don't because other people find that weird and thus it doesn't fit well into our social structure. Try filling out a job application and when they ask your address put "parking lot".. yeah makes it difficult. I think that's why most our nomads are either social dropouts (we even call them homeless) or old enough and wealthy enough to not need employment anymore. So it's not really because I can afford not to live in a tent so much as socialization.. and probably the same is true with eating insects. If it suddenly became cool to eat raw insects people would do it and spend more for it even if it's pretty gross.. like sushi.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  18. All programmers already eat Bugs by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Yummy, yummy bugs.

    I used to get by on the radiation from my CRT, but since LCD monitors I have to get my nutrition from bugs. Unfortunately, the internet is so full of bugs I'm considering going on a diet.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. Mc Donalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone?

  20. Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by silviuc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how much I'm trying to train my brain it still thinks that insects and their larval forms are absolutely repulsive. You can't defeat that unless you have grown up eating those things and then it's the norm. In a "survival" scenario we might be able to overcome the repulsion as the hunger sensation might override our other instincts. Anyway, I reckon that, for my remaining life span, pigs, cows, chicken, turkeys, rabbits... etc won't go extinct and neither will we suddenly lose the ability to grow them..

    Ugh that risotto with grubs did not help either... yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh!

    1. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

      Les Stroud (Survivorman) calls it plate fright. You need to be really hungry to overcome it.

    2. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are two problems here:

      1. Some insects flock to filth. So culturally we consider insects as being unclean (roaches in particular are associated with unhealthy living conditions).

      2. No one seems to want to put effort into preparing the insects before they try to get people to eat them. While I like shrimp I would not be interested in popping a living shrimp in my mouth. Similarly I would be much more willing to eat a cockroach if it had been decapitated and cooked first.

      Corollary to #2. The less you have to dismember the insect yourself the better. Blue crabs are really popular where I live but something like 1 in 5 people refuse to eat them the "traditional" way where you tear apart the boiled crab yourself, and many more refuse at first and need to be peer pressured into it before they decide they like it. They usually will eat crab cakes or crab soup however.

    3. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whole insects would be a no go for many people because of cultural bias.

      However my guess is that the issue is in the form factor more than the product, and products made from insect flour (such as the powerbars sold by Chapul) would be perfectly fine for a large number of those people.

    4. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Maybe your preconceptions would change if you're stopped thinking about it and started doing it. In other words, it's all in your head.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    5. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I can only remember one time that I ate bugs and it was completely by accident. I had made a cup of hot chocolate from a powdered mix. I got to the bottom and there was chocolate sludge on the bottom (like there always seems to be). As I was eating it, I asked my mother if the chocolate was supposed to be moving. Mealworms had infested the hot chocolate. I believe it took me awhile to be able to drink hot chocolate again after that.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by cusco · · Score: 1

      You can't defeat that unless you have grown up eating those things

      Baloney. I grew up in northern Michigan where the only bugs we ate were those we couldn't spit back out while riding bikes. It's a cultural thing, and Americans are some of the most culturally rigid people that I've seen. Most other peoples will try something new, even Japanese and French tourists will try eating guinea pig or drinking chicha while in Peru. Very, very few Americans will, and I'm proud to say that my family is among them. I've tried huaytampo (an Andean butterfly pupa) and liked it, and wouldn't hesitate to try other insects. Neither would my brother or one of my sisters. You miss a whole range of yumminess by limiting your food choices that way.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by Solandri · · Score: 1

      No matter how much I'm trying to train my brain it still thinks that insects and their larval forms are absolutely repulsive. You can't defeat that unless you have grown up eating those things and then it's the norm.

      You have grown up eating insects. They're everywhere, so it's impossible to avoid them in mass food production. The FDA has guidelines for how much is allowable in food that's sold for consumption.

      It's all in your head. Youtube is full of videos of people trying "sushi" for the first time, and gagging while eating California rolls. California rolls don't have any raw fish. It's (cooked) imitation crab meat, cucumber, avocado, seaweed, and rice.

    8. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per a recent report shown on the CNN and HLN morning shows, carmine has once again been highlighted for being derived from insect carcasses. I was dumbfounded that it got the few seconds of national news attention that it did. The most common alternative, Red #40, comes from coal tar, but you don't see CSPI trying to provoke the ick response over that. If we can't even get past a bug-based food coloring that we otherwise wouldn't even know was there, there's little hope that most of us will ever be open to roasted mealworms as an option for topping baked potatoes.

      - T

    9. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by metlin · · Score: 1

      I would chalk that up to cultural conditioning more than anything else. As someone who was raised a vegetarian, I feel the same way about pretty much any and all meat -- it's absolutely disgusting and even looking at it turns my stomach.

      However, over the years, my tolerance and reactions to the presence of meat has improved significantly -- while I still do not consume any, I certainly don't gag when I see someone eating meat.

      I suspect your reactions to insects are quite similar.

    10. Re: Yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Ugh that risotto with grubs did not help either... yuuuuucckkkkk! Bleah! Ugh!

      And yet there is at least one group of native people living in the forests of Indonesia, The Koroway, who regularly eat Capricorn beetle grubs taken from rotten Sago tree logs.

  21. Back in my day . . . by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Well it used to be Western cultures were less squeamish about eating all parts of the animal as well. I think pig's cheek was considered a delicacy in upper Victorian society. Yet these days, processed synthetic foods are accepted more than natural food.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Back in my day . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Yet these days, processed synthetic foods are accepted more than natural food.

      Facts? Statistics? Or did you watch Soylent Green recently? & just who is it that does all this "accepting"?

      BTW, are there unprocessed synthetic foods?

    2. Re:Back in my day . . . by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's bring the modern "vine ripened" tomato into this discussion. That's about the most synthetic tasting blob of nylon.

    3. Re:Back in my day . . . by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Well it used to be Western cultures were less squeamish about eating all parts of the animal as well.

      We aren't really. In fact we're probably eat more parts of the animal than any other society in history. To further that end we have invented such techniques as air-blasted pig brains and mechanically recovered meat. If there's protein or fat in it, then someone will buy it and turn it into food.

      Basically anything that's far enough from a good cut now gets ground up and put into various products. On the bottom end you have that economy mince which consists of 80% soy mince and 20% mulched abbotoir sweepings.

      I've had cow cheek. It's quite nice, but fiddly. You can get it easily from a butcher if you're not in a hurry and don't want it on the day. Likewise things like lamb neck have a lot of flavour but need to be coocked for hours and are still a bit of a PITA even then.

      I still love a nice juicy steak. No hassle. No bones, no connective bits, just nice hunks of easy to eat, delicious meat. I could really use a steak right now in fact.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Back in my day . . . by ozydingo · · Score: 1

      Well it used to be Western cultures were less squeamish about eating all parts of the animal as well.

      We aren't really. In fact we're probably eat more parts of the animal than any other society in history.

      That we eat it doesn't mean we're not squeamish about it. Go ahead and ask the guests at your next cookout how they like the pig-brain-stuffed hot dogs you're serving and see the reactions you get. I still know far too many people who insist on not seeing any part of a cut of meat that makes it look like it came from an animal.

    5. Re:Back in my day . . . by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      Well it used to be Western cultures were less squeamish about eating all parts of the animal as well.

      I'm not so sure about that... had a hotdog recently? All the parts are just prepared differently these days, which folks tend to forget about, even if purposely. "Haha yeah, hotdogs have pig anuses... pass the mustard!"

    6. Re:Back in my day . . . by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Back in high school, I'd bring beef tongue sandwiches for lunch. They were delicious but not very socially accepted. There were plenty of taunts from my more juvenile peers regarding consuming a cow's tongue.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:Back in my day . . . by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Where in the world do you get your hot dogs? The ones I buy come from trimmings not anuses unless you're buying mystery meat hot dogs out of some guy's truck.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:Back in my day . . . by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I would bet you one million dollars that more Cheetos are consumed than beef tongue in the US.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    9. Re:Back in my day . . . by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      Well, the last bit was meant for illustration purposes only - how folks realize there are "squeamish" things in there, but tend to laugh it off rather than actually being squeamish about it. Some folks, anyway.

    10. Re:Back in my day . . . by Pikewake · · Score: 1

      Pigs cheek is still considered a delicacy. I have eaten it at several great restaurants, including two with Michelin stars.

  22. What's Stopping Us From Not Eating Any Creatures? by vovick · · Score: 1

    Nothing, apart from whimsical craving for tasty food. At least for the civilized countries where pretty much anyone has enough money and supplies to switch to a veg{an,etarian} diet.

  23. How the sausage is made by mfwitten · · Score: 1

    "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." - Otto von Bismarck

    Look, life is disgusting. There's a reason why "How the sausage is made" refers to anything that should be hidden away.

    The only reason people eat sausage and beef and pork and poultry and sushi and other animal innards, etc., is because some trained sociopath has already taken on the burden of turning something repulsive into something delicious.

    Package those insects up as cheap, tasty patties for the summer BBQ, ramp up the marketing campaign about gettin' to enjoy a Burger while also savin' the planet AND your money at the same time, and get Burger King to sell the [grass]Hopper in place of the Whopper.

    Then, in 50 years, we'll be eatin' insects as though we've always been eatin' insects.

    1. Re:How the sausage is made by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are deluded, there is nothing sociopathic about killing and preparing an animal's flesh for a meal. Mankind and his predecessors have been hunting, preparing and cooking animals for over a million years. It's natural.

      Humans also have eaten certain insects, most of us have eaten some of the aquatic kinds of insects. But most prefer fish, livestock, poultry, amphibians. Eating one is no more evil or wrong than eating the other.

    2. Re:How the sausage is made by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Then, in 50 years, we'll be eatin' insects as though we've always been eatin' insects.

      FTFY: "Then, in 50 days, we'll be eatin' insects as though we've always been eatin' insects."

      In modern world, just as fast as people forget things, they can also quickly adapt to new ones.

    3. Re:How the sausage is made by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the problem runs deeper than that.. Humans evolved to forage for plantlife and hunt large game, and throughout that time, insects were pests, often distributing plagues, destroying foodstores, and, in general made life miserable. Seeing a big crushed spider underneath that bun is going to turn just about anyone off far more viscerally than watching a documentary on sausages. Also, anyone who is allergic to shellfish should probably avoid land based insects too.

      Sure, some cultures eat insects, but it's usually a VERY short list, and these behaviors are the exceptions that evolved because there was low negative reenforcement when the behavior was tried (ie disease, deadly anaphylactic reaction etc).

      Why is it that green types insist that people live like 3rd worlders do? It's such a heavily romanticized view of the lifestyle. Trust me, it fucking sucks having to live in the desert and eat insects in order to survive. The prevalence of this attitude makes me wonder if it's due to some propaganda meant to get people used to living in shit.

    4. Re:How the sausage is made by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      I think you are off the mark about trained sociopath, but you overall point is correct: it's all about the packaging. Well, and the name. Give the new food stock insects a sexy name (they do it with fish all the time) and bam! Everyone will want some.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:How the sausage is made by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's natural.

      "It's natural" is one of the worst non-arguments there is. Flinging poop is natural. Many parasites are far, far more disgusting and entrely natural. There are plenty of natural things which are beyond disgusting and whose behaviour we wouldn't want to replicate in a remotely civilised society.

      There is much that we do that isn't natural, living in shelter, eating cooked food, wearing clothes, arguing on the internet and I for one am very glad of it.

      most of us have eaten some of the aquatic kinds of insects

      I doubt that very much. Perhaps you are talking about crustaceans? Crabs are about as close to insects as cows are to sea squirts.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:How the sausage is made by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Killing to feed your family is different psychologically then just killing.. People who kill hundreds of animals per day either develop psychological problems or already have them.
      and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macdonald_triad

    7. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are deluded, there is nothing sociopathic about killing and preparing an animal's flesh for a meal. Mankind and his predecessors have been hunting, preparing and cooking animals for over a million years. It's natural.

      For sure. First of all sociopath is entirely the wrong word. Secondly, the people with a mental problem, in this case cognitive discord are the ones eating animals without understanding and appreciating where that food comes from. Many cultures have rituals to prevent this from happening, but it's a common form of craziness in the US to know nothing about a food source.

