God forbid that you ever owe for being a member of society.
Being a member of society is not the same as involuntary servitude (13th Amendment). Got it. YOU MUST PAY to belong! So much for free association (1st Amendment).
This is why socialists suck. They have no clue how they enslave a society.
Re:Hammerheads in Vermont
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 1
You painted yourself there. Your words not mine.
I didn't miss the rest of the point. Someone who doesn't understand that Socialism is redistribution of wealth doesn't deserve any further consideration. And I explained why in my reply
Re:Can you put a lid on the mysogonistic crap?
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 1
It is funny how liberals are all for protecting certain "women" from "Microagressions" from the GOP, but dish out the most vile comments when it suits them. Would they call Hillary half the names they've called Hillary?
Just let that sink in. For you Bernie supporters, Bernie got 60% of the vote and 13 delegates, Hillary got 38% and got 15 delegates out of NH.
Hillary knows she cannot lose, because she has already grabbed all the Super Delegates the DNC machine has in place to thwart people like Sanders. All she needs to do is win enough delegates to augment her sizable lead in SuperDelegate count and walk in the Convention without actually needing to win anything.
Mark my word, Hillary is going to be the DNC nominee, even if there is FBI request for indictment.
And you think you have a choice.
Re:She had no chance, but still...
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Lose to Bernie? Bernie is not electable. Lose to Hillary? Hillary can't even win the DNC primaries fair. Though I don't put it past her to tie up all the super delegates and win enough others to trump (pun intended) Bernies delegates, and get the nomination. Which would keep all the Bernie fans home in Nov, or worse, going to one of the Socialist/Communist party candidates.
Re:And there was much rejoicing!
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
To be honest, the choices for the D candidates is even more pathetic. You have a confirmed liar and a socialist nutjob who hasn't run anything. I'm not liking where our country is headed.
Re:Hammerheads in Vermont
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 0
government wealth redistribution
This alone makes you socialist/communist.
As a Libertarian, I oppose the Min Wage. As a realist, I know you cannot repeal it. But as jobs disappear because Robots take over for humans (http://www.businessinsider.com/momentum-machines-burger-robot-2014-8 ) Min wage will become a non-issue.
The problem is, Government shouldn't pick winners and losers in the marketplace. If something is "too big to fail" it is too big. Period.
Re:And there was much rejoicing!
on
Carly Is Out
·
· Score: 1
False Dichotomy choices D/R prevail, and continue to be foisted upon us by people trapped in a system they cannot see to escape from.
Every Single one of the D and R candidates would be disastrous for the citizens of the USA.
These are "facts", and the "speculation" from the "Global Warming" nuts is also clearly documented. Here are a few good articles on exaggerated claims that never panned out:
The people saying "global warming" are all paid to say "global warming" to get/keep Government funding, so that government can dictate to everyone (except rich n powerful) that we need to give up every technology that makes the world run.
The fact is, ever number has been fudged to get the results they are wanting, to prove what they need to prove, to keep getting funding to support something that has no basis except "consensus"
When every major prediction has failed, the the consensus cannot be right. I remember all those predictions of "worse hurricanes" followed by "almost no hurricanes", and "Polar Ice caps disappearing" only to have "polar Ice caps expanding (which is now the new "proof" of global warming), on down the line.
not to mention the Greening of Africa, when it was supposed to be getting drier and more desert like: http://news.nationalgeographic...
The problem isn't Global warming, it is that EVERYTHING is blamed on it. Ice growing or shrinking.. GLOBAL WARMING, more snow GLOBAL WARMING, more rain and greening in Africa GLOBAL WARMING!
In fact, global warming may in fact be good for the planet, even if it isn't good for Humans.;)
My objection is that they are assumed "law" but never having been through the Legislature, cannot be "law"... by definition. So the assumption should be "these aren't laws, more like guidelines".
The problem isn't executive orders, it is that they aren't really laws, but are still treated as laws.
Try disobeying an Executive Order. Then you'll realize that they are considered "law".
Now, if what you're saying is that we can ignore them without consequences, then I'm in full agreement (in principle). But we all know that laws aren't meant for the rich and powerful, only us serfs.
Gravity, from our understanding of Newton's laws, we now know Newton was wrong (technically) but close enough (approximately correct). We know this because Einstein's models are more accurate (and yet.. still not correct). The problem with science is that it evolves as we gain understanding. AGW has so many different variables in it, that it is bound to be wrong, and we can't even tell how wrong it is.
This is why people use terms like "consensus" instead of "proven", because quite frankly it is still hypothesis and not even a very good one.
