Slashdot Mirror


User: spongman

spongman's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,450
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,450

  1. Re:CNET News.com on Gator CPO at the Department of Homeland Security · · Score: 1

    but they do have the right not to be forced to take a loss.

  2. Re:C# Rocks - go mono go. on Mono Progress In the Past Year · · Score: 3, Insightful
    socket servers in .NET should be written using the {Begin|End}{Accept|Send|Receive} Socket methods. These methods make usee of completion ports on Win2k and later (and assync-io on Mono) and are the recommended way to ensure scalability. the old Unix 'select' pattern is broken as far as scalability is concerned - even on Unix.

    I've had a .NET app handle 100,000+ active TCP connections on a Win2k3 box without blinking an eye.

    Just watch out for heap fragmentation caused by pinning your input buffers. It's best to preallocate them in blocks and reuse them when you can.

  3. Re:maddening on What's New With Data Structures In C# · · Score: 2, Informative

    unfortunately, NCollection is vaporware. another good source for C#v2 collections is Wintellect's Power Collections which seems to provide a good deal of what's missing.

  4. Re:DRM implications on QEMU Accelerator Achieves Near-Native Performance · · Score: 1
    this is true if the application (ie napster) isn't using the full capabilitie of DRM (which it currently doesn't, see below).

    however, if it were, the decoded PCM stream that the sound card gets still would contain significant amounts of noise. it's up to the sound card to remove this noise in hardware. unless you're a trusted hardware vendor, microsoft won't tell you how to do this.

    napster doesn't use this secure audio path mainly because nobody has sound cards that support it.

  5. Re:I find it slightly worrying... on Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Trailer · · Score: 1

    Hang on, weren't most of Dr. Who & Blake's 7 filmed on location in quarries? Oh, wait... you're right...

  6. Turing award? on ACM to Honor TCP/IP Creators with Turing Award · · Score: 2, Funny

    does this mean we won't be able to tell the difference between talking to them and talking to real people?

  7. Re:I find it slightly worrying... on Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Trailer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ford: Look, I can't help what you may personally be filming in, but...

    Zaphod: Computer!

    Zaphod: Oh, no!

    Computer: Hi there! This is Eddie your shipboard computer, and I'm feeling just great guys, and I know I'm just going to get a bundle of kicks out of any programme you care to run through me.

    Zaphod: Computer, tell us again where we're filming today.

    Computer: A real pleasure feller, we are currently in an old quarry on the legendary planet of Magrathea.

    Ford: Proving nothing, I wouldn't trust that computer to speak my weight.

  8. Re:Inaccurate Inaccurate comparison on Don Box: Huge Security Holes in Solaris, JVM · · Score: 1

    i'm saying you don't need the ISAPI dll, you can just host and call ASP.NET directly.

  9. Re:Quality on Ask Microsoft's Martin Taylor About Linux vs. Windows · · Score: 1

    for a semi-official answer, see this blog entry and its comments.

  10. Re:C++ support in Java vs .NET on Don Box: Huge Security Holes in Solaris, JVM · · Score: 1
    to paraphrase: "it's harder to write insecure code, therefore it's more secure."

    sounds like security by obscurity to me...

    that's a good thing, right?

  11. Re:From the 'Yeah, well, duh!" department on Don Box: Huge Security Holes in Solaris, JVM · · Score: 1
    or when you click-click-click for the younger generation
    err, that would be "double-click-right-click-click-click-click..."

    OH SHIT!!!

  12. Re:Why no tainted data in either runtime? on Don Box: Huge Security Holes in Solaris, JVM · · Score: 1

    you're correct. but .NET does allow you to have many AppDomains in a single process, each running with different code access security permission sets. One AppDomain could be allowed to write to the local drive, whereas you could load code from the network and run it in an AppDomain that's not allowed to write locally (or only write to temporary storage), run unsafe code, or whatever, depending on the permissions you give it.

  13. Re:Inaccurate Inaccurate comparison on Don Box: Huge Security Holes in Solaris, JVM · · Score: 1
    OR the fact that ASP.net is built on IIS.
    It's not built on IIS at all, it's built on an ISAPI .DLL called aspnet_isapi.dll. The code for this could be quickly adapted for any other platform (assuming it was open sourced/completed by MS).
    Actully, it's not built on either. ASP.NET can easily be hosted natively within any process you like (including Cassini and Apache) without the need for wrapping the ISAPI dll.
  14. Re:It's called unsafe code for a reason on Gosling Claims Huge Security Hole in .NET · · Score: 1

    get a clue, your processor can ONLY execute "unsafe" code.

  15. Re:Advertisement? on Gosling Claims Huge Security Hole in .NET · · Score: 1
    If you run Java code in a sandbox then you're safe.

    If you run .NET code in a sandbox then you're also safe.

    What Gosling forgot to mention that while Java has a sandbox model, .NET also has a so-call 'Code Access Security' infrastructure that goes far beyond Java's simplistic 'app/applet' security.

  16. what 1st program? on First Program Executed on L4 Port of GNU/HURD · · Score: 2, Funny

    that 1st program wasn't a web server by any chance, was it?

  17. Re:Script Data Structures in place of XML on W3C launches Binary XML Packaging · · Score: 1
    you've thrown away information:
    • the name of the 'container' element.
    • the fact that it's the 'name' attribute of the 'title' element whose value is "title"
    • what would it look like if the 'foo' attribute of the second item's name element was "bar"?
    • it's not obvious how you'd support namespaces or processing instructions...
  18. Re:Windows is the same as the begining on Through The Steve Ballmer Looking Glass · · Score: 2, Informative

    progman.exe in XP exists mainly to provide a DDE bridge so legacy programs' installers can put shortcuts in the start menu using the old (win3.1) API.

  19. Re:I've read this article before it was on /.... on Mathematics of the Social Security "Crisis" · · Score: 1

    sure, but what you're ignoring is the fact that the governmnt buys a T-bill from itself for the value of your taxes, sticks that t-bill in the drawer with your name on it, and then goes right ahead and spends your taxes on benifits.

  20. Re:I've read this article before it was on /.... on Mathematics of the Social Security "Crisis" · · Score: 1
    There is no such thing as the SS surplus (trust fund, whatever you want to call it) - it's just an accounting slight-of-hand used by the government to fudge the books.

    the taxes you pay don't get invested until you retire, they get collected and then immediately get spent buying benifits for the current set of retirees.

  21. Re:Well... on Sought for MGM v. Grokster: Non-Infringing P2P Use · · Score: 1

    hollow-points are banned in warfare by Declaration III of the Hague Convention of 1899. hollow-point rounds are readily available for common assault rifles (R223 & 762). as for suitability for hunting, well, people still hunt with bows precicely because it's harder. There's not much sport in hitting your prey from a mile away - you might as well be shooting at tin-cans.

  22. Re:Surprisingly, a patch is already out on New Spoofing Vulnerability in IE · · Score: 1

    or here.

  23. Re:Hardware independence? on A .Net CPU · · Score: 1
    Thus defeating the original purpose
    How, exactly, does having a CPU able to natively run a VM's bytecode/IL reduce that VM's hardware independance?
  24. Re:Desktop Search? on Microsoft Releases Toolbar Suite · · Score: 1

    it makes the search use the database created by the index service (which scans files as they are added/modified).

  25. Re:Desktop Search? on Microsoft Releases Toolbar Suite · · Score: 1

    what, like this?