    8. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that green types insist that people live like 3rd worlders do? It's such a heavily romanticized view of the lifestyle. Trust me, it fucking sucks having to live in the desert and eat insects in order to survive. The prevalence of this attitude makes me wonder if it's due to some propaganda meant to get people used to living in shit.

      It's a "we'd like everyone living today to have the same standard of living... what's the population of the world? ... okay, how many resources do we need for that? ... uh... okay, things may need to change a bit..." line of reasoning.

    9. Re:How the sausage is made by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 2

      He is not arguing its not disgusting. He is arguing it isn't sociopathic. You would need to provide plenty of links in order to convice me that vegans show more emphathy, are better behaved, and more socially engadged than meat eaters. Also plants are disgusting... because they taste worse than meat.

    10. Re:How the sausage is made by chuckinator · · Score: 1

      Bugger patties?

    11. Re:How the sausage is made by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      let's define "Natural" as behavior over the time period of a species, the species being humans. Flinging poop? not normal behavior. Internet, no, not done for most of mankind's existence. But shelter, clothing, cooking meat, yes.

      Insects are just crustaceans that went to land, by many recent arguments.

    12. Re:How the sausage is made by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You linked to an article that calls your claim a myth.

    13. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of us have eaten some of the aquatic kinds of insects

      Who is this "most of us" group? Crustacea and insectea are not the same phylum.

    14. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's true, but presumably, when people talk about what is and is not "natural," they're talking about what life forms other than humans do, or something along those lines. I've never really understood it and never understood why it matters at all what other creatures do, but there it is.

    15. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's define "Natural" as behavior over the time period of a species, the species being humans.

      That doesn't really change anything. I'm not saying that the actions being talked about are sociopathic, but talking about what is and isn't "natural," common, or tradition aren't really good arguments, in my opinion. For instance, even if lots of people believed that 1 + 1 = 3, that wouldn't mean that it isn't absolutely idiotic.

    16. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's natural" is one of the worst non-arguments there is. Flinging poop is natural.

      Well, you're British, so that goes without saying.

    17. Re:How the sausage is made by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You would need to provide plenty of links

      Why? He was arguing it was *natural*. That's a crappy argument.

      How you got from that to some rant about vegans is beyond me.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    18. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are deluded, there is nothing sociopathic about killing and preparing an animal's flesh for a meal. Mankind and his predecessors have been hunting, preparing and cooking animals for over a million years. It's natural.

      Humans also have eaten certain insects, most of us have eaten some of the aquatic kinds of insects. But most prefer fish, livestock, poultry, amphibians. Eating one is no more evil or wrong than eating the other.

      Im sorry, but you cannot use logic or reason with a vegan.

      You are truly wasting your time.

    19. Re:How the sausage is made by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      You are deluded, there is nothing sociopathic about killing and preparing an animal's flesh for a meal....Eating one is no more evil or wrong than eating the other.

      Hannibal Lecter was saying the same thing over dinner at his house. Not quite sure what he meant by it...

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    20. Re:How the sausage is made by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      True, honest to God sociopaths have no empathy, this is true. And a lot of them grow up torturing animals. But a lot of perfectly empathic, well-adjusted kids and adults can hunt, kill, and dress animals without compunction or any real harm. You may get an empathic response if you see a deer wheezing on its side suffering (in fact, I would be worried if you *didn't*) but in that case you put a mercy kill shot in its head and carry on with dressing it. The trick and the major difference is hunting for the joy of inflicting pain (sociopath) and hunting for food where the object is to kill the animal as quickly and painlessly as possible to harvest its meat (not sociopath). I promise you if plants screamed when they were killed you would get over this kick pretty quickly because you still have to eat.

    21. Re:How the sausage is made by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It all depends on why you do it. If you kill because you like to see animals suffer, then yes, something is very wrong. If you kill as efficiently and painlessly as possible in order to harvest the meat (either for your family or for others) then it's fine and shouldn't cause psychological damage. Specifically, the MacDonald Triad refers to *animal cruelty* which is basically torturing animals for fun. If you try and twist this to cover a man killing cows in a slaughterhouse which are then taken and eaten, I think you've reached too far with it.

    22. Re:How the sausage is made by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      but normal people believe 1+1 = 2

      and they eat meat

      so your argument fails

    23. Re:How the sausage is made by pckone · · Score: 1

      Crabs are about as close to insects as cows are to sea squirts.

      Really? Your idea of 'about' seems to vary from my own quite a bit.

    24. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugger patties?

      Phrasing!

      I don't want any part of patties which come about as a consequence of buggery...

      - T

    25. Re:How the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm certainly not judging (I still live a lifestyle that benefits from the abuse of animals and occasionally even eat meat), but consideran article a few days(?) ago discussed the "empathy switch" psychopathic criminals may supposedly possess that allows them to switch off moral inhibitions.

      We're quite capable of developing bonds with animals, especially cute ones. How is it that much different that we're able to switch off any thought of the atrocities committed upon these conscious, (but of course arguably less intelligent) beings? I should imagine other animals that have evolved to possess emotional drives/responses suffer a great deal. Putting what is "natural" aside how is eating a thinking animal that much different to a cognitively disabled person? Obviously we can't stop everything from dying, but it's a sad thought for any part of the universe to become a conscious entity only to be snuffed out before it can witness more of itself and its surroundings. This birth of thought out of matter is a very beautiful phenomenon, and while for a great deal of the world it seems incredibly counter-productive/inconvenient to live a more vegan lifestyle, I in turn think it merits more thought in the lifestyle choices we make as omniverous/carnivorous diets become more personal choice/habit than necessity.

      And if we don't begin to entertain these values, what is to become of us when we create/encounter some form of hyper-intelligent life? Would that give it/them the right to abuse us like cattle on the grounds that we are less cognitively able?

      Perhaps consider the recent declaration of dolphins as non-human persons in India; should at the very least be thought-provoking.

      -Marshmelloh

  24. how the sausage is made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's stopping us is that everybody assumes that you have to eat something that still looks like an insect. Nobody (okay, almost nobody) would eat beef if it still looked like a cow. Insect protein paste just needs to be coagulated into some kind of inSPAMsect loaf, add some salt, seasoning, and a dab of HFCS, and you've got a million dollar industry.

    You could even add a little red food coloring, just to remind everybody that we're already eating bugs, since carmine, cochineal extract, and natural red 4 are all made from bugs.

  25. Health Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many can carry bacteria, parasitic worms, and other pathogens as well as causing allergic reactions.

    1. Re:Health Reasons by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      So can pork, chicken, eggs etc. if not prepared properly, no-ones saying you eat raw uncooked bugs... and as for allergies... well there are enough food allergies out there already... Just ask anyone with a peanut allergy. I myself am allergic to potatos, corn and chocolate, (so sayeth the allergist, of course potato and corn are RAW potato and corn... cooked is just fine.)

    2. Re:Health Reasons by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      So can pork, chicken, eggs etc. if not prepared properly, no-ones saying you eat raw uncooked bugs... and as for allergies... well there are enough food allergies out there already... Just ask anyone with a peanut allergy. I myself am allergic to potatos, corn and chocolate, (so sayeth the allergist, of course potato and corn are RAW potato and corn... cooked is just fine.)

      I know how to prepare pork, chicken, eggs, etc. I know what a typical 'diseased' animal looks like. thousands of years of domestication has generally given us a good idea for the types of parasites/bacteria we might encounter and how to either kill it or avoid them.

      I have no clue how to tell if a grasshopper is carrying a parasite/bacteria. I suppose I could heat the hell out of it, but that's not going to lead to tasty food. Have we identified a sufficient number of potentially lethal bacteria/parasites which exist in native insect populations of areas where insects are not normally consumed by humans?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  26. Don't forget about pesticides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A certain school tragedy in India comes to mind (yes, I know, unwashed vegetables... but how are we to know that today's pot o' insect brew was not made from the exterminator's cleaned out roach motels?)

    Also, fresh organically grown insects just doesn't have that certain ring to it.

  27. Perception. by intermodal · · Score: 1

    You constantly hear about the problems with insects and arachnids. Ticks carry lyme disease. Mosquitoes carry West Nile. Bees sting but honey is delicious. Wasps. Hornets. Plagues of locusts. Poisonous spiders and scorpion venom. Fictitious depictions of flesh-eating scarabs (actually a type of dung beetle).

    It's a matter of perception.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Perception. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swine Flu
      Avian Flu
      Mad Cow Disease

    2. Re:Perception. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      True, but it's much more efficient to inspect each cow, pig, or chicken than it is the thousands upon thousands of insects it would take to equal one cow's worth of food.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Perception. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You mean the swine flu that was easy enough for the Mexicans to contain by simply killing off livestock? When your animals are large, slow, and not capable of flight, it makes them a hell of a lot easier to contain.

      The same goes for mad cow.

      Even avian flu is more likely to be spread by humans than a bunch of chickens flying off into countryside to contaminate all of their wild friends.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Perception. by cusco · · Score: 1

      No, the chickens don't spread it from place to place, the pigeons that come to eat the chicken food do. We had most of our chickens die one time because we were letting pigeons eat the chicken food (my nephew would kill a couple from time to time with a slingshot for Sunday dinner). Disease killed all but one of the chickens, so we never made that mistake again.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  28. Profits, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still profitable to make and sell meat

    It has not been shown that selling insects is profitable (especially if you factor in the cost of marketing to change public perception)

    The TFA makes faulty analysis in order to push its own liberal pro-insect agenda. For example:

    "In the West African country of Mali, it was common for children to forage for grasshoppers among the crops grown by their families. Their diets consist of millet, sorghum, maize, peanuts and some fish, so grasshoppers were an important source of protein (Looy 2013). However, when their families began to grow surplus crops and make use of pesticides, parents began to actively discourage their children from eating grasshoppers, which means that theyâ(TM)re now short of an important protein option."

    How dare these African families grow surplus crops! How dare they overproduce and make a profit, and earn savings which they can then use to buy meat without having their own children toil away foraging. How dare they be capitalist and improve their own standard of living!

    1. Re:Profits, duh by cusco · · Score: 1

      Stupid libertardian. The kids can't eat the grasshoppers because of the pesticides. They don't grow enough surplus to purchase meat regularly.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    2. Re:Profits, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid illiterate, read my post again. Where did I mention buying meat "regularly"?

      Really, who in their right mind would assume that people in poor people in development countries would get anything "regularly"? Your point is completely detached from reality.

  29. *Sigh*... Are you implying... by gwolf · · Score: 1

    That us Mexicans are not a Western culture?

    Yes, when I receive toursits here, a mandatory stop is at the local butcher store, to see the hanging pig head (from which delicious although extremely fatty food is made). And yes, some even agree to have "chapulines" (grasshoppers) sold in the market nearby.

    Yummy :-)

    1. Re:*Sigh*... Are you implying... by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

      Yep, go find an Italian family pretty much anywhere in the world and you'll find every possible part of the pig turned into something damned tasty.

      I suspect that when the OP said "Western" he meant "American." Every other Western country has its own food that is made from some generally gross part of the animal. The Englishman has his black pudding, the Scot his haggis, the Welshman his faggots, the Frenchman his frogs and snails. The Germans have handkase, the Finns rotted shark, the Swedes fermented herring. I could go on.

      I suspect the objection to insects is that we think of them as things we find in our drawers or crawling up our walls. You don't just pick something off the wall and eat it. Cows live on farms and we eat them. Beatles live in shit and we don't eat them. Your average insect also smells vile when you squash it - why would you eat something that smells like that?

      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    2. Re:*Sigh*... Are you implying... by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      Beatles live in shit and we don't eat them.

      That is incorrect. The Beatles lived in Liverpool.

    3. Re:*Sigh*... Are you implying... by gwolf · · Score: 1

      In a shitty suburb of Liverpool, perhaps? Or is all of Liverpool shit?

      Do insects migrate to tastier shit once they have the means to, as the four of them did?

    4. Re:*Sigh*... Are you implying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to American sausages, I suppose, where only the finest cuts of the meat are ground.

      BRB eating pork rinds, pig's feet, and chitlins

  30. Size problem? by oxnyx · · Score: 1

    The Royal Ontario Museum a number of years ago did a poster (think normal movie poster from HMV etc) with all the insects on it life size and the tag line "Bug Your Parents take you to the ROM" I got a free copy as being part of a camp run by the Museum. Very very few of the bugs on that poster were even as large as a chicken wing.Then there would be the reducing to shell them. I believe for most of the first world there would be a huge cost to grow them in the winter to meet standards of livestock and keep things cleans and that nothing about controlling the populations from breaking out. Even in the "Banana Belt" of Southern Canada we only get 1 crop a year of most things...I not interested in risking it.