When the answer to "it is settled" is based on "consensus" and not actual facts, then there is a problem. Once upon a time, Piltdown Man was "consensus" (and considered fact) science. The problem is that Science isn't consensus, it is fact based.
Now, go and look at the Actual facts on AGW propopents, and you'll find all sorts of arbitrary and politically motivated "adjustments" to climate models whenever they break. Like the 15 years of "no global warming" (and counting) and the whole slew of predictions gone wrong. With a track record of failures why should we believe the GW proponents?
IMHO the Science isn't settled, because science isn't consensus.
HSR is a non-starter for most locations, IMHO. The cost is way too high for it to be functional.
Hyperloop is, from what I understand, way more flexible than HSR, and just as fast (or faster), with less of the overhead. That would make it a good replacement for larger citys like LA or NYC or even in metroplexes like SD-LA and the whole Beltway on the East Coast. It might even work for San Diego - Seattle or Boston-Miami runs.
Which is why I would suggest that if they start building it, start in NYC or LA with Proof of concept. The problem is, that nobody is going to build semi-permanent infrastructure for Proof of concept, as it is really egg-chicken problem.
I would think a Hyperloop would be best started "Small" scale, like within a City like LosAngeles. or NYC. And then connected to other nearby cities. However, with NYC, you'd piss off Taxi companies.
Dynamic Link Library. Typically a shared resource that can be dynamically loaded and unloaded when needed, and often shared among programs.
The problem with DLLs are that there are many versions of the same DLL that often need to run at the same time. Which means that you can substitute one version for another, and hijack a program. Nothing new here.
You can listen to sweet lies, or you can listen to cold hard truth. I know people would rather listen to lies told sweetly than someone speaking truth.
I've started saying "Am I wrong" when people dismiss what I say, because of how I say it, not because of the content of my message. "You're mean" "Am I wrong?" "well no... but.... "
Slashdot Mirror
God forbid that you ever owe for being a member of society.
Being a member of society is not the same as involuntary servitude (13th Amendment). Got it. YOU MUST PAY to belong! So much for free association (1st Amendment).
This is why socialists suck. They have no clue how they enslave a society.
You painted yourself there. Your words not mine.
I didn't miss the rest of the point. Someone who doesn't understand that Socialism is redistribution of wealth doesn't deserve any further consideration. And I explained why in my reply
It is funny how liberals are all for protecting certain "women" from "Microagressions" from the GOP, but dish out the most vile comments when it suits them. Would they call Hillary half the names they've called Hillary?
Just let that sink in. For you Bernie supporters, Bernie got 60% of the vote and 13 delegates, Hillary got 38% and got 15 delegates out of NH.
Hillary knows she cannot lose, because she has already grabbed all the Super Delegates the DNC machine has in place to thwart people like Sanders. All she needs to do is win enough delegates to augment her sizable lead in SuperDelegate count and walk in the Convention without actually needing to win anything.
Mark my word, Hillary is going to be the DNC nominee, even if there is FBI request for indictment.
And you think you have a choice.
Hillary?
Lose to Bernie? Bernie is not electable.
Lose to Hillary? Hillary can't even win the DNC primaries fair. Though I don't put it past her to tie up all the super delegates and win enough others to trump (pun intended) Bernies delegates, and get the nomination. Which would keep all the Bernie fans home in Nov, or worse, going to one of the Socialist/Communist party candidates.
To be honest, the choices for the D candidates is even more pathetic. You have a confirmed liar and a socialist nutjob who hasn't run anything. I'm not liking where our country is headed.
government wealth redistribution
This alone makes you socialist/communist.
As a Libertarian, I oppose the Min Wage. As a realist, I know you cannot repeal it. But as jobs disappear because Robots take over for humans (http://www.businessinsider.com/momentum-machines-burger-robot-2014-8 ) Min wage will become a non-issue.
The problem is, Government shouldn't pick winners and losers in the marketplace. If something is "too big to fail" it is too big. Period.
False Dichotomy choices D/R prevail, and continue to be foisted upon us by people trapped in a system they cannot see to escape from.
Every Single one of the D and R candidates would be disastrous for the citizens of the USA.
"As long as people don't allow anyone access to their private keys"
And there is the flaw in your plan.
Just remember folks, these are the same people in charge of your healthcare now.
Why we trust these people with our lives is beyond me. And why are systems so dependent upon stupid things like PINs for security?
Polar Ice Caps: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ja...
Hurricane Lull: http://www.livescience.com/507...
Greening of Africa: http://news.nationalgeographic...
These are "facts", and the "speculation" from the "Global Warming" nuts is also clearly documented. Here are a few good articles on exaggerated claims that never panned out:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/201...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/...
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03...
Please go ahead and make excuses as to why nearly 97% of all Global Warming Projections are wrong : http://www.westernjournalism.c...
Or perhaps you'll simply parrot someone else who doesn't actually know anything, or continue to believe "consensus = Science"
Because censorship has never been abused!
Who gets to define "Trolling" and "Bullying". My guess, suddenly all sorts of speech will be suddenly labels "Micro-aggression" and be banned.
"I'm voting for _________" -- not politically correct candidate = BANHAMMER!!!
The people saying "global warming" are all paid to say "global warming" to get/keep Government funding, so that government can dictate to everyone (except rich n powerful) that we need to give up every technology that makes the world run.
The fact is, ever number has been fudged to get the results they are wanting, to prove what they need to prove, to keep getting funding to support something that has no basis except "consensus"
When every major prediction has failed, the the consensus cannot be right. I remember all those predictions of "worse hurricanes" followed by "almost no hurricanes", and "Polar Ice caps disappearing" only to have "polar Ice caps expanding (which is now the new "proof" of global warming), on down the line.
not to mention the Greening of Africa, when it was supposed to be getting drier and more desert like: http://news.nationalgeographic...
The problem isn't Global warming, it is that EVERYTHING is blamed on it. Ice growing or shrinking .. GLOBAL WARMING, more snow GLOBAL WARMING, more rain and greening in Africa GLOBAL WARMING!
In fact, global warming may in fact be good for the planet, even if it isn't good for Humans. ;)
My objection is that they are assumed "law" but never having been through the Legislature, cannot be "law" ... by definition. So the assumption should be "these aren't laws, more like guidelines".
The problem isn't executive orders, it is that they aren't really laws, but are still treated as laws.
Try disobeying an Executive Order. Then you'll realize that they are considered "law".
Now, if what you're saying is that we can ignore them without consequences, then I'm in full agreement (in principle). But we all know that laws aren't meant for the rich and powerful, only us serfs.
Gravity, from our understanding of Newton's laws, we now know Newton was wrong (technically) but close enough (approximately correct). We know this because Einstein's models are more accurate (and yet .. still not correct). The problem with science is that it evolves as we gain understanding. AGW has so many different variables in it, that it is bound to be wrong, and we can't even tell how wrong it is.
This is why people use terms like "consensus" instead of "proven", because quite frankly it is still hypothesis and not even a very good one.
When the answer to "it is settled" is based on "consensus" and not actual facts, then there is a problem. Once upon a time, Piltdown Man was "consensus" (and considered fact) science. The problem is that Science isn't consensus, it is fact based.
Now, go and look at the Actual facts on AGW propopents, and you'll find all sorts of arbitrary and politically motivated "adjustments" to climate models whenever they break. Like the 15 years of "no global warming" (and counting) and the whole slew of predictions gone wrong. With a track record of failures why should we believe the GW proponents?
IMHO the Science isn't settled, because science isn't consensus.
HSR is a non-starter for most locations, IMHO. The cost is way too high for it to be functional.
Hyperloop is, from what I understand, way more flexible than HSR, and just as fast (or faster), with less of the overhead. That would make it a good replacement for larger citys like LA or NYC or even in metroplexes like SD-LA and the whole Beltway on the East Coast. It might even work for San Diego - Seattle or Boston-Miami runs.
Which is why I would suggest that if they start building it, start in NYC or LA with Proof of concept. The problem is, that nobody is going to build semi-permanent infrastructure for Proof of concept, as it is really egg-chicken problem.
I would think a Hyperloop would be best started "Small" scale, like within a City like LosAngeles. or NYC. And then connected to other nearby cities. However, with NYC, you'd piss off Taxi companies.
Why implement it ? That sounds like too much work!
Nothing new, because it is how Windows was designed from the early days.
Dynamic Link Library. Typically a shared resource that can be dynamically loaded and unloaded when needed, and often shared among programs.
The problem with DLLs are that there are many versions of the same DLL that often need to run at the same time. Which means that you can substitute one version for another, and hijack a program. Nothing new here.
You can listen to sweet lies, or you can listen to cold hard truth. I know people would rather listen to lies told sweetly than someone speaking truth.
I've started saying "Am I wrong" when people dismiss what I say, because of how I say it, not because of the content of my message. "You're mean" "Am I wrong?" "well no ... but .... "
Done.