    --
    Life is like untied shoe laces; it always tripping you up and getting in your way.
    1. Re:Size problem? by Hentes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. The same reason we don't eat pigeons or rodents anymore, it's just too much work to cook them for that little meat. And those animals are still giants compared to insects.

    2. Re:Size problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't shell or prepare insects, you throw a handful in a frying pan with some spices and thats it. If you go to a lot of South-East Asian countries you'll find insects being sold everywhere because they're so easy to farm and cook. For the record most of them are very nice snacks, though probably not something you would want to make a whole meal out of.

    3. Re:Size problem? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      That's all good and well if you like crunchy things. If you don't, then you're stuck eating larvae or not eating them at all.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    4. Re:Size problem? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      Really? So how do you explain squab and rabbit being on many menus in most metro cities in the US.
      Sure, squab and rabbit is not as common as New York Steak or Lamb Chops, but it's not exactly a rarity.
      I can tell you I see a lot more squab than I see mutton or venison.

    5. Re:Size problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you go to a restaurant, someone else does all the work.

    6. Re:Size problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet we still eat those tiny salad shrimp by the handful.

    7. Re:Size problem? by bjackson1 · · Score: 1

      In France, eating pigeon is quite normal from what I saw when I visited. I had pigeon prepared three or four times in the two weeks I was in Paris, and it was delicious every time. If I recall, pigeon was brought to the US from Europe (as it is not indigenous here) as a gourmet food.

      As to why we don't eat it now, my guess would be shifting demographics, but I do not know for sure.

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Animal rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to accidentally eat an insect that trespasses on your farm and eats your food, another thing to hunt down and kill an insect who never did anything to you.

    1. Re:Animal rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any animals rights activist who drives or rides in motor vehicles is a complete hypocrite - the front grill is evidence of mass murder.

  33. Or they choke you to death: by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 2

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/bug-eater-choked-death-article-1.1208649

    Which actually is an interesting problem. Bug legs are notoriously small, stiff and designed to stick to things... precisely the opposite of what you want going down your throat. Not insurmountable... as with bones in chickens it's going to come down to preparation (boneless) and making good choices (don't eat chicken bones).

    And I don't know how I feel yet about getting wings stuck between my teeth like popcorn kernels.

    But, you know... tradeoffs. ;-)

  34. Because people are dumb and ignorant of the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They eat burgers quite happily, tell them it was from some slaughtered animal, "eww gross". Deal with it, it was an animal, stop being 4 years old.
    EVEN CHICKENS. DESPITE THEM BEING WHOLE.

    But really, if we want these morons of society to eat insect food, the only way you are going to do it is if you make insect patties, sausages and the like.
    Insect sprinkles, sauces, jams, stuff like that too.

    Once that is stuck in their head, maybe then things like insect breeders, insect-on-a-stick sweets and the countless other things will become more popular.

  35. What's stopping us from eating rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For centuries there has been a fuckton of research to erradicate certain diseases from certain animals such as cows, chicken and pig and make them safe for us to eat. There are guidelines and there is quality control. These animals have been carefully breaded in order get where we are today and to provide a good yield in volume and nutrients for us. Moreover, we are used to eating them, their taste is pleaseant to us.

    There is more to life than just surviving.

    1. Re:What's stopping us from eating rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These animals have been carefully breaded in order get where we are today and to provide a good yield in volume and nutrients for us.

      I don't see how breading helps to provide good yield. Sure, it provides a crunchy covering when you fried them, but that's all.

  36. It's been tried by DougOtto · · Score: 1

    Starbucks was nearly crucified for using a natural red coloring in their strawberry fraps.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    1. Re:It's been tried by Holi · · Score: 1

      What you mean Red Dye #4?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:It's been tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid PETA.
      But some people are allergic to cochineal extract...

  37. and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are useful by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Part of it is in our heads. Also, we eat mammals, not creepy-crawlies, because mammals aren't poisonous. Meat (mammals, birds) is also highly concentrated food.
    Insect shells, legs, etc. aren't as good for food, and they are far more likely to be poisonous. Some bugs are poisonous themselves. Others, like flies, hang out in rotting meat which is full of bacteria and toxins. So we evolved to not eat bugs because bugs are likely to make us sick.

    Of course, fungus is similar. Mushrooms are an acquired taste, not something that most people enjoy immediately, but with modern practices we can separate the edible fungus from the poisonous. We eat some edible fungus and smoke one of the poisonous ones. :)

    Cats and dogs aren't "all in our heads", we have them for a reason, and that reason isn't food. Evolutionarily speaking, it's better to let your cat keep the rats away than to eat the cat. "Don't eat your friends" is a good idea, not just a cultural convention.

  38. We already eat insects by garyok · · Score: 1

    Cochineal. That lovely red colour.

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
  39. Maybe evolution? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Many insects carry disease and extremely toxic venom, so it would make sense that humans learned to avoid them. The fact that most people prefer not to have them around their homes and in their food might suggest how prevalent this is. A large subset of the population also has an instinctive fear reaction to their presence, which I'll bet is genetic. Many are also allergic to their bites, feces, and even their discarded shells.

    1. Re:Maybe evolution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely not genetic. Every parent I've ever talked to with a normal child had a story about the kid eating a bug they found or caught somewhere. Just yesterday my 13 month old son was found munching on a flying ant, and we found a largish intact bug leg that he had already passed in his diaper a couple weeks ago. Anything that might fit in his mouth he'll attempt to eat at least once, if it moves and tries to escape he loves it that much more.

  40. I have tried insects before by BurningTyger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I ate insects during a special event at Insectarium in Montreal. I have to say, people do not eat insect because it simply does not taste good.

    There are three problem with insects. First is the exoskeleton. With shrimp and lobster. The shells can be easily removed. Not so with grasshopper. The stir fried grasshopper with heavy sauce can mask its insecty taste, but it still feel like eating little shrimps with shells on.

    The second problem is the texture. Of the insects I had, none has the chewy texture people associate with "meat". Beef/pork/chicken, or shrimp/lobster/octopus, or fish, has chewy texture. With insects, it does not. For example, I tried silk worm. No exoskeleton. But when you bite into it, its body burst gooey stuff in your mouth.

    Third is the taste. People naturally like cooked meat. Without any seasoning, most cooked meat and seafood taste great on their own. With insects, there's something about their taste that is off-putting to human and require proper seasoning to mask it.

    1. Re:I have tried insects before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have tried chapulines, the Mexican grasshoppers. They're actually quite good as a condiment (very salty) but too strong by themselves.

    2. Re:I have tried insects before by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Yup agree with you that the whole thing bits of crunchy exoskeleton stuck in your teeth is annoying. I've had fried insects as a snack in Thailand and the taste was fine but the texture similar was like eating shrimp shells and then getting popcorn kernels stuck in your teeth.

    3. Re:I have tried insects before by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you pretty much nailed it here. With bigger animals like cows and even shrimp you can separate the meat from the shell, with insects you can't. Insect exoskeletons also frequently come with spiny legs, thoraxes, etc, not the most pleasant things to have in your mouth or try to swallow.

      Supposedly roasting insects and grubs makes the interiors firmer and less gooey. As far as taste goes it is telling that advocates always (for instances) promote chili powder covered or chocolate dipped insects. Even they can't handle eating bugs as they are.

      There is also the issue of disease and parasites. I'm not sure you can clean insect bodies off as thoroughly as you could, say, a lobster. With beef you are taking meat that hasn't been exposed to the environment unlike insect bodies. With insects you are also eating the contents of their digestive tracts.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:I have tried insects before by hey! · · Score: 2

      Like anything else, the gustatory qualities of an insect depend on how the insect is prepared. You wouldn't care for a raw shrimp, and you wouldn't care for a raw silkworm either. For that matter you probably wouldn't like raw chicken.

      Crunchy ants straight from the mound is a taste many people might never acquire, but it doesn't mean you can't use your culinary skills to transform them into something else. For example there are forest people in India who grind stinging ants into a paste and make it into a spicy chutney. You wouldn't know that you were eating insects if you weren't told. For that matter the crunch of a big ant might be just the thing in a confection where you'd otherwise use puffed rice.

      Then there is just getting used to the texture and the fact that you're eating bugs. I know people who are researchers who eat handsful of live crickets as a snack because they've got hundreds of pounds of them in their lab, and they like the crunchiness. A lot of people have exactly the same kind of difficulties you are reporting the first time they try raw shellfish, but once you get used to it there are few things tastier than a raw oyster on the half shell with a squeeze of lemon.

      Trust me, a raw oyster doesn't have the texture Americans associate with meat.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:I have tried insects before by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Some people claim insects taste like shrimp or lobster. Do you find that to be true, or was it a different taste?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:I have tried insects before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With insects you are also eating the contents of their digestive tracts.

      This!!!

    7. Re:I have tried insects before by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried them so can't comment myself, but assuming your opinion is shared with the majority of the population, it seems processing insects into a food additive, rather than consuming them directly, would be the way to go. It avoids the "ick" factor, hides the bad taste/texture, but preserves the nutritional value.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    8. Re:I have tried insects before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With beef you are taking meat that hasn't been exposed to the environment unlike insect bodies.

      Of course, the idea is to farm insects.

    9. Re:I have tried insects before by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

      Japanese eat raw shrimp (amaebi). There is also lobster sashimi. I love them all. I also love raw oyster. I am pretty adventurous in terms of food. That is the reason I went to that event to try insects.

      I get what you are saying. My point was that what people normally eat require only simple preparation (just cook it). That is why they are popular. With insects, they are like offal. They requires a lot more preparation or add lots of spices to make it tasty (liver pate, insect chtney). And some people still wouldn't eat offal.

      Unfortunately, none of the insects I tried at insectarium in Montreal many years ago was good. But that doesn't mean there aren't preparation method out there that would one day turn insects into delicacy. But until then, if someone like me who is pretty daring with food don't find them tasty, it is much harder to promote insects to the general public.

    10. Re:I have tried insects before by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

      Of the one I've tried (fried grasshopper, roasted silkworm, ant in chocolate, and various other i can't remember), none of them taste like shrimp or lobster.

    11. Re:I have tried insects before by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

      I found a great way to turn insects into a delicacy.

      Step 1: Grow lots of insects
      Step 2: Feed these insects to frog or fish
      Step 3: Eat the frog or fish

      Insectovres like ant-eater, shrew, or mole also works :D

    12. Re:I have tried insects before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'd be absolutely disgusted to know how many parasites--including worms--are in the fish you eat. There's a reason people rarely eat fresh water sushi, and it's not because they don't taste good raw (they do).

      All of your rationalizations are just cultural biases. They're not even sound rationalizations. Nobody eats insects as substitutes for a slab of steak. So to compare the the taste and texture is just ridiculous. That's like complaining that popcorn, broccoli, or gummy bears don't taste like a hot dog. No shit, Sherlock.

      And the reason "advocates" promote chocolate covered whatever is because people like you would be too grossed out otherwise. In societies that eat grasshoppers you don't drown them in chocolate or spices. You just roast them or fry them and season them like anything else.

      Just admit that you're grossed out, and stop rationalizing it. It's fine to be grossed out. I've eaten duck fetuses, fish guts, dog, guinea pig, horse, camel, grasshoppers, and a bunch of other stuff.. and liked it. But even I draw the line at eel or sea urchin, yet I don't feel the need to rationalize my tastes.

      Mongolians find fish disgusting. Their rivers are chock full of the some of the biggest and tastiest pike in the world. Go there and a Mongolian twin of yourself will have a litany of reasons why eating fish doesn't make sense. And like your reasons, they're stupid. They don't eat fish because they don't like fish. End of story.

    13. Re:I have tried insects before by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Sorry if you don't like my reasons but they are shared with many people. It is telling that as soon as they get meat like chicken or beef people who otherwise eat insects (and there aren't that many that do it with any regularity) immediately switch over. You seem to be taking this WAY too personally.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  41. Culture and society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are the words you had been loking for.

  42. Wrap them in bacon by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Lotsa bacon.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  43. 4 the US by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Since people in different places have different views as to what is disgusting different approaches are required. Insects might be turned into pellet like feed for chickens or for fish farms with good results. We do not have to directly ingest a resource.
                  However since we are over populated we could feed newborns to pythons. The skins could make lovely clothing or shoes and the meat from the pythons could be used to feed hogs or catfish or alligators. Human infants are clearly over abundant. Producing food while reducing population is the only way to go.

  44. Economics by tmosley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And so the economic decline of America continues. Just business as usual. Now we are here discussing eating insects because meat is too expensive.

    Yes, we don't insects because of purely cultural taboos. I personally will try anything once. But cultural taboos don't change because we think it they should, they change because they are forced to, either physically (like conquerors forcing natives to adopt their religion) or economically (countries sinking into abject poverty have to start eating insects because they can't afford conventional high quality protein).

    That aside, insects are neat in that they convert things like cardboard into high quality protein (ie you can feed cardboard to termites kept in a plastic box). The animals we have used for food in the past have usually either converted inedible biomass like grass or waste food (think pigs) into tasty protein. Insects broaden the potential input sources. Rather than having all that cardboard and presumably paper go to rot in a landfill, why not use it as a feedstock? Even if humans aren't the target, I'd bet it would work well in dog and cat food, or even cattle feed.

    1. Re:Economics by martas · · Score: 1

      And so the economic decline of America continues. Just business as usual. Now we are here discussing eating insects because meat is too expensive

      That's a bit disingenuous. There are serious sustainability and scalability issues with the usual livestock. It would be more accurate to say that this is not business as usual, because "business as usual" was when Western Europe and the US had a global monopoly on the good life.

    2. Re:Economics by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Dont be ridiculous; look at any economic standard, we continue to be top 10 in the world. Median income, GDP, GDP per capita, nil starvation levels, etc etc etc.

      We're discussing it because someone decided to stir the pot a little and claim that western culture is destroying the world by eating foods that have been eaten for thousands of years. And noone outside of this ridiculous article (LOTS of people eat insects, its just not culturally western) discusses this because its a stupid question. You cant just snap your fingers and change culture like that.

    3. Re:Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit disingenuous. There are serious sustainability and scalability issues with the usual livestock.

      True, but this wouldn't be a problem if we got rid of the asinine Judeo-Christianity leaning of the country. Be fruitful and multiply? Their god should've said, "Get a decent job and multiply when you can properly provide for a kid or two."

      Oh, you mean the other sort of livestock, don't you?

    4. Re:Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feed the cardboard to the termites, then feed the termites to anteaters or something. I wonder how anteater meat tastes? Or any animal that eats termites would work, really.

    5. Re:Economics by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      There are serious sustainability and scalability issues with the usual livestock.

      There is no sustainability problem. The only problem is scalability. Of course, every food source has a scalability problem. It is just a matter of how many people you pack on the planet before population out strips your ability to produce food.

    6. Re:Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? The claim their making is not a money issue but a production limit issue. They think we'll run out of supply, not money.

    7. Re:Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no sustainability problem.

      Of course there is. The world does not have infinite resources.

    8. Re:Economics by peon_a-z,A-Z,0-9$_+! · · Score: 1

      Posting to remove a inadvertent mod. Good point with the 'changing of a cultural taboo' point.

    9. Re:Economics by tmosley · · Score: 1

      So people being forced to eat insects because meat is too expensive is not a sign of economic decline?

      Meat doesn't have "scalability issues". Just a couple of years ago, everyone in the first world could afford meat. I guess that is still the case, it's just that the West has largely fallen from first world status.

    10. Re:Economics by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Who's we, kemosabe? 80% of Americans will face poverty in their lifetimes according to a new study.

      Lots of people eat insects, sure. But lots of people wipe their asses with their hands and drink foul water too.

    11. Re:Economics by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      "Rather than having all that cardboard and presumably paper go to rot in a landfill, why not use it as a feedstock?"

      cause its full of glue and easily recycled back into cardboard rather than a pest people spend billions of dollars on trying to rid themselves of?

    12. Re:Economics by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      There are serious sustainability and scalability issues with the usual livestock.

      There is no sustainability problem. The only problem is scalability. Of course, every food source has a scalability problem. It is just a matter of how many people you pack on the planet before population out strips your ability to produce food.

      So maybe instead of trying to get us to eat bugs, we should just let the hungry people die. If I can afford to buy beef and chicken, then that's what I will eat. If others can only afford bugs, then so be it. I can tell you that I will go vegan before going bugan.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    13. Re: Economics by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The thing is that going vegan won't solve the problem. It will only push off the problem for a little while. Then you have even more people starving.

    14. Re:Economics by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Yes, probably before they have jobs and their income levels are technically below the poverty line.

      Also, that number was 54%, not 80%, and it was one of the most laughable reports I've ever seen. 99% of americans will miss a meal at some point in their lives; that doesnt mean that we have a problem with starvation, and its a useless statistic without knowing when, why, and for how long.

  45. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, dupes on slashdot are making me lose my appetite for one... This is probably the third time I've seen this story come up.

  46. Two insect restaurants in LA by TheSync · · Score: 2

    In LA, you can eat insects at Typhoon in Santa Monica or La Guelaguetza.

  47. Sleep with your mouth open. by alfredo · · Score: 1

    I guarantee you will eat some fresh protein during the night.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
    1. Re:Sleep with your mouth open. by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2

      I guarantee you will eat some fresh protein during the night.

      What happens between you and your boyfriend at night is your business.

    2. Re:Sleep with your mouth open. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are watching too much pr0n.

    3. Re: Sleep with your mouth open. by alfredo · · Score: 1

      You naughty boy.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    4. Re: Sleep with your mouth open. by alfredo · · Score: 1

      How much is too much. I usually lose interest after a few minutes.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
  48. As a vegetarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I would like to say - this is rhetorical:
    Why Haven't We Stopped Eating Animals Yet?

    We don't need to kill and eat the animals that live with us on this planet. Some vegetarian meat substitutes taste pretty good nowadays and there's plenty of choice. Is not eating animals better for your health? Maybe. Some cardiovascular diseases and cancers are linked to eating certain kinds of meat. But who cares. It's selfish to eat dead animals, even if you killed them yourself. Animals are being treated like shit so we can keep eating them, and you know it. You know about factory farming. You know about the environmental benefits of not eating meat.

    1. Re:As a vegetarian... by dugancent · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Vegetarian here as well. I don't eat animals for ethical and environmental reasons, not for health reasons.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    2. Re:As a vegetarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of which make sense.

    3. Re:As a vegetarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of scientific evidence indicates that humans do better on diets that include oceanic fish.
      Humans can survive on pure vegetarian diets and perhaps thrive on a special vegetarian diet. But for now it's much easier to just add some fish to the diet.

      The big problem is the bycatch problem - such a sickeningly huge waste. And the fishing management/quota problem - where politics typically take precedence over science.

    4. Re:As a vegetarian... by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but as a vegetarian you're probably getting more insect protein in your diet than the omnivores are.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    5. Re:As a vegetarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's selfish to eat dead animals

      Living itself is selfish. All animal life exists at the expense of other living organisms.

    6. Re:As a vegetarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You know about factory farming. You know about the environmental benefits of not eating meat"

      Yup, we do. We eat them just to piss off you self righteous douche bags

    7. Re:As a vegetarian... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Your entire post is nothing but a pile of self-aggrandizing offal:

      http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/16/vegans-stomach-unpalatable-truth-quinoa

      http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/protein-full-story/

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2157221/Maybe-Prince-Charles-right-British-scientists-reveal-plants-really-talk.html

      I don't mind other people making the choice to become herbivores, but when you start shoving it down everyone else's throat, or talk shit because other people don't choose the lifestyle you've chosen, I tend to develop a nasty case of gofuckyourself.

      Get off that high horse, putz.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:As a vegetarian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly lives on a average or higher income in a developed country.

  49. Gag reflex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A nearly instant gag reflex from knowing that I'm trying to eat an insect? In all seriousness, I'm quite happy to feed these things to chickens instead of corn, and then eat the chicken. Problem solved. I understand most chickens love them. You can even get eggs if you don't like the idea of killing a live chicken.

    With the chicken, you can easily remove the feathers and guts which contain SHIT. With insects? With the small ones you're eating exoskeleton, bowels and SHIT. 'nuff said.

  50. PeTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will go all Jack Bauer on your ass if you think about it.

    1. Re:PeTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. PeTA members have no guns or significant muscle mass. They will go all butthurt on your ass.

  51. Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The meat in the store does not resemble the actual animal, but you expect me to eat a whole insect raw as it is? Just make it into a paste or something.

  52. Options open. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is stopping you from moving to china and start piling through tons of garbage on the sides of roads in search of edible garbage?

  53. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've started eating cricket power bars for hiking. Cricket flour has almost as much protein as beef, much less fat, and tastes great. For the environmentally inclined, consider that ten pounds of grain produces one pound of beef, three pounds of port, or eight pounds of crickets - while consuming virtually no water. Now if only I didn't keep my wife awake all night with the damn chirping...

  54. It's the legs by Skapare · · Score: 2

    They get between my teeth all the time. Cow and pig legs don't do that as much.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  55. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

    Never heard of smoking fungus. We do *eat* some poisonous varieties, though!

  56. Maybe... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

    Taste?

  57. Make them look like a steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, somebody in Japan was able to make juicy-looking steaks exclusively from human excrement. Surely the same can be done from insects?

  58. What billionaire invested in bug farming? by ebunga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously. This year has been a non-stop onslaught of "YOU WILL EAT BUGS". It's DeBeers diamonds all over again.

    Stop trying to manipulate me you shitbags. I'm eating a goddamned steak wrapped in bacon wrapped in a bigger steak, served between two pork chops. FOADIAF.

  59. Easy ... by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 2

    for the same reason I dont eat eg. small birds or mice, because I prefer not eating intestines (except liver)

  60. I'm reminded of that car commercial: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    him: you can tell you're eating a bug.

    her: because of the legs.

  61. Re:What's Stopping Us From Not Eating Any Creature by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Preachy bastard aren't you? To me, most vegetables taste extremely bitter. I have to coat them in crap, or overcook just to get them down without gagging. That kinda negates a lot of the nutritional value. I still do it because it helps digestion, but I doubt it's a net-win nutrition wise.

    How about you eat what you want to eat, and others will eat what they want to eat? Deal?

  62. Why not dogs and cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every year over 4 million cats and dogs are euthanized(in the USA alone), but we don't use the meat for sustenance. There's a lot of things we can eat, but that doesn't mean we actually eat all of them.

  63. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by ozydingo · · Score: 1

    Also, we eat mammals, not creepy-crawlies, because mammals aren't poisonous.

    How does the variety of toxic plants fit into this narrative? I don't see the process of learning what insects to eat as being any different from the process of learning what plants to eat. That other cultures do eat insects I think supports my point.

    Mushrooms are an acquired taste, not something that most people enjoy immediately, but with modern practices we can separate the edible fungus from the poisonous.

    Why do you say they are an acquired taste compared to anything else we eat? And, like insects and plants, far-less-than-modern practices led humans to separate the poisonous mushrooms from the edible ones.

  64. I'd Rather Eat Bugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Than be forced onto a diet of 'meat' made from soy and tofu. Seriously, you process the hell out of the protein and while it may not be as good as the real thing, IMO it'll be a lot better than some vegan crappadepoop.

  65. Taste, learned or genetic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I come from a society that considers sautéed grasshoppers a delicacy, but we find it disgusting that the people in a country about 1000 Kms. south of us eat sautéed caterpillars.
    My two older sons (14 and 11) enjoy the sautéed grasshoppers but the youngest (9) has never been convinced (his problem is the heads, if you remove the heads he eats them abundantly). I used to think it was a learned experience but now I think its part genetic.
    My youngest sister was born in a neighbouring country where they did not eat insects, and she grew (while we lived there) without tasting sautéed grasshoppers. The first time she ate them (when we went back home) she loved them so much she ate them as if addicted and ate so much she fell sick. Threw up much of the next day then started eating them again the third day but in moderation.
    So is it taste, learned or genetic?

  66. The taste. by Z00L00K · · Score: 0

    The taste would stop me.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  67. Simple answer by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

    I'd probably eat insects if I could actually buy them.
    Only very few specialty stores sell them and they're too expensive for anything but exclusive party snacks.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  68. Beetlejuice.... by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    Loves those cockroaches and fly's, it seems like fly's really are attracted to Zagnut bars.

  69. Indirect entomophagy by neromike · · Score: 1

    Bug eating doesn't have to be direct: http://www.pereanu.com/comic/entomophagy/

  70. You like your burgers... by alexborges · · Score: 1

    And I do too, dont get me wrong. They are good and it makes people fat and thats at least in some part, why your country are mine (Mexico) are on the brink of drowning due to the weight of our colective mass. However, we do eat insects, and they are fucking good. At least if you know how to cook them, and that we do. Three absolutely delicious dishes (that even americans would find good if they didnt know what they are), come to mind:

    - Gusanos de Maguey, they are lightly sauteed in corn oil and mild spices, served with avocado, obviously freshly hand-made tortillas, and a set of nice green tomato salsas. This are worms that grow in maguey, which is a cousin of the same plant we make tequila out off.... cool, huh?

    - Escamoles, absolutely delicious, id say this is the true caviar of insect dishes in mexico, and its expensive by the way. They are the eggs of a kind of ant and are sauteed in butter with parsely and very finely diced onions, maybe a very little bit of garlic. Also served with corn tortillas and very good salsa.

    - Chapulines are a snack. This are a kind of wild crickets (we dont go hunting for them behind your sink, obviously), and they are cooked on the comal, the thingie we use to bake tortillas on the kitchen fire (kind of a round, flat pan). When they are on the fire, we sprinkle salt, lime juice, powdered pepper and just toast them there until they are crunchy, munchy and delicious. A pack of those can last a long time outside of the fridge and are a spectacular snack if your camping and doing outdoor sports and that kind of thing.

    Now let me say that part of the eek factor of insects is that one imagines eating them raw. This is not how its done, people, you cook the suckers well, using good ingredients and you will never encounter any kind of eeky texture in your mouth. The texture in the case of the gusanos and the chapulines is much like a vegetable that has been toasted or sauteed, and the aroma is a bit tingy, yeah, but if the bugs are fresh, its combines very nice with the spices.

    Finaly, people, if you ever go to Queretaro or a very good mexican restaurant in LA (ive heard of a oaxacan one "La guelaguetza" and anotherone from queretaro), and you dont have escamoles, you are a stupid asshole that deserves to eat out of a bag your whole life. Escamoles are a fucking fois gras (without the gavage).

    Enjoy.

    --
    NO SIG
  71. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by kaliann · · Score: 2

    Depends on what you're feeding your beef, but a respectable feed conversion from grain is generally around 5:1. Higher conversion ratios are usually found when animals are grazing, owing to the lower nutrient density of forage versus concentrated energy foods like grain.

    But insects are remarkably efficient, particularly with regards to water!

    I'm pretty curious about that cricket flour now. :)

  72. Pushing the insect diet much? by YalithKBK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is like, the fourth article in as many months on slashdot about why we should use insects as a food source. Are they pushing this as a new diet fad or something?

  73. Don't forget marketing! by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 1

    You also need a catchy name. Rape Seed Oil doesn't sound as good as Canola Oil. Perhaps Nano-Lobster?

    You need a "hero" to be seen using it. New hot actress, athlete or the new "cool" guy. "Steve Jobs 2.0 says Nano-Lobster raised him from the dead, cured his cancer and asshole-ness. Says iPhones will have removable batteries and OS-X will be available on PCs."

    --
    Place nail here >+
  74. Excellent question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, what's stopping you, dear Scientific American authors? Just go for it, don't ask us!

    Bon appetit!

  75. Protein Bars by tekrat · · Score: 2

    We will eat insects soon enough in the USA. But it will be mashed to a pulp, processed and reprocessed into "food bars" so that we will not recognize it as eating bugs.

    McDonalds will be sure to include a lot of bug in it's "100% pure beef" hamburgers.

    With the rising cost of feed, and the rising cost of meat, fast food and processed food will gradually include more and more bug into their mixture that becomes whatever it is we're eating...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  76. Let me see... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Ohhhhh maybe that they're disease-prone, disgusting, universally despised creatures where anyone with a working brain has an aversion to them for genetic/survival reasons since some are dangerous. Also I doubt our digestive system can process the thick-walled cells that make up their shell.

  77. Lobster, crab, shrimp by structural_biologist · · Score: 1

    Lobster, crab, shrimp and other crustaceans are much more closely related (evolutionarily) to insects than to fish or other animals that we commonly eat. So in a way, many Americans are already eating insects.

    1. Re:Lobster, crab, shrimp by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Except, as others have pointed out, you rarely take a lobster or crab and eat it whole - shell and digestive system as well as meat. With an insect, there's no way to remove the shell, extract the meat, and just eat that part. You pop the entire insect in your mouth including the shell, legs, and digestive system (including any waste products that the insect didn't "dispose" of). Even if you could extract the meat, each insect is so small that the time spent pulling out the meat wouldn't be worth the amount of meat obtained.

      I'd be willing to bet on the future of meat being lab grown rather than bug-grown. (If it does indeed change significantly from the current system.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Lobster, crab, shrimp by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1
      Lots of people get sick from eating those things as well.

      Shellfish allergy is the most common food allergy for adults. Two percent of American adults have a shellfish allergy. 0.1 percent of children have a shellfish allergy.

      For people living in a time periord where there was no treatment for a severe allergic reaction these foods could be deadly. Serve a 100 people and 2 people get sick is enough for society to dicorage the practice.

  78. You are thinking of Soylent (no joke) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking the same thing. If they made such a product and it was well researched for effective nutrition, I would consider going on such a diet for a few months if it meant almost no prep and I could loose a bunch of fat weight.

    You and the other posters with this sentiment are asking for exactly this: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-06/how-i-survived-week-without-food they even had a kickstarter, do you mean you missed it? Boo: https://campaign.soylent.me/soylent-free-your-body

    It was really fun to watch all the reporters try the diet, and see how similar their stories were:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/22/soylent_diary_conclusion/
    http://gawker.com/we-drank-soylent-the-weird-food-of-the-future-510293401
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2013/06/10/a-week-without-real-food-i-survived-and-learned-to-enjoy-soylent/

  79. Beetle risotto by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    Funny, your mention of risotto made me recall a beetle risotto that I made and ate once.

    I'd made the risotto, and then I looked at the rice I made it from (there was some I hadn't used) and there were plenty of little beetles in it.

    I decided I was damned if I was going to let my neuroses force me to waste so much effort. So I ate it.

    Tasted fine. No ill effects.

    1. Re:Beetle risotto by cusco · · Score: 1

      When people tell me that we should be growing/eating only organic foods without pesticides I ask them if they've ever had to carve worms out of the potatoes, sift weevils out of the flour, and sort the moth larvae out of the rice. Of course they always say "No", so I tell them to go live in a region of a third world country where pesticides are not used and they will. To be truthful it doesn't bother me, except for the portion of the food that the critters ruin, but t makes them think about their blanket statements a little (my actual goal).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  80. Gross but... hey, it's a personal choice. by Dakiraun · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think it's disgusting on a whole new level to consume insects. Thing is though, food is very much like religion or your personal sense of style; culture and necessity can influence it to a degree, but ultimately it comes down to personal preference. If some people think this is a great idea... good for them; let them eat bugs. My only request (just like religion or fashion) is not to push it on me. I'll eat what -I- want, they can eat what -they- want.

  81. What's stopping us? by hey! · · Score: 1

    We're narrow-minded wimps.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  82. Honey and worms by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    We do use enormous amounts of honey and tons of insects inadvertently gets ground up in grain flour, not to mention the occasional half a worm in an apple...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  83. Because.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eating insects is disgusting and for third world countries that have no food.

    1. Re:Because.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eating insects is disgusting and for third world countries that have no food.

      There is plenty of food to go around. For every single man, woman and child on this earth.
      The problem is not food supply but food distribution. So how about we force insect diet on those bastards that control food distribution eh ? It might fix the problem after all.
      When I think the EU and the US of A pay farmers NOT TO GROW food it just defies any rational/moral/ethical justification. And the EU even went as far as to destroy crops because it would cost too much money to distribute it to the poor countries. See how fucked up the world is ? And it is not because we can't produce enough food. So the insect diet for everybody can wait, at least until I'm dead. After I won't care if the world goes up in flames.

  84. Re:What's Stopping Us From Not Eating Any Creature by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    Where are you getting your vegetables? The reason I ask is that there are a lot of vegetables where the standard stuff in the grocery store is a bit nasty, but fresh from a healthy plant has a sweet flavor. For example, if you eat a fresh green bean, and it's not slightly sweet, that's not a good bean.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  85. Process those babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I know processed food is baaaad, but it's also what we're used to and it's pleasantly anonymous. If somebody made a nice reasonably-priced chocolate-flavored protein bar with a pretty wrapper and a cute name, and it tasted good, and oh yeah it just happened to have ants as the first ingredient, then not only would we start eating bugs, we'd also start getting used to the idea. A few months later, people would start asking Whole Foods to stock whole ants, and they'd be posting recipes on pinterest, and Bob's your uncle.

  86. Parasites by Freddybear · · Score: 2

    It's never as simple as "Just grow some bugs and chow down". Most species of insects are hosts to assorted parasites.
    For instance, the common grasshopper (yummy when fried) can carry tapeworms.

    While we have lots of experience dealing with parasites of domestic mammals, not so much for bugs that live on other bugs.

    1. Re:Parasites by Greg01851 · · Score: 1

      Proper cooking will eliminate worry of parasites (think pork and trichinosis... just cook it well and no worries).

    2. Re:Parasites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's never as simple as "Just grow some bugs and chow down". Most species of insects are hosts to assorted parasites.
      For instance, the common grasshopper (yummy when fried) can carry tapeworms.

      While we have lots of experience dealing with parasites of domestic mammals, not so much for bugs that live on other bugs.

      Sounds like a good solution to the obesity epidemic. Carrying a parasite is also an allergy cure, which is too common a problem in today's society.

      It should be an option. Do you want your crickets with worms or without?

  87. Re:Meal replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://soylent.me/

    A recent startup with at least a fairly comprehensive base of ingredients, supposed to be an all-in-one food replacement (though I would probably only replace a meal or two per day, as I'm sure there are still things missing). I believe they are confident in shipping by september. I put in a preorder to at least sample it; it would certainly be convenient. The founders original goal was to make it a very cheap staple food, though we'll see if success corrupts....

  88. What is stopping us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same reason we aren't eating feces. I mean feces can be eaten. Lots of animals do it. Why not add them to a diet, too?

  89. Presentation by Kookus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Process it like a hamburger or a hotdog and there will be a lot less resistance.

  90. The advocates are telling by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    When something is truly tasty, it is generally good plain. That doesn't mean you only eat it plain, that seasoning isn't awesome, but that it isn't needed to be good.

    I love a good steak with no sauce at all. Raw salmon is great as is (though I do like it with soy sauce better). Chicken is a little bland when cooked with nothing, but no problem and actually needs very little (bit of oil and garlic) to make it quite good. Etc.

    Same deal with fruits and veggies. Carrots, tomatoes, apples, peaches, bananas, etc, etc all great just as they are. Peel, if applicable, and eat. There are some other great ways to use and prepare them, but they are all tasty just as they are.

    When someone tells you that something is really great, but then it needs to be masked with something pretty strong, well that should give you pause. It probably isn't in fact that tasty, and they are just trying to cover it up. It is rather disingenuous.

    1. Re:The advocates are telling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in cow and chicken the skin, intestines and bones are removed. At insect level, you still eat the insides or need a lot of time to remove it.

  91. Let them Eat Cock- by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    roaches.

    Let's just ignore that in nearly every famine we've had a food surplus, and tell the peasants to eat bugs.

    I thought it was well established that in, "Let them eat cake.", the cake is a lie...

  92. Cricket eating human. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dhn7PWEhdw

  93. Blame that bigoted Chaldean as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider that up to the end of WW2, Abrahamic religions and cultures affected by Abrahamic religions held sway over a significant fraction of humanity. Now that any sort of appeal to a Transcendent Moral Ethic has been dismissed as bigoted, people have been more willing to eat things listed as no-no's in the Five Books of Moses.

    --
    Another fine opinion from The Fucking Psychopath®.

  94. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by Threni · · Score: 1

    > Part of it is in our heads. Also, we eat mammals, not creepy-crawlies, because mammals aren't
    > poisonous. Meat (mammals, birds) is also highly concentrated food.

    But we DO eat creepy crawlies, if by we you mean `humans`, as the OP stated. The other arguments about poison are pretty weak. It's trivial to only eat the non-poisonous ones, as is done with mushrooms, fish, plants etc. And your last "argument" about cats and dogs is pure nonsense.

  95. Because we never learned to by houghi · · Score: 2

    Just like some people never learned to eat vegetables or meat or fish. This all without ever trying it.

    Let us look at something relatively: Fresh fries. In Belgium and The Netherlands, you eat them with mayonnaise. In the UK with vinegar. Ask either to try the other and you will get an initial look of terror on their face.

    And why do they dislike the other so much? Because we have never learned to eat it.

    Also eating is social. So if you try to do something too awkward, you will most likely not be asked to host the next dinner. This means the majority will not do that.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Because we never learned to by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Mayonnaise and vinegar on fries both sound really good and I'd like to try them both. Insects sound disgusting. Bad analogy.

  96. asses, balls, hoofs, horns, and hides by r00t · · Score: 1

    I'd love to eat insects if you stop implying that I have to eat the horrible parts. I also don't want processed "meat" like hot dogs. Find a way to butcher insects properly, and I'll gladly wolf them down.

    For example, I can imagine a machine (sort of a robot) that gets the meat out of grasshoppers. First it yanks off the back legs; the rest goes to compost. Second it snips off the leg joints, keeping only the big thigh section. Third it uses a blunt metal probe to push the meat out of the exoskeleton. The result is tasty little bits of meat that can be sold like burger. Probably I'd make tacos with it.

  97. You first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead, nobody is stopping any of you proponents.

  98. What's stopping us from eating insects? TWO WORDS: by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    Gag reflex.

  99. Maggot farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have been doing this for decades. I remember when I first thought up the idea of farming maggots for chicken feed. Something had died and three days later there was a pile of maggots under it when I moved it. The chickens LOVED them. They were fighting over the maggots. I thought I had come up with a revolutionary new idea. I had lots of extra chicken guts, and could grow maggots for free and they would be a low cost nutritious feed for my chickens.

    Then I went out on the internet and not only had someone else already thought of the idea, they had perfecter their maggot grower and were marketing it. My epiphany was that no matter what gross idea I came up with, if it was effective or efficient or useful, not only had someone else already thought of it, but they were already making money from it.

    The problem is that while these growing pods are ingenius, especially with their method of harvesting the grown maggots, they also stink. One guy had pictures of his entire evolution of growing pods. The first ones stank so badly there was a gap in the video while he went and barfed. There are ways of mitigating the stink, but it's still a problem.

    Well, this new one from the Austrian lady is designed for human consumption. If people are going to grow their own maggots and eat them, there's going to have to be a way to grow them without the smell. Maybe she has it figured out. Maybe the idea of being a maggot farmer isn't as far-fetched as I had thought.

  100. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > How does the variety of toxic plants fit into this narrative? I don't see the process of learning what insects to eat
    > as being any different from the process of learning what plants to eat.

    The poisonous parts tend to be the leaves, not the fruit. Humans, and primates generally, don't often graze on random leaves.
    We eat the sweet fruit, which is designed to be be eaten. Tomato stems and leaves are poisonous, the fruit is delicious.
    The poisonous part is not delicious. Beans are a notable exception to this general rule.

    > far-less-than-modern practices [wikipedia.org] led humans to separate the poisonous mushrooms from the edible ones

    From your wikipedia link:

    The first reliable evidence of mushroom consumption dates to several hundred years BC in China.
    The Chinese value mushrooms for MEDICINAL PROPERTIES

    If you're familiar with the medicinal properties of 'shrooms, you may recognize the 'medicinal' ones ARE the poisonous ones - they cause hallucinations. Anyway, it's a general rule - we eat a lot more fruit than fungus.

    > Why do you say they are an acquired taste compared to anything else we eat?

    Our taste buds are:
    Salty: meat
    sweet: fruit, including "vegetable" fruits like cucumber
    sour: fruit
    bitter: danger
    maybe umami (glutamate, MSG)

    Mushrooms are neither sweet, nor salty, nor slightly sour. Those are hallmarks of "food". Fruits and some vegetables are sweet and a bit sour, meat is salty. Things that don't fit the taste profile of either fruits or meats are not pleasant when most people first try them. We can learn to enjoy them, however, and beer is a great example. Give young child mushrooms or bleu cheese and see what happens - they haven't learned the taste, so they only enjoy the naturally attractive flavors.

    Umami (glutamate) is debated as to whether it's a basic taste, but it does seem that IN COMBINATION WITH other food flavors, it can enhance those other flavors and make them more delicious. Mushrooms are full of glutamates, they are nature's MSG. Perhaps that's why we eat mushrooms and not other fungus, and why we normally put mushrooms on top of some base food, like meat. Putting mushrooms on a steak is the same compounds as putting MSG on it - it amplifies the steak taste.

  101. surely a robot can do the job by r00t · · Score: 1

    With an insect, there's no way to remove the shell, extract the meat, and just eat that part.

    This is my sole reason for rejecting insects. I think we could build a robot to solve the problem of picking out the meat.

    1. Re:surely a robot can do the job by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt that, even with robotic labor, you could get something useful out of insects. A quick Google search showed that an adult Morman Cricket (a large to pick an insect at random) is around 0.11 oz. Let's say that 50% of that is "meat" (this is probably being optimistic) and that a properly developed cricket robot can strip a cricket into cricket meat in half a second. This means each robot would be able to produce 0.11 oz of meat per second. It would take a robot about 2.5 minutes to produce a pound of meat. You could have many robots working at the same time, but you'd need a LOT of them to get to commercial scale. And while the crickets themselves would be cheap, the robots would be expensive.

      I think lab grown meat (of the cow, chicken, pig variety) has more of a future than insect meat does.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:surely a robot can do the job by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      D'oh, I started to edit my post and then got distracted. (Squirrel! I mean, cricket!)

      "an adult Morman Cricket (a large to pick an insect at random)"

      should have read

      "an adult Morman Cricket (to pick a large insect at random)"

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  102. how old, where from? Heard of marijuana? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I'm curious where you're from and how old you are that you haven't heard of smoking 'shrooms.
    In Texas it's almost as well known as smoking marijuana.

    1. Re:how old, where from? Heard of marijuana? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I'm British, and hadn't heard of smoking 'shrooms. I understand people simply eat "magic mushrooms" though I'm not certain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_mushrooms

      What's the kind of mushroom that's smoked in Texas?

    2. Re:how old, where from? Heard of marijuana? by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      I'm from the US and am plenty old to know that high heat destroys psilocybin. People don't smoke mushrooms, my man. Maybe kids try it, but quickly learn that it is a waste of time. And marijuana and shrooms are vastly different. Sorry pal.

  103. Insects good source of vitamins, not food by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Insects are a good source to refine vitamins and other nutrients.
    That doesn't mean we should eat them. What we should do is just eat the raw nutrients once they've been extracted from insects.

  104. Cheesy response by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    I didn't like it at first, but it grew on me.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  105. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we aren't a 3rd world country and have REAL food here. We don't need to choice between eating insects and starving. Stupid granolas.

  106. eat them for ethical reasons by r00t · · Score: 1

    If there isn't a market for meat, then those animals will never even get a chance to live. They simply won't be needed. It's like you're killing them before conception. Meat eaters at least give the animals life, allowing them to be born and usually even grow up. The animals get the best years of their lives, humanely euthanized before facing the suffering of old age.

  107. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Part of it is in our heads. Also, we eat mammals, not creepy-crawlies, because mammals aren't poisonous. Meat (mammals, birds) is also highly concentrated food.
    Insect shells, legs, etc. aren't as good for food, and they are far more likely to be poisonous. Some bugs are poisonous themselves. Others, like flies, hang out in rotting meat which is full of bacteria and toxins. So we evolved to not eat bugs because bugs are likely to make us sick.

    Of course, fungus is similar. Mushrooms are an acquired taste, not something that most people enjoy immediately, but with modern practices we can separate the edible fungus from the poisonous. We eat some edible fungus and smoke one of the poisonous ones. :)

    Cats and dogs aren't "all in our heads", we have them for a reason, and that reason isn't food. Evolutionarily speaking, it's better to let your cat keep the rats away than to eat the cat. "Don't eat your friends" is a good idea, not just a cultural convention.

    I was amazed to be taught in college biology that chitin (insect "bone" material) is found in mushrooms.

    The reasons I don't want insect on my plate is that per-pound, bugs have more spiky bits and often emit revolting odors. Grubs are less likely to offend, but I prefer my meat to have no identifiable body parts in it and be quite thoroughly dead. That eliminates a lot of non-insect meat as well.

    Then again, if I actually had to kill for meat, I'd be vegetarian. Except maybe geese. Nasty ill-tempered little bastards.

  108. Re:What's Stopping Us From Not Eating Any Creature by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

    Its not so much that cooking negates the nutritional value. Rather, it leeches some of the vitamins and minerals out of the vegetables and into the cooking medium. If you cook the vegetables and don't drain away the water, you'll retain most of the vitamins. And even if you do, you'll still retain the bulk of the nutrients in the plant.

    Myself, I prefer to eat my veges pre-processed by a cow. No, not cud. Steak!

  109. What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects? by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    What's Stopping Us From Eating Insects?

    I'll tell you: beef, lamb, chicken, turkey, pork, fish, milk, cheese, fruits, vegetables, grains, even air. If all of these run out, then I'll consider eating insects. But I have the feeling they'll eat me first.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  110. I don't know why she swallowed the fly... by barlevg · · Score: 1

    ...perhaps she'll die?

  111. so separate the meat by r00t · · Score: 1

    I think you CAN separate the meat. Look, slashdot just ran a story on a robot that would draw blood. There was also one with a robot folding towels and many with robots driving cars. Machine vision has reached a point where I'm pretty sure you could use it to pick out the meat.

  112. Colony Collapse Disorder by bigmiken · · Score: 1

    There it is; the answer all those Biologists have been missing, someone is eating all those bees.

  113. So process them first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Americans consume food that has been pre-processed to the point that it no longer resembles anything close to its original form.

    Most people would be grossed out if they actually saw how chicken nuggets are made.

    If you want people to eat insects, mash them up, fry them, and sell them for cheaper than a salad.

  114. What's stopping us from eating insects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's stopping us from eating insects? The fact that it is gross and disgusting.

    next question?

  115. do not confuse animals with humans by r00t · · Score: 1

    If you get them mixed up, then your treatment of animals is related to your treatment of humans. This applies to both good people and evil people. For example, it you make you join PETA if you don't like killing. You'd see nothing wrong with PETA's idea that killing a rat is like killing a child.

    If you can keep humans separate in your mind, as you ought to, then killing animals is no big deal. It can neither horrify nor satisfy an evil urge. It's kind of boring actually.

  116. We already eat insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. and large ones too. What are lobsters and crabs?

  117. Land *something* by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Well, one big difference is that you're not generally expected to *eat the shell* on shellfish. Most insects are just way to small to peel effectively, and most are not built in a way that make it easy, like shrimp are.

    Besides, I have it on good authority that most bugs have a "nuttier" flavor than a "seafood" flavor. Some are said to taste kind of bacony. Some are pretty tart, like ants with their formic acid. Some have fruit flavors, like the water bug. Crickets are supposed to be kind of metallic tasting. Insects and arthropods are a very diverse branch of the tree of life and taste different as larvae and adults. Assuming that all bugs taste similarly is kind of like saying that all mammals taste like beef or all birds/lizards taste like chicken.

    Of course, I've never had any myself, so I'm just passing around internet rumors too. I'd very much like to correct that, but I'm too intimidated by the possibility of cooking it "wrong" and giving myself a false bad impression. I've been Googling places that might serve insects in the city I live in, but no successes so far (other than overwrought, negative reviews for places with bad hygiene).

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  118. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by ozydingo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The poisonous parts tend to be the leaves, not the fruit.

    My understanding is that there are plenty of poisonous fruits / berries, many in the same family as human-cultivated varieties that we now eat. But I don't really know the distribution. Also, not all poisonous leaves taste bad or bitter (e.g. hemlock), but I do believe those are the exception to the rule.

    Humans, and primates generally, don't often graze on random leaves.

    Well, I don't know about gorillas, but humans have plenty of leaves in our diet and they had to have gotten there somehow--lots of trial and error, I'm guessing. Why can't the same be applied toward creepy crawlies? (Again, I'm guessing it did, given the prevalnce of bugs in some cuisines.) So I don't see "there are some poisonous ones" as being a unique feature. Maybe there are more poisonous / unsanitary bugs overall so that made it not worth the effort? Maybe there are more look-alikes that made it harder to catalog (though if you've ever tried to use a mushroom key that factor doesn't seem to have dissuaded us either).

    From your wikipedia link: The first reliable evidence of mushroom consumption dates to several hundred years BC in China. The Chinese value mushrooms for MEDICINAL PROPERTIES

    Also from the link (the following two sentences in fact): "Ancient Romans and Greeks, particularly the upper classes, used mushrooms for culinary purposes. Food tasters were employed by Roman Emperors to ensure that mushrooms were safe to eat." There's nothing modern about eating mushrooms, we can just learn a lot more about the toxins with modern techniques.

    Mushrooms are neither sweet, nor salty, nor slightly sour. Those are hallmarks of "food".

    I just don't know why that necessarily means it's an acquired taste. Why is umami, whether in its own right or in combination, not equivalently "naturally attractive" as any other taste sensation? Glutemate is found in meats and veggies too. Conversely, plenty of things may not be perceived as pleasant upon first try; a hypothesis I've read regarding this is that kids have higher sensitivity to different tastes so many common foods for adults are overwhelming and therefore somewhat aversive (e.g., here but that's just a random link I found on this topic). I just don't see where you're basing some of your statements from.

    Umami (glutamate) is debated as to whether it's a basic taste

    I thought it was pretty accepted at this point that it was a basic taste in its own right. Wikipedia points to several references claiming so at least. Maybe it doesn't elicit a specific perceptual response on its own (I don't know), is that what you mean?

    Lastly, non-mushroom fungus we eat includes blue-cheese cultures and cuitlacoche

  119. Buy them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why buy them when you can pick 'm of any and all plant outside for free. There is no shortage of bugs.

  120. Different molds on different foods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rule of Thumb that I've been thought: (A bit of) mold on fruit or cheese is fine to eat. Mold on bread is not.

  121. Found a dead beetle yesterday by Sla$hPot · · Score: 1

    It was lying on the floor dried out. Next to it was a bunch of small dried out parasite worms that had tried to escape the dead body.
    I couldn't help thinking of Marcel Dicke's TED presentation on using insects as a food product.
    Then i thought..Noo.

  122. They eat them in cambodia by buttfuckinpimpnugget · · Score: 0

    And they much prefer pig or goat or fish. When my brother was there they used crickets and other smaller bugs as fried snacks. Their staples were rice, shit tons of vegetables and the best meat they could hunt, raise, or catch...

  123. Re:What's Stopping Us From Not Eating Any Creature by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Someone posted this elsewhere, but it seems an appropriate response considering the 'holier-than-thou' tone of your post.

    tl;dr summary - you veg{ans, etarians} are just as responsible for fucking up the environment as we omnivores, moreso in some ways. Take your high-and-mighty attitude and blow it out your quinoa-shooter.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  124. FDA Regulations by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    The FDA strictly regulates the amount of insect parts in food. In order to eat insects, that limit would have to be raised to 100%. Have you ever tried to get a government administration to change a regulation? So, yeah, it's "big government stopping us from eating bugs!" Maybe next year I'll run on a tea-party "we should be allowed to eat bugs if we want to" campaign!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  125. Stopping us? by TimO_Florida · · Score: 1

    Guess no one watches Andrew Zimmern's "Bizarre Foods" on the Travel Channel. He eats bugs all the time. I myself got my fill back when I used to ride motorcycles...

  126. The way I see it, by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    this is a trial balloon for a society where our leaders continue to eat grass fed beef, and the rest of us survive on grasshoppers. And it'll be marketed to us in such a way that it'll seem like a good idea. Well, to most of us.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  127. Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Informative

    Parent may have been clueless to the tongue-in-cheek nature of my post but whoever modded this down was nonetheless a fucking moron; it's well understood that the flesh of nearly-completely-carnivorous creatures (such as felines) is highly toxic and can kill you if you eat it.

    Not really. Salmon, tuna, and swordfish are completely carnivorous and are eaten worldwide. Alligators and snakes are eaten in various parts of the US and are carnivorous. Indigenous Arctic peoples ate diets drawn primarily from seals (all carnivorous) and whales (many of which are carnivorous). Squids and octopi are carnivores.

    Now, that said, carnivore meat does carry some risks, all in the form of bioaccumulation of toxic materials. (e.g. Mercury and other heavy metals, PCBs, etc.) But "highly toxic" is a bit over-dramatic. You can eat a serving of carnivorous fish once a week and be fine. You can also eat far more than that and survive, but you may run into health risks or, more importantly, pass on unsafe levels that will affect your child's development if you get pregnant. Adults only risk death if those kinds of fish are your primary protein source and/or you get them from an actively polluted area. (See, e.g. Minama disease.)

    But the meat *itself* is fine, in absence of human-cause problems.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      (See, e.g. Minama disease.)

      That's Minamata disease. Sorry for the typo -- I got distracted in the middle of writing this.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      All valid points but I wasn't referring to the flesh of fish (carnivorous or otherwise), which is dramatically different than that of a purely-carnivorous mammal such as a big cat.

    3. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whales and seals, which I mentioned, are mammals and not fish. Lion meat is also sold and eaten (though not without controversy over its conservation status). Polar bear meat is eaten by Arctic indigenous peoples as well, and it's only the liver that's toxic due to its extreme vitamin A content (seal and whale liver is a-okay).

      Black bears are a bit more omnivorous but are also eaten by peoples around the world, including in Japan. Dogs are also eaten in various parts of the world, though their diets as food animals can vary wildly from the standard "mostly carnivore" model.

      And to the specific subject at hand, domestic cat meat has been eaten widely across the world. I have found absolutely no references to it being toxic.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuna and swordfish are extremely high in mercury. Unless you want heavy metal poisoning, I'd stay away from them too.

    5. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Whales and seals, which I mentioned, are mammals and not fish.

      Yes, however none of them feed exclusively on mammals.

      ...though their diets as food animals can vary wildly from the standard "mostly carnivore" model.

      As do the diets of domestic felines... :)

    6. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by ThreeKelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes, however none of them feed exclusively on mammals.

      Neither do cats. They'll eat anything they can catch including, but not limited to, fish, birds, rodents, and insects.

    7. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Seriously give a proper reference. There is nothing that suggests that an only mammal diet would make the consumer more toxic to eat. Their physiology is just not different enough. What bioaccumulation is specific to just mammals that is neutralized by eating some non mammal food? It does not make any logical sense.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    8. Re:Carnivore meat is not inherently toxic. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Yes, however none of them feed exclusively on mammals.

      Lions do, and people can eat them just fine. And since when was this a component of your spurious claim of carnivore toxicity? Will you just admit that you were making an unsupported claim, will you provide some sort of citation backing up this "well-known fact," or are you just going to keep trying to shift the goalposts in an increasingly illogical and desperate attempt to avoid admitting that you were wrong.

      As do the diets of domestic felines... :)

      Cats are obligate carnivores. Unlike dogs, they can't survive on a vegetarian diet -- at least not without severe processing of vegetable matter to get the nutrients they need and eliminate the components they can't digest. Vegan cat food exists, but it's by no means their natural diet. Nor is it representative of what cats raised for meat are fed, since it's the kind of thing only a Westerner would worry themselves with.

      But, more importantly, don't you see that that torpedoes your own freaking argument!?

      You) Cat meat, as a carnivore meat is well-known to be toxic.
      Me) Carnivore meat isn't inherently toxic. He're a long list of carnivores people eat.
      You) Well, I wasn't talking about fish.
      Me) I wasn't exclusively either. Here's some more mammalian carnivores people eat -- and some mostly carnivorous omnivores too, including dogs.
      You) Well, cats are kind of like dogs, that way.
      Me) *Head explodes*

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  128. Same reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same reason we don't eat algae cakes. Doesn't matter how easy or efficient they are to produce, if the public either doesn't like the taste or doesn't like the idea, forget it.

  129. Maybe for peasants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I enjoy eating real meat. You peasants can eat insects.

  130. taste? gag reflex? culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insects are already a part of some cuisines. Personally, you can have my insects. fill yer boots, mate.

  131. Alternative solution by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    What is stopping us from having too many kids, so resources are not strained??

  132. Horse meat is legal in the US. But... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Yes, but in the US it is _illegal_ LOL... we are so weird. Naturally, we are still allowed to sell them for slaughter. Because, you know, it doesn't matter that the horse is eaten, just that it cannot be eaten HERE.

    As a matter of federal law, the consumption of horse meat is legal. It's also legal to grow horses for meat consumption and to export them for slaughter (e.g. to Mexico & Canada) and then re-import the meat for consumption. It's also technically legal to slaughter them for consumption, but only if the USDA inspects the slaughtering facility for this purpose, and the USDA has not allocated any money to horse-butchering operations since a rider in budget bills explicitly banned them from doing so from 2007-2011. That pretty much killed the industry here, though some are looking to start it back.

    Now, several states do ban horsemeat production and/or consumption, and much of that came about because of terrible abuses in the industry, such as the infamous Beltex plant in Texas, and concerns over the use of horse drugs not safe for human consumption commonly used in old race horses.

    Personally, I'm allergic to horse hair and thus never developed an enchanted love for the beasts that so many others suffer from, which is probably why my opinion of horses and horsemeat tracks pretty well with The Oatmeal's.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  133. Simple... Ick factor by Greg01851 · · Score: 1

    Most/all of us in the US are brought up to think insects and similar animals are "icky and gross" No wonder we wouldn't want to eat them.

  134. It is not all in the head. by aepervius · · Score: 2

    It is also in the taste. I have tried pretty much everything from snail to frogs (cue to joke here folk) to cricket like (rosted on BBQ, or with honey) various species of big spider (marine and terrestrial) eggs from spider, sea arthropodes and I pass over many other options. The plain fact is that while I don't care for teh appearance (except spider) the taste were bland to not good at all for most of those. There were a few exceptions (the cricket in honey, but I would wagger the honey was the part I liked....). I don't think fighting any perceived disgust will change I disliked that stuff. Just like I am still disliking bruxel sprout, and quasi all alcohol except apple cider (at 2%).

    You know that people eat it for the protein does not mean it taste good. And so far since tehre does not seem to be a food shortage here around, I would like to spend the few years I have left eating good stuff.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:It is not all in the head. by westlake · · Score: 1

      You know that people eat it for the protein does not mean it taste good.

      The outdoor writer Patrick McManus had this to say about the terminology used in books published for those given to fads like stalking wild plants:

      Edible does not mean "good to eat." Choice does not mean choice. Edible means only that you won't flop over with face in the plate when you take a bite of the stuff.

  135. What's stopping us from eating insects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're yucky!

  136. Well, simple. by azav · · Score: 1

    The fact that they are disgusting.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  137. Cats? I've been eating pussy by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    for YEARS.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  138. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    it's better to let your cat keep the rats away than to eat the cat

    The last mouse I've seen was 30 years ago. Until I got a cat, that is: he brought home three this month already.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  139. Where are the recipes? by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    I think one of the big hurdles to eating insects is a clean food supply.
    Currently you can't just go to a shop and buy crickets for instance, and the ones in your basement are probably not sanitary.

    Also, where are the recipes? How do you cook ants? How do you cook crickets? What parts are okay to eat, and what parts are just chitin?

    I don't know enough about how to cook them, nor do I know what to cook them with.
    It is not that we don't have the stomach for it, it's simply a matter of how to cook them and how to make them tasty.

    I remember back in the 80s when escargot was considered disgusting, and when people would talk about eating sushi and others would interject 'but won't that make you sick?' the same with steak tartare. People get over the gross factor if they can try it and it's tasty, but they need to have a source that is readily available for them to jump on the bandwagon.

  140. Check out the big brain on brad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why expend all the energy on having a large brain, if it is not at least be clever enough to get you a good steak.

  141. Right in front of us all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "encROACHment"

  142. Nothing? by jon3k · · Score: 1

    We already eat insects.

    1. Re:Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crustaceans are NOT insects.

  143. See he caught mice you didn't even know you had ;) by raymorris · · Score: 1

    See he caught mice you didn't even know you had ;)

  144. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Part of it is in our heads. Also, we eat mammals, not creepy-crawlies, because mammals aren't poisonous.

    This is incorrect. There are insects that carry disease, but generally most insects are less risky for us to eat -- just think of swine flu, bird flu, mad cow disease, salmonella. We do eat prawns, crabs, etc -- these are pretty much 'sea insects' (and are not considered food in many cultures).

    Meat (mammals, birds) is also highly concentrated food.

    By weight, insects have much more protein (up to 75%).

  145. Gross looking has little to do with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever see a live shrimp? Or a lobster? Or crayfish? Oysters? Crabs? Ever actually -prepared- an eel and cooked it? It's a tough, slimy job and the chunks keep trying to wriggle out of the pan. Horseshoe crabs are a delicacy in several parts of the world, though only the roe is eaten. Bird's nest soup is a delicacy -- and it's also dried bird spit harvested from nests, once all the dead baby bird bits and feathers and poop is cleaned off. Honey is bee vomit. Several european cultures enjoy land-snails, and more cultures enjoy whelks and conch. Several types of ants -- the kind that store nectar in the abdomens of specialized workers -- are enjoyed like candy. You want 'gross'? Lutefisk and ... whatever the greenlanders call what they make out of that terrible, toxic greenland shark. Ever seen a sea cucumber? Lots of peoples eat those things.

    'Gross' is a cultural thing, as evinced by the many cultures around the world who will gleefully dig in to a plate of fried locusts, or those burger patties made from the -- lacewings, I think? -- that swarm around Lake Victoria. Palm grubs are a traditional delicacy. And I hear that cicadas are actually quite tasty.

  146. Louisiana Dividing Line by Dareth · · Score: 1

    There is a dividing line in the state of Louisiana around the "ankle of the boot". People north of the line eat stew, while people south of the line eat gumbo.

    Oh, and goulash is any dish you make then add corn to "make it better". *cringe*

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  147. Adequate cooking eliminates parasites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really much of a worry if you cook 'em thoroughly. Freezing will also destroy most parasites.

  148. mammals are safer by stenvar · · Score: 1

    Grazing mammals are probably the safest meat you can eat: fewest diseases, lowest accumulation of toxins and heavy metals, no intrinsic toxicity. Both insects and carnivores are far more susceptible to these problems.

  149. cheeseburgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they taste like cheese burgers, I'm all in ...

  150. NOTHING by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

    Americans unwittingly eat a pound of bugs a year, so the question is moot.

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  151. And Tomato Sauce and Rice by reluctantjoiner · · Score: 1

    As above, you can't just remove the top layer plus a little more and be safe. By the time you've spotted the mold, the toxin (Botulinum) has already spread throughout the sauce. And then there's the spores, which you can't see and which can travel a considerable distance from the initial colony.

  152. We already do but efficiency by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    We already do eat insects but they are not terribly efficient to raise. It is far easier to put cattle, pigs and poultry out on pasture, all of which can thrive on just pasture without any need for grain, high energy inputs like factory farms or laboratories. Pasture raised livestock have been perfected over a period of many thousands of years. They efficiently convert sunshine captured by plants into high quality lipids (fat) & protein (meat). They also concentrate vitamins and minerals.

    Don't confuse the modern factory farm, the CAFO, with pasture based livestock. CAFOs are what it would look like if Big Ag were raising insects. The only benefit of insects is they're not as cute so they don't trigger the emotional reaction from hyper-empathic people. Fortunately hyper-empathy is a curable disease.

    If you want sustainable, buy meat from your local pasture based farmers.

  153. New book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1001 ways to Wok your cat. Sorry, bugs are out. Crabs and Lobsters are large underwater insects, thus off the menu.

  154. It's all in the preparation by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Fried Ants are the worst, hours later I'm still picking legs out out of my mouth.

    Chocolate covered Grasshoppers are just horrid, not the Grasshoppers but the Chocolate.

    Areas where flour isn't stored properly (Philippines, Azores, Viet Nam (for me)) small Beatles will get into it
    At first I'd pick them out; then just didn't care. Spread butter or gravy over the bread you never knew.

  155. Can we get an accountant up in this bitch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming ground beef costs around $5/pound retail and further assume that farmed cricket fillet would retail at $2/pound. (Has to be less due to the eww factor)

    I'm not sure what margins butchers operate at, so let's try for %50, making the wholesale cost approximately $1/pound.

    Rate of cricket fillet production/week: 960 pounds per robot per week (8 hours x 5 days / 150 seconds)
    With 100 robots, that's about $100k / week.
    Gross cash flow: $5000k / year
    Profit Margin: 10% (Based on a quick google search)
    Net cash: $500k year
    Required return: %30
    Maximum investment: $1700k

    So we can invest no more than $2 million to set up a factory of 100 robots, and staff. I'm no manufacturer nor accountant, but that seems ridiculously low.

    TL;DC - It's seems Jason is right :)

  156. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Does it actually taste great, or does it taste great in the same way that a "veggie burger" tastes great...

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  157. interesting, here the same are smoked by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That's interesting. Here, the same mushrooms are most often smoked. Maybe that's because weed, which is better smoked than eaten, is so popular here. Perhaps if people are accustomed to smoking stuff ...

    1. Re:interesting, here the same are smoked by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I thought I'd better check my facts -- they were correct, mushrooms are only eaten in Britain.

      See the supposedly-impartial government information site: http://www.talktofrank.com/drug/magic-mushrooms

      How do people take magic mushrooms?

      After picking, magic mushrooms are often eaten raw or are dried out and stored. Some people use the dried mushrooms to make tea. Most people take between 1-5 grams. People don’t tend to eat fly agaric mushrooms raw as they can make you feel really sick.

  158. Chicken or the egg situation by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    The blurb mentions it's easy to breed your own sterile and pathogen free insects. But the device isn't actually available for purchase. It's not easy, because there's no demand. There's no demand because it's not easy. If it was as simple as with the linked device I'd do it. But I won't devote the time needed for more difficult and less cost effective ways.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  159. Lack of supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get them to the stores, offer them as samples at the supermarket, publish recipes, show those recipes applied by a celebrity cooks, and most importantly, let Nigella on loose to make some prostitute's evening crickets!

  160. I once ate some ants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left a box of raisins out on the kitchen counter one evening. A while later as I was passing through the kitchen I picked it and took a few bites. I thought, what a nice vaguely peppery taste. Wait a minute. This doesn't taste the same as raisins.

    Then I turned on the lights.

  161. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought I'd drop an anecdote on the blue cheese thing:
    My wife is allergic to penicillin. This came up during a battery of tests at an allergist after we'd been married a few years. Previously I'd always given her a hard time about her hilarious childlike aversion to the smell of blue cheese and a few others that I happen to quite enjoy. When she smells it or it's offered to her she makes a ridiculous 'yuck' face and rather than simply saying 'no' like a normal woman in her mid-thirties, she responds by turning her head and making and exaggerated gagging sound. It's quite funny to watch.

    Anyway, the point is I'm pretty sure her ludicrous reaction to these cheeses is rooted in her body's response to them when she was younger because she's allergic to penicillium. Because regardless of what she says I refuse to entertain the idea that one of my favorite cheeses doesn't taste friggin' awesome.

  162. Protein resequencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need protein resequencer technology, such that we can take plant material (such as algea), and resequence it into any protein pattern to replicate any kind of meat, vegetable or fruit, in any kind of texture and any kind of taste. Maybe even invent whole new concepts, as we are no longer bound to what nature has constructed.

    Then we can stop killing things.

  163. Umm... by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    NEVER. GOING. TO. HAPPEN.

  164. pity the poor bees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jeez, the bees are in enough trouble already - and now they want us to start eating them...

  165. not so bad I think by r00t · · Score: 1

    Suppose we just go for the thigh meat. We cut off the joints, then push the meat out with a blunt metal probe. (should work on grasshoppers at least) Although this is more wasteful than a fancy fillet, the equipment would be way faster and cheaper.

    The result is also a chunk size suitable for burger. It doesn't need to be treated like pink slime. It need not be breaded and fried.

    1. Re:not so bad I think by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It might be easier, but how much thigh meat would the average grasshopper have? Even assuming you had 100% successful meat/shell separation every time (no shell bits getting in your meat and no meat clinging to the discarded shells), you'd need over a thousand crickets to make a pound of meat. Going by my last estimate of 0.055 oz of meat per cricket, getting just the thigh meat would probably get you something like a quarter of that. If not less. So we're talking 0.01375 oz of thigh meat per cricket. This is about 73 crickets for every ounce of meat.

      Perhaps our simplified cricket-meat-extraction-robots would be able to process 10 crickets per second (probably a high estimate). This means it would take a cricket robot 7 seconds to make an ounce of cricket meat or nearly two minutes for a pound of cricket meat. Getting a group of robots could wind up producing more meat quicker, but it would get expensive quickly.

      Cricket meat would still likely wind up costing more than an equivalent amount of beef, poultry, or pork. Given that more accepted meats are both widely available and (relatively) inexpensive, the "ewww" factor of insect meat is worse than a solution in search of a problem. It's a solution that nobody wants for a problem that doesn't exist. Even if you were to remove all meat products (including all seafood) from the supermarket shelves, I think most consumers would go vegetarian before they went insectivore.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  166. I've eaten a slug by dsfadsfgafgf · · Score: 1

    I've ate a Slug by mistake once. it was *uck*&^% grotesque in the extreme. with or without an exoskeleton the reason we don't eat insects has less to do with culture and more to do with taste. If the French have yet to find culinary wonder in the myriad of insect life that surrounds us then no one will.

  167. Because McDonalds hasn't invented.... by tomboalogo · · Score: 1

    the Bacon Cheese McBug wrap in a Happy Meal with a Hoppy The Grasshopper toy.

  168. Point and Obligatory sg by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, the Western predilection for certain sources of sustenance becomes a moot point in about 7 days. Since our young love every nutrient they Get, remember each & every nutrient.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  169. Not easy to grow. by niftymitch · · Score: 1
    I would assert that they are not easy to grow.

    It takes a social infrastructure to "grow" insects. Their food needs to be harvested and stored. Then the insects need to be caged and contained. Building a bug proof anything is darn hard if you toss your resources back a couple thousand years.

    Further healthy bugs and unsanitary bugs are not mutually exclusive.

    Infestations of bugs in food stores are just down right nasty. Bug poo is still poo. Bug guts are full of stuff that our gut does not like. This alone may be the root of our social prohibitions to some degree.

    Today however we can spin steel into screen. We can freeze food to kill many insects and insect eggs. We can put the dead bugs in a low to zero oxygen bubble to kill them.

    It may be that modern technology will put solar food energy much closer to our ever increasing and all consuming wants and needs. In the case where vegetable material is low on protein bugs that eat is may be rich enough to justify high temp frying in oil to sanitize the buggers.

    And BTW, Lobsters were considered bugs and bad food because it was poor people food.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  170. Re:and a) mammals aren't poisonous b) cats are use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be careful in saying that humans eat this, humans eat that and making generalizations from a standard US diet.

  171. It's the poop. by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    I've choked down some mealworms and crickets. Live and cooked. The biggest barrier between me and enjoying it, is the fact that I'm eating their digestive systems. I'm eating their poop. There's just no avoiding eating poop if you're eating bugs.

    --
    ...
  172. Insects are Haram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note that 23% of the worlds population are Muslim, and insects are not Halal. This is good reason for lack of adoption as well. Its not just the west that wont eat them.

  173. mostly by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    the fact that they don't sell it at the cornerstore or supermarket for cheap dumping prices or maybe better elitist exotic prices with a little hype anything goed down, even caviar ... (which probably tastes like someone ejaculating in your mouth as someone once told me hah hah hah)

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  174. Gee! i dunno... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    This is a tough one. What indeed? i can't figure it out...

  175. What indeed stops us? by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... Does anybody have an answer? Tough one, isn't it?